Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 41 references

Isolated elliptically-polarized attosecond pulse generation in gapped graphene driven by linearly polarized laser fields

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A two-color field with a linearly polarized fundamental and a 0.7-amplitude second harmonic can synthesize isolated elliptically polarized attosecond pulses from gapped graphene, with simulated FWHM about 740 as for a 0.05 a.u.

desk verdict Competent caustics study with an elegant trajectory model; the two-color IEAP scheme is a plausible but currently unproven conjecture. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.17335 v3 pith:NGJ6BICH submitted 2025-04-24 physics.atom-ph

Xinru Song , Xiaoyu Bu , Xiaohui Zhao , Rongxiang Zhang , Shang Wang , Fulong Dong This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-ph PACS 42.65.Ky42.65.Re78.67.Wj
keywords gappedgraphenehigh-orderharmonicgenerationisolatedellipticallypolarizedattosecondpulsescausticeffectrecombinationtrajectorymodeltwo-colorlaserfieldellipticitytight-bindingapproximation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper's aim is to establish a route to isolated elliptically polarized attosecond pulses (IEAPs) from gapped graphene driven by a short, linearly polarized femtosecond pulse, with the laser-lattice orientation controlling both which harmonics are enhanced and how elliptical they are. It argues that the bright harmonics are a caustic effect—the convergence of long and short electron-hole recombination orbits—and that the orientation dependence reflects the distinct band structures seen by electrons ionized near the two inequivalent $K$ points. It then shows that the ellipticity of individual harmonics is governed by the phase difference between the parallel and perpendicular harmonic components, a phase difference that is accurately predicted by the recombination-trajectory model. On this basis the authors propose a two-color field, fundamental plus second harmonic, designed to select the one trajectory branch whose phase difference is locked near $\pi/2$, and they report IEAPs with FWHM about 740 as for a 0.05 a.u. gap and 645 as for a 0.1 a.u. gap. This is a concrete, simulation-backed recipe for IEAPs that avoids bicircular or polarization-shaping lasers.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the electron-hole recombination trajectory model obtained from the two-band density-matrix equations under the strong-field approximation. Its saddle-point conditions fix the ionization time, recombination time, and emitted harmonic order for each initial crystal momentum, and the Hessian determinant weights the trajectories. Two identities carry the argument: the caustic condition, where long and short orbits converge, which explains which harmonic orders are enhanced; and Eq. (9), which reduces the parallel-perpendicular phase difference to the recombination-time transition-dipole phase difference, $\alpha_\parallel(\mathbf{K}^{tr})-\alpha_\perp(\mathbf{K}^{tr})$. The two-color field of Eq. (10) is the waveform-engineering step, designed to amplify branch B3 and suppress branches B1, B2, and B4 so that only the phase-locked branch contributes to the synthesized pulse.

What would settle it

Run the same two-band density-matrix simulation while sweeping the second-harmonic amplitude in Eq. (10) from about 0.3 to 1.0 at a 30-degree orientation for both gaps; if the ellipticity of harmonics 30-53 drops below about 0.5 because the competing trajectory classes are not suppressed, or if the synthesized pulse splits into multiple attosecond bursts, the central scheme fails. A direct experiment would be polarization-resolved HHG from a gapped monolayer driven by a 4000-nm fundamental plus a 2000-nm second harmonic at the same relative amplitude and orientation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the ellipticity of the enhanced harmonics in gapped graphene is set by the phase difference between the parallel and perpendicular emission, and at a 30-degree orientation this phase difference for trajectory branch B3 is locked near $\pi/2$ across harmonics H30-H53. In the recombination-trajectory model the phase difference reduces at the saddle point to the transition-dipole phase difference at recombination, $\delta = \alpha_\parallel(\mathbf{K}^{tr})-\alpha_\perp(\mathbf{K}^{tr})$ (Eq. (9)), and the enhanced harmonic orders are explained by the caustic effect, where long and short orbits converge. The proposed two-color field, $F'(t)=F_0 f(t)[\cos(\omega_0 t)-0.7\cos(2\omega_0 t)]$ (Eq. (10)), is intended to select branch B3 and suppress the others; in the density-matrix simulations it yields harmonic ellipticity around 0.5 for $\Delta_g=0.05$ a.u. and in the 0.5-0.9 range for $\Delta_g=0.1$ a.u., and synthesized pulses with FWHM near 740 as and 645 as, respectively.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that adding a second harmonic with 0.7 times the fundamental amplitude actually isolates the one class of electron trajectories whose emission has a stable quarter-cycle phase difference, while suppressing all other trajectory classes; the paper states this as a design goal rather than deriving it or scanning the amplitude.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At a 30-degree orientation, the parallel-perpendicular phase difference for branch B3 remains near $\pi/2$ from H30 to H53, so ellipticity is limited mainly by the amplitude ratio, not by phase instability.
  • The two-color field of Eq. (10) synthesizes isolated elliptically polarized attosecond pulses with FWHM roughly 740 as for $\Delta_g=0.05$ a.u. and 645 as for $\Delta_g=0.1$ a.u.
  • For the larger gap, perpendicular and parallel harmonic yields become comparable, raising harmonic ellipticity into the 0.5-0.9 range and the synthesized pulse ellipticity to about 0.5.
  • Keeping the driving field linearly polarized means the scheme needs no bicircular or polarization-shaping lasers, only crystal orientation plus a weak second harmonic.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the branch-selection mechanism is robust, the same recipe should transfer to monolayer transition-metal dichalcogenides with gaps near 0.05-0.1 a.u., since the mechanism requires only inequivalent $K$ points and a dipole-phase landscape with a phase difference locked near $\pi/2$; a TMD simulation would test this directly.
  • Sweeping the second-harmonic amplitude around 0.7 could map how sharply the branch selection cuts in and may identify settings with even higher ellipticity or shorter pulses; the paper reports no such scan.
  • Equation (9) points to a general design rule: search crystal orientation and band-structure parameters for regions where the dipole-phase difference is stationary near $\pi/2$, then use waveform synthesis to isolate that branch, a strategy not limited to graphene.
  • For the smaller gap, the amplitude imbalance rather than the phase limits the ellipticity, so enlarging the gap or shifting the harmonic window may push the synthesized pulse closer to circular polarization.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports simulations of high-order harmonic generation (HHG) in gapped graphene driven by linearly polarized few-cycle laser pulses, using two-band density-matrix equations in the tight-binding approximation. It identifies orientation-dependent enhanced harmonics, attributes them to a caustic effect, and develops a saddle-point recombination-trajectory model that predicts the phase difference between the parallel and perpendicular harmonic components. The authors then propose a two-color field, fundamental plus second harmonic with amplitude 0.7, to selectively amplify one recombination branch and synthesize isolated elliptically polarized attosecond pulses. They report synthesized pulses with FWHM of approximately 740 as and 645 as, and ellipticities of about 0.2 and 0.5, for gaps of 0.05 a.u. and 0.1 a.u., respectively.

