Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 117 references

Evaluating Meta-Regression Techniques: A Simulation Study on Heterogeneity in Location and Time

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read When meta-regression data vary across both location and time, jointly modeling both dimensions outperforms modeling only one dimension.

desk verdict Useful simulation comparison with a new location-time trend specification, but the abstract overstates the results; worth peer review after revision. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.16696 v2 pith:URDF5M3O submitted 2025-04-23 econ.EM

Ali Habibnia , Jonathan Gendron This is my paper · ORCID
classification econ.EM
keywords meta-regressionsimulationstudylocationheterogeneitytimejointfixedeffectsrandommodelselection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether meta-regressions that pool studies from many countries and years should control for location and time heterogeneity explicitly, rather than only grouping by study. The authors simulate subject-level meta-regression data with location-specific intercepts and a common time trend, and compare the standard study-level random, fixed, and mixed effects models with seven specifications that add location and/or time controls. They find that when heterogeneity exists in both dimensions, jointly modeling it improves power, bias, and variance compared with modeling only one dimension; the standard methodology performs best overall, joint specifications finish a close second, and location-only or time-only specifications perform worst. The paper also introduces location-level fixed effects with a trend, which estimates the overall time trend accurately, unlike study-level fixed effects with a trend. If the finding holds outside the simulated design, practitioners should test for both dimensions and choose study-level or joint controls accordingly.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is a Monte Carlo simulation (10,000 iterations) whose data-generating process embeds location and time heterogeneity directly in the mean of the dependent variable: each location is assigned its own $\mu_Y$ intercept and each year adds 0.1 or 0.5 to $\mu_Y$, producing twelve cases that cross small/large location effects with small/large time effects and 5, 9, or 15 locations. Ten meta-regression specifications are estimated by inverse-variance weighted least squares, and performance is ranked by a fixed hierarchy: power first, then estimator bias, estimator variance, and confidence-interval precision. The newly introduced specification, location-level fixed effects with a trend (FEl,Trend), adds a rescaled trend polynomial $t_0 = \frac{2t - n - 1}{n - 1}$ to location dummies, which lets the model both control and measure a shared time trend; this is the object that carries the paper's positive recommendation.

What would settle it

Re-run the simulation with one location following a different time trend (or with randomly missing location-year cells) and compare the joint specifications against location-only and time-only controls; if the one-dimensional controls match or beat the joint specifications on bias and power, the paper's central decision rule fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that conventional meta-regression model selection is incomplete when studies differ in both place and time: the standard practice of grouping at the study level (random, fixed, or mixed effects) performs best overall, and methods that explicitly control both location and time perform a close second, while methods that control only location or only time perform worst under joint heterogeneity. In the simulation, location heterogeneity enters as fixed additive location-specific intercepts and time heterogeneity as a common linear trend scaled by 0.1 or 0.5 per year; all ten specifications estimate the covariate coefficients accurately, so the ranking is driven by statistical power, estimator variance, and trend accuracy. Study-level fixed effects with a trend are singled out as providing biased trend estimates, time-level fixed effects alone suffer from poor power, and the newly proposed location-level fixed effects with a trend gives near-best performance and accurate trend estimates. The authors therefore recommend REs, FEs, or the new FEl,Trend depending on whether the random effects assumption holds and whether the overall time effect is of interest.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that real meta-regression data looks like the simulated data: location differences are fixed intercepts, time differences are one shared linear trend, and every location contributes one study in every year with no missing cells; if real data have unbalanced panels or location-specific trends, the recommended ranking of methods could change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Practitioners pooling studies across countries and decades should test for location and time heterogeneity and prefer study-level models or joint controls (two-way fixed effects or location fixed effects with trend) over location-only or time-only controls.
  • Study-level fixed effects with a trend should not be used when the trend estimate matters, because it produced biased trend estimates in all simulated cases.
  • Time-level fixed effects alone are a poor default under joint heterogeneity, since they lost power even when time heterogeneity was large.
  • The new location-level fixed effects with trend specification is a viable alternative when the goal is to estimate the overall time effect while controlling for country differences.
  • A decision rule emerges: if the random effects assumption fails, use fixed effects; if an overall time effect is wanted, use location fixed effects with a trend; otherwise standard study-level models are safe.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper only simulates joint heterogeneity in both dimensions; its results do not show that location-level fixed effects fail when only location heterogeneity is present, and the authors list that as future work.
  • Because the simulated time trend is identical across locations, the recommended single global trend may misstate settings where countries follow different time paths; extending the simulation to location-specific trends would test that boundary.
  • A natural extension is to turn Section 7's parameter extraction into a routine check: for any real meta-regression with location-year cells, fit the ten specifications and confirm the ranking on synthetic data generated from that study's own means and covariances.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper uses a Monte Carlo simulation with subject-level data to compare ten meta-regression specifications: study-level random, fixed, and mixed effects; location-level random, fixed, and mixed effects; time-level fixed effects; two-way fixed effects; and study-level and location-level fixed effects with a trend. The simulation embeds location heterogeneity as an additive location-specific intercept and time heterogeneity as a common linear trend, with a perfectly balanced design of one study per location-year. Twelve cases vary the size of the location and time effects and the number of locations. The abstract claims that jointly modeling location and time heterogeneity improves performance relative to modeling only one dimension, and the paper recommends REs, FEs, or the newly proposed FEl,Trend for practitioners. The paper's own results, however, include conditions in which joint and non-joint specifications perform equally, and several load-bearing details (Type I error adjustment, trend rescaling, and numerical summaries) are not specified.

Significance. If the findings were established quantitatively, the paper would address a genuine gap: most meta-regression simulations consider only study-level heterogeneity, while applied meta-analyses often span many countries and years. The subject-level DGP with known true coefficients, the inclusion of a newly proposed location-level fixed-effects-with-trend specification (FEl,Trend), and the step-by-step model-selection guide are useful contributions. However, the strength of the contribution is conditional: the central ranking claim is not uniformly supported by the authors' own case-level results, and the absence of numeric Monte Carlo tables and the unspecified Type I error adjustment make it difficult to assess the magnitude and reliability of the reported differences. With the claims properly qualified and the missing details supplied, the paper could be a useful reference for applied meta-analysts.

