Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

P-CORONA: A New Tool for Calculating the Intensity and Polarization of Coronal Lines in 3D Models of the Solar Corona

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read P-CORONA is a new open-source code that calculates the intensity and polarization of forbidden and permitted coronal lines in three-dimensional solar models, treating the Hanle and Zeeman effects consistently.

desk verdict A useful, honest code paper that deserves refereeing; the missing quantitative benchmark and a few scope overclaims are the real soft spots. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.05962 v1 pith:4M7UPDMU submitted 2025-05-09 astro-ph.SR

Supriya Hebbur Dayananda , Ángel de Vicente , Tanausú del Pino Alemán , Javier Trujillo Bueno , Nataliia G. Shchukina This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords SolarcoronamagneticfieldscoronallinesStokesparametersHanleeffectZeemanForwardmodelingDensitymatrixpolarization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

P-CORONA is a new open-source code that computes the intensity and polarization of coronal emission lines in three-dimensional models of the solar corona. It solves the statistical equilibrium equations for the multipolar components of the atomic density matrix and uses the resulting emissivities to synthesize all four Stokes parameters, including the Hanle and Zeeman effects and Doppler dimming and brightening. The paper argues that by using the general emissivity expression with magnetic splitting, the code accounts for the Zeeman effect on Stokes Q and U, not only on Stokes V, as earlier forbidden-line codes did. If correct, the community gains a single tool for forward modeling both forbidden and permitted lines in the 3D corona, with synthetic maps that can be compared with DKIST and other polarimetric observations. Applied to MURaM and Predictive Science models, the code predicts that transverse-Zeeman linear polarization in the tested forbidden lines is present but very weak, generally below current detectability.

What carries the argument

The engine is the density-matrix theory of spectral line polarization: the atomic state is represented by multipolar components $\rho^K_Q(\alpha J)$, and the statistical equilibrium equations are solved for them, with radiative rates built from radiation-field tensors that encode the anisotropy of the incident radiation, including Doppler dimming and brightening. The emissivity formula is the load-bearing identity: it couples the density matrix to the emergent Stokes parameters through 3-$j$ symbols and the magnetically split line profile, so the Zeeman effect enters Q, U, and V, not just V. Non-dipole radiative transitions are handled under the strong coupling approximation, meaning they only affect level populations, and a Hanle-saturated mode is offered for faster computations when appropriate.

