Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 56 references

Fermi-LAT and FAST observation of the gamma-ray binary HESS J0632+057

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read With 15 years of Fermi-LAT data and six deep FAST observations, this paper establishes a power-law GeV spectrum for the gamma-ray binary HESS J0632+057 and finds no radio pulsations down to 2 microjansky.

desk verdict The FAST pulsation limit is a genuinely useful new null result; the GeV flux needs a gating-normalization clarification before the comparison with Li et al. (2017) can be believed. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.16881 v1 pith:HSLH6K5L submitted 2025-04-23 astro-ph.HE

Yanlv Yang , Dengke Zhou , Zihao Zhao , Jian Li , Diego F. Torres , Pei Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords gamma-raybinariesHESSJ0632+057Fermi-LATGeVspectrumradiopulsationsearchFASTorbitalmodulationfree-freeabsorption
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to settle two linked questions about the gamma-ray binary HESS J0632+057: what its GeV emission looks like after 15 years of Fermi-LAT data, and whether its compact object emits periodic radio pulses. It reports a clear GeV detection with a power-law spectrum of index $2.40\pm0.16$ and energy flux $(5.5\pm1.6)\times10^{-12}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$, a hint of a spectral turnover between roughly 10 and 100 GeV, and an orbital peak at phases 0.2-0.4 that lines up with X-ray and TeV peaks. It then uses six deep FAST observations, sensitive to 2 microjansky, to search for radio pulsations and finds none. The paper argues the non-detection does not disprove a pulsar companion, because a dense stellar wind could absorb the radio signal or the beam could miss us. If correct, the result strengthens the case that all three wavebands trace one particle population and narrows what kind of compact object can hide in this system.

What carries the argument

The analysis uses binned maximum-likelihood fitting of Fermi-LAT photons, with the nearby bright pulsar PSR J0633+0632 gated out by selecting Bayesian-block-defined off-peak phases and scaling the target's prefactor by the retained phase fraction 0.7295. The radio search uses the fast-folding algorithm on RFI-cleaned, de-dispersed FAST data over periods of 0.1-10 seconds and dispersion measures up to 1000 pc/cm$^3$. The gating isolates the target's gamma-ray signal, while the fast-folding search sets the radio pulsation upper limit.

What would settle it

A direct check: rerun the 0.1-300 GeV likelihood using the full pulsed template of PSR J0633+0632 instead of the Bayesian-block off-peak gating; if the flux or index of HESS J0632+057 moves outside the reported uncertainties, the gating correction is biased and the SED turnover hint is not secure. On the radio side, repeat the FAST search at frequencies above 5 GHz or with many visits to one orbital phase; a detected pulse would disprove the claim that no pulsation is visible down to 2 microjansky.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper reports a detection of HESS J0632+057 in the 0.1-300 GeV band with a power-law spectral index of $2.40\pm0.16$ and an energy flux of $(5.5\pm1.6)\times10^{-12}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$. The GeV spectral energy distribution hints at a turnover between about 10 and 100 GeV, with a possible additional component connecting to the TeV spectrum. In orbital phase, the GeV flux peaks at phases 0.2-0.4, matching the X-ray and TeV light curves and pointing to a common particle population. Six radio observations spread evenly over the 317.3-day orbit reach a sensitivity of about 2 microjansky for a 10% duty cycle and 0.1-10 second periods, yet no pulsation is found. The paper argues this is consistent with a pulsar hidden by free-free absorption in the dense stellar wind of the Be companion, by a radio beam not pointing at Earth, or by transient pulsation behavior.

