Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Existence of Bianchi-Egnell stability extremizer for the Hardy-Sobolev inequality

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Theorem: the Hardy-Sobolev Bianchi-Egnell constant is attained for every $\gamma$ in $[\gamma_0,(N-2)^2/4)$, for all $N\ge3$.

desk verdict A solid extension of the Bianchi-Egnell attainment program to the Hardy-Sobolev case; the new hidden critical level works, and the main flaw—unproved existence of γ0 for N≥4—is a trivial fix, not a real gap. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.07039 v2 pith:N3JOTKV3 submitted 2025-05-11 math.AP math.FA

classification math.APmath.FA MSC 26D1046E3549K4047J2049J2049J40
keywords Hardy-SobolevinequalityBianchi-Egnellstabilityextremizerquantitativespectralgapconcentration-compactnessCaffarelli-Kohn-Nirenbergextremalfunctions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that the best Bianchi-Egnell constant for the Hardy-Sobolev inequality, the infimum of the deficit ratio $\delta(u)/\mathrm{dist}(u,\mathcal{M}_{\mathrm{HS}})^2$ over functions that are not optimizers, is attained for every Hardy parameter $\gamma$ in the range $\gamma_0\le\gamma<(N-2)^2/4$, for every $N\ge3$. This extends to the singular Hardy-Sobolev case the existence of a stability extremizer that was known for the classical Sobolev inequality at $\gamma=0$. The interest is that the standard route fails here: the usual non-vanishing third-eigenfunction criterion does not hold, and the inequality is not translation invariant, so extracting a non-zero weak limit from a minimizing sequence is a real obstacle. The paper identifies a third critical level, $C_{\mathrm{BE}}(\gamma)<1-S_\gamma/S$, that supplies the missing weak limit, and then rules out loss of compactness by comparing with the local and two-bubble critical levels.

What carries the argument

The core machinery is a chain of three comparison levels for the best constant. The local Bianchi-Egnell level $\Lambda(\gamma)=1-\mu_2^\gamma/\mu_3^\gamma$ is the spectral gap of the linearized Hardy-Sobolev operator; the two-peak level is computed by testing with a sum of two weakly interacting optimizers $U_\gamma+U_\gamma[\lambda]$ as $\lambda\to0$; and the hidden level $1-S_\gamma/S$ compares the Hardy-Sobolev best constant $S_\gamma$ with the classical Sobolev constant $S$. The proof uses the isometric lift to the cylinder $\mathbb{R}\times S^{N-1}$, where dilations become translations and the optimizer becomes a sech profile; there, spherical-harmonic projections and an improved Hardy inequality produce a non-zero low-mode projection for any minimizing sequence, which is what extracts a non-zero weak limit without translation invariance.

What would settle it

Compute $\Lambda(\gamma)$ and $C^{\mathrm{rad}}_{\mathrm{BE}}(\gamma)$ numerically at $\gamma=\gamma_0$ for $N=4$; if the defining equality $\Lambda(\gamma_0)=C^{\mathrm{rad}}_{\mathrm{BE}}(\gamma_0)$ has no solution or is violated, the strict comparison $C_{\mathrm{BE}}(\gamma)<\Lambda(\gamma)$ fails and the proof of attainment collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.1: for every $N\ge3$ and every $\gamma_0\le\gamma<(N-2)^2/4$, the infimum $C_{\mathrm{BE}}(\gamma)$ is attained. A minimizing sequence for the quotient is bounded, and after suitable dilations it has a non-zero weak limit; the proof shows the remainder vanishes strongly and that the limit is not a Hardy-Sobolev optimizer, so the limit is a genuine extremizer. In particular, for $N\ge4$ the threshold $\gamma_0$ lies below $\gamma_c^\star$, so the result covers the region where the third eigenspace of the linearized operator contains only spherical harmonics of degree $1$ and the earlier non-vanishing criterion is unavailable. The paper also shows that the radial Bianchi-Egnell constant is independent of $\gamma$, and that the comparisons $C_{\mathrm{BE}}(\gamma)\le C^{\mathrm{rad}}_{\mathrm{BE}}(\gamma)\le\Lambda(\gamma)$ together with $C_{\mathrm{BE}}(\gamma)<1-S_\gamma/S$ force the attainment.

