Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Unconventional magnetism in spin-orbit coupled systems

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that explicit spin-orbit coupling decomposes p-wave unconventional magnetic order into scalar (gyrotropic), vector (Rashba), and tensor (Dresselhaus) channels, and 2D d-wave order into $J_z=\pm1,\pm2,\pm3$ channels, with…

desk verdict A useful SO(3)_J / O(2)_J symmetry classification of SOC-split unconventional magnetism, but the phase diagrams are less generic than the text implies — worth reading and worth refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.14577 v1 pith:M6D6IQW2 submitted 2025-04-20 cond-mat.str-el

Jian-Keng Yuan , Zhiming Pan , Congjun Wu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords unconventionalmagnetismspin-orbitcouplingGinzburg-Landautheoryp-wavemagneticorderd-wavealtermagnetismGoldstonemodesspin-momentumlocking
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper works out what happens to unconventional magnetism—spin order that is not uniform but varies in patterns over the Fermi surface—when spin-orbit coupling is explicitly present, as it always is in real crystals. Using a Ginzburg-Landau free energy truncated at quartic order, it shows that 3D p-wave order splits into three sectors tied to total angular momentum: a gyrotropic scalar (spin parallel to momentum), a Rashba-type vector, and a Dresselhaus-type traceless symmetric tensor. The same analysis in 2D splits d-wave order into $J_z=\pm1$, $\pm2$, and $\pm3$ channels, whose spin textures wind around the Fermi surface with winding numbers $-2$, $0$, and $+2$. The quartic term mixes these sectors, and the paper maps which $\alpha$-phase, $\beta$-phase, or mixed state is realized in each parameter regime. The result matters because the signs of the Landau coefficients, not just the band dispersion, fix the symmetry class of the magnetic state.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the order-parameter matrix $n_{\mu b}=\langle \psi^\dagger \sigma_\mu g_b^{(l)}(-i\nabla)\psi\rangle$ and the Ginzburg-Landau functional $F[n]=\alpha\,\mathrm{Tr}(nn^{\mathrm T})+\beta_1[\mathrm{Tr}(nn^{\mathrm T})]^2+\beta_2\,\mathrm{Tr}[(nn^{\mathrm T})^2]$. Under spin-orbit coupling the quadratic term splits into channel coefficients ($\alpha_0,\alpha_1,\alpha_2$ in 3D; $\alpha_1,\alpha_2,\alpha_3$ in 2D), and the $\beta_2$ quartic term is the term that mixes the sectors. Minimization is carried out by singular value decomposition $n=U\Sigma V^{\mathrm T}$, reducing the problem to the singular values $f_i$; linear stability analysis of the isotropic solution yields the analytic phase boundary $|\beta_{2c}|=3|\Delta\alpha_0||\beta_1|/(2|\alpha|+3|\Delta\alpha_0|)$ in 3D, and the corresponding boundary $\beta_2=-\beta_1|\alpha|/\Delta\alpha_2$ in 2D.

