pith. sign in

arxiv: 2503.07689 · v2 · submitted 2025-03-10 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Quantum phase diagram of the spin-frac{1}{2} Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the square-kagome lattice: a tensor network study

Saeed S. Jahromi , Yasir Iqbal This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 00:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords square-kagome latticeHeisenberg antiferromagnetvalence-bond crystalquantum phase diagramtensor networksfrustrated magnetismspin-1/2 model
0
0 comments X

The pith

The square-kagome Heisenberg antiferromagnet hosts four distinct valence-bond crystal phases at intermediate couplings.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper maps the full ground-state phase diagram of the spin-1/2 antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model on the square-kagome lattice by tuning the ratio of couplings on triangular and square plaquettes. Using infinite projected entangled-pair states, it identifies four nonmagnetic phases in the intermediate regime, each distinguished by unique patterns of strong and weak spin correlations that mark them as valence-bond crystals. Phase boundaries are located with correlation functions, entanglement measures, and spin gaps extracted from finite-field runs. At higher couplings the system enters ferrimagnetic order. These findings clarify previous uncertainties about the model's behavior.

Core claim

By varying the ratio of exchange interactions, the model exhibits four symmetry-distinct valence-bond crystal phases characterized by different arrangements of strong and weak bonds, separated from ferrimagnetic states at larger ratios.

What carries the argument

infinite projected entangled-pair states (iPEPS) ansatz, used to compute bond-resolved spin-spin correlations that reveal the symmetry-inequivalent patterns defining each VBC.

Load-bearing premise

The extrapolated iPEPS wavefunction accurately captures the thermodynamic-limit ground state without artifacts from finite bond dimension affecting the observed correlation patterns.

What would settle it

A calculation with significantly larger bond dimension that finds merging of the four phases into fewer distinct correlation patterns would falsify the claim of four separate VBCs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2503.07689 by Saeed S. Jahromi, Yasir Iqbal.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) The translation invariant unit cell of the square-kagome [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Quantum phase diagram of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) The bond entanglement entropy, computed from singular value bond matrices of the iPEPS simple update. Vertical dashed lines [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Scaling of the energy per site versus the inverse bond dimen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The crossed-dimer spin-spin correlation on the horizontal and vertical diamonds of the square-kagome lattice. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) The 24-site unit cell of the square-kagome lattice with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the ground-state phase diagram of the spin-$1/2$ antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model on the square-kagome lattice using infinite projected entangled-pair states (iPEPS). By systematically varying the ratio of exchange couplings on triangular and square plaquettes, we establish a complete quantum phase diagram in the thermodynamic limit. In the intermediate-coupling regime, we identify four distinct nonmagnetic phases that are unambiguously characterized as valence-bond crystals (VBCs) by their symmetry-inequivalent patterns of strong and weak spin-spin correlations. These include a plaquette crossed-dimer VBC, a loop-six VBC stabilized around the isotropic point, a generalized pinwheel VBC with reduced rotational symmetry, and a decorated loop-six VBC proximate to ferrimagnetic order. We determine the phase boundaries using a combination of bond-resolved correlation functions, entanglement entropy, and magnetization. For transitions not accompanied by sharp entanglement signatures, we extract the spin gap from finite-field simulations, allowing us to distinguish gapped and gapless VBC phases. At larger coupling ratios, the system undergoes transitions into imperfect and perfect ferrimagnetic states. Our results resolve long-standing ambiguities in the square-kagome Heisenberg model and provide a quantitatively reliable reference for future theoretical and experimental studies of frustrated quantum magnets.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses infinite projected entangled-pair states (iPEPS) to determine the ground-state phase diagram of the spin-1/2 antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model on the square-kagome lattice as a function of the ratio between triangular and square plaquette couplings. In the intermediate-coupling regime it reports four distinct nonmagnetic phases, each identified as a valence-bond crystal (VBC) on the basis of symmetry-inequivalent patterns of strong and weak bond-resolved spin-spin correlations; these are supplemented by entanglement-entropy and finite-field gap data to locate boundaries and to distinguish gapped from gapless VBCs. At larger coupling ratios the system enters imperfect and perfect ferrimagnetic states.

