Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 69 references

Offset geometry for extended field-of-view in multi-contrast and multi-scale X-ray microtomography of lung cancer lobectomy specimens

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Offsetting the rotation axis of a cone-beam micro-CT system can double the horizontal field of view at unchanged voxel size, and the paper demonstrates it for multi-contrast, multi-scale imaging of resected human lung tissue.

desk verdict A practical, well-demonstrated FOV-extension trick for lab phase-contrast micro-CT, with a real but fixable gap in the cone-beam weighting justification. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.10322 v1 pith:O76EY2WW submitted 2025-02-14 physics.med-ph physics.ins-det

Harry Allan , Adam Doherty , Carlos Navarrete-León , Oriol Roche i Morgó , Yunpeng Jia , Charlotte Percival , Zoe Hagel , Kate E J Otter
show 8 more authors
Chuen Ryan Khaw Kate Gowers Helen Hall Sam M Janes Fleur Monk David Moore Joseph Jacob Marco Endrizzi
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.med-phphysics.ins-det
keywords X-raymicrotomographyphase-contrastimagingoffsetcentre-of-rotationfield-of-viewextensionbeam-trackingfree-spacepropagationvirtualhistologycone-beamCT
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that simply offsetting the rotation axis of a cone-beam X-ray microtomography system—rather than offsetting the detector—extends the horizontal field of view by up to a factor of two at unchanged voxel size and without losing X-ray flux. The key is a smooth redundancy weighting that lets a full 360° scan combine rays that pass through the sample more than once, replacing the need for a larger detector, rebinned geometry, or iterative reconstruction. On a resected human lung lobectomy specimen the method produced a 4.3 cm field of view at 10.5 µm voxels using beam-tracking multi-contrast imaging (attenuation, phase, dark-field), and a 2.7 mm field of view at 450 nm voxels using free-space propagation phase retrieval on the same instrument. If it holds, lab-based virtual histology can image whole tissue samples at microscopic resolution without custom hardware.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the offset centre-of-rotation geometry: the sample rotates about an axis displaced laterally from the source-detector line, so the full cone beam still hits the detector and no flux is lost. The load-bearing object is the smooth redundancy weighting function $W(x)$ of Eq. (11), adapted from complementary short-scan weights, which assigns full weight to rays seen once and combines rays seen twice by enforcing $W(D_{\mathrm{COR}}+\beta)+W(D_{\mathrm{COR}}-\beta)=2$ in angle about the projected centre of rotation. It is applied after ramp filtering in Eq. (12), and backprojection uses a vector cone-beam projector, so the reconstruction needs no rebinning and no iterative refinement.

What would settle it

Take a 3D phantom with known attenuation, phase, and dark-field distributions, simulate or measure offset-COR projections over 360°, reconstruct each channel with the proposed weighting, and compare the redundant crescent region against a full-field reference reconstruction; if the weighting is only valid for the central row, the error in the crescent will exceed the error in the always-visible disc. A physical version would scan a phantom small enough to fit both native and extended field-of-view and compare line profiles across the seam.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that a cone-beam micro-CT system with a fixed source and detector can image samples nearly twice as wide as its native field of view, at the same spatial resolution, by translating the rotation stage so the centre of rotation is offset from the source-detector axis and scanning a full 360°. In the offset geometry, rays in the central circular region are measured twice and rays in the outer crescent are measured once; the proposed weighting function $W(x)$ (Eq. 11) smooths between these cases in angle about the projected centre of rotation, satisfying $W(D_{\mathrm{COR}}+\beta)+W(D_{\mathrm{COR}}-\beta)=2$, and is applied to ramp-filtered projections before vector backprojection. The authors demonstrate the method in two experimental regimes on a human lung lobectomy specimen: a beam-tracking scan with 10.5 µm voxels over a 4.3 cm horizontal field of view giving quantitative attenuation, phase, and dark-field volumes that resolve vessels of tens of micrometres and emphysematous air spaces, and a free-space propagation scan with 450 nm voxels over 2.7 mm resolving alveolar septa and vessels of roughly 8 µm. They argue the same recipe extends to grating, edge-illumination, and speckle-tracking systems and to conventional cone-beam CT.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's load-bearing assumption is that the smooth weighting function, which is validated on a central-row attenuation-only Shepp-Logan simulation and on qualitative experimental images, also correctly handles redundant rays for full 3D reconstructions and for phase and dark-field contrast channels; the redundancy property that makes it work is not derived for those cases.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single lab instrument can first image an entire resected tissue sample at 10.5 µm voxels and then zoom into a 2.7 mm region at 450 nm voxels, giving context plus cellular detail without changing detectors or resolution.
  • The field-of-view extension is achieved at no loss of flux density per detector element and without rebinning or iterative reconstruction, so the extra coverage costs little in scan or computation time.
  • The method preserves quantitative multi-contrast channels: attenuation, integrated phase, and dark-field, because the same redundancy weighting is applied to each retrieved projection.
  • Because only a translation of the rotation stage is required, the approach applies directly to grating, edge-illumination, speckle-tracking, free-space propagation, and conventional cone-beam CT systems.
  • The demonstrated extension factors of 1.7x and 1.85x indicate the near-2x limit is reachable when the sample fills the full redundant region.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the weighting condition holds in full 3D, the same offset-COR principle could be stacked with tiled gratings or scanning-based field-of-view extension to push beyond 2x; the paper notes compatibility but does not test the combination.
  • The angular-symmetry argument suggests the method should generalize to non-circular trajectories or partial 360° arcs, where the redundancy condition would take a different angular interval; that is a natural next test.
  • A quantitative agreement study comparing offset-COR reconstructions with a large-detector reference on the same physical phantom would separate weighting artefacts from sample-preparation effects, which the current experimental images cannot do.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper describes an offset center-of-rotation (offset-COR) acquisition geometry for cone-beam X-ray microtomography, combined with a smooth redundancy weighting function and a full 360° scan, to extend the field of view without detector rebinning. The method is demonstrated numerically on the central detector row with a Shepp-Logan phantom and experimentally in two configurations: a beam-tracking multi-contrast scan of a resected human lung lobectomy achieving a 4.3 cm horizontal FOV at 10.5 µm voxels, and a free-space-propagation phase-contrast scan of a 2.7 mm specimen segment at 450 nm voxels. The authors claim the approach doubles the achievable FOV without sacrificing spatial resolution and is compatible with multi-contrast and multi-scale X-ray phase-contrast imaging.

