Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 50 references

Fiber laser based stimulated Raman photothermal microscopy with long working distance optics

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Switching SRS readout from pump-beam loss to a probe-beam thermal-lens measurement yields ~105-fold higher SNR than unbalanced fiber-laser SRS and ~12-fold higher than autobalanced SRS, while allowing low-NA, long-working-distance optics.

desk verdict Solid fiber-laser SRP systems paper; the quantitative SNR headline needs a fully specified comparison protocol before I'd trust it. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.19875 v1 pith:VLUYI4NK submitted 2025-04-28 physics.optics physics.ins-det

Xiaowei Ge , Yifan Zhu , Dingcheng Sun , Hongli Ni , Yueming Li , Chinmayee V. Prabhu Dessai , Ji-Xin Cheng This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.ins-det
keywords stimulatedRamanphotothermalmicroscopyfiberlaserthermallensinglongworkingdistancelabel-freeimagingtissueclearingureaSNRimprovement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Fiber-laser-based stimulated Raman photothermal (SRP) microscopy detects the thermal lens left behind after Raman vibrational relaxation, rather than the small intensity loss of the pump beam. Because this readout uses a separate continuous-wave probe beam, it sidesteps the intensity noise of the compact fiber laser that otherwise limits SRS sensitivity, giving ~105-fold better signal-to-noise than fiber-laser SRS without balanced detection and ~12-fold better than autobalanced SRS on dimethyl sulfoxide. The same geometry removes the need for high-numerical-aperture collection, so a 0.55-NA air condenser with a 28 mm working distance suffices, opening the sample space to multi-well plates, flow cells, and thick tissues. The paper also identifies 8 M urea as a dual-purpose immersion medium that clears tissue and enhances the photothermal signal, enabling >200 µm deep volumetric imaging of cleared rat brain.

What carries the argument

The central object is the thermal lens generated by SRS-driven vibrational relaxation. A CW probe beam, slightly offset from the pump/Stokes focus, experiences a spatially varying refractive-index gradient and its far-field intensity changes; that change is demodulated on a lock-in amplifier. Because the modulation is imposed on the pump/Stokes beams and sensed by the low-noise probe, the fiber laser's intensity noise is effectively bypassed. Simulations in the paper place the optimal collection NA at ~0.32 for this thermal-lens contrast, which is why a 0.55-NA long-working-distance air condenser can replace the oil-immersion condenser required for SRS.

