REVIEW 1 cited by
Understanding Screenwriters' Practices, Attitudes, and Future Expectations in Human-AI Co-Creation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
With the rise of AI technologies and their growing influence in the screenwriting field, understanding the opportunities and concerns related to AI's role in screenwriting is essential for enhancing human-AI co-creation. Through semi-structured interviews with 23 screenwriters, we explored their creative practices, attitudes, and expectations in collaborating with AI for screenwriting. Based on participants' responses, we identified the key stages in which they commonly integrated AI, including story structure & plot development, screenplay text, goal & idea generation, and dialogue. Then, we examined how different attitudes toward AI integration influence screenwriters' practices across various workflow stages and their broader impact on the industry. Additionally, we categorized their expected assistance using four distinct roles of AI: actor, audience, expert, and executor. Our findings provide insights into AI's impact on screenwriting practices and offer suggestions on how AI can benefit the future of screenwriting.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
LLMs in Wikipedia: Investigating How LLMs Impact Participation in Knowledge Communities
Wikipedia editors who used LLMs reported that experienced editors expanded their contributions, while newcomers were pushed into editorial judgment they lacked skills for and saw their LLM-assisted edits rejected.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.