Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 134 references

LBT IR observations of candidate super-Eddington quasars

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read CIV winds from six super-Eddington quasars carry about 4% of the bolometric luminosity.

desk verdict The new LBT spectra and the selection-criteria check are worth having; the headline 0.04 L_bol feedback number does not reproduce from the paper's own Table 8 and equations. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.18740 v1 pith:7YUII43H submitted 2025-04-25 astro-ph.GA

T. M. Buendia-Rios , P. Marziani , C. A. Negrete , D. Dultzin This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords super-EddingtonquasarsCIVemissionlinequasaroutflowsAGNfeedbackbroad-lineregionmetallicityEddingtonrationear-infraredspectroscopyHubblediagram
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Six quasars at redshifts $z \approx 2$–$3$, selected as candidates for accreting at or above the Eddington rate, were observed in the near-infrared to capture the H$\beta$ region, with archival optical spectra providing the UV lines. The paper's central claim is that these objects combine two ingredients relevant for galaxy evolution: the C IV line traces outflowing gas whose kinetic power is close to 4% of the bolometric luminosity $L_{\rm bol}$, near the threshold at which AGN-driven winds are thought to regulate host star formation, and the broad-line gas is metal-rich, around $10$–$20\,Z_\odot$. The authors therefore argue that highly accreting quasars at the peak epoch of galaxy growth can deliver both mechanical and chemical feedback. The same data let the authors check that the UV line-ratio criterion for identifying super-Eddington candidates agrees with the optical Fe II criterion in most cases, and that H$\beta$-based distance estimates for these objects follow the standard cosmic expansion curve.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing tool is multi-component spectral decomposition: each line is fitted with a Lorentzian broad component kept at the rest frame plus a blueshifted skewed Gaussian component, so the C IV blueshifted component isolates the wind from the virialized gas. Outflow dynamical parameters then come from a published framework for collisionally excited lines in photoionized gas, which expresses the ionized-gas mass, mass outflow rate, thrust, and kinetic power as functions of line luminosity, outflow velocity, and assumed density, radius, metallicity, and terminal-to-observed velocity ratio. The terminal velocity is taken as five times the observed blueshift, following a simple radiation-pressure wind model. For metallicity, the machinery is a grid of photoionization models predicting ten line-intensity ratios such as C IV/He II, Al III/C IV, and Fe II/H$\beta$ as functions of hydrogen density, ionization parameter, and metallicity; the best metallicity is the one minimizing $\chi^2$ over the grid. This decomposition is what connects an observed line profile to a physical feedback power.

What would settle it

Measure the C IV outflow radius and electron density in one of these six quasars directly, for instance by reverberation mapping of the C IV line or by using the C III]/Si III] ratio as a density diagnostic; if the emitting radius is roughly 10 pc rather than 1 pc, or the density is $10^8$ cm$^{-3}$ rather than $10^9$ cm$^{-3}$, the computed kinetic power would drop by roughly an order of magnitude, below the $0.5\%\,L_{\rm bol}$ threshold for circum-nuclear feedback.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Anchoring the quasar rest frame with H$\beta$ shows that C IV $\lambda$1549 in most of the super-Eddington candidates is dominated by a blueshifted component with velocities of roughly $-2000$ to $-5000$ km/s, while H$\beta$, Mg II, and Al III stay symmetric and near the rest frame. Interpreting this blueshifted C IV component as a radiation-driven wind, the paper derives ionized-gas masses, outflow rates, thrusts, and kinetic powers under explicit assumptions of density, radius, metallicity, and terminal-velocity factor; the resulting kinetic power is, on average, about $0.04\,L_{\rm bol}$, close to the 5% threshold invoked for AGN feedback on the host galaxy. A grid of photoionization models fitted to ten UV and optical diagnostic ratios returns broad-line metallicities of roughly $10$–$20\,Z_\odot$ for the objects with the best data. The paper concludes that super-Eddington quasars at $z\approx2$–$3$ are capable of both mechanical and chemical feedback on their hosts, and that low-ionization lines such as H$\beta$ remain reliable virial tracers even in these extreme accretors.

Load-bearing premise

The outflow dynamical parameters assume the C IV blueshifted component is a wind with fixed electron density $n=10^9$ cm$^{-3}$, radius $r=1$ pc, abundance $Z=5\,Z_\odot$, and terminal velocity $k=5$ times the observed shift; since kinetic power scales as $k^2 v^3$, a different radius, density, or velocity factor would move the derived feedback power below or above the $0.5$–$5\%\,L_{\rm bol}$ band.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the average kinetic power of about $0.04\,L_{\rm bol}$ holds, these super-Eddington quasars sit close to the 5% $L_{\rm bol}$ threshold at which AGN outflows are expected to affect the black-hole–host-galaxy relation.
  • Broad-line metallicities of about $10$–$20\,Z_\odot$ imply the same winds carry metal-enriched gas, making chemical enrichment of the host and circumgalactic medium a corollary of mechanical feedback.
  • The UV and optical selection criteria agree in roughly 75%–90% of cases, supporting the use of UV line ratios to find super-Eddington quasars when H$\beta$ is unavailable.
  • Because H$\beta$ and Mg II remain symmetric while C IV is strongly blueshifted, H$\beta$-based black hole masses and Eddington ratios stay trustworthy in these extreme accretors.
  • The H$\beta$ line-width distance moduli of the extreme quasars follow the standard cosmological curve, strengthening the proposal that low-ionization line widths can serve as distance indicators at $z>1$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The largest lever on the feedback number is the assumed terminal-velocity factor $k=5$: kinetic power scales as $k^2 v^3$, so a calibration of the true acceleration law (from line-profile shape or multi-epoch monitoring) could move the result across the $0.5$–$5\%\,L_{\rm bol}$ range.
  • If the high metallicities are real, super-Eddington quasar winds should leave detectable abundance imprints in circumgalactic gas at $z\approx2$; deep surveys of C II or CO emission around such quasars could test this.
  • The paper's single-epoch estimates could be turned into direct measurements by reverberation mapping of C IV in one or two of these objects, replacing the assumed radius of 1 pc and density of $10^9$ cm$^{-3}$ with measured values.
  • The H$\beta$ Hubble-diagram agreement hints that a larger near-infrared sample of super-Eddington quasars could become a standalone distance ladder at $z>1$, but the current five-object sample is too small to establish this.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports new LUCI/LBT near-IR spectroscopy of six SDSS quasars at z ≈ 2.37–2.44 selected as candidate super-Eddington (xA) sources. The Hβ+FeII coverage is combined with SDSS UV spectra to determine systemic redshifts, decompose line profiles, estimate black hole masses and Eddington ratios, derive CIV outflow dynamical parameters (mass rate, thrust, kinetic power), estimate BLR metallicities via photoionization grids, and build a virial-luminosity Hubble diagram. The headline conclusions are that the CIV winds carry kinetic power |epsilon| ≈ 0.04 L_bol, close to the 5% L_bol feedback threshold, and that the broad-line/outflow gas is metal-rich (Z ≳ 10 Zsun), implying both mechanical and chemical feedback to the host galaxies.

