pith. sign in

arxiv: 2503.17986 · v1 · submitted 2025-03-23 · ⚛️ physics.optics · physics.app-ph

Subvolt high-speed free-space modulator with electro-optic metasurface

Go Soma , Koto Ariu , Seidai Karakida , Yusuke Tsubai , Takuo Tanemura This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 22:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics physics.app-ph
keywords electro-optic metasurfacequasi-bound state in the continuumfree-space optical modulatorsubvolt modulationsilicon-organic hybridhigh-speed modulationCMOS-compatible voltage
0
0 comments X

The pith

A high-Q resonance in a silicon-organic metasurface traps light to enable subvolt free-space modulation at gigabit speeds.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that a dimerized-grating silicon metasurface embedding an organic electro-optic material can trap normally incident light inside a submicrometer slot by means of a high-Q quasi-bound state in the continuum. This confinement produces efficient phase or amplitude modulation at driving voltages of 0.2 V for 50 Mbps transmission and 1 V for 1.6 Gbps transmission. Because these voltages match standard CMOS levels, the approach removes the main barrier that has kept ultrathin metasurface modulators from practical use in free-space links, LiDAR, and optical computing.

Core claim

Active metasurfaces that incorporate electro-optic materials have been limited by short interaction lengths that force driving voltages above tens of volts. By designing dimerized-grating nanostructures that support a high-Q quasi-bound state in the continuum, normally incident light is trapped inside a submicrometer-scale silicon slot filled with organic EO material, yielding modulation depths sufficient for 50 Mbps at 0.2 V and 1.6 Gbps at 1 V while remaining compatible with CMOS voltage rails.

What carries the argument

high-Q quasi-bound state in the continuum formed by dimerized-grating silicon-organic-hybrid nanostructures that confines light to the EO-filled slot region

If this is right

  • Data transmission reaches 50 Mbps with only 0.2 V applied across the metasurface.
  • The same device supports 1.6 Gbps when driven at 1 V.
  • All reported operating voltages lie within standard CMOS supply ranges.
  • The architecture opens a route to energy-efficient active metasurfaces for free-space communication, sensing, and computing.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Integration with existing silicon electronics could produce compact, low-power free-space optical transmitters without separate high-voltage drivers.
  • The same light-trapping principle might be adapted to other EO materials or wavelengths to address different speed or loss requirements.
  • If the resonance remains stable under thermal or environmental variation, the modulators could be deployed in outdoor or mobile platforms where power budgets are tight.

Load-bearing premise

The fabricated nanostructures produce the claimed high-Q resonance and light-trapping efficiency without major losses from fabrication errors, material absorption, or misalignment.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of the resonance linewidth or modulation depth at 0.2 V drive that falls well below the values needed to reach the reported data rates.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2503.17986 by Go Soma, Koto Ariu, Seidai Karakida, Takuo Tanemura, Yusuke Tsubai.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Metasurface modulator with an all-dielectric SOH dimerized resonator. a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Passive characterization of the fabricated devices. a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Active modulation of free-space light. a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: High-speed modulation using an ultra-small DBR-integrated device. a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Benchmark comparison of this work against [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Active metasurfaces incorporating electro-optic (EO) materials enable high-speed free-space optical modulators that show great promise for a wide range of emerging applications, including free-space optical communication, light detection and ranging, and optical computing. However, the limited light-matter interaction lengths in ultrathin metasurfaces typically require high driving voltages exceeding tens of volts. Here we present ultralow-voltage, high-speed free-space optical modulators based on silicon-organic-hybrid metasurfaces with dimerized-grating-based nanostructures. By exploiting a high-Q quasi-bound state in the continuum, normally incident light is effectively trapped within a submicrometer-scale silicon slot region embedded with organic EO material. Consequently, highly efficient modulation is obtained, enabling data transmission at 50 Mbps and 1.6 Gbps with driving voltages of only 0.2 V and 1 V, respectively. These unprecedented metasurface modulators operating at complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS)-compatible voltage levels provide the pathway toward energy-efficient high-speed active metasurface devices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the design, fabrication, and characterization of a silicon-organic-hybrid metasurface free-space optical modulator. By using dimerized-grating nanostructures to support a high-Q quasi-bound state in the continuum, normally incident light is trapped in a sub-micrometer silicon slot filled with an organic electro-optic material, enabling data transmission at 50 Mbps with 0.2 V drive and 1.6 Gbps with 1 V drive.

