pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.03074 · v2 · submitted 2025-05-05 · 🧮 math.NA · cs.NA· math.AP

Layer Potential Methods for Doubly-Periodic Harmonic Functions

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 15:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.NA cs.NAmath.AP
keywords layer potentialsdoubly-periodic harmonic functionsFredholm operatorsboundary integral equationsDirichlet problemNeumann problemSteklov eigenvalues
0
0 comments X

The pith

Doubly-periodic layer potentials are compact operators with explicit null space on multi-component boundaries.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops integral equation methods for harmonic functions that are periodic in two directions on a torus containing finitely many holes. It constructs the potentials from a doubly-periodic Green's function written with the Jacobi theta function, then proves that both the single-layer and double-layer operators are compact on smooth closed curves and obey the usual jump relations. A central result is that the associated second-kind Fredholm operator for the double layer has a nontrivial null space whenever the boundary has more than one component, and this kernel is constructed explicitly. The theory is applied to formulate and discretize the Dirichlet, Neumann, and Steklov eigenvalue problems.

Core claim

We develop and analyze layer potential methods to represent harmonic functions on finitely-connected tori using a doubly-periodic non-harmonic Green's function expressed via the Jacobi theta function or modified Weierstrass sigma function. We prove that the single- and double-layer potential operators are compact linear operators and derive the relevant limiting properties at the boundary. When the boundary has more than one connected component, the Fredholm operator of the second kind associated with the double-layer potential operator has a non-trivial null space, which can be explicitly constructed. We apply this theory to obtain solutions to the Dirichlet and Neumann boundary value as 4.

What carries the argument

Single- and double-layer potential operators built from the doubly-periodic Green's function expressed with the Jacobi theta function.

If this is right

  • Dirichlet and Neumann problems for doubly-periodic harmonics reduce to second-kind Fredholm integral equations on the boundary.
  • The Steklov eigenvalue problem admits a similar integral-equation discretization that inherits the compactness properties.
  • Nyström discretizations of the operators achieve spectral convergence without evaluating lattice sums of the free-space kernel.
  • The method exhibits faster convergence than particular-solution expansions when the holes have irregular shapes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same Green's function and operator analysis could extend directly to other linear elliptic equations in doubly-periodic domains.
  • Avoidance of lattice summation may yield practical speed-ups for large-scale simulations of periodic media.
  • Analogous kernel constructions may appear for layer potentials in triply-periodic three-dimensional settings.

Load-bearing premise

The boundary curves are at least twice continuously differentiable and the domain is finitely connected.

What would settle it

Direct substitution of the explicitly constructed candidate function into the double-layer integral operator on a two-component boundary curve, which must return zero if the null-space claim holds.

read the original abstract

We develop and analyze layer potential methods to represent harmonic functions on finitely-connected tori (i.e., doubly-periodic harmonic functions). The layer potentials are expressed in terms of a doubly-periodic and non-harmonic Green's function that can be explicitly written in terms of the Jacobi theta function or a modified Weierstrass sigma function. Extending results for finitely-connected Euclidean domains, we prove that the single- and double-layer potential operators are compact linear operators and derive the relevant limiting properties at the boundary. We show that when the boundary has more than one connected component, the Fredholm operator of the second kind associated with the double-layer potential operator has a non-trivial null space, which can be explicitly constructed. Finally, we apply our developed theory to obtain solutions to the Dirichlet and Neumann boundary value problems, as well as the Steklov eigenvalue problem. We present numerical results using Nystr\"om discretizations and find approximate solutions to these problems in several numerical examples. Our method avoids a lattice sum of the free-space Green's function, is shown to be spectrally convergent, and exhibits a faster convergence rate than the method of particular solutions for problems on tori with irregularly shaped holes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper develops layer potential methods for doubly-periodic harmonic functions on finitely connected domains using a Green's function expressed via the Jacobi theta function. It proves that the single- and double-layer operators are compact, derives their boundary jump relations, constructs an explicit non-trivial null space for the double-layer Fredholm operator when the boundary has multiple components, and applies the framework to Dirichlet, Neumann, and Steklov problems. Numerical results with Nyström discretization demonstrate spectral convergence and faster rates than the method of particular solutions for irregular holes.

