Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Higher Koszul duality and $n$-affineness

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.16935 v3 pith:VHXWYQXV submitted 2025-03-25 math.AG math.ATmath.CTmath.KT

classification math.AGmath.ATmath.CTmath.KT
keywords koszuldualityaffinenessmathbbbettistackscategoriesequivalence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In this paper we study $\mathbb{E}_n$-Koszul duality in the topological setting, and the closely related question of \emph{$n$-affineness} for Betti stacks. The $\mathbb{E}_n$-Koszul dual of the algebra of chains on the $n$-fold loop space of a space $X$ is the algebra of cochains on $X$. It was expected that $\mathbb{E}_n$-Koszul duality should induce a kind of Morita equivalence between categories of iterated modules, but even the precise formulation of such a statement was not known. We give a rigorous formulation, and a proof, of such an $\mathbb{E}_n$-Koszul duality in the topological setting as an equivalence of $(\infty,n)$-categories. Conceptually, our main innovation is highlighting the coaffine stack defined by the \emph{cospectrum} of $\mathrm{C}^{\bullet}(X;\Bbbk)$ as a key geometric object supporting Koszul duality. Our result is new already in the classical case $n=1$, although it can be seen to recover well known formulations of $\mathbb{E}_1$-Koszul duality as a Morita equivalence of module categories (up to appropriate completions of the $t$-structures). We also investigate (higher) affineness properties of Betti stacks. We give a complete characterization of $n$-affine Betti stacks, in terms of the $0$-affineness of their iterated loop space. As a consequence, we prove that $n$-truncated Betti stacks are $n$-affine; and that $\pi_{n+1}(X)$ is an obstruction to $n$-affineness.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An axiomatic approach to analytic $1$-affineness

    math.AG 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An axiomatic framework proves 1-affineness for analytic Betti stacks, analytic de Rham stacks, and rigid analytic varieties, giving categorical Künneth formulas.

Pith tools