What would settle it

Measure the thermo-optic coefficient of 8 M urea near room temperature and compare SRP SNR on a standard sample (e.g., DMSO or 3 µm PMMA beads) in water versus 8 M urea with identical pump/Stokes/probe powers, modulation, and collection NA; if the urea signal is not proportionally higher, the thermal-enhancement claim is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the photothermal readout converts SRS from a technique shackled to low-noise solid-state lasers and high-NA immersion optics into one that works with a noisy, compact fiber laser and an air-gap condenser. In SRP, the pump and Stokes beams deposit heat through stimulated Raman absorption, and a third continuous-wave probe measures the resulting thermal-lens-induced redistribution of the probe's far field. The probe's noise floor is far below the fiber laser's, so the dominant SRS noise source is removed without balanced detection. On pure DMSO at the C-H vibration, the authors measure a 0.72% SRS modulation depth and a 3.3% SRP modulation depth under identical pump/Stokes conditions, and the SNR gain over fiber-laser SRS is ~105-fold (unbalanced) and ~12-fold (autobalanced). They further show that at NA 0.55 air collection, SRP preserves the Raman spectrum of PMMA beads while autobalanced SRS does not, and that urea-cleared rat brain slices can be imaged past 200 µm depth.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that 8 M urea boosts the heat-lens signal beyond what its tissue-clearing effect alone would provide; this depends on urea's thermo-optic coefficient, which the paper does not measure, so the claimed thermal enhancement could vanish if that coefficient is smaller than water's.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Compact fiber-laser SRP microscopes can deliver chemical contrast without the bulk and cost of solid-state OPO systems.
  • The long 28 mm working distance and air condenser make contact-free, open-top sample formats practical, including multi-well plates and microfluidic chips, without re-aligning optics between samples.
  • Urea-based clearing plus thermal enhancement extends volumetric label-free imaging past 200 µm in brain tissue, with depth limited mainly by the objective working distance.
  • Detection limits around 11 mM (C-H) and 14 mM (C-D) at 20 µs/wavenumber point to practical metabolic imaging with deuterium labeling on a portable source.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The urea 'thermal enhancement' claim would be strengthened by a direct water-versus-urea SNR measurement on the same sample; if urea's thermo-optic coefficient is near water's, the advantage may come mostly from clearing and refractive-index matching rather than heat capacity.
  • The noise-immunity argument is not specific to fiber lasers: any compact source with high intensity noise but short pulses, such as microchip or supercontinuum lasers, could adopt the same three-beam thermal-lens readout.
  • The optimal NA of ~0.32 suggests that tuning condenser NA for each solvent, rather than using the maximum 0.55, could improve contrast further; the paper does not explore that parameter.
  • Using a short-coherence-length probe laser would remove the interference fringes the authors observed at water-cell interfaces, potentially improving low-NA SRP on heterogeneous samples without oversampling.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports a stimulated Raman photothermal (SRP) microscope driven by a compact picosecond fiber laser, using a third CW probe beam and low-NA long-working-distance collection in an inverted geometry. It claims a ~105-fold SNR improvement over un-balanced fiber-laser SRS and ~12-fold over autobalanced SRS on DMSO; demonstrates 240 nm lateral resolution; shows spectral fidelity under air-condenser collection; images live cells and urea-cleared rat brain to >200 μm depth; and proposes 8 M urea as a thermal enhancement medium. The text includes thermal-lensing simulations, hyperspectral imaging with LASSO unmixing, and low-NA objective demonstrations.

