Positionality of Dumont--Thomas numeration systems for integers
Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 01:30 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Conditions on the substitution make Dumont-Thomas numeration systems positional.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The paper exhibits conditions on the underlying substitution so that the corresponding Dumont-Thomas numeration is positional. It works first in the most general setting, then particularizes the results to some practical cases, and links the numeration systems to existing literature on numeration properties.
What carries the argument
Conditions on the substitution that guarantee existence of a sequence U determining word values from letter positions in the Dumont-Thomas system.
If this is right
- Under the conditions the value of any word can be read directly from its letters and their positions without traversing an automaton.
- The resulting systems satisfy the definition of positionality for the language of the substitution.
- Specialized substitutions produce explicit sequences U that work for all words.
- The positional property holds uniformly across the general case and the practical cases examined.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The same style of condition might identify positional cases inside wider classes of abstract numeration systems.
- Positional Dumont-Thomas representations could support direct algorithms for addition of the represented integers.
- The conditions may generate new families of positional bases usable for both natural numbers and integers.
Load-bearing premise
The numeration system is built exactly from the substitution by the standard construction and positionality requires the existence of such a sequence U.
What would settle it
A substitution that satisfies the stated conditions yet admits no sequence U that assigns the correct value to every word in the language.
Figures
read the original abstract
Introduced in 2001 by Lecomte and Rigo, abstract numeration systems provide a way of expressing natural numbers with words from a language $L$ accepted by a finite automaton. As it turns out, these numeration systems are not necessarily positional, i.e., we cannot always find a sequence $U=(U_i)_{i\ge 0}$ of integers such that the value of every word in the language $L$ is determined by the position of its letters and the first few values of $U$. Finding the conditions under which an abstract numeration system is positional seems difficult in general. In this paper, we thus consider this question for a particular sub-family of abstract numeration systems called Dumont--Thomas numeration systems. They are derived from substitutions and were introduced in 1989 by Dumont and Thomas. We exhibit conditions on the underlying substitution so that the corresponding Dumont--Thomas numeration is positional. We first work in the most general setting, then particularize our results to some practical cases. Finally, we link our numeration systems to existing literature, notably properties studied by R\'{e}nyi in 1957, Parry in 1960, Bertrand-Mathis in 1989, and Fabre in 1995
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript claims to exhibit conditions on substitutions such that the associated Dumont--Thomas numeration systems (constructed exactly as in Dumont--Thomas 1989) are positional, meaning the value of every word is determined by a fixed sequence U acting on letter positions. It proceeds from the general setting to particular cases and connects the systems to classical results of Rényi (1957), Parry (1960), Bertrand-Mathis (1989), and Fabre (1995).
Significance. If the exhibited conditions are correctly identified, proven, and verified with examples, the work would supply concrete criteria for positionality within this family of abstract numeration systems, clarifying the boundary between positional and non-positional cases and strengthening links to beta-numeration theory. The general-to-special progression and explicit ties to the cited literature are strengths.
major comments (1)
- [Abstract] The abstract asserts that conditions on the substitution are exhibited so that the Dumont--Thomas numeration is positional, yet the provided manuscript text contains neither the stated conditions, their proofs, nor any examples or verification. This prevents assessment of whether the central claim holds.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their report. We address the single major comment below.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Abstract] The abstract asserts that conditions on the substitution are exhibited so that the Dumont--Thomas numeration is positional, yet the provided manuscript text contains neither the stated conditions, their proofs, nor any examples or verification. This prevents assessment of whether the central claim holds.
