Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 118 references

Narrowband Imaging of a z=3.24 Protocluster: Insights from [O III] Emitting Galaxies

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Narrowband imaging reveals 24 [O III] emitters at z=3.24 forming an overdensity destined to become a Virgo-like cluster, spatially offset from the field's quiescent galaxies.

desk verdict New narrowband catalog of 24 [O III] emitters is a solid contribution, but the overdensity and Virgo-mass claims rest on seven photo-z members and a background-dominated volume, so the paper needs revision before the headline results can be trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.12225 v1 pith:IMLUOBX7 submitted 2025-04-16 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO

Ke Shi , Jun Toshikawa , XianZhong Zheng , Zheng Cai , DongDong Shi This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.CO
keywords protocluster[OIII]emittersnarrowbandimaginggalaxyoverdensityhaloassemblybiashigh-redshiftgalaxiesevolutionD4UD01
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper presents narrowband imaging of the spectroscopically confirmed protocluster D4UD01 at z=3.24, identifying 24 [O III] emitting galaxies. It argues that these galaxies form a genuine overdensity, with a density contrast of 0.8±0.6, that will evolve into a Virgo-like cluster of about 8.5×$10^{14}$ solar masses by the present day. It also finds that the [O III] emitters, which are normal, medium-mass star-forming galaxies, are spatially offset from the protocluster's quiescent and photometric-redshift galaxies, interpreting this as evidence that different galaxy populations inhabit dark matter halos that formed at different epochs. The lack of environmental differences between protocluster and field [O III] emitters, combined with the previously known high quiescent fraction, suggests the structure has passed its peak star-formation phase.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing elements are: (1) the narrowband H2S1 filter (λ_c=2.122 μm, Δλ=0.032 μm) which isolates [O III]λ5007 at z=3.24±0.03 within a 54.4 Mpc line-of-sight window; (2) a narrowband-excess color selection in K_S−H2S1 (Equation 1) with EW>30 Å and Σ=3; (3) photometric redshifts from SED fitting with CIGALE, selecting 2.8<z_phot<3.6 (average scatter ~0.4) and validated with the i−J vs J−K_S diagram; (4) Voronoi tessellation to map surface density and define the overdensity δΣ; (5) the analytic descendant mass formula M_z=0=(1+δ_m)ρV_true with bias b=3.4; and (6) the angular cross-correlation function (Landy–Szalay estimator) quantifying spatial segregation. Together these convert a narrowband imaging dataset into a protocluster overdensity measurement, a descendant mass estimate, and a spatial-segregation signature.

What would settle it

A spectroscopic redshift campaign for the 24 [O III] candidates, or at least the seven inside the 10 Mpc circle, would settle membership: if spectroscopy shows that a substantial fraction (enough to bring δΣ below ~0.3) are at z≈2.24 or z≈1.3 rather than z≈3.24, the overdensity and descendant-mass claims would collapse. A simpler test: if the narrowband-excess sources fail the i−J versus J−K_S [O III] color cut when measured spectroscopically, contamination is present.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that narrowband-selected [O III] emitters at z=3.24 trace a large overdensity in the D4UD01 field, with a galaxy density contrast of δΣ=0.8±0.6 inside a 10 Mpc radius circle, corresponding to a descendant mass of M_z=0=(8.5±0.7)×$10^{14}$ M_sun via the analytic relation M_z=0=(1+δ_m)ρV_true. The emitters are star-forming galaxies of median stellar mass ~$10^{10}$ M_sun that follow the main sequence, with strong [O III] emission (median rest-frame EW ~342 Å). Their spatial distribution is skewed southeast relative to the overdensity traced by photometric-redshift galaxies and quiescent galaxies; the angular cross-correlation function shows a strong anti-correlation between [O III] emitters and quiescent galaxies at scales below ~1 arcminute. The paper interprets this segregation as halo assembly bias: the less massive [O III] emitters and the massive photo-z/quiescent galaxies likely reside in dark matter halos of different formation epochs. Physical properties of the emitters show no significant differences between protocluster and field environments, and the paper argues this, together with the high quiescent fraction, indicates D4UD01 is an evolved protocluster past its peak star-forming phase, possibly with rapid quenching.

