Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 59 references

Fast and accurate modelling of Kerr-Brillouin combs in Fabry-Perot resonators

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Starting from three coupled wave equations, this paper derives one mean-field envelope equation that reproduces Kerr-Brillouin frequency combs down to 150 dB below the carrier and runs up to four orders of magnitude faster.

desk verdict A clean extension of the Fabry-Perot LLE with a nonlocal Brillouin response that matches coupled-wave simulations across extreme comb regimes; the main gap is missing code, not the physics. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.17657 v2 pith:ACEEWH3B submitted 2025-04-24 physics.optics nlin.PS

Matteo Conforti , Thomas Bunel , Auro M. Perego , Arnaud Mussot This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsnlin.PS PACS 42.65.Es42.65.Ky42.60.Da
keywords Kerr-BrillouinfrequencycombsFabry-PerotresonatorsstimulatedBrillouinscatteringKerrnonlinearitymean-fieldmodelnonlocalresponsecoupledwaveequationssplit-stepFouriermethod
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper derives a single mean-field partial differential equation, Eq. (48), that describes a Fabry-Perot resonator whose medium responds with both Kerr and Brillouin nonlinearities. It starts from the three coupled wave equations for the forward and backward optical fields and the acoustic wave, and eliminates the acoustic variable through a nonlocal response function. The authors show that the resulting equation reproduces broadband Kerr-Brillouin frequency combs generated by cascaded stimulated Brillouin scattering and four-wave mixing, with spectral agreement down to 150 dB below the main line and computation times up to four orders of magnitude shorter than the coupled-wave benchmark. The same equation yields an explicit growth-rate formula for harmonic perturbations, which explains how the comb's line spacing is selected by the combined Kerr-Brillouin gain rather than simply by the cavity free-spectral range. If correct, this gives researchers a fast and interpretable tool for designing combs in which Brillouin scattering is used as a feature rather than avoided.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is Eq. (48), a single mean-field envelope equation for the backward field in a Fabry-Perot resonator, written as a driven, damped nonlinear Schr\"odinger-type equation with a nonlocal Brillouin convolution. The derivation rests on a modal expansion: forward and backward fields share one set of cavity-mode amplitudes $a_n(t)$, and the acoustic wave is eliminated through the frequency-domain response $H_B(\omega)=\Omega_B\Gamma_B/(\Omega_B^2-\omega^2-i\omega\Gamma_B)$, whose inverse Fourier transform, periodically replicated, forms the spatial kernel $h_B(z)$ of the convolution in Eq. (48). This kernel does the work of the acoustic equation: it converts the Brillouin cascade into a single nonlocal term that can be evaluated by FFT within a split-step Fourier integrator, and it makes the stability calculation a $2\times2$ matrix problem.

