Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 43 references

Fabrication-tolerant frequency conversion in thin film lithium niobate waveguide with layer-poled modal phase matching

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Layer-poled modal phase matching makes thin-film lithium niobate frequency converters 5 to 10 times less sensitive to fabrication errors than quasi-phase matching, while theoretically reaching higher efficiency.

desk verdict Tolerance-robustness claim for layer-poled MPM is real and worth attention, but the efficiency advantage is not yet experimentally closed. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.03402 v1 pith:YYULIFT4 submitted 2025-05-06 physics.optics physics.app-ph

O. Hefti (1 , 2) , J.-E. Tremblay (1) , A. Volpini (1) , Y. Koyaz (2) , I. Prieto (1) , O. Dubochet (1) , M. Despont (1)
show 13 more authors
H. Zarebidaki (1) C. Caër (1) J. Berney (1) S. Lecomte (1) H. Sattari (1) C.-S. Brès (2) D. Grassani (1) ((1) CSEM SA Rue de l'Observatoire 58 2000 Neuchâtel (CH) (2) EPFL Photonic Systems Laboratory (PHOSL) Rte Cantonale 1015 Lausanne (CH))
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.app-ph
keywords thinfilmlithiumniobatemodalphasematchinglayerpolingsecondharmonicgenerationquasi-phasefabricationtolerancedifferencefrequencyconversion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that in thin-film lithium niobate (TFLN) waveguides, a constant layer-poled pattern—a sign flip of the nonlinearity between the top and bottom of the waveguide—can replace the periodic poling used in quasi-phase matching for second-harmonic generation, and do it more robustly. The claim is that this modal phase matching (MPM) scheme shifts the phase-matched pump wavelength 3.5 to 11.5 times less than QPM for the same fabrication deviations in height, width, etch depth, and sidewall angle, while offering about 1.6 times higher efficiency at the ideal poling depth. The authors validate the concept in foundry-fabricated waveguides by poling after fabrication, measuring a normalized SHG efficiency of $(360 \pm 90)\%\,\mathrm{W^{-1}cm^{-2}}$, and demonstrating telecom-band intraband conversion via cascaded SHG and difference-frequency generation with $(280 \pm 60)\%\,\mathrm{W^{-2}}$ over more than 100 nm of bandwidth. If correct, this approach makes wafer-scale integrated frequency converters more reproducible and removes the most failure-prone part of TFLN fabrication: precise periodic poling with exact duty cycle.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the layer-poled waveguide cross-section: a constant, non-periodic electric-field poling of the bottom part of the TFLN film, modeled by Eq. (3) as $\chi^{(2)} = +\beta d_{33}$ above a depth $y=d$ and $-\beta d_{33}$ below it. This symmetry-breaking step puts the physical sign flip of the nonlinearity at the boundary between the two lobes of the TE$_{01}$ second-harmonic mode, so both lobes contribute constructively to the overlap integral and modal phase matching regains the efficiency it normally loses. The mechanism also carries the tolerance result: because no grating momentum is involved, the phase-matching wavelength is a function only of the modal dispersion of the waveguide, so a given error in $h$, $w$, $e$, or $\theta$ moves the wavelength far less than it would under QPM.