major comments (5)
  1. [Abstract; Sections 5.3.1-5.3.3] The unqualified claim in the Abstract and in Section 1 that 'jointly modeling heterogeneity when heterogeneity is in both dimensions improves performance compared to modeling only one type of heterogeneity' is not a summary of this simulation. Section 5.3.2 reports that when the location effect is large, 'all methodology specifications performed just as well' (excluding FEt and FEs,Trend), and Section 5.3.3 reports that 'in the face of more locations non-joint methodology specifications performed just as well on average as joint methodology specifications.' The evidence presented supports the joint-over-single ranking mainly when the time effect is large (Section 5.3.1). The central claim should be revised to state these conditions explicitly and should not be formulated as a blanket decision rule for practitioners.
  2. [Section 5.1, Eq. (8)] The statement that the random-effects assumption is violated because 'each element of the covariance matrix is within [0.2,0.5], so the random effects assumption of 0 correlation is not designed to hold' is incorrect. The random-effects assumption requires zero correlation between the study-level random effect and the regressors, not zero covariance among the regressors themselves or between Y and X. Moreover, the DGP as described contains no study-level random component; studies differ only through the location and time intercepts. This error matters because the paper uses it to justify preferring fixed-effects over random/mixed specifications and to interpret the good performance of REs. The justification and the conclusions drawn from it need to be corrected.
  3. [Section 5.2.1] Statistical power is the first criterion in the performance hierarchy, yet the Type I error adjustment is not specified. The text says only that 'the Type I error was adjusted when the sample size of the simulated meta-regression was increased by either a larger sample size or more countries.' To make the reported power comparisons reproducible, the authors must state the adjustment formula or critical values used, the alpha levels in each of the twelve cases, and how the adjustment affects comparisons of specifications across cases with different sample sizes.
  4. [Section 5.3 and Appendices D/E] The results are presented only through selected figures and qualitative statements such as 'performed the best' and 'close second best'; Tables 5 and 6 summarize directions of change with arrows rather than numerical estimates. Without Monte Carlo tables reporting mean power, bias, variance, MSE, and confidence-interval coverage with simulation standard errors for all ten specifications across the twelve cases, the rankings cannot be verified or compared across conditions. I recommend adding such tables.
  5. [Section 4.4 and Section 5.3.1] The rescaled trend term is defined inconsistently. Section 4.4 defines n as the number of time periods, so with T=5 the trend values should always be [-1,-0.5,0,0.5,1], regardless of the number of locations. Section 5.3.1 instead reports different rescaled values for n=9 and n=15 locations, which is algebraically impossible under the stated formula. Because the judgment that FEs,Trend provides biased trend estimates depends on the actual trend coding, the authors should clarify the coding and verify that the results in Figure 9 are not an artifact of the rescaling.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 2, Cases 3 and 4] The nine-location small-effect vector is printed as {-2,-1.5,-1,0.5,0,0.5,1,1.5,2}; this contains 0.5 twice and omits -0.5, contradicting the text in Section 5.1. Please correct.
  2. [Section 5.3.1] The text uses n both for sample size (Table 1) and for the number of locations in the trend-rescaling discussion; this is confusing and should be made consistent (for example, using n_s, n_l, and T).
  3. [Section 6] The practitioners' guide recommends REs as one of three preferred specifications while also stating that random effects should not be used when the random-effects assumption does not hold; since the paper argues this assumption rarely holds, the recommendation needs a condition or clarification.
  4. [Code availability] The manuscript says 'Code availability: Github link' but no URL is given; a working link is necessary to verify the simulation and the trend coding.
  5. [Section 5.3.3] Because the number of locations and the number of studies are perfectly confounded in the design (L=5,9,15 gives 25,45,75 studies), the finding that performance improves with more locations cannot be separated from the sample-size effect; the text acknowledges this, but it should be stated as a design limitation rather than an independent result.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the simulation compares estimators against known DGP truth; headline overclaim is a reporting issue, not a circular derivation.

full rationale

This is a Monte Carlo simulation study, not a derivation with fitted inputs later relabeled as predictions. Each methodology is estimated on data generated from a known DGP and evaluated against the true coefficient values, so there is no fitting-then-prediction loop and no parameter is calibrated to the target conclusion. The DGP in Section 5.1 embeds location heterogeneity as fixed intercept shifts in mu_Y and time heterogeneity as a shared linear trend; models that include location and time controls (FElt, FEl,Trend) are therefore correctly specified for that DGP, but that is the intended experimental manipulation rather than a circular reduction. The paper's claims are about relative estimator performance (power, bias, variance, confidence-interval precision), and those criteria are not defined in terms of the method labels. The results are not forced by construction: the standard study-level models performed best overall, joint models only a close second, and under large location effects or more locations non-joint specifications performed just as well (Sections 5.3.2 and 5.3.3). The abstract's unqualified statement that joint modeling improves performance over single-dimension modeling is an overgeneralization relative to the paper's own case-level findings, but overclaiming is a reporting/calibration issue, not circularity. The paper also does not rely on load-bearing self-citation: prior work is cited for standard techniques such as trend-polynomial rescaling and is not used to justify the simulation's conclusions. The remaining concerns (unspecified Type I error adjustment, balanced-panel DGP, one study per location-year) are external-validity and reproducibility issues, not circular reasoning.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The simulation rests on a fully specified data-generating process whose parameters are chosen by hand. The main results depend on the chosen magnitudes of location and time effects, the balanced panel structure, and the normality assumption. No genuinely new theoretical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Time effect increment = 0.1 (small), 0.5 (large) per year
    Added to the mean of Y each year to simulate time heterogeneity; chosen by hand, not from data.
  • Location effect values = small sets like {-2,-1,0,1,2}; large sets like {-10,-5,0,5,10}
    Added as location-specific intercepts; chosen by hand to represent small versus large location heterogeneity.
  • Covariance entries = 0.2 to 0.5 off-diagonal
    Set in Section 5.1 to ensure covariates are statistically significant and, per the authors, to violate the random-effects assumption.
  • Type I error adjustment = not specified
    Power criterion is adjusted to combat the large-N problem, but the exact adjustment rule is not given (Section 5.2.1).
assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper The random-effects assumption is violated because the covariance matrix has nonzero off-diagonal elements.
    Section 5.1. The covariance between Y and X determines regression coefficients, not the correlation between study effects and covariates; since X is generated independently of location and time, the RE assumption actually holds in this DGP.
  • domain assumption Data are normally distributed and independent across observations (NIID).
    Section 5.1; the simulation and all estimators assume normality, and the authors acknowledge results may not generalize to non-Gaussian data.
  • domain assumption Each location has exactly one study per year for five years; balanced panel, no overlap, no missing data.
    Section 5.1; this balanced structure simplifies estimation and may not reflect real meta-analyses, as the authors acknowledge.
  • ad hoc to paper Time heterogeneity follows a linear deterministic trend shared by all locations; location heterogeneity is a fixed mean shift.
    This DGP makes the trend-based and two-way fixed-effects specifications correctly specified, so their good performance is partly built into the simulation design.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Evaluating Meta-Regression Techniques: A Simulation Study on Heterogeneity in Location and Time." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/URDF5M3O

@misc{pith2026250416696,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Evaluating Meta-Regression Techniques: A Simulation Study on Heterogeneity in Location and Time},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/URDF5M3O}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.16696}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we conduct a simulation study with subject-level data to evaluate conventional meta-regression approaches (study-level random, fixed, and mixed effects) against seven methodology specifications new to meta-regressions that control joint heterogeneity in location and time (including a new one that we introduce). We systematically vary heterogeneity levels to assess statistical power, estimator bias and model robustness for each methodology specification. This assessment focuses on three aspects: performance under joint heterogeneity in location and time, the effectiveness of our proposed settings incorporating location fixed effects and study-level fixed effects with a time trend, as well as guidelines for model selection. The results show that jointly modeling heterogeneity when heterogeneity is in both dimensions improves performance compared to modeling only one type of heterogeneity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.16696 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flowchart of the Simulation: This flowchart shows detailed steps of how the simulation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Basic Model Selection Decision Framework: This decision tree shows the basic algo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Study-level Variable Distributions: Each plot illustrates the distribution of each vari [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (16 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Sample Power Curves: These illustrate the difference of when there are one versus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Sample Trend Estimates: These illustrate the difference between when there is one [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Sample X1 Bias & Variance Distributions: The estimators bias and variance and MSE [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Sample X1 Bias & Variance Distributions: The estimators bias and variance are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Sample Power Curves: These illustrate a small versus large time effect (respectively [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Sample Trend Estimates: These illustrate the difference between when there is a small [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Sample X1 Bias & Variance Distributions: The estimators bias and variance are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Sample X1 Bias & Variance Distributions: The estimators bias and variance are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p044_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Sample Power Curves: These illustrate a small versus large location effect (respec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p045_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Sample Trend Estimates: These illustrate the difference between when there is a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p045_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Sample X1 Bias & Variance Distributions: The estimators bias and variance are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Sample X1 Bias & Variance Distributions: The estimators bias and variance are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Sample Power Curves: These illustrate less versus more locations (respectively cor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Sample Trend Estimates: These illustrate less versus more locations (respectively [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Sample X1 Bias & Variance Distributions: The estimators bias and variance are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p049_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Sample X1 Bias & Variance Distributions: The estimators bias and variance are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p050_19.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