What would settle it

Compute or measure the three quadratic coefficients $\alpha_0,\alpha_1,\alpha_2$ (or $\alpha_1,\alpha_2,\alpha_3$ in 2D) for a candidate unconventional magnet; if the two assumed degenerate coefficients differ by an amount comparable to $\beta_2$ times the order-parameter scale, the paper's phase diagrams in Figs. 4 and 6 do not apply to that material. More directly, spin-resolved photoemission on a d-wave altermagnet with sizable spin-orbit coupling should reveal either the $w=-2$ anti-vortex texture of the $J_z=1$ sector or the $w=+2$ vortex of the $J_z=3$ sector; a collinear two-ellipse Fermi surface with neither winding pattern would contradict the classification.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that explicit spin-orbit coupling reorganizes unconventional magnetic order according to the residual $\text{SO}(3)_J$ group: the p-wave order parameter $n_{\mu b}$ decomposes as $n=T+A+S$ into $J=0$, $J=1$, and $J=2$ irreducible representations, corresponding to gyrotropic, Rashba, and Dresselhaus-type spin-momentum lockings (Eqs. 18-20); in 2D the d-wave order parameter decomposes into $T_1,T_2,T_3$ carrying $J_z=\pm1,\pm2,\pm3$ (Eqs. 44-46). At quadratic level the three channels have different coefficients $\alpha_0,\alpha_1,\alpha_2$, so they can order independently; at quartic level the $\beta_2$ term mixes them and, together with the splitting $\Delta\alpha_0$ (or $\Delta\alpha_2$ in 2D), selects the ground state. The paper computes the phase diagrams: for 3D p-wave, $\beta_2<0$ favors the $\alpha$-phase with shifted, oppositely distorted Fermi surfaces and $\beta_2>0$ favors $\beta$-phase textures, with a gyrotropic-to-anisotropic boundary given analytically in Eq. A5; for 2D d-wave, the four quadrants of $(\Delta\alpha_2,\beta_2)$ give the in-plane $\alpha$-phase, in-plane $\beta$-phase, pure $J_z=2$ altermagnetic $\alpha$-phase, and a mixed $f_1>f_2>0$ phase whose boundary is found analytically. The paper concludes that spin-orbit coupling plays the role of magnetic anisotropy for unconventional magnetism and that spin-group-type symmetry seen in the single-particle dispersion is not a symmetry of the full Hamiltonian.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that, after spin-orbit coupling is turned on, two of the three competing order-parameter channels remain exactly degenerate in energy; real materials will generically split all three, which would move or reshape the computed phase boundaries.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In 3D p-wave systems, the realized spin-momentum locking—gyrotropic, Rashba-type, or Dresselhaus-type—is fixed by the signs of the quadratic coefficients and $\beta_2$, not by the band structure alone.
  • In 2D d-wave systems, the same Ginzburg-Landau analysis places the collinear altermagnetic state ($J_z=2$) in the $\alpha$-phase selected when $\beta_2<0$ and $\Delta\alpha_2<0$; elsewhere in-plane $\alpha$, in-plane $\beta$, or mixed states appear.
  • Each phase has a distinct Goldstone-mode and defect content: the Rashba sector has an $S^2$ Goldstone manifold, the $J=2$ sector $S^2/Z_2$, and the $\Delta\alpha_0>0$ $\alpha$-phase $\text{SO}(3)/Z_2$ with $\pi_1=Z_4$ line defects.
  • The single-particle dispersion of a magnetic state under spin-orbit coupling may show spin-group-type symmetry even when the full Hamiltonian does not, so experimental claims of altermagnetism in strong-spin-orbit materials need many-body evidence.
  • The analytic boundaries (Eq. A5 and the Appendix B condition) provide direct checks that can be compared with microscopic Landau-parameter calculations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the degeneracy assumption is relaxed, the phase diagram acquires three genuinely independent quadratic coefficients; the qualitative $J$-sector decomposition and the existence of $\alpha$/ $\beta$/mixed phases are likely to survive, but the location and possibly the topology of the boundaries in Figs. 4 and 6 would change.
  • The paper's caution about spin-group symmetry suggests a practical test for candidate altermagnets with heavy elements: spin-resolved measurements of collective modes or topological defects, not just Fermi-surface splitting, are needed to confirm the true symmetry class.
  • The same $\text{SO}(3)_J$ and $\text{O}(2)_J$ decomposition procedure should extend to higher partial waves and to spin-$3/2$ systems, where more total-angular-momentum sectors appear and the quartic mixing should produce richer phase diagrams.
  • The winding-number signatures ($\pm2$ for the $J_z=1$ and $J_z=3$ d-wave textures) give a direct experimental discriminator: spin-resolved photoemission or quasiparticle-interference imaging could identify which channel actually orders.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper studies unconventional magnetic order in spin-orbit coupled systems, using Ginzburg-Landau theory for a 3D p-wave channel and a 2D d-wave channel. In the presence of explicit SOC, the independent spin and orbital rotation groups are locked to SO(3)_J (or O(2)_J), and the order parameter matrix n_{\mu b} decomposes into J=0 (gyrotropic), J=1 (Rashba), and J=2 (Dresselhaus) sectors in 3D, and J_z=1,2,3 sectors in 2D. The authors construct quadratic GL terms with SOC-induced splittings, add quartic \beta1 and \beta2 terms, minimize the resulting free energies (analytically in the appendices and numerically in figures), and obtain phase diagrams separating the collinear \alpha-phase, the non-collinear \beta-phase, and mixtures. They also compute effective spin-momentum locking Hamiltonians, Goldstone manifolds, and homotopy groups, and argue that spin-group-type symmetries visible in the single-particle dispersion need not be symmetries of the full many-body Hamiltonian.

