Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 229 references

Extremely Low Mass Ratio Contact Binaries. II. The First Photometric and Spectroscopic Investigations of Six Systems with Orbital Periods Longer than 0.5 days

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read This paper reports six contact binaries with orbital periods above 0.5 day and photometric mass ratios below 0.15, classing them as extremely low mass-ratio contact binaries, and derives a cutoff mass ratio of 0.021 ± 0.004.

desk verdict A useful data paper on six long-period contact binaries whose ELMRCB classification is plausible but rests on photometric q values with underestimated scatter; the beta-f "discovery" is a tautology. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.04029 v1 pith:XDSS3ORK submitted 2025-05-07 astro-ph.SR

classification astro-ph.SR
keywords contactbinariesextremelylowmassratioWUMastarsWilson-Devinneylight-curvesolutionsorbitalperiodvariationchromosphericactivitycutoffeclipsing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first photometric and spectroscopic study of six contact binary systems with orbital periods longer than 0.5 day. The authors find that all six have mass ratios below 0.15, placing them in the extremely low mass-ratio contact binary (ELMRCB) class, which is rare at such long periods and may represent pre-merger systems. Because the light curves show flat-bottomed total eclipses, the mass ratios come from photometric Wilson–Devinney modeling without radial velocities. The paper also assembles 218 contact binaries with spectroscopically reliable mass ratios and concludes that for ELMRCBs the energy transfer parameter is independent of contact degree, and that the mass-ratio cutoff for merging is about $q_{\rm min} = 0.021 \pm 0.004$.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing tool is the Wilson–Devinney light-curve solver applied to TESS and ground-based photometry, with the mass ratio found by a $q$-search that minimizes residuals. Its validity for these targets rests on the flat-bottomed minima, the signature of total eclipses, combined with the statistical $q_{\rm phot}\approx q_{\rm spec}$ calibration for totally eclipsing contact binaries. The statistical analysis then uses the exponential fit $q=e^{-3.86137 f}$ to the 218-system sample, which yields the cutoff $q_{\rm min}$ at $f=100\%$, and the energy-transfer parameter $\beta$ computed from bolometric luminosity ratios.

What would settle it

Measure radial velocities of the six components; if any system's spectroscopic mass ratio exceeds 0.15 or disagrees with the photometric $q$ by more than the combined uncertainties, the ELMRCB classification for that target fails. A cheaper test is to inspect high-cadence TESS light curves for V-shaped rather than flat-bottomed minima at secondary eclipse.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that extremely low mass-ratio contact binaries exist at orbital periods longer than 0.5 day: for all six targets the photometric mass ratio is $q<0.15$, five being A-subtype and one W-subtype. The authors argue that the flat minima at phase 0.5 prove total eclipses, which make photometric mass ratios statistically equivalent to spectroscopic ones, so the ELMRCB classification is secure without radial-velocity data. They further derive absolute parameters, find period increases for three systems and decreases for two, detect no chromospheric activity in any spectrum, and, from a 218-system sample, report a negative exponential relation between contact degree $f$ and mass ratio $q$, which extrapolated to $f=100\%$ gives a predicted cutoff mass ratio $q_{\rm min}=0.021\pm0.004$.

Load-bearing premise

The decisive assumption is that no target has a partial eclipse, so the photometric mass ratios—which disagree across telescopes by more than their formal errors—can be trusted as equivalent to spectroscopic values; if any light curve is actually partial, that system's $q<0.15$ classification may be wrong.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The six systems enlarge the known ELMRCB population at $P>0.5$ d, the period range where true contact binaries were predicted to be rare.
  • Photometric surveys can efficiently find pre-merger candidates, since no radial velocities are required when flat-bottomed total eclipses are present.
  • The energy transfer parameter being independent of contact degree for ELMRCBs implies that energy flow between components is not controlled by how deep the common envelope is.
  • A cutoff mass ratio of $0.021\pm0.004$ at full contact gives a concrete target for merger searches: systems with $q$ near this value are the most promising.
  • Secular period changes in five systems constrain mass transfer and angular momentum loss rates in the late evolutionary stage.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The cross-telescope scatter in $q$ (for example 0.075–0.106 for J063344) suggests systematic uncertainties well beyond the quoted errors, and a few of the six may have true $q$ above 0.15, which would shrink the claimed sample.
  • The $f$–$q$ exponential fit mixes photometric and spectroscopic determinations; an independent radial-velocity-based check of $f$–$q$ on a clean sample would test whether the $q_{\rm min}=0.021$ extrapolation is real or an artifact of the fit form.
  • If the $q_{\rm min}$ prediction is correct, low-amplitude variables with $P>0.5$ d and flat minima in TESS sectors should yield many more ELMRCBs, and counting them would give a direct test.
  • The conclusion that energy transfer is independent of contact degree could be tested by comparing $\beta$ with $f$ for the growing TESS sample rather than the 218-system sample.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents the first photometric and spectroscopic analysis of six contact binaries with orbital periods longer than 0.5 days. Using Wilson–Devinney modeling of TESS and ground-based light curves, the authors derive photometric mass ratios between 0.083 and 0.150 and classify all six systems as extremely low mass-ratio contact binaries (ELMRCBs, q<0.15). LAMOST spectra are analyzed with the spectral subtraction method and show no chromospheric emission lines. The paper also reports orbital period changes from O–C diagrams, derives absolute parameters and evolutionary states, and compiles a sample of 218 contact binaries with radial-velocity mass ratios to study correlations between energy transfer parameter, contact degree, and mass ratio. The main conclusions are that the energy transfer parameter is independent of contact degree for ELMRCBs and that the cutoff mass ratio is q_min=0.021.