Significance. If the quantitative claims are substantiated, this is a notable practical advance: replacing bulky OPO sources with a fiber laser and relaxing collection NA would expand coherent Raman chemical imaging to multi-well plates, thick cleared tissues, and contact-free clinical sampling. The paper includes self-contained measurements (SRS modulation depth as simulation input, qualitative validation of NA optimization), and the core imaging demonstrations appear internally consistent. Strengths include a clear motivation, direct comparison to prior autobalanced SRS, and explicit discussion of limitations such as probe coherence, laser power constraints, and background absorption. However, the headline SNR ratios and the urea thermal-enhancement mechanism require stronger evidence before the central claims can be fully accepted.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 2.3, Fig. S3] The ~105-fold and ~12-fold SNR improvements are the quantitative basis for the abstract's 'two-order-of-magnitude' claim, but the comparison is under-specified. The text and Fig. S3 list laser powers and duty cycle but not modulation frequencies, lock-in time constant/filter slope, detection bandwidth, number of replicates, or error bars. Since Fig. 3b shows SRP SNR strongly depends on modulation frequency (peaking at 600 kHz), while the SRS modulation-depth measurement in Fig. S2 was made at 125 kHz, a comparison at different frequencies could conflate modality advantage with operating-point choice. Please provide a fully specified protocol with identical settings for all three modalities and include replicate statistics; also clarify whether the autobalanced SRS data were acquired with the same system or taken from reference [21].
  2. [Section 2.6/2.7, Table S1] The claim that urea provides 'thermal enhancement' (abstract and Figs. 6-7) is not supported by the data. Table S1 lists the thermo-optic coefficient (dn/dT) for 8 M urea as '-' and no direct water-versus-urea SNR or contrast comparison is shown. Lower heat capacity (1420 vs 4184 J/kg/K) alone does not guarantee higher SRP signal if urea's dn/dT is smaller than water's; the relative signal intensity column is not given for urea. Please either measure dn/dT or provide an experimental water/urea SNR comparison. Otherwise, restrict the claim to tissue clearing and state that thermal enhancement is a hypothesis.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Discussion] The Discussion states '1~2 orders SNR improvement' while the abstract claims 'two-order-of-magnitude improvement'; please harmonize these statements.
  2. [Section 4.1] The text refers to a '0.12 MHz high pass filter'; please verify the units, since 0.12 MHz (120 kHz) seems plausible but is written unusually.
  3. [Section 2.7] The phrase 'axions and dendrites' should read 'axons and dendrites'.
  4. [Supplementary Method] The protocol titled 'Preparation of rat brain slice with tissue clearance' actually describes ovarian tumor cryosectioning; this appears to be a labeling error and should be corrected.
  5. [Fig. 3 caption] Panels c and d are described as 'spectral fidelity' and 'intensity-concentration relation,' but the text discusses limit of detection (LOD); please define LOD in the caption and report the linear-fit parameters if available.
  6. [Section 4.7] The LASSO regularization parameter β is stated to be 'empirically optimized' without giving its value or selection criterion; please report it to improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: direct measurements and a validated thermal-lens simulation, not fitted predictions.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are supported by direct instrument characterization and controlled comparisons rather than by an equation that feeds a fitted parameter back into a prediction. The thermal-lensing simulation in Sec. 2.2 starts from a measured SRS modulation depth (0.72%) and independently propagates it through tabulated thermal and optical properties to estimate the temperature rise and far-field probe contrast; the resulting SRP modulation depth (3.3%, Fig. S2b) is reported as a measurement consistent with the simulation, not as an output forced by a fit. The SNR claims (~105x over un-balanced fiber-laser SRS and ~12x over autobalanced SRS) are measured values shown in Fig. S3 under stated pump/Stokes/probe powers. Although the comparison protocol is under-specified and lacks error bars, that is an evidence-quality concern, not a construction by which the ratio is equal to its own input. The low-NA collection advantage is demonstrated directly by spectral-fidelity imaging (Fig. 4), contact-free geometry, and long-working-distance operation, not derived from a self-citation. Citations to prior SRP work [30] and the same group's autobalanced SRS work [21] are used as benchmarks or prior art, not as a uniqueness theorem or as the sole justification for a result derived in this paper. The urea thermal-enhancement claim has a genuine evidence gap: the urea thermo-optic coefficient is blank in Table S1 and no direct urea-versus-water SNR comparison is shown, so the thermal-enhancement mechanism is incompletely supported. However, that is an empirical/support gap rather than circularity. No load-bearing derivation reduces to its own inputs, so no circular steps are identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The free parameters are tuning choices (modulation frequency, LASSO beta, probe divergence offset). The axioms are standard modeling assumptions for thermal-lens simulations and the external tissue-clearing protocol. The most fragile item is the unmeasured urea dn/dT, which underpins the thermal-enhancement claim.

free parameters (3)
  • SRP modulation frequency = 600 kHz (50% duty cycle)
    Chosen from an SNR-optimization sweep; the 105x SNR improvement is measured at this optimum, so the headline gain is contingent on this tuning.
  • LASSO regularization parameter beta = not specified (empirically optimized)
    Needed for chemical unmixing in Figs. 5 and 7; its exact value is not reported.
  • Probe beam divergence offset = not specified (manual adjustment)
    The translational-lens position that maximizes the thermal-lens phase shift; described qualitatively in Section 4.1.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption All SRS energy loss in the focal volume is converted to heat, and the excitation can be approximated as a 3D Gaussian PSF.
    Used in Section 2.2 and Methods 4.2 to convert the measured 0.72% SRS modulation depth into a temperature map for the FDTD thermal-lens simulation.
  • domain assumption The thermal lens signal is governed by the medium's heat capacity, thermal conductivity, and thermo-optic coefficient; the literature values in Table S1 are correct.
    The predicted NA optimum and the urea enhancement argument both depend on these thermal properties; for 8 M urea the thermo-optic coefficient is not measured.
  • domain assumption The 8 M urea clearing protocol of ref 33 renders 300 um rat brain slices transparent enough for 200 um imaging depth without altering SRP contrast.
    Section 2.7 and Methods 4.6 rely on this external protocol for the volumetric histology demonstration.
  • domain assumption The unmodulated CW probe beam does not produce a time-varying photothermal background at the AOM modulation frequency.
    The lock-in detection at the AOM frequency rejects the probe's static thermal signal; this is the basis of the claimed noise immunity.
  • domain assumption LASSO reference spectra from pure cholesterol, BSA, TAG, and nuclear samples are linearly representative of the in-cell SRP spectra.
    Section 4.7; the chemical maps in Figs. 5 and 7 depend on this linear mixing assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fiber laser based stimulated Raman photothermal microscopy with long working distance optics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VLUYI4NK