Load-bearing premise

The argument relies on imported spectral facts about the linearized Hardy-Sobolev operator, namely that the gap between its second and third eigenvalues is exactly the stated $\Lambda(\gamma)$ and that the radial stability constant stays strictly below that gap for large enough $\gamma$; if either fact failed, the chain of strict inequalities that keeps minimizers away from the optimizer manifold would break.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every $N\ge3$ and $\gamma_0\le\gamma<(N-2)^2/4$, the stability inequality is sharp: some function outside the optimizer family attains $C_{\mathrm{BE}}(\gamma)$.
  • Because $C_{\mathrm{BE}}(\gamma)<1-S_\gamma/S$ holds on the stated range, a minimizing sequence cannot lose its mass to infinity by pure rescaling; the weak limit is non-zero.
  • The constant $\gamma_0$ for $N\ge4$ lies below $\gamma_c^\star$, so existence of an extremizer is established precisely in the parameter region where the degree-$2$ spherical-harmonic non-vanishing criterion is absent.
  • The radial Bianchi-Egnell constant is the same for every admissible $\gamma$, so radial stability is scale-rigid, while the full non-radial constant is achieved for the newly covered range.
  • The strict bounds below both the local and two-bubble critical levels imply the minimizer is isolated from both degeneracies: it neither converges to an optimizer nor splits into two bubbles.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the hidden-critical-level idea is transferable, the same kind of bound $C<\text{one constant}-\text{another}$ should locate the obstruction to non-zero weak limits in other non-translation-invariant sharp inequalities, such as weighted Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg inequalities.
  • For $N=3$, the threshold $\gamma_0$ exceeds $\gamma_c^\star$; a numerical computation of $C_{\mathrm{BE}}(\gamma)$ just above $\gamma_c^\star$ would indicate whether that restriction is artificial or a genuine dimensional transition.
  • The spherical-harmonic projection step suggests a general recipe: when translations are absent, project a minimizing sequence onto low spherical-harmonic modes and use an improved Hardy inequality; the number of modes needed may quantify the failure of translation invariance.
  • A direct corollary the paper does not spell out: the attained extremizer gives an explicit function at which the Hardy-Sobolev deficit is quadratically controlled by distance to the optimizer family, so the stability inequality is optimal with a realized equality case.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the sharp quantitative stability (Bianchi-Egnell) inequality for the Hardy-Sobolev inequality. It defines the best Bianchi-Egnell constant C_BE(gamma) as the infimum of the deficit functional divided by the squared distance to the manifold of all Hardy-Sobolev optimizers, and proves (Theorem 1.1) that for N >= 3 and gamma >= gamma_0, with gamma_0 defined in (1.10), this infimum is attained. The strategy follows the now-standard framework of König: the authors identify a local critical level, a two-bubble critical level, and an additional 'hidden' critical level 1 - S_gamma/S. Working in cylindrical coordinates, they prove that the radial best constant C_BE^rad(gamma) is independent of gamma, compute explicit two-bubble expansions, and use the hidden level to extract a nonzero weak limit from a minimizing sequence despite the lack of translation invariance. A case analysis then rule out loss of compactness and shows the weak limit is a genuine extremizer.