What would settle it

Take a waveguide with a measured cross-section, pole it to a characterized depth, and deliberately vary the width by a known amount while recording the MPM phase-matched wavelength shift; if the shift is not several times smaller than the QPM shift on a twin waveguide, the central tolerance claim is wrong. Alternatively, if a device with confirmed uniform poling at half the waveguide height still yields an efficiency an order of magnitude below simulation, the ideal step-function model of $\chi^{(2)}$ is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that layer-poled modal phase matching (MPM) achieves the phase-matching condition of a nonlinear process without any periodicity: by selectively poling the lower part of a TFLN waveguide all along its length, the effective $\chi^{(2)}$ flips sign at a depth $d$, and this vertical asymmetry couples the fundamental quasi-TE$_{00}$ pump to a higher-order quasi-TE$_{01}$ second-harmonic mode with high overlap. At $d=h/2$ this scheme is predicted to be about 1.6 times more efficient than QPM, because it avoids the $(2/\pi)^2$ QPM reduction factor even though the modal overlap is lower. Its robustness arises because the phase-matching wavelength depends only on the waveguide's dispersion—not on a poling period or duty cycle—so errors in cross-section dimensions shift $\lambda_p$ 3.5 to 11.5 times less than QPM for $h$, $w$, $e$, and $\theta$ (the exact factors are 5.4, 9.4, 11.5, and 6.1 with air cladding; 3.5, 6.9, 3.4, and 4.0 with SiO$_2$ cladding). Experimentally, the authors achieve SHG on the TE$_{01}$ mode with normalized efficiency $(360 \pm 90)\%\,\mathrm{W^{-1}cm^{-2}}$, confirm the expected quadratic power dependence, and use the SH as a pump for DFG to produce an idler in the telecom band with cascaded efficiency $(280 \pm 60)\%\,\mathrm{W^{-2}}$ over more than 100 nm. They attribute the factor-of-ten efficiency gap versus simulations to shallower than ideal poling (25 to 35 percent of the waveguide height rather than 50 percent) and longitudinal non-uniformity.

Load-bearing premise

The predicted efficiency and tolerance gains rest on the assumption that the poling creates a clean, uniform sign-flip of the nonlinearity at a well-defined depth, but the measured poling is only 25 to 35 percent of the waveguide height and uneven along its length.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Integrated TFLN frequency converters can be poled as a back-end step with no periodicity constraint, eliminating the duty-cycle and period tolerances that currently limit wafer-scale yield.
  • The phase-matched wavelength can be set by the lithographically defined waveguide width, giving a practical tuning lever of about 30 nm across the C-band for a 100 nm width change without strongly affecting guidance or efficiency.
  • The same waveguide can host cascaded SHG and difference-frequency generation, providing intraband telecom-band frequency conversion with over 100 nm bandwidth and an efficiency about 1000 times higher than FWM-based conversion in silicon nitride waveguides of similar length.
  • With the ideal poling depth, the paper predicts MPM would reach about 1.6 times the QPM efficiency and a cascaded conversion efficiency near $10^4\%\,\mathrm{W^{-2}}$, comparable to high-nonlinearity ring resonators but with much broader bandwidth.
  • The measured phase-matched wavelength of MPM closely tracked the simulated tolerance curve, showing the offset from design dimensions was 6.6 nm for MPM versus 80 nm for QPM on the same waveguide cross-section.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural engineering testable extension is to push the poled depth from the observed 25–35 percent toward the ideal 50 percent of waveguide height; if that closes most of the measured efficiency gap, the step-function model and its efficiency prediction would be strongly supported.
  • The near-linear dependence of the MPM phase-matched wavelength on width in the studied range suggests a design strategy of local width biasing to pre-compensate wafer-level cross-section variations, which is a direct corollary of the paper's data but not a claim the authors make explicitly.
  • It is plausible that the tolerance advantage extends to other three-wave-mixing processes, such as sum-frequency generation or parametric down-conversion, whenever phase matching is set by modal dispersion rather than a grating period, but the paper only demonstrates SHG and SHG-DFG.
  • The QPM sensitivity factors reported are tied to the particular waveguide geometry and mode pair; testing the same layer-poled MPM concept in other TFLN cross-sections or at other pump wavelengths would reveal whether the 3.5–11.5× robustness ratio is universal or geometry-specific.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes layer-poled modal phase matching (MPM) in thin-film lithium niobate (TFLN) waveguides as a fabrication-tolerant alternative to conventional quasi-phase matching (QPM) for second-harmonic generation (SHG). It presents a coupled-mode theory (Eqs. 1–3) and simulations showing that the phase-matched pump wavelength is 3.5–6.9 times less sensitive to waveguide height, width, etch depth, and sidewall angle in SiO2-cladded waveguides (5.4–11.5 times in air-cladded designs) than in QPM, and that at an ideal poling depth of half the waveguide height MPM is theoretically 1.6 times more efficient. Experimentally, the authors fabricate foundry-process TFLN waveguides, pole them post-fabrication while monitoring SHG in real time, demonstrate MPM and QPM SHG on the same waveguide, tune the MPM wavelength by width, and show cascaded SHG–DFG intraband conversion over >100 nm. The measured MPM SHG efficiency is (360 ± 90) %/W/cm2, about an order of magnitude below simulation, which the supplementary attributes to shallower-than-ideal poling depth, non-uniform poling, and unquantified losses.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this work offers a practical route to more reproducible frequency conversion in TFLN photonic circuits by removing dependence on periodic poling quality and reducing sensitivity to geometric fabrication errors. The strength of the paper is that the tolerance ratios in Section II.B are computed from first-principles mode-overlap simulations and are not fitted to the experimental data; the phase-matching wavelength trends versus width and poling period are confirmed experimentally. The real-time poling monitoring and the cascaded SHG–DFG demonstration are valuable contributions. However, the efficiency advantage over QPM is not experimentally established at the currently achieved poling depths, and the abstract's '5 to 10 times' robustness range overstates the values for the actually fabricated SiO2-cladded waveguides.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Section II.B] The abstract claims '5 to 10 times more robust' toward fabrication uncertainties, but the sensitivity ratios reported in Section II.B for SiO2-cladded waveguides—the cladding used in the fabricated devices—are 3.5, 6.9, 3.4, and 4.0 for h, w, e, and θ, respectively. The 5-to-10 range applies only to air-cladded waveguides (5.4, 9.4, 11.5, and 6.1). This discrepancy is load-bearing because the central claim is the robustness advantage; the abstract should be adjusted to the actual range or the claims should be specifically separated by cladding type.
  2. [Section III.D and Supplementary A] The claim that MPM is 'theoretically more efficient' and enables conversion 'without sacrificing conversion efficiency' is not experimentally supported. The measured SHG efficiency of (360 ± 90) %/W/cm2 is about an order of magnitude below the simulated value for an ideal half-height poled step, and the supplementary infers the actual poling depth is only 25–35% of the waveguide height with longitudinal non-uniformity. No QPM efficiency is reported on the same waveguides, so the 'without sacrificing conversion efficiency' claim rests on a simulation of a poling profile that the fabrication process does not currently deliver.
  3. [Eq. (3) and Fig. 1(d)] Equation (3) models χ(2) as an ideal step function that flips sign at a well-defined depth d, uniform along the waveguide and across the full cross-section. This idealization is not a problem for the phase-matching-wavelength tolerance analysis, which depends mainly on modal dispersion, but it is critical for the efficiency predictions in Fig. 1(d). The paper shows that the maximum MPM efficiency occurs at d/h = 50%, yet the process yields d/h ≈ 25–35% (Supplementary Fig. 1). This should be stated explicitly as a limitation of the current demonstration, or the efficiency superiority claim should be reframed as conditional on an ideal poling profile.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption states 'the waveguide width is 1000 (1177) µ m' but the values are in nanometers; this is a typo that should be corrected.
  2. [Section III.B] The electric field units are inconsistent: the text mentions '55 V/um' and later '60 kV/um'. The poling fields are presumably tens of V/µm throughout; the kV unit should be corrected.
  3. [Section II.A] In the definition of χ(2) for QPM, the statement that χ(2)=0 for y>d is introduced briefly; it would be clearer to explicitly state that this excludes the slab region that is not inverted, especially because Fig. 1(e) shows a blurred area.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the robustness ratios and theoretical efficiency advantage are derived from self-contained mode-overlap simulations, not from the fitted experimental parameters.