117 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline " cite write " FUNCTION editor.postfix editor num.names #1 > "( )" "( )" if FUNCTION editor.trans.postfix editor num.names #1 > "( )" "( )" if FUNCTION trans.postfix translator num.names #1 > "( )" "( )" if FUNCTION authors.editors.reflist.apa5 'field := 'dot := field num.names 'numnames := numnames 'format.num.names := format.num.names na...

  2. [2]

    , Nosenzo, D

    abeler2019 APACrefauthors Abeler, J. , Nosenzo, D. \ Raymond, C. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Preferences for Truth ‐ Telling Preferences for Truth ‐ Telling . Econometrica 87 4 1115--1153 . APACrefURL [ 2023-11-28 ]https://www.econometricsociety.org/doi/10.3982/ECTA14673 APACrefURL doi:10.3982/ECTA14673

    work page doi:10.3982/ecta14673 2019

  3. [3]

    \ Demena, B A

    afesorgbor22 APACrefauthors Afesorgbor, S K. \ Demena, B A. APACrefauthors \ 2022 02 . Trade Openness and Environmental Emissions : Evidence from a Meta - Analysis Trade Openness and Environmental Emissions : Evidence from a Meta - Analysis . Environmental and Resource Economics 81 2 287--321 . APACrefURL [ 2025-01-02 ]https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s1...

    work page doi:10.1007/s10640-021-00627-0 2022

  4. [4]

    , Ball, S

    aimone_macro-level_2023 APACrefauthors Aimone, J. , Ball, S. , Dwibedi, E. , Jeremy, J. \ West, J. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Macro- Level Institutions and Micro - Level Economic Behavior : A Meta - Meta Analysis of 1,126 Studies Macro- Level Institutions and Micro - Level Economic Behavior : A Meta - Meta Analysis of 1,126 Studies . NBER Working Paper No. 3...

    2024

  5. [5]

    APACrefauthors \ 1974 12

    akaike APACrefauthors Akaike, H. APACrefauthors \ 1974 12 . A new look at the statistical model identification A new look at the statistical model identification . IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19 6 716--723 . APACrefURL [ 2024-08-12 ]http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1100705/ APACrefURL doi:10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705

    arXiv 1974

  6. [6]

    \ Malézieux, A

    alm APACrefauthors Alm, J. \ Malézieux, A. APACrefauthors \ 2021 09 . 40 years of tax evasion games: a meta-analysis 40 years of tax evasion games: a meta-analysis . Experimental Economics 24 3 699--750 . APACrefURL [ 2024-07-22 ]https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10683-020-09679-3 APACrefURL doi:10.1007/s10683-020-09679-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s10683-020-09679-3 2021

  7. [7]

    \ Kulinskaya, E

    kulin18 APACrefauthors Bakbergenuly, I. \ Kulinskaya, E. APACrefauthors \ 2018 12 . Meta-analysis of binary outcomes via generalized linear mixed models: a simulation study Meta-analysis of binary outcomes via generalized linear mixed models: a simulation study . BMC Medical Research Methodology 18 1 70 . APACrefURL [ 2024-06-06 ]https://bmcmedresmethodol...

    work page doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0531-9 2018

  8. [8]

    APACrefauthors \ 2005

    baltagi2005 APACrefauthors Baltagi, B H. APACrefauthors \ 2005 . Econometric analysis of panel data Econometric analysis of panel data \ ( 3. ed \ ). Chichester Wiley

    2005

Show all 117 references
  1. [9]

    \ Enders, C K

    enders10 APACrefauthors Baraldi, A N. \ Enders, C K. APACrefauthors \ 2010 02 . An introduction to modern missing data analyses An introduction to modern missing data analyses . Journal of School Psychology 48 1 5--37 . APACrefURL [ 2024-11-10 ]https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/...

    2010 doi

  2. [10]

    , Spanos, A

    spanos2010 APACrefauthors Bergtold, J S. , Spanos, A. \ Onukwugha, E. APACrefauthors \ 2010 . Bernoulli Regression Models : Revisiting the Specification of Statistical Models with Binary Dependent Variables Bernoulli Regression Models : Revisiting the Specification of Statisti...

    2010 doi

  3. [11]

    \ Tweedie, R L

    tweedie97 APACrefauthors Biggerstaff, B J. \ Tweedie, R L. APACrefauthors \ 1997 04 . INCORPORATING VARIABILITY IN ESTIMATES OF HETEROGENEITY IN THE RANDOM EFFECTS MODEL IN META - ANALYSIS INCORPORATING VARIABILITY IN ESTIMATES OF HETEROGENEITY IN THE RANDOM EFFECTS MODEL IN M...

    1997 doi

  4. [12]

    , Dreber, A

    bilen_are_2021 APACrefauthors Bilén, D. , Dreber, A. \ Johannesson, M. APACrefauthors \ 2021 09 . Are women more generous than men? A meta-analysis Are women more generous than men? A meta-analysis . Journal of the Economic Science Association 7 1 1--18 . APACrefURL [ 2023-09-...

    2021 doi

  5. [13]

    , Sánchez-Meca, J

    botella23 APACrefauthors Blázquez-Rincón, D. , Sánchez-Meca, J. , Botella, J. \ Suero, M. APACrefauthors \ 2023 01 . Heterogeneity estimation in meta-analysis of standardized mean differences when the distribution of random effects departs from normal: A Monte Carlo simulation...

    2023

  6. [14]

    APACrefauthors \ 2007 05

    bohnet2007 APACrefauthors Bohnet, I. APACrefauthors \ 2007 05 . Why Women and Men Trust Others Why Women and Men Trust Others . B S. Frey\ A. Stutzer\ ( ), Economics and Psychology Economics and Psychology \ ( \ 89--110). The MIT Press . APACrefURL [ 2024-03-22 ]https://direct...

    2007 doi

  7. [15]

    font-variant:small-caps

    bom20 APACrefauthors Bom, P R D. \ Rachinger, H. APACrefauthors \ 2020 11 . A span style="font-variant:small-caps;" generalized‐weights /span solution to sample overlap in span style="font-variant:small-caps;" meta‐analysis /span A span style="font-variant:small-caps;" general...