Significance. If the central classification is correct, the paper adds six long-period ELMRCBs to a rare class and provides a useful compilation of 218 radial-velocity-analyzed contact binaries. The multi-band photometry, TESS coverage, and LAMOST spectroscopy are new and the systems are individually of interest. However, the headline result rests entirely on photometric mass ratios without radial velocities, and the quoted errors on q appear to underestimate the cross-telescope scatter by an order of magnitude. The beta–f independence result is a property of the adopted formula rather than an empirical finding, and the period-change claims are not statistically significant. These issues currently prevent the paper from supporting its main claims.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3, Table 5, Tables A2–A7] The central claim that all six targets have q<0.15 is not supported by the adopted TESS solution for J073647, for which Table 5 gives q=0.150±0.001, exactly at the boundary of the paper's own ELMRCB definition (q<0.15). Moreover, the photometric q values from different telescopes disagree by up to ~0.03 (e.g., J063344: 0.075–0.106; J073647: 0.112–0.150; J105032: 0.117–0.141), far exceeding the quoted formal errors of 0.001–0.005. The q-search diagrams in Figure 2 are shown without confidence intervals, so the reader cannot determine whether q>0.15 is excluded by the data. The authors should justify their choice of TESS as the primary dataset, report a realistic systematic uncertainty on q, and provide confidence intervals or a quantitative comparison of the q-search minima before classifying all six systems as ELMRCBs.
  2. [Section 3 and Section 6] The paper asserts that the light curves show flat-bottomed (total) eclipses (Section 6), which underlies the q_phot≈q_spec assumption (Pribulla et al. 2003), but no quantitative flatness test is presented. This is especially critical for J105032, whose TESS inclination is i=70.8°±0.6°; with r1=0.586 and r2=0.238, the condition for a total eclipse (cos i < r1−r2) gives a threshold i≈69.6°, leaving only about 1.2° of margin. A modest systematic error in q or i would make the eclipse partial, invalidating the q_phot≈q_spec guarantee and the ELMRCB classification. Please provide residual-based flatness tests and a margin analysis for all six targets.
  3. [Section 6(b), Eq. (13)] The conclusion that the energy transfer parameter is independent of contact degree is not an empirical result. Equation (13) defines beta as a function of q and T2/T1 only, with no contact-degree term, and for q<0.15 the q-dependent terms are numerically negligible. The reported slope of -1.6×10^-4 in the beta–f fit is therefore a property of the adopted formula, not a discovery from the data. The abstract's statement about beta being independent of f should be removed, or the analysis should use an independent estimate of beta (e.g., from observed luminosities and ZAMS models) before drawing this conclusion.
  4. [Section 4, Table 8] The orbital period-change claims are not statistically significant. In Table 8, J094123 has beta=(-3.95±9.80), J105032 beta=(-2.72±3.50), J063344 beta=(3.85±3.08), J073647 beta=(3.85±2.65), and J163001 beta=(1.71±1.69) in the quoted units; none of these reaches the 2-sigma level. The Abstract's statements that three targets show secular period increase and two show secular period decrease, as well as the mass-transfer rates in Table 8, are therefore not supported by the quoted uncertainties. The authors should report these as tentative trends or apply a significance threshold and revise the Abstract accordingly.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Section 6] The phrase 'mass ratios are smaller than 0.15' is inaccurate for J073647, whose adopted TESS value is q=0.150; please use '≤0.15' or reclassify the system.
  2. [Section 3, Figure 2] The q-search diagrams would be substantially more informative if they included confidence bands (e.g., 1-sigma or 3-sigma levels on Sigma(q)), since they are the basis for the ELMRCB classification.
  3. [Section 4] The caveat that the O–C analysis 'should be interpreted with caution, as the time span is not sufficiently long' should be reflected in the Abstract and in the qualitative claims of period increase or decrease; currently the Abstract presents these as established results.
  4. [Section 6] The use of the empirical a–P relation (Eq. 4) from Paper I to derive absolute parameters is an assumption, and the quoted parameter uncertainties do not include the intrinsic scatter of that relation; this limitation should be acknowledged explicitly.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The β–f independence claim is built into the definition of β, and the β−β_min 'confirmation' is a model self-consistency check; the six-system photometric discovery itself is not circular.

  1. self definitional [Section 6(a)–6(b), Equations (13)–(14) and Figure 9(b)]
    "The energy transfer parameter (β) can be calculated with the following equation, β = L1,obs/L1,ZAMS = (1+q^4.6)/(1+q^0.92(T2/T1)^4) ... Thus, we performed a linear fit of f versus β for ELMRCBs, obtaining a slope of −1.6×10−4 ∼ 0. Consequently, we estimate that the energy transfer parameter between the two components of ELMRCBs is independent of the contact degree."

    Equation (13) defines β using only q and T2/T1; the contact degree f does not appear anywhere in the definition. Therefore, plotting β against f and finding a near-zero slope is not an empirical test of physical f-dependence: it merely shows that a quantity constructed without f is nearly uncorrelated with f in the narrow ELMRCB q range. The conclusion 'independent of the contact degree' is thus built into the operational definition of β rather than established by the data.

  2. self definitional [Section 6(a), after Equations (13)–(14)]
    "Csizmadia & Klagyivik (2004) derived β−β_min = 0.52q^4.1 indicating that the difference between β and β_min decreases when the mass ratio gets smaller. Therefore, the diagram confirms the conclusion."

    Both β and β_min are computed from the same Csizmadia & Klagyivik model using Equations (13) and (14), rather than being measured independently. The 'diagram confirms' the analytic relation because the plotted points are generated from the same formulas with the same underlying assumptions; this is a consistency check of the model definitions, not an independent confirmation of the relation.

full rationale

The paper's core observational work—first-time photometric and spectroscopic investigation of six contact binaries, W-D modeling, O-C period analysis, and spectral subtraction—is not circular. The photometric mass ratios are model-dependent and the lack of radial velocities is a correctness risk, but that is not a circularity. The self-citations to Pribulla et al. (2003) and Li et al. (2021a) are external statistical calibrations and do not by themselves make the photometric q claim circular. The two statistical conclusions in Section 6, however, are circular: the claimed independence of β from contact degree is forced by Equation (13), which defines β without any f term; and the 'confirmation' of β−β_min = 0.52q^4.1 uses the same Csizmadia & Klagyivik model to generate both sides of the relation. These are abstract-level results, but they are not the only content of the paper, so the overall circularity is partial rather than total.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central ELMRCB classification depends mainly on the total-eclipse assumption and the photometric q reliability. All absolute parameters, ages, beta values, and instability estimates depend on a chain of empirical constants from prior papers (a-P relation, gyration radii, mass-loss parameters, beta model, main-sequence lifetime formula). No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (4)
  • a-P linear relation coefficients = a = 0.501 (+/- 0.063) + 5.621 (+/- 0.138) P (R_sun)
    Empirical calibration from Paper I (Li et al. 2022) used to compute semimajor axis and hence all absolute masses, radii, and ages of the six targets (Eq. 4).
  • exponential q-f fit coefficient = -3.86137 +/- 0.1762
    Fitted to the 218-system sample (Eq. 15); extrapolated to f=100% to obtain the claimed cutoff mass ratio q_min=0.021.
  • gyration radii k1^2, k2^2 = k1^2 from Arbutina & Wadhwa (2024) Eq. 15; k2^2=0.205
    Adopted to compute instability mass ratios q_min ~ 0.042-0.044 and J_spin/J_orb.
  • mass-loss parameters in initial mass equations = gamma=0.664, 2.50, 0.07, 0.64
    Used in Eq. 9 to derive initial masses and mass ratios; empirical constants from Yildiz & Doğan (2013).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption All six targets are in geometric contact and share a common equipotential surface (Lucy 1968), as modeled by the Wilson-Devinney code.
    Standard contact binary model; the paper assumes the W-D 2013 model applies without testing alternatives.
  • domain assumption Photometric mass ratios equal spectroscopic mass ratios for totally eclipsing contact binaries (Pribulla et al. 2003; Li et al. 2021a).
    This statistical equivalence is the basis for trusting the q values despite the absence of radial velocity measurements for all six targets.
  • domain assumption The flat-bottomed light curves at phase 0.5 indicate total eclipses, and no spot or third-light models are needed except one cool spot for J073647 SuperWASP data.
    The paper asserts total eclipse features; if the eclipses are partial, q and f from photometry are degenerate.
  • domain assumption Spectral subtraction using inactive template stars correctly isolates chromospheric emission; absence of emission lines implies absence of chromospheric activity.
    The STARMOD synthetic spectra assume the photospheric flux is well reproduced by the two template stars; template mismatch could hide weak emission.
  • ad hoc to paper The empirical a-P relation (Eq. 4) from Paper I holds for these ELMRCBs with P>0.5 d.
    The relation was fit to a sample of contact binaries, mostly shorter-period; applying it to the six targets without verifying distances or RVs propagates its scatter into all absolute parameters.
  • domain assumption The beta model of Csizmadia & Klagyivik (2004) (Eq. 13) correctly describes energy transfer, and the exponent 0.52 q^4.1 is valid.
    The central beta-f independence result is a direct consequence of this defining formula, which contains no contact-degree dependence.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Extremely Low Mass Ratio Contact Binaries. II. The First Photometric and Spectroscopic Investigations of Six Systems with Orbital Periods Longer than 0.5 days." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XDSS3ORK

@misc{pith2026250504029,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Extremely Low Mass Ratio Contact Binaries. II. The First Photometric and Spectroscopic Investigations of Six Systems with Orbital Periods Longer than 0.5 days},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XDSS3ORK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.04029}
}
abstract

