REVIEW 1 cited by
ExplainitAI: When do we trust artificial intelligence? The influence of content and explainability in a cross-cultural comparison
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This study investigates cross-cultural differences in the perception of AI-driven chatbots between Germany and South Korea, focusing on topic dependency and explainability. Using a custom AI chat interface, ExplainitAI, we systematically examined these factors with quota-based samples from both countries (N = 297). Our findings revealed significant cultural distinctions: Korean participants exhibited higher trust, more positive user experience ratings, and more favorable perception of AI compared to German participants. Additionally, topic dependency was a key factor, with participants reporting lower trust in AI when addressing societally debated topics (e.g., migration) versus health or entertainment topics. These perceptions were further influenced by interactions among cultural context, content domains, and explainability conditions. The result highlights the importance of integrating cultural and contextual nuances into the design of AI systems, offering actionable insights for the development of culturally adaptive and explainable AI tailored to diverse user needs and expectations across domains.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Generating Proto-Personas through Prompt Engineering: A Case Study on Efficiency, Effectiveness and Empathy
A prompt-engineering approach to proto-persona generation, evaluated with 19 practitioners in a real Lean Inception, reduced creation time to about six minutes and was well accepted, but affective and behavioral empat...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.