Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 114 references

Exploring the Formation Mechanisms of Double Neutron Star Systems: An Analytical Perspective

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read An analytical study of double neutron stars claims a single orbital product, e×P_orb=0.05, separates electron-capture from core-collapse formation, with a 1.30-solar-mass threshold for the electron-capture channel.

desk verdict The paper's own Table 2 contradicts its e×P_orb classification, so the reported 1.30 M_sun threshold is an artifact and the analysis is not publishable as-is. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.04778 v1 pith:UK2E4NZQ submitted 2025-05-07 astro-ph.HE

Ali Taani , Mohammed Abu-Saleem , Mohammad Mardini , Hussam Aljboor , Mohammad Tayem This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords doubleneutronstarselectron-capturesupernovaecore-collapsestarmassesorbitaleccentricitypulsarbinariessupernovakicksbinaryevolution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that the known double neutron star systems in the Galactic disk are not one population: the second-born neutron star is made either by an electron-capture supernova or by a core-collapse supernova, and the two channels can be told apart by a single orbital number, e×P_orb, with a dividing line at 0.05. Systems below the line are claimed to be electron-capture products that will merge; systems above it are core-collapse products that will not. The analysis places a critical companion mass of 1.30 solar masses (±0.22) on the electron-capture channel and associates it with short, nearly circular orbits and weak kicks. A reader should care because the classification links each system's orbit to its explosion history, its merger fate, and the expected mass of the neutron star, which feeds gravitational-wave and pulsar-population predictions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the product e×P_orb, orbital eccentricity times orbital period in days, used as a boundary curve e×P_orb = 0.05 in the eccentricity–period plane. It works as a proxy for the supernova kick: near-symmetric electron-capture explosions leave tight, nearly circular orbits below the curve, while core-collapse explosions with larger kicks leave wider, more eccentric orbits above it. Two supporting discriminators carry the mass argument: the companion-mass threshold 1.30±0.22 M⊙, read off the companion-mass versus eccentricity diagram, and HDBSCAN clustering in the three-dimensional space of mass, orbital period, and magnetic field, which independently recovers two groups.

What would settle it

Find a precisely timed DNS with a well-measured non-recycled companion mass above 1.52 M⊙ (1.30 + 0.22) whose orbit has e×P_orb below 0.05, or a companion below 1.08 M⊙ with e×P_orb above 0.05; either case breaks the claimed coupling between the orbital line and the mass threshold. A practical version is to enlarge the current sample of several dozen DNSs and count how often the two criteria assign a system to different channels.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the paper's own terms, the discovery is a dichotomy: when 24 Galactic-disk DNSs are plotted by orbital eccentricity against orbital period, the curve e×P_orb = 0.05 separates an electron-capture group (short-period, low-eccentricity systems that are merging and formed with minimal kicks and significant mass loss) from a core-collapse group (wide, eccentric, non-merging systems formed with larger kicks). The accompanying mass analysis finds that the electron-capture route to a neutron star is bounded by a companion mass of about 1.30±0.22 M⊙, while core-collapse neutron stars appear at higher masses. The paper supports the dichotomy with a T-test and reports a roughly 3σ difference between the mean masses of recycled and non-recycled components, and with HDBSCAN clustering that separates the two groups in the space of mass, orbital period, and magnetic field.

Load-bearing premise

The whole classification depends on the assumption that a single boundary value, orbital eccentricity times orbital period equal to 0.05, truly separates electron-capture from core-collapse supernovae; if that value is not a physical divider, the mass threshold and all group differences lose their foundation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any newly discovered DNS can be classified as a likely merger or non-merger from its orbit alone, which sharpens the merger-rate input to gravitational-wave detectors.
  • The companion mass of the second-born neutron star becomes a direct observational proxy for the supernova type, complementing kick and eccentricity measurements.
  • If the dichotomy is real, electron-capture supernovae are the dominant route to low-mass, low-eccentricity, merging DNS systems, so gravitational-wave detections should reveal a population of low-total-mass mergers from this channel.
  • Wide-field radio surveys should find more DNSs on both sides of the line; their measured masses and orbits will test whether the two clusters remain separated as the sample grows.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the orbital criterion and the mass criterion can disagree in the paper's own table (for example, PSR B1913+16 has e×P_orb ≈ 0.20 yet is placed in the electron-capture group), a practical next step is an arbitration rule that decides which classifier wins when they conflict.
  • A direct kinematic test is available: proper-motion surveys should show that systems below the e×P_orb line have low systemic transverse velocities and systems above it high velocities; the few DNSs with VLBI astrometry could be expanded into a full-sample check.
  • If the 1.30±0.22 M⊙ threshold is confirmed, it becomes a calibration point for electron-capture supernova models, quantifying the boundary at which an ONeMg core collapses to a neutron star rather than leaving a white dwarf.
  • The same e×P_orb product might serve as a fast formation-channel diagnostic in other compact binaries, such as neutron star–white dwarf systems, where the kick history is harder to recover from timing alone.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper compiles 24 Galactic disk double neutron star (DNS) systems and proposes an analytical classification of their formation channels. It adopts the e×P_orb=0.05 boundary from Ferdman et al. (2020) to separate electron-capture supernovae (ECSNe) from core-collapse supernovae (CC), reports a critical companion mass threshold of 1.30±0.22 M_sun for ECSNe formation, and further applies a t-test and HDBSCAN clustering to support the two-channel picture. The abstract claims that ECSNe produce short-period, low-eccentricity merging systems, while CC produce non-merging systems.