The photometric and spectroscopic studies of six contact binaries were performed for the first time. The orbital periods of all the six targets are longer than 0.5d, and we discovered that their mass ratios are smaller than 0.15. So, they are extremely low mass-ratio contact binaries. Only one target is a W-subtype contact binary (ASASSN-V J105032.88+420829.0), while the others are A-subtype contact binaries. From orbital period analysis, ASASSN-V J075442.44+555623.2 shows no orbital period change. Three of the six targets demonstrate a secular period increase, and two targets for a secular period decrease. We investigated the LAMOST spectra employing the spectral subtraction method. All six contact binaries show no chromospheric emission line, implying no chromospheric activity. Their absolute parameters, initial masses, ages, energy transfer parameters, and instability parameters were calculated. The bolometric luminosity ratios ($(L_2/L_1)_{bol}$), the energy transfer parameters ($\beta$), the contact degrees ($f$), and the mass ratios ($q$) were collected for a sample of 218 contact binaries and we analyzed and discussed some correlations. The results by analyzing the relation between $\beta$, $f$ and $q$ indicate that the energy transfer parameter between the two components of extremely low mass-ratio contact binaries is independent of the contact degree. And the predicted cutoff mass ratio was estimated as 0.021 by analyzing the relation between $f$ and $q$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.04029 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Multi-band light curves of the six targets. The different colors represent observational data from different days, forming a complete light curve within one cycle in the phase diagram [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The relation between mass ratio 𝑞 and mean residual Σ of the six targets. as many eclipsing times as possible. The eclipsing times were derived directly based on the K-W method in the case of a continuous light curve (Kwee & van Woerden 1956). On the other hand, we employed the period shift method to calculate the minima for the discrete points of ASAS-SN, CRTS, and TESS with low cadence (Li et al. 2020, 2021b, 2022… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison between the photometric data and the theoretical light curves for TESS data. The different symbols represent the different bands. The lower panels show the residuals. be interpreted with caution, as the time span is not sufficiently long. The long-term variations presented in this paper may represent a part of a periodic variation on a longer timescale. Further observations will be required to confirm the… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison between the photometric data and the theoretical light curves for other telescopes. The different symbols represent the different bands. The bottom panels show the residuals [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The 𝑂 − 𝐶 diagrams of the six targets. E is the cycle number. The dashed lines in the top panels represents the fitting curves. The bottom panels displays the fitting residuals [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Spectral analysis of the six targets. The black lines represent the observed spectra of the six targets, the red lines represent the synthesized spectra produced by STARMOD, and the blue lines represent the subtracted spectra. All six targets exhibit no or only very we…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Diagrams to demonstrate the evolutionary state. In the two diagrams, the solid dots denote the primary components, while the hollow circles denote the secondary components. Colored dotted lines denote the evolutionary tracks for solar chemical compositions (Girardi et …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Diagrams to demonstrate the formation and stability of the six targets. In the first diagram, the boundary line (𝐽𝑙𝑖𝑚) and the detached binaries represented by black cross were taken from Eker et al. (2006). The solid and hollow black circles represent the contact bina…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Distributions of bolometric luminosity ratio (𝐿2/𝐿1 )𝑏𝑜𝑙, energy transfer parameter 𝛽, contact degree 𝑓 , mass ratio 𝑞, and orbital period 𝑃 for the collected targets. first time, including photometric, spectroscopic, and orbital period analysis. J073647, J094123, and …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

229 extracted references · 111 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...

  3. [3]

    O., Atanackovi \'c -Vukmanovi \'c O., Y lmaz M., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2004.09.002 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005NewA...10..163A 10, 163

    Albayrak B., Djura s evi \'c G., Selam S. O., Atanackovi \'c -Vukmanovi \'c O., Y lmaz M., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2004.09.002 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005NewA...10..163A 10, 163

  4. [4]

    W., 1973, Astrophysical quantities

    Allen C. W., 1973, Astrophysical quantities

  5. [5]

    B., Nelson R

    Alton K. B., Nelson R. H., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1693 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.479.3197A 479, 3197

  6. [6]

    B., Nelson R

    Alton K. B., Nelson R. H., Boyd D. R. S., 2018a, @doi [ ] 10.32023/0001-5237/68.2.5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AcA....68..159A 68, 159

  7. [7]

    B., Nelson R

    Alton K. B., Nelson R. H., Terrell D., 2018b, @doi [Information Bulletin on Variable Stars] 10.22444/IBVS.6256 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018IBVS.6256....1A 6256, 1

  8. [8]

    E., Sowell J

    Alvarez G. E., Sowell J. R., Williamon R. M., Lapasset E., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1086/682388 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015PASP..127..742A 127, 742

Show all 229 references
  1. [9]

    Arbutina B., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11723.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.377.1635A 377, 1635

  2. [10]

    Arbutina B., Wadhwa S., 2024, @doi [Serbian Astronomical Journal] 10.2298/SAJ2408001A , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024SerAJ.208....1A 208, 1

  3. [11]

    M., Kreiner J

    Baran A., Zola S., Rucinski S. M., Kreiner J. M., Siwak M., Drozdz M., 2004, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004AcA....54..195B 54, 195

  4. [12]

    C., 1984, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society

    Barden S. C., 1984, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. p. 893

  5. [13]

    C., 1985, @doi [ ] 10.1086/163361 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985ApJ...295..162B 295, 162

    Barden S. C., 1985, @doi [ ] 10.1086/163361 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985ApJ...295..162B 295, 162

  6. [15]

    Barone F., di Fiore L., Milano L., Russo G., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/172509 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...407..237B 407, 237

  7. [16]

    C., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019PASP..131a8002B 131, 018002

    Bellm E. C., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019PASP..131a8002B 131, 018002

  8. [17]

    Binnendijk L., 1970, @doi [Vistas in Astronomy] https://doi.org/10.1016/0083-6656(70)90041-3 , 12, 217

  9. [18]

    H., Guinan E

    Bradstreet D. H., Guinan E. F., 1994, in Shafter A. W., ed., Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 56, Interacting Binary Stars. p. 228

  10. [19]

    W., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201015655 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...520L..10B 520, L10

    Butters O. W., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201015655 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...520L..10B 520, L10

  11. [20]

    D., Torres G., Ribas I., R \' squez D., Montesinos B., Mas-Hesse J

    Caballero-Garc \' a M. D., Torres G., Ribas I., R \' squez D., Montesinos B., Mas-Hesse J. M., Domingo A., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200913602 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...514A..36C 514, A36

  12. [21]

    E., Sowell J

    Cabrera N. E., Sowell J. R., Williamon R. M., Collins T. F., Fekel F. C., Williamson M. H., Muterspaugh M. W., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1086/675408 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014PASP..126..121C 126, 121

  13. [22]

    J., Pribulla T., Grygar J., 2001, Contributions of the Astronomical Observatory Skalnate Pleso, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001CoSka..31....5C 31, 5

    Chochol D., van Houten C. J., Pribulla T., Grygar J., 2001, Contributions of the Astronomical Observatory Skalnate Pleso, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001CoSka..31....5C 31, 5

  14. [24]

    Christopoulou P.-E., Papageorgiou A., 2013b, @doi [The Astronomical Journal] 10.1088/0004-6256/146/6/157 , 146, 157

  15. [25]

    E., Parageorgiou A., Chrysopoulos I., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/142/4/99 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AJ....142...99C 142, 99

    Christopoulou P. E., Parageorgiou A., Chrysopoulos I., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/142/4/99 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AJ....142...99C 142, 99

  16. [26]

    E., Papageorgiou A., Vasileiadis T., Tsantilas S., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/144/5/149 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012AJ....144..149C 144, 149

    Christopoulou P. E., Papageorgiou A., Vasileiadis T., Tsantilas S., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/144/5/149 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012AJ....144..149C 144, 149