Significance. The symmetry decomposition and the associated spin-texture classification are clear and useful; the gyrotropic/Rashba/Dresselhaus and J_z=1,2,3 sector analysis provides a compact organizing principle. The Goldstone-manifold and topological-defect computations (including \pi_1(SO(3)_J/Z_2)=Z_4) are internally consistent, and the analytic minimizations are checked numerically within the model. The warning about over-interpreting spin-group symmetries from Fermi-surface features is timely. The phase diagram portion, however, is conditional: it holds for a restricted quartic ansatz and for special degeneracies of the quadratic coefficients, so the generic predictive content for real materials is more limited than the text sometimes suggests.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sect. III B and IV C; Eqs. (6), (20), (30), (A1), (46), (50), (B1)] The quartic ansatz used throughout is not the most general functional invariant under the remaining spin-orbit symmetry. In 3D, under n -> R n R^T with R in SO(3)_J, both (Tr n)^4 and (Tr n)^2 Tr(n n^T) are separately invariant and are even under the parity and time-reversal transformations of Sec. II A; they are not expressible as combinations of \beta_1[Tr(n n^T)]^2 and \beta_2 Tr[(n n^T)^2]. In 2D, terms such as (n_z1^2+n_z2^2)(|n_1|^2+|n_2|^2) are likewise allowed by O(2)_J and are absent from Eq. (50). The minimizations in Appendices A and B and the boundaries Eq. (A5) and the f_2=0 boundary in Appendix B therefore describe a codimension-2 (3D) or codimension-1 (2D) slice of quartic coupling space. The numerical minimizations in Figs. A2 and A4 use the same truncated functional, so they cannot justify the truncation as generic. If the authors intend a model study, this restriction should be stated when Eqs. (6) and (50) are introduced; as written, Eqs. (A5), (37), (54) and Figs. 4 and 6 are presented as the phase diagram of spin-orbit coupled unconventional magnetism.
  2. [Sect. IV A, Eqs. (44)-(46) and text after Eq. (49)] The definitions of T1 and T3 are inconsistent with the quadratic coefficients and with the quoted single-channel conditions. With Eq. (44) as written, T1 \cdot T1 equals the third term in Eq. (46), and T3 \cdot T3 equals the first term. Moreover, the condition "ordering in the T1 channel, nx1=-ny2, ny1=nx2" gives T1=(0,0) and nonzero T3, while the condition given for the J=3 channel (nx1=ny2, nx2=-ny1) gives T3=(0,0) and nonzero T1. Thus the assignment of J_z=1 and J_z=3 to the anti-vortex (w=-2) and vortex (w=+2) textures in Fig. 5 is reversed as printed. Because the later minimization sets \alpha_1=\alpha_3, the phase boundaries in Fig. 6 are not affected, but the classification statements in Section IV B need to be corrected.
minor comments (5)
  1. [References] References [5] and [6] are the same paper; one of the citations in Section III A appears to be misnumbered.
  2. [Appendix A after Eq. (A5)] The text says "Exact analytic solution for the critical boundary can be obtained..." and then says "There is no straightforward functional form..."; please clarify whether Eq. (A5) is the spinodal boundary and state what the numerical comparison in Fig. A2 actually tests.
  3. [Eq. (22)] The notation d^2 \hat{k} and the integration domain in the winding-number formula should be defined explicitly.
  4. [Sect. IV C, paragraph after Eq. (51)] The statement that the superposition of w=+2 and w=-2 states yields the \alpha-phase with in-plane spins needs a short derivation; as written it is not clear which coefficients are superposed.
  5. [Fig. 5 caption] The caption does not explicitly connect panels (a), (b), and (c) to the J_z=1, 2, and 3 channels; please add this correspondence.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the J-sector decomposition is representation theory, and the phase diagrams are explicit minimizations of a stated GL ansatz with no fitted predictions.