Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 147 references

Invertible Morava motives in quadrics

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Every element of Milnor K-theory mod 2 is realized as an invertible Morava motive.

desk verdict A serious, novel construction of invertible Morava motives for Milnor K-theory mod 2; the central argument looks sound, with the main risks in external RNP citations and deferred details. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.20029 v2 pith:55ZWE6V3 submitted 2025-04-28 math.AG math.KT

Andrei Lavrenov , Pavel Sechin This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AGmath.KT MSC 14C1514C2514F4211E0419E1555N22
keywords MoravaK-theorymotivesquadricsMilnorcohomologicalinvariantsnilpotenceprincipleChowinvertible
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper's central claim is that every element of the Milnor K-theory of a field modulo 2 is realized as an invertible object in the category of Morava K-theory motives: the assignment $\alpha \mapsto L_\alpha$ is an injective, natural, additive transformation $K^M_{n+1}(-)/2 \to \mathrm{Pic}(\mathrm{CM}_{K(n)}(-))$ on field extensions. The construction proceeds through quadrics: one lifts a class to a quadratic form in $I^{n+1}(k)$, studies the $K(n)$-motive of the associated quadric, and extracts the invertible summand $L_\alpha$. The authors develop a framework showing that Morava motives can look into the generic splitting tower of a quadratic form without changing the base field, and that for quadrics of dimension below $2^{n+1}-1$ the $K(n)$-motive determines the Chow motive. A reader should care because this is a motivic categorification of a classical cohomology group and a new mechanism for attaching cohomological invariants to Chow motives.

What carries the argument

The central objects are algebraic Morava K-theory $K(n)$ at the prime 2 and its category of motives $\mathrm{CM}_{K(n)}(k)$; the key mechanism is the reduction of $K(n)$-motives of high-dimensional quadrics to small ones. A field extension $K/k$ is called $A$-universally surjective when $A(Y) \to A(Y_K)$ is surjective for all smooth $Y$; for quadrics of dimension at least $2^{n+1}-1$, $k(Q)/k$ is $K(n)$-universally bijective, so the base-change functor reflects motivic decompositions and isomorphisms of projective homogeneous varieties. Combined with the nilpotence principle for correspondences, this lets the authors descend decompositions from the generic splitting tower. For the remaining quadrics of dimension at most $2^{n+1}-2$, Theorem 4.14 uses the unstable symmetric operations on algebraic cobordism to show the $K(n)$-motive carries the same decomposition information as the Chow motive. The invertible motive $L_\alpha$ is then extracted from the $K(n)$-motive of a Pfister quadric and is characterized by the property that it becomes the unit exactly over fields that split $\alpha$.

What would settle it

For $n=1$, take a field $k$ with a non-zero element $\alpha \in H^2(k,\mathbb{Z}/2)$ (for instance a quaternion algebra class) and compute the invertible $K(1)$-motive $L_\alpha$ constructed from the $K(1)$-motive of the corresponding quadric. If $L_\alpha$ is isomorphic to the unit motive $\mathbf{1}$ in $\mathrm{CM}_{K(1)}(k)$, the injectivity asserted in Theorem 6.1 fails; the paper predicts instead that $L_\alpha$ is non-trivial and becomes the unit only over fields that split $\alpha$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

This paper establishes Theorem 6.1: for a field $k$ of characteristic 0 and each $n$, there exists a unique injective natural transformation $K^M_{n+1}(-)/2 \to \mathrm{Pic}(\mathrm{CM}_{K(n)}(-))$ of functors of abelian groups on the category of field extensions. The value $L_\alpha$ at $\alpha$ is constructed as a direct summand of the $K(n)$-motive of a quadric: one lifts $\alpha$ to a form $q \in I^{n+1}(k)$, passes to the term of the generic splitting tower where the anisotropic part is a Pfister form, and uses the decomposition of the $K(n)$-motive of a Pfister quadric, which splits off Tate twists of a single non-Tate invertible summand. The assignment is natural in the base field and additive in $\alpha$, and $L_\alpha$ becomes isomorphic to the unit motive over a field extension exactly when $\alpha$ vanishes there.

Load-bearing premise

The construction's load-bearing premise is the nilpotence principle for Morava motives of projective homogeneous varieties: if a correspondence vanishes after base change to a function field, it must be nilpotent over the base field, and without this the liftings of decompositions and isomorphisms from $k(Q)$ back to $k$ used in Propositions 3.25, 4.3, and Theorem 5.13 would fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Each element of $K^M_{n+1}(k)/2$, equivalently of $H^{n+1}_{\mathrm{ét}}(k,\mathbb{Z}/2)$, is realized by an invertible Morava motive, giving cohomology classes concrete geometric incarnations and embedding Milnor K-theory mod 2 into the Picard group of $K(n)$-motives.
  • For quadrics of dimension at least $2^{n+1}-1$, the function field extension $k(Q)/k$ is $K(n)$-universally bijective, so studying the $K(n)$-motive of $Q$ reduces to the corresponding $K(n)$-kernel form of dimension below $2^{n+1}$.
  • For quadrics of dimension below $2^{n+1}-1$, direct summands of the $K(n)$-kernel motive are in bijection with direct summands of the Chow motive, and isomorphisms between $K(n)$-summands lift to Chow isomorphisms up to Tate twists (Theorem 4.14).
  • Over a splitting field $k(\alpha)$, an indecomposable summand of a $K(n)$-motive either stays indecomposable or splits into two isomorphic copies; isomorphisms over $k(\alpha)$ either already hold over $k$ or hold after tensoring with $L_\alpha$ (Theorem 5.13, Proposition 5.28).
  • The kernel of the base-change map $\mathrm{Pic}(\mathrm{CM}_{K(n)}(k)) \to \mathrm{Pic}(\mathrm{CM}_{K(n)}(k(\alpha)))$ is $\mathbb{Z}/2$ generated by $L_\alpha$, and the occurrence of $L_\alpha$ in a $K(n)$-motive can be detected by counting Tate summands over $k$ and over $k(\alpha)$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the construction extends to odd primes and to $\mathbb{Z}/p^r$ coefficients as the authors expect, the Picard group of Morava motives would become a systematic home for étale cohomology classes of degree $n+1$, not just for mod 2 classes.
  • The paper's Conjecture 8.14 predicts that any rationally split Chow motive whose lower Morava motives are split must decompose into Tate twists of the invertible motives $L_\alpha$; if true, every such motive would carry a canonically associated cohomological invariant, turning $K(n)$-motives into a general invariant-detection machine.
  • Because numerical Morava motives form a semi-simple category, the occurrence of $L_\alpha$ in a $K(n)$-motive can in principle be verified by computing $K(n)_{\mathrm{num}}$ over $k$ and over $k(\alpha)$, which suggests concrete calculations of motivic measures on the Grothendieck ring of varieties.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a theory of Grothendieck motives for algebraic Morava K-theory K(n) at the prime 2, focusing on quadrics. Its central claim, stated as Theorem 6.1 in the introduction, is that there is a unique injective natural transformation from the functor K^M_{n+1}(-)/2 into the Picard group of invertible K(n)-motives, i.e. every element of Milnor K-theory modulo 2 is realized by an invertible Morava motive, naturally and additively. To achieve this, the authors establish a reduction principle: for a quadric of dimension at least 2^{n+1}-1, base change to its function field reflects motivic decompositions and isomorphisms of projective homogeneous varieties. For quadrics of dimension less than 2^{n+1}-1, they prove that the Chow motive can be reconstructed from the K(n)-motive, using Vishik's symmetric operations on algebraic cobordism. They also study invertible summands, relate them to Kahn's Descent conjecture, and prove one direction of a 'guiding principle' connecting splitting of Morava motives to vanishing of cohomological invariants.