Significance. If the result holds, it is a substantial extension of König's existence theorem for the Sobolev inequality to the Hardy-Sobolev inequality, where translation invariance is lost and the third eigenspace of the linearized operator can contain only spherical harmonics of degree one. The paper also improves the radial-only attainability results of Wei-Wu and Deng-Shengbing-Wei for the Hardy-Sobolev case. The manuscript has clear strengths: Proposition 4.2 gives a self-contained two-bubble expansion in cylindrical coordinates that does not rely on the Kelvin transform, Proposition 3.1 proves the constancy of the radial Bianchi-Egnell constant by a clean scaling argument, and Lemma 5.1 exploits the hidden critical level to obtain a nonzero weak limit in a non-translation-invariant setting. The external inputs from Wei-Wu are explicitly identified, and the proof is not circular: no parameter is fitted to the targeted conclusion.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 1, Eq. (1.10)] For N >= 4, the threshold gamma_0 is defined as 'the point Lambda(gamma_0) = C_BE^rad(gamma_0)', which presupposes that this equation has a solution. The text states that Lambda is continuous and strictly increasing on (0, gamma_c^*) and that C_BE^rad is constant, but it does not prove that the constant value of C_BE^rad lies strictly between Lambda(0+) and Lambda(gamma_c^*) = 4/(N+4). Without this intermediate-value argument, the inequalities C_BE^rad(gamma) < Lambda(gamma) for gamma > gamma_0, and consequently the comparisons C_BE(gamma) < Lambda(gamma) and C_BE(gamma) < 1 - S_gamma/S, are not justified. The missing argument is short and appears recoverable from the explicit formula (3.2) together with [WW24, Proposition 4.1], but it must be included in the proof.
  2. [Section 5, Lemma 5.2] The proof of Lemma 5.2 is omitted with the statement that it follows from [Kön25] verbatim. This lemma is load-bearing: it is used in every case of the strong-convergence argument to decompose m(u_k) and hence dist(u_k, M_HS)^2 as max{m(v), m(f_k)} plus a vanishing error. Because the Hardy-Sobolev problem is not translation invariant and m(u) is a supremum over dilations only, the adaptation of König's proof to this setting is not self-evident. Please supply a proof, or give the exact statement in [Kön25] that covers this setting and explain the modifications needed for the Hardy-Sobolev metric and the reduced parameter family.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 5, Lemma 5.1, Step 1] The assumption stated as 'for every i in {1, ..., k_0}' should also include the radial projection i = 0: the subsequent estimate of m(P_0^1 phi_n) and the conclusion that phi_n -> 0 in L^{2*} require the i = 0 component to vanish in L^{2*}. Please correct the index range.
  2. [Section 4, Proposition 4.2(b)] The intermediate display ||v_s||_{L^{2*}}^{2*} = 2 + 2Q(s) + o(Q(s)) appears to be missing the factor 2* in the linear term. The final exponentiated formula is consistent with the correct expansion 2 + 2*2* Q(s) + o(Q(s)); please correct the intermediate display.
  3. [Section 5, proof of Theorem 1.1 (N = 3)] For N = 3, the proof states that Lemma 3.3 gives Lambda(gamma) < 1 - S_gamma/S for gamma in [gamma_0, ...), but Lemma 3.3(b) gives the strict inequality only for gamma > gamma_0; at gamma = gamma_0 equality holds in Lambda = 1 - S_gamma/S. The endpoint is still harmless because C_BE^rad(gamma_0) < Lambda(gamma_0), but this should be stated explicitly.
  4. [References] The bibliography entry [Kön25] has irregular formatting ('Tobias k¨onig, stability for the Sobolev inequality: Existence of a minimizer') and should be cleaned up; please also ensure that all citations to [K¨23] and [K¨25] match the reference list consistently.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: all load-bearing comparisons use externally sourced spectral gap and two-bubble levels, not the target constant.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks and does not reduce to its own inputs. The target quantity C_BE(γ) is bounded above by C^rad_BE(γ), which is shown in Proposition 3.1 to be constant by an explicit scaling equivalence (Lemma 3.2), and below the local critical level via the spectral gap Λ(γ) imported from Wei-Wu [WW24, Proposition 3.1] and the two-bubble level derived directly in Proposition 4.2. The threshold γ0 in (1.10) is defined by the equation Λ(γ0)=C^rad_BE(γ0); neither side of this equation is the target constant C_BE(γ), and C_BE enters afterwards only through the elementary inequality C_BE≤C^rad_BE. The hidden critical level C_BE<1−Sγ/S is obtained from Λ(γ)<1−Sγ/S proved elementarily in Lemma 3.3 together with C^rad_BE<Λ(γ), again with no parameter fitted to C_BE. The nonzero weak limit then follows from this strict inequality, and the exclusion of optimizers follows from C_BE<Λ(γ). All cited inputs are external works by Wei-Wu and Konig, not by the present authors, and they provide explicit formulas or machine-independent estimates rather than a self-citation chain. The only caveat is a rigor gap: for N≥4 the existence of a root of Λ(γ0)=C^rad_BE(γ0) is asserted without displaying the intermediate-value argument, although the root is recoverable from the cited monotonicity of Λ and constancy of C^rad_BE. That is an omitted justification, not a circular reduction, and it does not affect the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard Hardy-Sobolev theory, the cited spectral gap result of Wei-Wu, and the improved Hardy inequality proved in the appendix. No parameter is fitted to data. The only potentially understated premise is the existence of the root defining γ0 for N≥4.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Spectral gap formula Λ(γ) and C^rad_BE(γ)<Λ(γ) for γ>γ*_c, imported from Wei-Wu [WW24, Prop 3.1 and 4.1].
    Used to place C_BE(γ) below the local Bianchi-Egnell level and below the hidden level, ensuring the weak limit is not an optimizer (Eq. 3.2, Section 5).
  • domain assumption Existence and uniqueness of γ0 for N≥4 as the root of Λ(γ0)=C^rad_BE(γ0) with Λ increasing on (0,γ*_c).
    Definition (1.10) relies on this root without proof in the text; if it did not exist, the threshold and the proof for N≥4 would need modification.
  • standard math Improved Hardy inequality on the cylinder for functions orthogonal to low spherical harmonics (Lemma 6.6).
    Proved in the appendix; used in Lemma 5.1 to force a low spherical harmonic component in a minimizing sequence.
  • standard math Concentration-compactness principle of Lions and the 1D Gagliardo-Nirenberg-Sobolev inequality.
    Used in Lemma 5.1 and in bounding the minimizing sequence; standard tools.
  • domain assumption Characterization of optimizers of the Hardy-Sobolev inequality (Chou-Chu, Terracini).
    Defines M_HS and underlies the distance formulation in Lemma 2.2.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Existence of Bianchi-Egnell stability extremizer for the Hardy-Sobolev inequality." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/N3JOTKV3

