Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Electromagnetic response and emergent topological orders in transition metal dichalcogenide MoTe$_2$ bilayers

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Twisted bilayer MoTe2 is predicted to host both Jain-sequence and non-Jain 'fractal' fractional Chern insulators, with electric fields tuning topological transitions between them.

desk verdict Solid Hofstadter map of t-MoTe2 that is worth having on the shelf; the fractal FCI predictions are interesting but rest on a uniform-flux approximation the authors themselves flag as potentially biased. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.04685 v2 pith:VA6FV2UM submitted 2025-05-07 cond-mat.str-el

Tianhong Lu , Yi-Ming Wu , Luiz H. Santos This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords twistedbilayerMoTe2fractionalCherninsulatorHofstadterspectrumcompositefermionChern-SimonsfluxattachmenttopologicalquantumphasetransitionspinHallstatemoiréflatbands
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Twisted bilayer MoTe2, in two twist-angle regimes already used in experiments, is predicted to host two distinct families of fractional Chern insulators (FCIs) when holes partially fill its moiré bands. The paper computes the Hofstadter spectrum of the continuum model with moiré potentials up to second harmonics and reinterprets these fractal bands as composite-fermion bands under a uniform Chern-Simons flux attachment of two flux quanta per hole. It finds the familiar Jain-sequence FCIs at fillings such as 1/3 and 2/5 alongside non-Jain 'fractal' FCIs at fillings 1/5, 2/9, and 4/5, the latter carrying higher Chern numbers and smaller gaps. A perpendicular electric field is predicted to suppress the composite-fermion gaps and, in the 4/5 state, to switch the Hall conductance between quantized values at specific displacement fields. If correct, these are concrete and tunable predictions for transport experiments in dual-gated t-MoTe2.

What carries the argument

The central object is the moiré Hofstadter spectrum: the t-MoTe2 continuum Hamiltonian, with intralayer moiré potentials and interlayer tunneling kept through second harmonics, is placed in a perpendicular magnetic field via minimal coupling in a Landau-level basis, and in a perpendicular electric field via a layer-potential difference ±ud/2. The argument then switches to the composite-fermion picture by attaching two Chern-Simons flux quanta to each hole and replacing the statistical flux b(r) = 2φ0ρ(r) with a uniform mean-field value bbar = 2φ0ρbar. In that uniform ansatz the composite-fermion problem is the same Hofstadter problem at flux φ/φ0 = p/q, with hole filling per valley ν = p/(2q), so filling p/2 composite-fermion bands produces incompressible states whose Hall conductance is fixed by the Chern numbers of those bands. It is the Chern number of the filled composite-fermion bands — ±1 for the Jain states, 2 or 3 for the fractal FCIs — that separates the two families and determines the fractional Hall plateaus.