Significance. A converged iPEPS phase diagram for this lattice would resolve long-standing ambiguities in the square-kagome Heisenberg model and supply a quantitative benchmark for both theory and experiment. The thermodynamic-limit access afforded by iPEPS is a clear methodological strength, provided the reported correlation patterns survive bond-dimension extrapolation.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (VBC identification): the central claim that four phases are 'unambiguously characterized as VBCs by their symmetry-inequivalent patterns of strong and weak spin-spin correlations' rests on finite-D iPEPS data. No explicit D→∞ extrapolation of the bond-resolved correlation functions or of the entanglement entropy is shown for the four candidate VBCs; without this, it remains possible that the observed inequivalent patterns are truncation artifacts, especially near the reported phase boundaries where the spin gap is small.
  2. [§3.2] §3.2 (finite-field gap extraction): the distinction between gapped and gapless VBC phases is made by extracting the spin gap from magnetization curves at finite magnetic field. The procedure for extrapolating these gaps to D→∞ and to zero field is not detailed; a systematic finite-D scaling analysis of the gap would be required to confirm that the reported gapped/gapless assignments are not affected by the same truncation bias that may affect the correlation patterns.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 2] Figure 2: the color scale for the bond-resolved correlations should be stated explicitly so that the reader can judge the contrast between 'strong' and 'weak' bonds used to label the four VBCs.
  2. [Introduction] The definition of the 'isotropic point' (J△/J□ = 1) is used without a numerical value; adding the precise ratio in the text would remove ambiguity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments, which help strengthen the presentation of our iPEPS results. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the requested analyses into the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (VBC identification): the central claim that four phases are 'unambiguously characterized as VBCs by their symmetry-inequivalent patterns of strong and weak spin-spin correlations' rests on finite-D iPEPS data. No explicit D→∞ extrapolation of the bond-resolved correlation functions or of the entanglement entropy is shown for the four candidate VBCs; without this, it remains possible that the observed inequivalent patterns are truncation artifacts, especially near the reported phase boundaries where the spin gap is small.

    Authors: We agree that explicit D→∞ extrapolations of the bond-resolved spin-spin correlations and entanglement entropy for the four VBC phases would strengthen the claim against possible truncation artifacts. Although the patterns were observed to be stable across the bond dimensions employed in our calculations, the original manuscript did not include the full extrapolation plots. In the revised version we will add these extrapolations for each VBC phase, including data near the phase boundaries, to demonstrate that the symmetry-inequivalent bond patterns persist in the infinite-D limit. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 (finite-field gap extraction): the distinction between gapped and gapless VBC phases is made by extracting the spin gap from magnetization curves at finite magnetic field. The procedure for extrapolating these gaps to D→∞ and to zero field is not detailed; a systematic finite-D scaling analysis of the gap would be required to confirm that the reported gapped/gapless assignments are not affected by the same truncation bias that may affect the correlation patterns.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the extrapolation procedure for the spin gaps extracted from finite-field magnetization curves was not described in sufficient detail. In the revised manuscript we will include a systematic finite-D scaling analysis, presenting the gap values versus 1/D together with the fitting procedures used to extrapolate both to D→∞ and to zero field. This will confirm that the gapped versus gapless assignments remain robust. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in numerical phase-diagram study

full rationale

The paper performs a direct iPEPS variational study of the Heisenberg model on the square-kagome lattice by varying the external coupling ratio J and extracting observables (bond-resolved correlations, entanglement entropy, magnetization, finite-field gaps). Phase identification follows from these computed quantities without any reduction of a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter, without self-definitional equations, and without load-bearing self-citations that substitute for independent verification. The central claim (four distinct VBCs distinguished by symmetry-inequivalent correlation patterns) is obtained by explicit computation rather than by construction from the inputs. This is the normal, non-circular outcome for a parameter-sweep numerical exploration.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that iPEPS accurately captures 2D quantum ground states and that correlation patterns suffice to label distinct symmetry-broken VBC phases; no free parameters are fitted to data in the reported sense, but the bond dimension acts as a controllable truncation.