@misc{pith2026250507039,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Existence of Bianchi-Egnell stability extremizer for the Hardy-Sobolev inequality},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/N3JOTKV3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.07039}
}
abstract

In this article, we prove the best Bianchi-Egnell constant for the Hardy-Sobolev (HS) inequality \begin{align*} C_{\tiny\mbox{{BE}}}(\gamma) := \inf_{{u \ \small \mbox{not an optimizer}}} \frac{\int_{\mathbb{R}^n} \left(|\nabla u|^2 - \frac{\gamma}{|x|^2}u^2\right) \ {\rm d}x - S_{\gamma}\|u\|_{L^{2^{\star}}}^2}{\mbox{dist} (u, \ \mbox{set of optimizers})^2}, \end{align*} is attained, extending the result of K\"onig [arXiv:2211.14185] for the classical Sobolev inequality (that corresponds to $\gamma = 0$). One of the main difficulties is that the third eigenspace of the linearized operator may contain only spherical harmonics of degree $1$, and hence, an essential non-vanishing criterion fails [arXiv:2210.08482]. This non-vanishing criterion is indispensable for proving the best Bianchi-Egnell constant $C_{\tiny\mbox{{BE}}}(\gamma) < C_{\tiny\mbox{{BE}}}^{\tiny\mbox{{loc}}}(\gamma)$ that prevents a minimizing sequence converging to one of the optimizers. In addition, not being translation invariant, extracting a non-zero weak limit from a minimizing sequence presents difficulties. We found another hidden critical level $C_{\tiny\mbox{{BE}}}(\gamma) <1 - \frac{S_{\gamma}}{S},$ where $S$ is the best Sobolev constant that plays a significant role in proving the existence of an extremizer. In particular, we show that there exists a $\gamma_0>0$ such that for $\gamma \geq \gamma_0,\ C_{\tiny\mbox{{BE}}}(\gamma)$ is attained. Moreover, we remark that there is a region $\gamma_0 \leq \gamma < \gamma_c^{\star},$ where the third eigenspace of the linearized operator contains only spherical harmonics of degree $1.$ Our result improves some of the results in Wei-Wu [arXiv:2308.04667] corresponding to the HS inequality.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Existence of Yamabe stability optimizers

    math.DG 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    For closed manifolds with positive Yamabe invariant below the sphere value, stability optimizers exist whenever the stability constant lies strictly below a local and a one-bubble threshold, and the bubble-threshold i...

  2. Optimal Stability Bounds, Minimizers, and Critical Points for a Critical Nonlocal Sobolev Inequality on the Heisenberg Group

    math.AP 2026-08 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper claims optimal Bianchi-Egnell constants for a nonlocal Sobolev inequality on the Heisenberg group, but the key strict spectral bound is unproved.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Probl \`e mes isoperimetriques et espaces de Sobolev

    Thierry Aubin. Probl \`e mes isoperimetriques et espaces de Sobolev . J. Differ. Geom. , 11:573--598, 1976

  2. [2]

    Stability in Gagliardo - Nirenberg - Sobolev inequalities: flows, regularity and the entropy method

    Matteo Bonforte, