Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 93 references

An extremely metal-poor Lyman $\alpha$ emitter candidate at $z=6$ revealed through absorption spectroscopy

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A z=6 Lyman-alpha emitter may be the most metal-poor galaxy yet seen.

desk verdict A careful, well-presented candidate: absorption-based [Z/H]<-3 for a proximate LAE at z=6, but the limit inherits an unquantified N_HI that makes the 'extremely metal-poor' claim a placeholder until confirmation. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.01499 v2 pith:I35LAKIF submitted 2025-05-02 astro-ph.GA

Dominika Ďurovčíková , Anna-Christina Eilers , Robert A. Simcoe , Louise Welsh , Romain A. Meyer , Jorryt Matthee , Emma V. Ryan-Weber , Minghao Yue
show 5 more authors
Harley Katz Sindhu Satyavolu George Becker Frederick B. Davies Emanuele Paolo Farina
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords Lymanalphaemitterquasarabsorptionspectroscopysub-dampedsystemsextremelymetal-poorgalaxiesPopulationIIIstarsEpochofReionizationcircumgalacticmediumproximityzone
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports a Lyman-$\alpha$ emitter (LAE) candidate found in MUSE observations just 29 kiloparsecs in front of the quasar PSO J158-14 at $z=6.0685$, and argues that this galaxy, not neutral intergalactic gas, is responsible for the quasar's damping-wing-like absorption profile. The LAE's Ly-$\alpha$ emission at $z=6.0323$ aligns with the outer edge of the quasar's proximity zone, and a Voigt profile at that redshift with a neutral hydrogen column density of $\log N_{\rm HI}/{\rm cm}^{-2}\approx 19.7$ (a sub-damped Lyman-$\alpha$ system) reproduces the observed transmission. In 10.2 hours of co-added FIRE and X-Shooter spectroscopy, no low-ionization metal lines are seen at the LAE redshift; after photoionization corrections, the stacked spectrum puts the absorber's metallicity below $[Z/H] < -3$, i.e. less than one-thousandth of solar. If correct, this is the most metal-poor high-redshift galaxy candidate found through absorption spectroscopy and a promising site to search for Population III stars.

What carries the argument

The argument rides on three linked pieces. First is the LAE itself: a compact Ly-$\alpha$ line detected in the MUSE data cube at $z_{\rm LAE}=6.0323$, spatially offset 29 pkpc from the quasar, whose redshift fixes where an associated absorber would sit. Second is the Voigt-profile damping-wing model of the quasar's Ly-$\alpha$ transmission, which at that redshift requires a sub-DLA (a neutral-hydrogen column between $\log N_{\rm HI}/{\rm cm}^{-2}\sim19$ and $20.3$, optically thick to Ly-$\alpha$ but not fully self-shielding) with $\log N_{\rm HI}/{\rm cm}^{-2}\approx19.7$ and $b\lesssim50$ km/s. Third is the metallicity measurement: low-ionization absorption regions in the continuum-normalized quasar spectrum are stacked, and forward-modeled Voigt profiles with solar abundance ratios and photoionization ionization corrections show that the absence of absorption at the LAE redshift pushes the metallicity below $[Z/H] < -3$.

What would settle it

A spectrum with roughly double the current exposure time and higher resolution that reaches a 3-$\sigma$ sensitivity below $[Z/H]=-3$ for Si II 1260 at $z=6.0323$ would settle the claim: detection of those lines would raise the metallicity limit, while a resolved damping-wing profile with an independently fitted column density very different from $10^{19.7}$ cm$^{-2}$ would break the association. A JWST spectrum of the LAE itself that measures emission-line metallicities or reveals a different redshift for the continuum source would also test the identification.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the damping-wing-like profile in the spectrum of quasar PSO J158-14 is produced by a proximate sub-damped Lyman-$\alpha$ absorption system at the redshift of a newly identified Lyman-$\alpha$ emitter, rather than by a large neutral fraction in the intergalactic medium. The Ly-$\alpha$ line from the foreground source at $z_{\rm LAE}=6.0323$ sits at the outer edge of the quasar's proximity zone, and modeling the absorption as a single Voigt component at that redshift yields $\log N_{\rm HI}/{\rm cm}^{-2}\approx19.7$ for a broadening parameter $b=5$ km/s, a value typical of low-metallicity absorbers. The deep co-added spectrum shows no low-ionization metal absorption (Si II, C II, O I, Al II, Mg II) at the LAE redshift, and stacking those line regions with inverse-variance weighting gives an upper limit $[Z/H] < -3$ after applying photoionization-based ionization corrections of $\lesssim0.3$ dex. The paper therefore identifies this system as an extremely metal-poor galaxy candidate whose circumgalactic gas may be essentially unenriched, and notes that the absorber truncates the quasar's proximity zone, so quasar lifetimes inferred from that zone are underestimated.