Load-bearing premise

The whole conclusion rests on the seven galaxies inside the 10 Mpc circle being genuine protocluster members at z=3.24; membership is assigned by photometric redshifts with roughly ±0.4 scatter within a filter window that spans 54.4 Mpc along the line of sight, so H-alpha emitters at z=2.24 or [S III] emitters at z=1.3 could be interlopers inflating the density contrast.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • D4UD01 is a genuine protocluster that will virialize into a cluster of mass (8.5±0.7)×10^14 M_sun by z=0, comparable to Virgo.
  • The spatial offset between [O III] emitters and quiescent/photo-z galaxies implies that no single galaxy population fully traces the underlying large-scale structure; surveys relying on one tracer may miss parts of protoclusters.
  • The absence of environmental differences among [O III] emitters, combined with the high quiescent fraction, suggests the protocluster is in an evolved state past its peak star formation, with rapid quenching and few galaxies in intermediate 'green valley' phases.
  • Narrowband [O III] selection reaches lower stellar masses (~10^10 M_sun, down to ~10^9.5 M_sun) than the previously used photo-z selection, filling in the faint end of the protocluster's galaxy population.
  • Protoclusters at similar redshifts can be in markedly different evolutionary states, as shown by comparing quiescent fractions across different systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the segregation is real, a testable prediction follows: in a spectroscopic sample, the [O III] emitters' host halos should be younger and less massive than those of the quiescent galaxies, and the anti-correlation in the angular cross-correlation should persist at fixed redshift; measuring the velocity dispersion of each population would distinguish true halo assembly bias from photometric-reds
  • The descendant mass is a lower limit because the 54.4 Mpc line-of-sight window dilutes the overdensity; mapping the structure with a wider or deeper survey could reveal additional components that push the final mass toward a Coma-like cluster, and the paper's own checks with 8 and 12 Mpc radii hint at such sensitivity.
  • The rapid-quenching interpretation could be tested by searching for Ly-alpha or Balmer-break 'transition' galaxies in the protocluster: the model predicts a deficit of intermediate-sSFR galaxies, whereas a slow-quenching model would predict a detectable population.
  • Extending the same H2S1 narrowband selection to other CFHTLS deep fields would build a uniformly selected sample of z≈3.2 protoclusters, allowing a statistical study of how protocluster evolutionary state depends on descendant mass.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents CFHT/WIRCam H2S1 narrowband imaging of the D4UD01 protocluster field at z=3.24 and selects 24 [O III] emission-line galaxies from a color-excess sample. Using CIGALE SED fits, the authors derive stellar masses, SFRs, EWs, and dust properties, and compare protocluster and field subsamples. The central claims are that the seven [O III] emitters inside a 10 Mpc circle form a genuine overdensity with δ=0.8±0.6, that this structure will evolve into a Virgo-like cluster with M_z=0=(8.5±0.7)×10^14 M_sun from Eq. (7), and that the [O III] population is spatially offset from photo-z and quiescent galaxies, suggesting different halo formation epochs. The paper also finds no significant environmental differences between the protocluster and field [O III] emitters on the basis of K-S and permutation tests.

Significance. If the seven galaxies are genuine protocluster members, the paper provides a useful, uniformly selected sample of moderate-mass star-forming galaxies in a spectroscopically anchored z~3.24 structure, and the proposed spatial segregation between [O III] emitters and quiescent/photo-z populations would be an interesting addition to the protocluster literature. Strengths of the work include the deep narrowband imaging, the uniform selection from a single filter, the use of multiwavelength SED fitting, and the inclusion of a permutation test to support the null environmental comparisons. However, the headline overdensity is only ~1.3σ above zero, membership rests on photo-z with average scatter Δz~0.4 inside a 54.4 Mpc-deep narrowband slice, and the descendant mass is dominated by the mean cosmic density in the full slice volume rather than by the galaxy excess. These issues must be addressed before the central claims can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.2] The headline overdensity δΣ = 0.8 ± 0.6 is only ~1.3σ above zero, and the seven 'protocluster members' are assigned by photo-z with average scatter Δz_phot ~ 0.4 within a narrowband slice whose line-of-sight depth is 54.4 Mpc. The contamination discussion in Section 3.2 addresses Hβ only and does not quantify the Hα (z=2.24) or [S III] (z~1.3) interloper fraction in the final 24 sources. Because the sample lacks spectroscopic confirmation, one or two interlopers among the seven members would remove the overdensity. Please quantify the expected interloper fraction from the photo-z PDFs and evaluate the overdensity significance against an interloper-contaminated null hypothesis.
  2. [Section 4.2, Eq. (7)] The descendant mass is computed with V_obs ≈ 1.7×10^4 Mpc^3, the full 54.4 Mpc slice volume, so M_z=0 is dominated by the cosmic mean matter in a long cylinder rather than by the galaxy excess. The quoted uncertainty of ±0.7×10^14 M_sun does not propagate the large δ_g = 0.8 ± 0.6 uncertainty, and the 8/10/12 Mpc consistency check rescales this same background-dominated volume, so it does not validate membership. Please separate the excess term from the mean-density term in Eq. (7) and give a full error budget that includes δ_g, the bias, and the redshift-space distortion correction.
  3. [Section 5.2, Figure 9] The claimed 'strong anti-correlation' between [O III] emitters and quiescent galaxies is presented without a significance level. Bootstrap error bars are shown, but no null hypothesis test, confidence interval, or correlation amplitude is quoted. Please quantify the significance of the CCF signal, for example by comparing with random realizations or by giving the χ²/dof and associated p-value over the scales where the anti-correlation is claimed.
  4. [Section 3.2] The photo-z selection window 2.8 < z_phot < 3.6 is motivated by Δz_phot ~ 0.4, but it is nearly as wide as the separation between the Hα and [O III] redshift peaks, and the i−J versus J−K_S color check is applied only to sources with reliable colors and is not a quantitative membership test. Please report the full photo-z probability distributions for the seven galaxies inside the 10 Mpc circle and estimate the expected contamination from lower-redshift line emitters in this window.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.1] The text says the 10 Mpc circle is placed to include 'four adjacent spectroscopically confirmed LBGs,' while the introduction and Figure 4 indicate five spectroscopic sources; please reconcile this discrepancy.
  2. [Section 2.1] Please state explicitly that the 54.4 Mpc line-of-sight depth is in comoving units, since the paper otherwise uses comoving distances throughout.
  3. [Section 3.2] There are typographical errors, including 'prominant' in the description of Figure 2 and 'Servey' in Section 2.1; these should be corrected in a revised version.
  4. [Table 2] It would aid the reader to mark in the table which sources fall in the overdense Voronoi cells (f~ > 1) as well as which fall inside the 10 Mpc circle, since the overdensity definition uses the Voronoi density field.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the [O III] overdensity and descendant mass estimates rest on new narrowband counts plus external simulation and analytic relations, not on a fitted parameter or a self-citation chain.

full rationale

The central new result is the narrowband-selected [O III] sample (Secs. 3.1-3.2) and the surface-density contrast delta_Sigma = 0.8 +/- 0.6 measured inside a 10 Mpc aperture (Sec. 4.2); that quantity is a direct count ratio, not a fitted parameter. The descendant mass M_z=0 = (8.5 +/- 0.7) x 10^14 M_sun follows from Eq. (7), an analytic cosmic-mean-density integral with a bias b = 3.4 taken from the external Zhai et al. (2021) simulation analysis, so the output is not defined in terms of itself. The Chiang et al. (2013) probability and mass calibration are external simulation results cited as such. Toshikawa et al. (2016) is cited for the original spectroscopic discovery of D4UD01, which rests on independent spectroscopy of at least five galaxies, not on the present counts. Shi et al. (2021) supplies the comparison photo-z and quiescent samples and quiescent fraction; those are independent prior analyses, not outputs of the present derivation. The paper explicitly acknowledges its limitations: the H2S1 slice spans 54.4 Mpc line-of-sight (Sec. 2.1), the photo-z scatter is delta_z ~ 0.4 (Sec. 3.2), and the small sample 'may prevent detection of subtle environmental effects' (Sec. 6). The 10 Mpc aperture is admittedly placed to include the [O III] overdensity (Sec. 4.1), which is a post-hoc selection caveat rather than a circular reduction, since the density contrast is not defined in terms of the mass output or any fitted quantity. Overall, the derivation is self-contained against external benchmarks and no load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are invented. The analysis relies on standard SED templates, literature bias values, and chosen sample boundaries; the main free choices are the protocluster radius, photo-z window, AGN cut, and bias value.

free parameters (4)
  • Protocluster radius R = 10 Mpc (comoving)
    Chosen to enclose the four spectroscopically confirmed LBGs and most [O III] emitters in overdense regions; tests with 8 and 12 Mpc give masses of 6.6-9.1 x 10^14 M_sun.
  • Photo-z selection window = 2.8 < z_phot < 3.6
    Set by the average photo-z error delta z about 0.4; the broad window admits possible interlopers from H-alpha and [S III] emitters.
  • AGN fraction threshold = 0.7
    Sources with AGN fraction greater than 0.7 in SED fits were excluded, reducing the sample from 27 to 24; no X-ray or radio data are available for confirmation.
  • Bias b for [O III] emitters = 3.4
    Adopted from Zhai et al. (2021) for z about 3; this value directly scales the matter overdensity and the descendant mass in Equation (7).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The 24 [O III] emitters selected by narrowband excess and photo-z are genuine z=3.24 protocluster and field galaxies.
    Sample membership underpins all overdensity and environmental comparisons; photo-z scatter delta z about 0.4 and the H2S1 filter also admit H-alpha at z=2.24 and [S III] at z=1.3 (Sections 2.1 and 3.2).
  • domain assumption The observed galaxy overdensity can be converted to matter overdensity using a linear bias and a spherical-collapse correction.
    Used in Equation (7) to derive descendant mass; bias is taken from Zhai et al. (2021) and the correction from Steidel et al. (1998), not measured in this paper.
  • domain assumption The five spectroscopically confirmed LBGs from Toshikawa et al. (2016) establish that the field contains a genuine z=3.24 structure.
    Prior spectroscopic confirmation anchors the protocluster and determines the placement of the 10 Mpc circle in Section 4.1.
  • domain assumption Chiang et al. (2013) simulation relations between overdensity and descendant cluster mass apply to this field.
    Used to infer a Virgo-like descendant; extrapolating simulation calibrations to a single observed field carries model uncertainty.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Narrowband Imaging of a z=3.24 Protocluster: Insights from [O III] Emitting Galaxies." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IMLUOBX7

@misc{pith2026250412225,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Narrowband Imaging of a z=3.24 Protocluster: Insights from [O III] Emitting Galaxies},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IMLUOBX7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.12225}
}
abstract

We present a narrowband imaging on a spectroscopically confirmed protocluster ``D4UD01'' at z=3.24 using CFHT/WIRCam. We identify a sample of 24 [O III] emission line galaxies in the field, which forms a large overdensity in the protocluster region. The protocluster is expected to evolve into a Virgo-like cluster by z=0. Utilizing multiwavelength data, we derive the physical properties of these [O III] emitters and find they are medium mass normal star-forming galaxies ($\sim10^{10}$M$_\odot$) roughly following the star-forming main sequence. The [O III] emitters trace an overdensity spatially offset from that of photometric-redshift and quiescent galaxies, suggesting these distinct galaxy populations may inhabit dark matter halos that formed at different epochs. A comparative analysis of [O III] emitter properties shows similar characteristics in both protocluster and field environments. This protocluster likely represents an evolved structure that has progressed beyond its peak star-formation phase, although our limited sample size may prevent detection of subtle environmental effects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.12225 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Color-magnitude diagram for selecting emission line galaxies. Gray points denote all the sources detected in the narrow band image while red circles show the emission line candidates which satisfy our selection criteria. The green line represents the narrow band excess cut of EW = 30 ˚A. The blue dashed line corresponds to the selection criterion defined by Equation (1). The vertical dashed line denotes the 5σ limit… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Left: i − J vs. J − KS color-color diagram. The red circles are the photo-z selected [O iii] emitters while the blue circles are other emission line galaxies at lower redshifts. The solid lines represent the criteria selecting [O iii] emitters at z > 3 (Tadaki et al. 2013; Suzuki et al. 2015). Right: Rest-frame UV J color-color diagram of the selected [O iii] emitters. The solid lines are the cut used to define quie… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Voronoi tessellation of [O iii] emitters (left), photo-z galaxies (middle) and quiescent galaxies (right). The different colored points respresent galaxies with different local density contrast: ˜f > 2.0 (purple), 1.5 < ˜f < 2.0 (red), 1.0 < ˜f < 1.5 (orange) and ˜f < 1.0 (green). The cyan triangles are the five spectroscopically confirmed LBGs at z = 3.24. The large blue circles (10 Mpc in radius) denote the protoc… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: SFR-M⋆ relation for the [O iii] emitters in our sample. The star-forming main sequence (MS) at z = 3.24 derived from Speagle et al. (2014) is indicated as the green solid line with a 0.3 dex dispersion. The grey shaded area shows the KS band selected photo-z galaxies a…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Normalized distributions of the physical properties of [O iii] emitters in the protocluster (red hatched) and in the field (gray). The corresponding p-value obtained from K-S test is indicated in each panel. The red and black vertical lines represent the median values …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The quiescent fraction of different protoclus￾ters at different redshifts. A mass-cut of M⋆ > 1011M⊙ is adopted when selecting quiescent galaxies. From left to right, protoclusters are located at z = 2.16 (Naufal et al. 2024), z = 2.24 (Shi et al. 2024a), z = 3.24 (our…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Normalized distributions of stellar mass (left), star-formation rate (middle) and specific star-formation rate (right) of [O iii] emitters (blue), photo-z galaxies (gray) and photo-z selected quiescent galaxies (red). Galaxies with SFR= 0 are are indicated in the log(S…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: shows the CCFs between the [O iii] emitters and the photo-z galaxies as well as the photo-z quies￾cent galaxies. At angular scales below ∼ 1 ′ , we observe a strong anti-correlation between [O iii] emitters and qui￾escent galaxies. A mild anti-correlation is also seen …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

118 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2022, ApJS, 259, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac4414

    Abdurro’uf, Accetta, K., Aerts, C., et al. 2022, ApJS, 259, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac4414

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac4414 2022

  2. [2]

    M., Martini, P., Croxall, K

    Adams, S. M., Martini, P., Croxall, K. V., Overzier, R. A., & Silverman, J. D. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 1335, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv065

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv065 2015

  3. [3]

    2022, Universe, 8, 554, doi: 10.3390/universe8110554

    Alberts, S., & Noble, A. 2022, Universe, 8, 554, doi: 10.3390/universe8110554

    doi:10.3390/universe8110554 2022

  4. [4]

    2013, Science China

    An, F., Zheng, X., Meng, Y., et al. 2013, Science China

    2013

  5. [5]

    Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 56, 2226, doi: 10.1007/s11433-013-5331-y [O iii] emitters in D4 15

    work page doi:10.1007/s11433-013-5331-y

  6. [6]

    2020, MNRAS, 496, 3169, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1757

    Ando, M., Shimasaku, K., & Momose, R. 2020, MNRAS, 496, 3169, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1757

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1757 2020

  7. [7]

    2019, MNRAS, 488, L99, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slz106

    Angthopo, J., Ferreras, I., & Silk, J. 2019, MNRAS, 488, L99, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slz106

    doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slz106 2019

  8. [8]

    2018, PASP, 130, 124501, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aae796

    Annunziatella, M., Marchesini, D., Stefanon, M., et al. 2018, PASP, 130, 124501, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aae796

    doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aae796 2018

Show all 118 references
  1. [9]

    E., Trump, J

    Backhaus, B. E., Trump, J. R., Pirzkal, N., et al. 2024, ApJ, 962, 195, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1520

    2024 doi

  2. [10]

    1996, A&AS, 117, 393, doi: 10.1051/aas:1996164

    Bertin, E., & Arnouts, S. 1996, A&AS, 117, 393, doi: 10.1051/aas:1996164

    1996 doi

  3. [11]

    J., et al

    Bielby, R., Hudelot, P., McCracken, H. J., et al. 2012, A&A, 545, A23, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118547

