Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 60 references

Enhancing high-order harmonic generation in two-color laser fields: A comparison of single- and two-color schemes

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Measured side by side in argon, two-color 800-266 nm driving fields outperform single-color 800 nm harmonic generation by factors from 2 to 3800, and below 20 eV the 1.3:1.0 intensity ratio is the best scheme.

desk verdict Useful same-apparatus HHG driver comparison, but the headline enhancements are a per-harmonic phase envelope rather than a single-setting result. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.16928 v2 pith:7CR57FP6 submitted 2025-04-23 physics.optics physics.app-phphysics.atom-ph

Jan Tross , Travis Severt , eorgios Kolliopoulos , Pratap Timilsina , Itzik Ben-Itzhak , Carlos A. Trallero-Herrero This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.app-phphysics.atom-ph PACS 42.65.Ky
keywords high-orderharmonicgenerationtwo-colorlaserfields800-266nmdrivingfield800-400argongasjetyieldenhancementbeamdivergenceshortelectrontrajectories
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a direct, same-setup comparison of high-order harmonic generation (HHG) in argon driven by single-color 800, 400, and 266 nm pulses and by two-color 800-400 nm and 800-266 nm pulses. It finds that the two-color fields outperform the single-color 800 nm field by factors of 2 to 3800, depending on photon energy and intensity ratio. For photon energies below 20 eV, the 800-266 nm field at an intensity ratio of 1.3:1.0 is the strongest driver, roughly matching the single-color 266 nm field at 14.4 eV and exceeding every other scheme there. For common photon energies above 20 eV, the two-color schemes produce similar yields. It also finds that 800-266 nm drivers produce harmonics with smaller divergence than the other schemes, which the authors interpret as selection of short electron trajectories.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the phase-stabilized two-color waveform: an interferometer recombines the 800 nm fundamental with either its second harmonic (400 nm) or third harmonic (266 nm) generated in the other arm, and a piezo-controlled delay sets the relative phase. Because the relative phase between colors controls how the combined electric field breaks or preserves half-cycle symmetry, it directly changes which electron trajectories recombine, which the authors tune per harmonic for maximum yield. The second key piece is the calibrated VUV spectrometer, consisting of a grating, microchannel plates, and a camera, whose efficiency corrections convert raw images into per-harmonic photon yields and divergence widths.