Authors: The referee is correct: the submitted manuscript text does not contain the promised conditions on substitutions, their proofs, examples, or verification. We will revise the manuscript to include these elements (general setting, particular cases, and literature links) so that the central claim is fully supported. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No significant circularity in derivation chain
full rationale
The paper follows the standard 1989 Dumont-Thomas construction for numeration systems derived from substitutions and defines positionality exactly via existence of a sequence U determining word values from letter positions, matching external literature (Rényi, Parry, etc.). The central result exhibits conditions on substitutions making the system positional, without any reduction of predictions to fitted inputs, self-definitional loops, or load-bearing self-citations. All steps reference independent prior definitions and are self-contained against external benchmarks; no equations or claims collapse by construction to the paper's own inputs.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (2)
- domain assumption Dumont-Thomas numeration systems are derived from substitutions as introduced in 1989
- domain assumption Positionality means existence of an integer sequence U such that word value is determined by letter positions and initial U values
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Michael Baake and Uwe Grimm. Aperiodic order. Vol. 1 , volume 149 of Encyclope- dia of Mathematics and its Applications . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139025256
-
[2]
Valérie Berthé and Michel Rigo, editors. Combinatorics, Automata, and Number Theory , volume 135 of Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511777653
-
[3]
Comment écrire les nombres entie rs dans une base qui n’est pas entière
Anne Bertrand-Mathis. Comment écrire les nombres entie rs dans une base qui n’est pas entière. Acta Math. Hungar. , 54(3-4):237–241, 1989. doi:10.1007/BF01952053
-
[4]
Addition in Dumont-Thomas numeration systems in theory and practice , 2024
Olivier Carton, Jean-Michel Couvreur, Martin Delacour t, and Nicolas Ollinger. Addition in Dumont-Thomas numeration systems in theory and practice , 2024. Preprint available at https://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.09868
-
[5]
A full characterization of Bertrand numeration systems
Émilie Charlier, Célia Cisternino, and Manon Stipulant i. A full characterization of Bertrand numeration systems. In Developments in language theory , volume 13257 of Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci. , pages 102–114. Springer, Cham, 2022. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-05578-2\_8
-
[6]
Systèmes de numérat ion et fonctions fractales relatifs aux substitutions
Jean-Marie Dumont and Alain Thomas. Systèmes de numérat ion et fonctions fractales relatifs aux substitutions. Theoret. Comput. Sci. , 65(2):153–169, 1989. doi:10.1016/0304-3975(89)90041-8
-
[7]
Substitutions et β -systèmes de numération
Stéphane Fabre. Substitutions et β -systèmes de numération. Theoret. Comput. Sci. , 137(2):219–236, 1995. doi:10.1016/0304-3975(95)91132-A
-
[8]
String attractors of fixed points of k-Bonacci-like morphisms
France Gheeraert, Giuseppe Romana, and Manon Stipulant i. String attractors of fixed points of k-Bonacci-like morphisms. In Combinatorics on words , volume 13899 of Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci. , pages 192–205. Springer, Cham, 2023. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-33180-0\_15
-
[9]
String attractors of some simple-Parry automatic sequences
France Gheeraert, Giuseppe Romana, and Manon Stipulant i. String attractors of some simple-Parry automatic sequences. Theory Comput. Syst. , 68:1601–1621, 2024. doi:10.1007/s00224-024-10195-7
-
[10]
A Fibonacci analogue of the two’s complement nu- meration system
Sébastien Labbé and Jana Lepšová. A Fibonacci analogue of the two’s complement nu- meration system. RAIRO Theor. Inform. Appl. (RAIRO:ITA) , 57:Paper No. 12, 23, 2023. doi:10.1051/ita/2023007
-
[11]
Dumont-Thomas compl ement numeration systems for Z
Sébastien Labbé and Jana Lepšová. Dumont-Thomas compl ement numeration systems for Z. Integers, 24:Paper No. A112, 27, 2024. doi:10.5281/zenodo.14340125. 24
-
[12]
Pierre B. A. Lecomte and Michel Rigo. Numeration system s on a regular language. Theory Comput. Syst. , 34(1):27–44, 2001. doi:10.1007/s002240010014
-
[13]
Substitutive structures in combinatorics, number theory, and dis- crete geometry
Jana Lepšová. Substitutive structures in combinatorics, number theory, and dis- crete geometry . PhD Thesis, Université de Bordeaux and Czech Technical Uni - versity in Prague, 2024. A vailable online at https://theses.fr/2024BORD0083 or https://theses.hal.science/tel-04679032
work page 2024
-
[14]
Juan Marshall-Maldonado. Lyapunov exponents of the sp ectral cocycle for topological factors of bijective substitutions on two letters. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. , 44(7):2068–2092, 2024. doi:10.3934/dcds.2024019
-
[15]
Topo- logical mixing of random substitutions
Eden Delight Miro, Dan Rust, Lorenzo Sadun, and Gwendol yn Tadeo. Topo- logical mixing of random substitutions. Israel J. Math. , 255(1):123–153, 2023. doi:10.1007/s11856-022-2406-3
-
[16]
Automatic theorem proving in Walnut, 2 016
Hamoon Mousavi. Automatic theorem proving in Walnut, 2 016. Preprint available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.06017
-
[17]
William Parry. On the β -expansions of real numbers. Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hung. , 11:401– 416, 1960. doi:10.1007/BF02020954
-
[18]
Formal languages, automata and numeration systems
Michel Rigo. Formal languages, automata and numeration systems. Vol. 2 . Networks and Telecommunications Series. ISTE, London; John Wiley & Sons , Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 2014. Applications to recognizability and decidability. doi:10.1002/9781119042853
-
[19]
Alfréd Rényi. Representations for real numbers and the ir ergodic properties. Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hung. , 8(3-4):477–493, September 1957. doi:10.1007/BF02020331
-
[20]
Jeffrey Shallit. The logical approach to automatic sequences—exploring comb inatorics on words with Walnut, volume 482 of London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series . Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2023. doi:10.1017/9781108775267
-
[21]
Paul Surer. Substitutive number systems. Int. J. Number Theory , 16(8):1709–1751, 2020. doi:10.1142/S1793042120500906. 25
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.