Significance. If the experimental results are robust, the work would establish a route to CMOS-compatible voltage levels in ultrathin active metasurfaces, which has been a longstanding barrier for free-space EO modulators. The quasi-BIC approach for enhancing light-matter interaction in sub-micron EO regions is a concrete advance with potential relevance to optical interconnects and computing.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results and Discussion] The central experimental claim (0.2 V / 50 Mbps and 1 V / 1.6 Gbps) rests on the fabricated device realizing the simulated high-Q resonance and field overlap. The manuscript must provide direct comparison of measured resonance linewidth, Q-factor, and modulation depth versus the design values, including error bars and device-to-device statistics, to rule out degradation from sidewall roughness, slot-width variation, or material absorption.
  2. [Methods] Fabrication details (e.g., etching uniformity, organic-material infiltration yield, electrode alignment) and any post-fabrication characterization (SEM, AFM) are needed to quantify how closely the realized geometry matches the ideal dimerized-grating parameters used in the quasi-BIC simulation.
minor comments (2)
  1. Figure captions should explicitly state the driving voltage and bit rate for each eye diagram or modulation trace.
  2. The abstract and introduction use “subvolt” and “ultralow-voltage” interchangeably; consistent terminology would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and positive assessment of the significance of our work. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested information.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results and Discussion] The central experimental claim (0.2 V / 50 Mbps and 1 V / 1.6 Gbps) rests on the fabricated device realizing the simulated high-Q resonance and field overlap. The manuscript must provide direct comparison of measured resonance linewidth, Q-factor, and modulation depth versus the design values, including error bars and device-to-device statistics, to rule out degradation from sidewall roughness, slot-width variation, or material absorption.

    Authors: We agree that a direct comparison of measured versus simulated resonance properties is necessary to substantiate the experimental claims. In the revised manuscript, we will add a dedicated subsection and figure in Results and Discussion that overlays measured transmission spectra with simulations, reports extracted linewidths and Q-factors (with error bars from repeated spectral scans), and shows modulation depth versus voltage. Device-to-device statistics from multiple devices will be included to quantify reproducibility and address possible fabrication-induced effects such as sidewall roughness or slot-width variation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods] Fabrication details (e.g., etching uniformity, organic-material infiltration yield, electrode alignment) and any post-fabrication characterization (SEM, AFM) are needed to quantify how closely the realized geometry matches the ideal dimerized-grating parameters used in the quasi-BIC simulation.

    Authors: We will expand the Methods section with additional fabrication details, including etching uniformity metrics, organic-material infiltration yield across devices, and electrode alignment tolerances. We will also include representative SEM and AFM images accompanied by quantitative measurements of grating dimensions, slot width, and surface roughness, with direct numerical comparison to the ideal parameters employed in the quasi-BIC simulations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental demonstration without derivation chain

full rationale

The paper reports fabrication and measured performance of a silicon-organic-hybrid metasurface modulator exploiting a quasi-BIC resonance. No equations, parameter fitting, predictions, or first-principles derivations are described in the provided text. The central claims rest on experimental results (modulation depths at stated voltages and bit rates), which are not shown to reduce to inputs by construction. This matches the reader's assessment of score 1.0 and qualifies as a self-contained experimental report with no load-bearing circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be identified from the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5719 in / 1011 out tokens · 63773 ms · 2026-05-22T22:32:42.892557+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    N. Yu, P. Genevet, M. A. Kats, F. Aieta, J.-P. Tetienne, F. Ca- passo, and Z. Gaburro, Light propagation with phase discon- tinuities: generalized laws of reflection and refraction, Science 334, 333 (2011)

    work page 2011

  2. [2]

    D. Lin, P. Fan, E. Hasman, and M. L. Brongersma, Dielec- tric gradient metasurface optical elements, Science 345, 298 (2014)

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    Khorasaninejad and F

    M. Khorasaninejad and F. Capasso, Metalenses: Versatile multifunctional photonic components, Science 358, eaam8100 (2017)

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Arbabi and A

    A. Arbabi and A. Faraon, Advances in optical metalenses, Nat. Photonics 17, 16 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    A. I. Kuznetsov, M. L. Brongersma, J. Yao, M. K. Chen, U. Levy, D. P. Tsai, N. I. Zheludev, A. Faraon, A. Arbabi, N. Yu, D. Chanda, K. B. Crozier, A. V. Kildishev, H. Wang, J. K. W. Yang, J. G. Valentine, P. Genevet, J. A. Fan, O. D. Miller, A. Majumdar, J. E. Fr¨ och, D. Brady, F. Heide, A. Veer- araghavan, N. Engheta, A. Al` u, A. Polman, H. A. Atwater,...