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are of two kinds. First, the decomposition of the p-wave order parameter into J=0,1,2 sectors (Eqs. 18-19) and of the 2D d-wave order parameter into Jz=1,2,3 sectors (Eq. 44) is a direct application of representation theory under SO(3)_J and O(2)_J; these statements define the sectors rather than predict them from fitted inputs. Second, the phase boundaries and ground-state configurations are obtained by explicit minimization of the stated Ginzburg-Landau functionals (Eqs. A1 and B1), with no parameters fitted to data and no externally reported quantity being "predicted" after calibration. The acknowledged simplifications that two quadratic coefficients are set equal (α1=α2=α in 3D, α1=α3=α in 2D) are explicitly stated modeling choices, not hidden fits. The skeptic's concern that additional quartic invariants such as (Tr n)^2 Tr(nnt) and (Tr n)^4 are allowed under SO(3)_J and are omitted is a completeness/validity question about the GL truncation, not a circularity: the computed phase diagrams are conditional on the quoted free energy. Self-citations to Refs. [1,2] supply the no-SOC GL form and the α/β-phase terminology, but those are prior peer-reviewed results with independent derivations, and the new SOC-split analysis is carried out from the quoted equations rather than assumed through citation. No step in the derivation reduces by construction to its own input, so the paper is not materially circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fits to data are performed. The new phase diagrams are computed from the GL ansatz within the paper. The principal source of self-reference is that the GL framework itself, the alpha/beta phase language, and the order parameter definitions come from Refs. [1,2,4,5] authored or co-authored by Congjun Wu, a co-author of the present paper. These prior results are established and independently derivable from Fermi liquid theory, so the circularity burden is mild. No new particles, fields, or conserved quantities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • GL coefficients alpha, beta1, beta2
    Phenomenological Landau coefficients entering Eqs. (6), (20), (50). The phase structure depends on their signs and relative magnitudes (e.g., beta2 < 0 versus beta2 > 0 selects alpha versus beta phases), but the paper fits none of them to data.
  • SOC splitting Delta_alpha0 (3D p-wave, J = 0 sector)
    Quadratic splitting of the gyrotropic channel in Eq. (30). The p-wave phase diagram of Fig. 4 is organized in the (beta2, Delta_alpha0) plane.
  • SOC splitting Delta_alpha2 (2D d-wave, Jz = 2 sector)
    Quadratic splitting of the out-of-plane channel in Eq. (50). The d-wave phase diagram of Fig. 6 is organized in the (beta2, Delta_alpha2) plane.
  • Illustrative numeric GL parameters = alpha = -10, beta1 = 10, Delta_alpha0/3 = -0.5, Delta_alpha2 = -2
    Chosen by hand to produce Figs. A1-A4. Illustrative only and not used to make quantitative predictions.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The Ginzburg-Landau free energy truncated at quartic order, Eqs. (6), (20), (30), (46), (50), with the stated symmetries describes the ordered state.
    The entire analysis is a Landau expansion around the disordered Fermi liquid. The coefficients alpha, beta1, beta2 are not derived from a microscopic model in this paper.
  • domain assumption The order parameter n_mu b (Eqs. 1-3) and its transformation rules under SO(3)_S x SO(3)_L (Eq. 5) are taken from the spin-channel Pomeranchuk instability framework of Refs. [1,2].
    The paper imports the unconventional magnetism order parameter and its symmetry classification from the authors' prior Fermi liquid work.
  • ad hoc to paper Exact degeneracy of the non-split quadratic channels under SOC: alpha1 = alpha2 = alpha in 3D (Sect. III B) and alpha1 = alpha3 = alpha in 2D (Sect. IV C).
    A simplification made so the quartic mixing analysis is tractable. The phase diagrams are proven only in these two planes of coefficient space, and generic microscopic models will not satisfy the degeneracy.
  • standard math Standard mathematics used for the SVD minimization and for Goldstone manifold and defect classification, e.g., pi1(SO(3)_J/Z2) = Z4, pi1(RP2) = Z2.
    Unproved background mathematics invoked in Sects. II-IV and Appendices A-B.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Unconventional magnetism in spin-orbit coupled systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/M6D6IQW2

