Layer Potential Methods for Doubly-Periodic Harmonic Functions
Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 15:59 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Doubly-periodic layer potentials are compact operators with explicit null space on multi-component boundaries.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
We develop and analyze layer potential methods to represent harmonic functions on finitely-connected tori using a doubly-periodic non-harmonic Green's function expressed via the Jacobi theta function or modified Weierstrass sigma function. We prove that the single- and double-layer potential operators are compact linear operators and derive the relevant limiting properties at the boundary. When the boundary has more than one connected component, the Fredholm operator of the second kind associated with the double-layer potential operator has a non-trivial null space, which can be explicitly constructed. We apply this theory to obtain solutions to the Dirichlet and Neumann boundary value as 4.
What carries the argument
Single- and double-layer potential operators built from the doubly-periodic Green's function expressed with the Jacobi theta function.
If this is right
- Dirichlet and Neumann problems for doubly-periodic harmonics reduce to second-kind Fredholm integral equations on the boundary.
- The Steklov eigenvalue problem admits a similar integral-equation discretization that inherits the compactness properties.
- Nyström discretizations of the operators achieve spectral convergence without evaluating lattice sums of the free-space kernel.
- The method exhibits faster convergence than particular-solution expansions when the holes have irregular shapes.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The same Green's function and operator analysis could extend directly to other linear elliptic equations in doubly-periodic domains.
- Avoidance of lattice summation may yield practical speed-ups for large-scale simulations of periodic media.
- Analogous kernel constructions may appear for layer potentials in triply-periodic three-dimensional settings.
Load-bearing premise
The boundary curves are at least twice continuously differentiable and the domain is finitely connected.
What would settle it
Direct substitution of the explicitly constructed candidate function into the double-layer integral operator on a two-component boundary curve, which must return zero if the null-space claim holds.
read the original abstract
We develop and analyze layer potential methods to represent harmonic functions on finitely-connected tori (i.e., doubly-periodic harmonic functions). The layer potentials are expressed in terms of a doubly-periodic and non-harmonic Green's function that can be explicitly written in terms of the Jacobi theta function or a modified Weierstrass sigma function. Extending results for finitely-connected Euclidean domains, we prove that the single- and double-layer potential operators are compact linear operators and derive the relevant limiting properties at the boundary. We show that when the boundary has more than one connected component, the Fredholm operator of the second kind associated with the double-layer potential operator has a non-trivial null space, which can be explicitly constructed. Finally, we apply our developed theory to obtain solutions to the Dirichlet and Neumann boundary value problems, as well as the Steklov eigenvalue problem. We present numerical results using Nystr\"om discretizations and find approximate solutions to these problems in several numerical examples. Our method avoids a lattice sum of the free-space Green's function, is shown to be spectrally convergent, and exhibits a faster convergence rate than the method of particular solutions for problems on tori with irregularly shaped holes.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper develops layer potential methods for doubly-periodic harmonic functions on finitely connected domains using a Green's function expressed via the Jacobi theta function. It proves that the single- and double-layer operators are compact, derives their boundary jump relations, constructs an explicit non-trivial null space for the double-layer Fredholm operator when the boundary has multiple components, and applies the framework to Dirichlet, Neumann, and Steklov problems. Numerical results with Nyström discretization demonstrate spectral convergence and faster rates than the method of particular solutions for irregular holes.
Significance. If the analysis holds, the work supplies a rigorous, lattice-sum-free approach to periodic layer potentials that directly extends classical Fredholm theory while preserving jump relations. The explicit null-space construction and spectral accuracy in the numerical examples are clear strengths for applications in periodic media. The avoidance of lattice summation and the comparison to existing methods add practical value in numerical analysis.
major comments (2)
- [§3.2] §3.2: The compactness argument for the double-layer operator treats the theta-function correction as a smooth rank-one perturbation, but the proof sketch does not explicitly verify that the periodic correction remains C^1 across the lattice periods when the boundary curve intersects multiple periods; this step is load-bearing for the Fredholm alternative used later.