Load-bearing premise

The gamma-ray results rest on removing the nearby pulsar's contamination by keeping only its Bayesian-block off-peak phases and scaling the target's prefactor by the retained phase fraction, 0.7295; if that correction is imperfect, the reported spectral index, flux, and turnover hint would all shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The 0.1-300 GeV spectrum is consistent with a power law of index $2.40\pm0.16$, with flux and index within $2\sigma$ of the earlier 9-year Fermi-LAT measurement.
  • The GeV peak at orbital phases 0.2-0.4 matches the X-ray and TeV peaks, indicating that GeV, X-ray, and TeV photons come from the same particle population.
  • The SED turnover between roughly 10 and 100 GeV hints at a second component connecting to the TeV spectrum, though low statistics prevent a firm determination.
  • Six FAST observations spaced across the orbit reach a minimum detectable flux of about 2 microjansky and find no periodic radio signal for periods of 0.1-10 seconds and dispersion measures up to 1000 pc/cm$^3$.
  • The absence of radio pulsation does not rule out a pulsar companion, because free-free absorption in the stellar wind, a misaligned radio beam, or transient pulsation behavior could hide it.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Read the turnover hint as provisional: if the off-peak gating is imperfect, the reported index and flux (and therefore the SED shape) shift, so the 10-100 GeV turnover should be checked with a full pulsed-template fit before being treated as established.
  • A higher-frequency radio campaign (several GHz) would directly test the free-free absorption explanation, because absorption optical depth falls steeply with frequency; a detection there would identify the compact object as a pulsar.
  • The GeV/X-ray/TeV peak at phases 0.2-0.4, if real, gives a geometrical handle: comparing the phase of maximum emission with the orbit's eccentricity and inclination can test whether the emission comes from the wind-collision region rather than the stellar disk.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper reports a 15-year Fermi-LAT analysis of the gamma-ray binary HESS J0632+057 and a campaign of six FAST radio observations. The authors apply an off-peak phase cut to exclude photons from the nearby pulsar PSR J0633+0632, fit a power-law model in 0.1-300 GeV with index 2.40 +/- 0.16 and energy flux (5.5 +/- 1.6) x 10^-12 erg cm^-2 s^-1 at TS = 28.5, examine the GeV orbital and long-term light curves, and search for radio pulsations with FAST at 1.0-1.5 GHz, reaching roughly 2 microJy sensitivity over 0.1-10 s periods. No radio pulsations are found. The authors discuss a possible GeV spectral turnover above about 10 GeV, a GeV flux excess at orbital phases 0.2-0.4, and free-free absorption in the stellar wind as a possible explanation for the radio non-detection, deriving a mass-loss rate lower limit of about 5 x 10^-8 solar masses per year.

Significance. If the gating correction is correctly specified, the Fermi measurement provides an independent, longer-baseline GeV characterization of HESS J0632+057 with spectral parameters consistent with earlier work, and the FAST null search adds a useful, well-quantified radio-pulsar constraint. The sensitivity calculation is transparent and reproducible from Eq. (2), the observation parameters are stated in Table 1, and the mass-loss-rate check connects the radio null result to the wind environment in a falsifiable way. The main caveat is the ambiguity in the phase-gating normalization, which does not affect the spectral index if the scaling is energy independent but directly affects the reported flux, luminosity, and the comparison with Li et al. (2017).