Significance. If the claims were established, the paper would supply a simple observational separator between electron-capture and core-collapse DNS formation and a calibrated companion-mass threshold. The compilation of 24 disk DNS systems in Table 2 and the explicit statement of the classification rule and HDBSCAN hyperparameters are useful and warrant credit. However, the central claims are not supported by the manuscript's own data: the stated e×P_orb criterion is violated by 12 of the 16 ECSNe-labeled systems, the t-test is reported as below the 95% critical value while the text claims significance, and the 1.30 M_sun threshold is not defined operationally. The paper does formulate a falsifiable rule, but the rule is not applied consistently, so the headline results currently read as artifacts of the grouping.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2, Table 2; §3] The stated separator e×P_orb=0.05 is not applied in Table 2. Direct multiplication of the tabulated values gives e×P_orb<0.05 for only four of the sixteen ECSNe rows (J0737−3039A/B, J1906+0746, J1913+1102, and J1946+2052); the other twelve, including B1913+16 (≈0.20), B1534+12 (≈0.11), J1755−2550 (≈0.87), and J1901+065 (≈5.29), lie above the cut. Since these same labels define the groups in Fig. 7 and are the input to the mass-threshold analysis, the central classification claim rests on a criterion that fails for 75% of the ECSNe sample. Section 3 further states that B1534+12 and B1913+16 formed through core collapse, contradicting their ECSNe listing in Table 2.
  2. [§4.1, Eq. (1)] The t-test is internally contradictory and the calculation is not reproducible. The paper reports t=2.02, quotes the 95% critical value as 2.075, and explicitly states that the calculated t-value falls below the 95% threshold; nevertheless §4 and §5 claim a statistically significant mass difference at 95% confidence and a '3 sigma' distinction. The degrees of freedom are given inconsistently (d=2n−2=16 while the critical values are quoted for d=24, with n1=16 and n2=8 implying df=22), and Eq. (1) uses sqrt(2/n1+2/n2) in the denominator instead of the standard sqrt(1/n1+1/n2). The statistical evidence for the mass difference needs to be corrected or removed.
  3. [§5, Fig. 5] The critical companion-mass threshold of 1.30±0.22 M_sun is introduced without a defined estimator or fitting procedure. Its own sample contradicts it: PSR J1906+0746 is classified as ECSNe with Mc=1.32 M_sun, above the stated threshold, while the CC group contains systems with Mc<1.30 M_sun (e.g., J1759+5036 with 0.84 M_sun and J1811−1736 with >0.93 M_sun). Without a reproducible operational definition, the headline 'critical value' is not a falsifiable result.
  4. [Abstract; §2, Table 2] The summary claim that ECSNe 'predominantly produces DNS systems with short orbital (P_orb≤0.25 d), nearly circular orbits' is not supported by the ECSNe rows of Table 2, which include P_orb=4.07 d (J0453+1559), 9.7 d (J1755−2550), and 14.45 d (J1901+065), and eccentricities up to 0.62 (B1913+16). These statements must be reconciled with the sample or removed.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'nearly circular orbits (e≃0.2)' is internally inconsistent, and Table 2 shows ECSNe-labeled eccentricities ranging up to 0.62; please rephrase to match the actual sample.
  2. [§4 and §5] The text states that non-recycled NSs have a higher average mass than recycled NSs, but §5 reports means of 1.370 and 1.48 M_sun for the two samples; please clarify which mean belongs to which group.
  3. [Table 2] The reference numbering is duplicated (for example, entries 14–16 are used for two different systems), and the J1753−2240 row appears to list only one mass value; please correct the table and state how the one-sided mass limits enter the calculations.
  4. [Section 4, HDBSCAN] The hyperparameter choices are listed, but the analysis does not report normalized feature values, cluster membership, or a measure of cluster validity; including these would make the clustering analysis reproducible.
  5. [Fig. 7] The e×P_orb units are not explicitly stated in the figure; since P_orb is in days and e is dimensionless, the product has units of days, and this should be stated for the 0.05 threshold.
  6. [Section 2] The exclusion of globular-cluster DNSs is justified by a one-sentence statement that their properties are 'uniquely different'; because this removes 8 of 32 known systems, a quantitative comparison of their orbital parameters with the disk sample would strengthen the analysis.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 7.0 of 10

The claim that ECSNe systems are e×P_orb<0.05 systems is the paper's own class definition, and the 1.30 M_sun threshold is a companion-mass summary of the same pre-assigned grouping, so the headline results reduce to the input classification.

  1. self definitional [Section 2 (The observational sample); cf. Abstract]
    "we divided the DNSs into two groups based on eccentricity and orbital period. A specific criterion exPorb = 0.05 is used to distinguish between these classes. In contrast to systems with e x Porb < 0.05 falling in the region of indicative of merging systems (see [Ferdman et al., 2020], they exhibit low eccentricity and short orbital periods, suggesting that they were formed by the ECSNe process."

    The paper assigns the label 'ECSNe' to systems satisfying e×P_orb<0.05 and 'CC' to systems with e×P_orb>0.05, then reports as a result that ECSNe processes are associated with the e×P_orb<0.05 merging region. The association is not an empirical derivation; it is the defining inequality used to build the two groups. The abstract's statement 'ECSNe processes are typically associated with merging systems (e×P_orb<0.05)' therefore restates the classification input rather than testing it.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section 2 and Section 5 (Discussions and Conclusions)]
    "This conclusion is based on their relatively long orbital periods with high eccentricities and a companions mass of approximately 1.30M⊙±0.22M⊙. ... An analysis of companion masses revealed a crucial threshold round 1.30M⊙±0.22M⊙, playing a significant role in the evolutionary process of DNSs."