What would settle it

A concrete check: simulate the same high-finesse cavity of Table I but reduce the mirror reflectivities so that the finesse drops to about 20, keep the same pump power and detuning, and compare the spectra produced by Eq. (48) and by the full coupled wave equations. If the comb lines beyond the first Brillouin sideband no longer match, the slow-amplitude / good-cavity premise is the controlling assumption; if they still match, the equation is more robust than the derivation suggests.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the full coupled-wave description of stimulated Brillouin scattering plus the Kerr effect in a high-finesse Fabry-Perot cavity—two counter-propagating optical envelopes together with a damped acoustic oscillator—reduces, under the mean-field limit, to a single evolution equation for one envelope, Eq. (48). The Brillouin contribution appears as a nonlocal convolution with a kernel $h_B$ built from the response $H_B(\omega)=\Omega_B\Gamma_B/(\Omega_B^2-\omega^2-i\omega\Gamma_B)$, so every Stokes and anti-Stokes order of the SBS cascade is generated without tracking the acoustic wave as a separate variable. The authors demonstrate numerically that this one equation reproduces the coupled-wave spectra in fiber Fabry-Perot resonators—down to 150 dB below the primary line, including combs spanning more than 20 THz—and that it runs 2,000 to 9,600 times faster than the coupled-wave solver in their examples. They also derive from Eq. (48) a compact linear-stability growth rate for harmonic perturbations, Eq. (59), that identifies which cavity modes are excited by the combined Kerr-Brillouin gain.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on the premise that the cavity-mode amplitudes change slowly over one round trip (high mirror reflectivity, weak nonlinearity, weak dispersion), so that second time derivatives and rapidly oscillating terms can be dropped from the modal equations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The reported examples reduce runtime from 140 minutes to 3.7 seconds (about 2000x), from 1327 minutes to 10.4 seconds (about 8000x), and from 6716 minutes to 42 seconds (about 9600x).
  • The linear-stability formula gives the gain of each cavity mode directly, so the dominant sideband spacing (nine times the free-spectral range in the examples) can be predicted from parameters, not only from full simulation.
  • Because the derivation includes group-velocity dispersion of either sign, the model covers both normal-dispersion switching-wave combs and the anomalous-dispersion soliton combs that are standard in Kerr resonators.
  • The equation resolves SBS cascades to all orders in a single convolution, so it can describe combs where the pure Brillouin gain peak would fall between cavity resonances yet comb generation still occurs through the joint Kerr-Brillouin gain.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same elimination-by-convolution should extend to any delayed nonlinearity in a Fabry-Perot cavity—Raman scattering, thermal nonlinearities—by substituting the appropriate response kernel; the paper itself treats only the Brillouin case.
  • The growth-rate formula suggests a practical tuning knob: by choosing detuning and pump power, the Kerr-broadened Brillouin lobe can be moved across cavity modes, making the comb repetition rate selectable in integer steps of the free-spectral range.
  • The slow-amplitude assumption is the boundary of validity; a quantitative criterion (for instance, finesse times comb bandwidth relative to the Brillouin frequency) would be the natural next test, and can be checked by low-finesse comparisons against the coupled-wave equations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a mean-field model for Fabry-Perot resonators with both Kerr and Brillouin nonlinearities. Starting from the coupled wave equations (CWE) for the forward and backward optical fields and the acoustic wave, the authors perform a modal expansion, project onto cavity modes, and under the good-cavity/slow-amplitude assumptions obtain a single integro-differential equation, Eq. (48), with a nonlocal Brillouin response. They derive steady-state curves, a Brillouin gain spectrum, and a linear stability analysis yielding a perturbation growth rate. The model is then validated numerically against the original CWE for three operating points, including a 20 THz comb, with reported speedups between 2000 and 9600 times.

Significance. If the result holds, this is a useful and potentially influential contribution: it provides a compact Lugiato-Lefever-type description of Kerr-Brillouin comb generation that is amenable to standard split-step Fourier solvers and to analytical stability analysis. The derivation from the prior coupled-wave framework of Dong and Winful is a genuine strength, as is the numerical comparison over a wide dynamic range (agreement to about 150 dB below the pump line) and the reduction of the growth-rate formula to the pure Brillouin gain in the appropriate limit. The claimed computational speedup is very attractive, but it currently rests on unpublished implementation details rather than on a released code or reproducible benchmark. The central physical derivation is plausible, but the printed equations contain an internal inconsistency in the dispersion term that must be resolved before the manuscript can be considered self-consistent.

