REVIEW 2 cited by
Approximate Equilibria in Nonconvex Markets: Theory and Evidence from European Electricity Auctions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
A fundamental challenge in the design of nonconvex markets is the absence of existence guarantees for Walrasian equilibria. Despite this lack of guarantees, we observed that the European day-ahead electricity auction attained equilibrium on approximately 80% of days during 2023 in some countries, while in others, it occurred on about 10% of days. By analysing auction microdata, we attribute these differences to varying ratios of divisible (convex) bids versus indivisible (nonconvex) ones. To provide a theoretical foundation for this empirical observation, we refine classical approximate equilibrium theorems to establish a link between the market share of nonconvex participants and the existence of (approximate) equilibria. These findings offer new insights into the conditions under which equilibria can emerge in practice and contribute to current policy discussions on the reform of the European electricity auction.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Does Financial Trading Smooth Non-Convex Markets?
Financial trading in non-convex electricity markets reduces the discriminatory side payments needed to sustain equilibrium, as confirmed by a PJM policy change that cut virtual bidding and raised side payments.
-
Package Bids in Combinatorial Electricity Auctions: Selection, Welfare Losses, and Alternatives
XOR package bid selection in electricity auctions can be solved as a linear program under finite package sets, and the welfare loss from bid limits is bounded by a Wasserstein distance between true and scenario price ...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.