    The '1.30±0.22 M_sun critical threshold' is introduced as a companion-mass property of the systems already classified as core-collapse in Section 2, and then promoted in Section 5 to a threshold that determines whether formation is ECSNe or CC. No model calculation is given for the threshold; it is a summary statistic of the same sample that was split by the e×P_orb criterion. Thus the headline mass 'prediction' is forced by the input grouping rather than independently derived.

full rationale

The paper is mostly an observational data compilation with statistical descriptions, and most of its self-citations are not load-bearing. However, the central classification claim and the headline mass threshold are not independently derived. Section 2 explicitly divides DNSs into ECSNe and CC classes using e×P_orb=0.05, so the abstract's finding that ECSNe systems reside in the e×P_orb<0.05 region is the definition of the classes, not a test of a physical hypothesis. The 1.30±0.22 M_sun value is presented first as the companion-mass characteristic of the already-assigned core-collapse group and later as a 'crucial threshold' separating the two channels, which makes the mass result a restatement of the input grouping rather than a first-principles prediction. The paper even acknowledges inconsistencies, noting that 'several systems deviate from the curves' predictions,' and its own Table 2 places many systems with e×P_orb>0.05 in the ECSNe group, further showing that the label and the criterion are not consistently tied and that the threshold is an artifact of the grouping rather than an externally validated physical boundary. These issues affect the central claims, so a score of 7 is appropriate; the paper is not fully equivalent to its inputs because it also contains independent statistical procedures such as the T-test and HDBSCAN clustering, but those do not rescue the EC-vs-CC separation or the mass threshold.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the imported e times P_orb boundary, the treatment of companion masses as exact, and the exclusion of globular cluster systems. No new physical entities are introduced. The critical mass threshold is a derived sample mean, not a theoretically predicted value, and the HDBSCAN hyperparameters are additional user choices.

free parameters (3)
  • e times P_orb classification threshold = 0.05
    Imported from Ferdman et al. (2020) and used as the hard separator between ECSNe and CC groups; no derivation or uncertainty is given for this value, and the paper does not test alternative boundaries.
  • critical companion mass threshold = 1.30 M_sun ± 0.22
    Derived from the sample split defined by the e times P_orb criterion; it is the mean companion mass of the CC-classified group, so it is a fitted property of the split rather than an independent prediction.
  • HDBSCAN hyperparameters = min_cluster_size = 5, min_samples = 5, leaf, minimum confidence = 20 percent
    Chosen by the authors for the clustering analysis; the resulting cluster structure depends on these choices, and no sensitivity study is presented.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The boundary e times P_orb = 0.05 separates merging (ECSNe) from non-merging (CC) DNS systems.
    Taken from Ferdman et al. (2020); the paper does not test whether this boundary is physically sharp for the updated sample and does not propagate its uncertainty.
  • domain assumption Companion mass in a DNS is the mass of the second-born neutron star.
    Assumed throughout Sec. 4; for systems with lower limits on companion mass (J1829+2456, J1930-1852, J1811-1736, J1753-2240) the exact mass is unknown, yet all are included in the mass analysis without handling censoring.
  • ad hoc to paper Globular cluster DNSs can be excluded because their properties differ from disk systems.
    Stated in Sec. 4: 'we do not consider the DNS systems residing in globular clusters ... since their characteristic properties are uniquely different.' This exclusion removes 8 of 32 known DNSs and shapes the sample.
  • standard math Standard t-test assumptions (independent samples, normal distributions, pooled variance) hold for the DNS mass groups.
    Used in Eq. (1)-(2) for the mass comparison; the paper does not test normality or homoscedasticity, and the effective degrees of freedom are stated inconsistently.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exploring the Formation Mechanisms of Double Neutron Star Systems: An Analytical Perspective." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UK2E4NZQ

@misc{pith2026250504778,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exploring the Formation Mechanisms of Double Neutron Star Systems: An Analytical Perspective},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UK2E4NZQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.04778}
}
abstract

Double Neutron Stars (DNSs) are unique probes to study various aspects of modern astrophysics. Recent discoveries have confirmed direct connections between DNSs and supernova explosions. This provides valuable information about the evolutionary history of these systems, especially regarding whether the second-born Neutron Star (NS) originated from either a Core-Collapse ($CC$) or Electron-Capture Supernovae ($ECSNe$) event. The provided scale diagram illustrates the distribution of different types of DNSs on the basis of their orbital parameters and other factors, including mass loss. As a result, the physical processes in DNSs vary depending on the formation mechanisms of the second-born NS and characteristics of the systems. $ECSNe$ processes are typically associated with merging systems ($e\times{P_{orb}}< 0.05$), while $CC$ processes are more commonly linked to non-merging systems ($e\times{P_{orb}}> 0.05$). Our results suggest a critical mass threshold of 1.30$M_\odot \pm 0.22M_\odot$ (critical value) for the $ECSNe$ process to form an NS, while $CC$ processes might occur at higher masses. Examining the orbital parameters of DNSs in a known gravitational potential can enhance our understanding of the theoretical predictions for DNS progenitor characteristics. It turns out that the $ECSNe$ process predominantly produces DNS systems with short orbital ($P_{orb} \leq 0.25 d$), nearly circular orbits ($e\simeq 0.2$), accompanied by minimal kick velocities imparted on the proto-NS and significant mass loss. In contrast, their orbital dynamics in a known gravitational potential plays a crucial role in enhancing our understanding of the SNe geometry and the formation and evolution processes among different NS samples.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    B. P. Abbott , R. Abbott , T. D. Abbott , and et al. GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence . , 116 0 (24): 0 241103, 2016

    2016

  2. [2]

    B. P. Abbott , R. Abbott , T. D. Abbott , and et al. GW170814: A Three-Detector Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Coalescence . , 119 0 (14): 0 141101, 2017 a

    2017

  3. [3]