Significance. If correct, the main theorem gives a motivic categorification of Milnor K-theory modulo 2, a genuinely new structural result. The reflection principle for K(n)-motives of quadrics and the Chow-from-Morava reconstruction theorem are significant technical contributions that go beyond previously known results. The paper is also commendable for being largely self-contained in its main arguments: it gives detailed proofs of the reduction to small quadrics, the outer excellent connections, and the reconstruction theorem, and it states explicit conjectures with unconditional cases for n=1,2,3. The connection to cohomological invariants and Kahn's Descent conjecture provides falsifiable predictions. The main reservations concern the reliance on external Rost Nilpotence Property results and the absence of parts of the manuscript from the submitted text.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sections 6–8, Appendices A–B] The supplied text ends in Section 5.4 and does not contain Sections 6–8 or Appendices A–B. The central Theorem 6.1, the construction of L_alpha for general elements of Milnor K-theory, and the geometric Rost Nilpotence Property (Proposition A.1, used in Proposition 3.3) are therefore not available for verification. Because Theorem 6.1 is the paper's main claim and Proposition 3.3 is load-bearing for the reflection principle, the full manuscript must be provided before a complete assessment is possible.
  2. [Proposition 3.23, Example 3.25] The reduction principle used throughout Sections 4–6 depends on the Rost Nilpotence Property for projective homogeneous varieties in the strong form needed for the Vishik–Yagita lifting conditions, including RNP for the algebraic closure \(\bar{k}/k\) and for \(k(Y)/\bar{k(Y)}\). This is cited to [GV18] and not proved in the supplied text. The authors should state explicitly which theorem of [GV18] applies to the mod-2 Morava K-theory K(n) with coefficients F_2[v_n,v_n^{-1}], and confirm that it covers the algebraic closure base change. If [GV18] has hidden hypotheses excluding this case, then Propositions 4.3, 5.13, and ultimately Theorem 6.1 lose their support.
  3. [Proposition 1.20] The proof of Proposition 1.20, which describes the possible forms of rational isomorphisms between summands of K(n)-motives of quadrics, ends with 'We leave the computational details to the reader' after reducing to a case analysis in M_2x2(F_2). This classification is used in Lemma 4.18 and hence in the proof of Theorem 4.14(2), so the missing case analysis is load-bearing. The authors should provide the complete computation or a reference where it appears.
  4. [Introduction and Proposition 1.7] The introduction states that the methods of this paper differ from [SS21] and that the authors 'do not rely on [SS21] in our proofs', but Proposition 1.7, which constructs L_alpha for symbols and proves its basic properties, is explicitly cited from [SS21, Prop. 6.2(2)]. Since this is the base case for the general construction in Theorem 6.1, the paper should accurately state what is imported from [SS21] and what is new. The current wording is misleading and should be corrected.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 1.2.7] The notation K(n) is used both for the mod-2 Morava K-theory and for the quotient K(n)/(v_n-1), with the remark that the same symbol is kept in Section 5. This is a potential source of confusion; a distinct notation for the quotient would improve readability.
  2. [Section 4.3.1] In the proof of Proposition 4.6, the notation BP(Q) and BP(Q) appears without explicit definition of the latter; the reader should be told that BP(Q) is the quotient of BP(Q) by negative-degree coefficient elements, as introduced in the proof of Lemma 4.5.
  3. [Example 3.17] The statement that for n=1 the same argument gives K0/2-universal bijectivity is plausible via the identification K(1) with K0 modulo 2, but this identification should be stated explicitly at that point.
  4. [Throughout] The paper relies on several unpubublished results, notably those of Shinder and the second author in Section 2 and the geometric RNP in Appendix A. Please ensure these are clearly marked as such in the published version, and that all permissions/citations are in place.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular reduction in the derivation chain; author-overlapping citations are prior inputs, not built-in predictions.

full rationale

The construction of L_alpha does not reduce by definition to an input. The base symbol case (Prop. 1.7) is imported from [SS21, Prop. 6.2(2)] and is a concrete parameter-free statement about the K(n)-specialization of Rost motives; it is not a restatement of Theorem 6.1. The paper's new work—the generic-splitting reduction (Prop. 4.3 via Ex. 3.25), the reconstruction theorem 4.14, and the k(alpha)-isomorphism/decomposition controls in Thm 5.13 and Prop. 5.28—does not quote Theorem 6.1 as an assumption. The reflection principle in Prop. 3.23 rests on the Rost Nilpotence Property cited from [GV18] and on the geometric RNP proved in Appendix A; these are external or internally derived support, not fitted inputs. No equation in the supplied text exhibits a predicted quantity equal by construction to a fitted parameter, nor is the uniqueness/injectivity of the transformation forced by a prior same-author 'uniqueness theorem' in the visible text. The main caveats are reliance on external RNP machinery and on published/computational results by the authors; these are verification/deference concerns, not observed circularity. Score 2 reflects the presence of several author-overlapping citations (notably [SS21]) at the base of the construction, while the central extension and reconstruction results remain independent.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted numerical parameters appear in this paper. The invertible motives L_alpha are constructed, not postulated, and no new particles, forces, or ad hoc entities are introduced. The central assumptions are standard external results and the characteristic-0 domain restriction.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Algebraic Morava K-theory K(n) and its integral version are free, coherent, extended oriented cohomology theories over characteristic-0 fields, satisfying localization and transversal base change.
    Used throughout Sections 2 through 4. The paper notes in Section 1.2.6 that positive characteristic is excluded because localization for algebraic cobordism is not known in that setting.
  • standard math Rost Nilpotence Property holds for K(n)-motives of projective homogeneous varieties over arbitrary field extensions, and the geometric version in Appendix A has nilpotent kernel.
    Load-bearing for lifting decompositions and isomorphisms from function fields, as in Proposition 3.3, Corollary 3.8, and Example 3.25.
  • standard math Vishik's unstable symmetric operations on algebraic cobordism satisfy the Chow-trace formulas and Steenrod operation formulas used in Section 4.
    External results from [Vi16] and [Vi19a], stated as Propositions 1.13 through 1.16 and used in Proposition 4.6 and Theorem 4.14.
  • standard math The Milnor conjectures identify K^M_{n+1}(k)/2 with I^{n+1}(k)/I^{n+2}(k) and with H^{n+1}(k,Z/2), and the generic splitting tower has a Pfister form at the leading stage.
    Used to lift an element of Milnor K-theory to a quadratic form and to locate Pfister quadrics in the splitting tower, as in Theorem 1.1 and Corollary 1.2 from [OVV07].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Invertible Morava motives in quadrics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/55ZWE6V3