What would settle it

Recompute the Stokes Q and U profiles of Si ix 39343 Å in the same active-region MURaM snapshot with a code that handles all radiative transition types in full; if the transverse-Zeeman amplitudes differ materially from P-CORONA's, the strong-coupling approximation fails for this line.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that P-CORONA correctly synthesizes Stokes I, Q, U, and V for coronal lines in 3D models by implementing the density-matrix theory of spectral line polarization in full, rather than restricting to the saturated Hanle regime or to the weak-field approximation for Stokes V. The code solves the statistical equilibrium equations for the multipolar components $\rho^K_Q$ of the atomic density matrix for a multilevel atom, then computes frequency-dependent emissivities via the general expression $\epsilon_i(\nu,\Omega)$ that retains the magnetic sublevel splitting in the Voigt and Faraday-Voigt profiles. This is what allows the Zeeman effect to enter all Stokes parameters, including the transverse-field contribution to Q and U; the paper demonstrates the effect on Fe xiii 10747 Å and Si ix 39343 Å in an active-region MURaM model, finding that the transverse Zeeman signatures are visible in the synthesized profiles but too weak for current instruments. The same implementation is applied to six forbidden lines in four MURaM snapshots and to Fe xiii 10747 Å in two large-scale Predictive Science models, and the code is released openly.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the strong-coupling approximation: any radiative transition not satisfying the dipole selection rules is assumed to change only level populations, never polarization; if such transitions do polarize the upper levels of the forbidden lines, the computed Stokes Q, U, and V maps would be systematically too small.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • P-CORONA provides synthetic Stokes I, Q, U, and V maps for forbidden and permitted coronal lines in 3D MHD models, enabling direct comparison with DKIST, UCoMP, and future coronagraphic polarimetry.
  • The full-emissivity treatment means that the Zeeman effect contributes to linear polarization (Q and U) as well as circular polarization (V), so the code can be used to test whether transverse-field signatures are observable in a given line and model.
  • The paper's calculations imply that in the lower corona, scattering linear polarization of the six forbidden lines is weak, with Fe xiv 5303 Å and Fe xiii 10747 Å the strongest; such predictions can guide line selection and integration times for observations.
  • For Si ix 39343 Å, transverse Zeeman signatures appear at low heights in strong-field active regions but remain near the detectability limit, giving a concrete upper bound on what current instruments can expect.
  • Because the code handles spherical Predictive Science models extending to several solar radii, the same synthesis can be applied to off-limb and large-scale coronal observations, not only disk-center geometries.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension of the code would be to apply it to EUV permitted lines such as O vi 1032 Å and Ne viii 770 Å, where the Hanle effect is not saturated; if the implementation handles them, P-CORONA could produce maps of field strength rather than only field orientation.
  • The strong coupling approximation is the main place where the computed Q, U, and V could be underestimated; implementing a full multipole treatment for a line like Si ix 39343 Å would give a direct test of how much polarization the non-dipole transitions actually carry.
  • The paper's conclusion that transverse Zeeman linear polarization is unobservable in these forbidden lines suggests that observers should prioritize longitudinal-field diagnostics via Stokes V or seek permitted lines with larger Zeeman sensitivity; P-CORONA could be used to survey candidate lines before committing telescope time.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents P-CORONA, an open-source Fortran 90 code for synthesizing Stokes I, Q, U, and V of coronal emission lines in 3D MHD models. The code solves multilevel statistical equilibrium equations for the atomic density matrix following Landi Degl'Innocenti & Landolfi (2004), including anisotropic radiative pumping, Hanle and Zeeman effects, electron and proton collisions, and Doppler dimming/brightening. The authors demonstrate the code on six forbidden lines (Fe xiii, Fe xiv, Fe xi, Si ix, Si x) in MURaM and PSI coronal models, and they highlight new predictions for the Zeeman-induced linear polarization of Fe xiii 10747 Å and Si ix 39343 Å. The code is publicly available on GitLab and Zenodo, with documentation.