    B. P. Abbott , R. Abbott , T. D. Abbott , and et al. GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral . , 119 0 (16): 0 161101, 2017 b

    2017

  4. [4]

    B. P. Abbott , R. Abbott , T. D. Abbott , and et al. GW190425: Observation of a Compact Binary Coalescence with Total Mass 3.4 M _ . , 892 0 (1): 0 L3, 2020

    2020

  5. [5]

    Abbott and et al

    R. Abbott and et al. GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run . Physical Review X, 13 0 (4): 0 041039, 2023

    2023

  6. [6]

    Abu-Saleem and A

    M. Abu-Saleem and A. Taani . Retraction and folding on the hyperbolic black hole . AIP Advances, 11 0 (1): 0 015309, 2021 a

    2021

  7. [7]

    Abu-Saleem and A

    M. Abu-Saleem and A. Taani . Geometric transformations on a topological black hole and their applications . Chinese Journal of Physics, 74: 0 53--59, 2021 b

    2021

  8. [8]

    Acernese and et al

    F. Acernese and et al. Virgo detector characterization and data quality: results from the O3 run . Classical and Quantum Gravity, 40 0 (18): 0 185006, 2023

    2023

Show all 114 references
  1. [9]

    G. Y. Agazie , M. G. Mingyar , M. A. McLaughlin , and et al. The Green Bank Northern Celestial Cap Pulsar Survey. VI. Discovery and Timing of PSR J1759+5036: A Double Neutron Star Binary Pulsar . , 922 0 (1): 0 35, 2021

    2021

  2. [10]

    Aljboor and A

    H. Aljboor and A. Taani . Speckle-interferometric Study of Close Visual Binary System HIP 11253 (HD 14874) using Gaia (DR2 and EDR3) . Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 23 0 (7): 0 075018, 2023

    2023

  3. [11]

    N. A. Almusleh , A. Taani , S. \"O zdemir , M. Rah , M. A. Al-Wardat , G. Zhao , and M. K. Mardini . Metal-poor stars observed with the automated planet finder telescope. III. CEMP-no stars are the descendant of population III stars . Astronomische Nachrichten, 342 0 (4): 0 62...

    2021

  4. [12]

    J. J. Andrews , W. M. Farr , V. Kalogera , and B. Willems . Evolutionary Channels for the Formation of Double Neutron Stars . , 801 0 (1): 0 32, 2015

    2015

  5. [13]

    Bhattacharya and E

    D. Bhattacharya and E. P. J. van den Heuvel . Formation and evolution of binary and millisecond radio pulsars . , 203 0 (1-2): 0 1--124, 1991

    1991

  6. [14]

    S. e. a. Borhanian . Listening to the Universe with next generation ground-based gravitational-wave detectors . , 110 0 (8): 0 083040, 2024

    2024

  7. [15]

    Burgay , N

    M. Burgay , N. D'Amico , A. Possenti , and et al. An increased estimate of the merger rate of double neutron stars from observations of a highly relativistic system . , 426 0 (6966): 0 531--533, 2003

    2003

  8. [16]

    Burgay , D

    M. Burgay , D. Perrodin , and A. Possenti . General Relativity Measurements from Pulsars . In T. M. Belloni , M. M \'e ndez , and C. Zhang , editors, Timing Neutron Stars: Pulsations, Oscillations and Explosions, volume 461 of Astrophysics and Space Science Library, pages 53--95, 2021

    2021

  9. [17]

    A. D. Cameron , D. J. Champion , M. Kramer , and et al. The High Time Resolution Universe Pulsar Survey - XIII. PSR J1757-1854, the most accelerated binary pulsar . , 475 0 (1): 0 L57--L61, 2018

    2018

  10. [18]

    D. J. Champion , D. R. Lorimer , M. A. McLaughlin , J. M. Cordes , Z. Arzoumanian , J. M. Weisberg , and J. H. Taylor . PSR J1829+2456: a relativistic binary pulsar . , 350 0 (4): 0 L61--L65, 2004

    2004

  11. [19]

    Chattopadhyay, S

    D. Chattopadhyay, S. Stevenson, J. R. Hurley, L. J. Rossi, and C. Flynn. Modelling double neutron stars: radio and gravitational waves. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 494 0 (2): 0 1587--1610, 2020. ISSN 0035-8711

    2020

  12. [20]

    Cheng , C

    Z. Cheng , C. Zhang , and A. Taani . Monte Carlo Simulation of Neutron Star Masses . In International Journal of Modern Physics Conference Series, volume 23 of International Journal of Modern Physics Conference Series, pages 157--160, 2013

    2013

  13. [21]

    J. A. Clark , A. Bauswein , N. Stergioulas , and D. Shoemaker . Observing gravitational waves from the post-merger phase of binary neutron star coalescence . Classical and Quantum Gravity, 33 0 (8): 0 085003, 2016

    2016

  14. [22]

    Colom Bernadich , V

    M. Colom Bernadich , V. Balakrishnan , Barr , and E. et al. The MPIfR-MeerKAT Galactic Plane Survey. II. The eccentric double neutron star system PSR J1208 - 5936 and a neutron star merger rate update . , 678: 0 A187, 2023

    2023

  15. [23]

    R. H. D. Corbet . The three types of high-mass X-ray pulsator. , 220: 0 1047--1056, 1986

    1986

  16. [24]

    Corongiu , M

    A. Corongiu , M. Kramer , B. W. Stappers , A. G. Lyne , A. Jessner , A. Possenti , N. D'Amico , and O. L \"o hmer . The binary pulsar PSR J1811-1736: evidence of a low amplitude supernova kick . , 462 0 (2): 0 703--709, 2007

    2007

  17. [25]

    Z. Dai , P. Szkody , A. Taani , P. M. Garnavich , and M. Kennedy . Quiescent photometric modulations of two low-inclination cataclysmic variables KZ Geminorum and TW Virginis . , 606: 0 A45, 2017

    2017

  18. [26]

    J. D. M. Dewi , P. Podsiadlowski , and A. Sena . Double-core evolution and the formation of neutron star binaries with compact companions . , 368 0 (4): 0 1742--1748, 2006

    2006

  19. [27]

    Ding , A

    H. Ding , A. T. Deller , J. K. Swiggum , R. S. Lynch , S. Chatterjee , and T. M. Tauris . VLBA Astrometry of the Galactic Double Neutron Stars PSR J0509+3801 and PSR J1930 1852: A Preliminary Transverse Velocity Distribution of Double Neutron Stars and its Implications . , 970...