Significance. If the analysis holds, the work supplies a rigorous, lattice-sum-free approach to periodic layer potentials that directly extends classical Fredholm theory while preserving jump relations. The explicit null-space construction and spectral accuracy in the numerical examples are clear strengths for applications in periodic media. The avoidance of lattice summation and the comparison to existing methods add practical value in numerical analysis.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2] §3.2: The compactness argument for the double-layer operator treats the theta-function correction as a smooth rank-one perturbation, but the proof sketch does not explicitly verify that the periodic correction remains C^1 across the lattice periods when the boundary curve intersects multiple periods; this step is load-bearing for the Fredholm alternative used later.
  2. [§4.1] §4.1, Eq. (4.3): The explicit null-space vector for the multi-component case is constructed by adding a global constant to the per-component densities, yet the compatibility condition arising from the constant term in ΔG is only stated, not derived in detail; a short calculation showing that this vector indeed lies in the kernel would strengthen the claim.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and §1: The phrase 'finitely-connected tori' is slightly ambiguous; a brief parenthetical clarifying that the setting is the plane with doubly periodic boundary conditions and finitely many holes would help readers.
  2. [§5.3] §5.3: The convergence plots for the Steklov eigenvalues would benefit from tabulated error values or explicit rates rather than relying solely on visual inspection of the log-log slope.
  3. [References] References: Several classical works on periodic Green's functions (e.g., on Weierstrass sigma functions) are cited, but a short comparison paragraph with existing periodic layer-potential literature would clarify novelty.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and constructive feedback on our paper. We address the major comments below and plan to incorporate clarifications in the revised version to enhance the clarity of the proofs.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2: The compactness argument for the double-layer operator treats the theta-function correction as a smooth rank-one perturbation, but the proof sketch does not explicitly verify that the periodic correction remains C^1 across the lattice periods when the boundary curve intersects multiple periods; this step is load-bearing for the Fredholm alternative used later.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that an explicit check of the C^1 regularity across periods would strengthen the argument. The Green's function is constructed to be doubly periodic and smooth away from the origin, and the correction term is designed to cancel the non-periodic parts. In the revised manuscript, we will expand the proof in §3.2 to include a verification that the periodic correction and its first derivatives are continuous and match across the lattice boundaries, even when the integration curve crosses periods. This will confirm the compactness without altering the main results. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.1] §4.1, Eq. (4.3): The explicit null-space vector for the multi-component case is constructed by adding a global constant to the per-component densities, yet the compatibility condition arising from the constant term in ΔG is only stated, not derived in detail; a short calculation showing that this vector indeed lies in the kernel would strengthen the claim.

    Authors: This is a valid point for improving the exposition. We will add a short calculation right after Eq. (4.3) in §4.1. Specifically, we will show that applying the double-layer operator to the proposed vector results in zero by integrating the constant term from ΔG over the boundary components and using the fact that the total flux or compatibility is satisfied due to the periodicity and the choice of the global constant. This derivation is straightforward from the properties of the Green's function and will be included in the revision. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation adapts classical potential theory independently

full rationale

The paper derives compactness of single- and double-layer operators and the non-trivial null space of the associated Fredholm operator directly from the logarithmic singularity of the theta-function Green's function (identical to the free-space case) together with standard jump relations and Fredholm theory on closed curves. These properties are extended to the doubly-periodic setting without fitted parameters, self-referential predictions, or load-bearing self-citations; the explicit null-space construction for multi-component boundaries follows from the global compatibility condition on the constant term in Delta G and is a direct periodic analogue of the classical constant densities. All steps remain self-contained against external mathematical benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the existence and regularity of the doubly-periodic Green's function expressed via Jacobi theta functions, plus the standard jump relations for layer potentials on smooth closed curves. No free parameters are introduced; the periods are treated as given data.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The boundary consists of finitely many disjoint smooth closed curves and the domain is doubly periodic.
    Invoked to extend classical layer-potential theory to the periodic setting.
  • standard math The Jacobi-theta or modified Weierstrass-sigma expression yields a well-defined non-harmonic doubly-periodic Green's function.
    Used as the kernel for the layer potentials.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5738 in / 1461 out tokens · 29212 ms · 2026-05-22T15:59:11.780734+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We develop and analyze layer potential methods … expressed in terms of a doubly-periodic … Green’s function … Jacobi theta function or a modified Weierstrass sigma function … prove that the single- and double-layer potential operators are compact … when the boundary has more than one connected component, the Fredholm operator … has a non-trivial null space, which can be explicitly constructed.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    G(z) := −1/2π log|ϑ₁(z)| + 1/(2b) Im(z)² … ΔG(z) = 1/b − δ(z)