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3] The off-peak gating correction is not specified unambiguously. The text states that 'the prefactor parameters were scaled to the relative width of the phase interval 0.7295,' but it does not say whether the phase cut was implemented with gtmktime/gtexpcube2 (in which case the exposure is already reduced by 0.7295 and no manual prefactor scaling should be applied) or by filtering photons while keeping the full-time exposure (in which case the fitted flux should be divided by 0.7295). These choices imply true fluxes that differ from the reported value by factors up to about 1.9, which would change the claimed lower flux relative to Li et al. (2017) and the luminosity estimate in Section 6. Please specify the exact tool sequence and the direction of any manual scaling, and validate the normalization on a source with a known flux.
  2. [Section 4 / Abstract] The abstract overstates what the body supports. The abstract says the orbital analysis 'reveals a flux enhancement during the phase range of 0.2-0.4' and that the SED 'hints for a spectral turn-over between ~10-100 GeV,' while Section 4 explicitly states 'we could not detect significant orbital modulation' and 'we could not explicitly determine the spectral turn-over because of the low statistics.' The abstract and the summary in Section 6 should be reworded to match these caveats.
  3. [Section 4] The consistency check with Li et al. (2017) is incomplete. The paper reports TS = 22 versus 63 for what is described as the same Galactic diffuse model and observation time, and attributes the difference to 'different background source models' without demonstrating that the source-model change quantitatively accounts for the TS difference. Because this check is the closest thing to a validation of the new gating and normalization, the authors should provide the actual model comparison or state explicitly that the TS discrepancy remains unexplained.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Title / Section 3] There are typographical errors in the title and section headings: 'F AST' in the title and 'PSR J0633+632' in the Section 3 heading; also Section 3 says 'an updated gamma-ray ephemeris of HESS J0632+057,' which should read PSR J0633+0632.
  2. [Equation (2)] The symbol C in the denominator of Eq. (2) is never defined; please define C, beta, delta, and verify the units of each term so that the stated 2 microJy sensitivity can be reproduced without ambiguity.
  3. [Figure 3] The axis labels in Figure 3 appear garbled ('Energy (MeV) 3 104 105 10)' and 'dN/dE (erg cm 2 s 2 E 13'); the figure should be regenerated with correct labels.
  4. [Section 4 / Figure 4] The text says the data were divided into 'five equal orbital intervals' but the light curve in Figure 4 spans two orbital cycles; please clarify the binning and caption.
  5. [Throughout] There are several missing spaces and typos, including 'andFermi', 'located1.1- 1.7 kpc', 'Fermi-LAT and F AST', and 'non-detention' in Section 6; the Figure 5 caption also writes 'HESS J0632+05' instead of 'HESS J0632+057'.
  6. [Section 3] The phrase 'the relative width of the phase interval 0.7295' should clarify that the three off-peak intervals together have a total width of 0.7295, rather than referring to a single interval.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Fermi-LAT flux and FAST non-detection are independent measurements supported by external benchmarks, not derived from fitted inputs or self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's central results are a binned maximum-likelihood fit of 15 years of Fermi-LAT data against a 4FGL-based background model and a FAST pulsation search; neither reduces to an input by construction. The reported power-law index, energy flux, and TS values are fit outputs, not renamed inputs, and the spectral turn-over is explicitly presented as a tentative hint rather than a derived prediction. The off-peak gating of PSR J0633+0632 (Section 3) includes a prefactor scaling of 0.7295 whose direction and exposure treatment are not fully specified; this is a legitimate systematic-error concern about the measured flux, but it is not circular because the target flux is not defined as the scaled prefactor and the result is not statistically forced by a fitted parameter relabeled as a prediction. The comparison with Li et al. (2017) involves overlapping authors, but that earlier work is used as an external benchmark, not as the evidence for the present detection, and the paper performs a same-epoch, same-diffuse-model consistency check to isolate the source of the difference. The FAST non-detection is a direct null result, and the mass-loss-rate constraint follows from a published formula with stated assumptions; it is a consistency check, not a fitted output. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz, or cited author-specific premise carries the derivation. The abstract is somewhat stronger than the body's own disclaimers about orbital modulation and the spectral turn-over, but overstatement is not circularity. The derivation chain is self-contained against external data and catalog models, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central new measurement is the FAST radio pulsation upper limit; it depends on the chosen search parameters (duty cycle, period range, SNR threshold) and on the radio sensitivity model. The Fermi spectrum depends on the gating of the nearby pulsar, which is an assumption about how the phase selection affects the likelihood. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (8)
  • Assumed pulsar duty cycle = 10%
    Used in Eq. (2) to compute the 2 microJy sensitivity quoted in Table 1 and the abstract; a different duty cycle changes the sensitivity.
  • Search period range = 0.1-10 s
    The FFA search covers only periods of 0.1 to 10 s; pulsars outside this range would not be detected, so the null result is limited to this range.
  • Detection SNR threshold = 6
    Candidates with SNR above 6 are selected for visual inspection; this threshold sets the sensitivity via Eq. (2).
  • Assumed stellar wind velocity = 1000 km/s
    Input to the free-free absorption estimate in Section 6 that yields Mdot >= 5e-8 Msun/yr.
  • Assumed wind temperature = 10^4 K
    Input to the free-free absorption estimate in Section 6.
  • Assumed pulsar-star separation = 4 AU
    Taken from Casares et al. (2012) [25] and used in the absorption estimate.
  • Gaunt factor = 1
    Approximation adopted in the free-free absorption calculation.
  • Distance to source = 1.4 kpc
    Used to convert flux to luminosity; adopted from Aragona et al. (2010) and Casares et al. (2012).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The off-peak phase intervals of PSR J0633+0632 are correctly identified by Bayesian blocks, and the emission of HESS J0632+057 is constant across the pulsar's spin phases, so a uniform prefactor scaling of 0.7295 accounts for the phase cut.
    Invoked in Section 3 to justify the off-peak gating; if the target source is variable on spin-phase timescales or the scaling is misapplied, the measured flux and index would be biased.
  • domain assumption The orbital ephemeris of Adams et al. (2021) [22], P = 317.3 d and phase zero at MJD 54857.0, is valid over the 15-year Fermi dataset and the FAST observing campaign.
    Used in Section 4 for phase folding of the GeV light curve and in Table 1 to assign FAST observation phases; an incorrect period would smear the orbital modulation and misassign the radio epochs.
  • domain assumption The minimum detectable flux equation (Eq. 2) with the stated instrument parameters (Tsys+Tsky=29 K, G=16 K/Jy, np=2, Delta f=500 MHz, eps=0.93, CF_delta=1) correctly describes the FAST search sensitivity.
    The null result is only meaningful relative to this sensitivity; if the assumptions on red-noise removal or digitization losses are wrong, the 2 microJy figure could change.
  • domain assumption The free-free absorption calculation using Eq. (2) of Dubus (2013) with the assumed wind parameters correctly relates optical depth to mass-loss rate.
    Underlies the Mdot >= 5e-8 Msun/yr constraint in Section 6; different wind geometry or clumpiness would change the limit.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fermi-LAT and FAST observation of the gamma-ray binary HESS J0632+057." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HSLH6K5L

@misc{pith2026250416881,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fermi-LAT and FAST observation of the gamma-ray binary HESS J0632+057},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HSLH6K5L}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.16881}
}
abstract