Significance. If the full 3D cone-beam validity of the weighting is established, the contribution is practically valuable: it offers a simple, hardware-compatible way to increase FOV for lab-based multi-contrast micro-CT, with public reconstruction code and two well-executed experimental demonstrations that show plausible image quality. The simulations demonstrate that the weighting works for the central fan-beam row, and the experimental images support feasibility. However, the central claim of 'no resolution loss' and the multi-contrast applicability depend on a row-independent weighting whose off-plane behavior is not yet demonstrated; the significance is therefore conditional on additional 3D validation.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.3, Eq. (11)] The redundancy condition for the offset-COR geometry is stated as W(D_COR + β) + W(D_COR − β) = 2, but the paper does not derive Eq. (11) or verify analytically that its piecewise definition satisfies this condition over the full redundant region. The weight is adapted from the two complementary short-scan work of Belotti et al. [37], which is a different acquisition scheme, while the present method uses a single full 360° scan. Since the weighting is the mechanism that makes truncated offset-COR projections quantitatively reconstructable, an analytic check or derivation of the redundancy property for Eq. (11) is load-bearing and currently missing.
  2. [§2.4, simulations] The numerical validation is performed only on the central detector row, i.e., as a 2D fan-beam problem, using a Shepp-Logan phantom and simple line integrals. In a true cone-beam geometry, a ray through an off-plane point and its complementary ray from the opposite source position generally strike different detector rows, so a weight W(x) that depends only on the detector column cannot in general satisfy a line-based redundancy normalization for off-plane points. The paper provides no 3D simulation or off-plane numerical test to show that the row-independent weighting is adequate at the experimental cone angles. This is a direct gap in the support for the claim that the FOV is doubled without sacrificing spatial resolution.
  3. [§3.2, experiments] The two experimental demonstrations are qualitative and do not provide a numerical check on the 3D reconstruction accuracy of the offset weighting. For instance, the line profile in Fig. 4h reports a 45 µm FWHM through an arterial lumen, but this quantity mixes the anatomical lumen width with the system spatial resolution and is not a resolution or accuracy measurement of the offset-COR reconstruction. To support the 'no loss of spatial resolution' claim, the authors should report a quantitative resolution or accuracy metric (e.g., edge response, point-like feature spread, or comparison against a full-FOV reference scan) for both geometries.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§2.3, Eq. (11)] The symbol 'sng' appears to denote the sign function; please define it explicitly. Also, the piecewise conditions use 'D0 < x ≤ Dend', which omits the point x = D0; please clarify the value of W at that boundary and whether continuity is intended.
  2. [§2.3] The relationship between the detector-coordinate x and the angle β used in the redundancy condition is not stated explicitly; adding the conversion would help readers verify the symmetry condition against the plot in Fig. 2.
  3. [§4, Discussion] The text reads 'interoperative imaging' in the paragraph on rapid reconstructions; this should be 'intraoperative imaging'.
  4. [§2.5, experiments] For the free-space-propagation experiment, the offset is given as ΔCOR ≈ 630 µm and the FOV increase as 1.85×, but the exact source-to-detector distance and magnification are not specified in the same detail as for the beam-tracking setup; please provide the complete geometry parameters for reproducibility.
  5. [§3.1, simulations] The simulation uses 2701 projections at 12.5 µm pixel size and a detector of 2424 columns, but the corresponding angular sampling step and the exact phantom placement relative to the COR are not given; listing these parameters would make the simulation reproducible.
  6. [§3.2, experiments] The beam-tracking experiment reports a total exposure time of 18 hours and the FSP experiment 'just under 7 hours'; it would be useful to state whether these include overhead (e.g., mask dithering steps and flat-field acquisition) or only integration time.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the offset-COR weighting and reconstruction pipeline is explicit, geometry-based, and cross-checked against a ground-truth phantom; self-citations are ancillary rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is the extension of cone-beam micro-CT field-of-view through an offset center-of-rotation with redundancy weighting. The source and detector positions are defined geometrically in Eqs. 9-10, and the weighting function W(x) is given explicitly in Eq. 11; it is adapted from the external work of Belotti et al. [37] and Cho et al. [56], not defined in terms of the reconstructed volume or the experimental images. The redundancy condition W(DCOR + beta) + W(DCOR - beta) = 2 is stated as a requirement, and the weight is constructed to satisfy it, but this is an assumption validated by simulation, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The simulation in Sec. 2.4 uses a Shepp-Logan phantom with known ground truth and reports MSE, so the reconstruction accuracy is benchmarked against an external reference rather than against the paper's own outputs. The multi-contrast retrieval equations (Eqs. 1-7) are based on established beam-tracking and dark-field linearity results, including prior peer-reviewed work; these are supporting ingredients, not quantities that encode the offset-geometry outcome. Self-citations that appear, such as the public reconstruction code [57] and the instrument description [60], do not carry the argument: the offset-COR weighting and its validation stand on explicit equations, the ASTRA toolbox, and the ground-truth simulation. The admitted limitation in Sec. 2.4, that the simulation covers only the central detector row and simple line integrals without phase effects, is a validation gap for the 3D multi-contrast case, but it is a correctness or robustness concern rather than circular reasoning. No step of the derivation reduces, by construction or by self-citation, to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to make the offset weighting work; all geometry values are measured setup parameters. The Paganin δ/β=1200 and Gaussian smoothing values are image-processing choices that affect the demonstrations but not the validity of the FOV-extension claim. The paper introduces no new physical entities, particles, forces, dimensions, or conserved quantities.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Circular cone-beam trajectory with a static object and a rigid source-detector pair, with the ASTRA Toolbox vector geometry describing the system exactly.
    Used throughout Section 2.3 and in reconstruction via Eq. 12; any mechanical drift or trajectory error would violate the geometry assumed by the weights and backprojection.
  • domain assumption The attenuation, refraction, and dark-field signals retrieved from beam-tracking (Eqs. 2-4) are line integrals compatible with tomographic reconstruction (Eqs. 5-7).
    Invoked in Section 2.1 to justify reconstructing multi-contrast volumes; relies on prior results [47,48] for dark-field linearity with thickness.
  • domain assumption The homogeneous-object Transport of Intensity approximation with a fixed δ/β=1200 is valid for the lung-tissue segment in the FSP experiment.
    Used in Section 2.5 for Paganin single-distance phase retrieval (Eq. 8); standard but unvalidated for this specific sample.
  • ad hoc to paper Reprojection of the Shepp-Logan phantom with simple X-ray line integrals adequately represents the offset-COR cone-beam geometry for validating the redundancy weighting.
    The simulation in Section 2.4 ignores phase effects, scatter, and cone-beam artifacts outside the central slice, so it does not fully exercise the 3D multi-contrast retrieval chain.
  • standard math The redundancy condition W(DCOR + β) + W(DCOR - β) = 2 from Cho et al. [56] applies to offset-COR geometry with the angular symmetry adopted in Eq. 11.
    This is the mathematical backbone of the weighting; the paper adapts it from [37,56] without an independent derivation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Offset geometry for extended field-of-view in multi-contrast and multi-scale X-ray microtomography of lung cancer lobectomy specimens." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/O76EY2WW

