Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 119 references

AnywhereXR: On-the-fly 3D Environments as a Basis for Open Source Immersive Digital Twin Applications

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read AnywhereXR claims that open geospatial data alone can feed a procedural pipeline that builds object-based, street-level immersive digital twins, demonstrated for the Netherlands.

desk verdict A solid open-source pipeline paper whose own survey undercuts the street-level fidelity claim; the engineering contribution and reproducible artifacts carry it through peer review. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.14065 v1 pith:SUMDHAK6 submitted 2025-04-18 cs.HC

Alexander Klippel , Bart Knuiman , Jiayan Zhao , Jan Oliver Wallgrün , Jascha Grübel This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.HC
keywords immersivedigitaltwinproceduralgenerationopengeospatialdataextendedrealityparticipatoryco-designvisceralization3Denvironment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

AnywhereXR is a procedural pipeline that turns publicly available geospatial data into object-based, street-level 3D environments inside a game engine, without manual modeling. The paper claims that for data-rich countries such as the Netherlands, open data alone can support high-fidelity immersive digital twins: environments where each tree, building, road, and water body is a separate object that can be selected, modified, or animated. If this holds, participatory planning, co-design, and visceral data experiences could run on open infrastructure rather than on proprietary globe services. The authors support the claim with a five-stage implementation, an expert survey of visual fidelity, and a case study that injects live public-transport positions into the generated scene. The broader ambition is that the workflow generalizes beyond the Netherlands, though the authors acknowledge that most countries do not yet publish the required object-level data.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the five-stage AnywhereXR pipeline, running inside the Unity game engine: land cover and use polygons from PDOK vector tiles are triangulated with the Earcut algorithm, AHN elevation data is cleaned with a circular post-filter, water polygons are intersected with terrain boundaries to fix elevation mismatches, 3D BAG buildings are imported from b3dm tiles and textured with aerial imagery, and tree positions are extracted from Bomenregister image tiles by flood-filling crown regions. The pipeline's signature technique is dynamic terrain detail: soil information is baked into a constant-size texture and the mesh resolution is sampled from that texture based on the viewer's position, so close-up fidelity stays high without a fixed high-polygon mesh. These stages work because every object remains a separate Unity entity, which is what allows later stages, simulations, or user edits to touch individual trees, buildings, or roads.

What would settle it

Run the same AnywhereXR pipeline on a region outside the Netherlands that lacks an open 3D building registry and tree registry but has only 2D vector tiles and coarse elevation. If the resulting environment cannot reach the fidelity levels reported for Dutch scenes, roughly 3 to 4 on a 7-point scale, or requires manual post-processing to fix water and buildings, then the claim that open data is sufficient for on-the-fly immersive digital twins is falsified for that data regime.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a lightweight, modular procedural generator can create object-based, high-fidelity immersive environments from open geospatial data. AnywhereXR queries public Dutch databases — PDOK for land cover, AHN for elevation, 3D BAG for building geometry, and the partially open Bomenregister for trees — and extrudes them into a Unity scene in five stages: land cover and use, elevation, water, buildings, and trees. Unlike 3D tile services built from aerial reconstructions, each environmental entity is an individual mesh, which makes the model adaptable to alternative future states and real-time data. The paper does not claim photographic parity: an online survey of 29 complete responses rated visual fidelity between 3.1 and 3.8 on a 7-point scale across trees, buildings, terrain, and roads, and street-level scenes scored lower than aerial views. The claim is that this fidelity is already sufficient for applications such as spatial planning and stakeholder engagement, and that the modular design is the path to "anywhere" coverage.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that governments will keep publishing high-quality, open, object-level geospatial data outside the Netherlands; if that data does not appear, the "anywhere" part of the approach cannot be realized.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The same five-stage pipeline can be pointed at another country's open datasets once they exist, making "anywhere" a data-availability problem rather than a modeling problem.
  • Object-based environments support scenario editing, such as changing tree density, road networks, or building states to simulate future or alternative designs.
  • Live data feeds, like the NDOV public-transport case, can be merged into the scene to turn a static 3D model into a digital twin that reflects current conditions.
  • Because terrain complexity is sampled dynamically from a texture, the approach keeps rendering cost low while preserving street-level detail.
  • The survey's marginal-effect results imply that completeness, such as a single missing characteristic tree, matters more to perceived fidelity than many other visual defects.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the "anywhere" ambition is taken literally, the paper's own data-availability caveat means the approach will first succeed where governments publish open object-level cadastral, elevation, and tree data; elsewhere it will need generative AI or citizen-science data to fill gaps.
  • The finding that one missing tree hurts ratings more than many missing trees suggests that perceptual fidelity is driven by salient anchor objects rather than aggregate completeness; a follow-up experiment could test whether placing characteristic objects in known locations improves presence more than adding generic detail.
  • Extending the NDOV case, the same socket-based API pattern could ingest other real-time feeds, such as weather, energy use, or pedestrian counts, to make the twin a live decision-making surface rather than a static scene.
  • The object-based representation makes AnywhereXR a natural testbed for comparing the usability of low- versus high-fidelity environments in participatory planning, complementing prior co-design work.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces AnywhereXR, a Unity-based procedural generator that assembles object-based 3D environments from open Dutch geospatial data sources (PDOK, AHN, 3D BAG, and the Bomenregister). Five generation stages are described: land cover/use, elevation, water, buildings, and trees. The authors report a survey evaluation (29 complete responses) in which participants rated visual fidelity of AnywhereXR screenshots against Google Earth images or photographs for 10 Dutch locations, alongside mixed-model and conjoint analyses. A case study demonstrates integration of live Dutch public transport data via an OV-API. The paper claims that AnywhereXR provides lightweight, high-fidelity, street-level-capable environments that can serve as a basis for open immersive digital twin applications.