What would settle it

A dual-gated transport experiment at fixed hole filling ν = 4/5, sweeping displacement field at θ ≈ 2.1°, should observe the Hall conductance switch from (3/5)e²/h to (2/5)e²/h near ud ≈ 4 meV and back near ud ≈ 14 meV; at θ ≈ 3.89° it should observe one such switch. If no quantized plateaus or no electric-field-driven transition appear near these fields, the fractal-FCI prediction is wrong, and if no 1/3 plateau appears despite a computed composite-fermion gap, the uniform-flux approximation is the likely culprit.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Under a uniform mean-field Chern-Simons flux attachment, the moiré Hofstadter spectrum of t-MoTe2 is read as a spectrum of composite fermions, and filled composite-fermion bands at hole filling ν = p/(2q) yield incompressible states with quantized Hall conductance. The central finding is that the spectrum supports two classes of FCIs: robust Jain states at ν = 1/3, 2/5, 3/5, 2/3, whose filled composite-fermion bands resemble Landau levels with Chern number ±1 and large gaps, and non-Jain 'fractal' FCIs at ν = 1/5, 2/9, 4/5, whose filled bands have Chern numbers 2 or 3 and whose Hall conductances are predicted to be (2/5), (4/9), and (3/5) e²/h. The electric field weakens interlayer tunneling and shrinks all composite-fermion gaps; the Jain states stay gapped up to the field where the first moiré band becomes trivial (ud ≈ 17 meV at 2.1°, ud ≈ 19.5 meV at 3.89°), while the fractal FCIs undergo topological quantum phase transitions. At ν = 4/5 this happens twice at θ ≈ 2.1° (near ud ≈ 4 meV and ud ≈ 14 meV) and once at θ ≈ 3.89°, each transition exchanging Chern number ΔC = ±5 through five Dirac-cone touchings. Applying opposite flux attachments to the two valleys gives a series of fractional quantum spin Hall states.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on replacing the local statistical flux b(r) = 2φ0ρ(r) by a uniform mean-field value bbar; the paper itself warns in Sections IV and V that this ansatz is biased toward liquid-like FCI states and may underestimate competing orders such as charge-density waves or trivial correlated insulators, and it notes that the predicted 1/3 FCI has not been seen experimentally, where a trivial insulator appears instead.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Dual-gated t-MoTe2 should show Jain-sequence FCI plateaus at ν = 1/3, 2/5, 3/5, 2/3 in the first moiré band, with thermal gaps set by the computed composite-fermion bandwidths; the paper's calculated gaps for 2/3 and 3/5 at θ = 3.89° (1.3 meV and 2.1 meV) match the experimentally reported activation scales.
  • Fractal FCIs at ν = 1/5, 2/9, and 4/5 should appear as fractional Hall plateaus with σxy = (2/5), (4/9), and (3/5) e²/h, but with smaller gaps than the Jain states, so they will be most visible at low temperature and low disorder.
  • Sweeping the displacement field at ν = 4/5 should produce two Hall-conductance switches at θ ≈ 2.1° (ud ≈ 4 meV and ud ≈ 14 meV) and one at θ ≈ 3.89°, each passing through a multi-Dirac-cone critical point with ΔC = ±5.
  • At sufficiently large displacement field (ud ≈ 17 meV at 2.1°, ud ≈ 19.5 meV at 3.89°) the first moiré band becomes topologically trivial, so all FCI physics in that band should disappear.
  • Valley-contrasting flux attachment yields time-reversal-invariant fractional quantum spin Hall states, whose stability depends on intervalley interactions that the paper identifies as a source of time-reversal breaking.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the uniform-flux ansatz is biased toward liquid FCI states, the smaller-gap fractal states at 1/5 and 2/9 are the most likely to be replaced in reality by charge-density-wave or trivial correlated insulators; measuring local compressibility or nonlinear transport at exactly those fillings would test this.
  • The paper's p/(4p+1) filling sequence (1/5, 2/9, ...) suggests a whole ladder of fractal FCIs with Dirac-cone multiplicities 4p+1; the next member, 3/13, is an explicit testable extension not computed in the paper.
  • The predicted Chern-number exchange ΔC = ±5 through five Dirac cones at ν = 4/5 is a natural place to search for multi-flavor QED3 criticality, though the paper does not derive the critical field theory.
  • The same Hofstadter-to-composite-fermion machinery applied to the second moiré band predicts fragile topological orders there; this is consistent with experiments seeing FCIs only in the first band, and suggests device-quality comparisons should focus on the first band.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies twisted bilayer MoTe2 in two twist-angle regimes, θ≈2.1° (multiple same-Chern bands per valley) and θ≈3.89° (Haldane-like opposite-Chern bands), using a continuum model with moiré potentials up to second harmonics. It computes Hofstadter spectra as functions of perpendicular magnetic flux and displacement field, and then interprets those spectra within a composite-fermion mean-field theory in which two Chern-Simons flux quanta are attached per particle and the statistical flux is approximated as uniform. On this basis it identifies Jain-sequence fractional Chern insulators and non-Jain 'fractal' FCIs at ν=4/5, 2/9, and 1/5, with Hall conductances 3/5, 4/9, and 2/5 in units of e²/h, and it predicts electric-field-induced topological quantum phase transitions at those fillings. The paper also sketches a valley-contrasting flux-attachment extension aimed at fractional quantum spin Hall states. The main new predictions are the fractal FCIs and their electric-field-tuned transitions, while the Jain-state results are presented as consistent with existing experiments.