@misc{pith2026250420029,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Invertible Morava motives in quadrics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/55ZWE6V3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.20029}
}
abstract

We associate to any element in the Milnor K-theory of a field $k$ modulo 2 an invertible Morava K-theory motive over $k$. Specifically, for $\alpha$ in $\mathrm{K}^{\mathrm{M}}_{n+1}(k)/2$ we construct an invertible $\mathrm{K}(n)$-motive $L_\alpha$ in a way that is natural in the base field and additive in $\alpha$. This can be seen as categorification of $\mathrm{K}^{\mathrm{M}}_{n+1}(k)/2$ in motives. The motives $L_\alpha$ are constructed as direct summands of the $\mathrm{K}(n)$-motives of quadrics, and we develop the necessary framework for the study of the latter. We show that passing to the field of functions of quadrics of dimension greater than or equal to $2^{n+1}-1$ does not lose any information about the structure of $\mathrm{K}(n)$-motives. This is based on the study of "decomposition of the diagonal" in Morava K-theory of quadrics. For quadrics of dimension less than $2^{n+1}-1$, we show that their Chow motives can be "reconstructed" from their $\mathrm{K}(n)$-motives, although the latter appear structurally simpler. Our proof of this result relies on the use of the unstable symmetric operations of Vishik on algebraic cobordism. The occurrence of the motive $L_\alpha$ as a direct summand of the $\mathrm{K}(n)$-motive of $X$ can be seen as evidence that $\alpha$ is a cohomological invariant of $X$. We study this occurrence for quadrics and relate it to Kahn's Descent conjecture.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

147 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Chow rings of quasi-split geometrically almost simple algebraic groups, arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.09390 (2024)

    Ananyevskiy A., Geldhauser N. Chow rings of quasi-split geometrically almost simple algebraic groups, arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.09390 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Bivariant derived algebraic cobordism, Journal of Algebraic Geometry, pp

    Annala T. Bivariant derived algebraic cobordism, Journal of Algebraic Geometry, pp. 205–252 (2021)

    2021

  3. [3]

    Precobordism and cobordism, Algebra & Number Theory, pp

    Annala T. Precobordism and cobordism, Algebra & Number Theory, pp. 2571–2646 (2022)

    2022

  4. [4]

    Chern classes in precobordism theories, Journal of the European Mathematical Society, pp

    Annala T. Chern classes in precobordism theories, Journal of the European Mathematical Society, pp. 1379–1422 (2022)

    2022

  5. [5]

    Algebraic Spivak’s theorem and applications, Geometry & Topology, pp

    Annala T. Algebraic Spivak’s theorem and applications, Geometry & Topology, pp. 351–396 (2023)

    2023

  6. [6]

    Cohomologische Invarianten quadratischer Formen, J

    Arason J. Cohomologische Invarianten quadratischer Formen, J. Alg., pp. 448–491 (1975)

    1975

  7. [7]

    L., Parimala R

    Auel A., Colliot-Thélène J. L., Parimala R. Universal unramified cohomology of cubic fourfolds containing a plane, Brauer Groups and Obstruction Problems: Moduli Spaces and Arithmetic, pp. 29–55 (2017)

    2017

  8. [8]

    On the invertibility of motives of affine quadrics, Documenta Mathematica, pp

    Bachmann T. On the invertibility of motives of affine quadrics, Documenta Mathematica, pp. 363–395 (2017)

    2017

Show all 147 references
  1. [9]

    Norms in motivic homotopy theory, Astérisque 425 (2021)

    Bachmann T., Hoyois M. Norms in motivic homotopy theory, Astérisque 425 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    Motivic equivalence of affine quadrics, Mathematische Annalen, pp

    Bachmann T., Vishik A. Motivic equivalence of affine quadrics, Mathematische Annalen, pp. 741–751 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    Classical groups and the Hasse principle, Ann

    Bayer-Fluckiger E., Parimala R. Classical groups and the Hasse principle, Ann. Math., pp. 651–693 (1998)

    1998

  4. [12]

    Pfister involutions, Proc

    Bayer-Fluckiger E., Parimala R., Qu\'eguiner-Mathieu A. Pfister involutions, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Math. Sci., pp. 365–377 (2003)

    2003

  5. [13]

    Cohomological invariants of algebraic tori, Algebra Number Theory, pp

    Blinstein S., Merkurjev A. Cohomological invariants of algebraic tori, Algebra Number Theory, pp. 1643–1684 (2013)

    2013

  6. [14]

    Remarks on correspondences and algebraic cycles, American Journal of Mathematics, pp

    Bloch S., Srinivas V. Remarks on correspondences and algebraic cycles, American Journal of Mathematics, pp. 1235–1253 (1983)

    1983

  7. [15]

    Linear algebraic groups, Springer Science & Business Media (2012)

    Borel A. Linear algebraic groups, Springer Science & Business Media (2012)

    2012

  8. [16]

    Steenrod operations in Chow theory, Trans

    Brosnan P. Steenrod operations in Chow theory, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., pp. 1869–1903 (2003)

    2003

  9. [17]

    A short proof of Rost nilpotence via refined correspondences, Documenta Mathematica, pp

    Brosnan P. A short proof of Rost nilpotence via refined correspondences, Documenta Mathematica, pp. 69–78 (2003)

    2003

  10. [18]

    On motivic decompositions arising from the method of Białynicki-Birula, Inventiones mathematicae, pp