free parameters (1)
  • iPEPS bond dimension
    Truncation parameter whose extrapolation is required for thermodynamic-limit claims; value not reported in abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The infinite projected entangled-pair state ansatz converges to the true ground state of local 2D Hamiltonians when bond dimension is increased sufficiently.
    Invoked implicitly by the use of iPEPS to determine the phase diagram in the thermodynamic limit.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5775 in / 1302 out tokens · 56114 ms · 2026-05-23T00:39:49.854965+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Savary and L

    L. Savary and L. Balents, Quantum spin liquids: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 016502 (2016)

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature (London) 464, 199 (2010)

    L. Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature (London) 464, 199 (2010)

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    Anderson, Resonating valence bonds: A new kind of insula- tor?, Mater

    P. Anderson, Resonating valence bonds: A new kind of insula- tor?, Mater. Res. Bull. 8, 153 (1973)

    work page 1973

  4. [4]

    Moessner and S

    R. Moessner and S. L. Sondhi, Resonating Valence Bond Phase in the Triangular Lattice Quantum Dimer Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1881 (2001)

    work page 2001

  5. [5]

    J. T. Chalker, P. C. W. Holdsworth, and E. F. Shender, Hid- den order in a frustrated system: Properties of the Heisenberg Kagom´e antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 855 (1992)

    work page 1992

  6. [6]

    D. A. Huse and A. D. Rutenberg, Classical antiferromagnets on the Kagom´e lattice, Phys. Rev. B 45, 7536 (1992)

    work page 1992

  7. [7]

    J. N. Reimers and A. J. Berlinsky, Order by disorder in the classical Heisenberg kagom´e antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B48, 9539 (1993)

    work page 1993

  8. [8]

    Richter, J

    J. Richter, J. Schulenburg, P. Tomczak, and D. Schmalfuß, The Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the square-kagom´e lattice, Con- dens. Matter Phys. 12, 507 (2009)

    work page 2009

  9. [9]

    J. B. Marston and C. Zeng, Spin-Peierls and spin-liquid phases of Kagom´e quantum antiferromagnets, J. Appl. Phys. 69, 5962 (1991)

    work page 1991

  10. [10]

    Mila, Low-Energy Sector of the S = 1/2 Kagome Antifer- romagnet, Phys

    F. Mila, Low-Energy Sector of the S = 1/2 Kagome Antifer- romagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2356 (1998)

    work page 1998

  11. [11]

    M. B. Hastings, Dirac structure, RVB, and Goldstone modes in the kagom´e antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 63, 014413 (2000)

    work page 2000

  12. [12]

    Nikolic and T

    P. Nikolic and T. Senthil, Physics of low-energy singlet states of the Kagome lattice quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 68, 214415 (2003)

    work page 2003

  13. [13]

    R. R. P. Singh and D. A. Huse, Ground state of the spin-1/2 kagome-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 76, 180407 (2007)

    work page 2007

  14. [14]

    S. Yan, D. A. Huse, and S. R. White, Spin-Liquid Ground State of the S = 1/2 Kagome Heisenberg Antiferromagnet, Science 332, 1173 (2011)

    work page 2011

  15. [15]

    Depenbrock, I

    S. Depenbrock, I. P. McCulloch, and U. Schollw ¨ock, Nature of the Spin-Liquid Ground State of the S = 1 /2 Heisenberg 6 〈 S i . S j 〉 (horizontal) −0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0 0.2 J/J 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 H 1 H 2 H 3 H 4 〈 S i . S j 〉 (vertical) −0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0 0.2 0.4 J/J 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 V 1 V 2 V 3 V 4 FIG. 5. ...

    work page 2012

  16. [16]

    Khuntia, M

    P. Khuntia, M. Velazquez, Q. Barth ´elemy, F. Bert, E. Kermar- rec, A. Legros, B. Bernu, L. Messio, A. Zorko, and P. Mendels, Gapless ground state in the archetypal quantum kagome anti- ferromagnet ZnCu3(OH)6Cl2, Nat. Phys. 16, 469 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    Y . Ran, M. Hermele, P. A. Lee, and X.-G. Wen, Projected- Wave-Function Study of the Spin-1/2 Heisenberg Model on the Kagom´e Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 117205 (2007)

    work page 2007

  18. [18]