- [§4.1] §4.1, Eq. (4.3): The explicit null-space vector for the multi-component case is constructed by adding a global constant to the per-component densities, yet the compatibility condition arising from the constant term in ΔG is only stated, not derived in detail; a short calculation showing that this vector indeed lies in the kernel would strengthen the claim.
minor comments (3)
- [Abstract] Abstract and §1: The phrase 'finitely-connected tori' is slightly ambiguous; a brief parenthetical clarifying that the setting is the plane with doubly periodic boundary conditions and finitely many holes would help readers.
- [§5.3] §5.3: The convergence plots for the Steklov eigenvalues would benefit from tabulated error values or explicit rates rather than relying solely on visual inspection of the log-log slope.
- [References] References: Several classical works on periodic Green's functions (e.g., on Weierstrass sigma functions) are cited, but a short comparison paragraph with existing periodic layer-potential literature would clarify novelty.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the thorough review and constructive feedback on our paper. We address the major comments below and plan to incorporate clarifications in the revised version to enhance the clarity of the proofs.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [§3.2] §3.2: The compactness argument for the double-layer operator treats the theta-function correction as a smooth rank-one perturbation, but the proof sketch does not explicitly verify that the periodic correction remains C^1 across the lattice periods when the boundary curve intersects multiple periods; this step is load-bearing for the Fredholm alternative used later.
Authors: We agree with the referee that an explicit check of the C^1 regularity across periods would strengthen the argument. The Green's function is constructed to be doubly periodic and smooth away from the origin, and the correction term is designed to cancel the non-periodic parts. In the revised manuscript, we will expand the proof in §3.2 to include a verification that the periodic correction and its first derivatives are continuous and match across the lattice boundaries, even when the integration curve crosses periods. This will confirm the compactness without altering the main results. revision: yes
-
Referee: [§4.1] §4.1, Eq. (4.3): The explicit null-space vector for the multi-component case is constructed by adding a global constant to the per-component densities, yet the compatibility condition arising from the constant term in ΔG is only stated, not derived in detail; a short calculation showing that this vector indeed lies in the kernel would strengthen the claim.
Authors: This is a valid point for improving the exposition. We will add a short calculation right after Eq. (4.3) in §4.1. Specifically, we will show that applying the double-layer operator to the proposed vector results in zero by integrating the constant term from ΔG over the boundary components and using the fact that the total flux or compatibility is satisfied due to the periodicity and the choice of the global constant. This derivation is straightforward from the properties of the Green's function and will be included in the revision. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No significant circularity; derivation adapts classical potential theory independently
full rationale
The paper derives compactness of single- and double-layer operators and the non-trivial null space of the associated Fredholm operator directly from the logarithmic singularity of the theta-function Green's function (identical to the free-space case) together with standard jump relations and Fredholm theory on closed curves. These properties are extended to the doubly-periodic setting without fitted parameters, self-referential predictions, or load-bearing self-citations; the explicit null-space construction for multi-component boundaries follows from the global compatibility condition on the constant term in Delta G and is a direct periodic analogue of the classical constant densities. All steps remain self-contained against external mathematical benchmarks.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (2)
- domain assumption The boundary consists of finitely many disjoint smooth closed curves and the domain is doubly periodic.
- standard math The Jacobi-theta or modified Weierstrass-sigma expression yields a well-defined non-harmonic doubly-periodic Green's function.
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.leanalexander_duality_circle_linking unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
We develop and analyze layer potential methods … expressed in terms of a doubly-periodic … Green’s function … Jacobi theta function or a modified Weierstrass sigma function … prove that the single- and double-layer potential operators are compact … when the boundary has more than one connected component, the Fredholm operator … has a non-trivial null space, which can be explicitly constructed.