Significance. If the central claims hold, AnywhereXR would be a notable open-source contribution to the digital twin community: it demonstrates that publicly available, object-level geospatial data can be assembled into interactive 3D environments without proprietary meshes, enabling applications such as participatory planning, co-design, and real-time data integration. The paper ships source code and evaluation data (Zenodo/GitLab), which supports reproducibility, and the modular architecture could be reused for other regions. The main significance is the proof of concept and the articulation of a workflow, rather than the specific user-study results. However, the paper's own evaluation provides only modest support for the 'high fidelity' and 'street-level advantage' claims, and several reporting inconsistencies in the statistical tables need to be resolved.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract, Section 4.2.5, Section 6, Table 1] The central claims of 'high-fidelity' environments and superior street-level quality are not supported by the reported evaluation. The aggregated fidelity scores are only 3.1 (trees) to 3.8 (terrain) out of 7, and the conjoint models find a significant negative effect of street-level perspective (Model 3: -0.31, p < .05; Model 4: -0.13, 95% CI [-0.24, -0.03]). Yet the abstract, highlights, Section 2.4, and Discussion (Section 6) motivate AnywhereXR specifically by its ground-level advantage over mesh-based platforms. The manuscript should either substantially temper these claims or provide additional task-based or comparative evidence that directly addresses street-level fidelity.
  2. [Table A.2 and Section 4.2.5] The interaction terms in Table A.2 are reported inconsistently. For example, 'Terrain x Ede Grotestraat Downtown' appears twice with different coefficients and signs (0.84 (0.37) and -1.68 (0.43); similarly for 'Terrain x Neijmegen Lent' and 'Terrain x Wageningen Skyline Rijn'). The second block appears to be intended as Trees x location interactions based on the text's interpretation that 'mostly the trees negatively impact ratings', but the table labels them as Terrain interactions. This makes the statistical results as printed impossible to interpret and the interaction effects must be re-reported correctly.
  3. [Section 3, Section 5.2, and title] The term 'lightweight' is a load-bearing descriptor in the title and Highlights, but the paper provides no quantitative performance evidence. No measurements are given for generation time, memory use, polygon counts, or frame rates in the generated environments; the only number is a reference to '60 frames per second' in the transport case study. For a systems paper, some basic performance characterization is needed to substantiate the lightweight claim.
  4. [Table A.3 and Section 4.2.4] The objective image-difference measures (number of missing trees, missing objects, noticeable buildings, roads, terrain; perspective) appear to be coded by the authors without a documented protocol, and the coding includes fractional values (e.g., location 'rcb' has #missing trees = 1.10). Please describe how these values were derived, who performed the coding, whether any inter-rater reliability was assessed, and how non-integer counts arise. This matters because the conjoint models (Model 3 and 4) directly rely on these measures.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 4.2.2 and Table A.2] The text reports 29 participants who filled out the questionnaire completely, but Table A.2 lists 'Num. groups: ResponseId 28' for all models. Please clarify whether one participant was excluded (e.g., due to missing covariates) or whether the table is incorrect.
  2. [Throughout] There are several typos and spelling inconsistencies: 'reposiories' in Section 3, 'adaption' in the Highlights, 'forumla' in Section 4.2.4, and 'Schevingen' used repeatedly instead of 'Scheveningen' (e.g., Table A.2, Section 4.2.5, and Figure captions).
  3. [Section 4.2.5] The sentence describing the best and worst locations reads ambiguously: 'the lowest scores from a very iconic location in Rotterdam, the Cube Houses, shown at street-level (see image pair second from top in Figure 17; 4.2 versus 2.4)'. Please clarify which number corresponds to which location and whether '4.2 versus 2.4' refers to overall ratings or a category.
  4. [Section 3.2.2] The precision of AHN 3 is described as 'approximately 0.5 square meters'; this should be stated as a resolution (e.g., 0.5 m cell size) rather than an area, or the area unit should be clarified.
  5. [Data availability statement] The same Zenodo DOI is given for both the source code and the evaluation data, but the text says the code is at a GitLab URL while data are at Zenodo; please confirm whether both are at the same Zenodo record or provide a separate DOI for the data.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: AnywhereXR is a system demonstration whose central claims are evaluated against external benchmarks, not derived from its own assumptions.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that AnywhereXR can create object-based 3D environments from open geospatial data. This is a system-building claim supported by an implementation, a public data pipeline, and an independent survey in which participants compared AnywhereXR screenshots with Google Earth imagery or photos of physical sites. No parameter is fitted to a target result and then renamed as a prediction; the regression models in Appendix A (Table A.2) analyze ratings using objective image-difference codings (missing trees, missing objects, noticeable buildings, perspective), and the results are reported with limitations (e.g., mean fidelity 3.1-3.8 out of 7 and a significant street-level deficit). The paper repeatedly self-cites prior work by the same group (e.g., refs [10], [12], [23], [36], [56], [85]), but these citations appear in background sections and are not load-bearing: the feasibility of the pipeline is demonstrated by the artifact and evaluated against external benchmarks, not by the cited papers. The acknowledged data-availability limitation ('open source data for each stage must be available, which in many countries is still lacking') is a scope condition, not a circular step. Therefore the derivation chain is self-contained with respect to circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the quality and openness of Dutch spatial datasets, the validity of screenshot-based visual assessment, and the assumption that Unity can render the scenes efficiently. These are domain assumptions rather than free parameters fitted to produce a predetermined result, though a few implementation parameters (grid resolution etc.) are hand-chosen.

free parameters (3)
  • Texture grid resolution (N x N)
    Chosen by the developers to balance rendering performance and texturing accuracy; exact value not given in the paper.
  • Water cell size for merging
    Trade-off between smooth shoreline and polygon count; value not specified.
  • Elevation gap-fill search radius
    Circular search radius used to interpolate missing AHN points; size not reported.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Dutch public data sources (PDOK, AHN, 3DBAG, Bomenregister) are accurate enough to support visual fidelity claims.
    The pipeline treats these datasets as ground truth; Section 3.1 describes them as authoritative.
  • domain assumption Static image comparisons (AnywhereXR screenshots vs. Google Earth/photos) are a valid proxy for the quality of immersive XR experiences.
    Section 4.2 uses image pairs rather than in-headset evaluation; the authors note this limitation in the discussion.
  • domain assumption The Unity game engine can render the generated meshes at interactive frame rates on target hardware.
    Performance is assumed adequate; no frame-rate or hardware benchmarks are reported.
  • standard math Standard algorithms (Earcut triangulation, ray casting, flood-fill) work as documented on the input data.
    Section 3.2 relies on these algorithms without proof; they are widely used.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of AnywhereXR: On-the-fly 3D Environments as a Basis for Open Source Immersive Digital Twin Applications." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SUMDHAK6