Load-bearing premise

The result rests on the assumption that the damping-wing-like shape in the quasar spectrum is caused by a single foreground sub-DLA at the LAE's redshift with column density $\log N_{\rm HI}/{\rm cm}^{-2}\approx19.7$, not by a neutral IGM patch, continuum mis-normalization, or another absorber; the $[Z/H]$ limit scales directly with that assumed column density, for which no uncertainty is quoted.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If confirmed at higher resolution, this becomes the most metal-poor absorption-selected system known at $z\sim6$, with a metallicity below one-thousandth of the solar value.
  • The quasar's Ly-alpha damping wing would be explained by the foreground absorber, removing the need to invoke a large neutral IGM patch along this sightline.
  • Because the absorber truncates the quasar's proximity zone, quasar lifetimes inferred from the size of that zone for PSO J158-14 are underestimates.
  • This is the lowest absorption-based metallicity limit yet reported for a high-redshift galaxy candidate, lower than emission-line-based limits such as $[O/H]<-2.4$ for other metal-poor systems, although emission and absorption probe different gas phases.
  • Deeper, higher-resolution spectroscopy of the quasar could detect the weak metal lines predicted at $[Z/H]\sim-3$ and directly test the association of the absorption with the LAE.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This detection suggests a search strategy that absorption-line surveys have been missing: locate LAEs at the edges of quasar proximity zones in deep integral-field data, then target the quasars for metallicity stacking; metal-selected surveys would systematically skip such pristine systems.
  • If the LAE's gas is genuinely this metal-poor, its Ly-alpha emission could be powered by very young stars or by fluorescence from the quasar; observations with JWST targeting the LAE itself could look for Population III signatures such as strong He II emission, which the current data do not cover.
  • The sightline at 29 pkpc likely probes the galaxy's circumgalactic medium rather than its star-forming body, so the galaxy's overall stellar metallicity could be higher than $[Z/H]<-3$; the paper's own caution about emission-versus-absorption phase differences points the same way.
  • A natural test would be to apply the same MUSE-plus-stacking method to other $z\sim6$ quasars with unexplained damping wings, to estimate how often such metal-poor proximate absorbers masquerade as neutral IGM patches.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper reports the discovery of a Lyα emitter (LAE) candidate at z=6.0323 in MUSE observations of the quasar PSO J158-14 at z_QSO=6.0685, at a projected separation of about 29 pkpc. The authors argue that this LAE is associated with a proximate sub-DLA with log N_HI ~ 19.7 that produces the quasar's damping-wing-like Lyα transmission profile. Using 10.2 hours of co-added Magellan/FIRE and VLT/X-Shooter spectroscopy, they stack low-ionization absorption lines at the LAE redshift, detect no absorption, and after applying CLOUDY ionization corrections derive a metallicity limit of [Z/H] < -3. They conclude that this is an extremely metal-poor galaxy candidate that may host signatures of Population III stars, and note that the quasar's proximity zone may be truncated by the absorber.