    Brosnan P. On motivic decompositions arising from the method of Białynicki-Birula, Inventiones mathematicae, pp. 91–111 (2005)

    2005

  11. [19]

    Modules associés à un groupe formel commutatif

    Cartier P. Modules associés à un groupe formel commutatif. Courbes typiques, CR Acad. Sc. Paris, pp. 129–132 (1967)

    1967

  12. [20]

    The kernel of the Rost invariant, Serre’s Conjecture II and the Hasse principle for quasi-split groups \!\,^ 3,6 D_4 , E_6 and E_7 , Math

    Chernousov V. The kernel of the Rost invariant, Serre’s Conjecture II and the Hasse principle for quasi-split groups \!\,^ 3,6 D_4 , E_6 and E_7 , Math. Ann., pp. 297–330 (2003)

    2003

  13. [21]

    Another Proof of Totaro’s Theorem on E_8 -Torsors, Canadian Mathematical Bulletin, pp

    Chernousov V. Another Proof of Totaro’s Theorem on E_8 -Torsors, Canadian Mathematical Bulletin, pp. 196–202 (2006)

    2006

  14. [22]

    Chernousov V. Variations on a theme of groups splitting by a quadratic extension and Grothendieck–Serre conjecture for group schemes F_4 with trivial g_3 invariant, Documenta Mathematica, Andrei A. Suslin sixtieth birthday volume, pp. 147–169 (2010)

    2010

  15. [23]

    Motivic decomposition of isotropic projective homogeneous varieties, Duke Math

    Chernousov V., Gille S., Merkurjev A. Motivic decomposition of isotropic projective homogeneous varieties, Duke Math. J., pp. 137–159 (2005)

    2005

  16. [24]

    Motivic decomposition of projective homogeneous varieties and the Krull-Schmidt theorem, Transform

    Chernousov V., Merkurjev A. Motivic decomposition of projective homogeneous varieties and the Krull-Schmidt theorem, Transform. Groups, pp. 371–386 (2006)

    2006

  17. [25]

    Hypersurfaces quartiques de dimension 3: non-rationalité stable, Ann

    Colliot-Thélène J.-L., Pirutka A. Hypersurfaces quartiques de dimension 3: non-rationalité stable, Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér., pp. 371–397 (2016)

    2016

  18. [26]

    Équivalence motivique des groupes semi-simples, Compositio Mathematica, pp

    De Clercq C. Équivalence motivique des groupes semi-simples, Compositio Mathematica, pp. 2195–2213 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    Higher Tate traces of Chow motives, Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, pp

    De Clercq C., Qu\'eguiner-Mathieu A. Higher Tate traces of Chow motives, Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, pp. 1–22 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    A-upper motives of reductive groups, arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.11030v3 (2024)

    De Clercq C., Karpenko N., Qu\'eguiner-Mathieu A. A-upper motives of reductive groups, arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.11030v3 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Splitting families in Galois cohomology, Annales Scientifiques de l'École Normale Supérieure (2021)

    Demarche C., Florence M. Splitting families in Galois cohomology, Annales Scientifiques de l'École Normale Supérieure (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    Motivic decomposition of abelian schemes and the Fourier transform, Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, pp

    Deninger C., Murre J. Motivic decomposition of abelian schemes and the Fourier transform, Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, pp. 201–219 (1991)

    1991

  23. [31]

    On the Balmer spectrum of Morel-Voevodsky category, arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.09077 (2023)

    Du P., Vishik A. On the Balmer spectrum of Morel-Voevodsky category, arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.09077 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  24. [32]

    The algebraic and geometric theory of quadratic forms, American Mathematical Soc

    Elman R., Karpenko N., Merkurjev A. The algebraic and geometric theory of quadratic forms, American Mathematical Soc. (2008)

    2008

  25. [33]

    The Arason invariant and 2 algebraic cycles, J

    Esnault H., Kahn B., Levine M., Viehweg E. The Arason invariant and 2 algebraic cycles, J. Amer. Math. Soc., pp. 73–118 (1998)

    1998

  26. [34]

    J-invariant of hermitian forms over quadratic extensions, Pacific Journal of Mathematics, pp

    Fino R. J-invariant of hermitian forms over quadratic extensions, Pacific Journal of Mathematics, pp. 375–404 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    Introduction to intersection theory in algebraic geometry, American Mathematical Soc

    Fulton W. Introduction to intersection theory in algebraic geometry, American Mathematical Soc. (1984)

    1984

  28. [36]

    Orthogonal involutions on algebras of degree 16 and the Killing form of E_8 , Contemp

    Garibaldi S. Orthogonal involutions on algebras of degree 16 and the Killing form of E_8 , Contemp. Math. 493, Amer. Math. Soc., pp. 131–162 (2009)

    2009

  29. [37]

    Cohomological invariants in Galois cohomology, No

    Garibaldi S., Merkurjev A., Serre J.-P. Cohomological invariants in Galois cohomology, No. 28, Amer. Math. Soc. (2003)

    2003

  30. [38]

    Shells of twisted flag varieties and the Rost invariant, Duke Math

    Garibaldi S., Petrov V., Semenov N. Shells of twisted flag varieties and the Rost invariant, Duke Math. J. 165, pp. 285–339 (2016)

    2016

  31. [39]

    Degree 5 invariant of E _8 , Int

    Garibaldi S., Semenov N. Degree 5 invariant of E _8 , Int. Math. Res. Not. 2010.19, pp. 3746–3762 (2010)

    2010

  32. [40]

    Morava K-theory of orthogonal groups and motives of projective quadrics, Adv

    Geldhauser N., Lavrenov A., Petrov V., Sechin P. Morava K-theory of orthogonal groups and motives of projective quadrics, Adv. Math. 446, 109657 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    Morava J -invariant, arXiv:2409.14099 (2024)

    Geldhauser N., Lavrenov A., Petrov V., Sechin P. Morava J -invariant, arXiv:2409.14099 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    J -invariant of linear algebraic groups of outer type, arXiv:2205.02884 (2022)

    Geldhauser N., Zhykhovich M. J -invariant of linear algebraic groups of outer type, arXiv:2205.02884 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    The Rost nilpotence theorem for geometrically rational surfaces, Invent

    Gille S. The Rost nilpotence theorem for geometrically rational surfaces, Invent. Math. 181(1) (2010)

    2010

  36. [44]

    On the Rost nilpotence theorem for threefolds, Bull

    Gille S. On the Rost nilpotence theorem for threefolds, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 50(1), pp. 63–72 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    Rost Nilpotence and Free Theories, Doc