@misc{pith2026250414065,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: AnywhereXR: On-the-fly 3D Environments as a Basis for Open Source Immersive Digital Twin Applications},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SUMDHAK6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.14065}
}
read the original abstract

Visualization has long been fundamental to human communication and decision-making. Today, we stand at the threshold of integrating veridical, high-fidelity visualizations into immersive digital environments, alongside digital twinning techniques. This convergence heralds powerful tools for communication, co-design, and participatory decision-making. Our paper delves into the development of lightweight open-source immersive digital twin visualisations, capitalizing on the evolution of immersive technologies, the wealth of spatial data available, and advancements in digital twinning. Coined AnywhereXR, this approach ultimately seeks to democratize access to spatial information at a global scale. Utilizing the Netherlands as our starting point, we envision expanding this methodology worldwide, leveraging open data and software to address pressing societal challenges across diverse domains.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.14065 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Facades and trees from a 3D tile in Google Maps. (Source: [25]). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of workflow for AnywhereXR. Data is loaded from open research [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Detailed Workflow for AnywhereXR. AnywhereXR provides a foundation for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (20 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The workflow for the generation of the environment surface and texture. To [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left: Raster image representing different land cover/use classes after sampling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: AnywhereXR processes the DTM, fixes missing elevations, and adjusts the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Landscape created for Sint-Pietersberg south of Maastricht, illustrating the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Left: Raw, unfiltered terrain generated from AHN 3 data with frequent gaps [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Tile and elevation data are matched to obtain optimal boundaries. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Water generation. Left: Gap (yellow) between terrain and water edge (red), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Left: Biesbosch area automatically generated water representation. Right: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: AnywhereXR instantiates buildings from 3D BAG and preprocesses the tex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Left: Texture mapping for building facades. Right: Group of houses for an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Den Bosch with pseudo-random roof colors (left) and roof colors derived from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: AnywhereXR uses the Bomenregister to instantiate trees in the virtual en [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Left: Generated landscape representation for Grebbeberg, Rhenen, The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Depicted are examples of the comparisons of AnywhereXR (left) and bench [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Depicted are results from the survey. At the top, aggregated scores for all 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: The marginal effect plots of the model per factorial (a). We also look at the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_19.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Marginal change plots of our conjoint model. We plot the sensitivity of our [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_20.png]
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Workflow for public transport in AnywhereXR. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_21.png]
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: (a) Visualization of the bus transportation network data provided by OV [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_22.png]
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Initial version of an IDT that incorporates day/night time changes (top) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_23.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

119 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Sagiroglu, D

    S. Sagiroglu, D. Sinanc, Big data: A review, in: 2013 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS), 2013, pp. 42–47. doi:10.1109/CTS.2013.6567202

    arXiv 2013

  2. [2]

    J.-G. Lee, M. Kang, Geospatial big data: Challenges and opportunities, Big Data Research 2 (2) (2015) 74–81. doi:10.1016/j.bdr.2015.01. 003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.bdr.2015.01 2015

  3. [3]

    X. Liu, M. Chen, C. Claramunt, M. Batty, M.-P. Kwan, A. M. Senousi, T. Cheng, J. Strobl, C. Arzu, J. Wilson, T. Bandrova, M. Konecny, P. M. Torrens, F. Zhang, L. He, J. Wang, C. Ratti, O. Kolditz, A. Klip- pel, S. Li, H. Lin, G. L¨ u, Geographic information science in the era of geospatial big data: A cyberspace perspective, Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.))...

    arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    Hazeleger, J

    W. Hazeleger, J. P. M. Aerts, P. Bauer, M. F. P. Bierkens, G. Camps- Valls, M. M. Dekker, F. J. Doblas-Reyes, V. Eyring, C. Finkenauer, A. Grundner, S. Hachinger, D. M. Hall, T. Hartmann, F. Iglesias- Suarez, M. Janssens, E. R. Jones, T. K¨ olling, M. Lees, S. Lher- mitte, R. V. van Nieuwpoort, A.-K. Pahker, O. J. Pellicer-Valero, F. P. Pijpers, A. Siibak...

    2024

  5. [5]

    Loorbach, N

    D. Loorbach, N. Frantzeskaki, F. Avelino, Sustainability transitions research: Transforming science and practice for societal change, Annual Review of Environment and Resources 42 (1) (2017) 599–626. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340 2017

  6. [6]

    Balogun, D

    A.-L. Balogun, D. Marks, R. Sharma, H. Shekhar, C. Balmes, D. Ma- heng, A. Arshad, P. Salehi, Assessing the potentials of digitalization as a tool for climate change adaptation and sustainable development in urban centres, Sustainable Cities and Society 53 (2020) 101888. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101888

    work page arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    Werthner, The vienna manifesto on digital humanism, in: M

    H. Werthner, The vienna manifesto on digital humanism, in: M. Hengstschl¨ ager (Ed.), Digital transformation and ethics, Ecowin by Benevento Publishing, Salzburg, 2020, pp. 338–357. 42

    2020

  8. [8]

    L. D. Cosio, O. O. Buruk, D. Fern´ andez Galeote, I. D. V. Bosman, J. Hamari, Virtual and augmented reality for environmental sustain- ability: A systematic review, in: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Confer- ence on Human Factors in Computing Systems, no. 6 in CHI ’23, As- sociation for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2023, p. 23. doi:10.1145/3544548.3581147

    arXiv 2023

Show all 119 references
  1. [9]

    Chandler, M

    T. Chandler, M. Cordeil, T. Czauderna, T. Dwyer, J. Glowacki, C. Goncu, M. Klapperstueck, K. Klein, K. Marriott, F. Schreiber, E. Wilson, Immersive analytics, in: 2015 Big Data Visual Analytics (BDVA), 2015, pp. 1–8. doi:10.1109/BDVA.2015.7314296

    2015

  2. [10]