Significance. If the quantitative results hold, the paper is a valuable addition to the study of super-Eddington quasars at the epoch of peak galaxy growth: high-z Hβ spectroscopy of xA candidates is rare, and the combination of systemic redshifts, line decompositions, accretion parameters, outflow energetics, and metallicity in one sample is useful. The detailed multi-component fits, residual/noise analysis, quality-parameter uncertainties, and publication of the IR spectra are strengths. The central quantitative claim, however, is not currently reproducible from the printed equations and tabulated values, and the near-threshold feedback conclusion therefore needs revision before the paper can be accepted.

major comments (2)
  1. [§6.2 and Table 8] Table 8 does not reproduce the equations printed in §6.2 under the stated normalizations. For J084502 (log L_CIV = 44.52, v_o = 11293 km/s), the displayed expressions with n = 10^9 cm^-3, r = 1 pc, Z = 5 Zsun, and k = 5 give Mdot_ion ≈ 8 × 0.331 × 2.26 ≈ 6 Msun/yr and kinetic power ≈ 6.6 × 10^43 × 0.331 × 25 × 2.26^3 ≈ 6.3 × 10^45 erg/s, whereas Table 8 lists 50 Msun/yr and 2.1 × 10^45 erg/s. For J093403 the same equations give kinetic power ≈ 2.6 × 10^44 erg/s, while Table 8 lists 8.6 × 10^44 erg/s. In addition, combining the Table 8 kinetic powers with the L_bol values in Table 7 gives |epsilon|/L_bol ≈ 0.002–0.014 per object, with a sample average near 0.004–0.006, not the ≈ 0.04 quoted in §6.2 and used in §7 to argue proximity to the 5% L_bol feedback threshold. The table must be recomputed consistently with the stated model, the input values and equations for each column must be specified, and the abstract and conclusions must be based on the corrected average ratio.
  2. [§6.2 and Table 8] The outflow energetics are highly sensitive to assumed parameters that are not measured: n = 10^9 cm^-3, r = 1 pc, Z = 5 Zsun, and the terminal-velocity factor k = 5. Since kinetic power scales as k^2 and r^-1, a factor-of-two change in k or in r moves |epsilon| by factors of several, enough to cross the 0.005 L_bol and 0.05 L_bol thresholds for individual objects. The paper states these assumptions but does not propagate them into uncertainties or present alternative choices. Because the near-threshold feedback conclusion depends directly on these scalings, a sensitivity analysis (or at minimum explicit conservative lower/upper bounds) should be added before the claim can be evaluated.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains grammatical slips: 'The aim is obtain' should be 'The aim is to obtain', and 'on second stance' should be 'on second instance' or similar.
  2. [Table 5 note] The units in the Table 5 note are inconsistent: line fluxes are listed as 10^-17 erg s^-1 cm^-1, which should be 10^-17 erg s^-1 cm^-2.
  3. [§6.3 and Table 9] The text 'For J2018 the Mgii is not available' should refer to J2108 (J210831). In addition, the abstract's 'Z ≳ 10 Zsun' is based on three objects, one of which (J210831) reaches Z ≈ 500 Zsun and another (J144218) has a wide, poorly constrained 1σ range; the summary should state explicitly that the metallicity result rests on a small subset.
  4. [Fig. 5 caption] The caption's sentence about blue squares and black circles is garbled ('...are in blue'); please clarify which symbol/color corresponds to the full Hβ profile and which to the BC-only FWHM.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the outflow and metallicity derivations are transparent applications of published, externally calibrated methods; self-citations anchor methodology but do not make the central claims equivalent to their inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central measurements—redshifts, FWHMs, line shifts, and fluxes—are independent of the derived physical quantities. The outflow parameters in Section 6.2 are computed with equations reproduced in the text, following Marziani et al. (2017) and Deconto-Machado et al. (2024), with explicitly stated assumptions (k=5, n=10^9 cm^-3, r=1 pc, Z=5 Zsun). These are assumptions, not fitted to the claimed feedback fraction; changing them changes the results, so the derivation is not equivalent to its inputs by construction. The metallicity analysis uses observed diagnostic ratios against a CLOUDY photoionization grid, which is an external forward modeling step, and the quoted super-solar values follow from matching observed and predicted ratios. The Hubble diagram in Section 6.4 is explicitly presented as a restatement of virial and spectral-invariance assumptions, and it is not the basis of the paper's main feedback or metallicity conclusions. Self-citations (MS14, M17, Netzer & Marziani 2010, Floris et al. 2024) anchor the adopted methodology, but the relevant equations are stated in the paper and are externally falsifiable; they are not invoked as uniqueness theorems or as ground truth forbidding alternatives. One internal numerical concern should be flagged separately from circularity: Table 8 does not transparently reproduce the Section 6.2 equations for at least some objects, and the quoted average |epsilon| approximately 0.04 L_bol is not recovered from the tabulated kinetic powers and L_bol values in Tables 7 and 8. That is an arithmetic or reporting inconsistency, not a circular reduction of the derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The outflow energetics and the metallicity estimates are the central quantitative claims. Both are anchored to assumptions about gas density, radius, metallicity, velocity factor, and photoionization equilibrium that are stated but not independently measured. The black hole masses also inherit the calibration of virial scaling relations. These items are listed explicitly so the reader can see which numbers come from observation and which from prior models.

