Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

Serendipitous discovery of a spiral host in a 2 Mpc double-double lobed radio galaxy

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The spiral galaxy LEDA 896325 launches two nested pairs of radio jets spanning 2.24 Mpc, making it the largest known radio galaxy in a disk host.

desk verdict A likely record-setting spiral-host giant radio galaxy, but the 'double-double' label rests on a single-frequency inner lobe that may be core emission; worth refereeing carefully. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.06089 v1 pith:BQBOJYTB submitted 2025-05-09 astro-ph.GA

Sagar Sethi , Agnieszka Kuźmicz , Dominika Hunik , Marek Jamrozy This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords double-doubleradiogalaxygiantspiralhostrecurrentjetactivityspectralagingLEDA896325J1350-1634morphology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports that the radio source J1350−1634, centered on the spiral galaxy LEDA 896325, is a double-double radio galaxy: two nested pairs of radio lobes produced by two separate episodes of jet activity, spanning a projected 2.24 Mpc. If correct, this makes it the largest radio galaxy known in a spiral host and the largest of only three spiral-host double-double systems. The authors use optical imaging and surface-brightness decomposition to confirm the host's disk morphology, radio data across 84 MHz to 20 GHz to map the lobes, and synchrotron aging models to date the two outbursts at roughly 120 and 35 million years. The finding challenges the assumption that giant radio jets require elliptical hosts, suggesting that a sufficiently massive black hole and favorable conditions can let a disk galaxy sustain megaparsec-scale jets.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the double-double structure itself: two nested, aligned pairs of radio lobes centred on the same active nucleus, which is the standard signature of episodic (recurrent) jet activity. The paper defines and identifies the inner and outer pairs on RACS/GLEAM/NVSS maps (inner pair 0.71 Mpc, outer pair 2.24 Mpc) and then uses two further tools: GALFIT surface-brightness decomposition to demonstrate that the host's light profile is a disk plus pseudo-bulge rather than an elliptical's, and the Jaffe–Perola synchrotron aging model (via the SYNAGE package) to date the two episodes. The difference between the derived ages (120 vs 35 Myr) is what turns morphology into a claim of two separate activity cycles.

What would settle it

High-resolution, low-frequency radio imaging of the region around the core (e.g., with the VLA or uGMRT at ~400–900 MHz, at resolutions of a few arcseconds or better) that resolves the south-western inner lobe as a separate extended structure from the flat-spectrum core would confirm the DDRG classification; if no separate lobe is resolved, the double-double claim collapses to a single-episode giant radio galaxy.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

J1350−1634, hosted by the spiral galaxy LEDA 896325 at redshift 0.0877, is a double-double radio galaxy (DDRG) with a projected linear size of 2.24 Mpc, built from an outer pair of lobes (separated by 22 arcminutes) and an inner pair (7 arcminutes) that indicate two distinct epochs of jet activity. The authors demonstrate this through multi-frequency radio imaging: GLEAM at 200 MHz and RACS at low frequency reveal the outer and inner pairs, and a spectral index map between 200 and 1400 MHz separates the flat-spectrum core from the steep-spectrum lobes. Optical imaging from the DESI Legacy Survey, modelled with GALFIT, shows a disk component with a Sérsic index near 0.8 and a pseudo-bulge, i.e., a spiral host rather than an elliptical. From the stellar velocity dispersion they derive a central black hole mass of 2.4×$10^{8}$ M⊙, comparable to giant ellipticals. Fitting the lobe spectra with the Jaffe–Perola model gives synchrotron ages of about 120 Myr for the outer lobes and 35 Myr for the inner NE lobe, confirming temporally separated activity cycles in the same galaxy.

Load-bearing premise

The double-double classification depends on the south-western inner radio lobe being a real, distinct lobe; the paper itself notes that the bright radio core dominates that region and mimics the lobe, and the lobe is detected only in a single survey (RACS-low).