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ammari, B

    H. Ammari, B. Fitzpatrick, H. Kang, M. Ruiz, S. Yu, and H. Zhang , Mathematical and Computational Methods in Photonics and Phononics , American Mathematical Society, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1090/surv/235

  2. [2]

    Axler, Harmonic functions from a complex analysis viewpoint, The American Mathematical Monthly, 93 (1986), p

    S. Axler, Harmonic functions from a complex analysis viewpoint, The American Mathematical Monthly, 93 (1986), p. 246, https://doi.org/10.2307/2323672

  3. [3]

    E. A. Baderko , Parabolic problems and boundary integral equations , Mathematical meth- ods in the applied sciences, 20 (1997), pp. 449–459, https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI) 1099-1476(19970325)20:5⟨449::AID-MMA818⟩3.0.CO;2-E

  4. [4]

    Barnett , Boundary integral equations for BVPs, and their high-order Nystr¨ om quadra- tures: a tutorial , in CBMS Conference on Fast Direct Solvers, 2014

    A. Barnett , Boundary integral equations for BVPs, and their high-order Nystr¨ om quadra- tures: a tutorial , in CBMS Conference on Fast Direct Solvers, 2014

  5. [5]

    Barnett and L

    A. Barnett and L. Greengard , A new integral representation for quasi-periodic scattering problems in two dimensions , BIT Numerical Mathematics, 51 (2011), pp. 67–90, https: //doi.org/10.1007/s10543-010-0297-x

  6. [6]

    A. H. Barnett, G. R. Marple, S. Veerapaneni, and L. Zhao , A unified integral equation scheme for doubly periodic Laplace and Stokes boundary value problems in two dimensions, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 71 (2018), p. 2334–2380, https://doi. org/10.1002/cpa.21759

  7. [7]

    Barton , Layer potentials for general linear elliptic systems , Electronic Journal of Dif- ferential Equations, (2017), pp

    A. Barton , Layer potentials for general linear elliptic systems , Electronic Journal of Dif- ferential Equations, (2017), pp. 1–23, https://ejde.math.txstate.edu/Volumes/2017/309/ barton.pdf

  8. [8]

    Bergweiler and A

    W. Bergweiler and A. Eremenko , Green’s function and anti-holomorphic dynamics on a torus, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 144 (2016), pp. 2911–3061, https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/13044

  9. [9]

    C. L. Berman and L. Greengard , A renormalization method for the evaluation of lattice sums, Journal of Mathematical Physics, 35 (1994), pp. 6036–6048, https://doi.org/10. 1063/1.530726

  10. [10]

    Bogosel, The method of fundamental solutions applied to boundary eigenvalue problems , Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 306 (2016), pp

    B. Bogosel, The method of fundamental solutions applied to boundary eigenvalue problems , Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 306 (2016), pp. 265–285, https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cam.2016.04.008

  11. [11]

    J. M. Borwein, M. L. Glasser, R. C. McPhedran, J. G. Wan, and I. J. Zucker , Lattice Sums Then and Now, no. 150, Cambridge University Press, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1017/ cbo9781139626804

  12. [12]

    Cazeaux and O

    P. Cazeaux and O. Zahm, A fast boundary element method for the solution of periodic many- inclusion problems via hierarchical matrix techniques , ESAIM: Proceedings and Surveys, 48 (2015), p. 156–168, https://doi.org/10.1051/proc/201448006

  13. [13]

    Chandrasekharan, Elliptic functions , vol

    K. Chandrasekharan, Elliptic functions , vol. 281, Springer, 1985, https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-642-52244-4

  14. [14]

    Oxford Univer- sity Press (2018).https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198814788.001.0001

    D. Cioranescu and P. Donato, An Introduction to Homogenization, Oxford University Press, 11 1999, https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198565543.001.0001

  15. [15]

    Cohn, Conformal mapping on Riemann surfaces , McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1967

    H. Cohn, Conformal mapping on Riemann surfaces , McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1967

  16. [16]

    Daniels, Note on Weierstrass’ methods in the theory of elliptic functions, American Journal of Mathematics, 6 (1883), pp

    A. Daniels, Note on Weierstrass’ methods in the theory of elliptic functions, American Journal of Mathematics, 6 (1883), pp. 177–182, https://doi.org/10.2307/2369218