Significance. If the central proposal is established, the paper offers a concrete, simulation-backed route to elliptically polarized attosecond pulses from a two-dimensional material without sophisticated polarization-control schemes. The caustic interpretation and the phase-difference formula Eq. (9) provide a useful analytical framework, and the TBDME simulations are standard and internally consistent. The paper also gives explicit, falsifiable predictions for harmonic ellipticities and pulse durations. However, the Sec. IV IEAP proposal is not yet demonstrated as claimed: the branch-selection mechanism is assumed rather than verified, and the term 'isolated' is supported only by a FWHM value, not by a temporal-contrast analysis. These gaps are addressable within the scope of a revision.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. IV, Eq. (10)] The IEAP scheme rests on the assumption that the two-color field with second-harmonic amplitude 0.7 selectively amplifies recombination branch B3 while suppressing B1, B2, and B4. The paper states this as a design goal ('if the laser field can be engineered to selectively amplify...') but provides no branch-resolved analysis. Figure 6 shows only the final harmonic ellipticity and spectra for q=30-53; there is no decomposition of the harmonic yield by branch, and the saddle-point equations (8) are not solved for the two-color field of Eq. (10). Uniform ellipticity over this harmonic range could in principle arise from a superposition of several branches. I request a branch-resolved analysis of the two-color-field harmonics and a robustness scan of the 0.7 coefficient to establish the claimed selective-amplification mechanism.
  2. [Sec. IV, Fig. 6(c) and 6(f)] The word 'isolated' is not supported by the presented evidence. The synthesized field is a sum of discrete harmonics q=30-53 and is therefore periodic; quoting only a FWHM of 740/645 as does not exclude a multi-burst train. The paper should show the full temporal envelope of the synthesized parallel and perpendicular components over several laser cycles, together with a contrast ratio or a time gate, to demonstrate that a single attosecond burst is produced rather than a few-cycle train.
  3. [Sec. III.C, Eq. (9) and Fig. 5] The claimed predictive accuracy of Eq. (9) should be calibrated against the fact that the model and the TBDME simulations share the same tight-binding Hamiltonian. The agreement, e.g., 0.06 versus 0.07 rad for H40 and 0.45 versus 0.33 rad for H32 at theta=15 degrees, demonstrates internal consistency but not independent validation. The 0.12 rad discrepancy at H32 is non-negligible and should be discussed, quantified over a broader set of harmonics, or traced to a specific approximation (e.g., the neglect of the Hessian prefactor in Eq. (6)).
minor comments (5)
  1. [References] References [10] and [26] are the same paper (Dong, Xia, and Liu, Phys. Rev. A 104, 033119 (2021)); one of the two citations should be removed or replaced with a different work.
  2. [Fig. 6(c), 6(f)] The horizontal axis of the synthesized-pulse panels is not described in the text; please specify the time scale and indicate whether the plotted window covers one optical cycle or several cycles.
  3. [Eq. (10)] The negative sign of the second-harmonic term in Eq. (10) is not motivated; a sentence explaining the relative phase between the two colors would clarify the design.
  4. [Sec. II.A] The envelope f(t)=sin^2(omega0 t/2n) with n=3 should be described by its total pulse duration in optical cycles; currently only the functional form is given.
  5. [Notation] The symbol epsilon is used both for ellipticity (Eq. (4)) and for band energies epsilon_c, epsilon_v; this is potentially confusing and a different symbol for one of the quantities would help.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the phase-difference formula is a saddle-point consequence of the same Hamiltonian and the two-color proposal is a design, not a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central analytic result, Eq. (9), is derived by subtracting the semiclassical actions for the parallel and perpendicular interband currents, leaving only the dipole-phase difference α_||(K_tr) − α_⊥(K_tr). This is a parameter-free consequence of the same two-band tight-binding Hamiltonian that is integrated numerically, so the agreement in Fig. 5 is a self-consistency check of the saddle-point approximation rather than a circular reduction of a predicted quantity to an input. The ellipticity values are not fit parameters, and no derivation step assumes the numerical result it is supposed to explain. The two-color scheme in Eq. (10) is explicitly introduced as a design: 'we design a two-color (fundamental plus second-harmonic) field scheme', and the choice 0.7 is not claimed to be independently predicted. Whether this coefficient is robust or whether branch B3 is truly isolated is a correctness and validation concern, not a definitional circularity. The self-citations to Refs. [10] and [37] supply context and standard saddle-point techniques, but the load-bearing phase-difference comparison uses the paper's own formula and numerics, so these citations are not load-bearing in the circularity sense. Overall, no claimed output is equivalent to its input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claims rest on a standard but idealized two-band tight-binding model with hand-set parameters (dephasing rate, excitation threshold, second-harmonic amplitude). The analytical recombination model is derived from the same Hamiltonian as the numerical simulation, so its agreement with the numerics is an internal consistency check rather than an independent validation. There are no experimental benchmarks and no new entities postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • Dephasing rate 1/T2 = 0.01 a.u.
    Set in Sec. II A; this phenomenological scattering rate controls spectral broadening and harmonic yield, and is not independently determined.
  • Excitation energy threshold ε_i = 0.1 a.u. (for Δg = 0.05 a.u.)
    Set in Sec. III A for the recombination model; it selects which saddle-point trajectories are counted, and no value is stated for the Δg = 0.1 a.u. case.
  • Second-harmonic amplitude in Eq. (10) = 0.7
    Chosen in Sec. IV to gate branch B3 and suppress others; no justification or optimization is provided.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Tight-binding nearest-neighbor Hamiltonian for gapped graphene accurately describes the electronic bands and transition dipoles.
    Invoked in Sec. II A; the two-band dispersion ε_c(k) = sqrt(γ0^2 |f(k)|^2 + Δg^2/4) underlies all simulations and the trajectory model.
  • domain assumption The two-band density-matrix equations in the Houston representation, with a phenomenological dephasing rate 1/T2 = 0.01 a.u., capture HHG from the real material.
    Used throughout Sec. II; the dephasing is chosen by hand and is not derived from first principles.
  • standard math The saddle-point approximation is valid and the Hessian determinant contributes no significant phase to the harmonic ellipticity.
    Eqs. (6)-(9); the phase difference reduces to α_‖(K_tr) - α_⊥(K_tr), dropping any phase from the Hessian prefactor.
  • domain assumption Caustic enhancement occurs when the long and short recombination trajectories merge, dω/dti = 0.
    Borrowed from Refs. [41,42] and applied in Sec. III B as the explanation for the enhanced harmonic branches.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Isolated elliptically-polarized attosecond pulse generation in gapped graphene driven by linearly polarized laser fields." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NGJ6BICH