major comments (2)
  1. [III.B, Eq. (48) vs. Eq. (43); IV, Eqs. (55) and (59)] The GVD term is not self-consistent across the printed equations. From Eq. (43), the linear dispersive term is -i beta2/(2 beta1) omega_n^2 a_n. Multiplying by Tr = 2 beta1 L and summing against e^{-i beta1 omega_n z}, and using d^2 psi/dz^2 = -beta1^2 sum omega_n^2 a_n e^{-i beta1 omega_n z}, gives a contribution +i L beta2/beta1^2 d^2 psi/dz^2 to Eq. (48). The printed Eq. (48) instead has -i L beta2/beta1^2 d^2 psi/dz^2; the sign would be consistent only if Eq. (43) contained +i beta2/(2 beta1) omega_n^2 a_n. There is also a factor-of-two discrepancy: Eq. (55), with d2 = beta2/beta1^3, yields a modal contribution D = (d2/2) Tr k_n^2 = L beta2 omega_n^2, whereas Eq. (59) contains 2 L beta2 omega_n^2. All of Eqs. (43), (48), (55), and (59) cannot be simultaneously correct; at least one is misprinted. Since the numerical comparisons in Figs. 3-5 are very close, it appears that the implemented equation differs from at least one printed version, and the manuscript should be corrected so that the derivation is internally consistent and reproducible from the displayed equations alone.
  2. [Section V, Figs. 3-5 and the speedup claims] The headline quantitative claim, namely speedups of about 2000, 8000, and 9600 relative to the CWE solver, rests entirely on the authors' implementations. No simulation code, input parameter files, or benchmark scripts are provided, and the only implementation details are the brief description of the split-step/FFT method for Eq. (48) and the predictor-corrector characteristic scheme for the CWE. A reader cannot verify that the two solvers are equally converged, what time steps and spatial grids were used for each case, how the runtime comparison was made, or what hardware and compiler were used. This is an evidentiary gap for a central performance claim. I ask the authors to provide a reproducibility statement with either released code or, at minimum, a detailed benchmark report including convergence tests in dt and dz for both solvers and the criterion used to declare the spectra matched.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction] There is a typo in 'unfiorm- or mean-field limit' in the introduction; it should read 'uniform-field or mean-field limit'.
  2. [Section V, Fig. 4] The text and caption report '8092 spatial modes' for Fig. 4; this is presumably a typo for 8192 (2^13).
  3. [Eq. (60)] The sentence 'Equation (60) represents a double Lorentzian, with maximum gain (absorption) at negative (postitive) frequency shift ∓Omega_B' is confusingly worded; it should state explicitly that the gain maximum is at omega = -Omega_B and the absorption maximum at omega = +Omega_B.
  4. [Eq. (48) and Eq. (49)] The notation in the Brillouin term of Eq. (48) is ambiguous because the symbol * is used both for complex conjugation and for convolution; the two should be clearly distinguished, and the argument of the convolution should be written explicitly.
  5. [Section VI] The phrase 'as seldom done in nonlinear fiber optics devices' in the conclusion is awkward; consider rewording to 'which is rarely done' or similar.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Eq. (48) is derived from the prior coupled-wave model [51] and independently validated against it; the self-citations are contextual, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central result, Eq. (48), is obtained by an explicit derivation from the coupled wave equations (1)-(3), which are attributed to Dong and Winful [51]. The derivation chain is shown in the text: modal expansions (29)-(30) and (34), projection onto cavity modes, the slow-amplitude approximation, and the summation over modes leading to the mean-field equation. No fitted parameter is later relabeled as a prediction; the stability growth rate in Eq. (59) is computed analytically from the derived equation, and the reduction to the Brillouin gain (60) is checked against the independently derived gain (16)-(18). The numerical agreement reported in Figs. 3-5 is a comparison between the new model and the original coupled-wave equations, not a consequence of the model being constructed from its own output. The self-references to the authors' prior work, Refs. [27] and [49], are used as context and as a methodological template, but the essential algebra is reproduced in Sections III.A-III.B, so those citations do not carry the load of the derivation. The main limitations are the standard mean-field assumptions (high finesse, weak nonlinearity, slow modal amplitudes), which are stated explicitly, and the absence of released code for independent reproduction of the speedup figures; these are evidentiary or reproducibility concerns, not circularity. Overall, no step reduces by construction to its input, so the circularity score is minimal.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model introduces no new free parameters: all coefficients (γ, β2, gB, ΩB, ΓB, Aeff, mirror reflectivities, detuning) are physical inputs from prior experiments or standard fiber values. The axioms are the standard mean-field assumptions used to reduce the coupled wave equations, plus the physical model for SBS. No new entities are postulated; the acoustic wave Q and the Brillouin response h_B are derived from the existing CWE. The main burden is inherited from the CWE model and from the slow-variation assumption.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The coupled wave equations (1)-(3) from Dong and Winful [51] accurately describe Kerr and Brillouin nonlinear interactions and the acoustic field in the fiber.
    The entire mean-field derivation starts from these equations; any omitted physics (e.g., phonon propagation, thermal effects) is inherited by the reduced model.
  • domain assumption The cavity operates in the good-cavity / mean-field limit: ρ1,2→1, θ1,2→0, δ→0, ν→0, with dispersion and nonlinearity treated as first-order corrections.
    Invoked in Section III A to simplify boundary conditions and field transformations before deriving Eq. (43); the validity of the model depends on this limit.
  • domain assumption The acoustic envelope Q(z,t) is heavily damped and has no spatial propagation, so Eq. (3) contains no spatial derivatives.
    This limits the Brillouin response to a local-in-time Lorentzian; stated in Section II as 'phonons... heavily dampened'.
  • domain assumption The cross-phase modulation coefficient is X=2, the standard value for single-mode fibers.
    Taken from Refs. [48,54] in Section II; changes to X would alter the stability boundaries and the steady-state response.
  • domain assumption The modal amplitudes a_n(t) vary slowly on the round-trip timescale, so |ȧ_n| << |ω_n a_n|.
    Explicitly assumed in Section III A just before Eq. (43); this is the main mathematical premise that lets fast oscillations be averaged out.
  • standard math The eigenmodes of the lossless empty cavity form a complete basis for expanding f and b, and nonlinear interactions are projected onto these modes.
    Used in Section III A to convert PDEs into coupled ODEs; standard Fourier analysis on the interval [-L,L].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fast and accurate modelling of Kerr-Brillouin combs in Fabry-Perot resonators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ACEEWH3B