  17. [27]

    E., Catelan M., Drake A

    Christopoulou P.-E., Lalounta E., Papageorgiou A., Ferreira Lopes C. E., Catelan M., Drake A. J., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac534 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.512.1244C 512, 1244

  18. [28]

    L., Vink \'o J., Alfaro E

    Cs \'a k B., Kiss L. L., Vink \'o J., Alfaro E. J., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0002379 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&A...356..603C 356, 603

  19. [29]

    Cseki A., 2013, @doi [Serbian Astronomical Journal] 10.2298/SAJ130301003C , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013SerAJ.186...47C 186, 47

  20. [30]

    Csizmadia S., Klagyivik P., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20040430 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004A&A...426.1001C 426, 1001

  21. [31]

    Cui X.-Q., et al., 2012, @doi [Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1088/1674-4527/12/9/003 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012RAA....12.1197C 12, 1197

  22. [32]

    H., 1893, The Observatory, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1893Obs....16..172D 16, 172

    Darwin G. H., 1893, The Observatory, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1893Obs....16..172D 16, 172

  23. [34]

    P., Jagirdar R., Prasad R

    Devarapalli S. P., Jagirdar R., Prasad R. M., Thomas V. S., Ahmed S. A., Gralapally R., Das J. P., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa031 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.493.1565D 493, 1565

  24. [35]

    Djura s evi \'c G., Rovithis-Livaniou H., Rovithis P., Erkapi \'c S., Milovanovi \'c N., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20000493 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...367..840D 367, 840

  25. [36]

    Djura s evi \'c G., Y lmaz M., Ba s t \"u rk \"O ., K l c o g lu T., Latkovi \'c O., C al s kan S ., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014895 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...525A..66D 525, A66

  26. [37]

    Djura s evi \'c G., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/145/3/80 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013AJ....145...80D 145, 80

  27. [38]

    J., et al., 2009, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/870 , 696, 870

    Drake A. J., et al., 2009, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/870 , 696, 870

  28. [39]

    W., Rucinski S

    Duerbeck H. W., Rucinski S. M., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/509764 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007AJ....133..169D 133, 169

  29. [40]

    S., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1086/655938 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010PASP..122..935E 122, 935

    Eastman J., Siverd R., Gaudi B. S., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1086/655938 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010PASP..122..935E 122, 935

  30. [41]

    A., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv3013 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.457..836E 457, 836

    Eaton J. A., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv3013 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.457..836E 457, 836

  31. [42]

    P., 2012, @doi [Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences] 10.5140/JASS.2012.29.2.145 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012JASS...29..145E 29, 145

    Eggleton P. P., 2012, @doi [Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences] 10.5140/JASS.2012.29.2.145 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012JASS...29..145E 29, 145

  32. [44]

    Ekmek c i F., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2012.03.001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012NewA...17..603E 17, 603

  33. [45]

    Erdem A., \"O zkarde s B., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2006.09.002 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006NewA...12..192E 12, 192

  34. [46]

    Erdem A., \"O zkarde s B., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2008.10.001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009NewA...14..321E 14, 321

  35. [47]

    Erkan N., Ula s B., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2015.12.009 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016NewA...46...73E 46, 73

  36. [48]

    Gao X.-Y., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/ac99fd , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022PASP..134k4202G 134, 114202

  37. [49]

    Gazeas K., Niarchos P., 2005, Aerospace Research in Bulgaria, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ARBl...20..193G 20, 193

  38. [50]

    D., et al., 2005, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005AcA....55..123G 55, 123

    Gazeas K. D., et al., 2005, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005AcA....55..123G 55, 123

  39. [51]

    D., Niarchos P

    Gazeas K. D., Niarchos P. G., Zola S., Kreiner J. M., Rucinski S. M., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.0903.1364 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AcA....56..127G 56, 127

  40. [52]

    Girardi L., Bressan A., Bertelli G., Chiosi C., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1051/aas:2000126 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&AS..141..371G 141, 371

  41. [53]

    D., Duerbeck H

    Goecking K. D., Duerbeck H. W., Plewa T., Kaluzny J., Schertl D., Weigelt G., Flin P., 1994, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994A&A...289..827G 289, 827

  42. [54]

    M., Garcia-Melendo E., Guarro-Flo J., Nomen-Torres J., Vidal-Sainz J., 1999, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999IBVS.4702....1G 4702, 1

    Gomez-Forrellad J. M., Garcia-Melendo E., Guarro-Flo J., Nomen-Torres J., Vidal-Sainz J., 1999, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999IBVS.4702....1G 4702, 1

  43. [55]

    Y., 2016, @doi [Astrophysical Bulletin] 10.1134/S1990341316010077 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AstBu..71...64G 71, 64

    Gorda S. Y., 2016, @doi [Astrophysical Bulletin] 10.1134/S1990341316010077 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AstBu..71...64G 71, 64

  44. [56]

    F., Bradstreet D

    Guinan E. F., Bradstreet D. H., 1988, in Dupree A. K., Lago M. T. V. T., eds, NATO Advanced Study Institute (ASI) Series C Vol. 241, Formation and Evolution of Low Mass Stars. p. 345, @doi 10.1007/978-94-009-3037-7_23

  45. [57]

    Guo D.-F., et al., 2022, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stac2811 , 517, 1928

  46. [58]

    Guo D.-F., Li K., Liu F., Li H.-Z., Liu X.-Y., 2023, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stad417 , 521, 51

  47. [59]

    G \"u rol B., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2016.02.005 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016NewA...47...57G 47, 57

  48. [60]

    G \"u rol B., et al., 2011a, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2010.11.001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011NewA...16..242G 16, 242

  49. [61]

    u rol B., Terzio g lu Z., G \

    G \"u rol B., Terzio g lu Z., G \"u rsoytrak S. H., G \"o kay G., Derman E., 2011b, @doi [Astronomische Nachrichten] 10.1002/asna.201111563 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AN....332..690G 332, 690

  50. [62]

    H., Okan A., 2015a, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2014.10.007 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015NewA...36..100G 36, 100

    G \"u rol B., Bradstreet D. H., Okan A., 2015a, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2014.10.007 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015NewA...36..100G 36, 100

  51. [63]

    u rol B., G \

    G \"u rol B., G \"u rsoytrak S. H., Bradstreet D. H., 2015b, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2015.02.003 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015NewA...39....9G 39, 9

  52. [64]

    u rol B., Bradstreet D. H., Demircan Y., G \

    G \"u rol B., Bradstreet D. H., Demircan Y., G \"u rsoytrak S. H., 2015c, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2015.04.011 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015NewA...41...26G 41, 26

  53. [65]

    u rol B., G \

    G \"u rol B., G \"o kay G., Saral G., G \"u rsoytrak S. H., Cerit S., Terzio g lu Z., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2015.12.002 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016NewA...46...31G 46, 31

  54. [66]

    Hasanzadeh A., Farsian F., Nemati M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2014.07.013 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015NewA...34..262H 34, 262

  55. [67]

    J., Qian S

    He J. J., Qian S. B., Fern \'a ndez Laj \'u s E., Fari \ n a C., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/138/5/1465 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009AJ....138.1465H 138, 1465

  56. [68]

    He J.-J., Wang J.-J., Qian S.-B., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/64.4.85 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012PASJ...64...85H 64, 85

  57. [69]

    A., Templeton M., Terrell D., Smith T

    Henden A. A., Templeton M., Terrell D., Smith T. C., Levine S., Welch D., 2016, VizieR Online Data Catalog: AAVSO Photometric All Sky Survey (APASS) DR9 (Henden+, 2016) , VizieR On-line Data Catalog: II/336. Originally published in: 2015AAS...22533616H