Significance. If the implementation is correct, P-CORONA fills a real community need: a single public tool that treats both forbidden and permitted lines with a consistent Hanle-Zeeman framework in 3D coronal models, going beyond the saturated-Hanle approximation used by CLE/pyCELP for forbidden lines. The paper has notable strengths: the theoretical basis is established LL04 formalism, no ad-hoc fitted parameters enter the results, the inputs are standard (CHIANTI atomic data, MURaM/PSI models), and the authors explicitly quantify the detectability limitations of the predicted transverse-Zeeman signals. The code availability and strong-scaling tests are also positive. The main concerns are that the claimed benchmark against pyCELP is not shown quantitatively, and the domain of validity of the key emissivity expression is under-specified for non-dipole transitions and for arbitrary magnetic-field orientations.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.2 (Eq. 1)] The paper states that LL04 theory is valid 'under the dipole approximation,' yet it applies Eq. (1) to all radiative transitions satisfying ΔJ=0,±1, including 'non-dipole transitions.' For an electric quadrupole or higher multipole transition, the emitted photon carries angular momentum beyond rank 1, and the (1 1 K) angular factors and 3-j symbols in Eq. (1) are not the correct emissivity. Since the six showcase forbidden lines are not explicitly classified as pure M1 or E1 transitions, and since the Casini et al. (2024) multipole extension is stated not to be implemented, the code's computed Q, U, and V for any modeled line with non-negligible E2/M1 or higher multipole admixture would be systematically incorrect. The authors should either restrict the stated applicability to pure electric/magnetic dipole (rank-1) transitions, explicitly demonstrate that each modeled line is dipole-dominated, or implement the multipole treatment they cite as future work.
  2. [Section 2.2 (quantization axis)] The text specifies that the solar radius vector is the quantization axis for total angular momentum, but Zeeman sublevel energies are M-diagonal only when the quantization axis is aligned with the magnetic field. The manuscript does not describe a rotation to the magnetic-field reference frame before evaluating Eq. (1), nor does it explain how the LL04 magnetic-kernel treatment accounts for the arbitrary field orientation. In the MURaM/PSI models the magnetic field direction changes significantly, so the transverse-Zeeman Q and U signatures shown in Figures 13–14 could be misassigned if the profile functions in Eq. (1) are evaluated in the vertical-axis frame without including the required level mixing or frame rotation. The authors need to specify the exact reference-frame procedure, or cite the precise LL04 equations that make the vertical-axis expression exact for arbitrary B.
  3. [Section 2.2 (benchmark)] The claimed validation against pyCELP is presented only qualitatively: the text states 'good agreement between the results obtained using both codes, except when accounting for the impact of the Zeeman effect on the Stokes Q and U profiles for some IR lines.' This is a load-bearing point for a code paper, and the disagreement is exactly in the new Zeeman Q,U terms. A quantitative comparison, such as maximum relative differences in I, Q, U, and V as functions of wavelength and line-of-sight position for Fe xiii and Si ix, should be included so that the central correctness claim can be verified.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Figures 5–12] Several figure panels contain corrupted or unreadable text (e.g., 'R/uni2299' in Figure 12 and repeated mangled labels in the colorbar axis text of Figures 5–11); the final version should use clean vector labels.
  2. [Table 2] The quantity called 'total linear polarization' should be defined precisely; because Q and U vary across the line profile, the frequency-integrated P = sqrt(Q^2+U^2) is not a simple integrated linear-polarization amplitude unless an explicit convention is given.
  3. [Section 3.1] For the six forbidden lines the manuscript should state the dominant radiative multipole character (M1, E2, or mixed) for each line, since this is directly relevant to the validity discussion in Section 2.2.
  4. [Section 2.1] The fixed-LOS geometry is clearly acknowledged as unsuitable for near-Sun observers; the text should also state whether the code can be rerun with a rotated LOS to approximate Solar Orbiter/Parker Solar Probe viewing, since several readers may attempt such an use.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: P-CORONA is an implementation of the external LL04 theory with no fitted parameters and no prediction-equivalent-to-input construction.