@misc{pith2026250210322,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Offset geometry for extended field-of-view in multi-contrast and multi-scale X-ray microtomography of lung cancer lobectomy specimens},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/O76EY2WW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.10322}
}
abstract

X-ray microtomography is a powerful non-destructive technique allowing 3D virtual histology of resected human tissue. The achievable imaging field-of-view, is however limited by the fixed number of detector elements, enforcing the requirement to sacrifice spatial resolution in order to image larger samples. In applications such as soft-tissue imaging, phase-contrast methods are often employed to enhance image contrast. Some of these methods, especially those suited to laboratory sources, rely on optical elements, the dimensions of which can impose a further limitation on the field-of-view. We describe an efficient method to double the maximum field-of-view of a cone-beam X-ray microtomography system, without sacrificing on spatial resolution, and including multi-contrast capabilities. We demonstrate an experimental realisation of the method, achieving exemplary reconstructions of a resected human lung sample, with a cubic voxel of 10.5 $\mu$m linear dimensions, across a horizontal field-of-view of 4.3 cm. The same concepts are applied to free-space propagation imaging of a 2.7 mm segment of the same sample, achieving a cubic voxel of 450 nm linear dimensions. We show that the methodology can be applied at a range of different length-scales and geometries, and that it is directly compatible with complementary implementations of X-ray phase-contrast imaging.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.10322 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. a) A diagram of the experimental system for beam-tracking x-ray microtomography with an offset [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A diagram demonstrating the definitions of the offset tomography geometry. The centre-of-rotation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Results of the offset scan simulation study illustrating the reconstructions achieved using the large [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Axial slices of the offset beam-tracking tomography in attenuation (a), phase (b), and dark-field (c) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Axial slice (a) and maximum intensity projection corresponding to a thickness of 67.5 µm (b) of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [37]

    Extension of the cone-beam ct field-of-view using two com- plementary short scans,

    G. Belotti, G. Fattori, G. Baroni, and S. Rit, “Extension of the cone-beam ct field-of-view using two com- plementary short scans,” Medical Physics, 2023

    work page 2023

  2. [1]

    X-ray computed tomography,

    P . J. Withers, C. Bouman, S. Carmignato, V. Cnudde, D. Grimaldi, C. K. Hagen, E. Maire, M. Manley, A. Du Plessis, and S. R. Stock, “X-ray computed tomography,” Nature Reviews Methods Primers, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 18, 2021

    work page 2021

  3. [2]