Significance. If the fractal FCI predictions are correct, they are concrete and falsifiable: specific Hall conductances at specific fillings, and electric-field-tuned Chern-number-changing transitions at estimated displacement fields (e.g., ud≈4 and ≈14 meV for ν=4/5 at θ≈2.1°). The noninteracting Hofstadter calculation is internally consistent, the continuum-model implementation with second harmonics is a technical improvement over earlier work, and the computed Jain-state gaps at θ≈3.89° (1.3 meV at ν=2/3 and 2.1 meV at ν=3/5) match the measured activation-energy scales reasonably well. The paper is also unusually transparent about the limitations of its uniform-flux ansatz. However, the most novel claims—fractal FCIs and their quantum phase transitions—rest entirely on that ansatz, and the paper's own Section V concedes that the ansatz may underestimate competing orders. These strengths justify serious consideration, but the load-bearing approximation needs additional support before the fractal-state predictions can be regarded as established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. IV and Sec. V] The central predictions rest on replacing the local Chern-Simons flux b(r)=sφ0ρ(r) with a uniform mean-field value b̄. Section IV argues that the uniform ansatz 'remains a valid starting point' when the topological order is robust, but Section V explicitly concedes that this ansatz 'is biased towards liquid-like FCI states and thus may underestimate the role played by other electronic orders.' The fractal FCIs at ν=4/5, 2/9, and 1/5 are precisely the cases with smaller composite-fermion gaps and more dispersive higher-Chern bands, so the acknowledged limitation applies to the paper's most novel predictions. Please either provide a self-consistent treatment of a spatially varying b(r), perform an exact-diagonalization check for the indicated fillings, or at least quantify how large density-modulation-induced corrections to the composite-fermion gaps in Figs. 7–10 would need to be to close those gaps. Without one of these checks, the fractal FCI and quantum-phase-transition predictions remain unvalidated beyond the uniform ansatz.
  2. [Sec. IV, Eq. (18), and Fig. 5] The application of Eq. (18) to the ν=4/5 example is not reproducible from the text. The text states that each filled fractal composite-fermion band carries Chern number C=2 or 3, but the reported σxy=3/5 at ν=4/5 requires a total filled-band Chern number C=-3 under Eq. (18), or else a different aggregation rule that is not stated. Please specify the Chern numbers of the four filled composite-fermion bands for this state, including signs and the ordering for ν>1/2, and state explicitly how Eq. (18) is to be applied when multiple bands are filled. As written, the reader cannot verify the headline quantum numbers for one of the three central examples.
  3. [Sec. III and Sec. IV] The relationship between the external magnetic flux φ of Sec. III and the Chern-Simons flux b of Sec. IV needs to be stated explicitly. Eq. (16) identifies φ with bAuc, but Eq. (4) is written for an external magnetic field. If the FCI predictions are for B_ext=0 with only the Chern-Simons flux present, this should be stated plainly; if finite B_ext is intended, the composite fermions see B_ext-b, and Eq. (16) would need to be modified accordingly. The current presentation conflates the two settings and makes it difficult to determine whether the predicted FCIs are zero-field states or finite-field states.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Appendix B] There is a typo: 'Femi surface' should read 'Fermi surface.'
  2. [Sec. IV] There is a typo: 'redidual interaction' should read 'residual interaction.'
  3. [Fig. 4 caption] The caption contains an unmatched parenthesis/bracket at the end: '[near (d)[.' should be cleaned up.
  4. [Sec. III A] The Zeeman discussion estimates valley polarization at fluxes near φ0, but the composite-fermion analysis is aimed at zero external field; a sentence clarifying the role of Zeeman for the zero-field FCI predictions would help the reader.
  5. [Eq. (18)] The symbol C in Eq. (18) should be defined as the total Chern number of the filled composite-fermion bands, since the text also uses C to denote individual band Chern numbers (C=2 or 3) in the same paragraph.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the uniform-CS-flux approximation is a stated modeling assumption, and the novel fractal FCI/QPT predictions are independent outputs of the Hofstadter calculation.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained and does not reduce to its inputs by construction. The continuum Hamiltonian (Sec. II) is diagonalized in a Landau-level basis (Sec. III), and the composite-fermion mapping is derived from the flux-attachment constraint in Appendix B, yielding the relations nu = p/(2q) and nu_CF = p/2; these are not fitted parameters but consequences of the chosen s = 2 flux attachment. The Jain-state results are presented as validation against measured activation gaps in Sec. V, not as new predictions, and they are not claimed as the paper's novel output. The fractal-FCI fillings (4/5, 2/9, 1/5), the higher Chern numbers C = 2 or 3, and the electric-field-induced topological quantum phase transitions are read off from the computed Hofstadter gap structure and Chern numbers; nothing in the input fixes these specific fillings or Chern numbers in advance. The paper explicitly acknowledges in Sec. V that the uniform-b ansatz is "biased towards liquid-like FCI states" and may underestimate competing orders, and that a self-consistent treatment of b(r) is future work; this is an honest correctness caveat, not a circular reduction. Citations to the authors' prior work (Refs. [24], [39], [68]) support but do not exclusively carry the composite-fermion formalism, which is also grounded in standard CF references (Refs. [40], [41], [65]-[67]) and re-derived in the appendices. The central novel predictions therefore have independent content beyond the assumptions used to set up the calculation.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Central claims rest on the continuum model with parameters from prior DFT fits, the uniform Chern-Simons flux ansatz, and the assumption that single-particle composite fermion gaps survive interactions. The most fragile input is the uniform b approximation; the paper's own discussion acknowledges it may miss CDW order. No new free parameters are fitted in this paper beyond adopting prior model parameters.