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    W. T. Chen, A. Y. Zhu, V. Sanjeev, M. Khorasaninejad, Z. Shi, E. Lee, and F. Capasso, A broadband achromatic metalens for focusing and imaging in the visible, Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 220 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    S. Wang, P. C. Wu, V.-C. Su, Y.-C. Lai, M.-K. Chen, H. Y. Kuo, B. H. Chen, Y. H. Chen, T.-T. Huang, J.-H. Wang, R.- M. Lin, C.-H. Kuan, T. Li, Z. Wang, S. Zhu, and D. P. Tsai, A broadband achromatic metalens in the visible, Nat. Nanotech- nol. 13, 227 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    N. A. Rubin, G. D’Aversa, P. Chevalier, Z. Shi, W. T. Chen, and F. Capasso, Matrix Fourier optics enables a compact full- Stokes polarization camera, Science 365, eaax1839 (2019)

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    Miyata, N

    M. Miyata, N. Nemoto, K. Shikama, F. Kobayashi, and T. Hashimoto, Full-color-sorting metalenses for high- sensitivity image sensors, Optica 8, 1596 (2021)

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    Y. Fan, W. Huang, F. Zhu, X. Liu, C. Jin, C. Guo, Y. An, Y. Kivshar, C.-W. Qiu, and W. Li, Dispersion-assisted high- dimensional photodetector, Nature 630, 77 (2024)

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    X. Ni, A. V. Kildishev, and V. M. Shalaev, Metasurface holo- grams for visible light, Nat. Commun. 4, 2807 (2013)

    work page 2013

  12. [12]

    J. P. Balthasar Mueller, N. A. Rubin, R. C. Devlin, B. Groever, and F. Capasso, Metasurface polarization optics: independent 9 phase control of arbitrary orthogonal states of polarization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 113901 (2017)

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    Xiong, Y

    B. Xiong, Y. Liu, Y. Xu, L. Deng, C.-W. Chen, J.-N. Wang, R. Peng, Y. Lai, Y. Liu, and M. Wang, Breaking the limita- tion of polarization multiplexing in optical metasurfaces with engineered noise, Science 379, 294 (2023)

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    Gopakumar, G.-Y

    M. Gopakumar, G.-Y. Lee, S. Choi, B. Chao, Y. Peng, J. Kim, and G. Wetzstein, Full-colour 3D holographic augmented- reality displays with metasurface waveguides, Nature 629, 791 (2024)

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    J. Oh, K. Li, J. Yang, W. T. Chen, M.-J. Li, P. Dainese, and F. Capasso, Adjoint-optimized metasurfaces for compact mode-division multiplexing, ACS Photonics 9, 929 (2022)

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    G. Soma, Y. Nomoto, T. Umezawa, Y. Yoshida, Y. Nakano, and T. Tanemura, Compact and scalable polarimetric self- coherent receiver using a dielectric metasurface, Optica 10, 604 (2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Komatsu, G

    K. Komatsu, G. Soma, S. Ishimura, H. Takahashi, T. Tsuri- tani, M. Suzuki, Y. Nakano, and T. Tanemura, Scalable multi- core dual-polarization coherent receiver using a metasurface optical hybrid, J. Lightwave Technol. 42, 4013 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Q. Wang, E. T. F. Rogers, B. Gholipour, C.-M. Wang, G. Yuan, J. Teng, and N. I. Zheludev, Optically reconfigurable metasurfaces and photonic devices based on phase change ma- terials, Nat. Photonics 10, 60 (2016)

    work page 2016

  19. [19]

    S.-Q. Li, X. Xu, R. Maruthiyodan Veetil, V. Valuckas, R. Paniagua-Dom´ ınguez, and A. I. Kuznetsov, Phase-only transmissive spatial light modulator based on tunable dielec- tric metasurface, Science 364, 1087 (2019)

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    A. L. Holsteen, A. F. Cihan, and M. L. Brongersma, Temporal color mixing and dynamic beam shaping with silicon metasur- faces, Science 365, 257 (2019)

