pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2504.06913 · v2 · submitted 2025-04-09 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.SY· math.DS

Recognition: unknown

Controlling a Social Network of Individuals with Coevolving Actions and Opinions

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 📡 eess.SY cs.SYmath.DS
keywords networkcommittedminorityproblemactionsconsensusindividualsopinions
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In this paper, we consider a population of individuals who have actions and opinions, which coevolve, mutually influencing one another on a complex network structure. In particular, we formulate a control problem for this social network, in which we assume that we can inject into the network a committed minority -- a set of stubborn nodes -- with the objective of steering the population, initially at a consensus, to a different consensus state. Our study focuses on two main objectives: i) determining the conditions under which the committed minority succeeds in its goal, and ii) identifying the optimal placement for such a committed minority. After deriving general monotone convergence result for the controlled dynamics, we leverage these results to build a computationally-efficient algorithm to solve the first problem and an effective heuristics for the second problem, which we prove to be NP-complete. For both algorithms, we establish theoretical guarantees. The proposed methodology is illustrated though academic examples, and demonstrated on a real-world case study.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Awareness in collective decision-making: Modeling and control in a game-theoretic framework

    eess.SY 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A tutorial review of game-theoretic and control-theoretic models showing how awareness of individual-societal tradeoffs can shape collective decision-making dynamics.