@misc{pith2026250419875,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fiber laser based stimulated Raman photothermal microscopy with long working distance optics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VLUYI4NK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.19875}
}
read the original abstract

Stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy is a highly sensitive chemical imaging technique. However, the broader application of SRS has been limited by two key challenges: the reliance on low-noise but bulky solid-state laser sources and stringent sample requirements necessitated by high numerical aperture (NA) optics. Here, we present a fiber laser based stimulated Raman photothermal (SRP) microscope that addresses these limitations. While appreciating the portability and compactness of a noisy source, fiber laser SRP enables a two-order-of-magnitude improvement in signal to noise ratio over fiber laser SRS without balance detection. Furthermore, with the use of low NA, long working distance optics for signal collection, SRP expands the allowed sample space from millimeters to centimeters, which diversifies the sample formats to multi-well plates and thick tissues. The sensitivity and imaging depth are further amplified by using urea for both thermal enhancement and tissue clearance. Together, fiber laser SRP microscopy provides a robust, user-friendly platform for diverse applications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [21]

    H. Ni, P. Lin, Y. Zhu, M. Zhang, Y. Tan, Y. Zhan, Z. Wang, and J. -X. Cheng, Multiwindow SRS Imaging Using a Rapid Widely Tunable Fiber Laser, Anal. Chem. 93, 15703 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [1]

    Cheng and X

    J.-X. Cheng and X. S. Xie, Vibrational spectroscopic imaging of living systems: An emerging platform for biology and medicine, Science 350, (2015)

    work page 2015

  3. [2]

    X. Gao, X. Li, and W. Min, Absolute Stimulated Raman Cross Sections of Molecules, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5701 (2023)

    work page 2023

  4. [3]

    C. W. Freudiger, W. Min, B. G. Saar, S. Lu, G. R. Holtom, C. He, J. C. Tsai, J. X. Kang, and X. S. Xie, Label -Free Biomedical Imaging with High Sensitivity by Stimulated Raman Scattering Microscopy, Science 322, 1857 (2008)

    work page 2008

  5. [4]

    Ji et al., Detection of human brain tumor infiltration with quantitative stimulated Raman scattering microscopy, Science Translational Medicine 7, 309ra163 (2015)

    M. Ji et al., Detection of human brain tumor infiltration with quantitative stimulated Raman scattering microscopy, Science Translational Medicine 7, 309ra163 (2015)

    work page 2015

  6. [5]

    Oh et al., Protein and lipid mass concentration measurement in tissues by stimulated Raman scattering microscopy, Proc

    S. Oh et al., Protein and lipid mass concentration measurement in tissues by stimulated Raman scattering microscopy, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 119, e2117938119 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [6]

    Y. Shen, F. Xu, L. Wei, F. Hu, and W. Min, Live -Cell Quantitative Imaging of Proteome Degradation by Stimulated Raman Scattering, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 53, 5596 (2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [7]

    Yue et al., Cholesteryl Ester Accumulation Induced by PTEN Loss and PI3K/AKT Activation Underlies Human Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness, Cell Metabolism 19, 393 (2014)