    Gr¨ ubel, T

    J. Gr¨ ubel, T. Thrash, L. Aguilar, M. Gath-Morad, J. Chatain, R. W. Sumner, C. H¨ olscher, V. R. Schinazi, The hitchhiker’s guide to fused twins: A review of access to digital twins in situ in smart cities, Remote Sensing 14 (13) (2022) 3095. doi:10.3390/rs14133095

    2022 doi

  3. [11]

    Jamei, M

    E. Jamei, M. Mortimer, M. Seyedmahmoudian, B. Horan, A. Sto- jcevski, Investigating the role of virtual reality in planning for sus- tainable smart cities, Sustainability 9 (11) (2017) 2006. doi:10.3390/ su9112006

    2017

  4. [12]

    Klippel, P

    A. Klippel, P. Sajjadi, J. Zhao, J. O. Wallgr¨ un, J. Huang, M. M. Bagher, Embodied digital twins for environmental applications, IS- PRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spa- tial Information Sciences V-4-2021 (2021) 193–200. doi:10.5194/ isprs-annals-V-4-2021...

    2021

  5. [13]

    Scaife, Y

    M. Scaife, Y. Rogers, External cognition: how do graphical representa- tions work?, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 45 (2) (1996) 185–213. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1996.0048

    1996

  6. [14]

    D. A. Norman, Things that make us smart, Addison-Wesley, New York, 1993

    1993

  7. [15]

    Cheng, C.-C

    K.-H. Cheng, C.-C. Tsai, Affordances of augmented reality in sci- ence learning: Suggestions for future research, Journal of Science Education and Technology 22 (4) (2013) 449–462. doi:10.1007/ s10956-012-9405-9. 43

    2013

  8. [16]

    Dourish, Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Inter- action, MIT Press, 2001

    P. Dourish, Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Inter- action, MIT Press, 2001

    2001

  9. [17]

    Prem, Principles of digital humanism: A critical post-humanist view, Journal of Responsible Technology 17 (2024) 100075

    E. Prem, Principles of digital humanism: A critical post-humanist view, Journal of Responsible Technology 17 (2024) 100075

    2024

  10. [18]

    B. Lee, D. Brown, B. Lee, C. Hurter, S. Drucker, T. Dwyer, Data visceralization: Enabling deeper understanding of data using virtual reality, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 27 (2) (2021) 1095–1105. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2020.3030435

    2021

  11. [19]

    Kirsh, Embodied cognition and the magical future of interaction de- sign, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 20 (1) (2013) 1–30

    D. Kirsh, Embodied cognition and the magical future of interaction de- sign, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 20 (1) (2013) 1–30. doi:10.1145/2442106.2442109

    2013

  12. [20]

    Spielhofer, T

    R. Spielhofer, T. Thrash, U. W. Hayek, A. Grˆ et-Regamey, B. Salak, J. Gr¨ ubel, V. Schinazi, Physiological and behavioral reactions to re- newable energy systems in various landscape types, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 135 (2021) 110410

    2021

  13. [21]

    Besan¸ con, A

    L. Besan¸ con, A. Ynnerman, D. F. Keefe, L. Yu, T. Isenberg, The state of the art of spatial interfaces for 3d visualization, Computer Graphics Forum 40 (1) (2021) 293–326. doi:10.1111/cgf.14189

    2021 doi

  14. [22]

    Schultes, M

    E. Schultes, M. Roos, L. O. Bonino da Silva Santos, G. Guizzardi, J. Bouwman, T. Hankemeier, A. Baak, B. Mons, Fair digital twins for data-intensive research, Front. in Big Data 5 (2022) 42

    2022

  15. [23]

    Aguilar, M

    L. Aguilar, M. Gath-Morad, J. Gr¨ ubel, J. Ermatinger, H. Zhao, S. Wehrli, R. W. Sumner, C. Zhang, D. Helbing, C. H¨ olscher, Ex- periments as code and its application to vr studies in human-building interaction, Scientific Reports 14 (1) (2024) 9883

    2024

  16. [24]

    Gr¨ ubel, The Design, Experiment, Analyse, and Reproduce Principle for Experimentation in Virtual Reality, Front

    J. Gr¨ ubel, The Design, Experiment, Analyse, and Reproduce Principle for Experimentation in Virtual Reality, Front. in Virt. Real. 4 (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    Google, Facade, NL, on Google Maps, https://www.google.com/ maps/search/maps/@51.9748662,5.6620094,41a,35y,336.19h, 79.27t/data=!3m1!1e3?entry=ttu, [Online; accessed 23-April-2024] (2024). 44

    2024

  18. [26]

    D. A. Bowman, R. P. McMahan, Virtual reality: How much immersion is enough?, Computer 40 (7) (2007) 36–43

    2007

  19. [27]

    Jerald, The VR Book: Human-centered design for virtual reality, first edition Edition, Vol

    J. Jerald, The VR Book: Human-centered design for virtual reality, first edition Edition, Vol. 8 of ACM Books, Association for Computing Machinery and Morgan & Claypool Publishers, New York, NY and San Rafael, 2016. URL http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2792790

    2016

  20. [28]

    Doerner, W

    R. Doerner, W. Broll, P. Grimm, B. Jung (Eds.), Virtual and Aug- mented Reality (VR/AR), Springer International Publishing, Cham,

  21. [30]

    P. A. Rauschnabel, R. Felix, C. Hinsch, H. Shahab, F. Alt, What is xr? towards a framework for augmented and virtual reality, Computers in Human Behavior 133 (2022) 107289. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022. 107289

    2022 doi

  22. [31]

    Slater, M

    M. Slater, M. V. Sanchez-Vives, Enhancing our lives with immersive virtual reality, Frontiers in Robotics and AI 3 (2016) 74.doi:10.3389/ frobt.2016.00074

    2016

  23. [32]

    Bailenson, Experience on demand: What virtual reality is, how it works, and what it can do, W

    J. Bailenson, Experience on demand: What virtual reality is, how it works, and what it can do, W. W. Norton & Company, New York, NY, 2018

    2018

  24. [33]

    Taleb, A

    T. Taleb, A. Boudi, L. Rosa, L. Cordeiro, T. Theodoropoulos, K. Tser- pes, P. Dazzi, A. I. Protopsaltis, R. Li, Toward supporting xr services: Architecture and enablers, IEEE Internet of Things Journal 10 (4) (2023) 3567–3586. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2022.3222103

