Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 74 references

Discrete dynamical systems: inverse problems and related topics

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read The Boundary Control method extends to discrete systems: the response operator of a discrete wave equation is complete inverse data, giving Jacobi matrices, moments, Toda lattices, de Branges spaces, Weyl functions, Krein strings.

desk verdict Useful and honest review of the BC method for discrete inverse problems, but the printed b_k factorization formula (2.20) has a sign error, so Section 2.4 needs correction before publication. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.05161 v1 pith:O4TCP5XN submitted 2025-05-08 math.AP math.SP

classification math.APmath.SP MSC 35R3039A1247B3634A5547A57
keywords BoundaryControlmethoddiscretedynamicalsystemsJacobimatricesmomentproblemsTodalatticesdeBrangesspacesWeylfunctionsKrein-Stieltjesstrings
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that the Boundary Control method, developed for continuous wave equations, carries over to discrete dynamical systems. The central object is a Jacobi matrix paired with a discrete wave equation driven by a boundary control; the measured response operator is shown to contain all information needed to reconstruct the matrix. From that reconstruction the authors obtain solutions to classical moment problems, Toda lattices, Weyl functions, de Branges spaces, and Krein-Stieltjes strings, as well as numerical schemes. If the approach is correct, it turns a broad family of inverse problems into explicit algebraic procedures based on the connecting operator.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the connecting operator $C_T = (W^T)^* W^T$, where $W^T$ maps boundary controls to states of the discrete system at time $T$. For the discrete wave equation (1.2), its matrix entries are determined by the response vector through (2.6), so the operator is known from inverse data alone. Krein-type equations (2.11) and factorization of $C_T$ yield the Jacobi coefficients via the determinant formulas (2.16) and (2.20). The same machinery gives spectral representations in Chebyshev polynomials, the moment-to-response change of basis (3.20), and a generating-function formula for Weyl functions.

What would settle it

Take a vector $(r_0,\dots,r_{2T-2})$ whose $C_T$ is positive definite, run the factorization formulas (2.16) and (2.20) to obtain coefficients, simulate the forward system (1.2), and compare the computed response vector to the input; any mismatch would disprove the characterization. In particular, one can search for a positive-definite $C_T$ for which the recovered coefficients are not real or do not reproduce the given response.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the dynamic inverse problem for a discrete hyperbolic system is well posed: from the response operator $R_{2n}$ of system (1.2), one can recover the Jacobi coefficients $\{a_0,\dots,a_{n-1}\}$ and $\{b_1,\dots,b_{n-1}\}$. The mechanism is the connecting operator $C_T$, built from the response vector by (2.6); Theorem 3 characterizes genuine response vectors by positivity of $C_T$, and the factorization formulas (2.16) and (2.20) give the coefficients explicitly. The same operator, via spectral representations (3.17)-(3.19) and the moment-response relation (3.20), connects dynamics to spectral data, yielding existence and uniqueness criteria for Hamburger, Stieltjes, and Hausdorff moment problems, evolution of moments in Toda lattices, Weyl-function expansions, de Branges spaces, and Krein-Stieltjes strings.