    2020 doi

  8. [16]

    , Hedges, L

    borenstein APACrefauthors Borenstein, M. , Hedges, L. , Higgins, J. \ Rothstein, H. APACrefauthors \ 2009 . Introduction to meta-analysis Introduction to meta-analysis . Chichester, U.K John Wiley & Sons . OCLC: ocn263294996

    2009

  9. [17]

    \ Gordon, I R

    gordon01 APACrefauthors Brockwell, S E. \ Gordon, I R. APACrefauthors \ 2001 03 . A comparison of statistical methods for meta‐analysis A comparison of statistical methods for meta‐analysis . Statistics in Medicine 20 6 825--840 . APACrefURL [ 2024-06-06 ]https://onlinelibrary...

    2001 doi

  10. [18]

    , Bussiere, M

    goldberg18 APACrefauthors Buch, C M. , Bussiere, M. , Goldberg, L. \ Hills, R. APACrefauthors \ 2018 March . The International Transmission of Monetary Policy The international transmission of monetary policy \ Working Paper\ \ 24454 . National Bureau of Economic Research . AP...

    2018 doi

  11. [19]

    APACrefauthors \ 2018

    buuren18 APACrefauthors Buuren, S v. APACrefauthors \ 2018 . Flexible imputation of missing data Flexible imputation of missing data \ ( Second edition \ ). Boca Raton CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group

    2018

  12. [20]

    \ Trivedi, P K

    cameron2005 APACrefauthors Cameron, A C. \ Trivedi, P K. APACrefauthors \ 2005 . Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications \ ( 13th printing \ ). Cambridge Cambridge University Press

    2005

  13. [21]

    \ Linzer, D A

    clark15 APACrefauthors Clark, T S. \ Linzer, D A. APACrefauthors \ 2015 05 . Should I Use Fixed or Random Effects ? Should I Use Fixed or Random Effects ? Political Science Research and Methods 3 2 399--408 . APACrefURL [ 2024-11-10 ]https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/iden...

    2015 doi

  14. [22]

    \ Patall, E A

    cooper_relative_2009 APACrefauthors Cooper, H. \ Patall, E A. APACrefauthors \ 2009 . The relative benefits of meta-analysis conducted with individual participant data versus aggregated data. The relative benefits of meta-analysis conducted with individual participant data ver...

    2009 doi

  15. [23]

    \ Ta, T D N

    ta20 APACrefauthors Dao, B T T. \ Ta, T D N. APACrefauthors \ 2020 04 . A meta-analysis: capital structure and firm performance A meta-analysis: capital structure and firm performance . Journal of Economics and Development 22 1 111--129 . APACrefURL [ 2024-10-15 ]https://www.e...

    2020 doi

  16. [24]

    \ Lopez, J A

    diebold96 APACrefauthors Diebold, F X. \ Lopez, J A. APACrefauthors \ 1996 . 8 Forecast evaluation and combination 8 Forecast evaluation and combination . Handbook of Statistics Handbook of Statistics \ ( 14, \ 241--268). Elsevier . APACrefURL [ 2025-01-11 ]https://linkinghub....

    1996 doi

  17. [25]

    \ Rice, K M

    riceIslas2018 APACrefauthors Domínguez Islas, C. \ Rice, K M. APACrefauthors \ 2018 05 . Addressing the estimation of standard errors in fixed effects meta‐analysis Addressing the estimation of standard errors in fixed effects meta‐analysis . Statistics in Medicine 37 11 1788-...

    2018 doi

  18. [26]

    APACrefauthors \ 2023

    dorazio APACrefauthors D'Orazio, B. APACrefauthors \ 2023 . \ Macroeconomic Forecasting : Statistically Adequate , Temporal Principal Components Macroeconomic Forecasting : Statistically Adequate , Temporal Principal Components \ Virginia Tech . \ APACrefURL http://hdl.handle....

    2023

  19. [27]

    , Guthier, C

    dormann20 APACrefauthors Dormann, C. , Guthier, C. \ Cortina, J M. APACrefauthors \ 2020 10 . Introducing Continuous Time Meta - Analysis ( CoTiMA ) Introducing Continuous Time Meta - Analysis ( CoTiMA ) . Organizational Research Methods 23 4 620--650 . APACrefURL [ 2024-06-06...

    2020 doi

  20. [28]

    APACrefauthors \ 2011 11

    engel2011 APACrefauthors Engel, C. APACrefauthors \ 2011 11 . Dictator games: a meta study Dictator games: a meta study . Experimental Economics 14 4 583--610 . APACrefURL [ 2024-03-03 ]http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10683-011-9283-7 APACrefURL doi:10.1007/s10683-011-9283-7

    2011 doi

  21. [29]

    \ Tracy, J D

    tracy APACrefauthors Ferraro, P J. \ Tracy, J D. APACrefauthors \ 2022 11 . A reassessment of the potential for loss-framed incentive contracts to increase productivity: a meta-analysis and a real-effort experiment A reassessment of the potential for loss-framed incentive cont...

    2022 doi

  22. [30]

    \ Suetens, S

    fiala APACrefauthors Fiala, L. \ Suetens, S. APACrefauthors \ 2017 12 . Transparency and cooperation in repeated dilemma games: a meta study Transparency and cooperation in repeated dilemma games: a meta study . Experimental Economics 20 4 755--771 . APACrefURL [ 2024-03-03 ]h...

    2017 doi

  23. [31]

    APACrefauthors \ 2001

    field01 APACrefauthors Field, A P. APACrefauthors \ 2001 . Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: A Monte Carlo comparison of fixed- and random-effects methods. Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: A Monte Carlo comparison of fixed- and random-effects methods. Psycho...

    2001 doi

  24. [32]

    , Schwert, G

    french87 APACrefauthors French, K R. , Schwert, G. \ Stambaugh, R F. APACrefauthors \ 1987 09 . Expected stock returns and volatility Expected stock returns and volatility . Journal of Financial Economics 19 1 3--29 . APACrefURL [ 2025-01-10 ]https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/re...

    1987

  25. [33]

    , Nosenzo, D

    owens APACrefauthors Fromell, H. , Nosenzo, D. \ Owens, T. APACrefauthors \ 2020 12 . Altruism, fast and slow? Evidence from a meta-analysis and a new experiment Altruism, fast and slow? Evidence from a meta-analysis and a new experiment . Experimental Economics 23 4 979--1001...

    2020 doi

  26. [34]

    \ Altoè, G

    altoe24 APACrefauthors Gambarota, F. \ Altoè, G. APACrefauthors \ 2024 01 . Understanding Meta - Analysis Through Data Simulation With Applications to Power Analysis Understanding Meta - Analysis Through Data Simulation With Applications to Power Analysis . Advances in Methods...

    2024 doi

  27. [35]

    APACrefauthors \ 2011 06

    gneiting11 APACrefauthors Gneiting, T. APACrefauthors \ 2011 06 . Making and Evaluating Point Forecasts Making and Evaluating Point Forecasts . Journal of the American Statistical Association 106 494 746--762 . APACrefURL [ 2025-01-11 ]http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.119...

    2011 doi

  28. [36]

    APACrefauthors \ 2009 01

    graham09 APACrefauthors Graham, J W. APACrefauthors \ 2009 01 . Missing Data Analysis : Making It Work in the Real World Missing Data Analysis : Making It Work in the Real World . Annual Review of Psychology 60 1 549--576 . APACrefURL [ 2024-11-10 ]https://www.annualreviews.or...