@misc{pith2026250417335,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Isolated elliptically-polarized attosecond pulse generation in gapped graphene driven by linearly polarized laser fields},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NGJ6BICH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.17335}
}
abstract

We theoretically investigate high-order harmonic generation (HHG) and its ellipticity in gapped graphene, driven by a femtosecond short-pulse laser at various orientation angles, employing the two-band density-matrix equations within the tight-binding approximation. The orientation-dependent harmonic spectra exhibit pronounced enhancement of specific harmonics, which we attribute to the caustic effect. Using the recombination trajectory model, we reveal that the orientation dependence of these enhanced harmonics originates from the distinct band structures encountered by electrons ionized from the two inequivalent $\textrm{K}$ points. Moreover, we focus on the ellipticity of the enhanced harmonics at specific angles and demonstrate that it primarily depends on the phase difference between the parallel and perpendicular components, which can be accurately predicted by our recombination trajectory model. Based on these insights, we propose a two-color (fundamental plus second-harmonic) field scheme to generate isolated elliptically polarized attosecond pulses (IEAPs) in gapped graphene. Our findings may provide a promising pathway toward the generation of IEAPs in gapped graphene or transition metal dichalcogenides.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.17335 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Hexagonal lattice structure of gapped [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Total harmonic intensity as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Time-frequency distribution of the total curr [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Same as Fig. 3, but for orientation angles of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) Harmonic ellipticity as a function of the ori [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [37]

    F. Dong, Q. Xia, and J. Liu, Caustic effects on high- order harmonic generation in graphene, Phys. Rev. A 109, L041102(2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    X. F. Li, A. L’Huillier, M. Ferray, L. A. Lompre, and G. Mainfray, Multiple-harmonic generation in rare gases at high laser intensity, Phys. Rev. A 39, 5751 (1989)

    work page 1989

  3. [2]

    P. B. Corkum, Plasma perspective on strong field multi- photon ionization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1994 (1993)

    1993

  4. [3]

    Lewenstein, Ph

    M. Lewenstein, Ph. Balcou, M. Yu. Ivanov, A. L’Huillier, and P. B. Corkum, Theory of high-harmonic generation by low-frequency laser fields, Phys. Rev. A 49, 2117 (1994)

    work page 1994

  5. [4]

    Krauzs and M

    F. Krauzs and M. Ivanov, Attosecond physics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 163 (2009)

    work page 2009

  6. [5]

    Ghimire, A

    S. Ghimire, A. D. DiChiara, E. Sistrunk, P. Agostini, L. F. DiMauro, and D. A. Reis, Observation of high-order harmonic generation in a bulk crystal, Nat. Phys. 7, 138 (2011)

    2011

  7. [6]

    T. T. Luu, M. Garg, S. Yu. Kruchinin, A. Moulet, M. Th. Hassan, and E. Goulielmakis, Extreme ultraviolet high-harmonic spectroscopy of solids, Nature 521, 498 (2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [7]

    Heide, Y

    C. Heide, Y. Kobayashi, A. C. Johnson, T. F. Heinz, D. A. Reis, F. Liu and S. Ghimire, High-harmonic genera- tion from artificially stacked 2D crystals, Nanophotonics 12, 255 (2023)

    work page 2023

Show all 41 references
  1. [8]