full rationale

P-CORONA is presented as an implementation of the published LL04 density-matrix theory: the emissivity in Eq. (1) is taken from LL04 Eq. (7.15e), and the statistical equilibrium equations, radiative rates, collisional rates, and magnetic kernel are cited to LL04 Sections 7.2–7.4. No parameter is fitted to the Stokes outputs, and no claimed prediction is obtained by inverting an input. The atmospheric models (MURaM, PSI), atomic data (CHIANTI), abundances, and disk radiation are all external inputs, so the synthetic Stokes maps are not equivalent by construction to any fitted quantity. The self-citations (Supriya et al. 2021 for permitted-line Ly-alpha modeling and the Doppler-dimming radiation-tensor formula; Del Zanna & Supriya 2025 for Fe xiii atomic data) are prior independent work and are not used as a definitional loop or as the sole justification of the central claim. The paper's own caveats—that LL04 is used under the dipole approximation, that non-dipole transitions are handled by the strong-coupling approximation or deferred to Casini et al. (2024), and that the pyCELP benchmark is described but not shown quantitatively—are correctness and validation risks, not circular reductions. No quoted equation or step reduces to its own input, so the appropriate finding is no circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the published LL04 theory, on the dipole and strong-coupling approximations for radiative transitions, on the optically thin approximation in the LOS integration, on external CHIANTI atomic data, and on external MURaM and PSI 3D models. No new physical entity or fitted free parameter is introduced; the code's output is a derived quantity.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math LL04 complete frequency redistribution theory of spectral line polarization is valid for the coronal lines modeled.
    The code is built on Section 7.2 of LL04 (Section 2.2); correctness of the synthetic Stokes profiles rests on this theory.
  • domain assumption Dipole approximation applies to all radiative transitions satisfying ΔJ=0,±1, and other transitions only affect populations (strong coupling approximation).
    Section 2.2: non-dipole transitions are treated under the strong coupling approximation, contributing only to populations; if higher-order multipoles carry polarization, Q, U, V could be underestimated.
  • domain assumption Coronal lines observed here are optically thin, so LOS integration of emissivities (Eq. 3) is valid without radiative transfer.
    Section 2.2: emissivities are integrated along the LOS without solving the transfer equation; valid for optically thin coronal lines.
  • domain assumption Atomic data (CHIANTI v10) and abundances (Schmelz et al. 2012) are accurate.
    Section 2.1: radiative and collisional rates and ionization fractions taken from CHIANTI; abundances assumed constant.
  • domain assumption Fixed LOS geometry (X-axis along LOS) is sufficient for the applications shown.
    Section 2.1: the fixed-LOS geometry is noted as unsuitable for near-Sun missions like Solar Orbiter or Parker Solar Probe, so the presented syntheses are limited to Earth-view geometry.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of P-CORONA: A New Tool for Calculating the Intensity and Polarization of Coronal Lines in 3D Models of the Solar Corona." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4M7UPDMU

@misc{pith2026250505962,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: P-CORONA: A New Tool for Calculating the Intensity and Polarization of Coronal Lines in 3D Models of the Solar Corona},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4M7UPDMU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.05962}
}
read the original abstract

The critical need to study the magnetic field in the solar corona is highlighted by recent observational facilities, such as DKIST and Aditya-L1. A powerful tool for probing the magnetism of the solar corona is forward modeling of the intensity and polarization of coronal emission lines in three-dimensional (3D) magnetohydrodynamic models. Here we present P-CORONA, a new spectral synthesis code designed to calculate the intensity and polarization of coronal lines in 3D models of the solar corona, taking into account the symmetry breaking induced by magnetic and velocity fields. P-CORONA allows the calculation of the on-disk and off-limb intensity and polarization of forbidden and permitted coronal lines, thus facilitating a wide range of investigations. Applying the quantum theory of atom-photon interactions, P-CORONA accounts for the spectral line polarization caused by anisotropic radiation pumping and the Hanle and Zeeman effects, making it a valuable tool for investigating coronal magnetic fields. This paper details the code's theoretical formulation, the implementation, and illustrative results of calculations in different 3D coronal models (MURaM and Predictive Science Inc.), including the impact of the Zeeman effect from the transverse magnetic field component on selected coronal forbidden lines. P-CORONA is now accessible to the research community on GitLab and Zenodo, providing a resource to facilitate research aimed at advancing our understanding of coronal magnetism and dynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.05962 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Representation of the coordinate axes in P-CORONA. The X-axis is parallel to the line-of-sight (LOS), and therefore the YZ plane is perpendicular to the LOS. The magnetic and velocity vector field components are given in spherical coordinates with reference to the “lo￾cal vertical” reference system, defined by the unit vectors (eˆr, eˆθ, eˆϕ), at each grid point. Different physical mechanisms influencing the spectra… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Illustrative example of the spatial domain decomposition with MPI and hybrid MPI+OpenMP parallelization in P-CORONA. theory of spectral line polarization described in Landi Degl’Innocenti & Landolfi (2004, hereafter, LL04). We believe the application of this code will improve our un￾derstanding of coronal structures and dynamics, paving the way for a more accurate understanding of the phys￾ical processes influencing… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. P-CORONA real and ideal speed-up when run with a different number of nodes (with 36 OpenMP threads per node) in the Piz Daint supercomputer. The largest run used 2304 cores. strong emission profile from the disk (e.g., Supriya et al. 2021). P-CORONA considers both scenarios. The second set of input parameters includes the atomic model for the coronal ion of interest. P-CORONA requires atomic data such as radiative a… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Sample visualization of lineout data (1D variation along a specific direction) using the GUI of P-CORONA. LL04, and an earlier derivation is also available in Landi Degl’Innocenti et al. (1990). We point out that the theory presented in LL04 is suitable under the dipol…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Representation of various atmospheric model parameters from different MURaM models, depicted in the plane-of￾the-sky. From top to bottom, each row illustrates specific quantities corresponding to the Active Region (AR), Coronal Arcade (CA), Open Flux (OF), and Quiet Su…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Stokes parameters for the Fe xiii 10747 ˚A line in selected MURaM models. Each of the first four rows presents maps of the frequency-integrated intensity (column 1), the total fractional linear polarization (column 2), and the maximum of Stokes V relative to the intens…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Frequency integrated intensity (left column), total fractional linear polarization (middle column), and maximum circular polarization relative to the intensity (right column) for the Fe xiii 10747 ˚A line in the Predictive Science models CR2157 (top row) and CR2138 (b…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Stokes I (green line), Stokes Q neglecting (black dashed curve) and accounting (solid blue curve) for the Zeeman effect and Stokes V (red curve) profiles for the Fe xiii 10747 ˚A (left column) and Si ix 39343 ˚A (middle column) lines in the AR MURaM model for three di…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Coronal Magnetometry with EUV Permitted Lines