Significance. If confirmed, this would be a notable result: an absorption-based metallicity limit below [Z/H] = -3 at z ~ 6, deeper than current emission-line-based metal-poor galaxy constraints at high redshift, and a rare case where a MUSE-detected LAE is plausibly associated with a proximate absorber. The analysis is transparent in several respects: the co-added spectra are made public, the stacking procedure is clearly described, foreground absorption systems are masked, and the CLOUDY grid includes the quasar radiation field. The principal weakness is that the headline metallicity limit inherits a direct, unquantified dependence on the H I column density derived from the damping-wing fit, and the statistical confidence level of the limit is not stated. These issues are fixable but load-bearing for the central claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 2.1 and Eq. (1)] The H I column density log N_HI = 19.7 is presented as a single-value Voigt-profile fit to the damping wing, with no quoted uncertainty, no fit statistic, and no marginalization over continuum normalization errors or a residual neutral IGM contribution. Because Eq. (1) translates log N_HI directly into [Z/H], a 0.5 dex lower column (for example log N_HI = 19.2, which appears compatible with the observed profile given the noise and the IGM degeneracy) would shift the metallicity limit to [Z/H] < -2.5, which would no longer meet the 'extremely metal-poor' threshold of -3. Please provide a posterior or delta-chi-squared grid over N_HI that marginalizes over continuum and IGM parameters, and quote the resulting column-density range.
  2. [Sec. 2.1] The absorber is assumed to be at the Lyα centroid redshift z_LAE = 6.0323, but Lyα emission centroids are often offset from the systemic velocity by hundreds of km/s, and the absorption system's systemic redshift is not independently measured. If the true absorber redshift differs from the assumed value, the stacked metal-line search in Fig. 4 is diluted and the non-detection may not constrain gas associated with the LAE. Please quantify the allowed velocity offset, for example by scanning the stack over a range of redshifts or by using an additional redshift tracer.
  3. [Sec. 2.2 and Fig. 4] The upper limit [Z/H] < -3 is stated without a confidence level. The description that no absorption is seen 'beyond the noise level' does not specify whether this is a 1, 2, or 3 sigma limit, and the limit does not appear to include systematic errors from continuum normalization or from the uncertainty in N_HI. Please state the confidence level and provide the full error budget, including the propagation of the N_HI uncertainty into the final limit.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract says '>10 hour medium-resolution spectrum' while the body quotes 10.2 hours; please make the numbers consistent.
  2. [Eq. (1)] The notation log(N_Z/N_HI)_sun is ambiguous because the left-hand side refers to a specific ion column density N_Zi while the solar reference is per element; please define the ionization state and element explicitly and clarify the meaning of [Z/H] as a total metal-to-hydrogen ratio.
  3. [Sec. 2.1] The statement that the inferred N_HI is insensitive to b for b < 50 km/s is not demonstrated; a short description of how N_HI changes with b, or a small fit grid, would strengthen the claim.
  4. [Fig. 1 caption] The blue Voigt profile mentioned in the text is not explicitly labeled in the figure caption; please add a label so the reader can identify it.
  5. [Sec. 3] The statement that the quasar lifetime estimate is underestimated is speculative and is not quantitatively supported by the data presented here; please soften or support this claim.
  6. [Sec. 2.1] The <0.2% probability of an IGM neutral patch is cited from Satyavolu et al. (2023), but this is a model-dependent estimate; please note that this prior does not automatically cover all continuum mis-normalization or small-scale IGM fluctuations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity found: the [Z/H]<−3 limit rests on an independent metal-line non-detection, with the H I column as a standard fitted input rather than a re-labeled prediction.

full rationale

The derivation of the central claim is self-contained in the sense relevant to circularity. The reported metallicity limit has two independent inputs: (i) the H I column density log N_HI/cm^-2 ≈ 19.7 from a Voigt/damping-wing fit to the quasar's Lyα transmission profile, and (ii) the non-detection of low-ionization metal absorption in a 10.2-hour stacked spectrum. Equation (1) is a forward-modeling abundance conversion, not a tautology: given N_HI and solar abundance ratios, the absence of metal lines sets an upper limit on [Z/H], and the paper never uses [Z/H] to infer N_HI nor uses the metal non-detection to identify the LAE. The LAE itself is identified from independent MUSE emission-line data and HST non-detections, with its redshift matching the assumed absorber position. There are self-citations in the argument—notably Satyavolu et al. 2023 for the <0.2% probability of an IGM neutral patch and Durovčíková et al. 2020 for continuum fitting—but these are not load-bearing in a circular way: the cited probability is a simulation-based external result with stated assumptions, and the central metal-line non-detection is a new observable presented in this paper. The paper also explicitly flags that high-resolution spectroscopy is required to confirm the weak metal lines and that direct LAE spectroscopy is needed to confirm the metallicity. The main caveat is systematic rather than circular: log N_HI has no quoted uncertainty, and because Eq. (1) is linear in log N_HI, a lower true column would weaken the [Z/H] limit. That is a robustness concern, not a reduction of the result to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central result rests on an assumed H I column density fitted to the damping wing, a single-line redshift identification for the LAE, a solar abundance pattern, and CLOUDY-based ionization corrections. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • H I column density log N_HI = 19.7 (dex)
    Chosen to reproduce the observed damping wing of PSO J158-14 in Fig. 1; used in Eq. 1 to convert the metal non-detection into the [Z/H] limit. No uncertainty is quoted.
  • Doppler broadening parameter b = 5 km/s
    Assumed to lie in the typical range for low-metallicity absorbers; the authors note results are insensitive to b below 50 km/s, so this is a minor parameter.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The detected single emission line is Ly-alpha at z = 6.0323
    Based on absence of continuum in HST imaging, EW > 33 Angstrom, and line asymmetry; no other emission lines are available to confirm the line identification.
  • domain assumption The absorber is physically located at the LAE redshift and at a projected distance of 29 pkpc
    The proximity in redshift and sky position is used to link the damping wing absorber to the LAE; no direct measurement of the absorber systemic redshift exists.
  • domain assumption Solar abundance pattern for converting metal column density limits to [Z/H]
    Adopted in Eq. 1; the authors acknowledge this limits the analysis to solar relative abundances.
  • domain assumption CLOUDY photoionization models with HM12 UV background, CMB, cosmic rays, and quasar radiation describe the absorber ionization state
    Ionization corrections up to 0.3 dex are derived from the CLOUDY grid; the corrections are small but model-dependent.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of An extremely metal-poor Lyman $\alpha$ emitter candidate at $z=6$ revealed through absorption spectroscopy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/I35LAKIF