full rationale

The central robustness claim (5–10x lower dλp/dx for MPM than QPM) is computed in Section II.B from standard mode-overlap simulations using material constants and Eq. (3), with no measured data fitted to produce those sensitivity ratios. The experimental data independently corroborate the slope asymmetry: MPM λp is flat versus poling period while QPM is steep (Fig. 4a). The fitted cross-section (h=596 nm, e=463 nm) is used only to explain the offset of the fabricated device from nominal design and to estimate the efficiency shortfall; it is not used to define the sensitivity ratio. The theoretical efficiency comparison (MPM 1.6x QPM) follows from the overlap integrals in Eqs. (1)–(3) evaluated at the respective optimal poling depths; it is an idealization, and the paper explicitly acknowledges that the measured efficiency is an order of magnitude below simulation because the actual poling depth is 25–35% of the height and longitudinally non-uniform (Supplementary), which is a limitation rather than a circular step. The only self-citation (Ref. 21, a prior CLEO paper with overlapping authors) is used to motivate that poling etched waveguides can introduce vertical χ(2) asymmetry, but the present paper validates this experimentally on foundry-fabricated waveguides, so the citation is not load-bearing. No equation reduces to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard coupled-mode theory for SHG, the assumption that post-fabrication poling realizes an ideal step-function χ(2) profile at a uniform depth d (Eq. 3), and the assumption that the TE01 mode is guided with negligible loss under the studied geometries. The paper introduces no new entities; the only fitted numbers are the inferred poling depth (25 to 35 percent of height) and the effective etch depth (463 nm) used to explain the measured wavelength offset.

free parameters (2)
  • Poling depth d = Not fitted in theory; in experiments, inferred from TPM as 25 to 35 percent of the waveguide height.
    The MPM efficiency model Eq. (3) depends on d; the experimental SHG efficiency is ten times below the d=h/2 ideal, which the authors attribute to d being only 25 to 35 percent of the height.
  • Effective etch depth e (offset model) = 463 nm (nominal 400 nm).
    Chosen, together with h=596 nm from ellipsometry, to reproduce the observed QPM and MPM phase-matched wavelengths in Fig. 4(a). This is a fit to the data, used for explaining the offset, not for the tolerance claim.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Eq. (3): χ(2)(x,y)=β d33 for y>d, -β d33 for y<d, with β=1 for MPM and 2/π for QPM.
    The paper assumes electric-field poling after etching produces an ideal step-function sign reversal of the nonlinear coefficient below a depth d, with no partial-domain effects; the efficiency gap discussion in the supplementary shows this assumption is only approximately true.
  • standard math The coupled-mode overlap formulas (Eqs. 1-2) are valid for SHG in the undepleted-pump regime.
    Standard coupled-mode theory is invoked without derivation; appropriate for the weakly nonlinear regime observed in the experiments.
  • domain assumption The TE01 mode at the SH wavelength is guided with negligible leakage for the designs used.
    Used in the efficiency and sensitivity simulations; Section II.B notes leakage losses become dB/cm for shallow e, restricting the valid design range.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fabrication-tolerant frequency conversion in thin film lithium niobate waveguide with layer-poled modal phase matching." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YYULIFT4

@misc{pith2026250503402,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fabrication-tolerant frequency conversion in thin film lithium niobate waveguide with layer-poled modal phase matching},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YYULIFT4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.03402}
}
read the original abstract