    X-ray microtomography,

    E. N. Landis and D. T. Keane, “X-ray microtomography,” Materials characterization , vol. 61, no. 12, pp. 1305–1316, 2010

    work page 2010

  4. [3]

    X-ray micro-computed tomography for nondestructive three-dimensional (3d) x-ray histology,

    O. L. Katsamenis, M. Olding, J. A. Warner, D. S. Chatelet, M. G. Jones, G. Sgalla, B. Smit, O. J. Larkin, I. Haig, L. Richeldi, et al., “X-ray micro-computed tomography for nondestructive three-dimensional (3d) x-ray histology,”The American journal of pathology, vol. 189, no. 8, pp. 1608–1620, 2019

    work page 2019

  5. [4]

    3d virtual pathohistology of lung tissue from covid-19 patients based on phase contrast x-ray tomography,

    M. Eckermann, J. Frohn, M. Reichardt, M. Osterhoff, M. Sprung, F . Westermeier, A. Tzankov, C. Werlein, M. K ¨uhnel, D. Jonigk, et al., “3d virtual pathohistology of lung tissue from covid-19 patients based on phase contrast x-ray tomography,”Elife, vol. 9, p. e60408, 2020

    work page 2020

  6. [5]

    Synchrotron radiation- based refraction-contrast tomographic images using x-ray dark-field imaging optics in human lung adeno- carcinoma and histologic correlations,

    E. Yi, N. Sunaguchi, J. H. Lee, C.-Y . Kim, S. Lee, S. Jheon, M. Ando, and Y . Seok, “Synchrotron radiation- based refraction-contrast tomographic images using x-ray dark-field imaging optics in human lung adeno- carcinoma and histologic correlations,” Diagnostics, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 487, 2021

    work page 2021

  7. [6]

    Quantitative 3d micro-ct imaging of human lung tissue,

    M. Kampschulte, C. Schneider, H. Litzlbauer, D. Tscholl, C. Schneider, C. Zeiner, G. Krombach, E. Rit- man, R. Bohle, and A. Langheinrich, “Quantitative 3d micro-ct imaging of human lung tissue,” in R¨oFo- Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der R¨ontgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren, vol. 185, pp. 869–876, © Georg Thieme Verlag KG, 2013

    work page 2013

  8. [7]

    Three- dimensional measurement of alveolar airspace volumes in normal and emphysematous lungs using micro- ct,

    H. Parameswaran, E. Bartol ´ak-Suki, H. Hamakawa, A. Majumdar, P . G. Allen, and B. Suki, “Three- dimensional measurement of alveolar airspace volumes in normal and emphysematous lungs using micro- ct,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 583–592, 2009

    work page 2009

Show all 69 references
  1. [8]

    X-ray phase-contrast imaging,

    M. Endrizzi, “X-ray phase-contrast imaging,”Nuclear instruments and methods in physics research section A: Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment, vol. 878, pp. 88–98, 2018

    2018

  2. [9]

    On the possibilities of x-ray phase contrast microimaging by coherent high-energy synchrotron radiation,

    A. Snigirev, I. Snigireva, V. Kohn, S. Kuznetsov, and I. Schelokov, “On the possibilities of x-ray phase contrast microimaging by coherent high-energy synchrotron radiation,” Review of scientific instruments , vol. 66, no. 12, pp. 5486–5492, 1995

    1995

  3. [10]

    Hard x-ray phase imaging using simple propaga- tion of a coherent synchrotron radiation beam,

    P . Cloetens, W. Ludwig, J. Baruchel, J.-P . Guigay, P . Pernot-Rejm ´ankov´a, M. Salom ´e-Pateyron, M. Schlenker, J.-Y . Buffi`ere, E. Maire, and G. Peix, “Hard x-ray phase imaging using simple propaga- tion of a coherent synchrotron radiation beam,” Journal of Physics D: App...

    1999

  4. [11]

    Phase-contrast imaging using polychro- matic hard x-rays,

    S. Wilkins, T. E. Gureyev, D. Gao, A. Pogany, and A. Stevenson, “Phase-contrast imaging using polychro- matic hard x-rays,”Nature, vol. 384, no. 6607, pp. 335–338, 1996

    1996

  5. [12]

    Phase retrieval and differential phase-contrast imaging with low-brilliance x-ray sources,

    F . Pfeiffer, T. Weitkamp, O. Bunk, and C. David, “Phase retrieval and differential phase-contrast imaging with low-brilliance x-ray sources,”Nature physics, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 258–261, 2006

    2006

  6. [13]

    A coded-aperture technique allowing x-ray phase contrast imaging with conven- tional sources,

    A. Olivo and R. Speller, “A coded-aperture technique allowing x-ray phase contrast imaging with conven- tional sources,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 91, no. 7, p. 074106, 2007. 10

    2007

  7. [14]

    Beam tracking approach for single–shot retrieval of absorption, refraction, and dark–field signals with laboratory x–ray sources,

    F . A. Vittoria, G. K. Kallon, D. Basta, P . C. Diemoz, I. K. Robinson, A. Olivo, and M. Endrizzi, “Beam tracking approach for single–shot retrieval of absorption, refraction, and dark–field signals with laboratory x–ray sources,”Applied Physics Letters, vol. 106, no. 22, p. 2...