free parameters (2)
  • Continuum model parameters (a0, m*, V, psi, w, V2, w2) = Two DFT-fit sets: (0.3472 nm, 0.62 me, 20.51 meV, -61.49 deg, -7.01 meV, -9.08 meV, 11.08 meV) at 2.1 deg; (0.355 nm…
    Adopted from Ref. [6]; all band topology and Hofstadter gaps depend on these inputs.
  • s, number of Chern-Simons flux quanta attached per particle = 2
    Chosen to reproduce the Jain sequence and motivated by observed FCI hierarchy in t-MoTe2; all composite fermion fillings and Hall conductivities follow from this choice.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Continuum model with first and second harmonic moiré potentials and tunneling accurately describes low-energy valence bands of t-MoTe2.
    Used throughout Secs. II and III; parameters from DFT fits in Ref. [6].
  • domain assumption DFT-fitted parameter values remain valid when a strong magnetic field is applied.
    The Hofstadter calculation uses zero-field continuum parameters without field-dependent renormalization.
  • ad hoc to paper The Chern-Simons statistical flux b(r) = 2 phi0 rho can be approximated as a uniform field bbar.
    Central method in Sec. IV; authors acknowledge nonuniform b is not treated self-consistently and may favor FCI over CDW order.
  • domain assumption Electron interactions are captured only through mean-field flux attachment; no explicit interacting Hamiltonian is diagonalized.
    FCI claims are inferred from single-particle composite-fermion gaps; interactions are assumed to stabilize the states.
  • domain assumption Zeeman splitting can be neglected or absorbed by valley polarization at high magnetic field.
    Orbital effects are the focus; Zeeman is discussed in Sec. III B but not included in the spectra.
  • standard math Chern numbers of filled composite fermion bands determine fractional Hall conductivity via sigma_xy = (e^2/h) C/(2C+1).
    Equation (18), standard relation for s=2 flux attachment.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Electromagnetic response and emergent topological orders in transition metal dichalcogenide MoTe$_2$ bilayers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VA6FV2UM

@misc{pith2026250504685,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Electromagnetic response and emergent topological orders in transition metal dichalcogenide MoTe$_2$ bilayers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VA6FV2UM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.04685}
}
abstract

Twisted bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides, such as MoTe$_2$, provide a versatile platform for exploring correlated topological phases. This work investigates the interplay of perpendicular magnetic and electric fields in tuning the electronic structure and emergent topological orders of twisted bilayer MoTe$_2$ (t-MoTe$_2$) across two distinct regimes: a low-twist-angle phase ($\theta\approx2.1^\circ$) hosting multiple Chern bands of identical Chern numbers per valley, and a higher-angle phase ($\theta\approx 3.89^\circ$) featuring Haldane-like bands with opposite Chern numbers. Using a continuum model incorporating moir\'e potentials up to second harmonics, we compute the Hofstadter fractal spectra under applied fields, revealing Landau fan structures and magnetic-flux-dependent band topology. These fractal spectra are useful in studying emergent topological orders in terms of the composite fermion picture, where the statistical Chern-Simons flux is approximated as a uniform gauge field. We demonstrate that the system hosts both Jain-sequence fractional Chern insulators (FCIs) and non-Jain "fractal FCIs" with higher Chern numbers. The electric field suppresses composite fermion gaps and induces topological quantum phase transitions. Furthermore, our analysis extends to valley-contrasting flux attachment, proposing pathways to describe fractional quantum spin Hall states.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.04685 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a,b) The moir´e bands (K valley) at 2.1 and 3.89 de [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The moir´e Hofstadter spectra at zero displacement [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The moir´e Hofstadter spectra at 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The moir´e Hofstadter spectra at 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Hofstadter spectrum at 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Hofstadter spectrum at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Composite fermion band gap at 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Composite fermion band gap at 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Composite fermion band gap at 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Composite fermion band gap at 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Hofstadter spectrum at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Anyon Dispersion in Aharonov-Casher Bands and Implications for Twisted MoTe${}_2$

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Laughlin quasiholes in an Aharonov-Casher band acquire a finite dispersion, of order 1 meV in twisted MoTe2, produced by non-uniform quantum geometry and the anyon Berry phase.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [37]

    I. Das, X. Lu, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, Z.-D. Song, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. A. Bernevig, and D. K. Efetov, Symmetry-broken Chern insulators and Rashba-like Landau-level crossings in magic-angle bilayer graphene, Nature Physics 17, 710 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [1]

    The parabolic terms are unaffected since they are in- dependent of y

    work page

  3. [2]

    subbands

    for the bottom/top layers, as shown in Fig. 1(d). The low-energy Hamilto- nian for (K,↑) states is described by the by the single particle Hamiltonian[3] H0 K,↑(p,r) = −ℏ2(p−kb)2 2m∗ +Vb(r) T (r) T†(r) −ℏ2(p−kt)2 2m∗ +Vt(r) ! , (1) where p =−iℏ∇ is the momentum operator, m∗ is an effective mass, Vb(r) and Vt(r) denote, respectively, the intra-layer moir´ ...

    work page

  4. [3]

    For the other fractal FCI states, the gaps are smaller and each filled composite band car- ries a higher Chern number C = 2 or C = 3

    These features imply ro- bust FCI states and validate the uniform flux approx- imation a posteriori . For the other fractal FCI states, the gaps are smaller and each filled composite band car- ries a higher Chern number C = 2 or C = 3. Exam- ples of such states are shown in Fig. 5 at filling frac- tions ν = 4/5, 2/9, 1/5, characterized by Hall conduc- tan...