    astro-ph.SR 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The authors calculate the linear polarization of many permitted EUV coronal lines and identify the most promising ones for measuring the orientation of the coronal magnetic field.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

25 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    A unifying polarization formalism for electric- and magnetic-multipole interactions

    Casini, R., Manso Sainz, R., Lopez Ariste, A., & Kaikati, N. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.01197, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.01197

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.01197 2024

  2. [2]

    M., & Judge, P

    Casini, R., White, S. M., & Judge, P. G. 2017, SSRv, 210, 145, doi: 10.1007/s11214-017-0400-6 Del Zanna, G., & DeLuca, E. E. 2018, ApJ, 852, 52, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9edf Del Zanna, G., Dere, K. P., Young, P. R., & Landi, E. 2021, ApJ, 909, 38, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abd8ce Del Zanna, G., & Supriya, H. D. 2025, MNRAS, accepted for publication

    doi:10.1007/s11214-017-0400-6 2017

  3. [3]

    F., Rimmele, T., Casini, R., et al

    Elmore, D. F., Rimmele, T., Casini, R., et al. 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9147, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy V, ed. S. K

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    Ramsay, I. S. McLean, & H. Takami, 914707, doi: 10.1117/12.2057038

    doi:10.1117/12.2057038

  5. [5]

    R., Schad, T

    Fehlmann, A., Kuhn, J. R., Schad, T. A., et al. 2023, SoPh, 298, 5, doi: 10.1007/s11207-022-02098-y

    doi:10.1007/s11207-022-02098-y 2023

  6. [6]

    P., Ignace, R., Erba, C., et al

    Folsom, C. P., Ignace, R., Erba, C., et al. 2022, Ap&SS, 367, 125, doi: 10.1007/s10509-022-04140-8

    doi:10.1007/s10509-022-04140-8 2022

  7. [7]

    2016, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 3, 8, doi: 10.3389/fspas.2016.00008

    Gibson, S., Kucera, T., White, S., et al. 2016, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 3, 8, doi: 10.3389/fspas.2016.00008

    arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    G., & Casini, R

    Judge, P. G., & Casini, R. 2001, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 236, Advanced Solar Polarimetry – Theory, Observation, and Instrumentation, ed. M. Sigwarth, 503

    work page 2001

Show all 25 references
  1. [9]

    G., Low, B

    Judge, P. G., Low, B. C., & Casini, R. 2006, ApJ, 651, 1229, doi: 10.1086/507982

    2006 doi

  2. [10]