free parameters (5)
  • electron density n = 10^9 cm^-3 (assumed)
    Normalizes the mass outflow rate, thrust, and kinetic power in Section 6.2; no density diagnostic is measured for the CIV outflow.
  • emitting radius r = 1 pc (assumed)
    Appears as r^-1 in the outflow formulas; no spatial information is available, so r controls the absolute scale of the outflow energetics.
  • terminal velocity factor k = 5 (assumed)
    Relates the observed CIV profile shift to the terminal velocity in the M17 model; kinetic power scales approximately as k^3, making this a dominant multiplier.
  • metallicity Z in outflow normalization = 5 Zsun (assumed)
    Appears as an inverse factor in all outflow formulas; the actual abundance is estimated later in Section 6.3, so using the assumed 5 Zsun biases the absolute outflow numbers.
  • ionization parameter density product n_H U = 10^9.6 cm^-3 (assumed)
    Used in the virial luminosity equation in Section 6.4 to set the zero point of the distance modulus estimate.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption CIV blueshifted component is a wind with uniform density, single ionization stage, and well-defined abundance
    Explicitly stated as necessary assumptions in Section 6.2 before applying the M17 outflow equations.
  • ad hoc to paper Terminal velocity of the wind is k=5 times the observed CIV line shift
    The k factor is adopted from the Netzer & Marziani (2010) simple model; it is the largest single multiplier in the kinetic power estimate.
  • domain assumption Hbeta, MgII, and AlIII FWHM are virial broadening estimators for black hole mass
    The paper states CIV is unsuitable for virial mass estimates and uses Hbeta, MgII, and AlIII FWHM with scaling relations in Section 6.1.
  • domain assumption xA quasars have roughly constant Eddington ratio near 1 and spectral invariance
    This is the basis of the Hubble diagram equation in Section 6.4; if L/L_Edd varies significantly, the FWHM^4 luminosity scaling fails.
  • domain assumption CLOUDY photoionization models with the adopted SED reproduce the observed line ratios
    Used in Section 6.3 to translate 10-12 diagnostic ratios into metallicities; the models are not directly verified against the observed continuum SEDs.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of LBT IR observations of candidate super-Eddington quasars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7YUII43H

@misc{pith2026250418740,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: LBT IR observations of candidate super-Eddington quasars},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7YUII43H}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.18740}
}
abstract

Quasars accreting at very high rates are believed to be prime movers of galactic evolution because of their high radiative and mechanical output. The study presented in this paper investigates a sample of six highly accreting quasars at redshifts \( z = 2-3 \) using near-infrared observations from the LUCI spectrograph at the Large Binocular Telescope (LBT). The aim is obtain a precise measure of the quasar systemic redshift and accretion parameters (black hole mass and Eddington ratio) primarily from the \hb\ line, \ and on second stance from other intermediate and low ionization lines. Outflow dynamical parameters (mass rate of outflowing gas, its kinetic power and momentum rate) were estimated from the \civ\ emission line that is perhaps the most easily accessible tracer of high-ionization winds from the accretion disk, obtained from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. In addition, the joint analysis of the rest-frame optical and UV spectra allowed us to estimate the chemical composition of the broad line emitting gas. The high metal content of the outflowing gas ($Z \gtrsim 10 Z_\odot$) and the high values of thrust and kinetic power may induce a chemical feedback effect in the quasar host, in addition to mechanical feedback.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.18740 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Rest-frame spectra of our six type 1 AGN, with UV and optical regions after joining the observed spectra from LBT and the SDSS. Abscissas are rest-frame wavelength in Å and ordinates are specific flux in units of 10−15ergs s−1 cm−2 Å −1 . Dot dashed vertical lines trace the rest-frame wavelength, from left to right, of Siiv𝜆1397, Civ𝜆1549, Aliii𝜆1860, Mgii𝜆2800, and H𝛽, respectively. Siiv𝜆1397+Oiv]𝜆1402 – The underl… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. continued. From top to bottom SDSS quasars: J125914.83+672011.8, J144218.09+484101.8, and J210831.56-063022.5. MNRAS 000 , 1 –21 (2024) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Shift amplitude of the centroid at 1 4 peak intensity (left) and FWHM / FWHM (H𝛽) ratios vs. ionization potential 𝜒 (right) for the ionic species associated with the emission lines considered in this study. Different colors and symbols identify different object in the …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Distribution of the LBT sample in the optical (left) and UV (right) plane. 𝐿𝑒 𝑓 𝑡: The luminosity-dependent limit between Pop. A and Pop. B. of Sulentic et al. (2017) is shown in gold. The blue squares show the position within the sequence using only the BC for the H𝛽 …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Distribution of log 𝑀BH of H𝛽 (abscissa) vs. log 𝑀BH of Aliii and Mgii (ordinate), with the Pearson correlation of each computation. Dashed line is the equity line. Error bar are the mean values of the Aliii and Mgii uncertainties: 0.26 and 0.32, respectively [PITH_FU…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Distribution of shifts of the Blue component (if detected) on the profile lines of Civ, Siiv, Heii, Aliii, Mgii, H𝛽, and [Oiii] (in the case of [Oiii] is the semi-broad component blueshifted). Error bar are the mean values of the uncertainties of the FWHM and blueshift…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Distribution of the mass outflow rate (left), thrust (middle), and kinetic power (right) vs. bolometric luminosity for the Civ𝜆1549 emission line. Black dotted, continuous and dashed lines show 𝜖¤=𝐿bol,𝜖¤=0.05𝐿bol, and 𝜖¤=0.005𝐿bol, respectively. The crosses correspond…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Parameter space 𝑛H, 𝑈, 𝑍 for J084502. Left: data points in 3D space are elements in the grid of the parameter space selected for not being different from 𝜒 2 min by more than 1𝜎 confidence level, for the case turbulence 𝑡 = 0 km s−1 . Middle: projections on the plane (…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Left: Hubble diagram distance modulus 𝜇 versus redshift 𝑧 obtained from the virial luminosity equation. The five sources that are classified as xA (black) or borderline xA (gray) considered in this study are shown by larger symbols. Samples in Dultzin et al. (2020) ar…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