Load-bearing premise

The reconstruction algorithms rest on the criterion that a vector is a genuine response vector exactly when the connecting matrix $C_T$ built from it is positive definite, together with the determinant formulas that recover the coefficients; the text cites this criterion to another paper rather than proving it here.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Recovering a Jacobi matrix from its response operator is reduced to linear algebra: build $C_T$ from the response vector, check positivity, and read off the coefficients from determinants.
  • Existence and uniqueness for Hamburger, Stieltjes, and Hausdorff moment problems are characterized by positivity of Hankel matrices $S_N^0$ and $S_N^1$, and indeterminacy by finiteness of certain limits involving $C_N$.
  • The Toda lattice can be solved for unbounded initial data by evolving moments of the spectral measure through formulas (4.4)-(4.5) and then reconstructing the Jacobi matrix at each time.
  • The Weyl function of a Jacobi operator is the generating function of its response vector; the same holds for finite blocks.
  • The dynamic inverse problem for finite Jacobi matrices with continuous time and for Krein-Stieltjes strings is solvable from the response function, with an explicit characterization of inverse data.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural test not pursued in the review is whether the determinant reconstruction still succeeds when $C_T$ is positive semidefinite but not definite; the theory only covers the definite case.
  • The response-vector representation of the Weyl function suggests numerical algorithms that estimate moments from boundary measurements without first reconstructing the matrix.
  • The corrected-response convergence result for point-mass strings indicates that choosing the discrete observable that matches the continuous one is essential; a similar correction may be needed in other discretizations.
  • The complex-Jacobi result that only squares $a_k^2$ are recoverable hints at gauge freedom in non-self-adjoint discrete inverse problems beyond the usual sign choice.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review of the authors' program extending the Boundary Control method to inverse problems for discrete dynamical systems generated by Jacobi matrices. After introducing the discrete wave equation (1.2) and the response operator, the paper presents the connecting operator C_T, Krein-type equations, and a factorization method for recovering the Jacobi coefficients from response data. It then applies the discrete BC machinery to classical (Hamburger, Stieltjes, Hausdorff) moment problems, to finite and semi-infinite Toda lattices, to the construction of de Branges spaces, to Weyl functions, and to continuous-time systems including Krein-Stieltjes strings. The final section discusses numerical simulations. The paper is largely a survey of the authors' previous works, with many theorems quoted without proofs.

Significance. If the formulas are corrected, the paper would provide a useful unified survey of a coherent research program: the explicit determinantal reconstruction formulas and the characterization theorem establish a dynamic-to-spectral dictionary that connects several inverse problems in one framework. The positive features include explicit algebraic formulas that can be checked by hand, a clear hierarchy of finite-dimensional truncations, and concrete approximation statements in Propositions 10-12. However, the central factorization algorithm in Section 2.4 contains sign errors and a dimension mismatch that affect later sections, so the paper in its present form does not correctly demonstrate the central reconstruction claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.4, Eqs. (2.19)-(2.20)]
  2. [Section 2.4, Eq. (2.17)]
  3. [Sections 3 and 4]
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 2.1-2.2]
  2. [Section 7.2, Eq. (7.8)]
  3. [Section 2.5, Theorem 3]
  4. [Section 2.4, after Eq. (2.12)]
  5. [Section 3.1, Eq. (3.1)]
  6. [Throughout]

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity found; the paper's reconstructions are derived from the discrete dynamics, and self-citations are to prior published proofs rather than to the claims being established.