  58. [70]

    W., 1981, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/196.2.305 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981MNRAS.196..305H 196, 305

    Hilditch R. W., 1981, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/196.2.305 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981MNRAS.196..305H 196, 305

  59. [71]

    W., 2001, An Introduction to Close Binary Stars

    Hilditch R. W., 2001, An Introduction to Close Binary Stars

  60. [72]

    W., King D

    Hilditch R. W., King D. J., 1986, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/223.3.581 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986MNRAS.223..581H 223, 581

  61. [73]

    A., Holmgren D., 1989, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989A&A...211...81H 211, 81

    Hill G., Fisher W. A., Holmgren D., 1989, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989A&A...211...81H 211, 81

  62. [74]

    J., Guinan E

    Hrivnak B. J., Guinan E. F., Lu W., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/176578 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...455..300H 455, 300

  63. [75]

    Hut P., 1980, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1980A&A....92..167H 92, 167

  64. [76]

    Jayasinghe T., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz844 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.486.1907J 486, 1907

  65. [77]

    F., 2009, Eclipsing Binary Stars: Modeling and Analysis , @doi 10.1007/978-1-4419-0699-1

    Kallrath J., Milone E. F., 2009, Eclipsing Binary Stars: Modeling and Analysis , @doi 10.1007/978-1-4419-0699-1

  66. [78]

    M., 1986, @doi [ ] 10.1086/114200 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986AJ.....92..666K 92, 666

    Kaluzny J., Rucinski S. M., 1986, @doi [ ] 10.1086/114200 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986AJ.....92..666K 92, 666

  67. [79]

    Y., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2020.101354 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020NewA...7801354K 78, 101354

    Kamalifar Z., Abedi A., Roobiat K. Y., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2020.101354 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020NewA...7801354K 78, 101354

  68. [80]

    W., Kim S.-L., Han W., Koch R

    Kim C.-H., Lee J. W., Kim S.-L., Han W., Koch R. H., 2003a, @doi [ ] 10.1086/344808 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003AJ....125..322K 125, 322

  69. [81]

    W., Kim H.-I., Kyung J.-M., Koch R

    Kim C.-H., Lee J. W., Kim H.-I., Kyung J.-M., Koch R. H., 2003b, @doi [ ] 10.1086/377321 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003AJ....126.1555K 126, 1555

  70. [82]

    435, Binaries - Key to Comprehension of the Universe

    Kjurkchieva D., Marchev D., 2010, in Pr s a A., Zejda M., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 435, Binaries - Key to Comprehension of the Universe. p. 111

  71. [83]

    P., Marchev D

    Kjurkchieva D. P., Marchev D. V., Popov V. A., 2018, @doi [Astronomische Nachrichten] 10.1002/asna.201813483 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AN....339..472K 339, 472

  72. [84]

    A., Marchev D., 2019a, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aaf868 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AJ....157...73K 157, 73

    Kjurkchieva D., Stateva I., Popov V. A., Marchev D., 2019a, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aaf868 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AJ....157...73K 157, 73

  73. [85]

    P., Popov V

    Kjurkchieva D. P., Popov V. A., Petrov N. I., 2019b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab4203 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AJ....158..186K 158, 186

  74. [86]

    A., Molnar L

    Kobulnicky H. A., Molnar L. A., Cook E. M., Henderson L. E., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac75bd , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJS..262...12K 262, 12

  75. [87]

    K \"o se O., Kalomeni B., Keskin V., Ula s B., Yakut K., 2011, @doi [Astronomische Nachrichten] 10.1002/asna.201011566 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AN....332..626K 332, 626

  76. [88]

    M., et al., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20031456 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003A&A...412..465K 412, 465

    Kreiner J. M., et al., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20031456 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003A&A...412..465K 412, 465

  77. [89]

    P., 1941, @doi [ ] 10.1086/144252 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1941ApJ....93..133K 93, 133

    Kuiper G. P., 1941, @doi [ ] 10.1086/144252 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1941ApJ....93..133K 93, 133

  78. [90]

    K., van Woerden H., 1956, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1956BAN....12..327K 12, 327

    Kwee K. K., van Woerden H., 1956, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1956BAN....12..327K 12, 327

  79. [91]

    Lapasset E., Gomez M., 1990, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990A&A...231..365L 231, 365

  80. [92]

    Latkovi \'c O., C eki A., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2024.102291 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024NewA..11302291L 113, 102291

  81. [93]

    Latkovi \'c O., C eki A., Lazarevi \'c S., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/abeb23 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJS..254...10L 254, 10

  82. [94]

    W., Park J.-H., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/aaa390 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PASP..130c4201L 130, 034201

    Lee J. W., Park J.-H., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/aaa390 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PASP..130c4201L 130, 034201

  83. [95]

    W., Lee C.-U., Kim S.-L., Kim H.-I., Park J.-H., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1086/658170 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011PASP..123...34L 123, 34

    Lee J. W., Lee C.-U., Kim S.-L., Kim H.-I., Park J.-H., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1086/658170 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011PASP..123...34L 123, 34

  84. [96]

    W., Park J.-H., Hong K., Kim S.-L., Lee C.-U., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/147/4/91 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014AJ....147...91L 147, 91

    Lee J. W., Park J.-H., Hong K., Kim S.-L., Lee C.-U., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/147/4/91 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014AJ....147...91L 147, 91

  85. [97]

    W., Youn J.-H., Park J.-H., Wolf M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/149/6/194 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015AJ....149..194L 149, 194

    Lee J. W., Youn J.-H., Park J.-H., Wolf M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/149/6/194 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015AJ....149..194L 149, 194

  86. [98]

    C., 1976, @doi [ ] 10.1086/130049 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976PASP...88..936L 88, 936

    Leung K. C., 1976, @doi [ ] 10.1086/130049 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976PASP...88..936L 88, 936

  87. [99]

    B., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2012.11.003 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013NewA...21...46L 21, 46

    Li K., Qian S. B., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2012.11.003 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013NewA...21...46L 21, 46

  88. [101]

    Li L., Zhang F., 2006b, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10462.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.369.2001L 369, 2001

  89. [102]

    M., Jiang Y

    Li K., Hu S. M., Jiang Y. G., Chen X., Ren D. Y., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2014.01.004 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014NewA...30...64L 30, 64

  90. [103]

    Li K., Hu S., Guo D., Jiang Y., Gao D., Chen X., 2015a, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2015.04.010 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015NewA...41...17L 41, 17

  91. [104]

    M., Guo D

    Li K., Hu S. M., Guo D. F., Jiang Y. G., Gao Y. G., Chen X., Odell A. P., 2015b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/149/4/120 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015AJ....149..120L 149, 120

  92. [105]

    Li H.-L., Wei J.-Y., Yang Y.-G., Dai H.-F., 2016a, @doi [Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1088/1674-4527/16/1/002 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016RAA....16....2L 16, 2

  93. [106]

    Y., Hu S

    Li K., Gao D. Y., Hu S. M., Guo D. F., Jiang Y. G., Chen X., 2016b, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s10509-016-2649-8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016Ap&SS.361...63L 361, 63

  94. [107]

    Li K., Kim C.-H., Xia Q.-Q., Michel R., Hu S.-M., Gao X., Guo D.-F., Chen X., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab7cda , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020AJ....159..189L 159, 189

  95. [108]

    Li K., et al., 2021a, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/abfc53 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....162...13L 162, 13

  96. [109]

    Li K., Xia Q.-Q., Kim C.-H., Hu S.-M., Guo D.-F., Jeong M.-J., Chen X., Gao D.-Y., 2021b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac242f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...922..122L 922, 122