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Spiral galaxies, not only ellipticals, must be considered viable hosts of giant radio galaxies; any census of giant radio sources that assumes elliptical hosts will miss or misclassify sources like this one.
  • Recurrent jet activity can operate in disk galaxies, so models of jet triggering and restarting cannot require a merger-built, gas-poor elliptical environment.
  • A central black hole mass of roughly 2×10^8 M⊙ appears sufficient to launch megaparsec-scale jets even when the host retains its disk and spiral arms.
  • The two distinct spectral ages (about 120 and 35 Myr) give concrete timescales for the active and quiescent phases of an episodic jet cycle in a spiral host, useful for testing jet duty-cycle models.
  • With only two other spiral-host DDRGs known at sizes above 1 Mpc, this discovery roughly doubles the size record and sharpens the question of why such systems are so rare.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the SW inner lobe is confirmed by deeper imaging as a separate structure (the paper notes the core is mimicking it), the double-double classification holds; if not, the source would still be a giant radio galaxy in a spiral host, but no longer a DDRG, weakening the episodic-activity claim.
  • The one-sided VLBA jet extension aligned with the NE outer lobe hints at a possible third activity episode; dedicated VLBI monitoring could turn this into the fifth known 'triple-double' radio galaxy, a direct test of the recurrence scenario.
  • Serendipitous discovery suggests that systematic cross-matching of spiral morphologies with low-frequency radio surveys may reveal more spiral-host giant radio galaxies, implying the current count of three is a lower limit.
  • The environment is sparse (no group or cluster within 6 Mpc), which, if confirmed spectroscopically, would argue that jet triggering in this spiral did not require a dense cluster environment, pointing instead to a minor interaction or secular processes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports the serendipitous identification of J1350-1634 as a giant radio galaxy (projected size 2.24 Mpc) hosted by a spiral galaxy, LEDA 896325. The authors combine DESI Legacy Survey optical imaging with multi-frequency radio data (GLEAM, RACS, NVSS) to argue that the host is a disk galaxy with a spiral structure, that the central black hole has a mass of 2.4e8 Msun, and that the radio morphology contains two episodes of jet activity, i.e. a double-double radio galaxy (DDRG). Spectral aging of the outer and inner (NE) lobes yields ages of about 120 and 35 Myr, respectively, which the authors interpret as evidence of recurrent jet activity. The paper concludes that J1350-1634 is the largest radio galaxy in a spiral host and the largest of only three such spiral-host DDRGs.