    2012 doi

  4. [12]

    2019, A&A, 622, A103, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834156

    Boquien, M., Burgarella, D., Roehlly, Y., et al. 2019, A&A, 622, A103, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834156

    2019 doi

  5. [13]

    B., Whitaker, K

    Brammer, G. B., Whitaker, K. E., van Dokkum, P. G., et al. 2011, ApJ, 739, 24, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/739/1/24

    2011 doi

  6. [14]

    2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x

    Bruzual, G., & Charlot, S. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x

    2003

  7. [15]

    J., Warren, S

    Bunker, A. J., Warren, S. J., Hewett, P. C., & Clements, D. L. 1995, MNRAS, 273, 513, doi: 10.1093/mnras/273.2.513

    1995 doi

  8. [16]

    C., et al

    Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682, doi: 10.1086/308692

    2000 doi

  9. [17]

    2003, PASP, 115, 763, doi: 10.1086/376392

    Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763, doi: 10.1086/376392

    2003 doi

  10. [18]

    2013, ApJ, 779, 127, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/779/2/127

    Chiang, Y.-K., Overzier, R., & Gebhardt, K. 2013, ApJ, 779, 127, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/779/2/127

    2013 doi

  11. [19]

    A., Gebhardt, K., & Henriques, B

    Chiang, Y.-K., Overzier, R. A., Gebhardt, K., & Henriques, B. 2017, ApJL, 844, L23, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa7e7b

    2017 doi

  12. [20]

    Kurk, J. D. 2014, MNRAS, 440, 3262, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu522

    2014 doi

  13. [21]

    C., et al

    Cucciati, O., Zamorani, G., Lemaux, B. C., et al. 2014, A&A, 570, A16, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423811

    2014 doi

  14. [22]

    C., Zamorani, G., et al

    Cucciati, O., Lemaux, B. C., Zamorani, G., et al. 2018, A&A, 619, A49, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833655

    2018 doi

  15. [23]

    2007, ApJ, 670, 156, doi: 10.1086/521818

    Daddi, E., Dickinson, M., Morrison, G., et al. 2007, ApJ, 670, 156, doi: 10.1086/521818

    2007 doi

  16. [24]

    M., et al

    Daikuhara, K., Kodama, T., P´ erez-Mart´ ınez, J. M., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 531, 2335, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1243

    2024 doi

  17. [25]

    A., Helou, G., Magdis, G

    Dale, D. A., Helou, G., Magdis, G. E., et al. 2014, ApJ, 784, 83, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/784/1/83

    2014 doi

  18. [26]

    2016, ApJ, 823, 11, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/1/11

    Dey, A., Lee, K.-S., Reddy, N., et al. 2016, ApJ, 823, 11, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/1/11

    2016 doi

  19. [27]

    1980, ApJ, 236, 351, doi: 10.1086/157753

    Dressler, A. 1980, ApJ, 236, 351, doi: 10.1086/157753

    1980 doi

  20. [28]

    J., et al

    Dressler, A., Oemler, Augustus, J., Couch, W. J., et al. 1997, ApJ, 490, 577, doi: 10.1086/304890

    1997 doi

  21. [29]

    2007, A&A, 468, 33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077525

    Elbaz, D., Daddi, E., Le Borgne, D., et al. 2007, A&A, 468, 33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077525

    2007 doi

  22. [30]

    L., Capak, P., Hsieh, B

    Faisst, A. L., Capak, P., Hsieh, B. C., et al. 2016, ApJ, 821, 122, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/821/2/122

    2016 doi

  23. [31]

    L., Rhoads, J

    Finkelstein, S. L., Rhoads, J. E., Malhotra, S., & Grogin, N. 2009, ApJ, 691, 465, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/691/1/465

    2009 doi

  24. [32]

    H., Broussard, A., et al

    Forrest, B., Tran, K.-V. H., Broussard, A., et al. 2017, ApJL, 838, L12, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa653b

    2017 doi

  25. [33]

    Gao, L., Springel, V., & White, S. D. M. 2005, MNRAS, 363, L66, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2005.00084.x

    2005

  26. [34]

    2003, MNRAS, 346, 601, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2966.2003.07114.x

    Goto, T., Yamauchi, C., Fujita, Y., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 346, 601, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2966.2003.07114.x

    2003

  27. [35]

    Gwyn, S. D. J. 2012, AJ, 143, 38, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/143/2/38

    2012 doi

  28. [36]

    2019, ApJ, 883, 142, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2cd5

    Harikane, Y., Ouchi, M., Ono, Y., et al. 2019, ApJ, 883, 142, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2cd5

    2019 doi

  29. [37]

    A., De Breuck, C., Galametz, A., et al

    Hatch, N. A., De Breuck, C., Galametz, A., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 410, 1537, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17538.x

    2011

  30. [38]

    2012, ApJ, 757, 15, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/15

    Tanaka, I. 2012, ApJ, 757, 15, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/15

    2012 doi

  31. [39]

    2016, ApJL, 826, L28, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/826/2/L28

    Hayashi, M., Kodama, T., Tanaka, I., et al. 2016, ApJL, 826, L28, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/826/2/L28

    2016 doi

  32. [40]