-
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.leanwashburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
G(z) := −1/2π log|ϑ₁(z)| + 1/(2b) Im(z)² … ΔG(z) = 1/b − δ(z)
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
H. Ammari, B. Fitzpatrick, H. Kang, M. Ruiz, S. Yu, and H. Zhang , Mathematical and Computational Methods in Photonics and Phononics , American Mathematical Society, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1090/surv/235
-
[2]
S. Axler, Harmonic functions from a complex analysis viewpoint, The American Mathematical Monthly, 93 (1986), p. 246, https://doi.org/10.2307/2323672
-
[3]
E. A. Baderko , Parabolic problems and boundary integral equations , Mathematical meth- ods in the applied sciences, 20 (1997), pp. 449–459, https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI) 1099-1476(19970325)20:5⟨449::AID-MMA818⟩3.0.CO;2-E
-
[4]
A. Barnett , Boundary integral equations for BVPs, and their high-order Nystr¨ om quadra- tures: a tutorial , in CBMS Conference on Fast Direct Solvers, 2014
work page 2014
-
[5]
A. Barnett and L. Greengard , A new integral representation for quasi-periodic scattering problems in two dimensions , BIT Numerical Mathematics, 51 (2011), pp. 67–90, https: //doi.org/10.1007/s10543-010-0297-x
-
[6]
A. H. Barnett, G. R. Marple, S. Veerapaneni, and L. Zhao , A unified integral equation scheme for doubly periodic Laplace and Stokes boundary value problems in two dimensions, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 71 (2018), p. 2334–2380, https://doi. org/10.1002/cpa.21759
-
[7]
A. Barton , Layer potentials for general linear elliptic systems , Electronic Journal of Dif- ferential Equations, (2017), pp. 1–23, https://ejde.math.txstate.edu/Volumes/2017/309/ barton.pdf
work page 2017
-
[8]
W. Bergweiler and A. Eremenko , Green’s function and anti-holomorphic dynamics on a torus, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 144 (2016), pp. 2911–3061, https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/13044
-
[9]
C. L. Berman and L. Greengard , A renormalization method for the evaluation of lattice sums, Journal of Mathematical Physics, 35 (1994), pp. 6036–6048, https://doi.org/10. 1063/1.530726
work page 1994
-
[10]
B. Bogosel, The method of fundamental solutions applied to boundary eigenvalue problems , Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 306 (2016), pp. 265–285, https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cam.2016.04.008
-
[11]
J. M. Borwein, M. L. Glasser, R. C. McPhedran, J. G. Wan, and I. J. Zucker , Lattice Sums Then and Now, no. 150, Cambridge University Press, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1017/ cbo9781139626804
work page 2013
-
[12]
P. Cazeaux and O. Zahm, A fast boundary element method for the solution of periodic many- inclusion problems via hierarchical matrix techniques , ESAIM: Proceedings and Surveys, 48 (2015), p. 156–168, https://doi.org/10.1051/proc/201448006
-
[13]
Chandrasekharan, Elliptic functions , vol
K. Chandrasekharan, Elliptic functions , vol. 281, Springer, 1985, https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-642-52244-4
work page 1985
-
[14]
Oxford Univer- sity Press (2018).https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198814788.001.0001
D. Cioranescu and P. Donato, An Introduction to Homogenization, Oxford University Press, 11 1999, https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198565543.001.0001
-
[15]
Cohn, Conformal mapping on Riemann surfaces , McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1967
H. Cohn, Conformal mapping on Riemann surfaces , McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1967
work page 1967
-
[16]
A. Daniels, Note on Weierstrass’ methods in the theory of elliptic functions, American Journal of Mathematics, 6 (1883), pp. 177–182, https://doi.org/10.2307/2369218
-
[17]
Emersleben, Das Darcysche Filtergesetz, Physikalische Zeitschrift, 26 (1925), pp
O. Emersleben, Das Darcysche Filtergesetz, Physikalische Zeitschrift, 26 (1925), pp. 601–610
work page 1925
-
[18]
L. C. Evans, Partial differential equations, vol. 19, American Mathematical Society, second ed., 2010, https://doi.org/10.1090/gsm/019
-
[19]
P. P. Ewald , Die Berechnung optischer und elektrostatischer Gitterpotentiale , Annalen der Physik, 369 (1921), pp. 253–287, https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19213690304
-
[20]
G. B. Folland, Introduction to partial differential equations , Princeton University Press, sec- ond ed., 1995, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvzsmfgn. LAYER POTENTIAL METHODS FOR DOUBLY-PERIODIC HARMONIC FUNCTIONS 21
-
[21]
S. D. Gedney , On deriving a locally corrected Nystr¨ om scheme from a quadrature sampled moment method, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 51 (2003), pp. 2402– 2412, https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2003.816305
-
[22]
S. Gemmrich, N. Nigam, and O. Steinbach , Boundary Integral Equations for the Laplace- Beltrami Operator, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008, pp. 21–37, https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-540-68850-1 2
work page 2008
-
[23]
A. Girouard and I. Polterovich, Spectral geometry of the Steklov problem , Journal of Spec- tral Theory, 7 (2017), pp. 321–359, https://doi.org/10.4171/JST/164
-
[24]
T. Goodwill and M. O’Neil , An interface formulation of the Laplace-Beltrami problem on piecewise smooth surfaces, SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 55 (2023), pp. 7575– 7615, https://doi.org/10.1137/22m1538454
-
[25]
A. Greenbaum, L. Greengard, and G. B. McFadden, Laplace’s equation and the Dirichlet- Neumann map in multiply connected domains , Journal of Computational Physics, 105 (1993), pp. 267–278, https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1993.1073
-
[26]
L. Greengard and M. C. Kropinski , Integral equation methods for Stokes flow in doubly- periodic domains, Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 48 (2004), p. 157–170, https://doi. org/10.1023/b:engi.0000011923.59797.92
-
[27]
L. Greengard and M. Moura , On the numerical evaluation of electrostatic fields in composite materials , Acta Numerica, 3 (1994), p. 379–410, https://doi.org/10.1017/ s0962492900002464
work page 1994
-
[28]
L. Greengard and V. Rokhlin, A fast algorithm for particle simulations , Journal of Compu- tational Physics, 73 (1987), pp. 325–348, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(87)90140-9
-
[29]
Grisvard, Elliptic problems in nonsmooth domains , SIAM, 2011
P. Grisvard, Elliptic problems in nonsmooth domains , SIAM, 2011
work page 2011
-
[30]
Hafner, The Generalized Multipole Technique for Computational Electromagnetics, Artech House, 1990
C. Hafner, The Generalized Multipole Technique for Computational Electromagnetics, Artech House, 1990
work page 1990
-
[31]
S. Hao, A. H. Barnett, P. G. Martinsson, and P. Young, High-order accurate methods for Nystr¨ om discretization of integral equations on smooth curves in the plane , Advances in Computational Mathematics, (2014), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10444-013-9306-3
-
[32]
H. Hasimoto, On the periodic fundamental solutions of the Stokes equations and their appli- cation to viscous flow past a cubic array of spheres , Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 5 (1959), p. 317–328, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112059000222
-
[33]
H. Hasimoto, Periodic Fundamental Solution of a Two-Dimensional Poisson Equation , Jour- nal of the Physical Society of Japan, 77 (2008), p. 104601, https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ. 77.104601