Significance. If the central claims are correct, this object is an extreme and rare case: a giant radio galaxy (GRG) in a spiral host with evidence of episodic jet activity, directly challenging the standard picture that such sources are hosted exclusively by ellipticals. The paper is built almost entirely on public survey data, which is a strength in terms of reproducibility, and the authors are transparent about several limitations (e.g., the non-flux-calibrated 6dF spectrum, the ambiguity of the SW inner lobe). However, the significance of the work depends heavily on two fragile pillars: the reality of the SW inner lobe that establishes the DDRG classification, and the quantitative classification of the host as a spiral. If either fails, the primary claim is substantially weaker, and the paper would reduce to a (still interesting) report of a giant radio galaxy in a possible disk host. The current evidence does not yet firmly support the strongest headline claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sect. 3.4 and Sect. 3.5] The double-double classification is not securely established. The SW inner lobe, which is required to define two episodes of jet activity, is detected only in RACS-low, and the paper itself states in Sect. 3.5 that "the core emission dominates the central part of the source, influencing and mimicking the SW inner lobe." The spectral index map in Fig. B.1 shows only four distinct structures (core, two outer lobes, NE inner lobe) and no distinct SW inner lobe. The spectral-age fitting is performed exclusively for the NE inner lobe, not for the SW counterpart. Given that the NE inner lobe is ~14 times brighter and twice as large as the SW candidate, there is a real possibility that the SW feature is an artifact of core confusion. The authors should confirm the reality of the SW inner lobe with additional radio data (e.g., RACS-mid or deeper imaging) or, if this is not possible, explicitly downgrade the claim from a confirmed DDRG to a candidate DDRG and temper the conclusion that recurrent jet activity is confirmed.
  2. [Sect. 3.1] The spiral classification of the host rests on residual features from two GALFIT models, and the quantitative evidence is not conclusive. Model 1 gives a single Sersic index n=1.8, which is explicitly intermediate between a disk and an elliptical; Model 2 gives an exponential disk and a pseudo-bulge. The residual images are said to reveal "spiral- or ring-like" structure, but no significance estimate, model comparison (e.g., BIC or likelihood ratio), or alternative morphological classification (e.g., visual classification or catalog matching) is provided. The claim in the abstract that the authors "confirm a spiral-arm feature" is therefore stronger than the presented evidence supports. The authors should provide a more robust morphological analysis (e.g., a 2D decomposition with proper model selection, or a color image and independent classification) or soften the wording to "suggest" rather than "confirm" the spiral nature.
  3. [Sect. 3.5] The spectral-age estimates are used as a supporting argument for recurrent activity, but they are based on several fixed assumptions that are not systematically explored. The injection index is fixed to 0.5, the magnetic field is set to Bmin, and the break frequency for the inner lobe is derived from a single lobe (NE inner). The resulting ages (120 and 35 Myr) are plausible, but the paper would be strengthened by a discussion of how these ages depend on the assumed injection index and magnetic field, e.g., by quoting a range of ages for Bmin, B_CMB, and equipartition conditions. As written, the ages are presented without error bars or robustness checks, which makes them insufficient to independently corroborate the DDRG interpretation.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sect. 4] The conclusion states that J1350-1634 is "the largest of only three known spiral-host DDRGs with a size > 2 Mpc," but the two previously known spiral-host DDRGs (Speca and J2345-0449) are cited as having sizes of 1.4 Mpc and 1.6 Mpc. This is internally inconsistent; the phrase "with a size > 2 Mpc" should be removed or the wording changed to "with a size > 2 Mpc" applying only to the new source.
  2. [Sect. 3.4] The phrase "visible only on the RACS-low" should be expanded to make clear that the SW inner lobe is not seen in GLEAM, NVSS, or the spectral index map; a reader should not have to infer this from Sect. 3.5.
  3. [Fig. B.1] The spectral index map would benefit from an explicit label or overlay of the putative SW inner lobe, so that the reader can judge whether there is any feature at that location in the spectral index distribution.
  4. [Sect. 3.2] The black hole mass is estimated from the MBH-sigma relation using a velocity dispersion derived from a 6dF spectrum that is not flux-calibrated; the authors acknowledge this limitation, but it would be helpful to state the statistical uncertainty on sigma and on the resulting MBH, and to note that the MBH-sigma relation for spiral hosts may have additional scatter.
  5. [Sect. 3.3] The discussion of the companion galaxy 'g2' and LEDA 896133 is speculative; the paper should make clear that the redshifts are uncertain and that the interaction scenario is not yet testable with the current data.
  6. [Abstract] The abstract says "confirm a spiral-arm feature," but as noted in the major comments, the evidence is residual-based; consider replacing "confirm" with "reveal" or "suggest" to match the current level of certainty.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the discovery claims are observational and the derived quantities (BH mass, spectral ages) are not used to define the claimed DDRG structure.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are morphological and observational: that LEDA 896325 is a spiral host, that J1350-1634 has an outer and an inner pair of radio lobes, and that the source is therefore the largest known spiral-host double-double radio galaxy with a projected size of 2.24 Mpc. None of these claims is derived by construction from a fitted parameter. The spiral classification rests on DESI imaging and GALFIT decomposition, with the residual images showing spiral/ring structure independently of the radio morphology. The black-hole mass uses the external MBH-sigma relation of Gebhardt et al. (2000) with constants from Batiste et al. (2017); it is contextual and is not recycled into any prediction. The spectral ages are fits using the Jaffe-Perola model with SYNAGE, but the double-double classification is established before the spectral-age discussion and the ages are used only as supporting evidence of two activity episodes, not as the definition of the two lobe pairs. The paper does explicitly flag a limitation in Sect. 3.5: 'The core emission dominates the central part of the source, influencing and mimicking the SW inner lobe', and Sect. 3.4 notes the SW inner lobe is 'visible only on the RACS-low' survey. These are genuine observational uncertainties that affect the strength of the DDRG claim, but they are not circularity: the uncertainty is about whether the structure exists, not about whether an output reproduces an input by construction. The citation of the authors' own prior work (Kuzmicz et al. 2018 as the GRG catalogue; Sethi et al. 2024 for fitting details) is routine and not load-bearing for the central discovery. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no quantity is defined in terms of the claim it supports, and no uniqueness theorem or self-citation is invoked to forbid alternative classifications. Therefore no significant circularity is present; the honest finding is a score of 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard astrophysical scaling relations and models. No new entities are introduced. The main discretionary inputs are the fixed injection index, the assumed magnetic field value, and the fitted break frequencies; these affect the spectral ages but not the DDRG geometry. The spiral classification depends on the GALFIT model assumptions.