    2024

  20. [28]

    A. J. Faulkner , M. Kramer , A. G. Lyne , and et al. PSR J1756-2251: A New Relativistic Double Neutron Star System . , 618 0 (2): 0 L119--L122, 2005

    2005

  21. [29]

    R. D. Ferdman , I. H. Stairs , M. Kramer , and et al. The Double Pulsar: Evidence for Neutron Star Formation without an Iron Core-collapse Supernova . , 767 0 (1): 0 85, 2013

    2013

  22. [30]

    R. D. Ferdman , I. H. Stairs , M. Kramer , and et al. PSR J1756-2251: a pulsar with a low-mass neutron star companion . , 443 0 (3): 0 2183--2196, 2014

    2014

  23. [31]

    R. D. Ferdman , P. C. C. Freire , B. B. P. Perera , and et al. Asymmetric mass ratios for bright double neutron-star mergers . , 583 0 (7815): 0 211--214, 2020

    2020

  24. [32]

    Fonseca , I

    E. Fonseca , I. H. Stairs , and S. E. Thorsett . A Comprehensive Study of Relativistic Gravity Using PSR B1534+12 . , 787 0 (1): 0 82, 2014

    2014

  25. [33]

    Galaudage , C

    S. Galaudage , C. Adamcewicz , X.-J. Zhu , S. Stevenson , and E. Thrane . Heavy Double Neutron Stars: Birth, Midlife, and Death . , 909 0 (2): 0 L19, 2021

    2021

  26. [34]

    Guti \'e rrez , R

    J. Guti \'e rrez , R. Canal , and E. Garc \' a-Berro . The gravitational collapse of ONe electron-degenerate cores and white dwarfs: The role of ^ 24 Mg and ^ 12 C revisited . , 435 0 (1): 0 231--237, 2005

    2005

  27. [35]

    R. A. Hulse and J. H. Taylor . Discovery of a pulsar in a binary system. , 195: 0 L51--L53, 1975

    1975

  28. [36]

    H.-T. Janka . Explosion Mechanisms of Core-Collapse Supernovae . Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 62 0 (1): 0 407--451, 2012

    2012

  29. [37]

    G. H. Janssen , B. W. Stappers , M. Kramer , D. J. Nice , A. Jessner , I. Cognard , and M. B. Purver . Multi-telescope timing of PSR J1518+4904 . , 490 0 (2): 0 753--761, 2008

    2008

  30. [38]

    A. R. John . Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis, Third Edition, Duxbury Advanced. Princeton University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2006

    2006

  31. [39]

    Jones and et al

    S. Jones and et al. Remnants and ejecta of thermonuclear electron-capture supernovae. Constraining oxygen-neon deflagrations in high-density white dwarfs . , 622: 0 A74, 2019

    2019

  32. [40]

    Kalogera , B

    V. Kalogera , B. S. Sathyaprakash , M. Bailes , and et al. The Next Generation Global Gravitational Wave Observatory: The Science Book . arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:2111.06990, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  33. [41]

    L. Kasian . Timing and Precession of the Young, Relativistic Binary Pulsar PSR J1906+0746 . In C. Bassa , Z. Wang , A. Cumming , and V. M. Kaspi , editors, 40 Years of Pulsars: Millisecond Pulsars, Magnetars and More, volume 983 of American Institute of Physics Conference Seri...

    2008

  34. [42]

    M. J. Keith , M. Kramer , A. G. Lyne , R. P. Eatough , I. H. Stairs , A. Possenti , F. Camilo , and R. N. Manchester . PSR J1753-2240: a mildly recycled pulsar in an eccentric binary system . , 393 0 (2): 0 623--627, 2009

    2009

  35. [43]

    C. Kim , B. B. P. Perera , and M. A. McLaughlin . Implications of PSR J0737-3039B for the Galactic NS-NS binary merger rate . , 448 0 (1): 0 928--938, 2015

    2015

  36. [44]

    A. E. Koloniari , E. C. Koursoumpa , P. Nousi , P. Lampropoulos , N. Passalis , A. Tefas , and N. Stergioulas . New gravitational wave discoveries enabled by machine learning . Machine Learning: Science and Technology, 6 0 (1): 0 015054, 2025

    2025

  37. [45]

    Kramer , I

    M. Kramer , I. H. Stairs , R. N. Manchester , and et al. Tests of General Relativity from Timing the Double Pulsar . Science, 314 0 (5796): 0 97--102, 2006

    2006

  38. [46]

    Kramer , I

    M. Kramer , I. H. Stairs , R. N. Manchester , and et al. Strong-Field Gravity Tests with the Double Pulsar . Physical Review X, 11 0 (4): 0 041050, 2021

    2021

  39. [47]

    Kramer, I

    M. Kramer, I. H. Stairs, R. N. Manchester, and et al. Strong-field gravity tests with the double pulsar. Phys. Rev. X, 11: 0 041050, 2021

    2021

  40. [48]

    M. U. Kruckow , T. M. Tauris , N. Langer , M. Kramer , and R. G. Izzard . Progenitors of gravitational wave mergers: binary evolution with the stellar grid-based code COMBINE . , 481 0 (2): 0 1908--1949, 2018

    1908

  41. [49]

    P. D. Lasky. Gravitational waves from neutron stars: A review. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 32: 0 e034, 2015

    2015

  42. [50]

    Lazarus , P

    P. Lazarus , P. C. C. Freire , B. Allen , and et al. Einstein@Home Discovery of a Double Neutron Star Binary in the PALFA Survey . , 831 0 (2): 0 150, 2016

    2016

  43. [51]

    X. D. Li , I. Bombaci , M. Dey , J. Dey , and E. P. J. van den Heuvel . Is SAX J1808.4-3658 a Strange Star? , 83 0 (19): 0 3776--3779, 1999

    1999

  44. [52]

    R. S. Lynch , J. K. Swiggum , V. I. Kondratiev , and et al. The Green Bank North Celestial Cap Pulsar Survey. III. 45 New Pulsar Timing Solutions . , 859 0 (2): 0 93, 2018

    2018

  45. [53]

    A. G. Lyne , M. Burgay , M. Kramer , and et al. A Double-Pulsar System: A Rare Laboratory for Relativistic Gravity and Plasma Physics . Science, 303 0 (5661): 0 1153--1157, 2004

    2004

  46. [54]

    R. N. Manchester , G. B. Hobbs , A. Teoh , and M. Hobbs . The Australia Telescope National Facility Pulsar Catalogue . , 129 0 (4): 0 1993--2006, 2005

    1993

  47. [55]

    M. K. Mardini , N. Ershiadat , M. A. Al-Wardat , A. A. Taani , S. \"O zdemir , H. Al-Naimiy , and A. Khasawneh . The Nucleosynthesis and Reaction Rates of Fluorine 19 ( ^ 19 F) in the Sun . In Journal of Physics Conference Series, volume 1258 of Journal of Physics Conference S...

    2019

  48. [56]

    M. K. Mardini , H. Li , V. M. Placco , S. Alexeeva , D. Carollo , A. Taani , I. Ablimit , L. Wang , and G. Zhao . Metal-poor Stars Observed with the Automated Planet Finder Telescope. I. Discovery of Five Carbon-enhanced Metal-poor Stars from LAMOST . , 0 (2): 0 89, Apr 2019 b

    2019

  49. [57]

    M. K. Mardini , V. M. Placco , A. Taani , H. Li , and G. Zhao . Metal-poor Stars Observed with the Automated Planet Finder Telescope. II. Chemodynamical Analysis of Six Low-metallicity Stars in the Halo System of the Milky Way . , 0 (1): 0 27, Sep 2019 c

    2019

  50. [58]

    M. K. Mardini , V. M. Placco , and et al. Cosmological Insights into the Early Accretion of r-process-enhanced Stars. I. A Comprehensive Chemodynamical Analysis of LAMOST J1109+0754 . , 903 0 (2): 0 88, 2020

    2020

  51. [59]

    J. G. Martinez , K. Stovall , P. C. C. Freire , and et al. Pulsar J0453+1559: A Double Neutron Star System with a Large Mass Asymmetry . , 812 0 (2): 0 143, 2015

    2015

  52. [60]

    J. G. Martinez , K. Stovall , P. C. C. Freire , and et al. Pulsar J1411+2551: A Low-mass Double Neutron Star System . , 851 0 (2): 0 L29, 2017

    2017

  53. [61]

    S. G. Masda , J. A. Docobo , A. M. Hussein , M. K. Mardini , H. A. Al-Ameryeen , P. P. Campo , A. R. Khan , and J. M. Pathan . Physical and Dynamical Parameters of the Triple Stellar System: HIP 109951 . Astrophysical Bulletin, 74 0 (4): 0 464--474, 2019

    2019

  54. [62]

    McClelland , H

    D. McClelland , H. Lueck , R. Adhikari , and et al. 3G R&D: R&D for the Next Generation of Ground-based Gravitational-wave Detectors . arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:2111.06991, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  55. [63]

    M. C. Miller and N. Yunes . The new frontier of gravitational waves . , 568 0 (7753): 0 469--476, 2019

    2019

  56. [64]

    Miyaji , K

    S. Miyaji , K. Nomoto , K. Yokoi , and D. Sugimoto . Supernova triggered by electron captures. , 32: 0 303--329, 1980

    1980

  57. [65]

    C. Ng , D. J. Champion , M. Bailes , and et al. The High Time Resolution Universe Pulsar Survey - XII. Galactic plane acceleration search and the discovery of 60 pulsars . , 450 0 (3): 0 2922--2947, 2015

    2015

  58. [66]

    A. H. Nitz , S. Kumar , Y.-F. Wang , S. Kastha , S. Wu , M. Sch \"a fer , R. Dhurkunde , and C. D. Capano . 4-OGC: Catalog of Gravitational Waves from Compact Binary Mergers . , 946 0 (2): 0 59, 2023

    2023

  59. [67]

    K. Nomoto . Evolution of 8--10 M _ sun Stars toward Electron Capture Supernovae. II. Collapse of an O + NE + MG Core . , 322: 0 206, 1987

    1987

  60. [68]

    \"O zel and P

    F. \"O zel and P. Freire . Masses, Radii, and the Equation of State of Neutron Stars . , 54: 0 401--440, 2016

    2016

  61. [69]

    P. V. Padmanabh , E. D. Barr , S. S. Sridhar , and et al. The MPIfR-MeerKAT Galactic Plane Survey - I. System set-up and early results . , 524 0 (1): 0 1291--1315, 2023