    2015

  8. [15]

    Speckle-based x-ray phase-contrast and dark-field imaging with a laboratory source,

    I. Zanette, T. Zhou, A. Burvall, U. Lundstr ¨om, D. H. Larsson, M. Zdora, P . Thibault, F . Pfeiffer, and H. M. Hertz, “Speckle-based x-ray phase-contrast and dark-field imaging with a laboratory source,” Physical review letters, vol. 112, no. 25, p. 253903, 2014

    2014

  9. [16]

    Implicit tracking approach for x-ray phase-contrast imaging with a random mask and a conventional system,

    L. Qu ´enot, H. Roug ´e-Labriet, S. Bohic, S. Berujon, and E. Brun, “Implicit tracking approach for x-ray phase-contrast imaging with a random mask and a conventional system,”Optica, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 1412– 1415, 2021

    2021

  10. [17]

    Investigation of the signature of lung tissue in x-ray grating-based phase-contrast imaging,

    T. Weber, F . Bayer, W. Haas, G. Pelzer, J. Rieger, A. Ritter, L. Wucherer, J. M. Braun, J. Durst, T. Michel, et al., “Investigation of the signature of lung tissue in x-ray grating-based phase-contrast imaging,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1212.5031, 2012

    2012 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Grating-based x-ray dark-field computed tomography of living mice,

    A. Velroyen, A. Y aroshenko, D. Hahn, A. Fehringer, A. Tapfer, M. M¨uller, P . No¨el, B. Pauwels, A. Sasov, A. Yildirim, et al., “Grating-based x-ray dark-field computed tomography of living mice,” EBioMedicine, vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 1500–1506, 2015

    2015

  12. [19]

    Real-time in vivo imaging of regional lung function in a mouse model of cystic fibrosis on a laboratory x-ray source,

    R. P . Murrie, F . Werdiger, M. Donnelley, Y .-w. Lin, R. P . Carnibella, C. R. Samarage, I. Pinar, M. Preissner, J. Wang, J. Li,et al., “Real-time in vivo imaging of regional lung function in a mouse model of cystic fibrosis on a laboratory x-ray source,” Scientific reports, ...

    2020

  13. [20]

    Detection of involved margins in breast specimens with x-ray phase-contrast computed tomography,

    L. Massimi, T. Suaris, C. K. Hagen, M. Endrizzi, P . R. Munro, G. Havariyoun, P . Hawker, B. Smit, A. Astolfo, O. J. Larkin,et al., “Detection of involved margins in breast specimens with x-ray phase-contrast computed tomography,”Scientific reports, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2021

    2021

  14. [21]

    Volumetric high-resolution x-ray phase-contrast virtual histology of breast specimens with a compact laboratory system,

    L. Massimi, T. Suaris, C. K. Hagen, M. Endrizzi, P . R. Munro, G. Havariyoun, P . S. Hawker, B. Smit, A. Astolfo, O. J. Larkin, et al., “Volumetric high-resolution x-ray phase-contrast virtual histology of breast specimens with a compact laboratory system,” IEEE transactions o...

    2021

  15. [22]

    Quantitative breast tissue characterization using grating-based x-ray phase-contrast imaging,

    M. Willner, J. Herzen, S. Grandl, S. Auweter, D. Mayr, A. Hipp, M. Chabior, A. Sarapata, K. Achterhold, I. Zanette, et al., “Quantitative breast tissue characterization using grating-based x-ray phase-contrast imaging,” Physics in Medicine & Biology, vol. 59, no. 7, p. 1557, 2014

    2014

  16. [23]

    Monitoring tissue engineered constructs and protocols with laboratory- based x-ray phase contrast tomography,

    S. Savvidis, M. F . Gerli, M. Pellegrini, L. Massimi, C. K. Hagen, M. Endrizzi, A. Atzeni, O. K. Ogunbiyi, M. Turmaine, E. S. Smith, et al., “Monitoring tissue engineered constructs and protocols with laboratory- based x-ray phase contrast tomography,”Acta Biomaterialia, vol. ...

    2022

  17. [24]

    Three-dimensional mouse brain cytoarchitecture revealed by laboratory-based x-ray phase-contrast to- mography,

    M. T ¨opperwien, M. Krenkel, D. Vincenz, F . St ¨ober, A. M. Oelschlegel, J. Goldschmidt, and T. Salditt, “Three-dimensional mouse brain cytoarchitecture revealed by laboratory-based x-ray phase-contrast to- mography,”Scientific reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 42847, 2017

    2017

  18. [25]

    Experimental results from a preclinical x-ray phase-contrast ct scanner,

    A. Tapfer, M. Bech, A. Velroyen, J. Meiser, J. Mohr, M. Walter, J. Schulz, B. Pauwels, P . Bruyndonckx, X. Liu, et al., “Experimental results from a preclinical x-ray phase-contrast ct scanner,”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 109, no. 39, pp. 15691–15696, 2012

    2012

  19. [26]

    Enhanced com- posite plate impact damage detection and characterisation using x-ray refraction and scattering contrast combined with ultrasonic imaging,

    D. Shoukroun, L. Massimi, F . Iacoviello, M. Endrizzi, D. Bate, A. Olivo, and P . Fromme, “Enhanced com- posite plate impact damage detection and characterisation using x-ray refraction and scattering contrast combined with ultrasonic imaging,” Composites Part B: Engineering, ...