full rationale

The central reconstruction chain in Section 2 is derived in the text from the discrete wave equation: Lemma 1 gives the Goursat representation, Theorem 1 expresses the connecting operator C_T in terms of the response vector r, and the factorization argument yields q_{k,k} = (det C_k / det C_{k-1})^{-1/2}, hence (2.16) for a_k, and equating (2.18) with (2.19) gives (2.20) for b_k. These are exact algebraic identities that solve for the unknown Jacobi coefficients from the response data; the coefficients are not defined in terms of the data by construction. The later sections reduce moment problems, Toda lattices, de Branges spaces, Weyl functions, and Krein strings to this same inverse problem through explicit spectral representations such as (3.18), (3.20), (4.4), and Theorem 14. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no target result is assumed as a hypothesis. The heavy self-citation is a review-style choice: characterizations such as Theorem 3 and Theorems 7-9 are quoted from the authors' earlier papers [42,44] with proofs not reproduced. Under the stated rules, a cited result is independent support when it is proven in prior work and is externally falsifiable; the fact that the authors overlap does not by itself make the derivation circular. The omitted proof of Theorem 3 is flagged: the text says 'The proof is given in [42, Theorem 3.2]', which is a missing proof in the present manuscript, but it is a legitimate citation to prior published work, not a circular dependence. For completeness, the printed (2.19)-(2.20) appears to have a sign inconsistency with the preceding derivation, which is a correctness defect rather than a circularity and does not affect this score.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper is a review that relies on classical spectral theory and the authors' own prior results. The only hand-picked constant found is R=3B+1 in Theorem 14. The main axioms are the weak convergence of spectral measures and the semibounded-support restriction for the Toda construction, both explicitly invoked. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • R (domain radius constant) = 3B+1, where B = sup_n {|a_n|, |b_n|}
    Introduced by hand in Theorem 14 to define the domain D in which the Weyl-function representation holds. It is a sufficient-condition constant, not fitted to data, but it is a chosen parameter that affects the stated result.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Spectral measures dρ_N of finite Jacobi blocks converge weakly to a spectral measure dρ_{α*} of a self-adjoint extension of A (Section 3.2.2, after (3.14)).
    Used to derive the spectral representations in Propositions 3 and 9 and hence the moment problem equivalences.
  • ad hoc to paper The initial spectral measure in the Toda lattice construction has semibounded support above, supp{dρ^0_{α*}} subset (-∞, M) for some M (Proposition 9).
    Explicitly restricts the class of unbounded initial data; without it the limiting moments in (4.4) may not be defined.
  • standard math Standard spectral theory of Jacobi operators, including limit point/circle classification and Weyl m-functions (Section 3.2.2, Section 6).
    Background results from [1,65,68] are used without proof.
  • standard math The reproducing kernel theory of de Branges spaces, including the characterization theorem (Theorem 10, quoted from [27,26]).
    Used in Section 5 to identify the constructed Hilbert spaces as de Branges spaces.
invented entities (1)
  • Infinite connecting operator C
    purpose: Formally defined in Section 5.3 as the semi-infinite analog of C_T; used to define the candidate infinite-dimensional de Branges space B^∞_A and to discuss closability of its quadratic form.
    The matrix C is only formally defined and its role is conjectural ('We suggest that matrix C should play the same role...'); no independent verification or application outside the authors' framework is provided in this review.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Discrete dynamical systems: inverse problems and related topics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/O4TCP5XN

@misc{pith2026250505161,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Discrete dynamical systems: inverse problems and related topics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/O4TCP5XN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.05161}
}
read the original abstract

In this review, we extend the Boundary Control method\, -- \,an approach to inverse problems based on control theory for dynamical systems \, -- \,to inverse problems for discrete dynamical systems. We apply our results to classical moment problems, Toda lattices, Weyl functions, de Branges spaces, Krein-Stieltjes strings, and also to problems of numerical simulations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.05161 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Discrete wave equation. Additionally, we assume that the time t is also discrete. In other words, we replace the interval (0, T ) with the set of discrete points: t0 < t1 < · · · < tT . For simplicity, we can consider it as a sequence of numbers: 0 < 1 < . . . < T . The space of real square summable functions on the graph ΩD is denoted by L(ΩD) := LN i=1 R Ni . For the function u ∈ L(ΩD) we write u :=  u i N i=1 , … view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [39]

    A. S. Mikhaylov, V. S Mikhaylov . Dynamical inverse problem for the discrete Schr¨ odinger operator. Nanosystems: Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics, 7, no. 5, 842-854, 2016

  2. [61]

    Mikhaylov, V.S

    A.S. Mikhaylov, V.S. Mikhaylov, M.A. Shishlenin, Inve rse dynamic problem for parabolic equation on finite interval. in progress, 2024

  3. [1]

    Akhiezer

    N.I. Akhiezer. The classical moment problem. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh. 1965

  4. [2]

    Avdonin, M.I

    S.A. Avdonin, M.I. Belishev, Boundary control and the dy namic inverse problem for a non- selfadjoint Sturm-Liouville operator, Control and Cybernetics , Vol. 25(3), pp. 429–440, 1996

  5. [3]