    Gille S., Vishik A. Rost Nilpotence and Free Theories, Doc. Math. 23, pp. 1635–1657 (2018)

    2018

  38. [46]

    Lifting of coefficients for Chow motives of quadrics, in: Quadratic Forms, Linear Algebraic Groups, and Cohomology, Dev

    Haution O. Lifting of coefficients for Chow motives of quadrics, in: Quadratic Forms, Linear Algebraic Groups, and Cohomology, Dev. Math. 18, Springer, New York, pp. 239–247 (2010)

    2010

  39. [47]

    Isotropy of quadratic forms over the function field of a quadric, Math

    Hoffmann D. Isotropy of quadratic forms over the function field of a quadric, Math. Z. 220, pp. 461–476 (1995)

    1995

  40. [48]

    On the Picard group of the stable A ^1 -homotopy category , Topology 44(3), pp

    Hu P. On the Picard group of the stable A ^1 -homotopy category , Topology 44(3), pp. 609–640 (2005)

    2005

  41. [49]

    Fields of u -invariant 9, Ann

    Izhboldin O. Fields of u -invariant 9, Ann. Math. 153, pp. 529–587 (2001)

    2001

  42. [50]

    Quadratic forms with absolutely maximal splitting, Contemp

    Izhboldin O., Vishik A. Quadratic forms with absolutely maximal splitting, Contemp. Math. 272, pp. 103–125 (2000)

    2000

  43. [51]

    K-theory of the Weil transfer functor, K-Theory 20, pp

    Joukhovitski S. K-theory of the Weil transfer functor, K-Theory 20, pp. 1–21 (2000)

    2000

  44. [52]

    A descent problem for quadratic forms, Duke Math

    Kahn B. A descent problem for quadratic forms, Duke Math. J. 80(1), pp. 139–155 (1995)

    1995

  45. [53]

    horizontal

    Kahn B. On “horizontal” invariants attached to quadratic forms, in: Algebra and Number Theory, Hindustan Book Agency (2005)

    2005

  46. [54]

    Unramified cohomology of quadrics, I, Am

    Kahn B., Rost M., Sujatha R. Unramified cohomology of quadrics, I, Am. J. Math. 120(4), pp. 841–891 (1998)

    1998

  47. [55]

    Motivic cohomology and unramified cohomology of quadrics, J

    Kahn B., Sujatha R. Motivic cohomology and unramified cohomology of quadrics, J. Eur. Math. Soc. 2(2), pp. 145–177 (2000)

    2000

  48. [56]

    Unramified cohomology of quadrics, II, Duke Mathematical Journal, Vol

    Kahn B., Sujatha R. Unramified cohomology of quadrics, II, Duke Mathematical Journal, Vol. 106, No. 3, pp. 449-484 (2001)

    2001

  49. [57]

    Weil transfer of algebraic cycles, Indag

    Karpenko N. Weil transfer of algebraic cycles, Indag. Math. 11(1), pp. 73–86 (2000)

    2000

  50. [58]

    On the first Witt index of quadratic forms, Invent

    Karpenko N. On the first Witt index of quadratic forms, Invent. Math. 153(2), pp. 455–462 (2003)

    2003

  51. [59]

    Upper motives of outer algebraic groups, in: Quadratic Forms, Linear Algebraic Groups, and Cohomology, Dev

    Karpenko N. Upper motives of outer algebraic groups, in: Quadratic Forms, Linear Algebraic Groups, and Cohomology, Dev. Math. 18, Springer, pp. 249–258 (2010)

    2010

  52. [60]

    Canonical dimension, in: Proc

    Karpenko N. Canonical dimension, in: Proc. Int. Congr. Math., Vol. II, Hindustan Book Agency, pp. 146–161 (2010)

    2010

  53. [61]

    Upper motives of algebraic groups and incompressibility of Severi–Brauer varieties, J

    Karpenko N. Upper motives of algebraic groups and incompressibility of Severi–Brauer varieties, J. Reine Angew. Math. 677, pp. 179–198 (2013)

    2013

  54. [62]

    Chow groups of projective quadrics, Algebra i Analiz 2(3), pp

    Karpenko N., Merkurjev A. Chow groups of projective quadrics, Algebra i Analiz 2(3), pp. 218–235 (1990)

    1990

  55. [63]

    Rost projectors and Steenrod operations, Doc

    Karpenko N., Merkurjev A. Rost projectors and Steenrod operations, Doc. Math. 7, pp. 481–493 (2002)

    2002

  56. [64]

    Essential dimension of quadrics, Invent

    Karpenko N., Merkurjev A. Essential dimension of quadrics, Invent. Math. 153, pp. 361–372 (2003)

    2003

  57. [65]

    On standard norm varieties, Ann

    Karpenko N., Merkurjev A. On standard norm varieties, Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. 46(1), pp. 1–50 (2013)

    2013

  58. [66]

    Artin shapes, arXiv preprint arXiv: arXiv:2411.11800 (2024)

    Karpenko N., Zhu G. Artin shapes, arXiv preprint arXiv: arXiv:2411.11800 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  59. [67]

    The book of involutions, AMS Colloquium Publications 44, Amer

    Knus M.-A., Merkurjev A., Rost M., Tignol J.-P. The book of involutions, AMS Colloquium Publications 44, Amer. Math. Soc. (1998)

    1998

  60. [68]

    Generic splitting of quadratic forms I, Proc

    Knebusch M. Generic splitting of quadratic forms I, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 33(1), pp. 65–93 (1976)

    1976

  61. [69]

    Generic splitting of quadratic forms II, Proc

    Knebusch M. Generic splitting of quadratic forms II, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 34, pp. 1–31 (1977)

    1977

  62. [70]

    Sur le problème de descente des formes quadratiques, Arch

    Laghribi A. Sur le problème de descente des formes quadratiques, Arch. Math. 73:1, pp. 18–24 (1999)

    1999

  63. [71]

    A First Course in Noncommutative Rings, Springer Science & Business Media (2001)

    Lam T.\,Y. A First Course in Noncommutative Rings, Springer Science & Business Media (2001)

    2001

  64. [72]

    Introduction to Quadratic Forms over Fields, American Mathematical Society, Providence (2005)

    Lam T.\,Y. Introduction to Quadratic Forms over Fields, American Mathematical Society, Providence (2005)

    2005

  65. [73]

    Morava K-theory and Rost invariant, International Mathematics Research Notices, Volume 2025, Issue 8 (2025)

    Lavrenov A., Petrov V. Morava K-theory and Rost invariant, International Mathematics Research Notices, Volume 2025, Issue 8 (2025)

    2025

  66. [74]