    Iqbal, F

    Y . Iqbal, F. Becca, S. Sorella, and D. Poilblanc, Gapless spin- liquid phase in the kagome spin-1 2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 87, 060405 (2013)

    work page 2013

  19. [19]

    Iqbal, D

    Y . Iqbal, D. Poilblanc, and F. Becca, Vanishing spin gap in a competing spin-liquid phase in the kagome Heisenberg antifer- romagnet, Phys. Rev. B 89, 020407 (2014)

    work page 2014

  20. [20]

    Y .-C. He, M. P. Zaletel, M. Oshikawa, and F. Pollmann, Signa- tures of Dirac Cones in a DMRG Study of the Kagome Heisen- berg Model, Phys. Rev. X 7, 031020 (2017)

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    H. J. Liao, Z. Y . Xie, J. Chen, Z. Y . Liu, H. D. Xie, R. Z. Huang, B. Normand, and T. Xiang, Gapless Spin-Liquid Ground State in the S = 1/2 Kagome Antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 137202 (2017)

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    Siddharthan and A

    R. Siddharthan and A. Georges, Square kagome quantum an- tiferromagnet and the eight-vertex model, Phys. Rev. B 65, 014417 (2001)

    work page 2001

  23. [23]

    Fujihala, K

    M. Fujihala, K. Morita, R. Mole, S. Mitsuda, T. Tohyama, S.-i. Yano, D. Yu, S. Sota, T. Kuwai, A. Koda, H. Okabe, H. Lee, S. Itoh, T. Hawai, T. Masuda, H. Sagayama, A. Matsuo, K. Kindo, S. Ohira-Kawamura, and K. Nakajima, Gapless spin liquid in a square-kagome lattice antiferromagnet, Nat. Com- mun. 11, 3429 (2020)

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    T. Goto, M. Fujihala, and S. Mitsuda, 27Al-NMR study on a square-kagome lattice antiferromagnet, Interactions 245, 40 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Markina, P

    M. Markina, P. Berdonosov, T. Vasilchikova, K. Zakharov, A. Murtazoev, V . Dolgikh, A. Moskin, V . Glazkov, A. Smirnov, and A. Vasiliev, Static and resonant properties of decorated square kagom ´e lattice KCu 7(TeO4)(SO4)5Cl, Mater. Chem. Phys. 319, 129348 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    O. V . Yakubovich, L. V . Shvanskaya, G. V . Kiriukhina, A. S. V olkov, O. V . Dimitrova, and A. N. Vasiliev, Hy- drothermal Synthesis and a Composite Crystal Structure of Na6Cu7BiO4(PO4)4[Cl,(OH)]3 as a Candidate for Quantum Spin Liquid, Inorg. Chem. 60, 11450 (2021)

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    B. Liu, Z. Zeng, A. Xu, Y . Sun, O. Yakubovich, L. Shvan- skaya, S. Li, and A. Vasiliev, Low-temperature specific-heat studies on two square-kagome antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 105, 155153 (2022). 7

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    A. F. Murtazoev, K. A. Lyssenko, M. M. Markina, V . A. Dol- gikh, A. N. Vasiliev, and P. S. Berdonosov, New Nabokoite-like Phases ACu7TeO4(SO4)5Cl (A=Na, K, Rb, Cs) with Decorated and Distorted Square Kagome Lattices, Chem. Phys. Chem.24, e202300111 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Rebrov, V

    Y . Rebrov, V . Glazkov, A. Murtazoev, V . Dolgikh, and P. Berdonosov, High-frequency dielectric anomalies in a highly frustrated square kagom ´e lattice nabokoite family compounds ACu7TeO4(SO4)5Cl (A=Na, K, Rb, Cs), J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 592, 171786 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Niggemann, N