@misc{pith2026250501499,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: An extremely metal-poor Lyman $\alpha$ emitter candidate at $z=6$ revealed through absorption spectroscopy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/I35LAKIF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.01499}
}
abstract

We report the discovery of a Lyman $\alpha$ emitter (LAE) candidate in the immediate foreground of the quasar PSO J158-14 at $z_{\rm QSO}=6.0685$ at a projected distance $\sim29\ {\rm pkpc}$ that is associated with an extremely metal-poor absorption system. This system was found in archival observations of the quasar field with the Very Large Telescope/Multi-Unit Spectroscopic Explorer (VLT/MUSE) and was previously missed in searches of absorption systems using quasar absorption line spectroscopy as it imparts no detectable metal absorption lines on the background quasar spectrum. The detected Ly$\alpha$ emission line at a redshift of $z_{\rm LAE}=6.0323$ is well aligned with the outer edge of the quasar's proximity zone and can plausibly cause its observed damping wing if it is associated with a proximate sub-damped Ly$\alpha$ absorption system with a column density of $\log {N_{\rm HI} / {\rm cm}^{-2}} \approx 19.7$. A $>10$ hour medium-resolution spectrum of the quasar observed with the Magellan/Folded-port InfraRed Echellette (FIRE) and VLT/X-Shooter spectrographs reveals a metallicity constraint of ${\rm [Z/H]} < -3$. Such low metallicity makes this system an extremely metal-poor galaxy candidate and provides an exciting site to study possible signatures of Population III stars.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.01499 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left: A smoothed, PSF-subtracted SNR image (SMOOTH[χ]) from MUSE showing the newly identified LAE in the foreground of the quasar PSO J158-14 (offset by −1500 km/s from the Lyα emission of the quasar). Right: The LAE spectrum from the original (not PSF-subtracted) MUSE data cube extracted over the contour shown in the left panel is shown in red (1σ and 2σ uncertainties shown as shaded red regions). The quasar spectr… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Archival imaging data of the quasar field from HST. Left: It is unlikely that this emission is not Lyα as no foreground emission is detected by HST ACS/WFC imag￾ing with the F555W filter at a limiting magnitude of 26.88. Right: A non-detection in the F850LP filter at a limiting magnitude of 25.98 is consistent with the Lyα line flux mea￾sured in MUSE. evidence of neutral islands and damping wings persist￾ing at z < … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Top: A deep (10.2 hr) medium-resolution J-band calibrated spectrum of the quasar PSO J158-14, observed with the Magellan/FIRE and VLT/X-Shooter spectrographs. This spectrum was further continuum normalized (see main text) and used to stack regions corresponding to low-ionization absorption lines (shown as vertical red lines) that could be associated with the foreground LAE (marked by the blue vertical line). The ora… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: Metallicity constraint on the newly found proximate absorption system. Here we show the inverse-variance￾weighted stack of low-ionization absorption line regions in the continuum normalized spectrum of PSO J158-14, in terms of the velocity shift from the quasar’s…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    ؋ v6ɠ S|k |Dܔi ڈ #wS'?X C( x- t^ލa /YxɂS ';GĆ G@gK O N H N H N ȝ ߏ4dS X +H\

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    arXiv 2020

  4. [4]

    L., & Norman, M

    Abel, T., Bryan, G. L., & Norman, M. L. 2002, Science, 295, 93, 10.1126/science.295.5552.93

    doi:10.1126/science.295.5552.93 2002

  5. [5]

    J., & Scott, P

    Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 47, 481, 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222

    arXiv 2009

  6. [6]

    2010, in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III , Vol

    Bacon, R., Accardo, M., Adjali, L., et al. 2010, in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III , Vol. 7735 (SPIE), 131--139, 10.1117/12.856027

    doi:10.1117/12.856027 2010

  7. [7]

    2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 885, 59, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4129

    Bañados, E., Rauch, M., Decarli, R., et al. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 885, 59, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4129

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4129 2019

  8. [8]