    Comparison of cobordism theories, Journal of Algebra 322:9, pp

    Levine M. Comparison of cobordism theories, Journal of Algebra 322:9, pp. 3291–3317 (2009)

    2009

  67. [75]

    Algebraic cobordism, Springer Science & Business Media (2007)

    Levine M., Morel F. Algebraic cobordism, Springer Science & Business Media (2007)

    2007

  68. [76]

    Algebraic cobordism revisited, Invent

    Levine M., Pandharipande R. Algebraic cobordism revisited, Invent. Math. 176:1, pp. 63–130 (2009)

    2009

  69. [77]

    Quotients of MGL, their slices and their geometric parts, Doc

    Levine M., Tripathi G.\,S. Quotients of MGL, their slices and their geometric parts, Doc. Math., pp. 407–442 (2015). Extra vol.: Alexander S. Merkurjev's sixtieth birthday

    2015

  70. [78]

    Degree 2 cohomological invariants of linear algebraic groups, J

    Lourdeaux A. Degree 2 cohomological invariants of linear algebraic groups, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 226:10 (2022)

    2022

  71. [79]

    Projective homogeneous varieties birational to quadrics, Doc

    MacDonald M.\,L. Projective homogeneous varieties birational to quadrics, Doc. Math. 14, pp. 47–66 (2009)

    2009

  72. [80]

    Correspondences, motifs and monoidal transformations, Sb

    Manin Ju. Correspondences, motifs and monoidal transformations, Sb. Math. 6:4, pp. 439–470 (1968)

    1968

  73. [81]

    Lecture notes on motivic cohomology, American Mathematical Society (2006)

    Mazza C., Voevodsky V., Weibel C.\,A. Lecture notes on motivic cohomology, American Mathematical Society (2006)

    2006

  74. [82]

    On the norm residue symbol of degree 2, Dokl

    Merkurjev A.\,S. On the norm residue symbol of degree 2, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 261:3 (1981)

    1981

  75. [83]

    Simple algebras and quadratic forms, Izv

    Merkurjev A.\,S. Simple algebras and quadratic forms, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 55, pp. 218–224 (1991); Engl. transl.: Math. USSR Izv. 38, pp. 215–221 (1992)

    1991

  76. [84]

    K-cohomology of Severi-Brauer varieties and the norm residue homomorphism, Math

    Merkurjev A.\,S., Suslin A.\,A. K-cohomology of Severi-Brauer varieties and the norm residue homomorphism, Math. USSR Izv. 21, pp. 307–340 (1983)

    1983

  77. [85]

    The norm-residue homomorphism of degree 3, Izv

    Merkurjev A.\,S., Suslin A.\,A. The norm-residue homomorphism of degree 3, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR 54 (1990), pp. 339–356; Engl. transl.: Math. USSR Izv. 36, pp. 349–368 (1991)

    1990

  78. [86]

    Motivic cohomology of the simplicial motive of a Rost variety, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 214 pp

    Merkurjev A.\,S., Suslin A.\,A. Motivic cohomology of the simplicial motive of a Rost variety, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 214 pp. 2017–2026 (2010)

    2010

  79. [87]

    Algebraic K-theory and quadratic forms, Invent

    Milnor J. Algebraic K-theory and quadratic forms, Invent. Math. 9, pp. 318–344 (1970)

    1970

  80. [88]

    Milnor’s conjecture on quadratic forms and mod\; 2 motivic complexes, Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Universita di Padova, No

    Morel F. Milnor’s conjecture on quadratic forms and mod\; 2 motivic complexes, Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Universita di Padova, No. 114, pp. 63-101 (2005)

    2005

  81. [89]

    Homology of the full linear group over a local ring, and Milnor's K-theory, Math

    Nesterenko Yu.\,P., Suslin A.\,A. Homology of the full linear group over a local ring, and Milnor's K-theory, Math. USSR Izv. 34:1, pp. 121–145 (1990)

    1990

  82. [90]

    An exact sequence for K_*^M/2 with applications to quadratic forms , Ann

    Orlov D., Vishik A., Voevodsky V. An exact sequence for K_*^M/2 with applications to quadratic forms , Ann. Math., pp. 1–13 (2007)

    2007

  83. [91]

    On the algebraic K-theory of twisted flag varieties, K-Theory 8, pp

    Panin I. On the algebraic K-theory of twisted flag varieties, K-Theory 8, pp. 541–585 (1994)

    1994

  84. [92]

    Push-forwards in oriented cohomology theories of algebraic varieties, K-Theory Preprint Archives \#459 (2000)

    Panin I., Smirnov A. Push-forwards in oriented cohomology theories of algebraic varieties, K-Theory Preprint Archives \#459 (2000)

    2000

  85. [93]

    Reduced models of Albert algebras, Mathematische Zeitschrift 223:3 pp

    Petersson H., Racine M. Reduced models of Albert algebras, Mathematische Zeitschrift 223:3 pp. 367-386 (1996)

    1996

  86. [94]

    J-invariant of linear algebraic groups, Ann

    Petrov V., Semenov N., Zainoulline K. J-invariant of linear algebraic groups, Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. 41, pp. 1023–1053 (2008)

    2008

  87. [95]

    Cohomological invariants of algebraic stacks, Trans

    Pirisi R. Cohomological invariants of algebraic stacks, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 370:3, pp. 1885–1906 (2018)

    2018

  88. [96]

    Invariants cohomologiques: des formes quadratiques aux algèbres à involution, Publ

    Qu\'eguiner-Mathieu A. Invariants cohomologiques: des formes quadratiques aux algèbres à involution, Publ. Math. UFR Sci. Tech. Besançon, Univ. Franche-Comté, Besançon, pp. 1-10 (2002)

    2002

  89. [97]

    Cohomological Invariants for Orthogonal Involutions on Degree 8 Algebras, J

    Qu\'eguiner-Mathieu A., Tignol J.-P. Cohomological Invariants for Orthogonal Involutions on Degree 8 Algebras, J. K-Theory 9:2, pp. 333–358 (2012)

    2012

  90. [98]

    Higher algebraic K-theory: I, in: Higher K-Theories: Proc

    Quillen D. Higher algebraic K-theory: I, in: Higher K-Theories: Proc. Conf. Battelle Memorial Institute (1972), Springer, pp. 85–147 (2006)

    1972

  91. [99]

    Complex cobordism and stable homotopy groups of spheres, 2nd ed., AMS Chelsea Publishing, Providence (2004)

    Ravenel D. Complex cobordism and stable homotopy groups of spheres, 2nd ed., AMS Chelsea Publishing, Providence (2004)