Thanks to its high quadratic nonlinear susceptibilty and low propagation losses, thin film lithium niobate (TFLN) on insulator is an ideal platform for laser frequency conversion and generation of quantum states of light. Frequency conversion is usually achieved by quasi-phase matching (QPM) via electric-field poling. However, this scheme shows very high sensitivity to the dimensions of the waveguide, poling period and duty cycle, resulting in a lack of repeatability of the phase matched wavelength and efficiency, which in turn limits the spread of TFLN frequency converters in complex circuits and hinders wafer-scale production. Here we propose a layer-poled modal phase matching (MPM) that is 5 to 10 times more robust towards fabrication uncertainties and theoretically more efficient than conventional QPM. By selectively poling the bottom part of the waveguide all along its length, second harmonic is efficiently generated on a higher order waveguide's mode. We validate this approach by poling TFLN waveguides as a post-process after the fabrication in a foundry process. We perform a tolerance analysis and compare the experimental results with conventional QPM second harmonic generation process on the same waveguides. Then, we show how MPM can be exploited to obtain efficient intraband frequency conversion processes at telecom wavelengths by leveraging simultaneous second harmonic and difference frequency generation in the same waveguide.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.03402 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Poling configuration maximizing the SH conversion efficiency in the case of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Simulated phase matched wavelengths in the case of QPM and MPM as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png]
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Normalized experimental SHG spectrum (blue line) and simulated one (red line) rescaled to obtain the same integral area. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    u sing , author J. Zhao , author B. Kirbus , author S. Mookherjea ,\ and\ author L. M. \ Eng ,\ title title “seeing is believing

    author author S. Reitzig , author M. R \"u sing , author J. Zhao , author B. Kirbus , author S. Mookherjea ,\ and\ author L. M. \ Eng ,\ title title “seeing is believing”—in-depth analysis by co-imaging of periodically-poled x-cut lithium niobate thin films , \ @noop journal journal Crystals \ volume 11 ,\ pages 288 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Boes , author L

    author author A. Boes , author L. Chang , author C. Langrock , author M. Yu , author M. Zhang , author Q. Lin , author M. Lon c ar , author M. Fejer , author J. Bowers ,\ and\ author A. Mitchell ,\ title title Lithium niobate photonics: Unlocking the electromagnetic spectrum , \ @noop journal journal Science \ volume 379 ,\ pages eabj4396 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    author author A. E. \ Willner , author S. Khaleghi , author M. R. \ Chitgarha ,\ and\ author O. F. \ Yilmaz ,\ title title All-optical signal processing , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Lightwave Technology \ volume 32 ,\ pages 660--680 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    Xin , author J

    author author C. Xin , author J. Mishra , author C. Chen , author D. Zhu , author A. Shams-Ansari , author C. Langrock , author N. Sinclair , author F. N. \ Wong , author M. Fejer ,\ and\ author M. Lon c ar ,\ title title Spectrally separable photon-pair generation in dispersion engineered thin-film lithium niobate , \ @noop journal journal Optics Letters...

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Ultraviolet astronomical spectrograph calibration with laser frequency combs from nanophotonic lithium niobate waveguides

    author author M. Ludwig , author F. Ayhan , author T. M. \ Schmidt , author T. Wildi , author T. Voumard , author R. Blum , author Z. Ye , author F. Lei , author F. Wildi , author F. Pepe , et al. ,\ title title Ultraviolet astronomical spectrograph calibration with laser frequency combs from nanophotonic waveguides , \ @noop journal journal arXiv preprin...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    author author H. S. \ Stokowski , author T. P. \ McKenna , author T. Park , author A. Y. \ Hwang , author D. J. \ Dean , author O. T. \ Celik , author V. Ansari , author M. M. \ Fejer ,\ and\ author A. H. \ Safavi-Naeini ,\ title title Integrated quantum optical phase sensor in thin film lithium niobate , \ @noop journal journal Nature Communications \ vo...

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    author author R. W. \ Boyd , author A. L. \ Gaeta ,\ and\ author E. Giese ,\ title title Nonlinear optics , \ in\ @noop booktitle Springer Handbook of Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics \ ( publisher Springer ,\ year 2008 )\ pp.\ pages 1097--1110 NoStop

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    Zhu , author L

    author author D. Zhu , author L. Shao , author M. Yu , author R. Cheng , author B. Desiatov , author C. Xin , author Y. Hu , author J. Holzgrafe , author S. Ghosh , author A. Shams-Ansari , et al. ,\ title title Integrated photonics on thin-film lithium niobate , \ @noop journal journal Advances in Optics and Photonics \ volume 13 ,\ pages 242--352 ( year...

    work page 2021

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    Zhao , author M

    author author J. Zhao , author M. R \"u sing , author U. A. \ Javid , author J. Ling , author M. Li , author Q. Lin ,\ and\ author S. Mookherjea ,\ title title Shallow-etched thin-film lithium niobate waveguides for highly-efficient second-harmonic generation , \ @noop journal...

