Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Evaluating Learned Query Performance Prediction Models at LinkedIn: Challenges, Opportunities, and Findings

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.17181 v1 pith:DB5EMB6M submitted 2025-04-24 cs.DB

classification cs.DB
keywords modelsperformancequerylinkedinpredictionavailableclassificationdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advancements in learning-based query performance prediction models have demonstrated remarkable efficacy. However, these models are predominantly validated using synthetic datasets focused on cardinality or latency estimations. This paper explores the application of these models to LinkedIn's complex real-world OLAP queries executed on Trino, addressing four primary research questions: (1) How do these models perform on real-world industrial data with limited information? (2) Can these models generalize to new tasks, such as CPU time prediction and classification? (3) What additional information available from the query plan could be utilized by these models to enhance their performance? (4) What are the theoretical performance limits of these models given the available data? To address these questions, we evaluate several models-including TLSTM, TCNN, QueryFormer, and XGBoost, against the industrial query workload at LinkedIn, and extend our analysis to CPU time regression and classification tasks. We also propose a multi-task learning approach to incorporate underutilized operator-level metrics that could enhance model understanding. Additionally, we empirically analyze the inherent upper bound that can be achieved from the models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ScaleSense: Cost-Intelligent Scaling Framework via Learned Resource Estimation in Alibaba AnalyticDB

    cs.DB 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ScaleSense predicts per-query resource and latency quantiles from execution-plan graphs and uses them to choose cost-effective compute configurations, reporting a 76.7% relative improvement in constraint satisfaction ...

Pith tools