    N. Niggemann, N. Astrakhantsev, A. Ralko, F. Ferrari, A. Maity, T. M ¨uller, J. Richter, R. Thomale, T. Neupert, J. Reuther, Y . Iqbal, and H. O. Jeschke, Quantum para- magnetism in the decorated square-kagome antiferromagnet Na6Cu7BiO4(PO4)4Cl3, Phys. Rev. B 108, L241117 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    M. G. Gonzalez, Y . Iqbal, J. Reuther, and H. O. Jeschke, Field-induced spin liquid in the decorated square-kagome antiferromagnet nabokoite KCu 7TeO4(SO4)5Cl (2024), arXiv:2410.10385 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Morita and T

    K. Morita and T. Tohyama, Magnetic phase diagrams and mag- netization plateaus of the spin-1/2 antiferromagnetic Heisen- berg model on a square-Kagome lattice with three nonequiv- alent exchange interactions, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 87, 043704 (2018)

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    Lugan, L

    T. Lugan, L. D. C. Jaubert, and A. Ralko, Topological nematic spin liquid on the square Kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. Research 1, 033147 (2019)

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    Rousochatzakis, R

    I. Rousochatzakis, R. Moessner, and J. van den Brink, Frus- trated magnetism and resonating valence bond physics in two- dimensional kagome-like magnets, Phys. Rev. B 88, 195109 (2013)

    work page 2013

  35. [35]

    Ralko and I

    A. Ralko and I. Rousochatzakis, Resonating-valence-bond physics is not always governed by the shortest tunneling loops, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 167202 (2015)

    work page 2015

  36. [36]

    Schmoll, A

    P. Schmoll, A. Kshetrimayum, J. Naumann, J. Eisert, and Y . Iqbal, Tensor network study of the spin- 1 2 Heisenberg an- tiferromagnet on the shuriken lattice, Phys. Rev. B107, 064406 (2023)

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Or ´us, A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states, Ann

    R. Or ´us, A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states, Ann. Phys. (N. Y .)349, 117 (2014)

    work page 2014

  38. [38]

    Or ´us, Advances on tensor network theory: symmetries, fermions, entanglement, and holography, Eur

    R. Or ´us, Advances on tensor network theory: symmetries, fermions, entanglement, and holography, Eur. Phys. J. B 87, 280 (2014)

    work page 2014

  39. [39]

    Verstraete, V

    F. Verstraete, V . Murg, and J. Cirac, Matrix product states, projected entangled pair states, and variational renormalization group methods for quantum spin systems, Adv. Phys. 57, 143 (2008)

    work page 2008

  40. [40]

    Or ´us and G

    R. Or ´us and G. Vidal, Simulation of two-dimensional quantum systems on an infinite lattice revisited: Corner transfer matrix for tensor contraction, Phys. Rev. B 80, 094403 (2009)

    work page 2009

  41. [41]

    H. N. Phien, J. A. Bengua, H. D. Tuan, P. Corboz, and R. Or´us, Infinite projected entangled pair states algorithm improved: Fast full update and gauge fixing, Phys. Rev. B 92, 035142 (2015)

    work page 2015

  42. [42]

    S. S. Jahromi, R. Or ´us, M. Kargarian, and A. Langari, Infinite projected entangled-pair state algorithm for ruby and triangle- honeycomb lattices, Phys. Rev. B 97, 115161 (2018)

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    H. C. Jiang, Z. Y . Weng, and T. Xiang, Accurate Determination of Tensor Network State of Quantum Lattice Models in Two Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 090603 (2008)

    work page 2008

  44. [44]

    Nishino and K

    T. Nishino and K. Okunishi, Corner Transfer Matrix Renormal- ization Group Method, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65, 891 (1996)

    work page 1996

  45. [45]

    S. S. Jahromi, R. Or ´us, D. Poilblanc, and F. Mila, Spin- 1 2 kagome Heisenberg antiferromagnet with strong breathing anisotropy, SciPost Phys. 9, 092 (2020)

    work page 2020

  46. [46]