-
[34]
J. Helsing , An integral equation method for elastostatics of periodic composites , Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 43 (1995), p. 815–828, https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0022-5096(95)00018-e
work page 1995
-
[35]
J. Helsing and R. Ojala, On the evaluation of layer potentials close to their sources , Journal of Computational Physics, 227 (2008), pp. 2899–2921, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2007. 11.024
-
[36]
P. Henrici, Applied and computational complex analysis, Volume 3: discrete Fourier analysis, Cauchy integrals, construction of conformal maps, univalent functions, John Wiley & Sons, 1986
work page 1986
-
[37]
J. D. Joannopoulos, S. G. Johnson, J. N. Winn, and R. D. Meade , Photonic Crystals: Molding the Flow of Light - Second Edition , Princeton University Press, 2011, https://doi. org/10.2307/j.ctvcm4gz9
-
[38]
C.-Y. Kao, B. Osting, and E. Oudet , Harmonic functions on finitely connected tori , SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 61 (2023), pp. 2795–2812, https://doi.org/10.1137/ 23M1569897
work page 2023
-
[39]
D. Kapanadze, G. Mishuris, and E. Pesetskaya, Exact solution to a nonlinear heat conduc- tion problem in doubly periodic 2D composite materials , Archives of Mechanics, (2015)
work page 2015
-
[40]
B. Kim, BIE periodic. https://github.com/BohyunKim92/BIE periodic, 2025
work page 2025
-
[41]
R. Kress , Boundary integral equations in time-harmonic acoustic scattering , Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 15 (1991), pp. 229–243, https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-7177(91) 90068-i
-
[42]
R. Kress , Linear integral equations , Springer, third ed., 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-1-4614-9593-2
work page 2014
-
[43]
M. C. A. Kropinski and N. Nigam , Fast integral equation methods for the Laplace-Beltrami equation on the sphere , Advances in Computational Mathematics, 40 (2014), p. 577–596, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10444-013-9319-y
-
[44]
P. Kuchment, An overview of periodic elliptic operators , Bulletin of the American Mathemat- ical Society, 53 (2016), p. 343–414, https://doi.org/10.1090/bull/1528. 22 B. KIM AND B. OSTING
-
[45]
P. K. Kundu, I. M. Cohen, and D. R. Dowling , Fluid Mechanics , Academic Press, fifth edition ed., 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-63410-3
-
[46]
N. Kuznetsov, T. Kulczycki, M. Kwa ´snicki, A. Nazarov, S. Poborchi, I. Polterovich, and B. Siudeja , The Legacy of Vladimir Andreevich Steklov , Notices of the AMS, 61 (2014), p. 190, https://www.ams.org/notices/201401/rnoti-p9.pdf
work page 2014
-
[47]
Lamb, Hydrodynamics, University Press, 1895, https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.18729
H. Lamb, Hydrodynamics, University Press, 1895, https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.18729
-
[48]
C.-S. Lin and C.-L. Wang , Elliptic functions, Green functions and the mean field equations on tori, Annals of Mathematics, (2010), pp. 911–954, https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2010. 172.911
-
[49]
D. Lindbo and A.-K. Tornberg , Spectral accuracy in fast Ewald-based methods for particle simulations, Journal of Computational Physics, 230 (2011), pp. 8744–8761, https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jcp.2011.08.022
-
[50]
W. C. H. McLean, Strongly elliptic systems and boundary integral equations , Cambridge uni- versity press, 2000
work page 2000
-
[51]
Mikhlin, Integral Equations, Pergamon, 1957, https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-08209-6
S. Mikhlin, Integral Equations, Pergamon, 1957, https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-08209-6
-
[52]
S. G. Mikhlin, Linear Integral Equations, Reprint, Dover Publications, 2020