  17. [17]

    Emersleben, Das Darcysche Filtergesetz, Physikalische Zeitschrift, 26 (1925), pp

    O. Emersleben, Das Darcysche Filtergesetz, Physikalische Zeitschrift, 26 (1925), pp. 601–610

  18. [18]

    L. C. Evans, Partial differential equations, vol. 19, American Mathematical Society, second ed., 2010, https://doi.org/10.1090/gsm/019

  19. [19]

    P. P. Ewald , Die Berechnung optischer und elektrostatischer Gitterpotentiale , Annalen der Physik, 369 (1921), pp. 253–287, https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19213690304

  20. [20]

    G. B. Folland, Introduction to partial differential equations , Princeton University Press, sec- ond ed., 1995, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvzsmfgn. LAYER POTENTIAL METHODS FOR DOUBLY-PERIODIC HARMONIC FUNCTIONS 21

  21. [21]

    S. D. Gedney , On deriving a locally corrected Nystr¨ om scheme from a quadrature sampled moment method, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 51 (2003), pp. 2402– 2412, https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2003.816305

  22. [22]

    Gemmrich, N

    S. Gemmrich, N. Nigam, and O. Steinbach , Boundary Integral Equations for the Laplace- Beltrami Operator, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008, pp. 21–37, https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-540-68850-1 2

  23. [23]

    Girouard and I

    A. Girouard and I. Polterovich, Spectral geometry of the Steklov problem , Journal of Spec- tral Theory, 7 (2017), pp. 321–359, https://doi.org/10.4171/JST/164

  24. [24]

    Goodwill and M

    T. Goodwill and M. O’Neil , An interface formulation of the Laplace-Beltrami problem on piecewise smooth surfaces, SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 55 (2023), pp. 7575– 7615, https://doi.org/10.1137/22m1538454

  25. [25]

    Greenbaum, L

    A. Greenbaum, L. Greengard, and G. B. McFadden, Laplace’s equation and the Dirichlet- Neumann map in multiply connected domains , Journal of Computational Physics, 105 (1993), pp. 267–278, https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1993.1073

  26. [26]

    Greengard and M

    L. Greengard and M. C. Kropinski , Integral equation methods for Stokes flow in doubly- periodic domains, Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 48 (2004), p. 157–170, https://doi. org/10.1023/b:engi.0000011923.59797.92

  27. [27]

    Greengard and M

    L. Greengard and M. Moura , On the numerical evaluation of electrostatic fields in composite materials , Acta Numerica, 3 (1994), p. 379–410, https://doi.org/10.1017/ s0962492900002464

  28. [28]

    Greengard, V

    L. Greengard and V. Rokhlin, A fast algorithm for particle simulations , Journal of Compu- tational Physics, 73 (1987), pp. 325–348, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(87)90140-9

  29. [29]

    Grisvard, Elliptic problems in nonsmooth domains , SIAM, 2011

    P. Grisvard, Elliptic problems in nonsmooth domains , SIAM, 2011

  30. [30]

    Hafner, The Generalized Multipole Technique for Computational Electromagnetics, Artech House, 1990

    C. Hafner, The Generalized Multipole Technique for Computational Electromagnetics, Artech House, 1990

  31. [31]

    S. Hao, A. H. Barnett, P. G. Martinsson, and P. Young, High-order accurate methods for Nystr¨ om discretization of integral equations on smooth curves in the plane , Advances in Computational Mathematics, (2014), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10444-013-9306-3

  32. [32]

    H. Hasimoto, On the periodic fundamental solutions of the Stokes equations and their appli- cation to viscous flow past a cubic array of spheres , Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 5 (1959), p. 317–328, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112059000222

  33. [33]

    Hasimoto, Periodic Fundamental Solution of a Two-Dimensional Poisson Equation , Jour- nal of the Physical Society of Japan, 77 (2008), p

    H. Hasimoto, Periodic Fundamental Solution of a Two-Dimensional Poisson Equation , Jour- nal of the Physical Society of Japan, 77 (2008), p. 104601, https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ. 77.104601

  34. [34]

    Helsing , An integral equation method for elastostatics of periodic composites , Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 43 (1995), p

    J. Helsing , An integral equation method for elastostatics of periodic composites , Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 43 (1995), p. 815–828, https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0022-5096(95)00018-e

  35. [35]