    2023

  62. [70]

    Y. Y. Pan , L. M. Song , C. M. Zhang , and Y. Q. Guo . The simulation of the magnetic field and spin period evolution of accreting neutron stars . Astronomische Nachrichten, 336 0 (4): 0 370--377, 2015

    2015

  63. [71]

    E. S. Phinney and S. R. Kulkarni . Binary and Millisecond Pulsars . , 32: 0 591--639, 1994

    1994

  64. [72]

    Podsiadlowski , N

    P. Podsiadlowski , N. Langer , A. J. T. Poelarends , S. Rappaport , A. Heger , and E. Pfahl . The Effects of Binary Evolution on the Dynamics of Core Collapse and Neutron Star Kicks . , 612 0 (2): 0 1044--1051, 2004

    2004

  65. [73]

    Podsiadlowski , J

    P. Podsiadlowski , J. D. M. Dewi , P. Lesaffre , J. C. Miller , W. G. Newton , and J. R. Stone . The double pulsar J0737-3039: testing the neutron star equation of state . , 361 0 (4): 0 1243--1249, 2005

    2005

  66. [74]

    Sengar , V

    R. Sengar , V. Balakrishnan , and et al. The High Time Resolution Universe Pulsar Survey - XVII. PSR J1325-6253, a low eccentricity double neutron star system from an ultra-stripped supernova . , 512 0 (4): 0 5782--5792, 2022

    2022

  67. [75]

    Shao and X.-D

    Y. Shao and X.-D. Li . On the Role of Supernova Kicks in the Formation of Galactic Double Neutron Star Systems . , 867 0 (2): 0 124, 2018

    2018

  68. [76]

    B. J. Shappee , J. D. Simon , M. R. Drout , and et al. Early spectra of the gravitational wave source GW170817: Evolution of a neutron star merger . Science, 358 0 (6370): 0 1574--1578, 2017

    2017

  69. [77]

    I. H. Stairs , S. E. Thorsett , R. J. Dewey , M. Kramer , and C. A. McPhee . The formation of the double pulsar PSR J0737-3039A/B . , 373 0 (1): 0 L50--L54, 2006

    2006

  70. [78]

    Stovall , P

    K. Stovall , P. C. C. Freire , S. Chatterjee , and et al. PALFA Discovery of a Highly Relativistic Double Neutron Star Binary . , 854 0 (2): 0 L22, 2018

    2018

  71. [79]

    W. Q. Su , J. L. Han , and Z. L. e. a. Yang . The FAST Galactic Plane Pulsar Snapshot Survey - V. PSR J1901+0658 in a double neutron star system . , 530 0 (2): 0 1506--1511, 2024

    2024

  72. [80]

    J. K. Swiggum , R. Rosen , M. A. McLaughlin , and et al. PSR J1930-1852: a Pulsar in the Widest Known Orbit around Another Neutron Star . , 805 0 (2): 0 156, 2015

    2015

  73. [81]

    J. K. Swiggum , Z. Pleunis , E. Parent , and et al. The Green Bank North Celestial Cap Survey. VII. 12 New Pulsar Timing Solutions . , 944 0 (2): 0 154, 2023

    2023

  74. [82]

    A. Taani . Systematic comparison of initial velocities for neutron stars in different models . Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 16 0 (7): 0 101, 2016

    2016

  75. [83]

    A. Taani . Characterizing the Regular Orbits of Binary Pulsars: An Initial Prospection Study . Galaxies, 11 0 (2): 0 44, 2023

    2023

  76. [84]

    Taani and A

    A. Taani and A. Khasawneh . Probing the accretion induced collapse of white dwarfs in millisecond pulsars . In Journal of Physics Conference Series, volume 869 of Journal of Physics Conference Series, page 012090, 2017

    2017

  77. [85]

    Taani and J

    A. Taani and J. C. Vallejo . Dynamical Monte Carlo Simulations of 3-D Galactic Systems in Axisymmetric and Triaxial Potentials . , 34: 0 e024, 2017

    2017

  78. [86]

    Taani , L

    A. Taani , L. Naso , Y. Wei , C. Zhang , and Y. Zhao . Modeling the spatial distribution of neutron stars in the Galaxy . , 341 0 (2): 0 601--609, 2012 a

    2012

  79. [87]

    Taani , C

    A. Taani , C. Zhang , M. Al-Wardat , and Y. Zhao . Investigation of some physical properties of accretion induced collapse in producing millisecond pulsars . , 340 0 (1): 0 147--153, 2012 b

    2012

  80. [88]

    Taani , S

    A. Taani , S. Karino , L. Song , C. Zhang , and S. Chaty . Determination of wind-fed model parameters of neutron stars in high-mass X-ray binaries . , 39: 0 e040, 2022 a

    2022

  81. [89]

    Taani , J

    A. Taani , J. C. Vallejo , and M. Abu-Saleem . Assessing the complexity of orbital parameters after asymmetric kick in binary pulsars . Journal of High Energy Astrophysics, 35: 0 83--90, 2022 b

    2022

  82. [90]

    T. M. Tauris and E. P. J. van den Heuvel . Physics of Binary Star Evolution. From Stars to X-ray Binaries and Gravitational Wave Sources . 2023

    2023

  83. [91]

    T. M. Tauris and E. P. J. van den Heuvel. Physics of binary star evolution -- from stars to x-ray binaries and gravitational wave sources, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.09388

    2023 arXiv

  84. [92]

    T. M. Tauris , N. Langer , and P. Podsiadlowski . Ultra-stripped supernovae: progenitors and fate . , 451 0 (2): 0 2123--2144, 2015

    2015

  85. [93]

    T. M. Tauris , M. Kramer , P. C. C. Freire , and et al. Formation of Double Neutron Star Systems . , 0 (2): 0 170, Sept. 2017

    2017

  86. [94]

    E. P. J. van den Heuvel . Scenarios for the formation of binary and millisecond pulsars - A critical assessment. Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 16: 0 255--288, 1995

    1995

  87. [95]

    E. P. J. van den Heuvel . Double Neutron Stars: Evidence For Two Different Neutron-Star Formation Mechanisms . In T. di Salvo , G. L. Israel , L. Piersant , L. Burderi , G. Matt , A. Tornambe , and M. T. Menna , editors, The Multicolored Landscape of Compact Objects and Their ...