    2020

  2. [10]

    Rao , author K

    author author A. Rao , author K. Abdelsalam , author T. Sjaardema , author A. Honardoost , author G. F. \ Camacho-Gonzalez ,\ and\ author S. Fathpour ,\ title title Actively-monitored periodic-poling in thin-film lithium niobate photonic waveguides with ultrahigh nonlinear con...

    2019

  3. [11]

    Koyaz , author C

    author author Y. Koyaz , author C. Lafforgue , author H. Zarebidaki , author O. Hefti , author D. Grassani , author H. Sattari ,\ and\ author C.-S. \ Br \`e s ,\ title title Ultrabroadband tunable difference frequency generation in a standardized thin-film lithium niobate plat...

    2024

  4. [12]

    Wang , author C

    author author C. Wang , author C. Langrock , author A. Marandi , author M. Jankowski , author M. Zhang , author B. Desiatov , author M. M. \ Fejer ,\ and\ author M. Lon c ar ,\ title title Ultrahigh-efficiency wavelength conversion in nanophotonic periodically poled lithium ni...

    2018

  5. [13]

    Jankowski , author J

    author author M. Jankowski , author J. Mishra ,\ and\ author M. Fejer ,\ title title Dispersion-engineered nanophotonics: a flexible tool for nonclassical light , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Physics: Photonics \ volume 3 ,\ pages 042005 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021

  6. [14]

    Xin , author S

    author author C. Xin , author S. Lu , author J. Yang , author A. Shams-Ansari , author B. Desiatov , author L. S. \ Magalh \ a es , author S. S. \ Ghosh , author E. McGee , author D. Renaud , author N. Achuthan , et al. ,\ title title Wavelength-accurate and wafer-scale proces...

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Boes , author L

    author author A. Boes , author L. Chang , author T. Nguyen , author G. Ren , author J. Bowers ,\ and\ author A. Mitchell ,\ title title Efficient second harmonic generation in lithium niobate on insulator waveguides and its pitfalls , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Physics...

    2021

  8. [16]

    Vandekerckhove , author J

    author author T. Vandekerckhove , author J. De Witte , author L. De Jaeger , author E. Vissers , author S. Janssen , author P. Verheyen , author N. Singh , author D. Bode , author M. Davi , author F. Ferraro , et al. ,\ title title A scalable quadratic nonlinear silicon photon...

    2025 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Luo , author Y

    author author R. Luo , author Y. He , author H. Liang , author M. Li ,\ and\ author Q. Lin ,\ title title Semi-nonlinear nanophotonic waveguides for highly efficient second-harmonic generation , \ @noop journal journal Laser & Photonics Reviews \ volume 13 ,\ pages 1800288 ( y...

    2019

  10. [18]

    Zhang , author C

    author author X. Zhang , author C. Sun , author B. Xiong , author Z. Hao , author J. Wang , author L. Wang , author Y. Han , author H. Li ,\ and\ author Y. Luo ,\ title title Antisymmetric-nonlinear lnoi waveguide for highly efficient second-harmonic generation , \ in\ @noop b...

    2020

  11. [19]

    Wang , author X

    author author L. Wang , author X. Zhang ,\ and\ author F. Chen ,\ title title Efficient second harmonic generation in a reverse-polarization dual-layer crystalline thin film nanophotonic waveguide , \ @noop journal journal Laser & Photonics Reviews \ volume 15 ,\ pages 2100409...