@misc{pith2026250417657,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fast and accurate modelling of Kerr-Brillouin combs in Fabry-Perot resonators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ACEEWH3B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.17657}
}
read the original abstract

We introduce a new mean-field equation for modeling Fabry-Perot resonators filled with a dispersive medium exhibiting both Brillouin and Kerr nonlinearities, e.g. an optical fiber. This model is derived from a unified framework that accounts for Brillouin scattering and four-wave mixing. It involves two coupled nonlinear Schr\"odinger equations for the forward and backward propagating fields, alongside a single equation governing the acoustic oscillation. Under the standard assumptions for the mean-field approach (high finesse, weak nonlinearity, and weak dispersion) we demonstrate that our model closely matches the original system. The simplified and elegant mathematical structure of our equation provides valuable physical insights. As a key example, we derive an expression for the growth rate of harmonic perturbations to the steady states. Additionally, our model facilitates fast and accurate numerical simulations using standard Fourier split-step methods. We highlight the effectiveness of this approach by simulating frequency comb generation in state-of-the-art high-Q fiber Fabry-Perot resonators.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.17657 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Scheme of the FP resonator considered in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Steady state curves for CWE Eq. (12) (solid blue [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) False color plot of intracavity power of backward [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. As in Fig. 3. In panel (b) and (d) only the spectral [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [27]

    Dynamic Interplay Between Kerr Combs and Brillouin Lasing in Fiber Cavities

    E. Lucas, M. Deroh, and B. Kibler, Dynamic Inter- play Between Kerr Combs and Brillouin Lasing in Fiber Cavities, Laser and Photonics Reviews 17, 1 (2022), arXiv:2212.08534

    work page Pith review arXiv 2022

  2. [1]

    We now expand the perturbation over the cavity modes with time-varying amplitudes: η(z,t ) =ε+ n (t)eiknz + (ε− n )∗(t)e−iknz. (56) For n̸= 0, the amplitudes of the modal perturbations obey Tr ˙ε+ n =− (α +iδ)ε+ n +id2 2 Trk2 nε+ n + 2iγPsL[(2 +X)ε+ n +ε− n +X(ε+ n +ε− n )δn0] + 2iγBPsL[(ε+ n +ε− n )δn0 +ε+ n ΩB ΓB H∗ B(ωn)], (57) Tr ˙ε− n =− (α−iδ)ε− n−i...

    work page

  3. [2]

    Pasquazi, M

    A. Pasquazi, M. Peccianti, L. Razzari, D. J. Moss, S. Coen, M. Erkintalo, Y. K. Chembo, T. Hans- son, S. Wabnitz, P. Del, X. Xue, A. M. Weiner, and R. Morandotti, Micro-combs: A novel generation of op- tical sources, Physics Reports 729, 1 (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [3]

    S. A. Diddams, K. Vahala, and T. Udem, Optical fre- quency combs: Coherently uniting the electromagnetic spectrum, Science 369, 10.1126/science.aay3676 (2020)

    doi:10.1126/science.aay3676 2020

  5. [4]

    T. Herr, V. Brasch, J. D. Jost, C. Y. Wang, N. M. Kon- dratiev, M. L. Gorodetsky, and T. J. Kippenberg, Tempo- ral solitons in optical microresonators, Nature Photonics 8, 145 (2013)

    work page 2013

  6. [5]

    F. Leo, S. Coen, P. Kockaert, S.-P. Gorza, P. Emplit, and M. Haelterman, Temporal cavity solitons in one- dimensional Kerr media as bits in an all-optical buffer, Nature Photonics 4, 471 (2010)

    2010

  7. [6]

    Bunel, M

    T. Bunel, M. Conforti, J. Lumeau, A. Moreau, and A. Mussot, Broadband Kerr frequency comb in fiber Fabry-Perot resonators induced by switch- ing waves, Physical Review A 109, 063521 (2024), arXiv:2402.09777

    arXiv 2024

  8. [7]

    Bunel, M

    T. Bunel, M. Conforti, Z. Ziani, J. Lumeau, A. Moreau, A. Fernandez, O. Llopis, G. Bourcier, and A. Mussot, 28 THz soliton frequency comb in a continuous-wave pumped fiber Fabry–P´ erot resonator, APL Photonics9, 010804 (2024)

    2024

Show all 59 references
  1. [8]

    Macnaughtan, M

    M. Macnaughtan, M. Erkintalo, S. Coen, S. Murdoch, and Y. Xu, Temporal characteristics of stationary switch- ing waves in a normal dispersion pulsed-pump fiber cav- ity, Optics Letters 48, 4097 (2023)

    2023

  2. [9]

    M. H. Anderson, W. Weng, G. Lihachev, A. Tikan, J. Liu, and T. J. Kippenberg, Zero dispersion Kerr solitons in op- tical microresonators, Nature Communications 13, 4764 (2022), arXiv:2007.14507

    2022 arXiv

  3. [10]

    X. Xue, M. Qi, and A. M. Weiner, Normal-dispersion microresonator Kerr frequency combs, Nanophotonics 5, 10.1515/nanoph-2016-0016 (2016)

    2016 doi

  4. [11]

    X. Xue, Y. Xuan, Y. Liu, P.-H. Wang, S. Chen, J. Wang, D. E. Leaird, M. Qi, and A. M. Weiner, Mode-locked dark pulse Kerr combs in normal-dispersion microresonators, Nature Photonics 9, 594 (2015)

    2015

  5. [12]

    D. C. Cole, E. S. Lamb, P. Del’Haye, S. A. Diddams, and S. B. Papp, Soliton crystals in Kerr resonators, Nature Photonics 11, 671 (2017), arXiv:1610.00080

    2017 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Pfeifle, A

    J. Pfeifle, A. Coillet, R. Henriet, K. Saleh, P. Schindler, C. Weimann, W. Freude, I. V. Balakireva, L. Larger, C. Koos, and Y. K. Chembo, Optimally coherent Kerr combs generated with crystalline whispering gallery mode resonators for ultrahigh capacity fiber communi- cations,...