work page 2020
-
[53]
M. Nahon and ´Edouard Oudet, Computation of harmonic functions on higher genus sur- faces, 2024, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.06763
-
[54]
M. M. S. Nasser, A. H. M. Murid, M. Ismail, and E. M. A. Alejaily , Boundary in- tegral equations with the generalized Neumann kernel for Laplace’s equation in multi- ply connected regions, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 217 (2011), p. 4710–4727, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2010.11.027
-
[55]
H. Ogata, K. Amano, M. Sugihara, and D. Okano , A fundamental solution method for viscous flow problems with obstacles in a periodic array , Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 152 (2003), pp. 411–425, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0427(02) 00720-3
-
[56]
Y. Otani and N. Nishimura , A fast multipole boundary integral equation method for peri- odic boundary value problems in three-dimensional elastostatics and its application to ho- mogenization, International Journal for Multiscale Computational Engineering, 4 (2006), p. 487–500, https://doi.org/10.1615/intjmultcompeng.v4.i4.60
-
[57]
E. Oudet, C.-Y. Kao, and B. Osting , Computation of free boundary minimal surfaces via extremal Steklov eigenvalue problems, ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Vari- ations, 27 (2021), p. 34, https://doi.org/10.1051/cocv/2021033
-
[58]
I. Polterovich, D. A. Sher, and J. A. Toth, Nodal length of Steklov eigenfunctions on real- analytic Riemannian surfaces , Journal f¨ ur die reine und angewandte Mathematik, (2019), pp. 17–47
work page 2019
-
[59]
C. Pozrikidis, Computation of periodic Green’s functions of Stokes flow , Journal of Engineer- ing Mathematics, 30 (1996), p. 79–96, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00118824
-
[60]
L. N. Trefethen , Series solution of Laplace problems , The ANZIAM Journal, 60 (2018), pp. 1–26, https://doi.org/10.1017/s1446181118000093
-
[61]
G. A. L. Van De Vorst , Integral formulation to simulate the viscous sintering of a two- dimensional lattice of periodic unit cells , Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 30 (1996), p. 97–118, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00118825
-
[62]
R. Wegmann and M. M. S. Nasser , The Riemann–Hilbert problem and the generalized Neu- mann kernel on multiply connected regions , Journal of Computational and Applied Math- ematics, 214 (2008), pp. 36–57, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2007.01.021. LAYER POTENTIAL METHODS FOR DOUBLY-PERIODIC HARMONIC FUNCTIONS 23 Appendix A. Proofs of lemmas in Sections 2–...
-
[63]
Notably, ℜDf[ϕ] = D[ϕ] is a function on Tτ \ ∂Ω, whereas ℑDf[ϕ] is not necessarily doubly-periodic
For ϕ ∈ C(∂Ω), Df[ϕ] is analytic on Pτ \ ∂Ω; therefore, both ℜDf[ϕ] and ℑDf[ϕ] are harmonic on Pτ \ ∂Ω. Notably, ℜDf[ϕ] = D[ϕ] is a function on Tτ \ ∂Ω, whereas ℑDf[ϕ] is not necessarily doubly-periodic
-
[64]
Note that Lemma A.3(2) follows from the Sokhotski-Plemelj formula in [42, Thm
For ϕ ∈ C(∂Ω), the complex double layer potential satisfies Df[ϕ](z± 0 ) = Kf[ϕ](z0) ∓ 1 2 ϕ(z0), z 0 ∈ ∂Ω. Note that Lemma A.3(2) follows from the Sokhotski-Plemelj formula in [42, Thm. 7.8], since ζ(z − ξ) admits a Laurent series with leading order ( z − ξ)−1 [48]. LAYER POTENTIAL METHODS FOR DOUBLY-PERIODIC HARMONIC FUNCTIONS 25 Proof. (1) Following [5...
-
[65]
We show that cj = 0 for all j = 1, 2, . . . , M. Let u(z) = M −1X j=1 cjS[ψj](z) for z ∈ Tτ =⇒ u(z) = −cM on D (because of (2.7)) . Note that ∆u(z) = 0 on Ω and u(z) is continuous throughout Tτ. Thus, u(z+ 0 ) = −cM implies u(z) ≡ −cM on Tτ . Finally, apply Lemma 2.3(2) for all z0 ∈ ∂Ω to obtain 0 = ∂νu(z+ 0 ) − ∂νu(z− 0 ) = M −1X j=1 cj ∂νS[ψj](z+ 0 ) − ...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.