    2021

  12. [20]

    Wu , author Z

    author author X. Wu , author Z. Hao , author L. Zhang , author D. Jia , author R. Ma , author C. Tao , author F. Gao , author F. Bo , author G. Zhang ,\ and\ author J. Xu ,\ title title Second-harmonic generation with a 440 000\ efficiency in a lithium niobate microcavity with...

    2023

  13. [21]

    Du , author X

    author author H. Du , author X. Zhang , author H. Lv , author J. Lin , author L. Wang ,\ and\ author F. Chen ,\ title title High-efficiency second harmonic generation in a micro-resonator on dual-layered lithium niobate , \ @noop journal journal Optics Letters \ volume 49 ,\ p...

    2024

  14. [22]

    Hefti , author J.-E

    author author O. Hefti , author J.-E. \ Tremblay , author A. Volpini , author H. Zarebidaki , author I. Prieto , author O. Dubochet , author M. Despont , author S. Lecomte , author C.-S. \ Br \`e s , author H. Sattari , et al. ,\ title title Symmetry breaking of the (2) polari...

    2024

  15. [23]

    Shi , author S

    author author X. Shi , author S. S. \ Mohanraj , author V. Dhyani , author A. A. \ Baiju , author S. Wang , author J. Sun , author L. Zhou , author A. Paterova , author V. Leong ,\ and\ author D. Zhu ,\ title title Efficient photon-pair generation in layer-poled lithium niobat...

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Shoji , author T

    author author I. Shoji , author T. Kondo , author A. Kitamoto , author M. Shirane ,\ and\ author R. Ito ,\ title title Absolute scale of second-order nonlinear-optical coefficients , \ @noop journal journal JOSA B \ volume 14 ,\ pages 2268--2294 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

    1997

  17. [25]

    Hu \ and\ author C

    author author J. Hu \ and\ author C. R. \ Menyuk ,\ title title Understanding leaky modes: slab waveguide revisited , \ @noop journal journal Advances in Optics and Photonics \ volume 1 ,\ pages 58--106 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    2009

  18. [26]

    Boes , author L

    author author A. Boes , author L. Chang , author M. Knoerzer , author T. G. \ Nguyen , author J. D. \ Peters , author J. E. \ Bowers ,\ and\ author A. Mitchell ,\ title title Improved second harmonic performance in periodically poled lnoi waveguides through engineering of late...

    2019

  19. [27]

    author author CSEM ,\ @noop title Thin-film lithium niobate foundry services by csem , \ howpublished https://www.csem.ch/en/tailored-services/tfln-foundry-services/ ( year 2025 ),\ note accessed: 2025-04-07 NoStop

    2025

  20. [28]

    He , author M

    author author L. He , author M. Zhang , author A. Shams-Ansari , author R. Zhu , author C. Wang ,\ and\ author L. Marko ,\ title title Low-loss fiber-to-chip interface for lithium niobate photonic integrated circuits , \ @noop journal journal Optics letters \ volume 44 ,\ page...

    2019

  21. [29]

    Grassani , author M

    author author D. Grassani , author M. H. \ Pfeiffer , author T. J. \ Kippenberg ,\ and\ author C.-S. \ Bres ,\ title title Second-and third-order nonlinear wavelength conversion in an all-optically poled si3n4 waveguide , \ @noop journal journal Optics Letters \ volume 44 ,\ p...

    2018

  22. [30]

    author author M. A. \ Foster , author A. C. \ Turner , author J. E. \ Sharping , author B. S. \ Schmidt , author M. Lipson ,\ and\ author A. L. \ Gaeta ,\ title title Broad-band optical parametric gain on a silicon photonic chip , \ @noop journal journal Nature \ volume 441 ,\...

    2006

  23. [31]

    Borghi , author C

    author author M. Borghi , author C. Castellan , author S. Signorini , author A. Trenti ,\ and\ author L. Pavesi ,\ title title Nonlinear silicon photonics , \ @noop \ volume 19 ,\ pages 093002 NoStop

  24. [32]

    Azzini , author D

    author author S. Azzini , author D. Grassani , author M. Galli , author L. Andreani , author M. Sorel , author M. Strain , author L. Helt , author J. Sipe , author M. Liscidini ,\ and\ author D. Bajoni ,\ title title From classical four-wave mixing to parametric fluorescence i...