Using 15 years of data from the Fermi Large Area Telescope (Fermi-LAT), we performed a comprehensive analysis on the gamma-ray binary HESS J0632+057. Its spectrum in 0.1-300 GeV band is well described by a power law model with an index of $2.40\pm0.16$, leading to an energy flux of (5.5$\pm$1.6$)\times$ 10$^{-12}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$. The GeV Spectral Energy Distribution (SED) of HESS J0632+057 hints for a spectral turn-over between $\sim$10-100 GeV. Orbital analysis reveals a flux enhancement during the phase range of 0.2-0.4, consistent with the X-ray and TeV light curves, indicating an origin of a common particle population. We carried out six deep radio observations on HESS J0632+057 with the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Telescope (FAST), evenly distributed across its orbit, reaching a detection sensitivity of 2$\mu$Jy. However, no radio pulsation was detected within these observations. The absence of radio pulsation may be attributed to the dense stellar wind environment of HESS J0632+057.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.16881 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Timing analysis of PSR J0633+0632: left panel: pulse profile shown in two periods. The pulsating phases are selected with Bayesian block calculation, illustrated in red dashed lines, and off-peak phases ϕ=0-0.0406, 0.24-0.5364 and 0.6075-1 are adopted for further analysis; right panel: pulse phase for each event vs. time. Using the pulse profile shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Fermi-LAT TS map of HESS J0632+057 region in 0.1-300 GeV. The position of HESS J0632+057 is shown with a cyan cross and the 95% confidence level of its gamma￾ray emission is shown with a cyan circle. Background 4FGL sources are shown with green crosses. 4FGL J0632.8+0550 is associated with HESS J0632+057 thus not included in the background model. The x and y axes are R.A. and decl. (J2000, degrees). with orbital-mod… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The SED and best fitted PL model of HESS J0632+057. A data point is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Orbital light curve (top) and TS value (bottom) of HESS J0632+057 in 0.1-300 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Long-term Light curve of HESS J0632+05 in 0.1-300 GeV with the binning of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Dubus, Gamma-ray binaries and related systems, A&ARv 21 (2013)

    G. Dubus, Gamma-ray binaries and related systems, A&ARv 21 (2013)

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    Aharonian, A

    F. Aharonian, A. G. Akhperjanian, K. M. Aye, A. R. Bazer-Bachi, M. Beilicke, W. Benbow, D. Berge, P. Berghaus, K. Bernlöhr, C. Bois- son, O. Bolz, V. Borrel, I. Braun, F. Breitling, A. M. Brown, J. B. Gordo, P. M. Chadwick, L. M. Chounet, R. Cornils, L. Costa- mante, B. Degrange, H. J. Dickinson, A. Djannati-Ataï, L. O. Drury, G. Dubus, D. Emmanoulopoulos...

    arXiv 2005

  3. [3]

    3.9 day orbital modulation in the TeV gamma-ray flux and spectrum from the X-ray binary LS 5039

    F. Aharonian, A. G. Akhperjanian, A. R. Bazer-Bachi, M. Beilicke, W. Benbow, D. Berge, K. Bernlöhr, C. Boisson, O. Bolz, V. Borrel, I. Braun, A. M. Brown, R. Bühler, I. Büsching, S. Carrigan, P. M. Chadwick, L. M. Chounet, R. Cornils, L. Costamante, B. Degrange, H.J.Dickinson, A.Djannati-Ataï, L.O’C.Drury, G.Dubus, K.Egberts, D. Emmanoulopoulos, P. Espiga...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2006

  4. [4]

    A. A. Abdo, M. Ackermann, M. Ajello, W. B. Atwood, M. Axels- son, L. Baldini, J. Ballet, G. Barbiellini, D. Bastieri, B. M. Baugh- man, K. Bechtol, R. Bellazzini, B. Berenji, R. Blandford, E. D. Bloom, E. Bonamente, A. W. Borgland, J. Bregeon, A. Brez, M. Brigida, P. Bruel, T. H. Burnett, G. A. Caliandro, R. A. Cameron, P. A. Car- aveo, J. M. Casandjian, ...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  5. [5]

    Discovery of the Binary Pulsar PSR B1259-63 in Very-High-Energy Gamma Rays around Periastron with H.E.S.S

    F. Aharonian, A. G. Akhperjanian, K. M. Aye, A. R. Bazer-Bachi, M. Beilicke, W. Benbow, D. Berge, P. Berghaus, K. Bernlöhr, C. Bois- son, O. Bolz, I. Braun, F. Breitling, A. M. Brown, J. Bussons Gordo, P. M. Chadwick, L. M. Chounet, R. Cornils, L. Costamante, B. De- grange, A. Djannati-Ataï, L. O’C. Drury, G. Dubus, D. Emmanoulopou- los, P. Espigat, F. Fe...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2005

  6. [6]

    Ackermann, M

    Fermi LAT Collaboration, M. Ackermann, M. Ajello, J. Ballet, G. Barbi- ellini, D. Bastieri, A. Belfiore, R. Bellazzini, B. Berenji, R. D. Blandford, E. D. Bloom, E. Bonamente, A. W. Borgland, J. Bregeon, M. Brigida, P. Bruel, R. Buehler, S. Buson, G. A. Caliandro, R. A. Cameron, P. A. Caraveo, E. Cavazzuti, C. Cecchi, Ö. Çelik, E. Charles, S. Chaty, A. Ch...