    S. A. Avdonin, M.I. Belishev, Yu.S. Rozhkov The BC-metho d in the inverse problem for the heat equation. J.Inv. Ill-Posed Problems, 5, no. 4, pp. 309, 317–330, 1997, DOI: 10.1515/jiip.1997.5.4.309 DISCRETE DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS 43

  6. [4]

    S. A. Avdonin and P. B. Kurasov, Inverse problems for quan tum trees, Inverse Problems and Imaging. 2 (2008), no. 1, 1–21

  7. [5]

    S. A. Avdonin, V. S. Mikhaylov. The boundary control appr oach to inverse spectral theory. Inverse Problems, 26, no. 4, 2010, 045009, 19 pp

  8. [6]

    Avdonin, A.S

    S.A. Avdonin, A.S. Mikhaylov, V.S Mikhaylov On some appl ications of the Boundary Con- trol method to spectral estimation and inverse problems. Nanosystems: Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics Vol. 6, no. 1, 63 - 78, 2015

Show all 74 references
  1. [7]

    S. A. Avdonin, A. S. Mikhaylov, V. S. Mikhaylov, J. Park, I nverse Problem for the Schr¨ odinger Equation with Non-self-adjoint Matrix Potential. Inverse Problems. Inverse Problems , 37, no. 3, 035002, 2021

  2. [8]

    S. A. Avdonin, V. S. Mikhaylov, K. B. Nurtazina. On invers e dynamical and spectral problems for the wave and Schr¨ odinger equations on finite trees. The l eaf peeling method. J. Math. Sci. (N.Y.) 224, no. 1, 1-10, 2017

  3. [9]

    S. A. Avdonin, V. S. Mikhaylov and A. V. Rybkin. The bounda ry control approach to the Titchmarsh-W eylm− function. Comm. Math. Phys. 275, no. 3, 2007, 791–803

  4. [10]

    S. A. Avdonin, A. Choke, A.S. Mikhaylov, V. S. Mikhaylov . Discretization of the wave equa- tion on a metric graph, to appear in Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences , 2024

  5. [11]

    F. V. Atkinson. Discrete and Continuous Boundary Problems. New York/London, Academic Press. 1964

  6. [12]

    On an approach to multidimensional inverse problems for the wave equation

    M.I.Belishev. On an approach to multidimensional inverse problems for the wave equation. Soviet Mathematics. Doklady , 36, no 3, 481–484, 1988

  7. [13]

    M. I. Belishev. Boundary control in reconstruction of manifolds and metric s (the BC method). Inverse Problems , 13, no 5, R1–R45, 1997

  8. [14]

    M. I. Belishev. Boundary control and inverse problems: a one-dimensional v ersion of the boundary control method. Zap. Nauchn. Sem. S.-Peterburg. Otdel. Mat. Inst. Steklov. (POMI), 354, 19-80, 2008 (in Russian); English translation: J. Math. Sci. (N. Y.), 155, no 3, 343–378, 2008

  9. [15]

    Belishev

    M.I. Belishev. On relations between spectral and dynamical inverse data, J . Inverse Ill-Posed Probl. 9, no. 6, 547–565, 2001

  10. [16]

    I.Belishev

    M. I.Belishev. Recent progress in the boundary control method. Inverse Problems , 23, no 5, R1–R67, 2007

  11. [17]

    Boundary control and tomography of Riem annian manifolds (the BC-method)

    M.I.Belishev. Boundary control and tomography of Riem annian manifolds (the BC-method). Uspekhi Matem. Nauk, 72, no 4, 3–66, 2017 (in Russian)

  12. [18]

    Belishev, Boundary spectral inverse problem on a c lass of graphs (trees) by the BC method, Inverse Problems, 20, 647–672, 2004

    M.I. Belishev, Boundary spectral inverse problem on a c lass of graphs (trees) by the BC method, Inverse Problems, 20, 647–672, 2004

  13. [19]

    Belishev, A.F

    M.I. Belishev, A.F. Vakulenko, Inverse problems on gra phs: recovering the tree of strings by the BC-method, J. Inv. Ill-Posed Problems , 14, 29–46, 2006