    Astrakhantsev, F

    N. Astrakhantsev, F. Ferrari, N. Niggemann, T. M ¨uller, A. Chauhan, A. Kshetrimayum, P. Ghosh, N. Regnault, R. Thomale, J. Reuther, T. Neupert, and Y . Iqbal, Pinwheel va- lence bond crystal ground state of the spin- 1 2 Heisenberg anti- ferromagnet on the shuriken lattice, Phys. Rev. B104, L220408 (2021)

    work page 2021

  47. [47]

    Richter and J

    J. Richter and J. Schnack, Magnetism of the S = 1 2 J1 − J2 square-kagome lattice antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 107, 245115 (2023)

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    E. H. Lieb, Two theorems on the Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1201 (1989)

    work page 1989

  49. [49]

    X.-Y . Song, C. Wang, A. Vishwanath, and Y .-C. He, Unifying description of competing orders in two-dimensional quantum magnets, Nat. Commun. 10, 4254 (2019)

    work page 2019

  50. [50]

    Budaraju, Y

    S. Budaraju, Y . Iqbal, F. Becca, and D. Poilblanc, Piercing the Dirac spin liquid: From a single monopole to chiral states, Phys. Rev. B 108, L201116 (2023)

    work page 2023

  51. [51]

    Budaraju, A

    S. Budaraju, A. Parola, Y . Iqbal, F. Becca, and D. Poilblanc, Monopole excitations in the U(1) Dirac spin liquid on the tri- angular lattice (2024), arXiv:2410.18747 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    Iqbal, F

    Y . Iqbal, F. Becca, and D. Poilblanc, Valence-bond crystal in the extended kagome spin-1 2 quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet: A variational Monte Carlo approach, Phys. Rev. B 83, 100404 (2011)

    work page 2011

  53. [53]

    Iqbal, F

    Y . Iqbal, F. Becca, and D. Poilblanc, Valence-bond crystals in the kagom´e spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet: a symmetry classification and projected wave function study, New J. Phys. 14, 115031 (2012)

    work page 2012

  54. [54]

    Iqbal, D

    Y . Iqbal, D. Poilblanc, R. Thomale, and F. Becca, Persistence of the gapless spin liquid in the breathing kagome Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 97, 115127 (2018)

    work page 2018

  55. [55]

    Tomczak and J

    P. Tomczak and J. Richter, Specific heat of the spin- Heisen- berg antiferromagnet on Squagome lattice, J. Phys. A 36, 5399 (2003)

    work page 2003

  56. [56]

    Nakano and T

    H. Nakano and T. Sakai, The two-dimensional S=1/2 Heisen- berg antiferromagnet on the Shuriken lattice – a lattice com- posed of vertex-sharing triangles, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 82, 083709 (2013)

    work page 2013

  57. [57]

    Derzhko, J

    O. Derzhko, J. Richter, O. Krupnitska, and T. Krokhmalskii, The square-kagome quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet at high magnetic fields: The localized-magnon paradigm and be- yond, Low Temp. Phys. 40, 513 (2014)

    work page 2014

  58. [58]

    Hasegawa, H

    Y . Hasegawa, H. Nakano, and T. Sakai, Metamagnetic jump in the spin- 1 2 antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model on the square kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. B 98, 014404 (2018)

    work page 2018

  59. [59]

    Richter, O

    J. Richter, O. Derzhko, and J. Schnack, Thermodynamics of the spin-half square kagome lattice antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 105, 144427 (2022)

    work page 2022

  60. [60]

    Schmoll, H

    P. Schmoll, H. O. Jeschke, and Y . Iqbal, Tensor network analysis of the maple-leaf antiferromagnet spangolite (2024), arXiv:2404.14905 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    Gemb ´e, H.-J

    M. Gemb ´e, H.-J. Schmidt, C. Hickey, J. Richter, Y . Iqbal, and S. Trebst, Noncoplanar magnetic order in classical square- kagome antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 043204 (2023)

    work page 2023

  62. [62]

    K. B. Yogendra, S. Karmakar, and T. Das, Symmetry, super- position, and fragmentation in classical spin liquids: A general framework and applications to square kagome magnets, Phys. Rev. B 110, L060401 (2024)

    work page 2024