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    R. H. D. Corbet, L. Chomiuk, M. J. Coe, J. B. Coley, G. Dubus, P. G. Edwards, P. Martin, V. A. McBride, J. Stevens, J. Strader, L. J. Townsend, Discovery of the Galactic High-mass Gamma-Ray Bi- nary 4FGL J1405.1-6119, ApJ 884 (1) (2019) 93.arXiv:1908.10764, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab3e32

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    A. U. Abeysekara, W. Benbow, R. Bird, A. Brill, R. Brose, J. H. Buck- ley, A. J. Chromey, M. K. Daniel, A. Falcone, J. P. Finley, L. Fort- son, A. Furniss, A. Gent, G. H. Gillanders, D. Hanna, T. Hassan, O. Hervet, J. Holder, G. Hughes, T. B. Humensky, P. Kaaret, P. Kar, M. Kertzman, D. Kieda, M. Krause, F. Krennrich, S. Kumar, M. J. Lang, T. T. Y. Lin, G...

    arXiv 2018

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    R. H. D. Corbet, L. Chomiuk, M. J. Coe, J. B. Coley, G. Dubus, P. G. Edwards, P. Martin, V. A. McBride, J. Stevens, J. Strader, L. J. Townsend, A. Udalski, A Luminous Gamma-ray Binary in the Large Magellanic Cloud, ApJ 829 (2) (2016) 105.arXiv:1608.06647, doi:10.3847/0004-637X...

    2016 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Albert, E

    J. Albert, E. Aliu, H. Anderhub, P. Antoranz, A. Armada, C. Baix- eras, J. A. Barrio, H. Bartko, D. Bastieri, J. K. Becker, W. Bednarek, K. Berger, C. Bigongiari, A. Biland, R. K. Bock, P. Bordas, V. Bosch- Ramon, T. Bretz, I. Britvitch, M. Camara, E. Carmona, A. Chilin- garia...

    2007 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Fermi LAT Collaboration, A. A. Abdo, M. Ackermann, M. Ajello, M. Axelsson, L. Baldini, J. Ballet, G. Barbiellini, D. Bastieri, B. M. Baughman, K. Bechtol, R. Bellazzini, B. Berenji, R. D. Blandford, E. D. Bloom, E. Bonamente, A. W. Borgland, A. Brez, M. Brigida, P. Bruel, T. H...

    2009

  4. [12]

    F. A. Aharonian, A. G. Akhperjanian, A. R. Bazer-Bachi, B. Be- hera, M. Beilicke, W. Benbow, D. Berge, K. Bernlöhr, C. Boisson, O. Bolz, V. Borrel, I. Braun, E. Brion, A. M. Brown, R. Bühler, I. Büsching, T. Boutelier, S. Carrigan, P. M. Chadwick, L. M. Chounet, G. Coignet, R....

    2007 arXiv

  5. [13]

    J. A. Hinton, J. L. Skilton, S. Funk, J. Brucker, F. A. Aharo- nian, G. Dubus, A. Fiasson, Y. Gallant, W. Hofmann, A. Mar- cowith, O. Reimer, HESS J0632+057: A New Gamma-Ray Binary?, ApJL 690 (2) (2009) L101–L104. arXiv:0809.0584, doi:10.1088/ 0004-637X/690/2/L101

    2009 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Aragona, M

    C. Aragona, M. V. McSwain, M. De Becker, HD 259440: The Proposed Optical Counterpart of theγ-ray Binary HESS J0632+057, ApJ 724 (1) (2010) 306–312. arXiv:1009.2100, doi:10.1088/0004-637X/724/1/ 306

    2010 arXiv

  7. [15]

    V. A. Acciari, E. Aliu, T. Arlen, M. Beilicke, W. Benbow, D. Boltuch, S.M.Bradbury, J.H.Buckley, V.Bugaev, K.Byrum, A.Cannon, A.Ce- sarini, A. Cesarini, Y. C. Chow, L. Ciupik, P. Cogan, R. Dickherber, C. Duke, T. Ergin, A. Falcone, S. J. Fegan, J. P. Finley, G. Finnegan, P. Fo...

    2009 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Voges, B

    W. Voges, B. Aschenbach, T. Boller, H. Brauninger, U. Briel, W. Burk- ert, K. Dennerl, J. Englhauser, R. Gruber, F. Haberl, G. Hartner, G. Hasinger, E. Pfeffermann, W. Pietsch, P. Predehl, J. Schmitt, J. Trumper, U. Zimmermann, Rosat All-Sky Survey Faint Source Cat- alogue, IA...