134 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...

  2. [2]

    Bischetti M., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629301 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...598A.122B 598, A122

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629301 2017

  3. [3]

    C., Marconi A., Ponti G., Risaliti G., 2017, preprint, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017arXiv170208046B ( @eprint arXiv 1702.08046 )

    Bisogni S., di Serego Alighieri S., Goldoni P., Ho L. C., Marconi A., Ponti G., Risaliti G., 2017, preprint, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017arXiv170208046B ( @eprint arXiv 1702.08046 )

    arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    A., Dultzin D., del Olmo A., D'Onofrio M., Mart \' nez-Aldama M

    Bon N., Marziani P., Bon E., Negrete C. A., Dultzin D., del Olmo A., D'Onofrio M., Mart \' nez-Aldama M. L., 2020, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/201936773 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...635A.151B 635, A151

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936773 2020

  5. [5]

    Bonzini M., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1675 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.453.1079B 453, 1079

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1675 2015

  6. [6]

    A., Green R

    Boroson T. A., Green R. F., 1992, @doi [ApJS] 10.1086/191661 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992ApJS...80..109B 80, 109

    doi:10.1086/191661 1992

  7. [7]

    S., Runnoe J

    Brotherton M. S., Runnoe J. C., Shang Z., DiPompeo M. A., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv767 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.451.1290B 451, 1290

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv767 2015

  8. [8]

    Bruhweiler F., Verner E., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/525557 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...675...83B 675, 83

    doi:10.1086/525557 2008

Show all 134 references
  1. [9]

    M., Negrete C

    Buendia-Rios T. M., Negrete C. A., Marziani P., Dultzin D., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202244177 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...669A.135B 669, A135

    2023 doi

  2. [10]

    Caccianiga A., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv939 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.451.1795C 451, 1795

    2015 doi

  3. [11]

    Cano-D \' az M., Maiolino R., Marconi A., Netzer H., Shemmer O., Cresci G., 2012, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/201118358 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...537L...8C 537, L8

    2012 doi

  4. [12]

    M., Netzer H., Lira P., Trakhtenbrot B., Mej \' a-Restrepo J., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw937 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.460..212C 460, 212

    Capellupo D. M., Netzer H., Lira P., Trakhtenbrot B., Mej \' a-Restrepo J., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw937 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.460..212C 460, 212

    2016 doi

  5. [13]

    Chartas G., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0ef2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...920...24C 920, 24

    2021 doi

  6. [14]

    C., Banerji M., Richards G

    Coatman L., Hewett P. C., Banerji M., Richards G. T., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1360 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.461..647C 461, 647

    2016 doi

  7. [15]

    J., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040037 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ARA&A..52..291C 52, 291

    Conselice C. J., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040037 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ARA&A..52..291C 52, 291

    2014 doi

  8. [16]

    A., 2024, @doi [Universe] 10.3390/universe10060254 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024Univ...10..254D 10, 254

    D'Onofrio M., Marziani P., Chiosi C., Negrete C. A., 2024, @doi [Universe] 10.3390/universe10060254 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024Univ...10..254D 10, 254

    2024 doi

  9. [17]

    M., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243801 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...669A..83D 669, A83

    Deconto-Machado A., del Olmo Orozco A., Marziani P., Perea J., Stirpe G. M., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243801 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...669A..83D 669, A83

    2023 doi

  10. [18]

    arXiv:2408.06260

    Deconto-Machado A., del Olmo A., Marziani P., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2408.06260 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240806260D p. arXiv:2408.06260

    2024 doi arXiv

  11. [19]

    Di Matteo T., Springel V., Hernquist L., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature03335 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005Natur.433..604D 433, 604

    2005 doi

  12. [20]

    C., Constantin A., Heidt J., J \"a ger K., Vestergaard M., Wagner S

    Dietrich M., Hamann F., Shields J. C., Constantin A., Heidt J., J \"a ger K., Vestergaard M., Wagner S. J., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/374662 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...589..722D 589, 722

    2003 doi

  13. [21]

    S., Popovi \'c L

    Dimitrijevi \'c M. S., Popovi \'c L. C ., Kova c evi \'c J., Da c i \'c M., Ili \'c D., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11238.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.374.1181D 374, 1181