    work page

  5. [4]

    subbands

    The matrix element of the Moir´ e potential and tun- neling terms (see Eq.(A16)) is modified as ⟨λ′,n 2,y 0,j−m,k 2|Vmg1+ng2|λ,n 1,y 0,j,k 2⟩ =eik2m∆⟨n2,y−m∆|Vmg1+ng2|n1,y⟩. (A21) Appendix B: Chern-Simons Flux attachment We consider the two-dimensional system with Nuc = N1N2 unit cells, where N1 and N2 are, respectively, the number of unit cells extended ...

    work page

  6. [5]

    In this case, νCF = 1 2 + Z, corresponding to a half-filled CF band

    (B5) (a) p is an odd integer. In this case, νCF = 1 2 + Z, corresponding to a half-filled CF band. This corresponds to even denominator filling fraction ν, where CFs are gapless and form a Femi surface. (b)p is an even integer. We denotep = 2m1 and write q = 2m2 + 1, since q must be odd since (p,q ) = 1. Then the filling fraction is ν = 1 2 p q = m1 2m2+1...

    work page

  7. [6]

    E. Y. Andrei, D. K. Efetov, P. Jarillo-Herrero, A. H. MacDonald, K. F. Mak, T. Senthil, E. Tutuc, A. Yazdani, and A. F. Young, The marvels of moir´ e materials, Nature Reviews Materials 6, 201 (2021)

    2021

  8. [7]

    Xiao, G.-B

    D. Xiao, G.-B. Liu, W. Feng, X. Xu, and W. Yao, Cou- pled spin and valley physics in monolayers of MoS 2 and other group-VI dichalcogenides, Physical review letters 108, 196802 (2012)

    work page 2012

Show all 79 references
  1. [8]

    F. Wu, T. Lovorn, E. Tutuc, I. Martin, and A. H. MacDonald, Topological insulators in twisted transition metal dichalcogenide homobilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 086402 (2019)

    2019

  2. [9]

    Wang, X.-W

    C. Wang, X.-W. Zhang, X. Liu, Y. He, X. Xu, Y. Ran, T. Cao, and D. Xiao, Fractional chern insulator in twisted bilayer MoTe2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 036501 (2024)

    2024

  3. [10]

    T. Wang, M. Wang, W. Kim, S. G. Louie, L. Fu, and M. P. Zaletel, Topology, magnetism and charge order in twisted MoTe 2 at higher integer hole fillings, arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.12531 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  4. [11]

    C.-E. Ahn, W. Lee, K. Yananose, Y. Kim, and G. Y. Cho, Non-abelian fractional quantum anomalous hall states and first landau level physics of the second moir´ e band of twisted bilayer MoTe 2, Phys. Rev. B 110, L161109 (2024)

    2024

  5. [12]

    Zhang, C

    X.-W. Zhang, C. Wang, X. Liu, Y. Fan, T. Cao, and D. Xiao, Polarization-driven band topology evolution in twisted MoTe2 and WSe 2, Nature Communications 15, 4223 (2024)

    2024

  6. [13]

    C. Xu, N. Mao, T. Zeng, and Y. Zhang, Multiple chern bands in twisted MoTe2 and possible non-abelian states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 066601 (2025)

    2025

  7. [14]

    Wang, X.-W

    C. Wang, X.-W. Zhang, X. Liu, J. Wang, T. Cao, and D. Xiao, Higher landau-level analogs and signatures of non-abelian states in twisted bilayer MoTe 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 076503 (2025)

    2025

  8. [15]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Model for a quantum hall effect with- out landau levels: Condensed-matter realization of the ”parity anomaly”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015 (1988)

    1988

  9. [16]

    J. Cai, E. Anderson, C. Wang, X. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Holtzmann, Y. Zhang, F. Fan, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, et al. , Signatures of fractional quantum anomalous hall states in twisted MoTe 2, Nature 622, 63 14 (2023)

    2023

  10. [17]

    H. Park, J. Cai, E. Anderson, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, X. Liu, C. Wang, W. Holtzmann, C. Hu, Z. Liu, et al. , Observa- tion of fractionally quantized anomalous hall effect, Na- ture 622, 74 (2023)

    2023

  11. [18]

    Y. Zeng, Z. Xia, K. Kang, J. Zhu, P. Kn¨ uppel, C. Vaswani, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Thermodynamic evidence of fractional chern in- sulator in moir´ e MoTe2, Nature 622, 69 (2023)

    2023

  12. [19]

    F. Xu, Z. Sun, T. Jia, C. Liu, C. Xu, C. Li, Y. Gu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Tong, et al., Observation of integer and fractional quantum anomalous hall effects in twisted bilayer MoTe2, Physical Review X 13, 031037 (2023)