    Henriques, B. M. B., White, S. D. M., Lemson, G., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 421, 2904, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20521.x

    2012

  33. [41]

    C., Cucciati, O., et al

    Hung, D., Lemaux, B. C., Cucciati, O., et al. 2025, ApJ, 980, 155, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada616

    2025 doi

  34. [42]

    N., Stanway, E

    Husband, K., Bremer, M. N., Stanway, E. R., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 432, 2869, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt642

    2013 doi

  35. [43]

    2020, ApJ, 899, 5, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aba269

    Ito, K., Kashikawa, N., Toshikawa, J., et al. 2020, ApJ, 899, 5, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aba269

    2020 doi

  36. [44]

    2021, ApJ, 916, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abfc50

    Ito, K., Kashikawa, N., Tanaka, M., et al. 2021, ApJ, 916, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abfc50

    2021 doi

  37. [45]

    2023, ApJL, 945, L9, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acb49b

    Ito, K., Tanaka, M., Valentino, F., et al. 2023, ApJL, 945, L9, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acb49b

    2023 doi

  38. [46]

    2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 962, doi: 10.1038/s41550-018-0587-9

    Jiang, L., Wu, J., Bian, F., et al. 2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 962, doi: 10.1038/s41550-018-0587-9

    2018 doi

  39. [47]

    B., Magdis, G

    Jin, S., Sillassen, N. B., Magdis, G. E., et al. 2024, A&A, 683, L4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348540

    2024 doi

  40. [48]

    2007, ApJ, 663, 765, doi: 10.1086/518410

    Kashikawa, N., Kitayama, T., Doi, M., et al. 2007, ApJ, 663, 765, doi: 10.1086/518410

    2007 doi

  41. [49]

    Kauffmann, G., White, S. D. M., Heckman, T. M., et al. 2004, MNRAS, 353, 713, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08117.x

    2004

  42. [50]

    A., Sobral, D., Mobasher, B., et al

    Khostovan, A. A., Sobral, D., Mobasher, B., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 3948, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1474

    2015 doi

  43. [51]

    2013, MNRAS, 434, 423, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1035

    Koyama, Y., Smail, I., Kurk, J., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 434, 423, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1035

    2013 doi

  44. [52]

    Koyama, Y., Polletta, M. d. C., Tanaka, I., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 503, L1, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slab013 16 Shi et al

    2021 doi

  45. [53]

    K., Yamada, T., et al

    Kubo, M., Uchimoto, Y. K., Yamada, T., et al. 2013, ApJ, 778, 170, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/778/2/170

    2013 doi

  46. [54]

    A., Venemans, B

    Kuiper, E., Hatch, N. A., Venemans, B. P., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 417, 1088, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19324.x

    2011

  47. [55]

    D., Pentericci, L., R¨ ottgering, H

    Kurk, J. D., Pentericci, L., R¨ ottgering, H. J. A., & Miley, G. K. 2004, A&A, 428, 793, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20040075 Labb´ e, I., Huang, J., Franx, M., et al. 2005, ApJL, 624, L81, doi: 10.1086/430700

    2004 doi

  48. [56]

    D., & Szalay, A

    Landy, S. D., & Szalay, A. S. 1993, ApJ, 412, 64, doi: 10.1086/172900

    1993 doi

  49. [57]

    2014, ApJ, 796, 126, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/796/2/126

    Lee, K.-S., Dey, A., Hong, S., et al. 2014, ApJ, 796, 126, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/796/2/126

    2014 doi

  50. [58]

    C., Cucciati, O., Tasca, L

    Lemaux, B. C., Cucciati, O., Tasca, L. A. M., et al. 2014, A&A, 572, A41, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423828

    2014 doi

  51. [59]

    C., Le F` evre, O., Cucciati, O., et al

    Lemaux, B. C., Le F` evre, O., Cucciati, O., et al. 2018, A&A, 615, A77, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730870

    2018 doi

  52. [60]

    C., Cucciati, O., Le F` evre, O., et al

    Lemaux, B. C., Cucciati, O., Le F` evre, O., et al. 2022, A&A, 662, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039346

    2022 doi

  53. [62]

    A., Venemans, B

    Maschietto, F., Hatch, N. A., Venemans, B. P., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 389, 1223, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13571.x

    2008

  54. [63]

    2022, ApJ, 926, 37, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2b9f

    McConachie, I., Wilson, G., Forrest, B., et al. 2022, ApJ, 926, 37, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2b9f

    2022 doi

  55. [64]

    A., Amodeo, S., et al

    Mei, S., Hatch, N. A., Amodeo, S., et al. 2023, A&A, 670, A58, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243551

    2023 doi

  56. [65]

    C., et al

    Merlin, E., Fontana, A., Ferguson, H. C., et al. 2015, A&A, 582, A15, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526471

    2015 doi

  57. [66]

    2016, A&A, 595, A97, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628751

    Merlin, E., Bourne, N., Castellano, M., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A97, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628751

    2016 doi

  58. [67]

    2013, ApJ, 777, 18, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/777/1/18

    Muzzin, A., Marchesini, D., Stefanon, M., et al. 2013, ApJ, 777, 18, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/777/1/18

    2013 doi

  59. [68]