  14. [20]

    Belishev, T.Sh

    M.I. Belishev, T.Sh. Khabibullin, Characterization o f data in dynamical inverse problem for the 1d wave equation with matrix potential, Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI, 493, 48–72, 2020

  15. [21]

    Unified approach to cl assical equations of inverse problem theory

    M.I.Belishev and V.S.Mikhaylov. Unified approach to cl assical equations of inverse problem theory. Journal of Inverse and Ill-Posed Problems , 20, no 4, 461–488, 2012

  16. [22]

    Small eigenvalues of lar ge Hankel matrices: The indetermi- nate case

    Berg C., Chen Y., Ismail M.E.H. Small eigenvalues of lar ge Hankel matrices: The indetermi- nate case. Mathematica Scandinavica, 91, 67–81, 2002

  17. [23]

    Closable Hankel Operators and Moment Problems

    Berg C., Szwarc R. Closable Hankel Operators and Moment Problems. Integral Equations and Operator Theory. 92, no. 1, 2020

  18. [24]

    A. S. Blagoveschenskii. On a local approach to the solut ion of the dynamical inverse problem for an inhomogeneous string. Trudy MIAN, 115, 1971, 28–38, 1971(in Russian)

  19. [25]

    Inverse Problems of W ave Proc esses

    A.S.Blagovestchenskii. Inverse Problems of W ave Proc esses. VSP, Netherlands , 2001

  20. [26]

    Hilbert space of entire functions

    Louis de Branges . Hilbert space of entire functions. Prentice-Hall, NJ. 1968

  21. [27]

    H Dym, H. P. McKean . Gaussian processes, function theory, and the inverse spec tral prob- lem. Academic Press, New York etc. 1976

  22. [28]

    Gesztesy, B

    F. Gesztesy, B. Simon. m− functions and inverse spectral analysis for finite and semi- infinite Jacobi matrices, J. d’Analyse Math. 73, 267-297, 1997

  23. [29]

    Ifantis, K.N

    E.K. Ifantis, K.N. Vlachou. Solution of the Semi-Infini te Toda Lattice for Unbounded Se- quences, Letters in Mathematical Physics, 59, 1–17, 2002

  24. [30]

    Ifantis, K.N

    E.K. Ifantis, K.N. Vlachou. Exact solutions of the semi -infinite Toda lattice with applications to the inverse spectral problem, Abstract and Applied Analysis, 5, 435–451, 2004. 44 ALEXANDER MIKHAYLOV AND VICTOR MIKHAYLOV

  25. [31]

    Kabanikhin, Inverse and Ill-Posed Problems

    S.I. Kabanikhin, Inverse and Ill-Posed Problems. Theo ry and Applications. De Gruyter, Ger- many, 2011

  26. [32]

    Kabanikhin, M.A

    S.I. Kabanikhin, M.A. Shishlenin. Comparative Analys is of boundary control and Gel’fand- Levitan methods of solving inverse acoustic problem, Inverse Problems in Engineering Me- chanics IV, Proceedings of International Symposium on Inve rse Problems in Engineering Mechanics (...

  27. [33]

    Kabanikhin, M.A

    S.I. Kabanikhin, M.A. Shishlenin. Boundary control an d Gelfand-Levitan-Krein methods in inverse acoustic problem, Journal of Inverse Ill-Posed Problem , 12, no. 2, 125–144, 2004

  28. [34]

    Kachalov, Ya

    A. Kachalov, Ya. V. Kurylev and M. Lassas. Inverse Boundary Spectral Problems Chapman Hall/CRC: Boca Raton FL, 2001

  29. [35]

    M. G. Krein. On the transfer function of a one-dimensional boundary prob lem of the second order. Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR (N.S.), 88, 1953, 405–408, (in Russian)

  30. [36]

    M. G. Krein. On the one method of effective solving the inv erse boundary value problem Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR , 94, no. 6, 987–990, 1954, (in Russian)