    2020

  20. [27]

    Porosity determination of carbon and glass fibre reinforced polymers using phase-contrast imaging,

    C. Gusenbauer, M. Reiter, B. Plank, D. Salaberger, S. Senck, and J. Kastner, “Porosity determination of carbon and glass fibre reinforced polymers using phase-contrast imaging,” Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, vol. 38, pp. 1–10, 2019

    2019

  21. [28]

    Mi- crostructural analysis of secondary pulmonary lobule imaged by synchrotron radiation micro ct using offset scan mode,

    Y . Kawata, K. Kageyama, N. Niki, K. Umetani, K. Y ada, H. Ohamatsu, N. Moriyama, and H. Itoh, “Mi- crostructural analysis of secondary pulmonary lobule imaged by synchrotron radiation micro ct using offset scan mode,” in Medical Imaging 2010: Biomedical Applications in Molecu...

    2010

  22. [29]

    Imaging intact human organs with local resolution of cellular structures using hierarchical phase-contrast tomography,

    C. Walsh, P . Tafforeau, W. Wagner, D. Jafree, A. Bellier, C. Werlein, M. K ¨uhnel, E. Boller, S. Walker- Samuel, J. Robertus, et al., “Imaging intact human organs with local resolution of cellular structures using hierarchical phase-contrast tomography,”Nature methods, vol. 1...

    2021

  23. [30]

    Data processing methods and data acquisition for samples larger than the field of view in parallel-beam tomography,

    N. T. Vo, R. C. Atwood, M. Drakopoulos, and T. Connolley, “Data processing methods and data acquisition for samples larger than the field of view in parallel-beam tomography,” Optics Express, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 17849–17874, 2021

    2021

  24. [31]

    Ad- vanced phase-contrast imaging using a grating interferometer,

    S. A. McDonald, F . Marone, C. Hinterm ¨uller, G. Mikuljan, C. David, F . Pfeiffer, and M. Stampanoni, “Ad- vanced phase-contrast imaging using a grating interferometer,” Journal of synchrotron radiation , vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 562–572, 2009

    2009

  25. [32]

    X-ray micro-ct with a displaced detector array,

    G. Wang, “X-ray micro-ct with a displaced detector array,” Medical physics, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1634–1636, 2002

    2002

  26. [33]

    Iterative reconstruction for circular cone-beam ct with an offset flat-panel detector,

    E. Hansis, J. Bredno, D. Sowards-Emmerd, and L. Shao, “Iterative reconstruction for circular cone-beam ct with an offset flat-panel detector,” inIEEE Nuclear Science Symposuim & Medical Imaging Conference, pp. 2228–2231, IEEE, 2010

    2010

  27. [34]

    Ex- tended imaging volume in cone-beam x-ray tomography using the weighted simultaneous iterative recon- struction technique,

    J. G. Sanctorum, S. Van Wassenbergh, V. Nguyen, J. De Beenhouwer, J. Sijbers, and J. J. Dirckx, “Ex- tended imaging volume in cone-beam x-ray tomography using the weighted simultaneous iterative recon- struction technique,” Physics in Medicine & Biology, vol. 66, no. 16, p. 16...

    2021

  28. [35]

    Practical cone-beam algorithm,

    L. A. Feldkamp, L. C. Davis, and J. W. Kress, “Practical cone-beam algorithm,” Josa a, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 612–619, 1984

    1984

  29. [36]

    A reconstruction method through projection data con- version under the displaced detector scanning for industrial cone-beam ct,

    Q. Lin, M. Y ang, Q. Wu, B. Tang, and X. Zhang, “A reconstruction method through projection data con- version under the displaced detector scanning for industrial cone-beam ct,”IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 66, no. 12, pp. 2364–2378, 2019

    2019

  30. [38]

    Extension of the cone-beam ct field-of-view using two short scans with displaced centers of rotation,

    G. Belotti, S. Rit, and G. Baroni, “Extension of the cone-beam ct field-of-view using two short scans with displaced centers of rotation,” in 7th International Conference on Image Formation in X-Ray Computed Tomography, vol. 12304, pp. 81–86, SPIE, 2022

    2022

  31. [39]

    Tracking based, high-resolution single-shot multimodal x-ray imaging in the laboratory enabled by the sub-pixel resolution capabilities of the m¨onch detector,

    E. Dreier, A. Bergamaschi, G. K. Kallon, R. Br ¨onnimann, U. L. Olsen, A. Olivo, and M. Endrizzi, “Tracking based, high-resolution single-shot multimodal x-ray imaging in the laboratory enabled by the sub-pixel resolution capabilities of the m¨onch detector,”Applied Physics Le...

    2020

  32. [40]

    X-ray phase-contrast microtomography of soft tissues using a compact laboratory system with two-directional sensitivity,

    C. Navarrete-Le ´on, A. Doherty, S. Savvidis, M. F . Gerli, G. Piredda, A. Astolfo, D. Bate, S. Cipiccia, C. K. Hagen, A. Olivo, et al., “X-ray phase-contrast microtomography of soft tissues using a compact laboratory system with two-directional sensitivity,”Optica, vol. 10, n...