    2024, ApJ, 977, 58, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8dcf

    Naufal, A., Koyama, Y., D’Eugenio, C., et al. 2024, ApJ, 977, 58, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8dcf

    2024 doi

  60. [69]

    G., Weiner, B

    Noeske, K. G., Weiner, B. J., Faber, S. M., et al. 2007, ApJL, 660, L43, doi: 10.1086/517926

    2007 doi

  61. [70]

    2009, A&A, 507, 1793, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912497

    Noll, S., Burgarella, D., Giovannoli, E., et al. 2009, A&A, 507, 1793, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912497

    2009 doi

  62. [71]

    B., & Gunn, J

    Oke, J. B., & Gunn, J. E. 1983, ApJ, 266, 713, doi: 10.1086/160817

    1983 doi

  63. [72]

    M., Lilly, S., et al

    Onodera, M., Carollo, C. M., Lilly, S., et al. 2016, ApJ, 822, 42, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/822/1/42

    2016 doi

  64. [73]

    L., et al

    Onodera, M., Shimakawa, R., Suzuki, T. L., et al. 2020, ApJ, 904, 180, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc174

    2020 doi

  65. [74]

    Overzier, R. A. 2016, A&A Rv, 24, 14, doi: 10.1007/s00159-016-0100-3

    2016 doi

  66. [75]

    D., R¨ ottgering, H

    Pentericci, L., Kurk, J. D., R¨ ottgering, H. J. A., et al. 2000, A&A, 361, L25. https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0008143 P´ erez-Mart´ ınez, J. M., Dannerbauer, H., Kodama, T., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 1707, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2784 P´ erez-Mart´ ınez, J. M., Kodama, T., Koy...

    2000 arXiv

  67. [76]

    2021, A&A, 654, A121, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140612

    Polletta, M., Soucail, G., Dole, H., et al. 2021, A&A, 654, A121, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140612

    2021 doi

  68. [77]

    Richardson, W. H. 1972, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 62, 55, doi: 10.1364/JOSA.62.000055

    1972 doi

  69. [78]

    2014, Serbian Astronomical Journal, 189, 1, doi: 10.2298/SAJ1489001S

    Salim, S. 2014, Serbian Astronomical Journal, 189, 1, doi: 10.2298/SAJ1489001S

    2014 doi

  70. [79]

    D., Wang, X., Zheng, X

    Shi, D. D., Wang, X., Zheng, X. Z., et al. 2024a, ApJ, 963, 21, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad17c3

    doi

  71. [80]

    2024b, ApJ, 961, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad11d7

    Shi, K., Malavasi, N., Toshikawa, J., & Zheng, X. 2024b, ApJ, 961, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad11d7

    doi

  72. [81]

    2020, ApJ, 899, 79, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aba626

    Shi, K., Toshikawa, J., Cai, Z., Lee, K.-S., & Fang, T. 2020, ApJ, 899, 79, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aba626

    2020 doi

  73. [82]

    2021, ApJ, 911, 46, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe62e

    Shi, K., Toshikawa, J., Lee, K.-S., et al. 2021, ApJ, 911, 46, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe62e

    2021 doi

  74. [83]

    2019a, ApJ, 871, 83, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf85d

    Shi, K., Lee, K.-S., Dey, A., et al. 2019a, ApJ, 871, 83, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf85d

    doi

  75. [84]

    2019b, ApJ, 879, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2118

    Shi, K., Huang, Y., Lee, K.-S., et al. 2019b, ApJ, 879, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2118

    doi

  76. [85]

    2018, MNRAS, 473, 1977, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2494

    Shimakawa, R., Kodama, T., Hayashi, M., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 1977, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2494

    2018 doi

  77. [86]

    F., Brodwin, M., Mancone, C

    Snyder, G. F., Brodwin, M., Mancone, C. M., et al. 2012, ApJ, 756, 114, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/756/2/114

    2012 doi

  78. [87]

    Silverman, J. D. 2014, ApJS, 214, 15, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/15

    2014 doi

  79. [88]

    Springel, V., White, S. D. M., Jenkins, A., et al. 2005, Nature, 435, 629, doi: 10.1038/nature03597

    2005 doi

  80. [89]

    C., Forrest, B., et al

    Staab, P., Lemaux, B. C., Forrest, B., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 6934, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae301

    2024 doi

  81. [90]

    A., Eisenhardt, P

    Stanford, S. A., Eisenhardt, P. R., & Dickinson, M. 1998, ApJ, 492, 461, doi: 10.1086/305050

    1998 doi

  82. [91]

    C., Adelberger, K

    Steidel, C. C., Adelberger, K. L., Dickinson, M., et al. 1998, ApJ, 492, 428, doi: 10.1086/305073

    1998 doi

  83. [92]

    C., Adelberger, K

    Steidel, C. C., Adelberger, K. L., Shapley, A. E., et al. 2005, ApJ, 626, 44, doi: 10.1086/429989

    2005 doi

  84. [93]

    L., Kodama, T., Tadaki, K.-i., et al

    Suzuki, T. L., Kodama, T., Tadaki, K.-i., et al. 2015, ApJ, 806, 208, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/208

    2015 doi

  85. [94]