    2007

  14. [22]

    Du P., Wang J.-M., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4908 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...886...42D 886, 42

    2019 doi

  15. [23]

    C., Li Y.-R., Bai J.-M., 2016, @doi [ApJL] 10.3847/2041-8205/818/1/L14 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...818L..14D 818, L14

    Du P., Wang J.-M., Hu C., Ho L. C., Li Y.-R., Bai J.-M., 2016, @doi [ApJL] 10.3847/2041-8205/818/1/L14 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...818L..14D 818, L14

    2016 doi

  16. [24]

    Dultzin D., et al., 2020, @doi [Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences] 10.3389/fspas.2019.00080 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020FrASS...6...80M 6, 80

    2020

  17. [25]

    Duras F., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731052 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...604A..67D 604, A67

    2017 doi

  18. [26]

    Duras F., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201936817 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...636A..73D 636, A73

    2020 doi

  19. [27]

    C., Trump J

    Elitzur M., Ho L. C., Trump J. R., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt2445 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.438.3340E 438, 3340

    2014 doi

  20. [28]

    Elvis M., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/317778 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...545...63E 545, 63

    2000 doi

  21. [29]

    T., Blandford R

    Emmering R. T., Blandford R. D., Shlosman I., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1086/170955 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992ApJ...385..460E 385, 460

    1992 doi

  22. [30]

    P., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/379823 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJS..150..181E 150, 181

    Eracleous M., Halpern J. P., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/379823 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJS..150..181E 150, 181

    2004 doi

  23. [31]

    C., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125521 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ARA&A..50..455F 50, 455

    Fabian A. C., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125521 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ARA&A..50..455F 50, 455

    2012 doi

  24. [32]

    Fiore F., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629478 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...601A.143F 601, A143

    2017 doi

  25. [33]

    arXiv:2405.04456

    Floris A., Marziani P., Panda S., Sniegowska M., D'Onofrio M., Deconto-Machado A., Del Olmo A., Czerny B., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2405.04456 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240504456F p. arXiv:2405.04456

    2024 doi arXiv

  26. [34]

    J., Hewett P

    Francis P. J., Hewett P. C., Foltz C. B., Chaffee F. H., Weymann R. J., Morris S. L., 1991, @doi [ ] 10.1086/170066 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991ApJ...373..465F 373, 465

    1991 doi

  27. [35]

    A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201936270 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...630A.110G 630, A110

    Ganci V., Marziani P., D'Onofrio M., del Olmo A., Bon E., Bon N., Negrete C. A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201936270 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...630A.110G 630, A110

    2019 doi

  28. [36]

    A., Marziani P., Dultzin D., \'S niegowska M., Panda S., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142837 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...667A.105G 667, A105

    Garnica K., Negrete C. A., Marziani P., Dultzin D., \'S niegowska M., Panda S., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142837 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...667A.105G 667, A105

    2022 doi

  29. [37]

    E., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348908 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...687A.235G 687, A235

    Gianolli V. E., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348908 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...687A.235G 687, A235

    2024 doi

  30. [38]

    Gillette J., Hamann F., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae429 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.528.6425G 528, 6425

    2024 doi

  31. [39]

    M., van Hoof P

    Gunasekera C. M., van Hoof P. A. M., Chatzikos M., Ferland G. J., 2023, @doi [Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society] 10.3847/2515-5172/ad0e75 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023RNAAS...7..246G 7, 246

    2023 doi

  32. [40]

    Hamann F., Ferland G., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/173366 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...418...11H 418, 11

    1993 doi

  33. [41]

    Hamann F., Ferland G., 1999, @doi [ARA&A] 10.1146/annurev.astro.37.1.487 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ARA

    1999 doi

  34. [42]

    F., Baldwin J

    Hartig G. F., Baldwin J. A., 1986, @doi [ ] 10.1086/163974 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986ApJ...302...64H 302, 64

    1986 doi

  35. [43]

    C., Wild V., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16648.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.405.2302H 405, 2302

    Hewett P. C., Wild V., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16648.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.405.2302H 405, 2302

    2010

  36. [45]

    F., Hernquist L., Cox T

    Hopkins P. F., Hernquist L., Cox T. J., Di Matteo T., Robertson B., Springel V., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/499298 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJS..163....1H 163, 1

    2006 doi

  37. [47]

    O., Ishibashi K., Davidson K., Gull T., 2000, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&A...361..977J 361, 977

    Johansson S., Zethson T., Hartman H., Ekberg J. O., Ishibashi K., Davidson K., Gull T., 2000, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&A...361..977J 361, 977

    2000

  38. [48]

    Kakkad D., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202038551 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...642A.147K 642, A147

    2020 doi

  39. [49]

    I., Sramek R., Schmidt M., Shaffer D

    Kellermann K. I., Sramek R., Schmidt M., Shaffer D. B., Green R., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1086/115207 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989AJ.....98.1195K 98, 1195

    1989 doi

  40. [50]

    Kharb P., Silpa S., 2023, @doi [Galaxies] 10.3390/galaxies11010027 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023Galax..11...27K 11, 27

    2023 doi

  41. [51]

    King A., Pounds K., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122316 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ARA

    2015 doi

  42. [52]

    M., Richards G

    Krawczyk C. M., Richards G. T., Mehta S. S., Vogeley M. S., Gallagher S. C., Leighly K. M., Ross N. P., Schneider D. P., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/206/1/4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJS..206....4K 206, 4

    2013 doi

  43. [53]

    R., Hanisch R

    Kriss G., 1994, in Crabtree D. R., Hanisch R. J., Barnes J., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 61, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems III. p. 437