    D., Bolton, J

    Becker, G. D., Bolton, J. S., Zhu, Y., & Hashemi, S. 2024, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 533, 1525, 10.1093/mnras/stae1918

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1918 2024

Show all 93 references
  1. [9]

    D., Sargent, W

    Becker, G. D., Sargent, W. L. W., Rauch, M., & Calverley, A. P. 2011, The Astrophysical Journal, 735, 93, 10.1088/0004-637X/735/2/93

    2011 doi

  2. [10]

    D., Pettini, M., Rafelski, M., et al

    Becker, G. D., Pettini, M., Rafelski, M., et al. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 883, 163, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3eb5

    2019 doi

  3. [11]

    C., & Christlieb, N

    Beers, T. C., & Christlieb, N. 2005, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 43, 531, 10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134057

    2005

  4. [12]

    Berg, T. A. M., Fumagalli, M., D'Odorico, V., et al. 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 502, 4009, 10.1093/mnras/stab184

    2021 doi

  5. [13]

    Bosman, S. E. I., Fan, X., Jiang, L., et al. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 10.1093/mnras/sty1344

    2018 doi

  6. [14]

    Bosman, S. E. I., Davies, F. B., Becker, G. D., et al. 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 514, 55, 10.1093/mnras/stac1046

    2022 doi

  7. [15]

    2017, Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana, 88, 671

    Bromm, V. 2017, Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana, 88, 671. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MmSAI..88..671B

    2017

  8. [16]

    J., Katz, H., Witten, C., et al

    Cameron, A. J., Katz, H., Witten, C., et al. 2024, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 534, 523, 10.1093/mnras/stae1547

    2024 doi

  9. [17]

    2000, The Astrophysical Journal, 542, L75, 10.1086/312937

    Cen, R., & Haiman, Z. 2000, The Astrophysical Journal, 542, L75, 10.1086/312937

    2000 doi

  10. [18]

    2023, Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica, 59, 327, 10.22201/ia.01851101p.2023.59.02.12

    Chatzikos, M., Bianchi, S., Camilloni, F., et al. 2023, Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica, 59, 327, 10.22201/ia.01851101p.2023.59.02.12

    2023 doi

  11. [19]

    C., Shanks, T., et al

    Chehade, B., Carnall, A. C., Shanks, T., et al. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 478, 1649, 10.1093/mnras/sty690

    2018 doi

  12. [20]

    C., Rudie, G

    Cooke, R., Pettini, M., Steidel, C. C., Rudie, G. C., & Nissen, P. E. 2011, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 417, 1534, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19365.x

    2011

  13. [21]

    C., Scholte, D., et al

    Cullen, F., Carnall, A. C., Scholte, D., et al. 2025, The JWST EXCELS survey: an extremely metal-poor galaxy at \ z=8.271\ hosting an unusual population of massive stars, arXiv, 10.48550/arXiv.2501.11099

    2025 doi arXiv

  14. [22]

    B., Bañados, E., Hennawi, J

    Davies, F. B., Bañados, E., Hennawi, J. F., & Bosman, S. E. I. 2023 a , Possible Contamination of the Intergalactic Medium Damping Wing in ULAS J1342 +0928 by Proximate Damped Ly \ alpha\ Absorption , 10.48550/arXiv.2312.06747

    2023 doi arXiv

  15. [23]

    L., Ryan-Weber, E., D'Odorico, V., et al

    Davies, R. L., Ryan-Weber, E., D'Odorico, V., et al. 2023 b , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 521, 289, 10.1093/mnras/stac3662

    2023 doi

  16. [24]

    2018, Astronomy &amp; Astrophysics, Volume 613, id.L2, NUMPAGES 4 /NUMPAGES pp., 613, L2, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833034

    De Cia, A. 2018, Astronomy &amp; Astrophysics, Volume 613, id.L2, NUMPAGES 4 /NUMPAGES pp., 613, L2, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833034

    2018 doi

  17. [25]

    2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 863, L29, 10.3847/2041-8213/aad7b7

    D'Odorico, V., Feruglio, C., Ferrara, A., et al. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 863, L29, 10.3847/2041-8213/aad7b7

    2018 doi

  18. [26]

    D., et al

    D'Odorico, V., Banados, E., Becker, G. D., et al. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 523, 1399, 10.1093/mnras/stad1468

    2023 doi

  19. [27]

    2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 512, 2389, 10.1093/mnras/stac545

    D’Odorico, V., Finlator, K., Cristiani, S., et al. 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 512, 2389, 10.1093/mnras/stac545

    2022 doi

  20. [28]

    B., & Hennawi, J

    Eilers, A.-C., Davies, F. B., & Hennawi, J. F. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 864, 53, 10.3847/1538-4357/aad4fd