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    Zhang, C

    Y. Zhang, C. Fowler, J. Liang, B. Azhar, M. Y. Shalaginov, S. Deckoff-Jones, S. An, J. B. Chou, C. M. Roberts, V. Liber- man, M. Kang, C. R´ ıos, K. A. Richardson, C. Rivero-Baleine, T. Gu, H. Zhang, and J. Hu, Electrically reconfigurable non- volatile metasurface using low-loss optical phase-change mate- rial, Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 661 (2021)

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Y. Wang, P. Landreman, D. Schoen, K. Okabe, A. Marshall, U. Celano, H.-S. P. Wong, J. Park, and M. L. Brongersma, Electrical tuning of phase-change antennas and metasurfaces, Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 667 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    A. M. Shaltout, V. M. Shalaev, and M. L. Brongersma, Spa- tiotemporal light control with active metasurfaces, Science 364, eaat3100 (2019)

    work page 2019

  24. [24]

    T. Gu, H. J. Kim, C. Rivero-Baleine, and J. Hu, Reconfig- urable metasurfaces towards commercial success, Nat. Pho- tonics 17, 48 (2022)

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Y. Yao, R. Shankar, M. A. Kats, Y. Song, J. Kong, M. Lon- car, and F. Capasso, Electrically tunable metasurface perfect absorbers for ultrathin mid-infrared optical modulators, Nano Lett. 14, 6526 (2014)

    work page 2014

  26. [26]

    Huang, H

    Y.-W. Huang, H. W. H. Lee, R. Sokhoyan, R. A. Pala, K. Thyagarajan, S. Han, D. P. Tsai, and H. A. Atwater, Gate- tunable conducting oxide metasurfaces, Nano Lett. 16, 5319 (2016)

    work page 2016

  27. [27]

    Park, J.-H

    J. Park, J.-H. Kang, S. J. Kim, X. Liu, and M. L. Brongersma, Dynamic reflection phase and polarization control in metasur- faces, Nano Lett. 17, 407 (2017)

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    P. C. Wu, R. A. Pala, G. Kafaie Shirmanesh, W.-H. Cheng, R. Sokhoyan, M. Grajower, M. Z. Alam, D. Lee, and H. A. At- water, Dynamic beam steering with all-dielectric electro-optic III-V multiple-quantum-well metasurfaces, Nat. Commun. 10, 3654 (2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    G. K. Shirmanesh, R. Sokhoyan, P. C. Wu, and H. A. Atwater, Electro-optically tunable multifunctional metasurfaces, ACS Nano 14, 6912 (2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    J. Park, B. G. Jeong, S. I. Kim, D. Lee, J. Kim, C. Shin, C. B. Lee, T. Otsuka, J. Kyoung, S. Kim, K.-Y. Yang, Y.-Y. Park, J. Lee, I. Hwang, J. Jang, S. H. Song, M. L. Brongersma, K. Ha, S.-W. Hwang, H. Choo, and B. L. Choi, All-solid-state spatial light modulator with independent phase and amplitude control for three-dimensional LiDAR applications, Nat. ...

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    C. L. Panuski, I. Christen, M. Minkov, C. J. Brabec, S. Trajtenberg-Mills, A. D. Griffiths, J. J. D. McKendry, G. L. Leake, D. J. Coleman, C. Tran, J. St Louis, J. Mucci, C. Hor- vath, J. N. Westwood-Bachman, S. F. Preble, M. D. Dawson, M. J. Strain, M. L. Fanto, and D. R. Englund, A full degree-of- freedom spatiotemporal light modulator, Nat. Photonics 1...

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Sisler, P

    J. Sisler, P. Thureja, M. Y. Grajower, R. Sokhoyan, I. Huang, and H. A. Atwater, Electrically tunable space-time metasur- faces at optical frequencies, Nat. Nanotechnol.19, 1491 (2024)

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    F. Ren, M. Li, Q. Gao, W. Cowell, III, J. Luo, A. K.-Y. Jen, and A. X. Wang, Surface-normal plasmonic modulator using sub-wavelength metal grating on electro-optic polymer thin film, Opt. Commun. 352, 116 (2015)

    work page 2015

  34. [34]

    Zhang, Y

    J. Zhang, Y. Kosugi, A. Otomo, Y. Nakano, and T. Tane- mura, Active metasurface modulator with electro-optic poly- mer using bimodal plasmonic resonance, Opt. Express 25, 30304 (2017)

    work page 2017

  35. [35]