  31. [37]

    Kac, M.G

    I.S. Kac, M.G. Krein. On the spectral functions of the st ring, Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. Ser. 2, 103, 19–102, 1974. http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/trans2/10 3

  32. [38]

    P. Kurasov. Spectral geometry of graphs, Operator Theo ry: Advances and Applications, Birkha´ user, Berlin, Germany,2024

  33. [40]

    A. S. Mikhaylov, V. S Mikhaylov . Relationship between different types of inverse data for the one-dimensional Schr¨ odinger operator on a half-li ne. Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI, 451, 134-155, 2016

  34. [41]

    Mikhaylov, V.S

    A.S. Mikhaylov, V.S. Mikhaylov. Boundary Control method and de Branges spaces. Schr¨ odinger operator, Dirac system, discrete Schr¨ odinger operator. Journal of Mathemat- ical Analysis and Applications, 460, no. 2, 927-953, 2018

  35. [42]

    A. S. Mikhaylov, V. S. Mikhaylov. Dynamic inverse problem for Jacobi matrices. Inverse Problems and Imaging, 13, no. 3, 431-447, 2019

  36. [43]

    A. S. Mikhaylov, V. S. Mikhaylov. On application of the Boundary control method to classical moment problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2092 (2021) 012002 IO P Publishing doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2092/1/012002

  37. [44]

    A. S. Mikhaylov, V. S. Mikhaylov. Inverse problem for dy namical system associated with Jacobi matrices and classical moment problems. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Ap- plications, 487, no. 1, 123970, 2020

  38. [45]

    A. S. Mikhaylov, V. S. Mikhaylov, S.A. Simonov. On the re lationship between W eyl functions of Jacobi matrices and response vectors for special dynamic al systems with discrete time, Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences. 41, no. 16, 6401-6408, 2018

  39. [46]

    A. S. Mikhaylov, V. S. Mikhaylov, Dynamic inverse probl em for a Krein–Stieltjes string. Applied Mathematics Letters, 96, 195–210, 2019,

  40. [47]

    A. S. Mikhaylov, V. S. Mikhaylov, Forward and inverse dy namic problems for a Krein string. Approximation by point-mass densities, IEEE Proceedings of Days on Diffraction, 125–131, 2019

  41. [48]

    A. S. Mikhaylov, V. S. Mikhaylov, Forward and inverse pr oblems for finite Krein-Stieltjes string. Approximation of constant density by point masses. Zapiski Nauchnih Seminarov POMI, 483, 128-142, 2019. Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 252, no. 5, 654–653, 2021

  42. [49]

    A. S. Mikhaylov, V. S. Mikhaylov, Finite Toda lattice an d classical moment problem. Nanosystems: Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics, 11, no 1, 25–29, 2020

  43. [50]

    A. S. Mikhaylov, V. S. Mikhaylov, Solution of Toda latti ces for semi-bounded initial data. IEEE Proceedings of Days on Diffraction ’2020, 85-88, 2020

  44. [51]

    A. S. Mikhaylov, V. S. Mikhaylov, Inverse dynamic probl em for finite Jacobi matrices. Journal of Inverse and Ill-Posed problems, 29, no. 4, 611-628, 2021

  45. [52]

    A. S. Mikhaylov, V. S. Mikhaylov, Hilbert spaces of func tions associated with Jacobi matrices. IEEE Proceedings of Days on Diffraction ’2021 , 10.1109/DD52349.2021.9598751, 2021

  46. [53]

    A. S. Mikhaylov, V. S. Mikhaylov, On the construction of de Branges spaces for dynamical systems associated with finite Jacobi matrices. Nanosystems: Physics, Chemistry, Mathe- matics, 13, no. 1, 24–29, 2022

  47. [54]

    A. S. Mikhaylov, V. S. Mikhaylov, Construction of solut ions of Toda lattices by the classical moment problem. Journal of Mathematical Sciences , 283, 573–585, 2024. DISCRETE DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS 45