What would settle it

One could settle the ranking by independently calibrating the VUV detection chain in situ, for example by measuring the grating and microchannel-plate response against a calibrated photodiode across 14 to 40 eV, then re-comparing the five schemes corrected with that measured response; if the 800-266 nm 1.3:1.0 field no longer leads below 20 eV, the central ranking claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is a measured performance ranking: under fixed maximum input power and optimized phase-matching per field, the two-color 800-266 nm driver at 1.3:1.0 intensity ratio produces the highest harmonic flux for photon energies below 20 eV (3800 times the 800 nm yield at 14.4 eV), while above 20 eV the 800-400 and 800-266 nm two-color fields are roughly equivalent and both remain far above the single-color 800 nm yield. The same 800-266 nm field also produces the narrowest harmonic divergence above 15 eV, consistent with the theoretical prediction that omega-3omega waveforms enhance recombination of short-trajectory electrons. The authors conclude that the best scheme depends on target photon energy and application: single-color 400 and 266 nm fields match the two-color flux at low energies and are simpler, while two-color fields extend the useful range to higher photon energies.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's enhancement factors and scheme ranking rest on the detector calibration corrections (grating polarization efficiency, microchannel-plate quantum efficiency, and slit acceptance) that are stated but not validated or assigned uncertainties; if those corrections are wrong, the numbers and the ranking could change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For photon energies below 20 eV, an 800-266 nm driver with a 1.3:1.0 intensity ratio is the highest-yield choice among the measured schemes, delivering about 3800 times the 800 nm yield at 14.4 eV.
  • Above 20 eV, the 800-400 and 800-266 nm two-color fields give comparable yields, so users can base the choice on other factors such as harmonic spacing or beam divergence.
  • Single-color 400 and 266 nm fields match the two-color flux at the lowest common photon energies, so the simpler single-color setup is preferable when only those photon energies are needed.
  • The narrower divergence of 800-266 nm harmonics makes these fields the better option when downstream beam collimation or mode-matching matters, not just raw yield.
  • The observed narrow divergence supports the theoretical picture that omega-3omega waveforms preferentially select short electron trajectories, implying that waveform control can engineer spatial beam properties.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension is to re-run the ranking with peak intensity matched rather than input power fixed; the paper's pragmatic fixed-power comparison means the two-color enhancement at high photon energies could partly reflect the 800 nm arm's larger ponderomotive energy rather than waveform shape alone.
  • The divergence data invite a quantitative test: fitting the measured angular profiles of each harmonic with trajectory-resolved simulations of short and long electron paths could extract trajectory amplitudes, something the paper does not attempt.
  • Because the optimal 800-266 nm intensity ratio likely depends on the target gas's ionization and recombination properties, repeating the same comparison in neon or helium could shift the per-energy ranking.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper reports an experimental comparison of high-order harmonic generation (HHG) in argon driven by single-color 800, 400, and 266 nm fields and two-color 800-400 and 800-266 nm fields. The authors measure integrated harmonic yields and divergence widths under conditions in which the input power is fixed and phase-matching is optimized for each driver. For the two-color fields, the relative phase between the colors is chosen per harmonic to maximize the total yield. They report that the two-color fields outperform the single-color 800 nm field by factors of 2-3800 depending on photon energy and scheme, that the 800-266 nm field with intensity ratio 1.3:1.0 is the best scheme below 20 eV, and that this field produces narrower harmonic divergence, which they attribute to short-trajectory selection. The main deliverable is a practical ranking of driving schemes for the 15-40 eV photon-energy range.

Significance. If the reported enhancements and ranking are correct, this is a useful benchmark for laboratories choosing a driving scheme for HHG in the VUV range. The study is a direct measurement with no fitting or free parameters, and it compares all schemes under the same apparatus and gas conditions, which is a genuine strength. The interferometer stability (±50 as) is documented from prior work, and the divergence comparison adds a practical beam-quality criterion beyond yield. The central quantitative claims, however, hinge on two unquantified issues: the yield corrections for detector/wavelength response and the per-harmonic phase optimization procedure. These issues affect the reliability of the enhancement factors and the prescriptive conclusion, so the significance will be high only after they are addressed.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV, Fig. 2] The two-color yield curves are constructed by optimizing the relative phase separately for each harmonic: the text states 'we chose the phase between the two colors that optimizes the total yield for each individual harmonic.' This means every point in the two-color curves is the maximum over a phase scan, so the plotted enhancement spectrum is an envelope of generally different experimental settings. A user who chooses a single fixed phase will see a different relative-yield spectrum, and the reported ranking of schemes (especially the 3800x enhancement at 14.4 eV and the superiority of the 1.3:1.0 800-266 nm field below 20 eV) may not be realizable with a single phase setting. The paper neither reports the optimal phase for each harmonic nor shows that there exists a common phase that approximately reproduces the plotted enhancement curves. Please provide either (a) the phase dependence for representative harmonics and a demonstration that a common phase reproduces the main ranking, or (b) a re-analysis at a fixed phase chosen before data inspection. Without this, the prescriptive conclusion in Section V is not supported by the data as presented.
  2. [Section II and Fig. 2] The absolute and relative yields rely on corrections for the polarization-sensitive grating efficiency, the wavelength-dependent MCP quantum efficiency (taken from Ref. [52]), and the slit acceptance, yet no validation or uncertainty estimate is given for these corrections. The paper mentions 'estimated errors' in Section IV but no error bars appear in Fig. 2 or Fig. 3, and the numerical enhancement factors (e.g., 2300x at 14.4 eV and 3800x at 14.4 eV) are presented without any uncertainty. Since these factors are the central quantitative claims, please quantify the systematic uncertainties in the detection corrections, show how the raw (uncorrected) data compare, and add error bars or at least a table of uncertainties to the yield and enhancement plots.
  3. [Section IV and Fig. 3] The divergence comparison is presented as a supporting result, but the divergence values in Fig. 3(e) are also given without uncertainties. The claim that the 800-266 nm fields produce 'significantly narrower' divergence (e.g., more than two times smaller for harmonic 21) would be more convincing with error bars or a statistical test, especially because the divergence is defined as a 1/e^2 full width evaluated from the interacting region to the detector plane, which involves propagation and background subtraction choices. This is not as load-bearing as the yield ranking, but since it is part of the stated advantages of the 800-266 nm scheme, please provide at least representative uncertainties.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors: 'SUMMAR Y' in the Section V heading, 'atleast' in Section IV, and 'full width-half maximum intensity' in Section II should be 'full width at half maximum.'
  2. [References] References [58], [59], and [60] appear in the reference list but are not cited in the text. Please either cite them where relevant (e.g., gas-medium effects, waveguide generation, coherence) or remove them.
  3. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption states that the number in parentheses represents the intensity in units of 10^14 W/cm2, but the figure legend also uses labels like '1.3:1.0' for the two-color fields; please clarify in the caption that for two-color fields both numbers are in the same units and that the first number corresponds to the 800 nm component.
  4. [Section II] The description of the polarization states is confusing: it is stated that 'the 400 nm light is orthogonally polarized to the 800 nm field' and later that a half-wave plate 'rotates the 800 nm light to the same polarization direction as the 400 nm light' for THG. Please make the polarization sequence explicit, including which waveplate acts on which beam, so that the ω-2ω and ω-3ω configurations are unambiguous.
  5. [Fig. 1] The text refers to 'Fig. 1(a)' but the figure appears to be a single schematic with subpanels not clearly labeled. Please label the panels and refer to them explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the yield comparison is direct measurement, with only incidental self-citation.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are direct experimental measurements: integrated harmonic yields for single- and two-color driving fields are compared after detector calibration, with no fitted parameter, no theory-derived quantity, and no derivation chain that reduces to its inputs. The self-citation [49] is for the interferometer design and stability measurement, which is an engineering detail and not an input to the measured ranking. The MCP detection-efficiency correction cites an external reference [52], and the short-trajectory interpretation explicitly cites external theory by Jin et al. and is labeled as a suggestion ('may suggest', 'support their prediction'). The per-harmonic phase optimization is a data-acquisition protocol that defines the measured optimized yield, not a circular construction; any concern about the practical reproducibility of the phase-stitched envelope is an empirical comparability issue, not circularity. Therefore the paper is self-contained with respect to its central quantitative claims, and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new theoretical quantities are introduced; the results are direct measurements. The only manually-tuned experimental parameter is the two-color phase, optimized per harmonic. The main assumptions are standard HHG theory and external detector calibration data.

free parameters (1)
  • relative phase between the two colors = optimized for each harmonic (not reported)
    The phase was scanned and set to the value giving maximum yield for each harmonic. This is an experimental control rather than a fitted model parameter, but it means the reported 'enhancement' is the best-case value over phase.
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The standard three-step model and the usual cutoff formula (I_p + 3.17 U_p) are adequate to interpret which harmonics are above the 266 nm cutoff.
    Used in Section III to explain why the 266 nm yield falls at 24 eV ('this photon energy is beyond the expected cutoff').
  • domain assumption The detection-efficiency corrections from Ref. [52] are accurate.
    Load-bearing for cross-wavelength comparisons; the paper provides no validation or uncertainty estimate for these corrections.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Enhancing high-order harmonic generation in two-color laser fields: A comparison of single- and two-color schemes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7CR57FP6

@misc{pith2026250416928,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Enhancing high-order harmonic generation in two-color laser fields: A comparison of single- and two-color schemes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7CR57FP6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.16928}
}
read the original abstract