    2023

  33. [41]

    A laboratory-based beam tracking x-ray imaging method achieving two-dimensional phase sensitivity and isotropic resolution with unidirectional undersampling,

    G. Lioliou, C. Navarrete-Le ´on, A. Astolfo, S. Savvidis, D. Bate, M. Endrizzi, C. Hagen, and A. Olivo, “A laboratory-based beam tracking x-ray imaging method achieving two-dimensional phase sensitivity and isotropic resolution with unidirectional undersampling,” Scientific Re...

    2023

  34. [42]

    Quantitative single-exposure x-ray phase contrast imaging using a single attenuation grid,

    K. S. Morgan, D. M. Paganin, and K. K. Siu, “Quantitative single-exposure x-ray phase contrast imaging using a single attenuation grid,” Optics express, vol. 19, no. 20, pp. 19781–19789, 2011

    2011

  35. [43]

    Single-shot x-ray differential phase-contrast and diffraction imaging using two-dimensional transmission gratings,

    H. H. Wen, E. E. Bennett, R. Kopace, A. F . Stein, and V. Pai, “Single-shot x-ray differential phase-contrast and diffraction imaging using two-dimensional transmission gratings,” Optics letters , vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 1932–1934, 2010

    1932

  36. [44]

    X-ray phase imaging with a paper analyzer,

    K. S. Morgan, D. M. Paganin, and K. K. Siu, “X-ray phase imaging with a paper analyzer,”Applied Physics Letters, vol. 100, no. 12, 2012

    2012

  37. [45]

    Two-dimensional x-ray beam phase sensing,

    S. B ´erujon, E. Ziegler, R. Cerbino, and L. Peverini, “Two-dimensional x-ray beam phase sensing,”Physical review letters, vol. 108, no. 15, p. 158102, 2012

    2012

  38. [46]

    A comparative study of sub-sampling methods in x-ray speckle interferometry based phase contrast imaging using synchrotron radiation source,

    Y . Kashyap, A. Agrawal, M. Shukla, H. Wang, and K. Sahwney, “A comparative study of sub-sampling methods in x-ray speckle interferometry based phase contrast imaging using synchrotron radiation source,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerato...

    2025

  39. [47]

    X-ray phase-contrast radiography and tomography with a multiaperture analyzer,

    M. Endrizzi, F . Vittoria, L. Rigon, D. Dreossi, F . Iacoviello, P . Shearing, and A. Olivo, “X-ray phase-contrast radiography and tomography with a multiaperture analyzer,” Physical review letters , vol. 118, no. 24, p. 243902, 2017. 12

    2017

  40. [48]

    Edge-illumination x-ray dark-field tomography,

    A. Doherty, S. Savvidis, C. Navarrete-Le´on, M. F . Gerli, A. Olivo, and M. Endrizzi, “Edge-illumination x-ray dark-field tomography,”Physical Review Applied, vol. 19, no. 5, p. 054042, 2023

    2023

  41. [49]

    The effect of the spatial sampling rate on quantitative phase information extracted from planar and tomographic edge illumination x-ray phase contrast images,

    C. Hagen, P . Diemoz, M. Endrizzi, and A. Olivo, “The effect of the spatial sampling rate on quantitative phase information extracted from planar and tomographic edge illumination x-ray phase contrast images,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 47, no. 45, p. 455401, 2014

    2014

  42. [50]

    Spatial resolution of edge illumination x-ray phase-contrast imaging,

    P . C. Diemoz, F . A. Vittoria, and A. Olivo, “Spatial resolution of edge illumination x-ray phase-contrast imaging,” Optics express, vol. 22, no. 13, pp. 15514–15529, 2014

    2014

  43. [51]

    Paganin et al., Coherent X-ray optics

    D. Paganin et al., Coherent X-ray optics. No. 6, Oxford University Press on Demand, 2006

    2006

  44. [52]

    Simultaneous phase and amplitude extraction from a single defocused image of a homogeneous object,

    D. Paganin, S. C. Mayo, T. E. Gureyev, P . R. Miller, and S. W. Wilkins, “Simultaneous phase and amplitude extraction from a single defocused image of a homogeneous object,” Journal of microscopy , vol. 206, no. 1, pp. 33–40, 2002

    2002

  45. [53]

    Laboratory-based x-ray phase contrast microscopy system for targeting in unstained soft-tissue samples,

    M. Esposito, N. Schieber, A. Olivo, Y . Schwab, and M. Endrizzi, “Laboratory-based x-ray phase contrast microscopy system for targeting in unstained soft-tissue samples,” Physical Review Research , vol. 7, no. 1, p. 013037, 2025

    2025

  46. [54]

    Phase- contrast x-ray tomography of neuronal tissue at laboratory sources with submicron resolution,

    M. Eckermann, M. T ¨opperwien, A.-L. Robisch, F . van der Meer, C. Stadelmann, and T. Salditt, “Phase- contrast x-ray tomography of neuronal tissue at laboratory sources with submicron resolution,” Journal of medical imaging, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 013502–013502, 2020

    2020

  47. [55]

    Fast and flexible x-ray tomography using the astra toolbox,

    W. Van Aarle, W. J. Palenstijn, J. Cant, E. Janssens, F . Bleichrodt, A. Dabravolski, J. De Beenhouwer, K. J. Batenburg, and J. Sijbers, “Fast and flexible x-ray tomography using the astra toolbox,” Optics express, vol. 24, no. 22, pp. 25129–25147, 2016

    2016

  48. [56]