    2004

  92. [100]

    Rost nilpotence and étale motivic cohomology, Adv

    Rosenschon A., Sawant A. Rost nilpotence and étale motivic cohomology, Adv. Math. 330, pp. 420–432 (2018)

    2018

  93. [101]

    On Hilbert Satz 90 for K_3 for quadratic extensions, Preprint (1986), https://www.math.uni-bielefeld.de/ rost/K3-88.html

    Rost M. On Hilbert Satz 90 for K_3 for quadratic extensions, Preprint (1986), https://www.math.uni-bielefeld.de/ rost/K3-88.html

    1986

  94. [102]

    Some new results on the Chow groups of quadrics, Preprint (1990), https://www.math.uni-bielefeld.de/ rost/data/chowqudr.pdf

    Rost M. Some new results on the Chow groups of quadrics, Preprint (1990), https://www.math.uni-bielefeld.de/ rost/data/chowqudr.pdf

    1990

  95. [103]

    The motive of a Pfister form, Preprint (1998), https://www.math.uni-bielefeld.de/ rost/data/motive.pdf

    Rost M. The motive of a Pfister form, Preprint (1998), https://www.math.uni-bielefeld.de/ rost/data/motive.pdf

    1998

  96. [104]

    On the basic correspondence of a splitting variety, Preprint (2007), https://www.math.uni-bielefeld.de/ rost/data/bkc-c.pdf

    Rost M. On the basic correspondence of a splitting variety, Preprint (2007), https://www.math.uni-bielefeld.de/ rost/data/bkc-c.pdf

    2007

  97. [105]

    Quadratic and Hermitian Forms, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, pp

    Scharlau W. Quadratic and Hermitian Forms, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 1–23 (2011)

    2011

  98. [106]

    Unramified Cohomology, Algebraic Cycles and Rationality, in: Farkas G

    Schreieder S. Unramified Cohomology, Algebraic Cycles and Rationality, in: Farkas G. et al. (eds), Rationality of Varieties, Progress in Mathematics, Vol. 342, Birkhäuser, pp. 345–388 (2021)

    2021

  99. [107]

    Hyperbolicity and Near Hyperbolicity of Quadratic Forms over Function Fields of Quadrics, Math

    Scully S. Hyperbolicity and Near Hyperbolicity of Quadratic Forms over Function Fields of Quadrics, Math. Ann. 372, 1437-1458 (2018)

    2018

  100. [108]

    On an Extension of Hoffmann’s Separation Theorem for Quadratic Forms, International Mathematics Research Notices, Vol

    Scully S. On an Extension of Hoffmann’s Separation Theorem for Quadratic Forms, International Mathematics Research Notices, Vol. 2022, Issue 14, pp. 11092-11147 (2022)

    2022

  101. [109]

    Chern Classes from Algebraic Morava K-Theories to Chow Groups, International Mathematics Research Notices, Volume 2018, Issue 15, pp

    Sechin P. Chern Classes from Algebraic Morava K-Theories to Chow Groups, International Mathematics Research Notices, Volume 2018, Issue 15, pp. 4675–4721 (2018)

    2018

  102. [110]

    On the Structure of Algebraic Cobordism, Advances in Mathematics, Volume 333, pp

    Sechin P. On the Structure of Algebraic Cobordism, Advances in Mathematics, Volume 333, pp. 314-349 (2018)

    2018

  103. [111]

    Chern Classes from Morava K-theories to p^n -Typical Oriented Theories, arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.09050 (2018)

    Sechin P. Chern Classes from Morava K-theories to p^n -Typical Oriented Theories, arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.09050 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  104. [112]

    in preparation

    Sechin P. in preparation

  105. [113]

    Applications of the Morava K-theory to algebraic groups, Annales Scientifiques de l'ENS (Ecole Normale Superieure), Vol

    Sechin P., Semenov N. Applications of the Morava K-theory to algebraic groups, Annales Scientifiques de l'ENS (Ecole Normale Superieure), Vol. 54, No. 4, pp. 945-990 (2021)

    2021

  106. [114]

    Motivic Construction of Cohomological Invariants, Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici, Vol

    Semenov N. Motivic Construction of Cohomological Invariants, Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici, Vol. 91 No. 1, pp. 163-202 (2016)

    2016

  107. [115]

    Integral motives, relative Krull–Schmidt principle, and Maranda-type theorems, Math

    Semenov N., Zhykhovich M. Integral motives, relative Krull–Schmidt principle, and Maranda-type theorems, Math. Ann., Volume 363, pp. 61-75 (2015)

    2015

  108. [116]

    Subtle Characteristic Classes, arXiv preprint arXiv: 1401.6661 (2014)

    Smirnov A., Vishik A. Subtle Characteristic Classes, arXiv preprint arXiv: 1401.6661 (2014)

    2014 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Sur les formes quadratiques d’indice zéro, C

    Springer T. Sur les formes quadratiques d’indice zéro, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Vol. 234, pp. 1517–1519 (1952)

    1952

  110. [118]

    Norm Varieties, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, Vol

    Suslin A., Joukhovitski S. Norm Varieties, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, Vol. 206, Issues 1–2, pp. 245–276 (2006)

    2006

  111. [119]

    K-theory of Quadric Hypersurfaces, Annals of Mathematics, Vol

    Swan R. K-theory of Quadric Hypersurfaces, Annals of Mathematics, Vol. 122, No. 1, pp. 113–153 (1985)

    1985

  112. [120]

    Cohomological Invariants of Central Simple Algebras with Involution, in: Colliot-Thélène J.-L., Garibaldi S., Sujatha R., Suresh V

    Tignol J.-P. Cohomological Invariants of Central Simple Algebras with Involution, in: Colliot-Thélène J.-L., Garibaldi S., Sujatha R., Suresh V. (eds), Quadratic Forms, Linear Algebraic Groups, and Cohomology, Developments in Mathematics, Vol. 18, Springer, New York, NY, pp. 5...