    Miyano, T

    H. Miyano, T. Fukui, G. Soma, A. Otomo, T. Tanemura, and Y. Nakano, Dimerized plasmonic-organic grating for high- speed metasurface modulator, in OptoElectronics and Com- munications Conference (OECC) and Photonics in Switching and Computing (PSC) 2022 , pp. TuD3–2

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    X. Sun, J. Sun, Z. Wang, L. Wang, F. Qiu, and L. Wen, Manip- ulating dual bound states in the continuum for efficient spatial light modulator, Nano Lett. 22, 9982 (2022)

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    Zhang, Y

    J. Zhang, Y. Kosugi, M. Ogasawara, K. Ariu, A. Otomo, T. Yamada, Y. Nakano, and T. Tanemura, High-speed meta- surface modulator using perfectly absorptive bimodal plas- monic resonance, APL Photonics 8, 121304 (2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    Zhang, X

    L. Zhang, X. Sun, H. Yu, N. Deng, F. Qiu, J. Wang, and M. Qiu, Plasmonic metafibers electro-optic modulators, Light Sci. Appl. 12, 198 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Benea-Chelmus, M

    I.-C. Benea-Chelmus, M. L. Meretska, D. L. Elder, M. Tam- agnone, L. R. Dalton, and F. Capasso, Electro-optic spatial light modulator from an engineered organic layer, Nat. Com- mun. 12, 5928 (2021)

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    X. Sun, H. Yu, N. Deng, D. Ban, G. Liu, and F. Qiu, Electro- optic polymer and silicon nitride hybrid spatial light modula- tors based on a metasurface, Opt. Express 29, 25543 (2021)

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    Sun and F

    X. Sun and F. Qiu, Polarization independent high-speed spa- tial modulators based on an electro-optic polymer and silicon hybrid metasurface, Photonics Res. 10, 2893 (2022)

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    Benea-Chelmus, S

    I.-C. Benea-Chelmus, S. Mason, M. L. Meretska, D. L. Elder, D. Kazakov, A. Shams-Ansari, L. R. Dalton, and F. Capasso, Gigahertz free-space electro-optic modulators based on Mie resonances, Nat. Commun. 13, 3170 (2022)

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    Ogasawara, Y

    M. Ogasawara, Y. Kosugi, J. Zhang, Y. Okamoto, Y. Mita, A. Otomo, Y. Nakano, and T. Tanemura, Electro-optic poly- mer surface-normal modulator using silicon high-contrast grat- ing resonator, in Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO) 2019 , p. JTh2A.48

    work page 2019

  44. [44]

    Zheng, Y

    T. Zheng, Y. Gu, H. Kwon, G. Roberts, and A. Faraon, Dy- namic light manipulation via silicon-organic slot metasurfaces, Nat. Commun. 15, 1557 (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    Kosugi, T

    Y. Kosugi, T. Yamada, A. Otomo, Y. Nakano, and T. Tane- mura, Surface-normal electro-optic-polymer modulator with silicon subwavelength grating, IEICE Electronics Express 13, 20160595 (2016)

    work page 2016

  46. [46]

    Fukui, K

    T. Fukui, K. Sumita, M. Takenaka, S. Takagi, Y. Nakano, and T. Tanemura, Numerical investigation of high-speed surface- normal modulator using InP high-contrast grating, in 28th In- ternational Semiconductor Laser Conference (ISLC) 2022 , p. TuP.40

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    Weiss, C

    A. Weiss, C. Frydendahl, J. Bar-David, R. Zektzer, E. Edrei, J. Engelberg, N. Mazurski, B. Desiatov, and U. Levy, Tun- 10 able metasurface using thin-film lithium niobate in the telecom regime, ACS Photonics 9, 605 (2022)

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    Damgaard-Carstensen, M

    C. Damgaard-Carstensen, M. Thomaschewski, and S. I. Bozhevolnyi, Electro-optic metasurface-based free-space mod- ulators, Nanoscale 14, 11407 (2022)

    work page 2022

  49. [49]

    Damgaard-Carstensen and S

    C. Damgaard-Carstensen and S. I. Bozhevolnyi, Nonlocal electro-optic metasurfaces for free-space light modulation, Nanophotonics 12, 2953 (2023)