    2018 doi

  21. [29]

    F., Decarli, R., et al

    Eilers, A.-C., Hennawi, J. F., Decarli, R., et al. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 900, 37, 10.3847/1538-4357/aba52e

    2020 doi

  22. [30]

    Fan, X., Bañados, E., & Simcoe, R. A. 2023, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 61, 373, 10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-102455

    2023 doi

  23. [31]

    A., Becker, R

    Fan, X., Strauss, M. A., Becker, R. H., et al. 2006, The Astronomical Journal, 132, 117, 10.1086/504836

    2006 doi

  24. [32]

    P., Venemans, B

    Farina, E. P., Venemans, B. P., Decarli, R., et al. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 848, 78, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8df4

    2017 doi

  25. [33]

    J., Korista, K

    Ferland, G. J., Korista, K. T., Verner, D. A., et al. 1998, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 110, 761, 10.1086/316190

    1998 doi

  26. [34]

    Frebel, A., & Norris, J. E. 2015, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 53, 631, 10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122423

    2015 doi

  27. [35]

    P., Chisholm, J., et al

    Fujimoto, S., Naidu, R. P., Chisholm, J., et al. 2025, GLIMPSE : An ultra-faint \ simeq\ 10\ \ 5\ \ \ M \_\ odot\ \ Pop III Galaxy Candidate and First Constraints on the Pop III UV Luminosity Function at \ z simeq6-7\ , arXiv, 10.48550/arXiv.2501.11678

    2025 doi arXiv

  28. [36]

    M., & Prochaska, J

    Fumagalli, M., O'Meara, J. M., & Prochaska, J. X. 2011, Science, 334, 1245, 10.1126/science.1213581

    2011 doi

  29. [37]

    2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 455, 4100, 10.1093/mnras/stv2616

    ---. 2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 455, 4100, 10.1093/mnras/stv2616

    2016 doi

  30. [38]

    E., & Peterson, B

    Gunn, J. E., & Peterson, B. A. 1965, The Astrophysical Journal, 142, 1633, 10.1086/148444

    1965 doi

  31. [39]

    2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 746, 125, 10.1088/0004-637X/746/2/125

    Haardt, F., & Madau, P. 2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 746, 125, 10.1088/0004-637X/746/2/125

    2012 doi

  32. [40]

    2001, The Physics of Galaxy Formation, 222, 101

    Haiman, Z., & Cen, R. 2001, The Physics of Galaxy Formation, 222, 101. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ASPC..222..101H/abstract

    2001

  33. [41]

    2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 966, 80, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad307b

    Hamanowicz, A., Tchernyshyov, K., Roman-Duval, J., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 966, 80, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad307b

    2024 doi

  34. [42]

    J., Runnholm, A., Gronke, M., & Scarlata, C

    Hayes, M. J., Runnholm, A., Gronke, M., & Scarlata, C. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 908, 36, 10.3847/1538-4357/abd246

    2021 doi

  35. [43]

    E., Brammer, G

    Heintz, K. E., Brammer, G. B., Watson, D., et al. 2025, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 693, A60, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450243

    2025 doi

  36. [44]

    L., et al

    Hernandez, S., Aloisi, A., James, B. L., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 908, 226, 10.3847/1538-4357/abd6c4

    2021 doi

  37. [45]

    Hirano, S., Hosokawa, T., Yoshida, N., Omukai, K., & Yorke, H. W. 2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 448, 568, 10.1093/mnras/stv044

    2015 doi

  38. [46]

    L., Aloisi, A., Heckman, T., Sohn, S

    James, B. L., Aloisi, A., Heckman, T., Sohn, S. T., & Wolfe, M. A. 2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 795, 109, 10.1088/0004-637X/795/2/109

    2014 doi

  39. [47]

    L., & Aykutalp, A

    Johnson, J. L., & Aykutalp, A. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 879, 18, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab223e

    2019 doi

  40. [48]

    S., Devriendt, J., & Slyz, A

    Katz, H., Kimm, T., Ellis, R. S., Devriendt, J., & Slyz, A. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 524, 351, 10.1093/mnras/stad1903

    2023 doi

  41. [49]

    J., Saxena, A., et al

    Katz, H., Cameron, A. J., Saxena, A., et al. 2024, 21 Balmer Jump Street : The Nebular Continuum at High Redshift and Implications for the Bright Galaxy Problem , UV Continuum Slopes , and Early Stellar Populations , 10.48550/arXiv.2408.03189

    2024 doi arXiv

  42. [50]