free parameters (5)
  • injection spectral index = 0.5 (fixed)
    Fixed by assumption in the Jaffe-Perola spectral aging model (Sect. 3.5).
  • minimum-energy magnetic field Bmin = 2.2 uG
    Adopted to maximize radiative lifetime, providing an upper limit on spectral age (Sect. 3.5).
  • outer lobe break frequency = 0.9 GHz
    Fitted to the radio spectra of the outer lobes using SYNAGE (Sect. 3.5).
  • inner lobe break frequency = 10 GHz
    Fitted to the radio spectrum of the NE inner lobe using SYNAGE (Sect. 3.5).
  • Sersic indices and component parameters in GALFIT = n_disk=0.8, n_bulge=1.45 (Model 2); n=1.8 (Model 1)
    Fitted to the DESI g-band image to decompose the host light profile (Sect. 3.1). These support the spiral classification but are descriptive outputs, not hand-tuned.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The MBH-sigma relation calibrated on AGN samples applies to LEDA 896325
    Used to convert the measured stellar velocity dispersion (sigma*=240 km/s) to a black hole mass of 2.4e8 Msun (Sect. 3.2).
  • domain assumption The radio source is at the same redshift as the optical host (z=0.0877)
    The projected size of 2.24 Mpc and all physical quantities depend on the 6dF spectroscopic redshift; no independent confirmation is given for the radio-optical association beyond positional coincidence.
  • domain assumption Jaffe-Perola spectral aging model with a single injection index correctly describes the lobe spectra
    The spectral ages are derived under this model with the injection index fixed to 0.5 (Sect. 3.5).
  • domain assumption The minimum-energy field Bmin is appropriate for these lobes
    Used to convert break frequencies to ages; the authors note it gives an upper limit on the ages (Sect. 3.5).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Serendipitous discovery of a spiral host in a 2 Mpc double-double lobed radio galaxy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BQBOJYTB

@misc{pith2026250506089,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Serendipitous discovery of a spiral host in a 2 Mpc double-double lobed radio galaxy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BQBOJYTB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.06089}
}
abstract

We present the serendipitous discovery of a double-double radio galaxy (DDRG) with a projected linear size exceeding 2 Mpc, hosted by a spiral galaxy. This unique combination of a giant radio structure and a spiral host challenges the prevailing view that such extreme radio sources reside only in elliptical galaxies. Using high-resolution optical imaging from the DESI Legacy Imaging Survey (DR10), we confirm a spiral-arm feature and a disk-component in the surface brightness profile fitting for the host galaxy (LEDA 896325) having a black hole of mass 2.4 $\times$ 10$^8$ $\rm M_{\odot}$. Radio observations from RACS and GLEAM reveal two distinct pairs of radio lobes. Using the multi-frequency analysis of radio data, we obtained the spectral index distribution and estimate the spectral ages of the outer and inner radio lobes to be approximately 120 and 35 Myr, respectively. Our results confirm recurrent jet activity in this disk galaxy and establish it as the largest known radio galaxy in a spiral host, and its double-double structure makes it the largest of only three such spiral-host DDRGs, demonstrating that disk galaxies can indeed launch extremely large-scale radio jets.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.06089 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The false-colour image of J1350−1634 is shown, where red and blue colours represent GLEAM (200 MHz, with rms of 15 mJy beam−1 ) and NVSS (1400 MHz, with rms of 0.45 mJy beam−1 ) respectively. The thin black contours of RACS-mid (887 MHz, with rms of 0.3 mJy beam−1 ) are plotted at 3 rms × 2 n (n = 0,1,2,3 ...). Both red and blue pixels show values above 3 × rms for the respective data. The outer and inner lobes, as … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Left: The DESI g-band image of LEDA 896325, with a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The surface brightness profiles along the cross-section, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Numerical Simulations of Restarted Jets -- I. Dynamics