    2015

  7. [14]

    The modeling of SBS encounters similar dif- ficulties, because the radiation scattered by the acoustic wave is phase-matched in the backward direction

    and LLE [50] have been generalized to FP geometry (FPLLE). The modeling of SBS encounters similar dif- ficulties, because the radiation scattered by the acoustic wave is phase-matched in the backward direction. A few years ago, a model for the description of cascaded SBS and f...

    2025 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Y. Sun, J. Wu, M. Tan, X. Xu, Y. Li, R. Morandotti, A. Mitchell, and D. J. Moss, Applications of optical microcombs, Advances in Optics and Photonics 15, 86 (2023)

    2023

  9. [16]

    Obrzud, S

    E. Obrzud, S. Lecomte, and T. Herr, Temporal solitons in microresonators driven by optical pulses, Nature Pho- tonics 11, 600 (2017)

    2017

  10. [17]

    Wildi, M

    T. Wildi, M. A. Gaafar, T. Voumard, M. Ludwig, and T. Herr, Dissipative Kerr solitons in integrated Fabry–Perot microresonators, Optica 10, 650 (2023)

    2023

  11. [18]

    Musgrave, S.-W

    J. Musgrave, S.-W. Huang, and M. Nie, Micro- combs in fiber Fabry–P´ erot cavities, APL Photonics 8, 10.1063/5.0177134 (2023)

    2023 doi

  12. [19]

    R. W. Boyd, Nonlinear Optics, Third Edition , 3rd ed. (Academic Press, Inc., USA, 2008)

    2008

  13. [20]

    Braje, L

    D. Braje, L. Hollberg, and S. Diddams, Brillouin- Enhanced Hyperparametric Generation of an Optical Frequency Comb in a Monolithic Highly Nonlinear Fiber Cavity Pumped by a cw Laser, Physical Review Letters 102, 193902 (2009)

    2009

  14. [21]

    M. Nie, J. Musgrave, K. Jia, J. Bartos, S. Zhu, Z. Xie, and S.-W. Huang, Turnkey photonic flywheel in a microresonator-filtered laser, Nature Communications 15, 55 (2024)

    2024

  15. [22]

    K. Jia, X. Wang, D. Kwon, J. Wang, E. Tsao, H. Liu, X. Ni, J. Guo, M. Yang, X. Jiang, J. Kim, S. N. Zhu, Z. Xie, and S. W. Huang, Photonic Flywheel in a Mono- lithic Fiber Resonator, Physical Review Letters 125, 143902 (2020)

    2020

  16. [23]

    Y. Bai, M. Zhang, Q. Shi, S. Ding, Y. Qin, Z. Xie, X. Jiang, and M. Xiao, Brillouin-Kerr Soliton Frequency Combs in an Optical Microresonator, Physical Review Letters 126, 63901 (2021)

    2021

  17. [24]

    Zhang, S

    M. Zhang, S. Ding, X. Li, K. Pu, S. Lei, M. Xiao, and X. Jiang, Strong interactions between solitons and back- ground light in Brillouin-Kerr microcombs, Nature Com- munications 15, 1661 (2024)

    2024

  18. [25]

    Zhang, T

    H. Zhang, T. Tan, H.-j. Chen, Y. Yu, W. Wang, B. Chang, Y. Liang, Y. Guo, H. Zhou, H. Xia, Q. Gong, C. W. Wong, Y. Rao, Y.-F. Xiao, and B. Yao, Soliton Microcombs Multiplexing Using Intracavity-Stimulated Brillouin Lasers, Physical Review Letters 130, 153802 (2023)

    2023

  19. [26]

    T. F. B¨ uttner, I. V. Kabakova, D. D. Hudson, R. Pant, C. G. Poulton, A. C. Judge, and B. J. Eggleton, Phase- locking and Pulse Generation in Multi-Frequency Bril- louin Oscillator via Four Wave Mixing, Scientific Reports 4, 1 (2014)

    2014

  20. [28]

    Bunel, M

    T. Bunel, M. Conforti, J. Lumeau, A. Moreau, A. Fer- nandez, O. Llopis, J. Roul, A. M. Perego, and A. Mussot, Unexpected phase-locked brillouin kerr frequency comb in fiber fabry perot resonators (CLEO ®/Europe 2023 - Postdeadline session, 2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Bunel, J

    T. Bunel, J. Lumeau, A. Moreau, A. Fernandez, O. Llopis, G. Bourcier, A. Perego, M. Conforti, and A. Mussot, Brillouin-induced kerr frequency comb in normal dispersion fiber fabry perot resonators (2025), arXiv:2502.03037

    2025 arXiv

  22. [30]

    A. B. Matsko, A. A. Savchenkov, D. Strekalov, V. S. Ilchenko, and L. Maleki, Optical hyperparametric oscil- lations in a whispering-gallery-mode resonator: Thresh- old and phase diffusion, Physical Review A 71, 033804 (2005)

    2005

  23. [31]

    A. A. Savchenkov, A. B. Matsko, and L. Maleki, On Fre- quency Combs in Monolithic Resonators, Nanophotonics 5, 363 (2016). 11

    2016

  24. [32]

    Y. K. Chembo and N. Yu, Selected for a Viewpoint in Physics Modal expansion approach to optical-frequency- comb generation with monolithic whispering-gallery- mode resonators, PHYSICAL REVIEW A 82, 33801 (2010)

    2010

  25. [33]

    Y. K. Chembo and C. R. Menyuk, Spatiotemporal Lugiato-Lefever formalism for Kerr-comb generation in whispering-gallery-mode resonators, Physical Review A 87, 053852 (2013)

    2013

  26. [34]

    Hansson, D

    T. Hansson, D. Modotto, and S. Wabnitz, On the nu- merical simulation of Kerr frequency combs using cou- pled mode equations, Optics Communications 312, 134 (2014), arXiv:1305.4921

    2014 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Ikeda, Multiple-valued stationary state and its insta- bility of the transmitted light by a ring cavity system, Optics Communications 30, 257 (1979)

    K. Ikeda, Multiple-valued stationary state and its insta- bility of the transmitted light by a ring cavity system, Optics Communications 30, 257 (1979)

    1979

  28. [36]

    K. J. Blow and N. J. Doran, Global and Local Chaos in the Pumped Nonlinear Schr¨ odinger Equation, Physical Review Letters 52, 526 (1984)

    1984

  29. [37]

    D. W. McLaughlin, J. V. Moloney, and A. C. Newell, New Class of Instabilities in Passive Optical Cavities, Physical Review Letters 54, 681 (1985)

    1985

  30. [38]

    L. A. Lugiato and R. Lefever, Spatial dissipative struc- tures in passive optical systems, Physical Review Letters 58, 2209 (1987)

    1987

  31. [39]

    Nozaki and N

    K. Nozaki and N. Bekki, Chaotic Solitons in a Plasma Driven by an rf Field, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 54, 2363 (1985)

    1985

  32. [40]

    I. V. Barashenkov and Y. S. Smirnov, Existence and stability chart for the ac-driven, damped nonlinear Schr¨ odinger solitons, Physical Review E54, 5707 (1996)

    1996

  33. [41]

    S. Coen, H. G. Randle, T. Sylvestre, and M. Erkintalo, Modeling of octave-spanning Kerr frequency combs using a generalized mean-field Lugiato–Lefever model, Optics Letters 38, 37 (2013)

    2013

  34. [42]

    Conforti and F

    M. Conforti and F. Biancalana, Multi-resonant Lu- giato–Lefever model, Optics Letters 42, 3666 (2017)

    2017

  35. [43]