@misc{pith2026250414577,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Unconventional magnetism in spin-orbit coupled systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/M6D6IQW2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.14577}
}
abstract

``Unconventional magnetism" was proposed to describe the exotic states arising from Landau-Pomeranchuk instabilities in the spin channel nearly two decades ago. Its odd-partial-wave-channel (e.g. $p$-wave) states break parity giving rise to the dynamic generation of spin-orbit coupling, while its even-partial-wave-channel (e.g. $d$-wave) states break time-reversal symmetry. Both types of states can exhibit collinear and non-collinear spin configurations over Fermi surfaces with the former and latter termed as the $\alpha$ and $\beta$-phases, respectively. The collinear states in even partial-wave channels are in the same symmetry class of ``altermagnetism". In this work, we investigate unconventional magnetism in both $p$- and $d$-wave channels within spin-orbit coupled systems with parity and time-reversal symmetries maintained. Based on the Ginzburg-Landau free energy analysis, the $p$-wave channel yields the gyrotropic, Rashba, Dresselhaus-type spin-orbit couplings. They compete and mix evolving from the $\beta$-phase to the $\alpha$-phase with various types of spin-momentum lockings. Analyses are performed in parallel for the $d$-wave unconventional magnetism. We emphasize that the single-particle dispersion is not sufficient to justify the spin-group type symmetry of the full Hamiltonian. Furthermore, Goldstone manifolds and excitations are examined in each unconventional magnetic phase.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.14577 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Fermi surface distortions in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Fermi surface and spin-texture in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Schematic illustration of spin textures on the Fermi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Schematic phase diagram illustrating the phases as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Spin configurations in momentum space around the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Schematic phase diagram in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Altermagnetic type-II Multiferroics with N\'{e}el-order-locked Electric Polarization

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Altermagnetic Néel order generates locked electric polarization in type-II multiferroics, with a microscopic mechanism, eight symmetry categories for 2D cases, and a first-principles example in monolayer MgFe2N2.

  2. Altermagnetism and Superconductivity: A Short Historical Review

    cond-mat.supr-con 2025-10 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A historical review unifies electronic liquid-crystal phases, multipole expansions, and altermagnetism under nonrelativistic spin-momentum locking, and surveys the resulting unconventional superconductivity.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [5]

    spin-group

    d-wave unconventional magnetism with ∆α2 < 0 We now turn to the parameter regime of ∆ α2 < 0. According to the GL free energy functional, the ∆ α2- term energetically favors configurations that maximize the components of the order parameter along the z-axis in spin space. The ground state structure is further de- termined by the sign of β2. Whenβ2 < 0, it...

    work page

  2. [6]

    37 in the maintext

    and an anisotropic term characteristic of the α-phase (favored by β2 < 0), giving rise to the Eq. 37 in the maintext. Appendix B: Details of the GL analysis in 2D The Landau functional up to the quartic order in the presence ofd-wave unconventional magnetism is given by, F [n] =α Tr nnt + ∆α2 n2 z1 +n2 z2 +β1 Tr(nnt) 2 +β2 Tr nnt 2 , (B1) or in the form F...

    work page

  3. [1]

    al- termagnetism

    for the p-wave channel (l = 1) and the d-wave channel (l = 2). The resulting α-state exhibits Fermi surface splitting for the opposite spin orientation, as depicted in Fig. (1) . Of particular contemporary interest is the l = 2 partial- wave (d-wave) channel realization in this phase, which manifests as a momentum-dependent spin-splitting of the Fermi sur...

    work page

  4. [2]

    In other words, the order parameter nµb prefers to project out the component of J = 0 and keep the components of J = 1 and 2