    Kaneshima, Y

    K. Kaneshima, Y. Shinohara, K. Takeuchi, N. Ishii, K. Imasaka, T. Kaji, S. Ashihara, K. L. Ishikawa, and J. Itatani, Polarization-resolved study of high harmonics from bulk semiconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 243903 (2018)

    2018

  2. [9]

    Yoshikawa, T

    N. Yoshikawa, T. Tamaya, and K. Tanaka, High- harmonic generation in graphene enhanced by elliptically polarized light excitation, Science 356, 736 (2017)

    2017

  3. [11]

    H. K. Kelardeh, U. Saalmann, and J. M. Rost, Ultra- short laser-driven dynamics of massless Dirac electrons generating valley polarization in graphene, Phys. Rev. Research 4, L022014 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    Dong, and J

    F. Dong, and J. Liu, Knee structure in the laser-intensi ty dependence of harmonic generation for graphene, Phys. Rev. A 106, 043103 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    Yue and M

    L. Yue and M. B. Gaarde, Imperfect recollisions in high- harmonic generation in solids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 153204 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    F. Dong, J. Yan, and X. Song, Tunneling displacement of electron-hole pairs in high-order harmonic generation for monolayer hexagonal boron nitride, Phys. Rev. A 110, 043104 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    H. Z. Liu, Y. L. Li, Y. S. You, S. Ghimire, T. F. Heinz, and D. A. Reis, High-harmonic generation from an atom- ically thin semiconductor, Nat. Phys. 13, 262 (2017)

    2017

  8. [16]

    Yoshikawa, K

    N. Yoshikawa, K. Nagai, K. Uchida, Y. Takaguchi, S. Sasaki, Y. Miyata, and K. Tanaka, Interband resonant high-harmonic generation by valley polarized electron- hole pairs, Nat. Commun. 10, 3709 (2019)

    2019

  9. [17]

    Langer, M

    F. Langer, M. Hohenleutner, U. Huttner, S. W. Koch, M. Kira, and R. Huber, Symmetry-controlled temporal structure of high-harmonic carrier fields from a bulk crys- tal, Nat. Photonics 11, 227 (2017)

    2017

  10. [18]

    B¨ owering, T

    N. B¨ owering, T. Lischke, B. Schmidtke, N. M¨ uller, T. Khalil, and U. Heinzmann, Asymmetry in photoelectron emission from chiral molecules induced by circularly po- larized light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1187 (2001)

    2001

  11. [19]

    Ferr´ e, C

    A. Ferr´ e, C. Handschin, M. Dumergue, F. Burgy, A. Comby, D. Descamps, B. Fabre, G. A. Garcia, R. G´ eneaux, L. Merceron, E. M´ evel, L. Nahon, S. Petit, B. Pons, D. Staedter, S. Weber, T. Ruchon, V. Blanchet, and Y. Mairesse, A table-top ultrashort light source in the extrem...

    2015

  12. [20]

    K. J. Yuan and A. D. Bandrauk, Single Circularly Polar- ized Attosecond Pulse Generation by Intense Few Cycle Elliptically Polarized Laser Pulses and Terahertz Fields from Molecular Media, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 023003 (2013)

    2013

  13. [21]

    Mediˇsauskas, J

    L. Mediˇsauskas, J. Wragg, H. Hart, and M. Y. Ivanov, Generating Isolated Elliptically Polarized Attosecond Pulses Using Bichromatic Counterrotating Circularly Po- larized Laser Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 153001 (2015)

    2015

  14. [22]

    Zhong, B

    C. Zhong, B. Qiao, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang, X. Li, J. Wang, C. Zhou, S. Zhu and X. He, Production of intense iso- lated attosecond pulses with circular polarization by us- ing counter propagating relativistic lasers, New J. Phys. 23, 063080 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    W. Li, X. Zhu, P. Lan, and P. Lu, Elliptically polarized attosecond pulse generation by corotating bicircular lase r fields, Phys. Rev. A 106, 043115 (2022). 8

    2022

  16. [24]

    H. Du, L. Luo, X. Wang, and B. Hu, Generating isolated elliptically polarized attosecond pulses from oriented CO gas medium using linearly polarized driving pulses, Phys. Rev. A 86, 013846 (2012)

    2012

  17. [25]