    Kartashov, O

    Y. Kartashov, O. Alexander, and D. Skryabin, Multi- stability and coexisting soliton combs in ring resonators: the Lugiato-Lefever approach, Optics Express 25, 11550 (2017)

    2017

  36. [44]

    Castelli, M

    F. Castelli, M. Brambilla, A. Gatti, F. Prati, and L. A. Lugiato, The LLE, pattern formation and a novel co- herent source, The European Physical Journal D 71, 84 (2017)

    2017

  37. [45]

    Lugiato, F

    L. Lugiato, F. Prati, and M. Brambilla,Nonlinear Optical Systems (Cambridge University Press, 2015)

    2015

  38. [46]

    Haelterman, S

    M. Haelterman, S. Trillo, and S. Wabnitz, Additive- modulation-instability ring laser in the normal dispersion regime of a fiber., Optics letters 17, 745 (1992)

    1992

  39. [47]

    Ikeda and M

    K. Ikeda and M. Mizuno, Modeling of Nonlinear Fabry- Perot Resonators by Difference-Differential Equations, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 21, 1429 (1985)

    1985

  40. [48]

    L. A. Lugiato and L. M. Narducci, Nonlinear dynamics in a Fabry-Perot resonator, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik B Con- densed Matter 71, 129 (1988)

    1988

  41. [49]

    Firth, Stability of nonlinear Fabry-Perot resonators, Optics Communications 39, 343 (1981)

    W. Firth, Stability of nonlinear Fabry-Perot resonators, Optics Communications 39, 343 (1981)

    1981

  42. [50]

    W. J. Firth, J. B. Geddes, N. J. Karst, and G.-L. Oppo, Analytic instability thresholds in folded Kerr resonators of arbitrary finesse, Physical Review A 103, 023510 (2021)

    2021

  43. [51]

    Ziani, T

    Z. Ziani, T. Bunel, A. M. Perego, A. Mussot, and M. Con- forti, Theory of modulation instability in Kerr Fabry- Perot resonators beyond the mean-field limit, Physical Review A 109, 013507 (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    D. C. Cole, A. Gatti, S. B. Papp, F. Prati, and L. Lu- giato, Theory of Kerr frequency combs in Fabry-Perot resonators, Physical Review A 98, 013831 (2018)

    2018

  45. [53]

    Dong and H

    M. Dong and H. G. Winful, Unified approach to cascaded stimulated Brillouin scattering and frequency-comb gen- eration, Physical Review A 93, 1 (2016)

    2016

  46. [54]

    Ogusu and A

    K. Ogusu and A. Sakai, Generation and dynamics of cas- caded stimulated Brillouin scattering in a high-finesse fiber Fabry-Perot resonator, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Part 1: Regular Papers and Short Notes and Re- view Papers 41, 609 (2002)

    2002

  47. [55]

    C. Sun, N. Mangan, M. Dong, H. G. Winful, S. T. Cun- diff, and J. Nathan Kutz, Stable numerical schemes for nonlinear dispersive equations with counter-propagation and gain dynamics, Journal of the Optical Society of America B 36, 3263 (2019), arXiv:1906.11097

    2019 arXiv

  48. [56]

    G. P. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics (Academic Press, 2006)

    2006

  49. [57]

    It is important to note that conven- tion (i) is followed in Boyd’s textbook, while convention (ii) is used by Agrawal

    This factor stems from a different definition of the com- plex envelopes, namely (i) E = (Aeiωt + c.c.) vs (ii) E = (A/2eiωt +c.c.). It is important to note that conven- tion (i) is followed in Boyd’s textbook, while convention (ii) is used by Agrawal. This distinction affects...

  50. [58]

    R. J. LeVeque, Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems, Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics (Cambridge University Press, 2002)

    2002

  51. [59]

    Parra-Rivas, E

    P. Parra-Rivas, E. Knobloch, D. Gomila, and L. Gelens, Dark solitons in the Lugiato-Lefever equation with nor- mal dispersion, Physical Review A 93, 063839 (2016)

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.