    Explicit SO symmetry breaking with ∆α0 > 0 For ∆α0 > 0, the minimization of the GL free en- ergy favors the solution satisfying the traceless condition Trn = 0. In other words, the order parameter nµb prefers to project out the component of J = 0 and keep the components of J = 1 and 2. The phase diagram and the corresponding spin-momentum configurations a...

    work page

  5. [3]

    altermag- netic

    Explicit SO symmetry breaking with ∆α0 < 0 The situation that β2 > 0 favors the β-phase, and the gyrotropic state (J = 0) favored by ∆ α0 < 0 also be- longs to the β-phase. Hence, at β2 > 0, the ground state takes the gyrotropic state, i.e.,nµa = ¯nδµa. This is a Z2 symmetry breaking phase, i.e., parity breaking, but the SO(3)J symmetry is maintained. 7 T...

    work page

  6. [4]

    The order parameters in terms of ⃗ n1 and ⃗ n2 tend to project out their z-component in spin orientation

    d-wave unconventional magnetism with ∆α2 > 0 When ∆α2 > 0, the ∆ α2 n2 z1 +n2 z2 -term disfavors the Jz = 2 component. The order parameters in terms of ⃗ n1 and ⃗ n2 tend to project out their z-component in spin orientation. The β2 term further selects the specific ground state configuration. If β2 < 0, the term−2β2|n1×n2|2 is minimized when ⃗ n1∥⃗ n2. Th...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Wu and S.-C

    C. Wu and S.-C. Zhang, Dynamic generation of spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 036403 (2004)

    2004

  8. [8]

    C. Wu, K. Sun, E. Fradkin, and S.-C. Zhang, Fermi liquid instabilities in the spin channel, Phys. Rev. B 75, 115103 (2007)

    2007

Show all 36 references
  1. [9]

    The earliest online record of the term unconven- tional magnetism appears in a talk given by Wu at the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics on May 16, 2007, https://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/ coldatoms07/wu1/ (2007)

    2007

  2. [10]

    Lee and C

    W.-C. Lee and C. Wu, Theory of unconventional meta- magnetic electron states in orbital band systems, Phys. Rev. B 80, 104438 (2009)

    2009

  3. [12]

    Li and C

    Y. Li and C. Wu, Spin-orbit coupled fermi liquid theory of ultracold magnetic dipolar fermions, Phys. Rev. B 85, 205126 (2012)

    2012

  4. [13]

    I. I. Pomeranchuk et al., On the stability of a fermi liquid, Sov. Phys. JETP 8, 361 (1958)

    1958

  5. [14]

    J. E. Hirsch, Spin-split states in metals, Phys. Rev. B 41, 6820 (1990)

    1990

  6. [15]

    J. E. Hirsch, Chromium: A possible spin-split metal, Phys. Rev. B 41, 6828 (1990)

    1990

  7. [16]

    Oganesyan, S

    V. Oganesyan, S. A. Kivelson, and E. Fradkin, Quantum theory of a nematic fermi fluid, Phys. Rev. B 64, 195109 (2001)

    2001

  8. [17]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  9. [18]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  10. [19]

    P. Liu, J. Li, J. Han, X. Wan, and Q. Liu, Spin-group symmetry in magnetic materials with negligible spin- orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. X 12, 021016 (2022)

    2022

  11. [20]

    Z. Xiao, J. Zhao, Y. Li, R. Shindou, and Z.-D. Song, Spin space groups: full classification and applications, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031037 (2024)

    2024

  12. [21]

    X. Chen, J. Ren, Y. Zhu, Y. Yu, A. Zhang, P. Liu, J. Li, Y. Liu, C. Li, and Q. Liu, Enumeration and representa- tion theory of spin space groups, Phys. Rev. X14, 031038 (2024)

    2024

  13. [22]

    Jiang, Z

    Y. Jiang, Z. Song, T. Zhu, Z. Fang, H. Weng, Z.-X. Liu, J. Yang, and C. Fang, Enumeration of spin-space groups: Towards a complete description of symmetries of mag- netic orders, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031039 (2024)

    2024

  14. [23]