    2012, A&A, 545, A52, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219404

    Khan, A. 2012, A&A, 545, A52, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219404

    2012 doi

  3. [11]

    2011, A&A, 529, A12, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015551

    Khan, A., Belluzzi, L., Landi Degl’Innocenti, E., Fineschi, S., & Romoli, M. 2011, A&A, 529, A12, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015551

    2011 doi

  4. [12]

    2012, A&A, 543, A158, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219164

    Khan, A., & Landi Degl’Innocenti, E. 2012, A&A, 543, A158, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219164

    2012 doi

  5. [13]

    R., & Tomczyk, S

    Landi, E., Habbal, S. R., & Tomczyk, S. 2016, Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 121, 8237, doi: 10.1002/2016JA022598 Landi Degl’Innocenti, E., Bommier, V., & Sahal-Brechot, S. 1990, A&A, 235, 459 Landi Degl’Innocenti, E., & Landolfi, M., eds. 2004, Astrophysics ...

    2016 doi

  6. [14]

    2017, ApJ, 838, 69, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6625 Manso Sainz, R., & Trujillo Bueno, J

    Li, H., Landi Degl’Innocenti, E., & Qu, Z. 2017, ApJ, 838, 69, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6625 Manso Sainz, R., & Trujillo Bueno, J. 2009, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 405, Solar Polarization 5: In Honor of Jan Stenflo, ed. S. V. Berdyugina, K. ...

    2017 doi

  7. [15]

    E., & Casini, R

    Molnar, M. E., & Casini, R. 2024, ApJ, 977, 97, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8de4

    2024 doi

  8. [16]

    Solanki, S. K. 2016, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 3, 20, doi: 10.3389/fspas.2016.00020

    2016

  9. [17]

    2017, ApJ, 834, 10, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/10

    Rempel, M. 2017, ApJ, 834, 10, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/10

    2017 doi

  10. [18]

    R., Warner, M., Keil, S

    Rimmele, T. R., Warner, M., Keil, S. L., et al. 2020, SoPh, 295, 172, doi: 10.1007/s11207-020-01736-7

    2020 doi

  11. [19]

    2020, SoPh, 295, 98, doi: 10.1007/s11207-020-01669-1 —

    Schad, T., & Dima, G. 2020, SoPh, 295, 98, doi: 10.1007/s11207-020-01669-1 —. 2021, SoPh, 296, 166, doi: 10.1007/s11207-021-01917-y

    2020 doi

  12. [20]

    A., Petrie, G

    Schad, T. A., Petrie, G. J., Kuhn, J. R., et al. 2024, Science Advances, 10, eadq1604, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adq1604

    2024 doi

  13. [21]

    T., Reames, D

    Schmelz, J. T., Reames, D. V., von Steiger, R., & Basu, S. 2012, ApJ, 755, 33, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/755/1/33

    2012 doi

  14. [22]

    2025, P-CORONA, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15195460

    Shchukina, N., & Trujillo Bueno, J. 2025, P-CORONA, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15195460

    2025 doi

  15. [23]

    D., Trujillo Bueno, J., de Vicente, ´A., & del Pino Alem´ an, T

    Supriya, H. D., Trujillo Bueno, J., de Vicente, ´A., & del Pino Alem´ an, T. 2021, ApJ, 920, 140, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1068

    2021 doi

  16. [24]

    2021, in AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, Vol

    Tomczyk, S., Landi, E., Berkey, B., et al. 2021, in AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 2021, 2089 Trujillo Bueno, J. 2001, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 236, Advanced Solar Polarimetry – Theory, Observation, and Instrumentation, ed. M. Sigwarth, ...

    2021 doi arXiv

  17. [25]

    2002, Nature, 415, 403, doi: 10.1038/415403a

    Merenda, L., & Manso Sainz, R. 2002, Nature, 415, 403, doi: 10.1038/415403a

    2002 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.