    S. Yue et al., Cholesteryl Ester Accumulation Induced by PTEN Loss and PI3K/AKT Activation Underlies Human Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness, Cell Metabolism 19, 393 (2014)

    work page 2014

Show all 50 references
  1. [8]

    Shi et al., Optical imaging of metabolic dynamics in animals, Nature Communications 9, 1 (2018)

    L. Shi et al., Optical imaging of metabolic dynamics in animals, Nature Communications 9, 1 (2018)

    2018

  2. [9]

    G. Zhao et al., Ovarian cancer cell fate regulation by the dynamics between saturated and unsaturated fatty acids, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, e2203480119 (2022)

    2022

  3. [10]

    Li et al., Microglial lipid droplet accumulation in tauopathy brain is regulated by neuronal AMPK, Cell Metabolism 0, (2024)

    Y. Li et al., Microglial lipid droplet accumulation in tauopathy brain is regulated by neuronal AMPK, Cell Metabolism 0, (2024)

    2024

  4. [11]

    W. Hong, C. W. Karanja, N. S. Abutaleb, W. Younis, X. Zhang, M. N. Seleem, and J. -X. Cheng, Antibiotic Susceptibility Determination within One Cell Cycle at Single -Bacterium Level by Stimulated Raman Metabolic Imaging, Anal. Chem. 90, 3737 (2018)

    2018

  5. [12]

    Zhang, W

    M. Zhang, W. Hong, N. S. Abutaleb, J. Li, P.-T. Dong, C. Zong, P. Wang, M. N. Seleem, and J.-X. Cheng, Rapid Determination of Antimicrobial Susceptibility by Stimulated Raman Scattering Imaging of D2O Metabolic Incorporation in a Single Bacterium, Adv anced Science 7, 2001452 (2020)

    2020

  6. [13]

    X. Ge, F. C. Pereira, M. Mitteregger, D. Berry, M. Zhang, B. Hausmann, J. Zhang, A. Schintlmeister, M. Wagner, and J.-X. Cheng, SRS-FISH: A high-throughput platform linking microbiome metabolism to identity at the single -cell level, Proceedings of the National Academy of Scie...

    2022

  7. [14]

    F. C. Pereira et al., The Parkinson’s drug entacapone disrupts gut microbiome homeostasis via iron sequestration, bioRxiv 2023.11.12.566429 (2023)

    2023

  8. [15]

    L. Wei, Z. Chen, L. Shi, R. Long, A. V. Anzalone, L. Zhang, F. Hu, R. Yuste, V. W. Cornish, and W. Min, Super-multiplex vibrational imaging, Nature 544, 465 (2017)

    2017

  9. [16]

    L. Shi, M. Wei, Y. Miao, N. Qian, L. Shi, R. A. Singer, R. K. P. Benninger, and W. Min, Highly- multiplexed volumetric mapping with Raman dye imaging and tissue clearing, Nat Biotechnol 1 (2021)

    2021

  10. [17]

    R. C. Prince, R. R. Frontiera, and E. O. Potma, Stimulated Raman Scattering: From Bulk to Nano, Chem. Rev. 117, 5070 (2017)

    2017

  11. [18]

    Xu and F

    C. Xu and F. W. Wise, Recent advances in fibre lasers for nonlinear microscopy, Nature Photon 7, 875 (2013)

    2013

  12. [19]

    C. W. Freudiger, W. Yang, G. R. Holtom, N. Peyghambarian, X. S. Xie, and K. Q. Kieu, Stimulated Raman scattering microscopy with a robust fibre laser source, Nature Photon 8, 2 (2014)

    2014

  13. [20]

    K. Nose, Y. Ozeki, T. Kishi, K. Sumimura, N. Nishizawa, K. Fukui, Y. Kanematsu, and K. Itoh, Sensitivity enhancement of fiber-laser-based stimulated Raman scattering microscopy by collinear balanced detection technique, Opt. Express 20, 13958 (2012)

    2012

  14. [22]