    2023

  13. [20]

    H. Park, J. Cai, E. Anderson, X.-W. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Holtzmann, W. Li, C. Wang, C. Hu, Y. Zhao, et al. , Ferromagnetism and topology of the higher flat band in a fractional chern insulator, Nature Physics , 1 (2025)

    2025

  14. [21]

    H. Park, W. Li, C. Hu, C. Beach, M. Gon¸ calves, J. F. Mendez-Valderrama, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, D. Cobden, et al. , Observa- tion of high-temperature dissipationless fractional chern insulator, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.10989 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  15. [22]

    F. Xu, Z. Sun, J. Li, C. Zheng, C. Xu, J. Gao, T. Jia, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Tong, et al. , Signa- tures of unconventional superconductivity near reentrant and fractional quantum anomalous hall insulators, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.06972 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Redekop, C

    E. Redekop, C. Zhang, H. Park, J. Cai, E. Anderson, O. Sheekey, T. Arp, G. Babikyan, S. Salters, K. Watan- abe, et al. , Direct magnetic imaging of fractional chern insulators in twisted MoTe 2, Nature 635, 584 (2024)

    2024

  17. [24]

    K. Kang, B. Shen, Y. Qiu, Y. Zeng, Z. Xia, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Evidence of the fractional quantum spin hall effect in moir´ e MoTe2, Nature 628, 522 (2024)

    2024

  18. [25]

    K. Kang, Y. Qiu, B. Shen, K. Lee, Z. Xia, Y. Zeng, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Time-reversal symmetry breaking fractional quantum spin hall insulator in moir´ e MoTe 2, arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.02525 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  19. [26]

    D. R. Hofstadter, Energy levels and wave functions of Bloch electrons in rational and irrational magnetic fields, Physical Review B 14, 2239 (1976)

    1976

  20. [27]

    Bistritzer and A

    R. Bistritzer and A. H. MacDonald, Moir´ e butterflies in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 84, 035440 (2011)

    2011

  21. [28]

    Hejazi, C

    K. Hejazi, C. Liu, and L. Balents, Landau levels in twisted bilayer graphene and semiclassical orbits, Phys. Rev. B 100, 035115 (2019)

    2019

  22. [29]

    Wang and L

    J. Wang and L. H. Santos, Classification of topological phase transitions and van hove singularity steering mech- anism in graphene superlattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 236805 (2020)

    2020

  23. [30]

    Herzog-Arbeitman, Z.-D

    J. Herzog-Arbeitman, Z.-D. Song, N. Regnault, and B. A. Bernevig, Hofstadter topology: Noncrystalline topologi- cal materials at high flux, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 236804 (2020)

    2020

  24. [31]

    C. R. Dean, L. Wang, P. Maher, C. Forsythe, F. Ghahari, Y. Gao, J. Katoch, M. Ishigami, P. Moon, M. Koshino, et al., Hofstadter’s butterfly and the fractal quantum hall effect in moir´ e superlattices, Nature497, 598 (2013)

    2013

  25. [32]

    L. A. Ponomarenko, R. V. Gorbachev, G. L. Yu, D. C. Elias, R. Jalil, A. A. Patel, A. Mishchenko, A. S. Mayorov, C. R. Woods, J. R. Wallbank, M. Mucha- Kruczynski, B. A. Piot, M. Potemski, I. V. Grigorieva, K. S. Novoselov, F. Guinea, V. I. Fal’ko, and A. K. Geim, Cloning of di...

    2013

  26. [33]

    B. Hunt, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, A. F. Young, M. Yankowitz, B. J. LeRoy, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, P. Moon, M. Koshino, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and R. C. Ashoori, Massive Dirac Fermions and Hofstadter But- terfly in a van der Waals Heterostructure, Science 340, 1427 (2013)

    2013

  27. [34]

    Forsythe, X

    C. Forsythe, X. Zhou, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Pa- supathy, P. Moon, M. Koshino, P. Kim, and C. R. Dean, Band structure engineering of 2D materials using pat- terned dielectric superlattices, Nature Nanotechnology 13, 566 (2018)

    2018

  28. [35]

    E. M. Spanton, A. A. Zibrov, H. Zhou, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. P. Zaletel, and A. F. Young, Obser- vation of fractional Chern insulators in a van der Waals heterostructure, Science 360, 62 (2018)

    2018

  29. [36]

    I. Das, C. Shen, A. Jaoui, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, A. Chew, C.-W. Cho, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. A. Piot, B. A. Bernevig, and D. K. Efetov, Observation of reentrant correlated insulators and interaction-driven fermi-surface reconstructions at one magnetic flux quan- tum per m...