    1994

  44. [54]

    Kwan J., Cheng F.-Z., Fang L.-Z., Zheng W., Ge J., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/175302 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...440..628K 440, 628

    1995 doi

  45. [55]

    Laha S., Reynolds C. S., Reeves J., Kriss G., Guainazzi M., Smith R., Veilleux S., Proga D., 2021, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-020-01255-2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021NatAs...5...13L 5, 13

    2021 doi

  46. [56]

    J., McDowell J

    Laor A., Fiore F., Elvis M., Wilkes B. J., McDowell J. C., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/303696 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...477...93L 477, 93

    1997 doi

  47. [57]

    M., 2004, @doi [ApJ] 10.1086/42\-20\-89 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...611..125L 611, 125

    Leighly K. M., 2004, @doi [ApJ] 10.1086/42\-20\-89 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...611..125L 611, 125

    2004 doi

  48. [58]

    M., Moore J

    Leighly K. M., Moore J. R., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/422088 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...611..107L 611, 107

    2004 doi

  49. [59]

    L., Greene J

    Liu G., Zakamska N. L., Greene J. E., Nesvadba N. P. H., Liu X., 2013a, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stt051 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.430.2327L 430, 2327

    doi

  50. [60]

    L., Greene J

    Liu G., Zakamska N. L., Greene J. E., Nesvadba N. P. H., Liu X., 2013b, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stt1755 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.436.2576L 436, 2576

    doi

  51. [61]

    A., Sargent W

    Malkan M. A., Sargent W. L. W., 1982, @doi [ ] 10.1086/159701 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1982ApJ...254...22M 254, 22

    1982 doi

  52. [62]

    L., Del Olmo A., Marziani P., Sulentic J

    Mart \' nez-Aldama M. L., Del Olmo A., Marziani P., Sulentic J. W., Negrete C. A., Dultzin D., Perea J., D'Onofrio M., 2018, @doi [Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences] 10.3389/fspas.2017.00065 , 4, 65

    2018

  53. [63]

    W., 2012, @doi [NewAR] 10.1016/j.newar.2011.09.001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012NewAR..56...49M 56, 49

    Marziani P., Sulentic J. W., 2012, @doi [NewAR] 10.1016/j.newar.2011.09.001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012NewAR..56...49M 56, 49

    2012 doi

  54. [64]

    W., 2014, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stu951 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.442.1211M 442, 1211

    Marziani P., Sulentic J. W., 2014, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stu951 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.442.1211M 442, 1211

    2014 doi

  55. [65]

    W., Dultzin-Hacyan D., Calvani M., Moles M., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/192291 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJS..104...37M 104, 37

    Marziani P., Sulentic J. W., Dultzin-Hacyan D., Calvani M., Moles M., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/192291 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJS..104...37M 104, 37

    1996 doi

  56. [66]

    W., Stirpe G

    Marziani P., Sulentic J. W., Stirpe G. M., Zamfir S., Calvani M., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200810764 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...495...83M 495, 83

    2009 doi

  57. [67]

    W., Plauchu-Frayn I., del Olmo A., 2013a, AAp, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013arXiv1305.1096M 555, 89, 16pp

    Marziani P., Sulentic J. W., Plauchu-Frayn I., del Olmo A., 2013a, AAp, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013arXiv1305.1096M 555, 89, 16pp

    arXiv

  58. [68]

    W., Plauchu-Frayn I., del Olmo A., 2013b, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/764/2/150 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...764..150M 764, 150

    Marziani P., Sulentic J. W., Plauchu-Frayn I., del Olmo A., 2013b, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/764/2/150 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...764..150M 764, 150

    doi

  59. [69]

    W., Negrete C

    Marziani P., Sulentic J. W., Negrete C. A., Dultzin D., D'Onofrio M., Del Olmo A., Martinez-Aldama M. L., 2014, @doi [The Astronomical Review] 10.1080/21672857.2014.11519739 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014AstRv...9d...6M 9, 6

    2014

  60. [70]

    A., Sulentic J

    Marziani P., Mart \' nez Carballo M. A., Sulentic J. W., Del Olmo A., Stirpe G. M., Dultzin D., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s10509-015-2611-1 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016Ap

    2016 doi

  61. [71]

    A., Dultzin D., Mart \' nez-Aldama M

    Marziani P., Negrete C. A., Dultzin D., Mart \' nez-Aldama M. L., Del Olmo A., D'Onofrio M., Stirpe G. M., 2017, @doi [Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences] 10.3389/fspas.2017.00016 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017FrASS...4...16M 4, 16

    2017

  62. [72]

    Marziani P., et al., 2018a, @doi [Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences] 10.3389/fspas.2018.00006 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018FrASS...5....6M 5, 6

    2018

  63. [73]

    9-13 April 2018

    Marziani P., et al., 2018b, in Revisiting narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxies and their place in the Universe. 9-13 April 2018. Padova Botanical Garden, Italy. Online at <A href=``https://pos.sissa.it/cgi-bin/reader/conf.cgi?confid=328''>https://pos.sissa.it/cgi-bin/reader/conf.cgi...