    R. B. de Andrade, H. Kerdoncuff, K. Berg -Sø rensen, T. Gehring, M. Lassen, and U. L. Andersen, Quantum -enhanced continuous -wave stimulated Raman scattering spectroscopy, Optica, OPTICA 7, 470 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    C. A. Casacio, L. S. Madsen, A. Terrasson, M. Waleed, K. Barnscheidt, B. Hage, M. A. Taylor, and W. P. Bowen, Quantum -enhanced nonlinear microscopy, Nature 594, 7862 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    Z. Xu, K. Oguchi, Y. Taguchi, S. Takahashi, Y. Sano, T. Mizuguchi, K. Katoh, and Y. Ozeki, Quantum-enhanced stimulated Raman scattering microscopy in a high-power regime, Opt. Lett., OL 47, 5829 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    Bertoncini, S

    A. Bertoncini, S. P. Laptenok, L. Genchi, V. P. Rajamanickam, and C. Liberale, 3D -Printed high-NA catadioptric thin lens for suppression of XPM background in Stimulated Raman Scattering microscopy, Journal of Biophotonics 14, e202000219 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    Tsikritsis, E

    D. Tsikritsis, E. J. Legge, and N. A. Belsey, Practical considerations for quantitative and reproducible measurements with stimulated Raman scattering microscopy, Analyst 147, 4642 (2022)

    2022

  19. [27]

    Zhang, H

    J. Zhang, H. Lin, J. Xu, M. Zhang, X. Ge, C. Zhang, W. E. Huang, and J. -X. Cheng, High- throughput single -cell sorting by stimulated Raman -activated cell ejection, bioRxiv 2023.10.16.562526 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    Suzuki et al., Label -free chemical imaging flow cytometry by high -speed multicolor stimulated Raman scattering, PNAS 116, 15842 (2019)

    Y. Suzuki et al., Label -free chemical imaging flow cytometry by high -speed multicolor stimulated Raman scattering, PNAS 116, 15842 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    Y. Yu, A. S. Mutlu, H. Liu, and M. C. Wang, High-throughput screens using photo-highlighting discover BMP signaling in mitochondrial lipid oxidation, Nat Commun 8, 1 (2017)

    2017

  22. [30]

    Zhu et al., Stimulated Raman photothermal microscopy toward ultrasensitive chemical imaging, Science Advances 9, eadi2181 (2023)

    Y. Zhu et al., Stimulated Raman photothermal microscopy toward ultrasensitive chemical imaging, Science Advances 9, eadi2181 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Gaiduk, M

    A. Gaiduk, M. Yorulmaz, P. V. Ruijgrok, and M. Orrit, Room -Temperature Detection of a Single Molecule’s Absorption by Photothermal Contrast, Science 330, 353 (2010)

    2010

  24. [32]

    Gaiduk, P

    A. Gaiduk, P. V. Ruijgrok, M. Yorulmaz, and M. Orrit, Detection limits in photothermal microscopy, Chem. Sci. 1, 343 (2010)

    2010

  25. [33]

    M. Wei, L. Shi, Y. Shen, Z. Zhao, A. Guzman, L. J. Kaufman, L. Wei, and W. Min, Volumetric chemical imaging by clearing -enhanced stimulated Raman scattering microscopy, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, 6608 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    H. R. Ueda, A. Ertü rk, K. Chung, V. Gradinaru, A. Ché dotal, P. Tomancak, and P. J. Keller, Tissue clearing and its applications in neuroscience, Nat Rev Neurosci 21, 61 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    Brinkmann et al., Portable all -fiber dual-output widely tunable light source for coherent Raman imaging, Biomed

    M. Brinkmann et al., Portable all -fiber dual-output widely tunable light source for coherent Raman imaging, Biomed. Opt. Express, BOE 10, 4437 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    Adhikari, P