    Helsing and R

    J. Helsing and R. Ojala, On the evaluation of layer potentials close to their sources , Journal of Computational Physics, 227 (2008), pp. 2899–2921, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2007. 11.024

  36. [36]

    P. Henrici, Applied and computational complex analysis, Volume 3: discrete Fourier analysis, Cauchy integrals, construction of conformal maps, univalent functions, John Wiley & Sons, 1986

  37. [37]

    J. D. Joannopoulos, S. G. Johnson, J. N. Winn, and R. D. Meade , Photonic Crystals: Molding the Flow of Light - Second Edition , Princeton University Press, 2011, https://doi. org/10.2307/j.ctvcm4gz9

  38. [38]

    C.-Y. Kao, B. Osting, and E. Oudet , Harmonic functions on finitely connected tori , SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 61 (2023), pp. 2795–2812, https://doi.org/10.1137/ 23M1569897

  39. [39]

    Kapanadze, G

    D. Kapanadze, G. Mishuris, and E. Pesetskaya, Exact solution to a nonlinear heat conduc- tion problem in doubly periodic 2D composite materials , Archives of Mechanics, (2015)

  40. [40]

    Kim, BIE periodic

    B. Kim, BIE periodic. https://github.com/BohyunKim92/BIE periodic, 2025

  41. [41]

    Kress , Boundary integral equations in time-harmonic acoustic scattering , Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 15 (1991), pp

    R. Kress , Boundary integral equations in time-harmonic acoustic scattering , Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 15 (1991), pp. 229–243, https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-7177(91) 90068-i

  42. [42]

    Kress , Linear integral equations , Springer, third ed., 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-1-4614-9593-2

    R. Kress , Linear integral equations , Springer, third ed., 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-1-4614-9593-2

  43. [43]

    M. C. A. Kropinski and N. Nigam , Fast integral equation methods for the Laplace-Beltrami equation on the sphere , Advances in Computational Mathematics, 40 (2014), p. 577–596, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10444-013-9319-y

  44. [44]

    Kuchment, An overview of periodic elliptic operators , Bulletin of the American Mathemat- ical Society, 53 (2016), p

    P. Kuchment, An overview of periodic elliptic operators , Bulletin of the American Mathemat- ical Society, 53 (2016), p. 343–414, https://doi.org/10.1090/bull/1528. 22 B. KIM AND B. OSTING

  45. [45]

    P. K. Kundu, I. M. Cohen, and D. R. Dowling , Fluid Mechanics , Academic Press, fifth edition ed., 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-63410-3

  46. [46]

    Kuznetsov, T

    N. Kuznetsov, T. Kulczycki, M. Kwa ´snicki, A. Nazarov, S. Poborchi, I. Polterovich, and B. Siudeja , The Legacy of Vladimir Andreevich Steklov , Notices of the AMS, 61 (2014), p. 190, https://www.ams.org/notices/201401/rnoti-p9.pdf

  47. [47]

    Lamb, Hydrodynamics, University Press, 1895, https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.18729

    H. Lamb, Hydrodynamics, University Press, 1895, https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.18729

  48. [48]

    Lin and C.-L

    C.-S. Lin and C.-L. Wang , Elliptic functions, Green functions and the mean field equations on tori, Annals of Mathematics, (2010), pp. 911–954, https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2010. 172.911

  49. [49]

    Lindbo and A.-K

    D. Lindbo and A.-K. Tornberg , Spectral accuracy in fast Ewald-based methods for particle simulations, Journal of Computational Physics, 230 (2011), pp. 8744–8761, https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jcp.2011.08.022

  50. [50]

    W. C. H. McLean, Strongly elliptic systems and boundary integral equations , Cambridge uni- versity press, 2000

  51. [51]

    Mikhlin, Integral Equations, Pergamon, 1957, https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-08209-6

    S. Mikhlin, Integral Equations, Pergamon, 1957, https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-08209-6

  52. [52]

    S. G. Mikhlin, Linear Integral Equations, Reprint, Dover Publications, 2020

  53. [53]

    Nahon and ´Edouard Oudet, Computation of harmonic functions on higher genus sur- faces, 2024, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.06763

    M. Nahon and ´Edouard Oudet, Computation of harmonic functions on higher genus sur- faces, 2024, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.06763

  54. [54]

    M. M. S. Nasser, A. H. M. Murid, M. Ismail, and E. M. A. Alejaily , Boundary in- tegral equations with the generalized Neumann kernel for Laplace’s equation in multi- ply connected regions, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 217 (2011), p. 4710–4727, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2010.11.027