    2023

  25. [34]

    Hilmersson, Terese and Lindstr¨ om, Ebba, Capturing the XR Market: Examining Strategies to Reach the Broader Market - An exploratory study of commercialization of XR enabled by 5G, Student Paper (2023). 45

    2023

  26. [35]

    Becker, C

    A. Becker, C. M. D. S. Freitas, Evaluation of xr applications: A tertiary review, ACM Comput. Surv. 56 (5) (nov 2023).doi:10.1145/3626517

    2023 doi

  27. [36]

    G. Z. Dane, S. Evers, P. E. W. den van Berg, A. Klippel, T. Verduijn, J. O. Wallgr¨ un, T. A. Arentze, Experiencing the future: Evaluating a new framework for the participatory co-design of healthy public spaces using immersive virtual reality, Computers, Environment and Urban...

  28. [37]

    J. Beck, M. Rainoldi, R. Egger, Virtual reality in tourism: a state-of- the-art review, Tourism Review 74 (3) (2019) 586–612. doi:10.1108/ TR-03-2017-0049

    2019

  29. [38]

    Kavanagh, A

    S. Kavanagh, A. Luxton-Reilly, B. Wuensche, B. Plimmer, A system- atic review of virtual reality in education, Themes in Science and Tech- nology Education 10 (2) (2017)

    2017

  30. [39]

    V. V. Abeele, B. Schraepen, H. Huygelier, C. Gillebert, K. Gerling, R. van Ee, Immersive virtual reality for older adults, ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 14 (3) (2021) 1–30. doi:10.1145/3470743

    2021 doi

  31. [40]

    Kitchin, The real-time city? big data and smart urbanism, Geo- Journal 79 (1) (2014) 1–14

    R. Kitchin, The real-time city? big data and smart urbanism, Geo- Journal 79 (1) (2014) 1–14. doi:10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8

    2014 doi

  32. [41]

    Bauer, T

    P. Bauer, T. Hoefler, B. Stevens, W. Hazeleger, Digital twins of earth and the computing challenge of human interaction, Na- ture computational science 4 (3) (2024) 154–157. doi:10.1038/ s43588-024-00599-3

    2024

  33. [42]

    J. Liu, J. Li, W. Li, J. Wu, Rethinking big data: A review on the data quality and usage issues, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 115 (2016) 134–142, theme issue ’State-of-the-art in photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information science’.doi: https:/...

    2016 doi

  34. [43]

    M. Chen, C. Claramunt, A. C ¸ ¨ oltekin, X. Liu, P. Peng, A. C. Robinson, D. Wang, J. Strobl, J. P. Wilson, M. Batty, M.-P. Kwan, M. Lotfian, F. Golay, S. Joost, J. Ingensand, A. M. Senousi, T. Cheng, T. Ban- drova, M. Konecny, P. M. Torrens, A. Klippel, S. Li, F. Zhang, L. He...

    2023

  35. [44]

    Jolly, L

    E. Jolly, L. J. Chang, The flatland fallacy: Moving beyond low–dimensional thinking, Topics in Cognitive Science 11 (2) (2019) 433–454. arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10. 1111/tops.12404, doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12404

    2019 doi

  36. [45]

    Helland, If you have too much data, then ’good enough’ is good enough, Commun

    P. Helland, If you have too much data, then ’good enough’ is good enough, Commun. ACM 54 (6) (2011) 40–47. doi:10.1145/1953122. 1953140

    2011 doi

  37. [46]

    S. I. H. Shah, V. Peristeras, I. Magnisalis, Government big data ecosys- tem: Definitions, types of data, actors, and roles and the impact in public administrations, J. Data and Information Quality 13 (2) (may 2021). doi:10.1145/3425709

    2021 doi

  38. [47]

    Shoumy, L

    N. Shoumy, L. Ang, K. Seng, D. Rahaman, T. Zia, Multimodal big data affective analytics: A comprehensive survey using text, audio, visual and physiological signals, Journal of Network and Computer Applications 149 (2020) 1–26. doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2019.102447

    2020

  39. [48]

    D. A. Keim, Visual exploration of large data sets, Commun. ACM 44 (8) (2001) 38–44. doi:10.1145/381641.381656

    2001

  40. [49]

    J. Tang, J. Liu, M. Zhang, Q. Mei, Visualizing large-scale and high- dimensional data, in: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW ’16, International World Wide Web Con- ferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, CHE, 2016, pp. ...

    2016

  41. [50]

    Dykes, A

    J. Dykes, A. M. MacEachren, M. J. Kraak (Eds.), Exploring Geovisu- alization, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2005

    2005

  42. [51]

    Batty, Digital twins in city planning, Nature Computational Science 4 (3) (2024) 192–199

    M. Batty, Digital twins in city planning, Nature Computational Science 4 (3) (2024) 192–199. doi:10.1038/s43588-024-00606-7

    2024 doi

  43. [52]

    Jones, C

    D. Jones, C. Snider, A. Nassehi, J. Yon, B. Hicks, Characterising the digital twin: A systematic literature review, CIRP Journal of Manu- facturing Science and Technology 29 (2020) 36–52. doi:10.1016/j. cirpj.2020.02.002. 47

    2020 doi

  44. [53]

    Glaessgen, D

    E. Glaessgen, D. Stargel, The digital twin paradigm for future nasa and u.s. air force vehicles, in: 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, 2012, pp. 1–12. doi:10.2514/6.2012-1818

    2012 doi

  45. [54]

    Korenhof, V

    P. Korenhof, V. Blok, S. Kloppenburg, Steering representations— towards a critical understanding of digital twins, Philosophy & Tech- nology 34 (4) (2021) 1751–1773. doi:10.1007/s13347-021-00484-1

    2021 doi

  46. [55]

    Batty, Digital twins, Environment and Planning B: Urban An- alytics and City Science 45 (5) (2018) 817–820

    M. Batty, Digital twins, Environment and Planning B: Urban An- alytics and City Science 45 (5) (2018) 817–820. doi:10.1177/ 2399808318796416

    2018

  47. [56]

