REVIEW 1 cited by
A Tolerant Independent Set Tester
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We give nearly optimal bounds on the sample complexity of $(\widetilde{\Omega}(\epsilon),\epsilon)$-tolerant testing the $\rho$-independent set property in the dense graph setting. In particular, we give an algorithm that inspects a random subgraph on $\widetilde{O}(\rho^3/\epsilon^2)$ vertices and, for some constant $c,$ distinguishes between graphs that have an induced subgraph of size $\rho n$ with fewer than $\frac{\epsilon}{c \log^4(1/\epsilon)} n^2$ edges from graphs for which every induced subgraph of size $\rho n$ has at least $\epsilon n^2$ edges. Our sample complexity bound matches, up to logarithmic factors, the recent upper bound by Blais and Seth (2023) for the non-tolerant testing problem, which is known to be optimal for the non-tolerant testing problem based on a lower bound by Feige, Langberg and Schechtman (2004). Our main technique is a new graph container lemma for sparse subgraphs instead of independent sets. We also show that our new lemma can be used to generalize one of the classic applications of the container method, that of counting independent sets in regular graphs, to counting sparse subgraphs in regular graphs.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
TCS-BENCH: Benchmarking State-of-the-Art Generative AI Theoretical Computer Science Research Ability
The paper introduces TCS-Bench, a 300-task proof-generation benchmark from top TCS papers, and reports frontier LLM accuracies from 30% to 68% using an automated verifier.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.