    S., & Glover, S

    Klessen, R. S., & Glover, S. C. O. 2023, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 61, 65, 10.1146/annurev-astro-071221-053453

    2023 doi

  43. [51]

    Ledoux, C., Petitjean, P., Fynbo, J. P. U., Møller, P., & Srianand, R. 2006, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 457, 71, 10.1051/0004-6361:20054242

    2006 doi

  44. [52]

    2014, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 52, 415, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125615

    Madau, P., & Dickinson, M. 2014, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 52, 415, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125615

    2014 doi

  45. [53]

    Madau, P., & Rees, M. J. 2000, The Astrophysical Journal, 542, L69, 10.1086/312934

    2000 doi

  46. [54]

    2024, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 687, A67, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347087

    Maiolino, R., Übler, H., Perna, M., et al. 2024, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 687, A67, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347087

    2024 doi

  47. [55]

    2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 472, 772, 10.1093/mnras/stx2061

    Matthee, J., Sobral, D., Darvish, B., et al. 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 472, 772, 10.1093/mnras/stx2061

    2017 doi

  48. [56]

    1998, The Astrophysical Journal, 501, 15, 10.1086/305799

    Miralda-Escudé, J. 1998, The Astrophysical Journal, 501, 15, 10.1086/305799

    1998 doi

  49. [58]

    Black Hole Star

    Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., Katz, H., et al. 2025, A " Black Hole Star " Reveals the Remarkable Gas - Enshrouded Hearts of the Little Red Dots , arXiv, 10.48550/arXiv.2503.16596

    2025 doi arXiv

  50. [59]

    2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 513, 5134, 10.1093/mnras/stac1242

    Nakajima, K., & Maiolino, R. 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 513, 5134, 10.1093/mnras/stac1242

    2022 doi

  51. [60]

    2020, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 641, A6, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833910

    Planck Collaboration , Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., et al. 2020, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 641, A6, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833910

    2020 doi

  52. [61]

    X., Hennawi, J

    Prochaska, J. X., Hennawi, J. F., Westfall, K. B., et al. 2020, Journal of Open Source Software, 5, 2308, 10.21105/joss.02308

    2020 doi

  53. [62]

    X., Hennawi , J., Cooke , R., et al

    Prochaska , J. X., Hennawi , J., Cooke , R., et al. 2020, pypeit/PypeIt: Release 1.0.0 , v1.0.0, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.3743493

    2020 doi

  54. [63]

    V., Pettini, M., Madau, P., & Zych, B

    Ryan-Weber, E. V., Pettini, M., Madau, P., & Zych, B. J. 2009, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 395, 1476, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14618.x

    2009

  55. [64]

    2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 948, 35, 10.3847/1538-4357/acc39f

    Saccardi, A., Salvadori, S., D'Odorico, V., et al. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 948, 35, 10.3847/1538-4357/acc39f

    2023 doi

  56. [65]

    2012, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 421, L29, 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01200.x

    Salvadori, S., & Ferrara, A. 2012, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 421, L29, 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01200.x

    2012

  57. [66]

    2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 522, 4918, 10.1093/mnras/stad1326

    Satyavolu, S., Eilers, A.-C., Kulkarni, G., et al. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 522, 4918, 10.1093/mnras/stad1326

    2023 doi

  58. [67]

    S., Becker, G

    Sawyer, F., Bolton, J. S., Becker, G. D., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2502.03085, 10.48550/arXiv.2502.03085

    2025 doi arXiv

  59. [68]

    Schauer, A. T. P., Drory, N., & Bromm, V. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 904, 145, 10.3847/1538-4357/abbc0b

    2020 doi

  60. [69]

    Schauer, A. T. P., Glover, S. C. O., Klessen, R. S., & Ceverino, D. 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 484, 3510, 10.1093/mnras/stz013

    2019 doi

  61. [70]

    2003, The Astrophysical Journal, 596, 768, 10.1086/378044

    Schaye, J., Aguirre, A., Kim, T.-S., et al. 2003, The Astrophysical Journal, 596, 768, 10.1086/378044

    2003 doi

  62. [71]

    P., Bañados, E., et al

    Schindler, J.-T., Farina, E. P., Bañados, E., et al. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 905, 51, 10.3847/1538-4357/abc2d7

    2020 doi

  63. [72]

    A., Onoue, M., Eilers, A.-C., et al

    Simcoe, R. A., Onoue, M., Eilers, A.-C., et al. 2020, Interstellar and Circumgalactic Properties of an Unseen \ z=6.84\ Galaxy : Abundances , Ionization , and Heating in the Earliest Known Quasar Absorber , 10.48550/arXiv.2011.10582

    2020 doi arXiv

  64. [73]