    2009

  29. [37]

    APACrefauthors \ 2018

    greene18 APACrefauthors Greene, W. APACrefauthors \ 2018 . Econometric analysis Econometric analysis \ ( Eighth edition \ ). New York, NY Pearson

    2018

  30. [38]

    guo23 APACrefauthors Guo, F. , He, S. \ Lin, Z. APACrefauthors \ 2023 04 . Truths and Myths About the Finance - Growth Nexus in China : A Meta - Analysis Truths and Myths About the Finance - Growth Nexus in China : A Meta - Analysis . Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 59 5 14...

    2023

  31. [39]

    , Röver, C

    gunhan20 APACrefauthors Günhan, B K. , Röver, C. \ Friede, T. APACrefauthors \ 2020 01 . Random‐effects meta‐analysis of few studies involving rare events Random‐effects meta‐analysis of few studies involving rare events . Research Synthesis Methods 11 1 74--90 . APACrefURL [ ...

    2020 doi

  32. [40]

    \ Taylor, W E

    hausman81 APACrefauthors Hausman, J A. \ Taylor, W E. APACrefauthors \ 1981 11 . Panel Data and Unobservable Individual Effects Panel Data and Unobservable Individual Effects . Econometrica 49 6 1377 . APACrefURL [ 2024-11-10 ]https://www.jstor.org/stable/1911406?origin=crossr...

    1981

  33. [41]

    \ Vevea, J L

    hedges98 APACrefauthors Hedges, L V. \ Vevea, J L. APACrefauthors \ 1998 12 . Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods 3 4 486--504 . APACrefURL [ 2024-06-06 ]https://doi.apa.org/doi/10.1037/108...

    1998 doi

  34. [42]

    \ Johnson, B T

    johnson20 APACrefauthors Hennessy, E A. \ Johnson, B T. APACrefauthors \ 2020 01 . Examining overlap of included studies in meta‐reviews: Guidance for using the corrected covered area index Examining overlap of included studies in meta‐reviews: Guidance for using the corrected...

    2020 doi

  35. [43]

    , Thompson, S G

    higgins_re-evaluation_2009 APACrefauthors Higgins, J P T. , Thompson, S G. \ Spiegelhalter, D J. APACrefauthors \ 2009 01 . A Re - Evaluation of Random - Effects Meta - Analysis A Re - Evaluation of Random - Effects Meta - Analysis . Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Se...

    2009 arXiv

  36. [44]

    \ Schmidt, F L

    hunter_fixed_2000 APACrefauthors Hunter, J E. \ Schmidt, F L. APACrefauthors \ 2000 12 . Fixed Effects vs. Random Effects Meta ‐ Analysis Models : Implications for Cumulative Research Knowledge Fixed Effects vs. Random Effects Meta ‐ Analysis Models : Implications for Cumulati...

    2000

  37. [45]

    \ Athanasopoulos, G

    hyndman21 APACrefauthors Hyndman, R J. \ Athanasopoulos, G. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . Forecasting: principles and practice Forecasting: principles and practice \ ( Third print edition \ ). Melbourne, Australia Otexts, Online Open-Access Textbooks

    2021

  38. [46]

    jiang24 APACrefauthors Jiang, C. , Li, S. , Cai, D. , Ye, J. , Bao, Q. , Liu, C. \ Wang, S. APACrefauthors \ 2024 12 . ChatGPT -based meta-analysis for evaluating the temporal and spatial characteristics of deoxynivalenol contamination in Chinese wheat ChatGPT -based meta-anal...

    2024

  39. [47]

    , Cromley, E K

    johnson_st_17 APACrefauthors Johnson, B T. , Cromley, E K. \ Marrouch, N. APACrefauthors \ 2017 07 . Spatiotemporal meta-analysis: reviewing health psychology phenomena over space and time Spatiotemporal meta-analysis: reviewing health psychology phenomena over space and time ...

    2017

  40. [48]

    \ Mislin, A A

    johnson_trust_2011 APACrefauthors Johnson, N D. \ Mislin, A A. APACrefauthors \ 2011 10 . Trust games: A meta-analysis Trust games: A meta-analysis . Journal of Economic Psychology 32 5 865--889 . APACrefURL [ 2023-11-13 ]https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S016748701...

    2011 doi

  41. [49]

    APACrefauthors \ 2012

    kelley_statistical_2012 APACrefauthors Kelley, G A. APACrefauthors \ 2012 . Statistical models for meta-analysis: A brief tutorial Statistical models for meta-analysis: A brief tutorial . World Journal of Methodology 2 4 27 . APACrefURL [ 2023-10-05 ]http://www.wjgnet.com/2222...

    2012 doi

  42. [50]

    , Hoaglin, D C

    kulin21 APACrefauthors Kulinskaya, E. , Hoaglin, D C. \ Bakbergenuly, I. APACrefauthors \ 2021 07 . Exploring consequences of simulation design for apparent performance of methods of meta-analysis Exploring consequences of simulation design for apparent performance of methods ...

    2021 doi

  43. [51]

    , Sutton, A

    lambert02 APACrefauthors Lambert, P. , Sutton, A. , Abrams, K. \ Jones, D. APACrefauthors \ 2002 01 . A comparison of summary patient-level covariates in meta-regression with individual patient data meta-analysis A comparison of summary patient-level covariates in meta-regress...

    2002 doi

  44. [52]

    APACrefauthors \ 2016 11

    lane APACrefauthors Lane, T. APACrefauthors \ 2016 11 . Discrimination in the laboratory: A meta-analysis of economics experiments Discrimination in the laboratory: A meta-analysis of economics experiments . Social identity and discrimination 90 375--402 . APACrefURL https://w...

    2016 doi

  45. [53]

    , Higgins, J P

    langan18 APACrefauthors Langan, D. , Higgins, J P. , Jackson, D. , Bowden, J. , Veroniki, A A. , Kontopantelis, E. Simmonds, M. APACrefauthors \ 2019 03 . A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random‐effects meta‐analyses A comparison of heterogeneity ...

    2019 doi

  46. [54]

    , Song, Y A

    lebeau18 APACrefauthors LeBeau, B. , Song, Y A. \ Liu, W C. APACrefauthors \ 2018 10 . Model Misspecification and Assumption Violations With the Linear Mixed Model : A Meta - Analysis Model Misspecification and Assumption Violations With the Linear Mixed Model : A Meta - Analy...

    2018 doi

  47. [55]

    \ Banks, D

    banks23 APACrefauthors LeBlanc, P M. \ Banks, D. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . Time-varying Bayesian Network Meta - Analysis . Time-varying Bayesian Network Meta - Analysis . arXiv . APACrefURL [ 2024-06-06 ]https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.08312 APACrefURL Version Number: 2 doi:10.48550/...

    2022 doi arXiv

  48. [56]

    , Cook, S

    lee_comparison_2016 APACrefauthors Lee, C H. , Cook, S. , Lee, J S. \ Han, B. APACrefauthors \ 2016 . Comparison of Two Meta - Analysis Methods : Inverse - Variance - Weighted Average and Weighted Sum of Z - Scores Comparison of Two Meta - Analysis Methods : Inverse - Variance...

    2016 doi

  49. [57]

    \ Beretvas, S N

    lee23 APACrefauthors Lee, J. \ Beretvas, S N. APACrefauthors \ 2023 01 . Comparing methods for handling missing covariates in meta‐regression Comparing methods for handling missing covariates in meta‐regression . Research Synthesis Methods 14 1 117--136 . APACrefURL [ 2024-11-...