    Z. Feng, X. Zhou, L. ˇSmejkal, L. Wu, Z. Zhu, H. Guo, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, X. Wang, H. Yan, P. Qin,et al., An anomalous hall effect in altermagnetic ruthenium dioxide, Nat. Electron. 5, 735 (2022)

    2022

  15. [24]

    T. Sato, S. Haddad, I. C. Fulga, F. F. Assaad, and J. van den Brink, Altermagnetic anomalous hall effect emerging from electronic correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 086503 (2024)

    2024

  16. [25]

    Attias, A

    L. Attias, A. Levchenko, and M. Khodas, Intrinsic anomalous hall effect in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 110, 094425 (2024)

    2024

  17. [26]

    S. Lee, S. Lee, S. Jung, J. Jung, D. Kim, Y. Lee, B. Seok, J. Kim, B. G. Park, L. ˇSmejkal, et al. , Broken kramers degeneracy in altermagnetic mnte, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 036702 (2024)

    2024

  18. [27]

    Krempask` y, L

    J. Krempask` y, L. ˇSmejkal, S. D’souza, M. Hajlaoui, G. Springholz, K. Uhl´ ıˇ rov´ a, F. Alarab, P. Constantinou, V. Strocov, D. Usanov, et al. , Altermagnetic lifting of kramers spin degeneracy, Nature 626, 517 (2024)

    2024

  19. [28]

    Reimers, L

    S. Reimers, L. Odenbreit, L. ˇSmejkal, V. N. Strocov, P. Constantinou, A. B. Hellenes, R. Jaeschke Ubiergo, W. H. Campos, V. K. Bharadwaj, A. Chakraborty, et al., Direct observation of altermagnetic band splitting in crsb thin films, Nat. Commun. 15, 2116 (2024)

    2024

  20. [29]

    S.-Y. Xu, Q. Ma, Y. Gao, A. Kogar, A. Zong, A. M. M. Valdivia, T. H. Dinh, S.-M. Huang, B. Singh, C.-H. Hsu, et al. , Spontaneous gyrotropic electronic order in a transition-metal dichalcogenide, Nature 578, 545 (2020)

    2020

  21. [30]

    H. Ueda, M. Porer, J. R. Mardegan, S. Parchenko, N. Gu- rung, F. Fabrizi, M. Ramakrishnan, L. Boie, M. J. Neuge- bauer, B. Burganov, et al. , Correlation between elec- tronic and structural orders in 1T -TiSe2, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, L022003 (2021)

    2021

  22. [31]

    A. J. Leggett, A theoretical description of the new phases of liquid 3He, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 331 (1975)

    1975

  23. [32]

    Z. Qian, Y. Yang, S. Liu, and C. Wu, Fragile uncon- ventional magnetism in RuO 2 by proximity to landau- pomeranchuk instability, arXiv:2501.13616 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  24. [33]

    Harter, Z

    J. Harter, Z. Zhao, J.-Q. Yan, D. Mandrus, and D. Hsieh, A parity-breaking electronic nematic phase transition in the spin-orbit coupled metal Cd2Re2O7, Science 356, 295 (2017)

    2017

  25. [34]

    Hiroi, J.-i

    Z. Hiroi, J.-i. Yamaura, T. C. Kobayashi, Y. Matsub- ayashi, and D. Hirai, Pyrochlore oxide superconduc- tor Cd 2Re2O7 revisited, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 87, 024702 (2018)

    2018

  26. [35]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, H. Kusunose, and Y. Motome, Electric toroidal quadrupoles in the spin-orbit-coupled metal Cd2Re2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 147602 (2019)

    2019

  27. [36]

    Fu, Parity-breaking phases of spin-orbit-coupled met- als with gyrotropic, ferroelectric, and multipolar orders, Phys

    L. Fu, Parity-breaking phases of spin-orbit-coupled met- als with gyrotropic, ferroelectric, and multipolar orders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 026401 (2015)

    2015

  28. [37]

    Jeong, Y

    J. Jeong, Y. Sidis, A. Louat, V. Brouet, and P. Bourges, Time-reversal symmetry breaking hidden order in Sr2(Ir,Rh)O4, Nat. Commun. 8, 1 (2017)

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.