    2000

  9. [17]

    J. Li, D. F. Torres, K. S. Cheng, E. de Oña Wilhelmi, P. Kretschmar, X. Hou, J. Takata, GeV Detection of HESS J0632+057, ApJ 846 (2) (2017) 169. arXiv:1707.04280, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa7ff7

    2017 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Abdollahi, F

    S. Abdollahi, F. Acero, M. Ackermann, M. Ajello, W. B. Atwood, M. Axelsson, L. Baldini, J. Ballet, G. Barbiellini, D. Bastieri, J. Be- cerra Gonzalez, R. Bellazzini, A. Berretta, E. Bissaldi, R. D. Bland- ford, E. D. Bloom, R. Bonino, E. Bottacini, T. J. Brandt, J. Bre- geon, ...

    2020 arXiv

  11. [19]

    A. D. Falcone, J. Grube, J. Hinton, J. Holder, G. Maier, R. Mukher- jee, J. Skilton, M. Stroh, Probing the Nature of the Unidentified TeV Gamma-Ray Source Hess J0632+057 with Swift, ApJL 708 (1) (2010) L52–L56. arXiv:0912.0941, doi:10.1088/2041-8205/708/1/L52

    2010 arXiv

  12. [20]

    S. D. Bongiorno, A. D. Falcone, M. Stroh, J. Holder, J. L. Skilton, J. A. Hinton, N. Gehrels, J. Grube, A New TeV Binary: The Discovery of an Orbital Period in HESS J0632+057, ApJL 737 (1) (2011) L11. arXiv:1104.4519, doi:10.1088/2041-8205/737/1/L11

    2011 arXiv

  13. [21]

    E. Aliu, S. Archambault, T. Aune, B. Behera, M. Beilicke, W. Benbow, K. Berger, R. Bird, A. Bouvier, J. H. Buckley, V. Bugaev, K. Byrum, M. Cerruti, X. Chen, L. Ciupik, M. P. Connolly, W. Cui, C. Duke, J. Dumm, M. Errando, A. Falcone, S. Federici, Q. Feng, J. P. Fin- ley, P. F...

    2014 arXiv

  14. [22]

    C. B. Adams, W. Benbow, A. Brill, J. H. Buckley, M. Capasso, A. J. Chromey, M. Errando, A. Falcone, K. A Farrell, Q. Feng, J. P. Fin- ley, G. M Foote, L. Fortson, A. Furniss, A. Gent, G. H. Gillanders, C. Giuri, O. Gueta, D. Hanna, T. Hassan, O. Hervet, J. Holder, B. Hona, T. ...

    2021 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Casares, M

    J. Casares, M. Ribó, I. Ribas, J. M. Paredes, F. Vilardell, I. Negueruela, On the binary nature of theγ-ray sources AGL J2241+4454 (= MWC 656)andHESSJ0632+057(=MWC148), MNRAS421(2)(2012)1103–

    2012

  16. [24]

    Moritani, T

    Y. Moritani, T. Kawano, S. Chimasu, A. Kawachi, H. Takahashi, J. Takata, A. C. Carciofi, Orbital solution leading to an acceptable inter- pretation for the enigmatic gamma-ray binary HESS J0632+057, PASJ 70 (4) (2018) 61.arXiv:1804.03831, doi:10.1093/pasj/psy053

    2018 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Matchett, B

    N. Matchett, B. van Soelen, New insight into the orbital parameters of the gamma-ray binary HESS J0632 + 057, MNRAS 536 (1) (2025) 166–173. arXiv:2411.12499, doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2597

    2025 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Chernyakova, D

    M. Chernyakova, D. Malyshev, Gamma-ray binaries, in: Multifre- quency Behaviour of High Energy Cosmic Sources - XIII. 3-8 June 2019. Palermo, 2020, p. 45.arXiv:2006.03615, doi:10.22323/1.362.0045

    2019 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Chernyakova, A

    M. Chernyakova, A. Neronov, B. van Soelen, P. Callanan, L. O’Shaughnessy, I. Babyk, S. Tsygankov, I. Vovk, R. Krivonos, J. A. Tomsick, D. Malyshev, J. Li, K. Wood, D. Torres, S. Zhang, 27 P. Kretschmar, M. V. McSwain, D. A. H. Buckley, C. Koen, Multi- wavelength observations o...