    2023 doi

  50. [58]

    \ Romano, J

    lehmann05 APACrefauthors Lehmann, E. \ Romano, J. APACrefauthors \ 2005 . Testing Statistical Hypotheses Testing Statistical Hypotheses . New York, NY Springer New York . APACrefURL [ 2024-10-14 ]http://link.springer.com/10.1007/0-387-27605-X APACrefURL ISSN: 1431-875X doi:10....

    2005 doi

  51. [59]

    \ Sullivan, P F

    lin09 APACrefauthors Lin, D Y. \ Sullivan, P F. APACrefauthors \ 2009 12 . Meta- Analysis of Genome -wide Association Studies with Overlapping Subjects Meta- Analysis of Genome -wide Association Studies with Overlapping Subjects . The American Journal of Human Genetics 85 6 86...

    2009 doi

  52. [60]

    \ Rubin, D

    rubin19 APACrefauthors Little, R. \ Rubin, D. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Statistical Analysis with Missing Data , Third Edition Statistical Analysis with Missing Data , Third Edition \ ( 1 \ ). Wiley . APACrefURL [ 2024-11-10 ]https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781...

    2019 doi

  53. [61]

    \ Xiao, W

    liu22 APACrefauthors Liu, T. \ Xiao, W. APACrefauthors \ 2022 10 . The ‘intention to stay’ of the floating migrant population: A spatiotemporal meta‐analysis in Chinese cities The ‘intention to stay’ of the floating migrant population: A spatiotemporal meta‐analysis in Chinese...

    2022 doi

  54. [62]

    \ Van Beek, E

    water17 APACrefauthors Loucks, D P. \ Van Beek, E. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . An Introduction to Probability, Statistics, and Uncertainty An introduction to probability, statistics, and uncertainty . Water Resource Systems Planning and Management Water resource systems planning a...

    2017 doi

  55. [63]

    , Marín‐Martínez, F

    viech14 APACrefauthors López‐López, J A. , Marín‐Martínez, F. , Sánchez‐Meca, J. , Van Den Noortgate, W. \ Viechtbauer, W. APACrefauthors \ 2014 02 . Estimation of the predictive power of the model in mixed‐effects meta‐regression: A simulation study Estimation of the predicti...

    2014

  56. [64]

    , Martin, R D

    maronna19 APACrefauthors Maronna, R A. , Martin, R D. , Yohai, V J. \ Salibián-Barrera, M. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Robust statistics: theory and methods (with R ) Robust statistics: theory and methods (with R ) . Second edition Wiley

    2019

  57. [65]

    , Havranek, T

    irsova APACrefauthors Matousek, J. , Havranek, T. \ Irsova, Z. APACrefauthors \ 2022 02 . Individual discount rates: a meta-analysis of experimental evidence Individual discount rates: a meta-analysis of experimental evidence . Experimental Economics 25 1 318--358 . APACrefURL...

    2022 doi

  58. [66]

    , Katzenschlager, S

    mcgrath23 APACrefauthors McGrath, S. , Katzenschlager, S. , Zimmer, A J. , Seitel, A. , Steele, R. \ Benedetti, A. APACrefauthors \ 2023 02 . Standard error estimation in meta-analysis of studies reporting medians Standard error estimation in meta-analysis of studies reporting...

    2023 doi

  59. [67]

    , Zhao, X

    mcgrath19 APACrefauthors McGrath, S. , Zhao, X. , Qin, Z Z. , Steele, R. \ Benedetti, A. APACrefauthors \ 2019 03 . One‐sample aggregate data meta‐analysis of medians One‐sample aggregate data meta‐analysis of medians . Statistics in Medicine 38 6 969--984 . APACrefURL [ 2024-...

    2019 doi

  60. [68]

    APACrefauthors \ 2018 12

    mengel APACrefauthors Mengel, F. APACrefauthors \ 2018 12 . Risk and Temptation : A Meta ‐study on Prisoner 's Dilemma Games Risk and Temptation : A Meta ‐study on Prisoner 's Dilemma Games . The Economic Journal 128 616 3182--3209 . APACrefURL [ 2024-03-03 ]https://academic.o...

    2018 doi

  61. [69]

    \ Spanos, A

    spanos2020 APACrefauthors Michaelides, M. \ Spanos, A. APACrefauthors \ 2020 02 . On modeling heterogeneity in linear models using trend polynomials On modeling heterogeneity in linear models using trend polynomials . Economic Modelling 85 74--86 . APACrefURL [ 2024-06-21 ]htt...

    2020 doi

  62. [70]

    APACrefauthors \ 1978 01

    mundlak78 APACrefauthors Mundlak, Y. APACrefauthors \ 1978 01 . On the Pooling of Time Series and Cross Section Data On the Pooling of Time Series and Cross Section Data . Econometrica 46 1 69 . APACrefURL [ 2024-11-10 ]https://www.jstor.org/stable/1913646?origin=crossref APAC...

    1978

  63. [71]

    \ Murphy, K R

    myors23 APACrefauthors Myors, B. \ Murphy, K R. APACrefauthors \ 2023 . Statistical Power Analysis : A Simple and General Model for Traditional and Modern Hypothesis Tests , Fifth Edition Statistical Power Analysis : A Simple and General Model for Traditional and Modern Hypoth...

    2023

  64. [72]

    \ Guido, S

    muller17 APACrefauthors Müller, A C. \ Guido, S. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . Introduction to machine learning with Python : a guide for data scientists Introduction to machine learning with Python : a guide for data scientists \ ( First edition \ ). Sebastopol, CA O'Reilly Media

    2017

  65. [73]

    \ Kennedy, P E

    nelson09 APACrefauthors Nelson, J P. \ Kennedy, P E. APACrefauthors \ 2009 03 . The Use (and Abuse ) of Meta - Analysis in Environmental and Natural Resource Economics : An Assessment The Use (and Abuse ) of Meta - Analysis in Environmental and Natural Resource Economics : An ...

    2009 doi

  66. [74]

    , Nagashima, K

    noma2019 APACrefauthors Noma, H. , Nagashima, K. \ Furukawa, T A. APACrefauthors \ 2020 03 . Permutation inference methods for multivariate meta‐analysis Permutation inference methods for multivariate meta‐analysis . Biometrics 76 1 337--347 . APACrefURL [ 2024-10-02 ]https://...

    2020 doi

  67. [75]

    , Sloof, R

    oosterbeek APACrefauthors Oosterbeek, H. , Sloof, R. \ Van De Kuilen, G. APACrefauthors \ 2004 06 . Cultural Differences in Ultimatum Game Experiments : Evidence from a Meta - Analysis Cultural Differences in Ultimatum Game Experiments : Evidence from a Meta - Analysis . Exper...

    2004

  68. [76]

    APACrefauthors \ 1998 09

    overton98 APACrefauthors Overton, R C. APACrefauthors \ 1998 09 . A comparison of fixed-effects and mixed (random-effects) models for meta-analysis tests of moderator variable effects. A comparison of fixed-effects and mixed (random-effects) models for meta-analysis tests of m...