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 accept novelty 6.5 of 10

    Restarted jets propagate ballistically through rarefied remnant cocoons with minimal backflow, decelerating only at dense entrained structures, after the cocoon evolves through conical-cylindrical-mushroom phases shap...

  2. SuperMIGHTEE : Spectral Ages of Remnant Radio Galaxy Candidates in the XMM-LSS Field

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Sensitive 144 MHz–1.5 GHz SEDs confirm 12 genuine remnant radio galaxies with short spectral ages (~8–42 Myr) and diverse remnant fractions, revealing a rapidly fading high-z population.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    1993, ARA&A, 31, 473 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A

    Antonucci, R. 1993, ARA&A, 31, 473 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim, P. L., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 167

    work page 1993

  2. [2]

    Baars, J. W. M., Genzel, R., Pauliny-Toth, I. I. K., & Witzel, A. 1977, A&A, 61, 99

    1977

  3. [3]

    2014, ApJ, 788, 174

    Bagchi, J., Vivek, M., Vikram, V ., et al. 2014, ApJ, 788, 174

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    C., Raimundo, S

    Batiste, M., Bentz, M. C., Raimundo, S. I., Vestergaard, M., & Onken, C. A. 2017, ApJ, 838, L10

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    H., Peacock, J

    Bilicki, M., Jarrett, T. H., Peacock, J. A., Cluver, M. E., & Steward, L. 2014, ApJS, 210, 9

    2014

  6. [6]

    2019, MNRAS, 485, 1188

    Bonato, M., Liuzzo, E., Herranz, D., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 1188

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    2017, A&A, 606, A98

    Brienza, M., Godfrey, L., Morganti, R., et al. 2017, A&A, 606, A98

    2017

  8. [8]

    Chavan, K., Dabhade, P., & Saikia, D. J. 2023, MNRAS, 525, L87 Cid Fernandes, R., Mateus, A., Sodré, L., Stasi ´nska, G., & Gomes, J. M. 2005, MNRAS, 358, 363

    work page 2023

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    Condon, J. J. 1992, ARA&A, 30, 575

    1992

  2. [10]

    J., Cotton, W

    Condon, J. J., Cotton, W. D., Greisen, E. W., et al. 1998, AJ, 115, 1693

    1998

  3. [11]

    J., & Mahato, M

    Dabhade, P., Saikia, D. J., & Mahato, M. 2023, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 44, 13 D’Abrusco, R., Massaro, F., Paggi, A., et al. 2014, ApJS, 215, 14 Dálya, G., Díaz, R., Bouchet, F. R., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 1403

    2023

  4. [12]

    J., Lang, D., et al

    Dey, A., Schlegel, D. J., Lang, D., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 168

    2019

  5. [13]

    W., Ross, K., Thomson, A

    Duchesne, S. W., Ross, K., Thomson, A. J. M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.04978

    2025 arXiv

  6. [14]

    W., Thomson, A

    Duchesne, S. W., Thomson, A. J. M., Pritchard, J., et al. 2023, PASA, 40, e034

    2023

  7. [15]

    Fanaroff, B. L. & Riley, J. M. 1974, MNRAS, 167, 31P

    1974

  8. [16]

    2000, ApJ, 539, L13

    Gebhardt, K., Bender, R., Bower, G., et al. 2000, ApJ, 539, L13

    2000

  9. [17]

