Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Identifying Evidence Subgraphs for Financial Risk Detection via Graph Counterfactual and Factual Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.06441 v1 pith:PLZJMX6G submitted 2025-03-09 cs.CE

classification cs.CE
keywords companyfinancialgraphrisksattributiondetectionproposerisk
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Company financial risks pose a significant threat to personal wealth and national economic stability, stimulating increasing attention towards the development of efficient andtimely methods for monitoring them. Current approaches tend to use graph neural networks (GNNs) to model the momentum spillover effect of risks. However, due to the black-box nature of GNNs, these methods leave much to be improved for precise and reliable explanations towards company risks. In this paper, we propose CF3, a novel Counterfactual and Factual learning method for company Financial risk detection, which generates evidence subgraphs on company knowledge graphs to reliably detect and explain company financial risks. Specifically, we first propose a meta-path attribution process based on Granger causality, selecting the meta-paths most relevant to the target node labels to construct an attribution subgraph. Subsequently, we propose anedge-type-aware graph generator to identify important edges, and we also devise a layer-based feature masker to recognize crucial node features. Finally, we utilize counterfactual-factual reasoning and a loss function based on attribution subgraphs to jointly guide the learning of the graph generator and feature masker. Extensive experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate the superior performance of our method compared to state-of-the-art approaches in the field of financial risk detection.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Are Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks Truly Effective for Node Classification? A Causal Perspective

    cs.LG 2025-10 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A large benchmark suggests tuned RGCN matches complex HGNNs and heterogeneous graphs help mainly via homophily and local-global label discrepancy, but the causal analysis is circular.

Pith tools