    Gr¨ ubel, C

    J. Gr¨ ubel, C. V. Rios, C. Zuo, S. Ossey, R. M. Franken, M. Bala´ c, Y. Xin, K. W. Axhausen, M. Raubal, O. Riba-Grognuz, Outlining the open digital twin platform, 2023 IEEE Smart World Congress (SWC) (2023) 1–3

    2023

  48. [57]

    Talasila, C

    P. Talasila, C. Gomes, P. H. Mikkelsen, S. G. Arboleda, E. Kamburjan, P. G. Larsen, Digital twin as a service (dtaas): A platform for digi- tal twin developers and users, in: 2023 IEEE Smart World Congress (SWC), 2023, pp. 1–8. doi:10.1109/SWC57546.2023.10448890

    2023

  49. [58]

    Gr¨ ubel, T

    J. Gr¨ ubel, T. Thrash, L. Aguilar, M. Gath-Morad, D. H´ elal, R. W. Sumner, C. H¨ olscher, V. R. Schinazi, Dense indoor sensor networks: Towards passively sensing human presence with lorawan, Pervasive and Mobile Computing 84 (2022) 101640

    2022

  50. [59]

    E. Z. Victorelli, J. C. Dos Reis, H. Hornung, A. B. Prado, Understand- ing human-data interaction: Literature review and recommendations for design, International journal of human-computer studies 134 (2020) 13–32

    2020

  51. [60]

    Gr¨ ubel, M

    J. Gr¨ ubel, M. Gath-Morad, L. Aguilar, T. Thrash, R. W. Sumner, C. H¨ olscher, V. Schinazi, Fused twins: A cognitive approach to aug- mented reality media architecture, in: Proceedings of the 5th Media Architecture Biennale Conference, 2021, pp. 215–220

    2021

  52. [61]

    Hudson-Smith, M

    A. Hudson-Smith, M. Batty, Ubiquitous geographic information in the emergent metaverse, Transactions in GIS 26 (3) (2022) 48 1147–1157. arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/ 10.1111/tgis.12932, doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12932

    2022 doi

  53. [62]

    Thuvander, S

    L. Thuvander, S. Somanath, A. Hollberg, Procedural digital twin gen- eration for co-creating in vr focusing on vegetation, Int. Arch. Pho- togramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. (2022) 189–196 doi:10.5194/ isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W5-2022-189-2022

    2022

  54. [63]

    J. Keil, D. Edler, T. Schmitt, F. Dickmann, Creating immersive virtual environments based on open geospatial data and game engines, KN - Journal of Cartography and Geographic Information 71 (1) (2021) 53–

    2021

  55. [65]

    doi:10.1007/s42489-020-00069-6

    doi

  56. [66]

    L. W. Barsalou, Perceptual symbol systems, Behavioral and Brain Sci- ences 22 (4) (1999) 577–660. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99002149

    1999 doi

  57. [67]

    Clark, Microcognition: Philosophy, Cognitive Science, and Parallel Distributed Processing, MIT Press, 1989

    A. Clark, Microcognition: Philosophy, Cognitive Science, and Parallel Distributed Processing, MIT Press, 1989

    1989

  58. [68]

    L. A. Barba, Defining the role of open source software in research re- producibility, Computer 55 (8) (2022) 40–48. doi:10.1109/MC.2022. 3177133

    2022 doi

  59. [69]

    F. C. Rodr´ ıguez, M. Dal Peraro, L. A. Abriata, Democratizing inter- active, immersive experiences for science education with webxr, Na- ture computational science 1 (10) (2021) 631–632. doi:10.1038/ s43588-021-00142-8

    2021

  60. [70]

    M. D. Wilkinson, M. Dumontier, I. J. J. Aalbersberg, G. Appleton, M. Axton, A. Baak, N. Blomberg, J.-W. Boiten, L. B. Da Silva San- tos, P. E. Bourne, J. Bouwman, A. J. Brookes, T. Clark, M. Crosas, I. Dillo, O. Dumon, S. Edmunds, C. T. Evelo, R. Finkers, A. Gonzalez- Beltran,...

    2016

  61. [71]

    Baker, 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility, Nature 533 (7604) (2016) 452–454

    M. Baker, 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility, Nature 533 (7604) (2016) 452–454. doi:10.1038/533452a

    2016 doi

  62. [72]

    Google, Biesbosch, NL, on Google Maps, https://www.google.com/ maps/@51.7088591,4.7809869,5229a,35y,356.44h,29.94t/data= !3m1!1e3?entry=ttu, [Online; accessed 21-April-2024] (2024)

    2024

  63. [73]

    Shadbolt, K

    N. Shadbolt, K. O’Hara, T. Berners-Lee, N. Gibbins, H. Glaser, W. Hall, m. schraefel, Linked open government data: Lessons from data.gov.uk, IEEE Intelligent Systems 27 (3) (2012) 16–24. doi: 10.1109/MIS.2012.23

    2012 doi

  64. [74]

    html, [Online; accessed 21-April-2024] (2021)

    The Khronos ® 3D Formats Working Group, glTF 2.0 Specifica- tion, https://registry.khronos.org/glTF/specs/2.0/glTF-2.0. html, [Online; accessed 21-April-2024] (2021)

    2021

  65. [75]

    Schilling, J

    A. Schilling, J. Bolling, C. Nagel, Using gltf for streaming citygml 3d city models, in: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Web3D Technology, Web3D ’16, Association for Computing Machin- ery, New York, NY, USA, 2016, p. 109–116. doi:10.1145/2945292. 2945312

    2016 doi

  66. [76]

    Nielsen, Iterative user-interface design, Computer 26 (11) (1993) 32–41

    J. Nielsen, Iterative user-interface design, Computer 26 (11) (1993) 32–41. doi:10.1109/2.241424

    1993 doi

  67. [77]

    Flavell, UV Mapping, Apress, Berkeley, CA, 2010, Ch

    L. Flavell, UV Mapping, Apress, Berkeley, CA, 2010, Ch. 5, pp. 97–122. doi:10.1007/978-1-4302-3127-1\_5

    2010 doi

  68. [78]

