Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

How to Define the Quality of Data? A Feature-Based Literature Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.01491 v1 pith:KEULI7FY submitted 2025-04-02 cs.DB

classification cs.DB
keywords dataqualitydefinitionsliteraturedigitalexistingallowsalmost
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The digital transformation of our society is a constant challenge, as data is generated in almost every digital interaction. To use data effectively, it must be of high quality. This raises the question: what exactly is data quality? A systematic literature review of the existing literature shows that data quality is a multifaceted concept, characterized by a number of quality dimensions. However, the definitions of data quality vary widely. We used feature-oriented domain analysis to specify a taxonomy of data quality definitions and to classify the existing definitions. This allows us to identify research gaps and future topics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Domain-Specific Data Quality Analysis Using Technology-Independent Query Templates

    cs.DB 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A model-driven Quality Pattern Model (QPM) lets domain experts instantiate technology-independent quality-analysis templates that compile to XQuery, SPARQL, or Cypher.

Pith tools