We compare the enhancement of high-order harmonic generation in argon using 800--400 and 800--266~nm laser fields with their optimized single-color counterparts. We observe that the two-color fields generally outperform the single-color 800~nm field by factors of 2 to 3800, depending on the photon energy and generation scheme. From this comparison, we determine which scheme is optimal for each photon energy. We also observe that the divergence of HHG produced by the 800--266~nm laser fields is smaller than that of the other single- and two-color driving fields, perhaps suggesting that the 800--266~nm fields optimize the recombination probability of the so-called ``short" electron trajectories.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.16928 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic of the experimental setup (see text for description). The setup is the same as the one used in our previous [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) The integrated harmonic yields for the single color 800 nm (1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The first three panels show the harmonic yield as a function of divergence angle and photon energy for the optimized [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [52]

    Martin and S

    C. Martin and S. Bowyer, Quantum efficiency of opaque CsI photocathodes with channel electron multiplier arrays in the extreme and far ultraviolet, Applied Optics 21, 4206 (1982)

    work page 1982

  2. [49]

    Severt, J

    T. Severt, J. Troß, G. Kolliopoulos, I. Ben-Itzhak, and C. A. Trallero-Herrero, Enhancing high-order harmonic generation by controlling the diffusion of the electron wave packet, Optica 8, 1113 (2021)

    work page 2021

  3. [1]

    Sali` eres, A

    P. Sali` eres, A. L'Huillier, P. Antoine, and M. Lewenstein, Study of the spatial and temporal coherence of high-order harmonics, in Advances In Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics (Elsevier, 1999) pp. 83–142

    work page 1999

  4. [2]

    Bellini, C

    M. Bellini, C. Lyng˚ a, A. Tozzi, M. B. Gaarde, T. W. H¨ ansch, A. L’Huillier, and C.-G. Wahlstr¨ om, Temporal coherence of ultrashort high-order harmonic pulses, Physical Review Letters 81, 297 (1998)

    work page 1998

  5. [3]

    R. A. Bartels, A. Paul, H. Green, H. C. Kapteyn, M. M. Murnane, S. Backus, I. P. Christov, Y. Liu, D. Attwood, and C. Jacobsen, Generation of spatially coherent light at extreme ultraviolet wavelengths, Science 297, 376 (2002)

    work page 2002

  6. [4]

    Benko, T

    C. Benko, T. K. Allison, A. Cing¨ oz, L. Hua, F. Labaye, D. C. Yost, and J. Ye, Extreme ultraviolet radiation with coherence time greater than 1 s, Nature Photonics 8, 530 (2014)

    work page 2014

  7. [5]

    Terschl¨ usen, M

    J. Terschl¨ usen, M. Ag˚ aker, M. Svanqvist, S. Plogmaker, J. Nordgren, J.-E. Rubensson, H. Siegbahn, and J. S¨ oderstr¨ om, Measuring the temporal coherence of a high harmonic generation setup employing a fourier transform spectrometer for the VUV/XUV, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors a...

    work page 2014

  8. [6]

    Huang, Y

    S. Huang, Y. Ding, Y. Feng, E. Hemsing, Z. Huang, J. Krzywinski, A. Lutman, A. Marinelli, T. Maxwell, and D. Zhu, Generating single-spike hard x-ray pulses with nonlinear bunch compression in free-electron lasers, Physical Review Letters 119, 10.1103/physrevlett.119.154801 (2017)

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.154801 2017

Show all 60 references
  1. [7]

    R. N. Coffee, J. P. Cryan, J. Duris, W. Helml, S. Li, and A. Marinelli, Development of ultrafast capabilities for x-ray free-electron lasers at the linac coherent light source, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 3...

    2019

  2. [8]

    Duris, S

    J. Duris, S. Li, T. Driver, E. G. Champenois, J. P. MacArthur, A. A. Lutman, Z. Zhang, P. Rosenberger, J. W. Aldrich, R. Coffee, G. Coslovich, F.-J. Decker, J. M. Glownia, G. Hartmann, W. Helml, A. Kamalov, J. Knurr, J. Krzywinski, M.-F. Lin, J. P. Marangos, M. Nantel, A. Nata...