    F. L. Dong, Y. Q. Tian, S. J. Yu, S. Wang, S. P. Yang, and Y. J. Chen, Polarization properties of below- threshold harmonics from aligned molecules H + 2 in lin- early polarized laser fields, Opt. Express 23, 18106 (2015)

    2015

  18. [26]

    F. Dong, Q. Xia, and J. Liu, Ellipticity of the harmonic emission from graphene irradiated by a linearly polarized laser, Phys. Rev. A 104, 033119 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    Mahieu, S

    B. Mahieu, S. Stremoukhov, D. Gauthier, C. Spezzani, C. Alves, B. Vodungbo, P. Zeitoun, V. Malka, G. De Ninno, and G. Lambert, Control of ellipticity in high-order har- monic generation driven by two linearly polarized fields, Phys. Rev. A 97, 043857 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    T. T. Luu and H. J. W¨ orner, Measurement of the Berry curvature of solids using high-harmonic spectroscopy, Nat. Commun. 9, 916 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    Yue and M

    L. Yue and M. B. Gaarde, Characterizing anomalous high-Harmonic generation in solids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 166903 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    A. J. Uzan-Narovlansky, L. Faeyrman, G. G. Brown, S. Shames, V. Narovlansky, J. Xiao, T. Arusi-Parpar, O. Kneller, B. D. Bruner, O. Smirnova, R. E. F. Silva, B. Yan, ´A. Jim´ enez-Gal´ an, M. Ivanov, and N. Dudovich, Observation of interband Berry phase in laser-driven crystal...

    2024

  23. [31]

    K. F. Mak, C. Lee, J. Hone, J. Shan, and T. F. Heinz, Atomically thin MoS 2 : a new direct-gap semiconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 136805 (2010)

    2010

  24. [32]

    R. Lv, J. A. Robinson, R. E. Schaak, D. Sun, Y. Sun, T. E. Mallouk, and M. Terrones, Transition metal dichalco- genides and beyond: synthesis, properties, and appli- cations of single- and few-layer nanosheets, Acc. Chem. Res. 48, 56 (2015)

    2015

  25. [33]

    W. V. Houston, Acceleration of electrons in a crystal lattice, Phys. Rev. 57, 184 (1940)

    1940

  26. [34]

    Vampa, C

    G. Vampa, C. R. McDonald, G. Orlando, D. D. Klug, P. B. Corkum, and T. Brabec, Theoretical analysis of high-harmonic generation in solids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 073901 (2014)

    2014

  27. [35]

    S. C. Jiang, H. Wei, J. G. Chen, C. Yu, R. F. Lu, and C. D. Lin, Effect of transition dipole phase on high-order harmonic generation in solid materials, Phys. Rev. A 96, 053850 (2017)

    2017

  28. [36]

    S. K. Son, D. A. Telnov, and S. I. Chu, Probing the origin of elliptical high-order harmonic generation from aligned molecules in linearly polarized laser fields, Phys. Rev. A 82, 043829 (2010)

    2010

  29. [38]

    Kolesik, Determining the electronic states that con - tribute most to solid-state high-order harmonic radiation , Phys

    M. Kolesik, Determining the electronic states that con - tribute most to solid-state high-order harmonic radiation , Phys. Rev. A 109, 023503 (2024)

    2024

  30. [39]

    Yue and M

    L. Yue and M. B. Gaarde, Expanded view of electron-hole recollisions in solid-state high-order harmonic generati on: Full-Brillouin-zone tunneling and imperfect recollision s, Phys. Rev. A 103, 063105 (2021)

    2021

  31. [40]

    J. Chen, Q. Xia, and L. Fu, Spectral caustics of high- order harmonics in one-dimensional periodic crystals, Opt. Lett. 46, 2248 (2021)

    2021

  32. [41]

    O. Raz, O. Pedatzur, B. D. Bruner, and N. Dudovich, Spectral caustics in attosecond science, Nat. Photonics 6, 170 (2012)

    2012

  33. [42]

    Faccial` a, S

    D. Faccial` a, S. Pabst, B. D. Bruner, A. G. Ciriolo, S. De Silvestri, M. Devetta, M. Negro, H. Soifer, S. Stagira, N. Dudovich, and C. Vozzi, Probe of Multielectron Dy- namics in Xenon by Caustics in High-Order Harmonic Generation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 093902 (2016). [† ] ph...

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.