    Bates, M

    D. Bates, M. M¨ achler, B. Bolker, S. Walker, Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4, Journal of Statistical Software 67 (1) (2015) 1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01. 50

    2015 doi

  69. [79]

    Q. Shan, R. Adams, B. Curless, Y. Furukawa, S. M. Seitz, The visual turing test for scene reconstruction, in: 2013 International Conference on 3D Vision-3DV 2013, IEEE, 2013, pp. 25–32

    2013

  70. [80]

    Wilkinson, C

    G. Wilkinson, C. Rogers, Symbolic description of factorial models for analysis of variance, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics 22 (3) (1973) 392–399

    1973

  71. [81]

    B¨ urkner, brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan, Journal of Statistical Software 80 (1) (2017) 1–28

    P.-C. B¨ urkner, brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan, Journal of Statistical Software 80 (1) (2017) 1–28. doi: 10.18637/jss.v080.i01

    2017 doi

  72. [82]

    Hainmueller, D

    J. Hainmueller, D. Hangartner, T. Yamamoto, Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (8) (2015) 2395–2400

    2015

  73. [83]

    CLIFFORD, G

    S. CLIFFORD, G. SHEAGLEY, S. PISTON, Increasing precision with- out altering treatment effects: Repeated measures designs in sur- vey experiments, American Political Science Review 115 (3) (2021) 1048–1065. doi:10.1017/S0003055421000241

    2021 doi

  74. [84]

    S. M. Weisberg, V. R. Schinazi, N. S. Newcombe, T. F. Shipley, R. A. Epstein, Variations in cognitive maps: understanding individual differ- ences in navigation., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 40 (3) (2014) 669

    2014

  75. [85]

    Arel-Bundock, N

    V. Arel-Bundock, N. Greifer, A. Heiss, How to interpret statistical models using marginaleffects for R and Python, Journal of Statistical Software 111 (9) (2024) 1–32. doi:10.18637/jss.v111.i09

    2024 doi

  76. [86]

    Huang, The effects of visual realism on cognitive constructs, spatial memory and learning in virtual reality, Ph.D

    J. Huang, The effects of visual realism on cognitive constructs, spatial memory and learning in virtual reality, Ph.D. thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA (2021)

    2021

  77. [87]

    Huang, A

    J. Huang, A. Klippel, The effects of visual realism on spatial mem- ory and exploration patterns in virtual reality, in: R. J. Teather (Ed.), VRST ’20: 26th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Soft- ware and Technology, ACM Digital Library, Association for Comput- ing Machinery, ...

    2020

  78. [88]

    M. Y.-C. Yim, S.-C. Chu, P. L. Sauer, Is augmented reality tech- nology an effective tool for e-commerce? an interactivity and vivid- ness perspective, Journal of Interactive Marketing 39 (2017) 89–103. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2017.04.001

    2017 doi

  79. [89]

    M. Park, J. Yoo, Effects of perceived interactivity of augmented re- ality on consumer responses: A mental imagery perspective, Jour- nal of Retailing and Consumer Services 52 (2020) 101912. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101912. 51

    2020

  80. [90]

    P. A. Lopez, M. Behrisch, L. Bieker-Walz, J. Erdmann, Y.-P. Fl¨ otter¨ od, R. Hilbrich, L. L¨ ucken, J. Rummel, P. Wagner, E. Wießner, Micro- scopic traffic simulation using sumo, in: 2018 21st international con- ference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC), Ieee, 2018...

    2018

  81. [91]

    Gr¨ ubel, C

    J. Gr¨ ubel, C. Vivar Rios, M. Bala´ c, Y. Xin, R. M. Franken, S. Ossey, M. Raubal, K. W. Axhausen, O. Riba-Grognuz, Ch on the move: In- troducing the prototype digital twin of the swiss mobility system, in: 23rd Swiss Transport Research Conference (STRC 2023), STRC, 2023

    2023

  82. [92]

    Gomes, G

    V. Gomes, G. Queiroz, K. Ferreira, An overview of platforms for big earth observation data management and analysis, Remote Sens- ing 12 (8) (2020) 1253. doi:10.3390/rs12081253

    2020 doi

  83. [93]

    Coetzee, I

    S. Coetzee, I. Iv´ anov´ a, H. Mitasova, M. Brovelli, Open geospatial soft- ware and data: A review of the current state and a perspective into the future, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 9 (2) (2020)

    2020

  84. [94]

    doi:10.3390/ijgi9020090

    doi

  85. [95]

    D. Sui, S. Elwood, M. Goodchild (Eds.), Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2013. doi:10.1007/ 978-94-007-4587-2

    2013

  86. [96]

    Vohland, A

    K. Vohland, A. Land-Zandstra, L. Ceccaroni, R. Lemmens, J. Perell´ o, M. Ponti, R. Samson, K. Wagenknecht (Eds.), The Science of Citizen Science, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2021.doi:10.1007/ 978-3-030-58278-4

    2021

  87. [97]

    Fritz, C

    S. Fritz, C. Fonte, L. See, The role of citizen science in earth observa- tion, Remote Sensing 9 (4) (2017) 357. doi:10.3390/rs9040357

    2017 doi

  88. [98]

    Z. Xian, T. Gervet, Z. Xu, Y.-L. Qiao, T.-H. Wang, Y. Wang, Towards generalist robots: A promising paradigm via generative simulation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10455 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  89. [99]

    Ratican, J

    J. Ratican, J. Hutson, A. Wright, A proposed meta-reality immersive development pipeline: Generative ai models and extended reality (xr) content for the metaverse, Journal of Intelligent Learning Systems and Applications 15 (01) (2023) 24–35. doi:10.4236/jilsa.2023.151002. 52

    2023

  90. [100]

    Edler, A

    D. Edler, A. Husar, J. Keil, M. Vetter, F. Dickmann, Virtual reality (vr) and open source software: A workflow for constructing an interactive cartographic vr environment to explore urban landscapes, KN - Journal of Cartography and Geographic Information 68 (1) (2018) 5–13. do...