    2007

  88. [96]

    E. P. J. van den Heuvel . High space velocities of single radio pulsars versus low orbital eccentricities and masses of double neutron stars: Evidence for two different neutron star formation mechanisms . , 54 0 (3-6): 0 140--144, 2010

    2010

  89. [97]

    E. P. J. van den Heuvel . Formation of Double Neutron Stars, Millisecond Pulsars and Double Black Holes . Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 38 0 (3): 0 45, 2017

    2017

  90. [98]

    M. P. van Haarlem , M. W. Wise , A. W. Gunst , and et al. LOFAR: The LOw-Frequency ARray . , 556: 0 A2, 2013

    2013

  91. [99]

    van Leeuwen , L

    J. van Leeuwen , L. Kasian , I. H. Stairs , and et al. The Binary Companion of Young, Relativistic Pulsar J1906+0746 . , 798 0 (2): 0 118, 2015

    2015

  92. [100]

    Wang , D

    C. Wang , D. Lai , and J. L. Han . Neutron Star Kicks in Isolated and Binary Pulsars: Observational Constraints and Implications for Kick Mechanisms . , 639 0 (2): 0 1007--1017, 2006

    2006

  93. [101]

    J. M. Weisberg and Y. Huang . Relativistic Measurements from Timing the Binary Pulsar PSR B1913+16 . , 829 0 (1): 0 55, 2016

    2016

  94. [102]

    J. M. Weisberg , D. J. Nice , and J. H. Taylor . Timing Measurements of the Relativistic Binary Pulsar PSR B1913+16 . , 722 0 (2): 0 1030--1034, 2010

    2010

  95. [103]

    N. Wex . Neutron Stars as Probes for General Relativity and Gravitational Waves . In A. W. Alsabti and P. Murdin , editors, Handbook of Supernovae, page 1447. Springer International Publishing, 2017

    2017

  96. [104]

    Wong , B

    T.-W. Wong , B. Willems , and V. Kalogera . Constraints on Natal Kicks in Galactic Double Neutron Star Systems . , 721 0 (2): 0 1689--1701, 2010

    2010

  97. [105]

    Q. D. Wu , N. Wang , J. P. Yuan , and et al. PSR J2150+3427: A Possible Double Neutron Star System . , 958 0 (1): 0 L17, 2023

    2023

  98. [106]

    Yang , L

    Y.-Y. Yang , L. Chen , R.-F. Linghu , L.-Y. Zhang , and A. Taani . Constraints on Estimation of Radius of Double Pulsar PSR J0737-3039A and Its Neutron Star Nuclear Matter Composition . Chinese Physics Letters, 34 0 (12): 0 129701, 2017 a

    2017

  99. [107]

    Yang , C.-M

    Y.-Y. Yang , C.-M. Zhang , D. Li , D.-H. Wang , Y.-Y. Pan , R.-F. Lingfu , and Z.-W. Zhou . Similarity of PSR J1906+0746 TO PSR J0737-3039: A Candidate of a New Double Pulsar System? , 835 0 (2): 0 185, 2017 b

    2017

  100. [108]

    S. Zha , E. P. O'Connor , S. M. Couch , S.-C. Leung , and K. Nomoto . Hydrodynamic simulations of electron-capture supernovae: progenitor and dimension dependence . , 513 0 (1): 0 1317--1328, 2022

    2022

  101. [109]

    C. M. Zhang and Y. Kojima . The bottom magnetic field and magnetosphere evolution of neutron star in low-mass X-ray binary . , 366 0 (1): 0 137--143, 2006

    2006

  102. [110]

    C. M. Zhang , J. Wang , Y. H. Zhao , H. X. Yin , L. M. Song , D. P. Menezes , D. T. Wickramasinghe , L. Ferrario , and P. Chardonnet . Study of measured pulsar masses and their possible conclusions . , 527: 0 A83, 2011

    2011

  103. [111]

    Zhu and G

    X.-J. Zhu and G. Ashton . Characterizing Astrophysical Binary Neutron Stars with Gravitational Waves . , 902 0 (1): 0 L12, 2020

    2020

  104. [112]

    Study of measured pulsar masses and their possible conclusions

    John A. R. \ (2006), Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis, Third Edition, Duxbury Advanced @ARTICLE 2011A&A...527A..83Z, author = Zhang , C. M. and Wang , J. and Zhao , Y. H. and Yin , H. X. and Song , L. M. and Menezes , D. P. and Wickramasinghe , D. T. and Ferrario , L....

    2006 arXiv

  105. [113]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archive author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution journal key keywords month note number organization pages publisher school series title type url volume year archivePrefix primaryClass adsurl adsnote version label extra.labe...

  106. [114]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION add.period duplicate empty 'skip "." * add.blank if FUNCTION if.digit duplicate "0" = swap duplicate "1" = swap duplicate "2" = swap duplicate "3" = swap duplicate "4" = swap duplicate "5" = swap duplicate "6" = swap dupl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.