    2010

  113. [121]

    Repr\'esentations linéaires irr\'eductibles d’un groupe réductif sur un corps quelconque, J

    Tits J. Repr\'esentations linéaires irr\'eductibles d’un groupe réductif sur un corps quelconque, J. reine angew. Math., Vol. 247, pp. 196–220 (1971)

    1971

  114. [122]

    Milnor K-theory is the Simplest Part of Algebraic K-theory, K-theory, Vol

    Totaro B. Milnor K-theory is the Simplest Part of Algebraic K-theory, K-theory, Vol. 6, pp. 177–189 (1992)

    1992

  115. [123]

    Cohomological Invariants in Positive Characteristic, International Mathematics Research Notices, Vol

    Totaro B. Cohomological Invariants in Positive Characteristic, International Mathematics Research Notices, Vol. 2022, Issue 9, pp. 7152–7201 (2022)

    2022

  116. [124]

    Integral Motives of Quadrics, MPIM-preprint No

    Vishik A. Integral Motives of Quadrics, MPIM-preprint No. 1998-13, pp. 1–82 (1998)

    1998

  117. [125]

    Motives of Quadrics with Applications to the Theory of Quadratic Forms, in: Tignol JP

    Vishik A. Motives of Quadrics with Applications to the Theory of Quadratic Forms, in: Tignol JP. (eds) Geometric Methods in the Algebraic Theory of Quadratic Forms, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 1835, pp. 25-101 (2004)

    2004

  118. [126]

    Symmetric Operations in Algebraic Cobordism, Advances in Mathematics, Vol

    Vishik A. Symmetric Operations in Algebraic Cobordism, Advances in Mathematics, Vol. 213, No. 2, pp. 489–552 (2007)

    2007

  119. [127]

    Fields of u-invariant 2^r+1 , Algebra, Arithmetic, and Geometry: Volume II: In Honor of Yu

    Vishik A. Fields of u-invariant 2^r+1 , Algebra, Arithmetic, and Geometry: Volume II: In Honor of Yu. I. Manin, pp. 661–685 (2009)

    2009

  120. [128]

    Excellent Connections in the Motives of Quadrics, Annales scientifiques de l'Ecole normale supérieure, Vol

    Vishik A. Excellent Connections in the Motives of Quadrics, Annales scientifiques de l'Ecole normale supérieure, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 183–195 (2011)

    2011

  121. [129]

    Algebraic Cobordism as a Module over Lazard Ring, Mathematische Annalen, Vol

    Vishik A. Algebraic Cobordism as a Module over Lazard Ring, Mathematische Annalen, Vol. 363, No. 3, pp. 973–983 (2015)

    2015

  122. [130]

    Symmetric Operations for All Primes and Steenrod Operations in Algebraic Cobordism, Compositio Mathematica, Vol

    Vishik A. Symmetric Operations for All Primes and Steenrod Operations in Algebraic Cobordism, Compositio Mathematica, Vol. 152, No. 5, pp. 1052–1070 (2016)

    2016

  123. [131]

    Stable and Unstable Operations in Algebraic Cobordism, Ann

    Vishik A. Stable and Unstable Operations in Algebraic Cobordism, Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér., Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 561–630 (2019)

    2019

  124. [132]

    Affine Quadrics and the Picard Group of the Motivic Category, Compositio Mathematica, Vol

    Vishik A. Affine Quadrics and the Picard Group of the Motivic Category, Compositio Mathematica, Vol. 155, No. 8, pp. 1500–1520 (2019)

    2019

  125. [133]

    Operations and Poly-operations in Algebraic Cobordism, Advances in Mathematics, Vol

    Vishik A. Operations and Poly-operations in Algebraic Cobordism, Advances in Mathematics, Vol. 366, Article 107066, pp. 1-56 (2020)

    2020

  126. [134]

    Isotropic Motives, Journal of the Institute of Mathematics of Jussieu, Vol

    Vishik A. Isotropic Motives, Journal of the Institute of Mathematics of Jussieu, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 1271–1330 (2022)

    2022

  127. [135]

    Isotropic and Numerical Equivalence for Chow Groups and Morava K-theories, Inventiones mathematicae, Volume 237, pp

    Vishik A. Isotropic and Numerical Equivalence for Chow Groups and Morava K-theories, Inventiones mathematicae, Volume 237, pp. 779–808 (2024)

    2024

  128. [136]

    Algebraic Cobordisms of a Pfister Quadric, Journal of the London Mathematical Society, Volume 76, Issue 3, pp

    Vishik A., Yagita N. Algebraic Cobordisms of a Pfister Quadric, Journal of the London Mathematical Society, Volume 76, Issue 3, pp. 586–604 (2007)

    2007

  129. [137]

    Motivic Splitting Lemma, Documenta Mathematica, Volume 13, pp

    Vishik A., Zainoulline K. Motivic Splitting Lemma, Documenta Mathematica, Volume 13, pp. 81–96 (2008)

    2008

  130. [138]

    Bloch-Kato Conjecture for /2 -coefficients and Algebraic Morava K-theories, preprint (1995)

    Voevodsky V. Bloch-Kato Conjecture for /2 -coefficients and Algebraic Morava K-theories, preprint (1995)

    1995

  131. [139]

    A1-Homotopy Theory, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Vol

    Voevodsky V. A1-Homotopy Theory, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Vol. 1, pp. 579–604 (1998)

    1998

  132. [140]

    Reduced Power Operations in Motivic Cohomology, Publ

    Voevodsky V. Reduced Power Operations in Motivic Cohomology, Publ. Math. IHES, Vol. 98, pp. 1–57 (2003)

    2003

  133. [141]

    Motivic Cohomology with Z/2 -coefficients, Publ

    Voevodsky V. Motivic Cohomology with Z/2 -coefficients, Publ. Math. IHES, Vol. 98, pp. 59–104 (2003)

    2003

  134. [142]

    On Motivic Cohomology with /l -coefficients, Ann

    Voevodsky V. On Motivic Cohomology with /l -coefficients, Ann. of Math., Vol. 174, pp. 401–438 (2011)

    2011

  135. [143]

    Abel-Jacobi Map, Integral Hodge Classes and Decomposition of the Diagonal, J

    Voisin C. Abel-Jacobi Map, Integral Hodge Classes and Decomposition of the Diagonal, J. Algebraic Geom., Vol. 22, pp. 141–174 (2013)

    2013

  136. [144]

    Unirational Threefolds with No Universal Codimension 2 Cycle, Inventiones mathematicae, Vol

    Voisin C. Unirational Threefolds with No Universal Codimension 2 Cycle, Inventiones mathematicae, Vol. 201, pp. 207–237 (2015)

    2015

  137. [145]

    PhD Dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, in progress

    Wohlschlager A. PhD Dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, in progress

  138. [146]

    Algebraic BP-theory and Norm Varieties, Hokkaido Math

    Yagita N. Algebraic BP-theory and Norm Varieties, Hokkaido Math. J., Vol. 41, pp. 275–316 (2012)

    2012

  139. [147]

    The Gamma Filtrations for the Spin Groups, Kodai Mathematical Journal, Vol

    Yagita, N. The Gamma Filtrations for the Spin Groups, Kodai Mathematical Journal, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 137–165 (2021)

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.