  48. [55]

    A. S. Mikhaylov, V. S. Mikhaylov, Dynamic inverse probl em for complex Jacobi matrices. Zapiski Nauchnih Seminarov POMI, 521, 136–154, 2023

  49. [56]

    Mikhaylov, V.S

    A.S. Mikhaylov, V.S. Mikhaylov. Dynamic inverse probl em for complex Jacobi matrices. IEEE Proceedings of Days on Diffraction ’2023. 10.1109/DD58728.2023.10325752

  50. [57]

    A. S. Mikhaylov, V. S. Mikhaylov. On the relationships b etween hyperbolic and parabolic inverse discrete problems. to appear in Journal of Applied a nd Industrial Mathematics. 2024

  51. [58]

    A. S. Mikhaylov, V. S. Mikhaylov, Inverse problem for se mi-infinite Jacobi matrices and associated Hilbert spaces of analytic functions, to appear in Zapiski Nauchnih Seminarov POMI, 2024

  52. [59]

    A. S. Mikhaylov, V. S. Mikhaylov. Quantum and acoustic s cattering on R+ and one rep- resentation of a scattering matrix. IEEE Proceedings of Days on Diffraction ’2017, 237-240, 2017

  53. [60]

    Mikhaylov, V.S

    A.S. Mikhaylov, V.S. Mikhaylov. On a special Hilbert sp ace of functions associated with the multidimensional wave equation in a bounded domain. IEEE Proceedings of Days on Diffraction ’2022, 101–105, 2022

  54. [62]

    J. Moser. Finitely many mass points on the line under the influence of an exponential poten- tial – an integrable system. Dynamical Systems, Theory and Applications, Lecture Notes in Physics, 38, 67-497, 1975

  55. [63]

    R. V. Romanov. Canonical systems and de Branges spaces http://arxiv.org/abs/1408.6022

  56. [64]

    V. G. Romanov. Inverse problems of mathematical physic s. Nauka, Moscow, 1984. (in Rus- sian)

  57. [65]

    Schm¨ udgen, The moment problem

    K. Schm¨ udgen, The moment problem. Cham:Springer international publishing, 2017

  58. [66]

    B. Simon. A new approach to inverse spectral theory, I. F undamental formalism Annals of Mathematics, 150, 1029–1057, 1999

  59. [67]

    J. A. Shohat, J. D. Tamarkin, The Problem of Moments, New York: American mathematical society, 1943

  60. [68]

    Simon, The classical moment problem as a self-adjoin t finite difference operator., Advances in Math., 137, 82-203, 1998

    B. Simon, The classical moment problem as a self-adjoin t finite difference operator., Advances in Math., 137, 82-203, 1998

  61. [69]

    B. Simon. A new approach to inverse spectral theory, I. F undamental formalism., Annals of Mathematics, 150, 1029–1057, 1999

  62. [70]

    G. Teschl. Jacobi Operators and Completely Integrable Nonlinear Lattices. American Math- ematical Society, Vol. 72, 2000

  63. [71]

    M. Toda. Theory of Nonlinear Lattices. Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences, 20 (2 ed.), Berlin: Springer, 1989

  64. [72]

    Vladimirov Equations of mathematical physics

    V.S. Vladimirov Equations of mathematical physics. Th ird edition. ”Nauka”, 1976

  65. [73]

    Yafaev Unbounded Hankel Operators and Moment Proble ms, Integral Equations and Operator Theory, 85, no

    D. Yafaev Unbounded Hankel Operators and Moment Proble ms, Integral Equations and Operator Theory, 85, no. 2, 289– 301, 2016

  66. [74]

    D. Yafaev Correction to: Unbounded Hankel Operators an d Moment Problems (Integral Equations and Operator Theory, (2016), 85, 2, (289-300), 10 .1007/s00020-016-2289-y) Inte- gral Equations and Operator Theory, 91, no. 5, 2019. St. Petersburg Department of V.A. Steklov Institut...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.