    1998 doi

  69. [77]

    , Stijnen, T

    stijnen19 APACrefauthors Papadimitropoulou, K. , Stijnen, T. , Dekkers, O M. \ Le Cessie, S. APACrefauthors \ 2019 09 . One‐stage random effects meta‐analysis using linear mixed models for aggregate continuous outcome data One‐stage random effects meta‐analysis using linear mi...

    2019 doi

  70. [78]

    , Nikolakopoulos, S

    pateras18 APACrefauthors Pateras, K. , Nikolakopoulos, S. \ Roes, K. APACrefauthors \ 2018 03 . Data‐generating models of dichotomous outcomes: Heterogeneity in simulation studies for a random‐effects meta‐analysis Data‐generating models of dichotomous outcomes: Heterogeneity ...

    2018 doi

  71. [79]

    , Patsopoulos, N A

    aert10 APACrefauthors Pereira, T V. , Patsopoulos, N A. , Salanti, G. \ Ioannidis, J P A. APACrefauthors \ 2010 04 . Critical interpretation of Cochran 's Q test depends on power and prior assumptions about heterogeneity Critical interpretation of Cochran 's Q test depends on ...

    2010 doi

  72. [80]

    \ Af Wåhlberg, A

    poom22 APACrefauthors Poom, L. \ Af Wåhlberg, A. APACrefauthors \ 2022 07 . Accuracy of conversion formula for effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation Accuracy of conversion formula for effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation . Research Synthesis Methods 13 4 508--519 . APACrefU...

    2022 doi

  73. [81]

    \ Spanos, A

    poudyal_model_2022 APACrefauthors Poudyal, N. \ Spanos, A. APACrefauthors \ 2022 04 . Model Validation and DSGE Modeling Model Validation and DSGE Modeling . Econometrics 10 2 17 . APACrefURL [ 2024-02-14 ]https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1146/10/2/17 APACrefURL doi:10.3390/econometr...

    2022 doi

  74. [82]

    , Song, C

    ren22 APACrefauthors Ren, S. , Song, C. , Ye, S. , Cheng, C. \ Gao, P. APACrefauthors \ 2022 02 . The spatiotemporal variation in heavy metals in China 's farmland soil over the past 20 years: A meta-analysis The spatiotemporal variation in heavy metals in China 's farmland so...

    2022

  75. [83]

    , Higgins, J P T

    rice_re-evaluation_2018 APACrefauthors Rice, K. , Higgins, J P T. \ Lumley, T. APACrefauthors \ 2018 01 . A Re - Evaluation of Fixed Effect (s) Meta - Analysis A Re - Evaluation of Fixed Effect (s) Meta - Analysis . Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics...

    2018 doi

  76. [84]

    , Cole, S R

    richardson21 APACrefauthors Richardson, D B. , Cole, S R. , Ross, R K. , Poole, C. , Chu, H. \ Keil, A P. APACrefauthors \ 2021 02 . Meta- Analysis and Sparse - Data Bias Meta- Analysis and Sparse - Data Bias . American Journal of Epidemiology 190 2 336--340 . APACrefURL [ 202...

    2021 doi

  77. [85]

    , Williams, D R

    burkner23 APACrefauthors Rodriguez, J E. , Williams, D R. \ Bürkner, P. APACrefauthors \ 2023 05 . Heterogeneous heterogeneity by default: Testing categorical moderators in mixed‐effects meta‐analysis Heterogeneous heterogeneity by default: Testing categorical moderators in mi...

    2023 doi

  78. [86]

    , López‐López, J A

    rubio18 APACrefauthors Rubio‐Aparicio, M. , López‐López, J A. , Sánchez‐Meca, J. , Marín‐Martínez, F. , Viechtbauer, W. \ Van Den Noortgate, W. APACrefauthors \ 2018 09 . Estimation of an overall standardized mean difference in random‐effects meta‐analysis if the distribution ...

    2018

  79. [87]

    , Costanza, D P

    rudolph20 APACrefauthors Rudolph, C W. , Costanza, D P. , Wright, C. \ Zacher, H. APACrefauthors \ 2020 12 . Cross- Temporal Meta - Analysis : A Conceptual and Empirical Critique Cross- Temporal Meta - Analysis : A Conceptual and Empirical Critique . Journal of Business and Ps...

    2020 doi

  80. [88]

    , Rücker, G

    schwarzer24 APACrefauthors Schwarzer, G. , Rücker, G. \ Semaca, C. APACrefauthors \ 2024 03 . LFK index does not reliably detect small‐study effects in meta‐analysis: A simulation study LFK index does not reliably detect small‐study effects in meta‐analysis: A simulation study...

    2024 doi

  81. [89]

    \ Lee, A J

    seber03 APACrefauthors Seber, G A F. \ Lee, A J. APACrefauthors \ 2003 . Linear regression analysis Linear regression analysis \ ( Second edition \ ). Hoboken, N.J Wiley-Interscience . doi:10.1002/9780471722199

    2003 doi

  82. [90]

    APACrefauthors \ 2010 10

    spanosAIC2010 APACrefauthors Spanos, A. APACrefauthors \ 2010 10 . Akaike-type criteria and the reliability of inference: Model selection versus statistical model specification Akaike-type criteria and the reliability of inference: Model selection versus statistical model spec...

    2010 doi

  83. [91]

    APACrefauthors \ 2019 1 11

    spanos2019b APACrefauthors Spanos, A. APACrefauthors \ 2019 1 11 . Near-collinearity in linear regression revisited: The numerical vs. the statistical perspective Near-collinearity in linear regression revisited: The numerical vs. the statistical perspective . Communications i...

    2019

  84. [92]

    APACrefauthors \ 2019 2

    spanos2019 APACrefauthors Spanos, A. APACrefauthors \ 2019 2 . Probability Theory and Statistical Inference : Empirical Modeling with Observational Data Probability Theory and Statistical Inference : Empirical Modeling with Observational Data \ ( 2 \ ). Cambridge University Pr...

    2019

  85. [93]

    APACrefauthors \ 2023 12

    spanos2024 APACrefauthors Spanos, A. APACrefauthors \ 2023 12 . Revisiting the Large n ( Sample Size ) Problem : How to Avert Spurious Significance Results Revisiting the Large n ( Sample Size ) Problem : How to Avert Spurious Significance Results . Stats 6 4 1323--1338 . APAC...

    2023 doi

  86. [94]

    \ McGuirk, A

    spanos2001 APACrefauthors Spanos, A. \ McGuirk, A. APACrefauthors \ 2001 . The Model Specification Problem from a Probabilistic Reduction Perspective The model specification problem from a probabilistic reduction perspective . American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83 5 11...

    2001

  87. [95]

    \ McGuirk, A

    spanos2002 APACrefauthors Spanos, A. \ McGuirk, A. APACrefauthors \ 2002 06 . The problem of near-multicollinearity revisited: erratic vs systematic volatility The problem of near-multicollinearity revisited: erratic vs systematic volatility . Journal of Econometrics 108 2 365...

    2002 doi

  88. [96]

    , Ioannidis, J P

    stanley23 APACrefauthors Stanley, T. , Ioannidis, J P. , Maier, M. , Doucouliagos, H. , Otte, W M. \ Bartoš, F. APACrefauthors \ 2023 05 . Unrestricted weighted least squares represent medical research better than random effects in 67,308 Cochrane meta-analyses Unrestricted we...