    2022

  30. [38]

    Balents, C

    L. Balents, C. R. Dean, D. K. Efetov, and A. F. Young, Superconductivity and strong correlations in moir´ e flat bands, Nature Physics 16, 725 (2020)

    2020

  31. [39]

    Stepanov, M

    P. Stepanov, M. Xie, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, X. Lu, A. H. MacDonald, B. A. Bernevig, and D. K. Efetov, Competing zero-field chern insulators in superconducting twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 197701 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    Saito, J

    Y. Saito, J. Ge, L. Rademaker, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. A. Abanin, and A. F. Young, Hofstadter subband ferromagnetism and symmetry-broken Chern insulators in twisted bilayer graphene, Nature Physics 17, 478 (2021)

    2021

  33. [41]

    S. Wu, Z. Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and E. Y. Andrei, Chern insulators, van hove singularities and topological flat bands in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature materials 20, 488 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    M. Wang, X. Wang, and O. Vafek, Phase diagram of twisted bilayer MoTe2 in a magnetic field with an account for the electron-electron interaction, Phys. Rev. B 110, L201107 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    Kol´ aˇ r, K

    K. Kol´ aˇ r, K. Yang, F. von Oppen, and C. Mora, Hof- stadter spectrum of chern bands in twisted transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B 110, 115114 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    Lu and L

    T. Lu and L. H. Santos, Fractional chern insulators in twisted bilayer MoTe2: A composite fermion perspective, Physical Review Letters 133, 186602 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    J. K. Jain, Composite-fermion approach for the frac- tional quantum hall effect, Physical review letters 63, 199 (1989)

    1989

  38. [46]

    Lopez and E

    A. Lopez and E. Fradkin, Fractional quantum hall effect and chern-simons gauge theories, Phys. Rev. B 44, 5246 15 (1991)

    1991

  39. [47]

    J. Chen, Q. Li, X. Wang, and W. Li, Fractional chern insulator and quantum anomalous hall crystal in twisted MoTe2, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.07932 (2025)

    2025

  40. [48]

    B. A. Bernevig and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum spin hall ef- fect, Physical review letters 96, 106802 (2006)

    2006

  41. [49]

    Levin and A

    M. Levin and A. Stern, Fractional topological insulators, Physical review letters 103, 196803 (2009)

    2009

  42. [50]

    Santos, T

    L. Santos, T. Neupert, S. Ryu, C. Chamon, and C. Mudry, Time-reversal symmetric hierarchy of frac- tional incompressible liquids, Physical Review B 84, 165138 (2011)

    2011

  43. [51]

    Neupert, L

    T. Neupert, L. Santos, S. Ryu, C. Chamon, and C. Mudry, Fractional topological liquids with time- reversal symmetry and their lattice realization, Physical Review B 84, 165107 (2011)

    2011

  44. [52]

    Y.-M. Wu, D. Shaffer, Z. Wu, and L. H. Santos, Time- reversal invariant topological moir´ e flat band: A platform for the fractional quantum spin hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 109, 115111 (2024)

    2024

  45. [53]

    Abouelkomsan and L

    A. Abouelkomsan and L. Fu, Non-abelian spin hall insu- lator, Physical Review Research 7, 023083 (2025)

    2025

  46. [54]

    C.-M. Jian, M. Cheng, and C. Xu, Minimal fractional topological insulator in half-filled conjugate moir´ e chern bands, Physical Review X 15, 021063 (2025)

    2025

  47. [55]

    May-Mann, A

    J. May-Mann, A. Stern, and T. Devakul, Theory of half- integer fractional quantum spin hall edges, Phys. Rev. B 111, L201111 (2025)

    2025

  48. [56]

    I. Sodemann Villadiego, Halperin states of particles and holes in ideal time reversal invariant pairs of chern bands and the fractional quantum spin hall effect in moir´ e MoTe2, Physical Review B 110, 045114 (2024)

    2024

  49. [57]

    Chou and S

    Y.-Z. Chou and S. Das Sarma, Composite helical edges from abelian fractional topological insulators, Physical Review B 110, 155117 (2024)

    2024

  50. [58]

    Y. H. Kwan, G. Wagner, J. Yu, A. K. Dagnino, Y. Jiang, X. Xu, B. A. Bernevig, T. Neupert, and N. Regnault, When could abelian fractional topological insulators ex- ist in twisted MoTe2(and other systems), arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.02560 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Liu, W.-Y

    G.-B. Liu, W.-Y. Shan, Y. Yao, W. Yao, and D. Xiao, Three-band tight-binding model for monolayers of group- VIB transition metal dichalcogenides, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 88, 085433 (2013)

    2013

  52. [60]

    Agarwal and M

    M. Agarwal and M. Capers, The measurement of the lattice parameters of molybdenum ditelluride, Applied Crystallography 5, 63 (1972)

    1972

  53. [61]

    Murthy and R

    G. Murthy and R. Shankar, Hamiltonian theories of the fractional quantum hall effect, Reviews of Modern Physics 75, 1101 (2003)

