REVIEW 3 cited by
PRM-BAS: Enhancing Multimodal Reasoning through PRM-guided Beam Annealing Search
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent work increasingly focuses on improving the reasoning capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). Among existing methods, Process Reward Models (PRMs) stand out for offering dense, step-wise supervision to guide intermediate reasoning. However, how to effectively integrate PRMs into search strategies remains an open question. In this paper, we introduce PRM-BAS (PRM-Guided Beam Annealing Search), a lightweight approach for PRM-guided reasoning that dynamically adjusts beam size -- starting with a broader search space and gradually narrowing it as contextual information accumulates, thereby balancing performance and efficiency. We further propose a unified framework for data construction and PRM training. Specifically, we construct the PRM-BAS-300k dataset by selecting 300k questions from existing datasets and performing rollouts at each step to estimate the probability of reaching a correct final answer. The PRM is then trained using a combination of value loss for absolute action quality and rank loss for relative action quality. Extensive experiments on challenging multimodal reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that PRM-BAS significantly improves reasoning performance while maintaining low computational cost. Moreover, it generalizes well across different model scales and architectures, showcasing strong robustness and plug-and-play capability.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
GM-PRM: A Generative Multimodal Process Reward Model for Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning
A generative multimodal process reward model that produces step-level critiques and corrections improves average math accuracy for six multimodal LLMs by 2.9 to 5.9 points under a refinement-based Best-of-N strategy.
-
Test-Time Scaling for Small VLMs on Multilingual Visual MCQ
On EXAMS-V, token budget and parseability dominate chain count, PRM-guided search, and selectors for small VLMs; the policy model itself yields the largest gain.
-
A Survey of Deep Learning for Geometry Problem Solving
This survey organizes deep learning work on geometry problem solving into task, method, benchmark, and evaluation categories, and highlights open challenges.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.