    2018 arXiv

  64. [74]

    Marziani P., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935265 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...627A..88M 627, A88

    2019 doi

  65. [75]

    Marziani P., et al., 2021, @doi [Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society] 10.3847/2515-5172/abe46a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021RNAAS...5...25M 5, 25

    2021 doi

  66. [76]

    Marziani P., et al., 2022, @doi [ApJS] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac6fd6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJS..261...30M 261, 30

    2022 doi

  67. [77]

    M., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/abc705 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJS..252...15M 252, 15

    Matthews B. M., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/abc705 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJS..252...15M 252, 15

    2021 doi

  68. [78]

    A., Falco E., Motta V., Guerras E., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aacbd3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...862..104M 862, 104

    Mediavilla E., Jim \'e nez-Vicente J., Fian C., Mu \ n oz J. A., Falco E., Motta V., Guerras E., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aacbd3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...862..104M 862, 104

    2018 doi

  69. [79]

    A., Fian C., Guerras E., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2910 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...880...96M 880, 96

    Mediavilla E., Jim \'e nez-vicente J., Mej \' a-restrepo J., Motta V., Falco E., Mu \ n oz J. A., Fian C., Guerras E., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2910 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...880...96M 880, 96

    2019 doi

  70. [80]

    Mejia-Restrepo J., Trakhtenbrot B., Lira P., Netzer H., Capellupo D., 2016, in Active Galactic Nuclei: What's in a Name?. p. 7, @doi 10.5281/zenodo.60354

    2016 doi

  71. [81]

    E., Lira P., Netzer H., Trakhtenbrot B., Capellupo D

    Mej \' a-Restrepo J. E., Lira P., Netzer H., Trakhtenbrot B., Capellupo D. M., 2018, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-017-0305-z , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018NatAs...2...63M 2, 63

    2018 doi

  72. [82]

    Mineshige S., Kawaguchi T., Takeuchi M., Hayashida K., 2000, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000PASJ...52..499M 52, 499

    2000

  73. [83]

    E., 1945, Contributions from the Princeton University Observatory, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1945CoPri..20....1M 20, 1

    Moore C. E., 1945, Contributions from the Princeton University Observatory, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1945CoPri..20....1M 20, 1

    1945

  74. [84]

    A., Dultzin D., Marziani P., Sulentic J

    Negrete C. A., Dultzin D., Marziani P., Sulentic J. W., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/62 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...757...62N 757, 62

    2012 doi

  75. [85]

    A., Dultzin D., Marziani P., Sulentic J

    Negrete C. A., Dultzin D., Marziani P., Sulentic J. W., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/771/1/31 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...771...31N 771, 31

    2013 doi

  76. [86]

    A., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833285 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...620A.118N 620, A118

    Negrete C. A., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833285 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...620A.118N 620, A118

    2018 doi

  77. [87]

    Netzer H., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122302 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ARA&A..53..365N 53, 365

    2015 doi

  78. [88]

    Netzer H., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2016 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.488.5185N 488, 5185

    2019 doi

  79. [89]

    Netzer H., Marziani P., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/724/1/318 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...724..318N 724, 318

    2010 doi

  80. [90]

    Netzer H., Lira P., Trakhtenbrot B., Shemmer O., Cury I., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/523035 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...671.1256N 671, 1256

    2007 doi

  81. [91]

    Netzer H., Lani C., Nordon R., Trakhtenbrot B., Lira P., Shemmer O., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/819/2/123 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...819..123N 819, 123

    2016 doi

  82. [92]

    Ohsuga K., Mineshige S., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/522324 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...670.1283O 670, 1283

    2007 doi

  83. [93]

    Ohsuga K., Mori M., Nakamoto T., Mineshige S., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/430728 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...628..368O 628, 368

    2005 doi

  84. [94]

    E., Pogge R

    Osterbrock D. E., Pogge R. W., 1985, @doi [ ] 10.1086/163513 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985ApJ...297..166O 297, 166

    1985 doi

  85. [95]

    J., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/316197 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998PASP..110..863P 110, 863

    Pickles A. J., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/316197 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998PASP..110..863P 110, 863

    1998 doi

  86. [96]

    C., Wang J

    Proga D., 2007, in Ho L. C., Wang J. W., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 373, The Central Engine of Active Galactic Nuclei. p. 267 ( @eprint arXiv astro-ph/0701100 ), @doi 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0701100

    2007 doi arXiv

  87. [97]

    P., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/830/2/104 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...830..104P 830, 104

    Punsly B., Marziani P., Zhang S., Muzahid S., O'Dea C. P., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/830/2/104 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...830..104P 830, 104

    2016 doi

  88. [98]

    T., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/503559 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....131.2766R 131, 2766

    Richards G. T., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/503559 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....131.2766R 131, 2766

    2006 doi

  89. [99]

    T., et al., 2011, @doi [AJ] 10.1088/0004-6256/141/5/167 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AJ....141..167R 141, 167

    Richards G. T., et al., 2011, @doi [AJ] 10.1088/0004-6256/141/5/167 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AJ....141..167R 141, 167

    2011 doi

  90. [100]

    Risaliti G., Elvis M., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200912579 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...516A..89R 516, A89

    2010 doi

  91. [101]

    G., Moreels G., Monnet G., 2000, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&A...354.1134R 354, 1134

    Rousselot P., Lidman C., Cuby J. G., Moreels G., Monnet G., 2000, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&A...354.1134R 354, 1134

    2000

  92. [102]

    arXiv:1108.0396

    Sadowski A., 2011, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011arXiv1108.0396S p. arXiv:1108.0396

    2011 arXiv

  93. [103]

    C., Trakhtenbrot B., Sturm E., Boller T., 2010, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16217.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.403.1246S 403, 1246

    Sani E., Lutz D., Risaliti G., Netzer H., Gallo L. C., Trakhtenbrot B., Sturm E., Boller T., 2010, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16217.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.403.1246S 403, 1246

    2010

  94. [104]

    Seifert W., et al., 2003, in Iye M., Moorwood A. F. M., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 4841, Instrument Design and Performance for Optical/Infrared Ground-based Telescopes. pp 962--973, @doi 10.1117/12.459494

    2003 doi

  95. [105]

    L., De Zotti G., Danese L., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08261.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.354.1020S 354, 1020