    Gomes, J. M. & Papaderos, P. 2012, in Astrophysics and Space Science Proceed- ings, V ol. 28, Dwarf Galaxies: Keys to Galaxy Formation and Evolution, ed. P. Papaderos, S. Recchi, & G. Hensler, 225

    2012

  10. [18]

    Greisen, E. W. 2003, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, V ol. 285, In- formation Handling in Astronomy - Historical Vistas, ed. A. Heck, 109

    2003

  11. [19]

    R., Wright, A

    Griffith, M. R., Wright, A. E., Burke, B. F., & Ekers, R. D. 1994, ApJS, 90, 179

    1994

  12. [20]

    E., Romani, R

    Healey, S. E., Romani, R. W., Taylor, G. B., et al. 2007, ApJS, 171, 61

    2007

  13. [21]

    H., Ohyama, Y ., et al

    Hota, A., Croston, J. H., Ohyama, Y ., et al. 2014, in Astronomical Society of India Conference Series, V ol. 13, Astronomical Society of India Conference Series, 141–145

    2014

  14. [22]

    S., et al

    Hota, A., Konar, C., Stalin, C. S., et al. 2016, Journal of Astrophysics and As- tronomy, 37, 41

    2016

  15. [23]

    K., Ohyama, Y ., et al

    Hota, A., Sirothia, S. K., Ohyama, Y ., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 417, L36

    2011

  16. [24]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90

    2007

  17. [25]

    R., Hancock, P

    Hurley-Walker, N., Callingham, J. R., Hancock, P. J., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 1146

    2017

  18. [26]

    T., Jagannathan, P., Mooley, K

    Intema, H. T., Jagannathan, P., Mooley, K. P., & Frail, D. A. 2017, A&A, 598, A78

    2017

  19. [27]

    Ishwara-Chandra, C. H. & Saikia, D. J. 1999, MNRAS, 309, 100

    1999

  20. [28]

    Jaffe, W. J. & Perola, G. C. 1973, A&A, 26, 423

    1973

  21. [29]

    H., Gregorini, L., & Parma, P

    Jamrozy, M., Klein, U., Mack, K. H., Gregorini, L., & Parma, P. 2004, A&A, 427, 79

    2004

  22. [30]

    H., Read, M

    Jones, D. H., Read, M. A., Saunders, W., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 399, 683

    2009

  23. [31]

    C., White, III, R

    Keel, W. C., White, III, R. E., Owen, F. N., & Ledlow, M. J. 2006, AJ, 132, 2233

    2006

  24. [32]

    J., Jamrozy, M., & Croston, J

    Konar, C., Hardcastle, M. J., Jamrozy, M., & Croston, J. H. 2013, MNRAS, 430, 2137

    2013

  25. [33]

    Kormendy, J. & Ho, L. C. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 511 Kozieł-Wierzbowska, D., Jamrozy, M., Zola, S., Stachowski, G., & Ku´ zmicz, A. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 1546 Ku´ zmicz, A., Jamrozy, M., Bronarska, K., Janda-Boczar, K., & Saikia, D. J. 2018, ApJS, 238, 9

    2013

  26. [34]

    A., Chandler, C

    Lacy, M., Baum, S. A., Chandler, C. J., et al. 2020, PASP, 132, 035001

    2020

  27. [35]

    J., Owen, F

    Ledlow, M. J., Owen, F. N., & Keel, W. C. 1998, ApJ, 495, 227

    1998

  28. [36]

    2024, MNRAS, 528, 141 Article number, page 5 A&A proofs: manuscript no

    Lusetti, G., de Gasperin, F., Cuciti, V ., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 141 Article number, page 5 A&A proofs: manuscript no. main_arxiv

    2024

  29. [37]

    Mahatma, V . H. 2023, Galaxies, 11, 74

    2023

  30. [38]

    Y ., Owen, F., Duffin, R., et al

    Mao, M. Y ., Owen, F., Duffin, R., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 446, 4176

    2015

  31. [39]

    2021, MN- RAS, 501, 853

    Marecki, A., Jamrozy, M., Machalski, J., & Pajdosz- ´Smierciak, U. 2021, MN- RAS, 501, 853