    2018 doi

  91. [101]

    Mystakidis, Metaverse, Encyclopedia 2 (1) (2022) 486–497

    S. Mystakidis, Metaverse, Encyclopedia 2 (1) (2022) 486–497. doi: 10.3390/encyclopedia2010031

    2022 doi

  92. [102]

    Mavros, N

    P. Mavros, N. Z. Liang, S. Kirk, A. Te, J. Gr¨ ubel, L. A. Melgar, A. O. Guizzo, D. Makowski, Attenuating subjective crowding through beauty: an online study on the interaction between environment aes- thetics, typology and crowdedness

  93. [103]

    Y. Weng, M. Han, H. He, X. Chang, B. Zhuang, Longvlm: Efficient long video understanding via large language models, in: European Con- ference on Computer Vision, Springer, 2024, pp. 453–470

    2024

  94. [104]

    L. M. Padilla, S. H. Creem-Regehr, M. Hegarty, J. K. Stefanucci, De- cision making with visualizations: a cognitive framework across disci- plines, Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 3 (2018) 29. doi:10.1186/s41235-018-0120-9

    2018 doi

  95. [105]

    Falco, R

    E. Falco, R. Kleinhans, Digital participatory platforms for co- production in urban development, in: I. R. Management Associa- tion (Ed.), Crowdsourcing, IGI Global, 2019, pp. 663–690. doi: 10.4018/978-1-5225-8362-2.ch033

    2019 doi

  96. [106]

    J. J. Thomas, K. A. Cook (Eds.), Illuminating the path: Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics, IEEE Press, Richland, WA, 2005

    2005

  97. [107]

    H. Li, B. Li, The state of metaverse research: a bibliometric visual analysis based on citespace, Journal of Big Data 11 (1) (2024). doi: 10.1186/s40537-024-00877-x

    2024 doi

  98. [108]

    Pidel, P

    C. Pidel, P. Ackermann, Collaboration in virtual and augmented re- ality: A systematic overview, in: L. T. de Paolis, P. Bourdot (Eds.), Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, and Computer Graphics, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020, pp. 141–156. 53

    2020

  99. [109]

    Y. K. Dwivedi, L. Hughes, Y. Wang, A. A. Alalwan, S. J. Ahn, J. Bal- akrishnan, S. Barta, R. Belk, D. Buhalis, V. Dutot, R. Felix, R. Filieri, C. Flavi´ an, A. Gustafsson, C. Hinsch, S. Hollensen, V. Jain, J. Kim, A. S. Krishen, J. O. Lartey, N. Pandey, S. Ribeiro-Navarrete, R...

    2023

  100. [110]

    Ketzler, V

    B. Ketzler, V. Naserentin, F. Latino, C. Zangelidis, L. Thuvander, A. Logg, Digital twins for cities: A state of the art review, Built Envi- ronment 46 (4) (2020) 547–573. doi:10.2148/benv.46.4.547

    2020 doi

  101. [111]

    J., Making climate change visible: A critical role for landscape professionals, Landscape and Urban Planning 142 (2015) 95–105

    Sheppard, Stephen R. J., Making climate change visible: A critical role for landscape professionals, Landscape and Urban Planning 142 (2015) 95–105. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.07.006

    2015 doi

  102. [112]

    Evers, G

    S. Evers, G. Z. Dane, P. E. W. van den Berg, A. K. A. J. Klippel, T. Ver- duijn, T. A. Arentze, Designing healthy public spaces: A participatory approach through immersive virtual reality, in: AGILE GIScience Se- ries, Vol. 4, 2023, pp. 1–8. doi:10.5194/agile-giss-4-24-2023

    2023 doi

  103. [113]

    Beech, M

    E. Beech, M. Rivers, S. Oldfield, P. P. Smith, Globaltreesearch: The first complete global database of tree species and country distributions, Journal of Sustainable Forestry 36 (5) (2017) 454–489. doi:10.1080/ 10549811.2017.1310049. 54

    2017

  104. [114]

    Wu, Y.-J

    T. Wu, Y.-J. Yuan, L.-X. Zhang, J. Yang, Y.-P. Cao, L.-Q. Yan, L. Gao, Recent advances in 3d gaussian splatting, Computational Visual Media 10 (4) (2024) 613–642. doi:10.1007/s41095-024-0436-y

    2024 doi

  105. [115]

    J. L. Safanelli, T. Hengl, L. L. Parente, R. Minarik, D. E. Bloom, K. Todd-Brown, A. Gholizadeh, W. d. S. Mendes, J. Sanderman, Open soil spectral library (ossl): Building reproducible soil calibration mod- els through open development and community engagement, PloS one 20 (1)...

    2025 doi

  106. [116]

    Lewis, E

    P. Lewis, E. Perez, A. Piktus, F. Petroni, V. Karpukhin, N. Goyal, H. K¨ uttler, M. Lewis, W.-t. Yih, T. Rockt¨ aschel, et al., Retrieval- augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks, Advances in neural information processing systems 33 (2020) 9459–9474

    2020

  107. [117]

    J. Zhan, S. Wu, J. Qi, J. Zeng, M. Qin, Y. Wang, Z. Du, A generalized spatial autoregressive neural network method for three-dimensional spatial interpolation, Geoscientific Model Development 16 (10) (2023) 2777–2794. doi:10.5194/gmd-16-2777-2023 . URL https://gmd.copernicus.o...

    2023 doi

  108. [118]

    C. Gan, D. Yang, B. Hu, H. Zhang, S. Li, Z. Liu, Y. Shen, L. Ju, Z. Zhang, J. Gu, et al., Similarity is not all you need: Endowing retrieval augmented generation with multi layered thoughts, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.19893 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  109. [120]

    Gr¨ ubel, Experiments as dts, in: Handbook of Digital Twins, CRC Press, pp

    J. Gr¨ ubel, Experiments as dts, in: Handbook of Digital Twins, CRC Press, pp. 563–583

  110. [121]

    V. R. Schinazi, D. Meloni, J. Gr¨ ubel, D. J. Angus, O. Baumann, R. P. Weibel, P. Jeszenszky, C. H¨ olscher, T. Thrash, Motivation moderates gender differences in navigation performance, Scientific Reports 13 (1) (2023) 15995. Appendix A. Regression models 55 Table A.2: Statis...

    2023

  111. [2022]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79062-2

    doi:10.1007/978-3-030-79062-2 . URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79062-2

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.