    2023

  89. [97]

    \ Doucouliagos, H

    stanley17 APACrefauthors Stanley, T D. \ Doucouliagos, H. APACrefauthors \ 2017 03 . Neither fixed nor random: weighted least squares meta‐regression Neither fixed nor random: weighted least squares meta‐regression . Research Synthesis Methods 8 1 19--42 . APACrefURL [ 2024-11...

    2017 doi

  90. [98]

    \ Clarke, M J

    clarke95 APACrefauthors Stewart, L A. \ Clarke, M J. APACrefauthors \ 1995 10 . Practical methodology of meta‐analyses (overviews) using updated individual patient data Practical methodology of meta‐analyses (overviews) using updated individual patient data . Statistics in Med...

    1995 doi

  91. [99]

    , Hamza, T H

    stijnen10 APACrefauthors Stijnen, T. , Hamza, T H. \ Özdemir, P. APACrefauthors \ 2010 12 . Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in th...

    2010 doi

  92. [100]

    APACrefauthors \ 2020

    stock20 APACrefauthors Stock, J H. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Introduction to econometrics Introduction to econometrics \ ( Fourth edition, global edition \ ). Harlow, England London New York Boston San Francisco Toronto Sydney Dubai Singapore Hong Kong Tokyo Seoul Taipei New Del...

    2020

  93. [101]

    \ Noma, H

    noma21 APACrefauthors Sugasawa, S. \ Noma, H. APACrefauthors \ 2021 01 . A unified method for improved inference in random effects meta-analysis A unified method for improved inference in random effects meta-analysis . Biostatistics 22 1 114--130 . APACrefURL [ 2024-06-06 ]htt...

    2021 doi

  94. [102]

    \ Marín-Martínez, F

    sanchez08 APACrefauthors Sánchez-Meca, J. \ Marín-Martínez, F. APACrefauthors \ 2008 . Confidence intervals for the overall effect size in random-effects meta-analysis. Confidence intervals for the overall effect size in random-effects meta-analysis. Psychological Methods 13 1...

    2008 doi

  95. [103]

    , López‐López, J A

    thom20 APACrefauthors Thom, H. , López‐López, J A. \ Welton, N J. APACrefauthors \ 2020 01 . Shared parameter model for competing risks and different data summaries in meta‐analysis: Implications for common and rare outcomes Shared parameter model for competing risks and diffe...

    2020 doi

  96. [104]

    \ Volk, S

    thoni_converging_2021 APACrefauthors Thöni, C. \ Volk, S. APACrefauthors \ 2021 06 . Converging evidence for greater male variability in time, risk, and social preferences Converging evidence for greater male variability in time, risk, and social preferences . Proceedings of t...

    2021 doi

  97. [105]

    APACrefauthors \ 2006

    timmermann06 APACrefauthors Timmermann, A. APACrefauthors \ 2006 . Chapter 4 Forecast Combinations Chapter 4 Forecast Combinations . Handbook of Economic Forecasting Handbook of Economic Forecasting \ ( 1, \ 135--196). Elsevier . APACrefURL [ 2025-01-12 ]https://linkinghub.els...

    2006 doi

  98. [106]

    \ Jackson, D

    aert19 APACrefauthors Van Aert, R C M. \ Jackson, D. APACrefauthors \ 2019 12 . A new justification of the Hartung ‐ Knapp method for random‐effects meta‐analysis based on weighted least squares regression A new justification of the Hartung ‐ Knapp method for random‐effects me...

    2019 doi

  99. [107]

    \ Wicherts, J M

    aert23 APACrefauthors Van Aert, R C M. \ Wicherts, J M. APACrefauthors \ 2023 07 . Correcting for outcome reporting bias in a meta-analysis: A meta-regression approach Correcting for outcome reporting bias in a meta-analysis: A meta-regression approach . Behavior Research Meth...

    2023 doi

  100. [108]

    , Van Assen, M A

    van_den_akker_sex_2020 APACrefauthors Van Den Akker, O R. , Van Assen, M A. , Van Vugt, M. \ Wicherts, J M. APACrefauthors \ 2020 12 . Sex differences in trust and trustworthiness: A meta-analysis of the trust game and the gift-exchange game Sex differences in trust and trustw...

    2020

  101. [109]

    , Dasgupta, S

    vesco20 APACrefauthors Vesco, P. , Dasgupta, S. , De Cian, E. \ Carraro, C. APACrefauthors \ 2020 06 . Natural resources and conflict: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature Natural resources and conflict: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature . Ecological Economics...

    2020

  102. [110]

    APACrefauthors \ 2007 05

    viech10 APACrefauthors Viechtbauer, W. APACrefauthors \ 2007 05 . Hypothesis tests for population heterogeneity in meta‐analysis Hypothesis tests for population heterogeneity in meta‐analysis . British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 60 1 29--60 . APACrefURL...

    2007 doi

  103. [111]

    APACrefauthors \ 2010

    Rviecht10 APACrefauthors Viechtbauer, W. APACrefauthors \ 2010 . Conducting Meta - Analyses in R with the metafor Package Conducting Meta - Analyses in R with the metafor Package . Journal of Statistical Software 36 3 . APACrefURL [ 2025-01-14 ]http://www.jstatsoft.org/v36/i03...

    2010 doi

  104. [112]

    , Koch, N

    wehkamp18 APACrefauthors Wehkamp, J. , Koch, N. , Lübbers, S. \ Fuss, S. APACrefauthors \ 2018 02 . Governance and deforestation — a meta-analysis in economics Governance and deforestation — a meta-analysis in economics . Ecological Economics 144 214--227 . APACrefURL [ 2025-0...

    2018 doi

  105. [113]

    APACrefauthors \ 2006

    west06 APACrefauthors West, K D. APACrefauthors \ 2006 . Chapter 3 Forecast Evaluation Chapter 3 Forecast Evaluation . Handbook of Economic Forecasting Handbook of Economic Forecasting \ ( 1, \ 99--134). Elsevier . APACrefURL [ 2025-01-11 ]https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retri...

    2006 doi

  106. [114]

    APACrefauthors \ 2010

    wooldridge_econometric_2010 APACrefauthors Wooldridge, J M. APACrefauthors \ 2010 . Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data \ ( 2. ed \ ). Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press

    2010

  107. [115]

    APACrefauthors \ 2023

    wooldridge23 APACrefauthors Wooldridge, J M. APACrefauthors \ 2023 . What is a standard error? (And how should we compute it?) What is a standard error? (and how should we compute it?) . Journal of Econometrics 237 2, Part A 105517 . APACrefURL https://www.sciencedirect.com/sc...

    2023

  108. [116]

    , Sakamoto, W

    yamaguchi14 APACrefauthors Yamaguchi, Y. , Sakamoto, W. , Goto, M. , Staessen, J A. , Wang, J. , Gueyffier, F. \ Riley, R D. APACrefauthors \ 2014 12 . Meta‐analysis of a continuous outcome combining individual patient data and aggregate data: a method based on simulated indiv...

    2014

  109. [117]

    APACrefauthors \ 2003

    zelmer APACrefauthors Zelmer, J. APACrefauthors \ 2003 . Linear Public Goods Experiments : A Meta - Analysis Linear Public Goods Experiments : A Meta - Analysis . Experimental Economics 6 3 299--310 . APACrefURL [ 2024-07-22 ]http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1026277420119 AP...

    2003 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.