    2003

  54. [62]

    Jiang, F

    C. Jiang, F. Liu, J. Cuadra, Z. Huang, K. Li, A. Rasmita, A. Srivastava, Z. Liu, and W.-B. Gao, Zeeman splitting via spin-valley-layer coupling in bilayer MoTe 2, Nature communications 8, 802 (2017)

    2017

  55. [63]

    Y.-F. Lin, Y. Xu, S.-T. Wang, S.-L. Li, M. Yamamoto, A. Aparecido-Ferreira, W. Li, H. Sun, S. Nakaharai, W.- B. Jian, et al., Ambipolar MoTe2 transistors and their ap- plications in logic circuits, Advanced Materials 26, 3263 (2014)

    2014

  56. [64]

    Q. Wang, J. Chen, Y. Zhang, L. Hu, R. Liu, C. Cong, and Z.-J. Qiu, Precise layer control of MoTe 2 by ozone treatment, Nanomaterials 9, 756 (2019)

    2019

  57. [65]

    Zazpe, H

    R. Zazpe, H. Sopha, J. Charvot, R. Krumpolec, J. Rodriguez-Pereira, J. Michaliˇ cka, J. Mistr´ ık, D. Baˇ ca, M. Motola, F. Bureˇ s, et al. , 2d MoTe 2 nanosheets by atomic layer deposition: Excellent photo-electrocatalytic properties, Applied Materials Today 23, 101017 (2021)

    2021

  58. [66]

    Laturia, M

    A. Laturia, M. L. Van de Put, and W. G. Vandenberghe, Dielectric properties of hexagonal boron nitride and tran- sition metal dichalcogenides: from monolayer to bulk, npj 2D Materials and Applications 2, 6 (2018)

    2018

  59. [67]

    Kutrowska-Girzycka, E

    J. Kutrowska-Girzycka, E. Zieba-Ost´ oj, D. Biega´ nska, M. Florian, A. Steinhoff, E. Rogowicz, P. Mrowi´ nski, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, C. Gies, et al. , Exploring the effect of dielectric screening on neutral and charged- exciton properties in monolayer and bilayer MoTe 2,...

    2022

  60. [68]

    J. Y. Lee, C. Wang, M. P. Zaletel, A. Vishwanath, and Y.-C. He, Emergent multi-flavor QED 3 at the plateau transition between fractional chern insulators: Appli- cations to graphene heterostructures, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031015 (2018)

    2018

  61. [69]

    J. K. Jain, Composite fermions (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

    2007

  62. [70]

    Kol and N

    A. Kol and N. Read, Fractional quantum hall effect in a periodic potential, Phys. Rev. B 48, 8890 (1993)

    1993

  63. [71]

    M¨ oller and N

    G. M¨ oller and N. R. Cooper, Fractional chern insulators in harper-hofstadter bands with higher chern number, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 126401 (2015)

    2015

  64. [72]

    Murthy and R

    G. Murthy and R. Shankar, Hamiltonian theory of frac- tionally filled chern bands, Phys. Rev. B 86, 195146 (2012)

    2012

  65. [73]

    Sohal, L

    R. Sohal, L. H. Santos, and E. Fradkin, Chern-simons composite fermion theory of fractional chern insulators, Phys. Rev. B 97, 125131 (2018)

    2018

  66. [74]

    Goldman, A

    H. Goldman, A. P. Reddy, N. Paul, and L. Fu, Zero-field composite fermi liquid in twisted semiconductor bilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 136501 (2023)

    2023

  67. [75]

    J. Dong, J. Wang, P. J. Ledwith, A. Vishwanath, and D. E. Parker, Composite fermi liquid at zero magnetic field in twisted MoTe 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 136502 (2023)

    2023

  68. [76]

    Y. Xie, A. T. Pierce, J. M. Park, D. E. Parker, E. Khalaf, P. Ledwith, Y. Cao, S. H. Lee, S. Chen, P. R. Forrester, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Vishwanath, P. Jarillo- Herrero, and A. Yacoby, Fractional chern insulators in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature 600, 439 (2021)

    2021

  69. [77]

    hall crys- tal

    Z. Teˇ sanovi´ c, F. Axel, and B. Halperin, “hall crys- tal”versus wigner crystal, Physical Review B 39, 8525 (1989)

    1989

  70. [78]

    Y. Xu, S. Liu, D. A. Rhodes, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Hone, V. Elser, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Correlated in- sulating states at fractional fillings of moir´ e superlattices, Nature 587, 214 (2020)

    2020

  71. [79]

    Huang, T

    X. Huang, T. Wang, S. Miao, C. Wang, Z. Li, Z. Lian, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. Okamoto, D. Xiao, et al., Correlated insulating states at fractional fillings of the WS2/WSe2 moir´ e lattice, Nature Physics17, 715 (2021)

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.