    2021

  32. [40]

    L., Lenc, E., et al

    McConnell, D., Hale, C. L., Lenc, E., et al. 2020, PASA, 37, e048

    2020

  33. [41]

    2024, A&A, 682, A34

    Merloni, A., Lamer, G., Liu, T., et al. 2024, A&A, 682, A34

    2024

  34. [42]

    2024, Galaxies, 12, 11

    Morganti, R. 2024, Galaxies, 12, 11

    2024

  35. [43]

    D., Mao, M

    Mulcahy, D. D., Mao, M. Y ., Mitsuishi, I., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, L8

    2016

  36. [44]

    1996, PhD thesis, University of Bologna

    Murgia, M. 1996, PhD thesis, University of Bologna

    1996

  37. [45]

    H., et al

    Murgia, M., Parma, P., Mack, K. H., et al. 2011, A&A, 526, A148

    2011

  38. [46]

    M., Ekers, R

    Murphy, T., Sadler, E. M., Ekers, R. D., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 402, 2403

    2010

  39. [47]

    2013, The Physics and Evolution of Active Galactic Nuclei

    Netzer, H. 2013, The Physics and Evolution of Active Galactic Nuclei

    2013

  40. [48]

    R., et al

    Parma, P., Murgia, M., de Ruiter, H. R., et al. 2007, A&A, 470, 875

    2007

  41. [49]

    Y ., Ho, L

    Peng, C. Y ., Ho, L. C., Impey, C. D., & Rix, H. W. 2007, in American Astronom- ical Society Meeting Abstracts, V ol. 211, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, 47.04 Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., et al. 2016, A&A, 594, A13

    2007

  42. [50]

    Proctor, D. D. 2016, ApJS, 224, 18

    2016

  43. [51]

    2021, PASA, 38, e008

    Quici, B., Hurley-Walker, N., Seymour, N., et al. 2021, PASA, 38, e008

    2021

  44. [52]

    L., Hovatta, T., Max-Moerbeck, W., et al

    Richards, J. L., Hovatta, T., Max-Moerbeck, W., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 438, 3058

    2014

  45. [53]

    & Bressert, E

    Robitaille, T. & Bressert, E. 2012, APLpy: Astronomical Plotting Library in

    2012

  46. [54]

    Saikia, D. J. & Jamrozy, M. 2009, Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India, 37, 63

    2009

  47. [55]

    Kaiser, C. R. 2000, MNRAS, 315, 371

    2000

  48. [56]

    2024, ApJ, 969, 156

    Sethi, S., Ku´ zmicz, A., Jamrozy, M., & Slavcheva-Mihova, L. 2024, ApJ, 969, 156

    2024

  49. [57]

    H., Sievers, J., et al

    Singh, V ., Ishwara-Chandra, C. H., Sievers, J., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 1556

    2015

  50. [58]

    Urry, C. M. & Padovani, P. 1995, PASP, 107, 803 V oges, W., Aschenbach, B., Boller, T., et al. 1999, A&A, 349, 389

    1995

  51. [59]

    Wen, Z. L. & Han, J. L. 2024, ApJS, 272, 39

    2024

  52. [60]

    L., Han, J

    Wen, Z. L., Han, J. L., & Liu, F. S. 2012, ApJS, 199, 34

    2012

  53. [61]

    L., Han, J

    Wen, Z. L., Han, J. L., & Yang, F. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 343

    2018

  54. [62]

    Wilson, A. S. & Colbert, E. J. M. 1995, ApJ, 438, 62

    1995

  55. [63]

    C., & Zhuang, M.-Y

    Wu, Z., Ho, L. C., & Zhuang, M.-Y . 2022, ApJ, 941, 95

    2022

  56. [64]

    S., Gao, X

    Yuan, Z. S., Gao, X. Y ., Wen, Z. L., & Han, J. L. 2024, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 24, 045007 Article number, page 6 Sethi et al.: Serendipitous discovery of a spiral host in a 2 Mpc double–double lobed radio galaxy Appendix A: Optical image of LEDA 896325 galaxy...

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.