    A., Sargent, W

    Simcoe, R. A., Sargent, W. L. W., & Rauch, M. 2002, The Astrophysical Journal, 578, 737, 10.1086/342620

    2002 doi

  65. [74]

    A., Sullivan, P

    Simcoe, R. A., Sullivan, P. W., Cooksey, K. L., et al. 2012, Nature, 492, 79, 10.1038/nature11612

    2012 doi

  66. [75]

    A., Burgasser, A

    Simcoe, R. A., Burgasser, A. J., Schechter, P. L., et al. 2013, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125, 270, 10.1086/670241

    2013 doi

  67. [76]

    2024, Astronomy &amp; Astrophysics, Volume 687, id.A314, NUMPAGES 44 /NUMPAGES pp., 687, A314, 10.1051/0004-6361/202349062

    Sodini, A., D'Odorico, V., Salvadori, S., et al. 2024, Astronomy &amp; Astrophysics, Volume 687, id.A314, NUMPAGES 44 /NUMPAGES pp., 687, A314, 10.1051/0004-6361/202349062

    2024 doi

  68. [77]

    Spina, B., Bosman, S. E. I., Davies, F. B., Gaikwad, P., & Zhu, Y. 2024, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 688, L26, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450798

    2024 doi

  69. [78]

    2007, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 382, 945, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12215.x

    Tornatore, L., Ferrara, A., & Schneider, R. 2007, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 382, 945, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12215.x

    2007

  70. [79]

    D., & Cupani, G

    Vanni, I., Salvadori, S., D'Odorico, V., Becker, G. D., & Cupani, G. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 967, L22, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad46fa

    2024 doi

  71. [80]

    2023, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 678, A173, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346981

    Vanzella, E., Loiacono, F., Bergamini, P., et al. 2023, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 678, A173, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346981

    2023 doi

  72. [81]

    2011, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 536, A105, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117752

    Vernet, J., Dekker, H., D’Odorico, S., et al. 2011, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 536, A105, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117752

    2011 doi

  73. [82]

    Viegas, S. M. 1995, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 276, 268, 10.1093/mnras/276.1.268

    1995 doi

  74. [83]

    2018, The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 868, Issue 2, article id

    Vladilo, G., Gioannini, L., Matteucci, F., & Palla, M. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 868, Issue 2, article id. 127, NUMPAGES 13 /NUMPAGES pp. (2018)., 868, 127, 10.3847/1538-4357/aae8dc

    2018 doi

  75. [84]

    B., Yang, J., et al

    Wang, F., Davies, F. B., Yang, J., et al. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 896, 23, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8c45

    2020 doi

  76. [85]

    M., Streicher, O., Urrutia, T., et al

    Weilbacher, P. M., Streicher, O., Urrutia, T., et al. 2012, 8451, 84510B, 10.1117/12.925114

    2012 doi

  77. [86]

    2014, 485, 451, 10.48550/arXiv.1507.00034

    ---. 2014, 485, 451, 10.48550/arXiv.1507.00034

    2014 doi arXiv

  78. [87]

    2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 525, 527, 10.1093/mnras/stad2181

    Welsh, L., Cooke, R., Fumagalli, M., & Pettini, M. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 525, 527, 10.1093/mnras/stad2181

    2023 doi

  79. [88]

    Welsh, L., Cooke, R., Fumagalli, M., Pettini, M., & Rudie, G. C. 2024, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 691, A285, 10.1051/0004-6361/202451147

    2024 doi

  80. [89]

    J., Asada, Y., Iyer, K

    Willott, C. J., Asada, Y., Iyer, K. G., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2502.07733, 10.48550/arXiv.2502.07733

    2025 doi arXiv

  81. [90]

    2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 904, 26, 10.3847/1538-4357/abbc1b

    Yang, J., Wang, F., Fan, X., et al. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 904, 26, 10.3847/1538-4357/abbc1b

    2020 doi

  82. [91]

    A., et al

    Yue, M., Eilers, A.-C., Simcoe, R. A., et al. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 950, 105, 10.3847/1538-4357/accf20

    2023 doi

  83. [92]

    D., Bosman, S

    Zhu, Y., Becker, G. D., Bosman, S. E. I., et al. 2024, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 533, L49, 10.1093/mnrasl/slae061

    2024 doi

  84. [93]

    Ďurovčíková, D., Katz, H., Bosman, S. E. I., et al. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 493, 4256, 10.1093/mnras/staa505

    2020 doi

  85. [94]

    2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 969, 162, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4888

    Ďurovčíková, D., Eilers, A.-C., Chen, H., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 969, 162, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4888

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.