  25. [33]

    Monat , author M

    author author C. Monat , author M. Ebnali-Heidari , author C. Grillet , author B. Corcoran , author B. J. \ Eggleton , author T. P. \ White , author L. O’Faolain , author J. Li ,\ and\ author T. F. \ Krauss ,\ title title Four-wave mixing in slow light engineered silicon photo...

  26. [34]

    Trita , author C

    author author A. Trita , author C. Lacava , author P. Minzioni , author J.-P. \ Colonna , author P. Gautier , author J.-M. \ Fedeli ,\ and\ author I. Cristiani ,\ title title Ultra-high four wave mixing efficiency in slot waveguides with silicon nanocrystals , \ @noop \ volume...

  27. [35]

    Matthey , author F

    author author R. Matthey , author F. Gruet , author S. Schilt ,\ and\ author G. Mileti ,\ title title Compact rubidium-stabilized multi-frequency reference source in the 1.55- m region , \ @noop journal journal Optics letters \ volume 40 ,\ pages 2576--2579 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  28. [36]

    Mottola , author G

    author author R. Mottola , author G. Buser ,\ and\ author P. Treutlein ,\ title title Optical memory in a microfabricated rubidium vapor cell , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.260801 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 131 ,\ pages 260801 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    doi

  29. [37]

    Bersin , author M

    author author E. Bersin , author M. Sutula , author Y. Q. \ Huan , author A. Suleymanzade , author D. R. \ Assumpcao , author Y.-C. \ Wei , author P.-J. \ Stas , author C. M. \ Knaut , author E. N. \ Knall , author C. Langrock , author N. Sinclair , author R. Murphy , author R...

  30. [38]

    author author T. A. \ Wright , author R. J. \ Francis-Jones , author C. B. \ Gawith , author J. N. \ Becker , author P. M. \ Ledingham , author P. G. \ Smith , author J. Nunn , author P. J. \ Mosley , author B. Brecht ,\ and\ author I. A. \ Walmsley ,\ title title Two-way phot...

    2018

  31. [39]

    Cornelis , author G

    author author F. Cornelis , author G. Soumya , author R. Caique , author X. CJ , author P. Keith , author Y. JIayu , author L. Shengyuan , author S. Neil , author B. Klaus ,\ and\ author L. Marko ,\ title title Sidewall poled lithium niobate ridge waveguides for efficient uv g...

    2024

  32. [40]

    Du , author X

    author author H. Du , author X. Zhang , author L. Wang ,\ and\ author F. Chen ,\ title title Highly efficient, modal phase-matched second harmonic generation in a double-layered thin film lithium niobate waveguide , \ @noop journal journal Optics Express \ volume 31 ,\ pages 9...

    2023

  33. [41]

    Sabatti , author J

    author author A. Sabatti , author J. Kellner , author F. Kaufmann , author R. J. \ Chapman , author G. Finco , author T. Kuttner , author A. Maeder ,\ and\ author R. Grange ,\ title title Extremely high extinction ratio electro-optic modulator via frequency upconversion to vis...

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Du , author X

    author author H. Du , author X. Zhang , author L. Wang , author Y. Jia ,\ and\ author F. Chen ,\ title title Tunable sum-frequency generation in modal phase-matched thin film lithium niobate rib waveguides , \ @noop journal journal Optics Letters \ volume 48 ,\ pages 3159--316...

    2023

  35. [43]

    Kaufmann , author G

    author author F. Kaufmann , author G. Finco , author A. Maeder ,\ and\ author R. Grange ,\ title title Redeposition-free inductively-coupled plasma etching of lithium niobate for integrated photonics , \ @noop journal journal Nanophotonics \ volume 12 ,\ pages 1601--1611 ( yea...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.