    2015 arXiv

  20. [28]

    A. M. Chen, J. Takata, S. X. Yi, Y. W. Yu, K. S. Cheng, Modelling multiwavelength emissions from PSR B1259-63/LS 2883: Effects of the stellar disc on shock radiations, A&A 627 (2019) A87. arXiv:1904. 07527, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935166

    2019 doi

  21. [29]

    Takata, P

    J. Takata, P. H. T. Tam, C. W. Ng, K. L. Li, A. K. H. Kong, C. Y. Hui, K. S. Cheng, High-energy Emissions from the Pulsar/Be Binary System PSR J2032+4127/MT91 213, ApJ 836 (2) (2017) 241.arXiv: 1702.04446, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa5c80

    2017 arXiv

  22. [30]

    A. M. Chen, J. Takata, Modelling the correlated keV/TeV light curves of Be/gamma-ray binaries, A&A 658 (2022) A153.arXiv:2112.00345, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142258

    2022 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Ballet, P

    J. Ballet, P. Bruel, T. H. Burnett, B. Lott, The Fermi-LAT collabo- ration, Fermi Large Area Telescope Fourth Source Catalog Data Re- lease 4 (4FGL-DR4), arXiv e-prints (2023) arXiv:2307.12546 arXiv: 2307.12546, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2307.12546

    2023 doi arXiv

  24. [32]

    J. R. Mattox, D. L. Bertsch, J. Chiang, B. L. Dingus, S. W. Digel, J. A. Esposito, J. M. Fierro, R. C. Hartman, S. D. Hunter, G. Kanbach, D. A. Kniffen, Y. C. Lin, D. J. Macomb, H. A. Mayer-Hasselwander, P. F. Michelson, C. von Montigny, R. Mukherjee, P. L. Nolan, P. V. Ramana...

    1996 doi

  25. [33]

    Baldini, J

    S.Abdollahi, F.Acero, M.Ackermann, M.Ajello, W.B.Atwood, M.Ax- elsson, L. Baldini, J. Ballet, G. Barbiellini, D. Bastieri, J. B. Gonzalez, R. Bellazzini, A. Berretta, E. Bissaldi, R. D. Blandford, E. D. Bloom, R. Bonino, E. Bottacini, T. J. Brandt, J. Bregeon, P. Bruel, R. Bue...

    2020

  26. [34]

    Jiang, Y

    P. Jiang, Y. Yue, H. Gan, R. Yao, H. Li, G. Pan, J. Sun, D. Yu, H. Liu, N. Tang, L. Qian, J. Lu, J. Yan, B. Peng, S. Zhang, Q. Wang, Q. Li, D. Li, FAST Collaboration, Commissioning progress of the FAST, Sci- ence China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy 62 (5) (2019) 959502. ar...

    2019 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Jiang, N.-Y

    P. Jiang, N.-Y. Tang, L.-G. Hou, M.-T. Liu, M. Krčo, L. Qian, J.-H. Sun, T.-C. Ching, B. Liu, Y. Duan, Y.-L. Yue, H.-Q. Gan, R. Yao, H. Li, G.-F. Pan, D.-J. Yu, H.-F. Liu, D. Li, B. Peng, J. Yan, FAST Collaboration, The fundamental performance of FAST with 19-beam 29 receiver ...

    2020 arXiv

  28. [36]

    L. Qian, R. Yao, J. Sun, J. Xu, Z. Pan, P. Jiang, FAST: Its Scien- tific Achievements and Prospects, The Innovation 1 (3) (2020) 100053. arXiv:2011.13542, doi:10.1016/j.xinn.2020.100053

    2020 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Morello, E

    V. Morello, E. D. Barr, B. W. Stappers, E. F. Keane, A. G. Lyne, Optimal periodicity searching: revisiting the fast folding algorithm for large-scale pulsar surveys, MNRAS 497 (4) (2020) 4654–4671.arXiv: 2004.03701, doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2291

    2020 arXiv

  30. [38]

    D. Zhou, P. Wang, D. Li, J. Fang, C. Miao, P. C. C. Freire, L. Zhang, D. Zhang, H. Chen, Y. Feng, Y. Xiao, J. Xie, X. Zhang, C. Jin, H. Wang, Y. Ke, X. Guo, R. Zhao, C. Niu, W. Zhu, M. Xue, Y. Wang, J. Wu, Z.Gan, Z.Sun, C.Wang, J.Zhang, J.Zhang, J.Cao, W.Lu, Adiscovery of two ...

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Hadasch, D

    D. Hadasch, D. F. Torres, T. Tanaka, R. H. D. Corbet, A. B. Hill, R. Dubois, G. Dubus, T. Glanzman, S. Corbel, J. Li, Y. P. Chen, S. Zhang, G. A. Caliandro, M. Kerr, J. L. Richards, W. Max-Moerbeck, A. Readhead, G. Pooley, Long-term Monitoring of the High-energyγ- Ray Emission...

    2012 arXiv

  32. [40]

    G. A. Caliandro, A. B. Hill, D. F. Torres, D. Hadasch, P. Ray, A. Abdo, J. W. T. Hessels, A. Ridolfi, A. Possenti, M. Burgay, N. Rea, P. H. T. Tam, R. Dubois, G. Dubus, T. Glanzman, T. Jogler, The missing GeV γ-ray binary: searching for HESS J0632+057 with Fermi-LAT, MN- RAS 4...