    2019

  3. [9]

    Chang, Fundamentals of Attosecond Optics (CRC Press, 2011)

    Z. Chang, Fundamentals of Attosecond Optics (CRC Press, 2011). 8

    2011

  4. [10]

    C. D. Lin, A.-T. Le, C. Jin, and H. Wei, Attosecond and Strong-Field Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    2018

  5. [11]

    Takahashi, Y

    E. Takahashi, Y. Nabekawa, and K. Midorikawa, Generation of 10-µj coherent extreme-ultraviolet light by use of high-order harmonics, Opt. Lett. 27, 1920 (2002)

    2002

  6. [12]

    H¨ adrich, J

    S. H¨ adrich, J. Rothhardt, M. Krebs, S. Demmler, A. Klenke, A. T¨ unnermann, and J. Limpert, Single-pass high harmonic generation at high repetition rate and photon flux, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics49, 172002 (2016)

    2016

  7. [13]

    C. M. Heyl, C. L. Arnold, A. Couairon, and A. L’Huillier, Introduction to macroscopic power scaling principles for high- order harmonic generation, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 50, 013001 (2017)

    2017

  8. [14]

    Makos, I

    I. Makos, I. Orfanos, A. Nayak, J. Peschel, B. Major, I. Liontos, E. Skantzakis, N. Papadakis, C. Kalpouzos, M. Dumergue, S. K¨ uhn, K. Varju, P. Johnsson, A. L’Hullier, P. Tzallas, and D. Charalambidis, A 10-gigawatt attosecond source for non- linear xuv optics and xuv-pump-x...

    2020

  9. [15]

    Tamaki, J

    Y. Tamaki, J. Itatani, Y. Nagata, M. Obara, and K. Midorikawa, Highly efficient, phase-matched high-harmonic generation by a self-guided laser beam, Physical Review Letters 82, 1422 (1999)

    1999

  10. [16]

    J. R. Sutherland, E. L. Christensen, N. D. Powers, S. E. Rhynard, J. C. Painter, and J. Peatross, High harmonic generation in a semi-infinite gas cell, Optics Express 12, 4430 (2004)

    2004

  11. [17]

    Rudawski, C

    P. Rudawski, C. M. Heyl, F. Brizuela, J. Schwenke, A. Persson, E. Mansten, R. Rakowski, L. Rading, F. Campi, B. Kim, P. Johnsson, and A. L’Huillier, A high-flux high-order harmonic source, Review of Scientific Instruments84, 073103 (2013)

    2013

  12. [18]

    Sun, P.-C

    H.-W. Sun, P.-C. Huang, Y.-H. Tzeng, J.-T. Huang, C. D. Lin, C. Jin, and M.-C. Chen, Extended phase matching of high harmonic generation by plasma-induced defocusing, Optica 4, 976 (2017)

    2017

  13. [19]

    Rundquist, C

    A. Rundquist, C. G. Durfee, Z. Chang, C. Herne, S. Backus, M. M. Murnane, and H. C. Kapteyn, Phase-matched generation of coherent soft x-rays, Science 280, 1412 (1998)

    1998

  14. [20]

    Pfeifer, R

    T. Pfeifer, R. Kemmer, R. Spitzenpfeil, D. Walter, C. Winterfeldt, G. Gerber, and C. Spielmann, Spatial control of high-harmonic generation in hollow fibers, Optics Letters 30, 1497 (2005)

    2005

  15. [21]

    A. Paul, E. Gibson, X. Zhang, A. Lytle, T. Popmintchev, X. Zhou, M. Murnane, I. Christov, and H. Kapteyn, Phase- matching techniques for coherent soft x-ray generation, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 42, 14 (2006)

    2006

  16. [22]

    Popmintchev, M.-C

    T. Popmintchev, M.-C. Chen, A. Bahabad, M. Gerrity, P. Sidorenko, O. Cohen, I. P. Christov, M. M. Murnane, and H. C. Kapteyn, Phase matching of high harmonic generation in the soft and hard x-ray regions of the spectrum, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106, 105...