    Shankar F., Salucci P., Granato G. L., De Zotti G., Danese L., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08261.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.354.1020S 354, 1020

    2004

  96. [106]

    H., Miralda-Escud \'e J., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/690/1/20 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...690...20S 690, 20

    Shankar F., Weinberg D. H., Miralda-Escud \'e J., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/690/1/20 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...690...20S 690, 20

    2009 doi

  97. [107]

    Shen Y., 2013, @doi [Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India] 10.48550/arXiv.1302.2643 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013BASI...41...61S 41, 61

    2013 doi arXiv

  98. [108]

    Shen Y., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/817/1/55 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...817...55S 817, 55

    2016 doi

  99. [109]

    C., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature13712 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014Natur.513..210S 513, 210

    Shen Y., Ho L. C., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature13712 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014Natur.513..210S 513, 210

    2014 doi

  100. [110]

    Shen Y., Liu X., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/753/2/125 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...753..125S 753, 125

    2012 doi

  101. [111]

    Sigut T. A. A., Pradhan A. K., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/311369 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...499L.139S 499, L139

    1998 doi

  102. [112]

    Sigut T. A. A., Pradhan A. K., Nahar S. N., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/422027 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...611...81S 611, 81

    2004 doi

  103. [113]

    F., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/498708 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....131.1163S 131, 1163

    Skrutskie M. F., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/498708 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....131.1163S 131, 1163

    2006 doi

  104. [114]

    \'S niegowska M., Koz owski S., Czerny B., Panda S., Hryniewicz K., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aba620 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...900...64S 900, 64

    2020 doi

  105. [115]

    L., del Olmo A., D'Onofrio M., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abe1c8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...910..115S 910, 115

    \'S niegowska M., Marziani P., Czerny B., Panda S., Mart \' nez-Aldama M. L., del Olmo A., D'Onofrio M., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abe1c8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...910..115S 910, 115

    2021 doi

  106. [116]

    W., Marziani P., Dultzin-Hacyan D., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.38.1.521 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ARA&A..38..521S 38, 521

    Sulentic J. W., Marziani P., Dultzin-Hacyan D., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.38.1.521 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ARA&A..38..521S 38, 521

    2000 doi

  107. [117]

    W., Bachev R., Marziani P., Negrete C

    Sulentic J. W., Bachev R., Marziani P., Negrete C. A., Dultzin D., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/519916 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...666..757S 666, 757

    2007 doi

  108. [118]

    W., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201630309 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...608A.122S 608, A122

    Sulentic J. W., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201630309 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...608A.122S 608, A122

    2017 doi

  109. [119]

    Teerikorpi P., 2005, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005astro.ph.10382T

    2005

  110. [120]

    J., Ferland G

    Temple M. J., Ferland G. J., Rankine A. L., Hewett P. C., Badnell N. R., Ballance C. P., Del Zanna G., Dufresne R. P., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1717 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.496.2565T 496, 2565

    2020 doi

  111. [121]

    J., Ferland G

    Temple M. J., Ferland G. J., Rankine A. L., Chatzikos M., Hewett P. C., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1610 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.505.3247T 505, 3247

    2021 doi

  112. [122]

    J., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1524 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.532..424T 532, 424

    Temple M. J., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1524 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.532..424T 532, 424

    2024 doi

  113. [123]

    L., ed., Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol

    Tody D., 1986, in Crawford D. L., ed., Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 627, Instrumentation in astronomy VI. p. 733, @doi 10.1117/12.968154

    1986 doi

  114. [124]

    Trakhtenbrot B., Netzer H., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22056.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.427.3081T 427, 3081

    2012

  115. [125]

    E., et al., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/321167 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001AJ....122..549V 122, 549

    Vanden Berk D. E., et al., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/321167 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001AJ....122..549V 122, 549

    2001 doi

  116. [126]

    M., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/500572 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...641..689V 641, 689

    Vestergaard M., Peterson B. M., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/500572 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...641..689V 641, 689

    2006 doi

  117. [127]

    J., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/320357 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJS..134....1V 134, 1

    Vestergaard M., Wilkes B. J., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/320357 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJS..134....1V 134, 1

    2001 doi

  118. [128]

    Vietri G., 2017, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts. p. 302.06

    2017

  119. [129]

    Vietri G., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201732335 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A

    2018 doi

  120. [130]

    Vietri G., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039136 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...644A.175V 644, A175

    2020 doi

  121. [131]

    Wandel A., Petrosian V., 1988, @doi [ ] 10.1086/185166 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988ApJ...329L..11W 329, L11

    1988 doi

  122. [132]

    Wang J.-M., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acdf48 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...954...84W 954, 84

    2023 doi

  123. [133]

    Wills D., Netzer H., 1979, @doi [ ] 10.1086/157358 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979ApJ...233....1W 233, 1

    1979 doi

  124. [134]

    Xu F., Bian F., Shen Y., Zuo W., Fan X., Zhu Z., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1763 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.480..345X 480, 345

    2018 doi

  125. [135]

    W., Calvani M., Dultzin-Hacyan D., Bachev R., 2002, @doi [ApJL] 10.1086/342783 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...576L...9Z 576, L9

    Zamanov R., Marziani P., Sulentic J. W., Calvani M., Dultzin-Hacyan D., Bachev R., 2002, @doi [ApJL] 10.1086/342783 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...576L...9Z 576, L9

    2002 doi

  126. [136]

    W., Marziani P., 2008, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13290.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.387..856Z 387, 856

    Zamfir S., Sulentic J. W., Marziani P., 2008, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13290.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.387..856Z 387, 856

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.