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    Damgaard-Carstensen, T

    C. Damgaard-Carstensen, T. Yezekyan, M. L. Brongersma, and S. I. Bozhevolnyi, Higly efficient, tunable, electro-optic metasurfaces based on quasi-bound states in the continuum, arXiv:2412.01449 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    Weigand, V

    H. Weigand, V. V. Vogler-Neuling, M. R. Escal´ e, D. Pohl, F. U. Richter, A. Karvounis, F. Timpu, and R. Grange, Enhanced electro-optic modulation in resonant metasurfaces of lithium niobate, ACS Photonics 8, 3004 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Trajtenberg-Mills, M

    S. Trajtenberg-Mills, M. ElKabbash, C. J. Brabec, C. L. Panuski, I. Christen, and D. Englund, LNoS: Lithium niobate on silicon spatial light modulator, arXiv:2402.14608 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Di Francescantonio, A

    A. Di Francescantonio, A. Sabatti, H. Weigand, E. Bailly, M. A. Vincenti, L. Carletti, J. Kellner, A. Zilli, M. Finazzi, M. Celebrano, and R. Grange, Efficient GHz electro-optical modulation with a nonlocal lithium niobate metasurface in the linear and nonlinear regime, arXiv:2412.03422 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    Y. Ju, W. Zhang, Y. Zhao, X. Deng, and H. Zuo, Polarization independent lithium niobate electro-optic modulator based on guided mode resonance, Opt. Mater. 148, 114928 (2024)

    work page 2024

  55. [55]

    Karvounis, V

    A. Karvounis, V. V. Vogler-Neuling, F. U. Richter, E. D´ enervaud, M. Timofeeva, and R. Grange, Electro-optic metasurfaces based on barium titanate nanoparticle films, Adv. Opt. Mater. 8, 2000623 (2020)

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    J. Li, H. Tian, Y. Wu, and X. Wang, Double rectangular grooves metasurface for high efficient electric modulation, Opt. Express 32, 35594 (2024)

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    H. C. Weigand, ¨U.-L. Talts, A.-L. Vieli, V. V. Vogler-Neuling, A. Nardi, and R. Grange, Nanoimprinting solution-derived barium titanate for electro-optic metasurfaces, Nano Lett. 24, 5536 (2024)

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    W. Jin, P. V. Johnston, D. L. Elder, A. F. Tillack, B. C. Olbricht, J. Song, P. J. Reid, R. Xu, B. H. Robinson, and L. R. Dalton, Benzocyclobutene barrier layer for suppressing conductance in nonlinear optical devices during electric field poling, Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 243304 (2014)

    work page 2014

  59. [59]

    C. Koos, P. Vorreau, T. Vallaitis, P. Dumon, W. Bo- gaerts, R. Baets, B. Esembeson, I. Biaggio, T. Michinobu, F. Diederich, W. Freude, and J. Leuthold, All-optical high- speed signal processing with silicon–organic hybrid slot waveg- uides, Nat. Photonics 3, 216 (2009)

    work page 2009

  60. [60]

    Kieninger, Y

    C. Kieninger, Y. Kutuvantavida, D. L. Elder, S. Wolf, H. Zwickel, M. Blaicher, J. N. Kemal, M. Lauermann, S. Ran- del, W. Freude, L. R. Dalton, and C. Koos, Ultra-high electro- optic activity demonstrated in a silicon-organic hybrid modu- lator, Optica 5, 739 (2018)

    work page 2018

  61. [61]

    A. C. Overvig, S. Shrestha, and N. Yu, Dimerized high contrast gratings, Nanophotonics 7, 1157 (2018)

    work page 2018

  62. [62]

    C. W. Hsu, B. Zhen, A. Douglas Stone, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, Bound states in the continuum, Nature Re- views Materials 1, 16048 (2016)

    work page 2016

  63. [63]

    Koshelev, S

    K. Koshelev, S. Lepeshov, M. Liu, A. Bogdanov, and Y. Kivshar, Asymmetric metasurfaces with high-Q resonances governed by bound states in the continuum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 193903 (2018)

    work page 2018

  64. [64]

    Advanced Research Infrastructure for Materials and Nanotechnology in Japan

    J. D. Joannopoulos, S. G. Johnson, J. N. Winn, and R. D. Meade, Photonic crystals: Molding the flow of light - second edition (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2008). 11 METHODS Optical simulation In all simulations, we employed a three-dimensional finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method (Ansys: Lumerical FDTD). Here, we set the refractive i...

    work page 2008