    2009

  17. [23]

    Adachi, T

    S. Adachi, T. Horio, and T. Suzuki, Generation of intense single-order harmonic pulse in the vacuum ultraviolet region using a deep ultraviolet driving laser, Opt. Lett. 37, 2118 (2012)

    2012

  18. [24]

    Popmintchev, C

    D. Popmintchev, C. Hern´ andez-Garc´ ıa, F. Dollar, C. Mancuso, J. A. P´ erez-Hern´ andez, M.-C. Chen, A. Hankla, X. Gao, B. Shim, A. L. Gaeta, M. Tarazkar, D. A. Romanov, R. J. Levis, J. A. Gaffney, M. Foord, S. B. Libby, A. Jaron-Becker, A. Becker, L. Plaja, M. M. Murnane, H...

    2015

  19. [25]

    H. Wang, Y. Xu, S. Ulonska, J. S. Robinson, P. Ranitovic, and R. A. Kaindl, Bright high-repetition-rate source of narrowband extreme-ultraviolet harmonics beyond 22 eV, Nature Communications 6, 10.1038/ncomms8459 (2015)

    2015 doi

  20. [26]

    Marceau, T

    C. Marceau, T. J. Hammond, A. Y. Naumov, P. B. Corkum, and D. M. Villeneuve, Wavelength scaling of high harmonic generation for 267 nm, 400 nm and 800 nm driving laser pulses, Journal of Physics Communications 1, 015009 (2017)

    2017

  21. [27]

    Adachi and T

    S. Adachi and T. Suzuki, UV-driven harmonic generation for time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy of polyatomic molecules, Applied Sciences 8, 1784 (2018)

    2018

  22. [28]

    Watanabe, K

    S. Watanabe, K. Kondo, Y. Nabekawa, A. Sagisaka, and Y. Kobayashi, Two-color phase control in tunneling ionization and harmonic generation by a strong laser field and its third harmonic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2692 (1994)

    1994

  23. [29]

    Andiel, G

    U. Andiel, G. D. Tsakiris, E. Cormier, and K. Witte, High-order harmonic amplitude modulation in two-colour phase- controlled frequency mixing, EPL (Europhysics Letters) 47, 42 (1999)

    1999

  24. [30]

    Cormier and M

    E. Cormier and M. Lewenstein, Optimizing the efficiency in high order harmonic generation optimization by two-color fields, The European Physical Journal D - Atomic, Molecular, Optical and Plasma Physics 12, 227 (2000)

    2000

  25. [31]

    I. Kim, C. Kim, H. Kim, G. Lee, Y. Lee, J. Park, D. Cho, and C. Nam, Highly efficient high-harmonic generation in an orthogonally polarized two-color laser field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 243901 (2005)

    2005

  26. [32]

    T. T. Liu, T. Kanai, T. Sekikawa, and S. Watanabe, Significant enhancement of high-order harmonics below 10 nm in a two-color laser field, Phys. Rev. A 73, 063823 (2006)

    2006

  27. [33]

    I. J. Kim, G. H. Lee, S. B. Park, Y. S. Lee, T. K. Kim, C. H. Nam, T. Mocek, and K. Jakubczak, Generation of submicrojoule high harmonics using a long gas jet in a two-color laser field, Applied Physics Letters 92, 021125 (2008)

    2008

  28. [34]

    Lambert, J

    G. Lambert, J. Gautier, C. P. Hauri, P. Zeitoun, C. Valentin, T. Marchenko, F. Tissandier, J. P. Goddet, M. Ribiere, G. Rey, M. Fajardo, and S. Sebban, An optimized kHz two-colour high harmonic source for seeding free-electron lasers and plasma-based soft x-ray lasers, New Jou...