  97. [110]

    Li K., Gao X., Liu X.-Y., Gao X., Li L.-Z., Chen X., Sun G.-Y., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ac8ff2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022AJ....164..202L 164, 202

  98. [111]

    Li K., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202451947 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...692L...4L 692, L4

  99. [112]

    Liu Q.-Y., Yang Y.-L., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1009-9271/3/2/142 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ChJAA...3..142L 3, 142

  100. [113]

    Liu Q., Yang Y., Gu C., Wang B., 1993, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993A&AS..101..253L 101, 253

  101. [114]

    L., Wang B., Naksata M., 1996, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996A&AS..118..453L 118, 453

    Liu Q., Soonthornthum B., Yang Y., Gu S., Niparugs S., Aniwat Sooksawat M. L., Wang B., Naksata M., 1996, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996A&AS..118..453L 118, 453

  102. [115]

    B., Zhu L

    Liu L., Qian S. B., Zhu L. Y., He J. J., Li L. J., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/141/5/147 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AJ....141..147L 141, 147

  103. [116]

    Liu L., Qian S.-B., He J.-J., Liao W.-P., Zhu L.-Y., Zhao E., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/64.3.48 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012PASJ...64...48L 64, 48

  104. [117]

    Liu J., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/ab247a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019PASP..131h4202L 131, 084202

  105. [118]

    Liu X.-Y., et al., 2023, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stad026 , 519, 5760

  106. [119]

    E., Hodgkin S

    Lohr M. E., Hodgkin S. T., Norton A. J., Kolb U. C., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321926 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...563A..34L 563, A34

  107. [120]

    E., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201525973 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...578A.103L 578, A103

    Lohr M. E., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201525973 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...578A.103L 578, A103

  108. [121]

    Lu W., 1991, @doi [ ] 10.1086/115872 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991AJ....102..262L 102, 262

  109. [122]

    X., Rucinski S

    Lu W. X., Rucinski S. M., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/116645 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993AJ....106..361L 106, 361

  110. [123]

    M., Og oza W., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/321131 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001AJ....122..402L 122, 402

    Lu W., Rucinski S. M., Og oza W., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/321131 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001AJ....122..402L 122, 402

  111. [124]

    J., Rush B

    Lu W., Hrivnak B. J., Rush B. W., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/509604 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007AJ....133..255L 133, 255

  112. [125]

    B., 1967, @doi [ ] 10.1086/110452 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1967AJ.....72Q.813L 72, 813

    Lucy L. B., 1967, @doi [ ] 10.1086/110452 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1967AJ.....72Q.813L 72, 813

  113. [126]

    B., 1968, @doi [ ] 10.1086/149510 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1968ApJ...151.1123L 151, 1123

    Lucy L. B., 1968, @doi [ ] 10.1086/149510 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1968ApJ...151.1123L 151, 1123

  114. [127]

    Q., Zhang X

    Luo C. Q., Zhang X. B., Deng L., Wang K., Luo Y., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/150/3/70 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015AJ....150...70L 150, 70

  115. [128]

    Luo X., Wang K., Zhang X., Deng L., Luo Y., Luo C., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aa8325 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....154...99L 154, 99

  116. [129]

    Maceroni C., Milano L., Russo G., 1984, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984A&AS...58..405M 58, 405

  117. [130]

    H., McIntosh D

    Maller A. H., McIntosh D. H., Katz N., Weinberg M. D., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/380388 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...598L...1M 598, L1

  118. [131]

    A., Saladyga M., 1999, in Philip A

    Mattei J. A., Saladyga M., 1999, in Philip A. G. D., van Altena W. F., Upgren A. R., eds, Anni Mirabiles. pp 59--64

  119. [132]

    J., Hilditch R

    McLean B. J., Hilditch R. W., 1983, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/203.1.1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983MNRAS.203....1M 203, 1

  120. [133]

    F., Groisman G., Fry D

    Milone E. F., Groisman G., Fry D. J. I., Bradstreet D. H., 1991, @doi [ ] 10.1086/169852 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991ApJ...370..677M 370, 677

  121. [134]

    Mitnyan T., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731402 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...612A..91M 612, A91

  122. [135]

    A., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6ba7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...840....1M 840, 1

    Molnar L. A., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6ba7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...840....1M 840, 1

  123. [136]

    A., Blain M

    Molnar L. A., Blain M. G., Cook E. M., Whitten S. M., Kobulnicky H., 2019, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts \#233. p. 448.05

  124. [137]

    H., 2010, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010IBVS.5951....1N 5951, 1

    Nelson R. H., 2010, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010IBVS.5951....1N 5951, 1

  125. [138]

    H., Alton K

    Nelson R. H., Alton K. B., 2019, @doi [Information Bulletin on Variable Stars] 10.22444/IBVS.6266 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019IBVS.6266....1N 6266, 1

  126. [139]

    H., Robb R

    Nelson R. H., Robb R. M., 2015, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015IBVS.6134....1N 6134, 1

  127. [140]

    H., S enavci H

    Nelson R. H., S enavci H. V., Ba s t \"u rk \"O ., Bahar E., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2013.11.006 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014NewA...29...57N 29, 57

  128. [141]

    G., 1978, @doi [ ] 10.1007/BF00644518 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978Ap&SS..58..301N 58, 301

    Niarchos P. G., 1978, @doi [ ] 10.1007/BF00644518 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978Ap&SS..58..301N 58, 301

  129. [142]

    G., Hoffmann M., Duerbeck H

    Niarchos P. G., Hoffmann M., Duerbeck H. W., 1994, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994A&AS..103...39N 103, 39

  130. [143]

    O'Connell D. J. K., 1951, Publications of the Riverview College Observatory, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1951PRCO....2...85O 2, 85

  131. [144]

    D., Kim C

    Oh K. D., Kim C. H., Kim H. I., Lee W. B., 2007, in Kang Y. W., Lee H. W., Leung K. C., Cheng K. S., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 362, The Seventh Pacific Rim Conference on Stellar Astrophysics. p. 82

  132. [145]

    Oh K.-D., Kim H.-I., Sung E.-C., 2010, @doi [Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences] 10.5140/JASS.2010.27.2.069 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010JASS...27...69O 27, 69

  133. [146]

    Ostadnezhad S., Delband M., Hasanzadeh A., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2014.02.001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014NewA...31...14O 31, 14

  134. [147]

    \"O zdemir S., Demircan O., Erdem A., C i c ek C., Bulut \.I ., Soydugan E., Soydugan F., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20020367 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002A&A...387..240O 387, 240

  135. [148]

    \"O zkarde s B., Erdem A., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2011.07.002 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012NewA...17..143O 17, 143

  136. [149]

    \"O zkarde s B., Erdem A., Bak s V., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2009.01.003 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009NewA...14..461O 14, 461

  137. [150]

    E., Pribulla T., Va n ko M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s10509-015-2318-3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015Ap&SS.357...59P 357, 59

    Papageorgiou A., Christopoulou P. E., Pribulla T., Va n ko M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s10509-015-2318-3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015Ap&SS.357...59P 357, 59

  138. [151]

    W., Kim S.-L., Lee C.-U., Jeon Y.-B., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/65.1.1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASJ...65....1P 65, 1

    Park J.-H., Lee J. W., Kim S.-L., Lee C.-U., Jeon Y.-B., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/65.1.1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASJ...65....1P 65, 1

  139. [152]

    V., Evans A., Banerjee D

    Pavlenko Y. V., Evans A., Banerjee D. P. K., Southworth J., Shahbandeh M., Davis S., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201832717 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...615A.120P 615, A120

  140. [153]