    S. Adhikari, P. Spaeth, A. Kar, M. D. Baaske, S. Khatua, and M. Orrit, Photothermal Microscopy: Imaging the Optical Absorption of Single Nanoparticles and Single Molecules, ACS Nano 14, 16414 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Thorn, A quick guide to light microscopy in cell biology, MBoC 27, 219 (2016)

    K. Thorn, A quick guide to light microscopy in cell biology, MBoC 27, 219 (2016)

    2016

  30. [38]

    Zhang and H

    Y. Zhang and H. Gross, Systematic design of microscope objectives. Part I: System review and analysis, Advanced Optical Technologies 8, 313 (2019)

    2019

  31. [39]

    Lin et al., Microsecond fingerprint stimulated Raman spectroscopic imaging by ultrafast tuning and spatial-spectral learning, Nature Communications 12, 1 (2021)

    H. Lin et al., Microsecond fingerprint stimulated Raman spectroscopic imaging by ultrafast tuning and spatial-spectral learning, Nature Communications 12, 1 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    Zhang, J

    C. Zhang, J. Li, L. Lan, and J. -X. Cheng, Quantification of Lipid Metabolism in Living Cells through the Dynamics of Lipid Droplets Measured by Stimulated Raman Scattering Imaging, Anal. Chem. 89, 4502 (2017)

    2017

  33. [41]

    T. Chen, A. Yavuz, and M. C. Wang, Dissecting lipid droplet biology with coherent Raman scattering microscopy, Journal of Cell Science 135, jcs252353 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    Shou and Y

    J. Shou and Y. Ozeki, Dual -polarization hyperspectral stimulated Raman scattering microscopy, Applied Physics Letters 113, 033701 (2018)

    2018

  35. [43]

    Tuck et al., Multimodal Imaging Based on Vibrational Spectroscopies and Mass Spectrometry Imaging Applied to Biological Tissue: A Multiscale and Multiomics Review, Anal

    M. Tuck et al., Multimodal Imaging Based on Vibrational Spectroscopies and Mass Spectrometry Imaging Applied to Biological Tissue: A Multiscale and Multiomics Review, Anal. Chem. 93, 445 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    Vanna, A

    R. Vanna, A. De la Cadena, B. Talone, C. Manzoni, M. Marangoni, D. Polli, and G. Cerullo, Vibrational imaging for label -free cancer diagnosis and classification, Riv. Nuovo Cim. 45, 107 (2022)

    2022

  37. [45]

    Y. Shen, F. Hu, and W. Min, Raman Imaging of Small Biomolecules, Annu. Rev. Biophys. 48, 347 (2019)

    2019

  38. [46]

    Zhang et al., Multi -molecular hyperspectral PRM -SRS microscopy, Nat Commun 15, 1599 (2024)

    W. Zhang et al., Multi -molecular hyperspectral PRM -SRS microscopy, Nat Commun 15, 1599 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    M. E. Durst and J. Mertz, Multiphoton Photothermal Imaging in Scattering Samples, in Optics in the Life Sciences (OSA, Monterey, California, 2011), p. NMD6

    2011

  40. [48]

    L. Wang, H. Lin, Y. Zhu, X. Ge, M. Li, J. Liu, F. Chen, M. Zhang, and J.-X. Cheng, Overtone photothermal microscopy for high -resolution and high -sensitivity vibrational imaging, Nat Commun 15, 5374 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    H. Ni, Y. Yuan, M. Li, Y. Zhu, X. Ge, J. Yin, C. P. Dessai, L. Wang, and J. -X. Cheng, Millimetre-deep micrometre -resolution vibrational imaging by shortwave infrared photothermal microscopy, Nat. Photon. 18, 944 (2024)

    2024

  42. [50]

    Zhang, M

    D. Zhang, M. N. Slipchenko, D. E. Leaird, A. M. Weiner, and J. -X. Cheng, Spectrally modulated stimulated Raman scattering imaging with an angle-to-wavelength pulse shaper, Opt. Express, OE 21, 13864 (2013). Supplementary Information for: Fiber laser based stimulated Raman pho...

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.