    2009

  29. [35]

    Brugnera, F

    L. Brugnera, F. Frank, D. J. Hoffmann, R. Torres, T. Siegel, J. G. Underwood, E. Springate, C. Froud, E. I. C. Turcu, J. W. G. Tisch, and J. P. Marangos, Enhancement of high harmonics generated by field steering of electrons in a two-color orthogonally polarized laser field, O...

    2010

  30. [36]

    Siegel, R

    T. Siegel, R. Torres, D. J. Hoffmann, L. Brugnera, I. Procino, A. Za¨ ır, J. G. Underwood, E. Springate, I. C. E. Turcu, L. E. Chipperfield, and J. P. Marangos, High harmonic emission from a superposition of multiple unrelated frequency fields, Opt. Express 18, 6853 (2010)

    2010

  31. [37]

    P. Wei, J. Miao, Z. Zeng, C. Li, X. Ge, R. Li, and Z. Xu, Selective enhancement of a single harmonic emission in a driving laser field with subcycle waveform control, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 233903 (2013). 9

    2013

  32. [38]

    Brizuela, C

    F. Brizuela, C. M. Heyl, P. Rudawski, D. Kroon, L. Rading, J. M. Dahlstr¨ om, J. Mauritsson, P. Johnsson, C. L. Arnold, and A. L’Huillier, Efficient high-order harmonic generation boosted by below-threshold harmonics, Sci. Rep.3, 1410 (2013)

    2013

  33. [39]

    P. Wei, Z. Zeng, J. Jiang, J. Miao, Y. Zheng, X. Ge, C. Li, and R. Li, Selective generation of an intense single harmonic from a long gas cell with loosely focusing optics based on a three-color laser field, Applied Physics Letters 104, 151101 (2014)

    2014

  34. [40]

    C. Jin, G. Wang, H. Wei, A.-T. Le, and C. D. Lin, Waveforms for optimal sub-kev high-order harmonics with synthesized two- or three-colour laser fields, Nat Commun 5 (2014)

    2014

  35. [41]

    C. Jin, G. Wang, A.-T. Le, and C. D. Lin, Route to optimal generation of soft x-ray high harmonics with synthesized two-color laser pulses, Scientific Reports 4, 7067 (2014)

    2014

  36. [42]

    Haessler, T

    S. Haessler, T. Balˇ ciunas, G. Fan, G. Andriukaitis, A. Pugˇ zlys, A. Baltuˇ ska, T. Witting, R. Squibb, A. Za¨ ır, J. W. G. Tisch, J. P. Marangos, and L. E. Chipperfield, Optimization of quantum trajectories driven by strong-field waveforms, Phys. Rev. X 4, 021028 (2014)

    2014

  37. [43]

    Jin, K.-H

    C. Jin, K.-H. Hong, and C. D. Lin, Optimal generation of high harmonics in the water-window region by synthesizing 800-nm and mid-infrared laser pulses, Opt. Lett. 40, 3754 (2015)

    2015

  38. [44]

    T. Kroh, C. Jin, P. Krogen, P. D. Keathley, A.-L. Calendron, J. P. Siqueira, H. Liang, E. L. Falc˜ ao-Filho, C. D. Lin, F. X. K¨ artner, and K.-H. Hong, Enhanced high-harmonic generation up to the soft x-ray region driven by mid-infrared pulses mixed with their third harmonic,...

    2018

  39. [45]

    Sayrac, A

    M. Sayrac, A. A. Kolomenskii, J. Dong, and H. A. Schuessler, Generation of enhanced even harmonics of fundamental radiation in temporally separated two-color laser fields, Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena 233, 22 (2019)

    2019

  40. [46]

    A.-K. Raab, M. Redon, S. R. Abbing, Y. Fang, C. Guo, P. Smorenburg, J. Mauritsson, A.-L. Viotti, A. L’Huillier, and C. L. Arnold, XUV yield optimization of two-color high-order harmonic generation in gases, Nanophotonics 10.1515/nanoph- 2024-0579 (2025)

    2025 doi

  41. [47]