    2013 arXiv

  33. [41]

    G. A. Caliandro, C. C. Cheung, J. Li, J. D. Scargle, D. F. Torres, K. S. Wood, M. Chernyakova, Gamma-Ray Flare Activity from PSR B1259- 63 during 2014 Periastron Passage and Comparison to Its 2010 Passage, ApJ 811 (1) (2015) 68.arXiv:1509.02856, doi:10.1088/0004-637X/ 811/1/68. 30

    2015 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Aleksić, E

    J. Aleksić, E. A. Alvarez, L. A. Antonelli, P. Antoranz, M. Asensio, M. Backes, U. Barres de Almeida, J. A. Barrio, D. Bastieri, J. Becerra González, W. Bednarek, K. Berger, E. Bernardini, A. Biland, O. Blanch, R. K. Bock, A. Boller, G. Bonnoli, D. Borla Tridon, V. Bosch-Ramon...

    2012

  35. [43]

    Johnston, R

    S. Johnston, R. N. Manchester, A. G. Lyne, M. Bailes, V. M. Kaspi, G. Qiao, N. D’Amico, PSR 1259-63: A Binary Radio Pulsar with a Be Star Companion, ApJL 387 (1992) L37.doi:10.1086/186300. 31

    1992 doi

  36. [44]

    Camilo, P

    F. Camilo, P. S. Ray, S. M. Ransom, M. Burgay, T. J. Johnson, M. Kerr, E. V. Gotthelf, J. P. Halpern, J. Reynolds, R. W. Romani, P. Demor- est, S. Johnston, W. van Straten, P. M. Saz Parkinson, M. Ziegler, M. Dormody, D. J. Thompson, D. A. Smith, A. K. Harding, A. A. Abdo, F. ...

    2009 arXiv

  37. [45]

    S.-S. Weng, L. Qian, B.-J. Wang, D. F. Torres, A. Papitto, P. Jiang, R. Xu, J. Li, J.-Z. Yan, Q.-Z. Liu, M.-Y. Ge, Q.-R. Yuan, Radio pulsations from a neutron star within the gamma-ray binary LS I +61° 303, Nature Astronomy 6 (2022) 698–702. arXiv:2203.09423, doi:10.1038/s4155...

    2022 arXiv

  38. [46]

    R. T. Emmering, R. A. Chevalier, The Intrinsic Luminosity and Initial Period of Pulsars, ApJ 345 (1989) 931.doi:10.1086/167963

    1989 doi

  39. [47]

    Kijak, J

    J. Kijak, J. Gil, Radio emission altitude in pulsars, A&A 397 (2003) 969–972. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021583

    2003 doi

  40. [48]

    Takata, Y

    J. Takata, Y. Wang, K. S. Cheng, Population Study forγ-ray Pulsars with the Outer Gap Model, ApJ 726 (1) (2011) 44.arXiv:1010.5870, doi:10.1088/0004-637X/726/1/44

    2011 arXiv

  41. [49]

    A. M. Chen, Y. D. Guo, Y. W. Yu, J. Takata, Radio absorption in high- mass gamma-ray binaries, A&A 652 (2021) A39. arXiv:2106.10445, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140951

    2021 arXiv

  42. [50]

    L. B. F. M. Waters, E. P. J. van den Heuvel, A. R. Taylor, G. M. H. J. Habets, P. Persi, Evidence for low-velocity winds in Be/X-ray binaries., A&A 198 (1988) 200–210

    1988

  43. [51]

    Archer, W

    A. Archer, W. Benbow, R. Bird, A. Brill, R. Brose, M. Buchovecky, J. L. Christiansen, A. J. Chromey, W. Cui, A. Falcone, Q. Feng, J. P. Finley, L. Fortson, A. Furniss, A. Gent, G. H. Gillanders, C. Giuri, O. Gueta, D. Hanna, T. Hassan, O. Hervet, J. Holder, G. Hughes, T. B. Hu...

    2020 arXiv

  44. [52]

    R. K. Zamanov, K. A. Stoyanov, J. Martí, G. Y. Latev, Y. M. Nikolov, M. F. Bode, P. L. Luque-Escamilla, Optical spectroscopy of Be/gamma- ray binaries, A&A 593 (2016) A97.arXiv:1605.05811, doi:10.1051/ 0004-6361/201628735

    2016 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Moldón, M

    J. Moldón, M. Ribó, J. M. Paredes, Revealing the extended radio emis- sion from the gamma-ray binary HESS J0632+057, A&A 533 (2011) L7. arXiv:1108.0437, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117764. 33

    2011 arXiv

  46. [64]

    arXiv:1307.7083, doi:10.1007/s00159-013-0064-5

    arXiv

  47. [189]

    arXiv:1202.3164, doi:10.1126/science.1213974

    arXiv

  48. [1112]

    arXiv:1201.1726, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20368.x

    2011 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.