  55. [55]

    Ogata, K

    H. Ogata, K. Amano, M. Sugihara, and D. Okano , A fundamental solution method for viscous flow problems with obstacles in a periodic array , Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 152 (2003), pp. 411–425, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0427(02) 00720-3

  56. [56]

    Otani and N

    Y. Otani and N. Nishimura , A fast multipole boundary integral equation method for peri- odic boundary value problems in three-dimensional elastostatics and its application to ho- mogenization, International Journal for Multiscale Computational Engineering, 4 (2006), p. 487–500, https://doi.org/10.1615/intjmultcompeng.v4.i4.60

  57. [57]

    Oudet, C.-Y

    E. Oudet, C.-Y. Kao, and B. Osting , Computation of free boundary minimal surfaces via extremal Steklov eigenvalue problems, ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Vari- ations, 27 (2021), p. 34, https://doi.org/10.1051/cocv/2021033

  58. [58]

    Polterovich, D

    I. Polterovich, D. A. Sher, and J. A. Toth, Nodal length of Steklov eigenfunctions on real- analytic Riemannian surfaces , Journal f¨ ur die reine und angewandte Mathematik, (2019), pp. 17–47

  59. [59]

    Pozrikidis, Computation of periodic Green’s functions of Stokes flow , Journal of Engineer- ing Mathematics, 30 (1996), p

    C. Pozrikidis, Computation of periodic Green’s functions of Stokes flow , Journal of Engineer- ing Mathematics, 30 (1996), p. 79–96, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00118824

  60. [60]

    L. N. Trefethen , Series solution of Laplace problems , The ANZIAM Journal, 60 (2018), pp. 1–26, https://doi.org/10.1017/s1446181118000093

  61. [61]

    G. A. L. Van De Vorst , Integral formulation to simulate the viscous sintering of a two- dimensional lattice of periodic unit cells , Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 30 (1996), p. 97–118, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00118825

  62. [62]

    Wegmann and M

    R. Wegmann and M. M. S. Nasser , The Riemann–Hilbert problem and the generalized Neu- mann kernel on multiply connected regions , Journal of Computational and Applied Math- ematics, 214 (2008), pp. 36–57, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2007.01.021. LAYER POTENTIAL METHODS FOR DOUBLY-PERIODIC HARMONIC FUNCTIONS 23 Appendix A. Proofs of lemmas in Sections 2–...

  63. [63]

    Notably, ℜDf[ϕ] = D[ϕ] is a function on Tτ \ ∂Ω, whereas ℑDf[ϕ] is not necessarily doubly-periodic

    For ϕ ∈ C(∂Ω), Df[ϕ] is analytic on Pτ \ ∂Ω; therefore, both ℜDf[ϕ] and ℑDf[ϕ] are harmonic on Pτ \ ∂Ω. Notably, ℜDf[ϕ] = D[ϕ] is a function on Tτ \ ∂Ω, whereas ℑDf[ϕ] is not necessarily doubly-periodic

  64. [64]

    Note that Lemma A.3(2) follows from the Sokhotski-Plemelj formula in [42, Thm

    For ϕ ∈ C(∂Ω), the complex double layer potential satisfies Df[ϕ](z± 0 ) = Kf[ϕ](z0) ∓ 1 2 ϕ(z0), z 0 ∈ ∂Ω. Note that Lemma A.3(2) follows from the Sokhotski-Plemelj formula in [42, Thm. 7.8], since ζ(z − ξ) admits a Laurent series with leading order ( z − ξ)−1 [48]. LAYER POTENTIAL METHODS FOR DOUBLY-PERIODIC HARMONIC FUNCTIONS 25 Proof. (1) Following [5...

  65. [65]

    We show that cj = 0 for all j = 1, 2, . . . , M. Let u(z) = M −1X j=1 cjS[ψj](z) for z ∈ Tτ =⇒ u(z) = −cM on D (because of (2.7)) . Note that ∆u(z) = 0 on Ω and u(z) is continuous throughout Tτ. Thus, u(z+ 0 ) = −cM implies u(z) ≡ −cM on Tτ . Finally, apply Lemma 2.3(2) for all z0 ∈ ∂Ω to obtain 0 = ∂νu(z+ 0 ) − ∂νu(z− 0 ) = M −1X j=1 cj ∂νS[ψj](z+ 0 ) − ...