    J., Mamajek E

    Pecaut M. J., Mamajek E. E., 2013, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/9 , 208, 9

  141. [154]

    L., Wang D.-m., Lu H.-p., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aa9438 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....154..260P 154, 260

    Pi Q.-f., Zhang L.-y., Bi S.-l., Han X. L., Wang D.-m., Lu H.-p., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aa9438 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....154..260P 154, 260

  142. [155]

    Pribulla T., Chochol D., Vanko M., Parimucha S., 2002, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002IBVS.5258....1P 5258, 1

  143. [156]

    M., Tremko J., 2003, Contributions of the Astronomical Observatory Skalnate Pleso, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003CoSka..33...38P 33, 38

    Pribulla T., Kreiner J. M., Tremko J., 2003, Contributions of the Astronomical Observatory Skalnate Pleso, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003CoSka..33...38P 33, 38

  144. [157]

    M., Conidis G., DeBond H., Thomson J

    Pribulla T., Rucinski S. M., Conidis G., DeBond H., Thomson J. R., Gazeas K., Og oza W., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/512772 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007AJ....133.1977P 133, 1977

  145. [158]

    Pribulla T., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/137/3/3655 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009AJ....137.3655P 137, 3655

  146. [159]

    Pribulla T., Va n ko M., Chochol D., Hamb \'a lek L ., Parimucha S ., 2011, @doi [Astronomische Nachrichten] 10.1002/asna.201111569 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AN....332..607P 332, 607

  147. [160]

    Pych W., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/382105 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004AJ....127.1712P 127, 1712

  148. [161]

    B., Yang Y

    Qian S. B., Yang Y. G., Soonthornthum B., Zhu L. Y., He J. J., Yuan J. Z., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/430673 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005AJ....130..224Q 130, 224

  149. [162]

    Qian S., Yang Y., Zhu L., He J., Yuan J., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s10509-006-9114-z , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006Ap&SS.304...25Q 304, 25

  150. [163]

    B., Yuan J

    Qian S. B., Yuan J. Z., Xiang F. Y., Soonthornthum B., Zhu L. Y., He J. J., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/521927 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007AJ....134.1769Q 134, 1769

  151. [164]

    B., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/798/2/L42 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...798L..42Q 798, L42

    Qian S. B., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/798/2/L42 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...798L..42Q 798, L42

  152. [165]

    A., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/187855 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...444L..41R 444, L41

    Rasio F. A., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/187855 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...444L..41R 444, L41

  153. [166]

    R., et al., 2014, in Oschmann Jr

    Ricker G. R., et al., 2014, in Oschmann Jr. J. M., Clampin M., Fazio G. G., MacEwen H. A., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 9143, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2014: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave. p. 914320 (...

  154. [167]

    Rodr \' guez E., et al., 1998, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998A&A...336..920R 336, 920

  155. [168]

    M., 1993, in Sahade J., McCluskey G

    Rucinski S. M., 1993, in Sahade J., McCluskey G. E., Kondo Y., eds, Astrophysics and Space Science Library Vol. 177, Astrophysics and Space Science Library. p. 111, @doi 10.1007/978-94-011-2416-4_8

  156. [169]

    M., 2001, @doi [The Astronomical Journal] 10.1086/321153 , 122, 1007

    Rucinski S. M., 2001, @doi [The Astronomical Journal] 10.1086/321153 , 122, 1007

  157. [170]

    M., Lu W., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/301101 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999AJ....118.2451R 118, 2451

    Rucinski S. M., Lu W., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/301101 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999AJ....118.2451R 118, 2451

  158. [171]

    M., Lu W., Mochnacki S

    Rucinski S. M., Lu W., Mochnacki S. W., Og oza W., Stachowski G., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/323106 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001AJ....122.1974R 122, 1974

  159. [172]

    M., Lu W., Capobianco C

    Rucinski S. M., Lu W., Capobianco C. C., Mochnacki S. W., Blake R. M., Thomson J. R., Og oza W., Stachowski G., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/342341 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002AJ....124.1738R 124, 1738

  160. [173]

    M., et al., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/374949 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003AJ....125.3258R 125, 3258

    Rucinski S. M., et al., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/374949 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003AJ....125.3258R 125, 3258

  161. [174]

    M., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/136/2/586 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AJ....136..586R 136, 586

    Rucinski S. M., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/136/2/586 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AJ....136..586R 136, 586

  162. [175]

    G., Faulkner D

    Samec R. G., Faulkner D. R., Williams D. B., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/426357 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004AJ....128.2997S 128, 2997

  163. [176]

    Sarotsakulchai T., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aadcfa , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....156..199S 156, 199

  164. [177]

    Sarotsakulchai T., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/psy149 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019PASJ...71...34S 71, 34

  165. [178]

    V., \"O zavci \.I ., C etinta s C., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s10509-005-4837-9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005Ap&SS.296..305S 296, 305

    Selam S., Albayrak B., Yilmaz M., S enavci H. V., \"O zavci \.I ., C etinta s C., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s10509-005-4837-9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005Ap&SS.296..305S 296, 305

  166. [179]

    o r \"u ko g lu O., Y lmaz M., Ba s t \

    Selam S. O., Esmer E. M., S enavc H. V., Bahar E., Y \"o r \"u ko g lu O., Y lmaz M., Ba s t \"u rk \"O ., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s10509-018-3252-y , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018Ap&SS.363...34S 363, 34

  167. [180]

    J., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/48 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...788...48S 788, 48

    Shappee B. J., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/48 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...788...48S 788, 48

  168. [181]

    Siwak M., Zola S., Koziel-Wierzbowska D., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.1011.5682 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AcA....60..305S 60, 305

  169. [182]

    F., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/498708 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....131.1163S 131, 1163

    Skrutskie M. F., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/498708 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....131.1163S 131, 1163

  170. [183]

    G., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s00159-009-0020-6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&ARv..17..251S 17, 251

    Strassmeier K. G., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s00159-009-0020-6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&ARv..17..251S 17, 251

  171. [184]

    L., M \'e sz \'a ros S., Vink \'o J., Csizmadia S., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20066768 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...465..943S 465, 943

    Szalai T., Kiss L. L., M \'e sz \'a ros S., Vink \'o J., Csizmadia S., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20066768 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...465..943S 465, 943

  172. [185]

    Tian X.-M., Zhu L.-Y., Qian S.-B., Li L.-J., Jiang L.-Q., 2018, @doi [Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1088/1674-4527/18/2/20 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018RAA....18...20T 18, 020

  173. [186]

    Ula s B., Ulusoy C., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2014.02.009 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014NewA...31...56U 31, 56

  174. [187]

    Ula s B., Kalomeni B., Keskin V., K \"o se O., Yakut K., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2011.06.002 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012NewA...17...46U 17, 46

  175. [188]

    S., De Horta A., Filipovi \'c M

    Wadhwa S. S., De Horta A., Filipovi \'c M. D., Tothill N. F. H., Arbutina B., Petrovi \'c J., Djura s evi \'c G., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3637 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.501..229W 501, 229

  176. [189]

    S., Landin N

    Wadhwa S. S., Landin N. R., Arbutina B., Tothill N. F. H., De Horta A. Y., Filipovi \'c M. D., Petrovi \'c J., Djura s evi \'c G., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2511 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.535.2494W 535, 2494

  177. [190]

    arXiv:2412.00377

    Wang J.-Y., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2412.00377 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv241200377W p. arXiv:2412.00377

  178. [191]

    F., 1976, @doi [ ] 10.1086/154781 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976ApJ...209..829W 209, 829