    L., Kodama, T., Sobral, D., et al

    Suzuki, T. L., Kodama, T., Sobral, D., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 462, 181, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1655 [O iii] emitters in D4 17

    2016 doi

  86. [95]

    2024, ApJ, 966, 18, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad32c5

    Taamoli, S., Mobasher, B., Chartab, N., et al. 2024, ApJ, 966, 18, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad32c5

    2024 doi

  87. [96]

    2013, ApJ, 778, 114, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/778/2/114

    Tadaki, K.-i., Kodama, T., Tanaka, I., et al. 2013, ApJ, 778, 114, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/778/2/114

    2013 doi

  88. [97]

    2009, Nature, 459, 61, doi: 10.1038/nature07947

    Tamura, Y., Kohno, K., Nakanishi, K., et al. 2009, Nature, 459, 61, doi: 10.1038/nature07947

    2009 doi

  89. [98]

    2024, ApJ, 970, 59, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5316

    Tanaka, M., Onodera, M., Shimakawa, R., et al. 2024, ApJ, 970, 59, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5316

    2024 doi

  90. [99]

    P., Chevallard, J., et al

    Tang, M., Stark, D. P., Chevallard, J., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 503, 4105, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab705

    2021 doi

  91. [100]

    2005, ApJ, 621, 673, doi: 10.1086/426932

    Oliveira, C. 2005, ApJ, 621, 673, doi: 10.1086/426932

    2005 doi

  92. [101]

    A., Kashikawa, N., et al

    Toshikawa, J., Malkan, M. A., Kashikawa, N., et al. 2020, ApJ, 888, 89, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5e85

    2020 doi

  93. [102]

    2012, ApJ, 750, 137, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/750/2/137

    Toshikawa, J., Kashikawa, N., Ota, K., et al. 2012, ApJ, 750, 137, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/750/2/137

    2012 doi

  94. [103]

    2016, ApJ, 826, 114, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/114

    Toshikawa, J., Kashikawa, N., Overzier, R., et al. 2016, ApJ, 826, 114, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/114

    2016 doi

  95. [104]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.15910, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.15910

    Toshikawa, J., Wuyts, S., Kashikawa, N., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.15910, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.15910

    2024 doi arXiv

  96. [105]

    H., Forrest, B., Alcorn, L

    Tran, K.-V. H., Forrest, B., Alcorn, L. Y., et al. 2020, ApJ, 898, 45, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8cba

    2020 doi

  97. [106]

    2018, PASJ, 70, S32, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx112

    Uchiyama, H., Toshikawa, J., Kashikawa, N., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, S32, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx112

    2018 doi

  98. [107]

    P., R¨ ottgering, H

    Venemans, B. P., R¨ ottgering, H. J. A., Miley, G. K., et al. 2007, A&A, 461, 823, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053941

    2007 doi

  99. [108]

    2016, ApJ, 828, 56, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/828/1/56

    Wang, T., Elbaz, D., Daddi, E., et al. 2016, ApJ, 828, 56, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/828/1/56

    2016 doi

  100. [109]

    2010, ApJS, 187, 251, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/187/1/251

    Ting, H.-C. 2010, ApJS, 187, 251, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/187/1/251

    2010 doi

  101. [110]

    R., Davidzon, I., Toft, S., et al

    Weaver, J. R., Davidzon, I., Toft, S., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A184, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245581

    2023 doi

  102. [111]

    H., Zentner, A

    Wechsler, R. H., Zentner, A. R., Bullock, J. S., Kravtsov, A. V., & Allgood, B. 2006, ApJ, 652, 71, doi: 10.1086/507120

    2006 doi

  103. [112]

    Z., et al

    Wen, R., An, F., Zheng, X. Z., et al. 2022, ApJ, 933, 50, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7392

    2022 doi

  104. [113]

    J., Quadri, R

    Williams, R. J., Quadri, R. F., Franx, M., van Dokkum, P., & Labb´ e, I. 2009, ApJ, 691, 1879, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/691/2/1879

    2009 doi

  105. [114]

    2013, ApJ, 769, 79, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/769/1/79

    Wylezalek, D., Galametz, A., Stern, D., et al. 2013, ApJ, 769, 79, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/769/1/79

    2013 doi

  106. [115]

    2022, ApJ, 930, 102, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6257

    Yonekura, N., Kajisawa, M., Hamaguchi, E., Mawatari, K., & Yamada, T. 2022, ApJ, 930, 102, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6257

    2022 doi

  107. [116]

    A., Casey, C

    Zavala, J. A., Casey, C. M., Scoville, N., et al. 2019, ApJ, 887, 183, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5302

    2019 doi

  108. [117]

    R., Hearin, A

    Zentner, A. R., Hearin, A. P., & van den Bosch, F. C. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 3044, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1383

    2014 doi

  109. [118]

    2021, MNRAS, 505, 2784, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1539

    Zhai, Z., Wang, Y., Benson, A., Chuang, C.-H., & Yepes, G. 2021, MNRAS, 505, 2784, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1539

    2021 doi

  110. [119]

    Z., Shi, D

    Zhang, Y., Zheng, X. Z., Shi, D. D., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 4893, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac824

    2022 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.