    Cone-beam ct from width-truncated projections,

    P . S. Cho, A. D. Rudd, and R. H. Johnson, “Cone-beam ct from width-truncated projections,”Computerized medical imaging and graphics, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 49–57, 1996

    1996

  49. [57]

    Offset cone-beam ct reconstruction code

    H. Allan and M. Endrizzi, “Offset cone-beam ct reconstruction code.” https://github.com/Hallan99/ offset-cone-beam-CT-reconstruction , 2024

    2024

  50. [58]

    Thin-section ct features of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis correlated with micro-ct and histologic analysis,

    C. Mai, S. E. Verleden, J. E. McDonough, S. Willems, W. De Wever, J. Coolen, A. Dubbeldam, D. E. Van Raemdonck, E. K. Verbeken, G. M. Verleden,et al., “Thin-section ct features of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis correlated with micro-ct and histologic analysis,” Radiology, vol. ...

    2017

  51. [59]

    Tissue preparation techniques for contrast-enhanced micro computed to- mography imaging of large mammalian cardiac models with chronic disease,

    N. Pallares-Lupon, J. D. Bayer, B. Guillot, G. Caluori, G. S. Ramlugun, K. Kulkarni, V. Loyer, S. Bloquet, D. El Hamrani, J. Naulin,et al., “Tissue preparation techniques for contrast-enhanced micro computed to- mography imaging of large mammalian cardiac models with chronic d...

    2022

  52. [60]

    A new user facility with flexible multi-scale, multi-contrast micro-ct capabilities,

    O. R. i Morgo, Y . Jia, H. Allan, A. Doherty, C. Navarrete-Le´on, A. Astolfo, L. Jiang, J. D. Ferrara, and M. En- drizzi, “A new user facility with flexible multi-scale, multi-contrast micro-ct capabilities,” inDevelopments in X-Ray Tomography XV, vol. 13152, p. 1315209, SPIE, 2024

    2024

  53. [61]

    Spekpy v2. 0—a software toolkit for modeling x-ray tube spectra,

    G. Poludniowski, A. Omar, R. Bujila, and P . Andreo, “Spekpy v2. 0—a software toolkit for modeling x-ray tube spectra,” Medical Physics, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 3630–3637, 2021

    2021

  54. [62]

    Evaluation of automated airway morphological quantification for assessing fibrosing lung disease,

    A. Pakzad, W. K. Cheung, C. H. Van Moorsel, K. Quan, N. Mogulkoc, B. J. Bartholmai, H. W. Van Es, A. Ezircan, F . Van Beek, M. Veltkamp,et al., “Evaluation of automated airway morphological quantification for assessing fibrosing lung disease,” Computer Methods in Biomechanics ...

    2024

  55. [63]

    State of the art of x-ray speckle-based phase-contrast and dark-field imaging,

    M.-C. Zdora, “State of the art of x-ray speckle-based phase-contrast and dark-field imaging,” Journal of Imaging, vol. 4, no. 5, p. 60, 2018

    2018

  56. [64]

    Increasing the field of view in grating based x-ray phase contrast imaging using stitched gratings,

    J. Meiser, M. Willner, T. Schr ¨oter, A. Hofmann, J. Rieger, F . Koch, L. Birnbacher, M. Sch¨uttler, D. Kunka, P . Meyer,et al., “Increasing the field of view in grating based x-ray phase contrast imaging using stitched gratings,” Journal of X-ray science and technology, vol. ...

    2016

  57. [65]

    Large field-of-view tiled grating structures for x-ray phase-contrast imaging,

    T. J. Schr ¨oter, F . J. Koch, P . Meyer, D. Kunka, J. Meiser, K. Willer, L. Gromann, F . De Marco, J. Herzen, P . Noel,et al., “Large field-of-view tiled grating structures for x-ray phase-contrast imaging,” Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 88, no. 1, 2017. 13

    2017

  58. [66]

    Large field of view, fast and low dose multimodal phase-contrast imaging at high x-ray energy,

    A. Astolfo, M. Endrizzi, F . A. Vittoria, P . C. Diemoz, B. Price, I. Haig, and A. Olivo, “Large field of view, fast and low dose multimodal phase-contrast imaging at high x-ray energy,”Scientific reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 2187, 2017

    2017

  59. [67]

    X-ray dark-field imaging of the human lung—a feasibility study on a deceased body,

    K. Willer, A. A. Fingerle, L. B. Gromann, F . De Marco, J. Herzen, K. Achterhold, B. Gleich, D. Muenzel, K. Scherer, M. Renz,et al., “X-ray dark-field imaging of the human lung—a feasibility study on a deceased body,”PloS one, vol. 13, no. 9, p. e0204565, 2018

    2018

  60. [68]

    Dark-field computed tomography reaches the human scale,

    M. Viermetz, N. Gustschin, C. Schmid, J. Haeusele, M. von Teuffenbach, P . Meyer, F . Bergner, T. Lasser, R. Proksa, T. Koehler,et al., “Dark-field computed tomography reaches the human scale,”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 119, no. 8, p. e2118799119, 2022

    2022

  61. [69]

    Pepi lab: a flexible compact multi-modal setup for x-ray phase-contrast and spectral imaging,

    L. Brombal, F . Arfelli, R. H. Menk, L. Rigon, and F . Brun, “Pepi lab: a flexible compact multi-modal setup for x-ray phase-contrast and spectral imaging,”Scientific Reports, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 4206, 2023. 14

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.