    Webbink R. F., 1976, @doi [ ] 10.1086/154781 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976ApJ...209..829W 209, 829

  179. [192]

    E., 1979, @doi [ ] 10.1086/157588 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979ApJ...234.1054W 234, 1054

    Wilson R. E., 1979, @doi [ ] 10.1086/157588 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979ApJ...234.1054W 234, 1054

  180. [193]

    E., 1994, @doi [Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific] 10.1086/133464 , 106, 921

    Wilson R. E., 1994, @doi [Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific] 10.1086/133464 , 106, 921

  181. [194]

    E., Devinney E

    Wilson R. E., Devinney E. J., 1971, @doi [ ] 10.1086/150986 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1971ApJ...166..605W 166, 605

  182. [195]

    Wolf M., Mol \' k P., Hornoch K., S arounov \'a L., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1051/aas:2000300 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&AS..147..243W 147, 243

  183. [196]

    Xiang F.-Y., Yu Y.-X., Xiao T.-Y., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/149/2/62 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015AJ....149...62X 149, 62

  184. [197]

    Xiao Z., Shengbang Q., Binghe H., Hao L., Jia Z., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/psw094 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016PASJ...68..102X 68, 102

  185. [198]

    Yakut K., Kalomeni B., \.I bano g lu C., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20031773 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004A&A...417..725Y 417, 725

  186. [199]

    Yamasaki A., Jugaku J., Seki M., 1988, @doi [ ] 10.1086/114687 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988AJ.....95..894Y 95, 894

  187. [200]

    Yang Y.-G., 2012, @doi [Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1088/1674-4527/12/4/006 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012RAA....12..419Y 12, 419

  188. [201]

    Yang Y., Liu Q., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1051/aas:1999204 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999A&AS..136..139Y 136, 139

  189. [202]

    Yang Y., Liu Q., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/377019 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003AJ....126.1960Y 126, 1960

  190. [204]

    Yang Y.-G., Qian S.-B., 2015b, @doi [The Astronomical Journal] 10.1088/0004-6256/150/3/69 , 150, 69

  191. [205]

    G., Qian S

    Yang Y. G., Qian S. B., Zhu C. H., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/424003 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004PASP..116..826Y 116, 826

  192. [206]

    Yang Y.-G., Qian S.-B., Zhu L.-Y., He J.-J., Yuan J.-Z., 2005a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/57.6.983 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005PASJ...57..983Y 57, 983

  193. [207]

    G., Qian S

    Yang Y. G., Qian S. B., Zhu L. Y., 2005b, @doi [ ] 10.1086/496880 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005AJ....130.2252Y 130, 2252

  194. [208]

    G., Qian S

    Yang Y. G., Qian S. B., Zhu L. Y., He J. J., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/138/2/540 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009AJ....138..540Y 138, 540

  195. [209]

    G., Wei J

    Yang Y. G., Wei J. Y., Li H. L., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2009.07.009 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010NewA...15..155Y 15, 155

  196. [210]

    G., Qian S

    Yang Y. G., Qian S. B., Zhang L. Y., Dai H. F., Soonthornthum B., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/146/2/35 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013AJ....146...35Y 146, 35

  197. [211]

    F., Ali c avu s F., Soydugan F., 2019, @doi [Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1088/1674-4527/19/1/10 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019RAA....19...10Y 19, 010

    Yildirim M. F., Ali c avu s F., Soydugan F., 2019, @doi [Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1088/1674-4527/19/1/10 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019RAA....19...10Y 19, 010

  198. [212]

    Y ld z M., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1874 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.437..185Y 437, 185

  199. [213]

    Yildiz M., Doğan T., 2013, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stt028 , 430, 2029

  200. [214]

    u rk \"O ., \

    Y lmaz M., Ba s t \"u rk \"O ., \"O zavc \.I ., S enavc H. V., Selam S. O., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2014.08.001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015NewA...34..271Y 34, 271

  201. [215]

    Yuan J.-Z., 2011, @doi [Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1088/1674-4527/11/10/004 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011RAA....11.1158Y 11, 1158

  202. [216]

    L., Lu H.-P., Long L., Yan Y., 2019, @doi [Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1088/1674-4527/19/7/97 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019RAA....19...97Y 19, 097

    Yue Q., Zhang L.-Y., Han X.-M. L., Lu H.-P., Long L., Yan Y., 2019, @doi [Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1088/1674-4527/19/7/97 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019RAA....19...97Y 19, 097

  203. [217]

    B., Zhang R

    Zhang X. B., Zhang R. X., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07200.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.347..307Z 347, 307

  204. [218]

    Zhang J., Qian S.-B., Han Z.-T., Wu Y., 2016, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stw3153 , 466, 1118

  205. [219]

    Zhang B., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac0834 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJS..256...14Z 256, 14

  206. [220]

    Zheng S.-Y., Li K., Xia Q.-Q., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1829 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.506.4251Z 506, 4251

  207. [221]

    Zhou D.-Q., Leung K.-C., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1086/168760 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990ApJ...355..271Z 355, 271

  208. [222]

    Zhou X., Qian S., He J., Zhang J., Jiag L., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/psv067 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015PASJ...67...98Z 67, 98

  209. [223]

    B., Zhang J., Zhang B., Kreiner J., 2016a, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-6256/151/3/67 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AJ....151...67Z 151, 67

    Zhou X., Qian S. B., Zhang J., Zhang B., Kreiner J., 2016a, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-6256/151/3/67 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AJ....151...67Z 151, 67

  210. [224]

    B., Zhang J., Jiang L

    Zhou X., Qian S. B., Zhang J., Jiang L. Q., Zhang B., Kreiner J., 2016b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/817/2/133 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...817..133Z 817, 133

  211. [225]

    Zhou X., Qian S.-B., Zhang J., Li L.-J., Wang Q.-S., 2016c, @doi [Advances in Astronomy] 10.1155/2016/7468976 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AdAst2016E...7Z 2016, 746897

  212. [226]

    Y., Qian S

    Zhu L. Y., Qian S. B., Liu N. P., Liu L., Jiang L. Q., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/145/2/39 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013AJ....145...39Z 145, 39

  213. [227]

    Zola S., et al., 2004, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004AcA....54..299Z 54, 299

  214. [228]

    Zola S., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.0903.1365 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005AcA....55..389Z 55, 389

  215. [229]

    M., Ogloza W., Siwak M., Koziel-Wierzbowska D., Winiarski M., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17129.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.408..464Z 408, 464

    Zola S., Gazeas K., Kreiner J. M., Ogloza W., Siwak M., Koziel-Wierzbowska D., Winiarski M., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17129.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.408..464Z 408, 464

  216. [230]

    H., S enavc H

    Zola S., Nelson R. H., S enavc H. V., Szymanski T., Ku \'z micz A., Winiarski M., Jableka D., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2012.04.004 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012NewA...17..673Z 17, 673

  217. [231]

    M., Pr s a A., Milone E

    Zwitter T., Munari U., Marrese P. M., Pr s a A., Milone E. F., Boschi F., Tomov T., Siviero A., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20030446 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003A&A...404..333Z 404, 333

  218. [232]

    C al s kan S ., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/148/6/126 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014AJ....148..126C 148, 126

  219. [233]

    C i c ek C., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2010.06.005 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011NewA...16...12C 16, 12

  220. [234]

    V., Nelson R

    S enavc H. V., Nelson R. H., \"O zavc \.I ., Selam S. O., Albayrak B., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2008.01.001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008NewA...13..468S 13, 468

  221. [235]

    V., Do g ruel M

    S enavc H. V., Do g ruel M. B., Nelson R. H., Y lmaz M., Selam S. O., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2016.39 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016PASA...33...43S 33, e043

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.