    Cirmi, R

    G. Cirmi, R. E. Mainz, M. A. Silva-Toledo, F. Scheiba, H. C ¸ ankaya, M. Kubullek, G. M. Rossi, and F. X. K¨ artner, Optical Waveform Synthesis and Its Applications, Laser & Photonics Reviews 17, 2200588 (2023)

    2023

  42. [48]

    B. Li, X. Tang, K. Wang, C. Zhang, Z. Guan, B. Wang, C. D. Lin, and C. Jin, Generation of Intense Low-Divergence Isolated Soft-X-Ray Attosecond Pulses in a Gas-Filled Waveguide Using Three-Color Synthesized Laser Pulses, Physical Review Applied 18, 034048 (2022)

    2022

  43. [50]

    Comby, D

    A. Comby, D. Descamps, S. Beauvarlet, A. Gonzalez, F. Guichard, S. Petit, Y. Zaouter, and Y. Mairesse, Cascaded harmonic generation from a fiber laser: a milliwatt XUV source, Optics Express 27, 20383 (2019)

    2019

  44. [51]

    Langdon, J

    B. Langdon, J. Garlick, X. Ren, D. J. Wilson, A. M. Summers, S. Zigo, M. F. Kling, S. Lei, C. G. Elles, E. Wells, E. D. Poliakoff, K. D. Carnes, V. Kumarappan, I. Ben-Itzhak, and C. A. Trallero-Herrero, Carrier-envelope-phase stabilized terawatt class laser at 1 khz with a wav...

    2015

  45. [53]

    Trebino, K

    R. Trebino, K. W. DeLong, D. N. Fittinghoff, J. N. Sweetser, M. A. Krumb¨ ugel, B. A. Richman, and D. J. Kane, Measuring ultrashort laser pulses in the time-frequency domain using frequency-resolved optical gating, Review of Scientific Instruments 68, 3277 (1997)

    1997

  46. [54]

    Nugent-Glandorf, M

    L. Nugent-Glandorf, M. Scheer, M. Krishnamurthy, J. W. Odom, and S. R. Leone, Photoelectron spectroscopic determina- tion of the energy bandwidths of high-order harmonics (7th–55th) produced by an ultrafast laser in neon, Physical Review A 62, 10.1103/physreva.62.023812 (2000)

    2000 doi

  47. [55]

    Frassetto, C

    F. Frassetto, C. Cacho, C. A. Froud, I. E. Turcu, P. Villoresi, W. A. Bryan, E. Springate, and L. Poletto, Single-grating monochromator for extreme-ultraviolet ultrashort pulses, Optics Express 19, 19169 (2011)

    2011

  48. [56]

    Dudovich, O

    N. Dudovich, O. Smirnova, J. Levesque, Y. Mairesse, M. Y. Ivanov, D. M. Villeneuve, and P. B. Corkum, Measuring and controlling the birth of attosecond xuv pulses, Nat Phys 2, 781 (2006)

    2006

  49. [57]

    Brugnera, D

    L. Brugnera, D. J. Hoffmann, T. Siegel, F. Frank, A. Za¨ ır, J. W. G. Tisch, and J. P. Marangos, Trajectory selection in high harmonic generation by controlling the phase between orthogonal two-color fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 153902 (2011)

    2011

  50. [58]

    S. Park, K. Kim, K. Lee, H. Kim, and C. Nam, Enhanced two-color high-harmonic generation achieved by adding an extra gas medium, Applied Physics B 120, 723 (2015)

    2015

  51. [59]

    C. Jin, G. J. Stein, K.-H. Hong, and C. D. Lin, Generation of bright, spatially coherent soft x-ray high harmonics in a hollow waveguide using two-color synthesized laser pulses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 043901 (2015)

    2015

  52. [60]

    Takahashi, Y

    E. Takahashi, Y. Nabekawa, T. Otsuka, M. Obara, and K. Midorikawa, Generation of highly coherent submicrojoule soft x rays by high-order harmonics, Phys. Rev. A 66, 021802 (2002)

    2002

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.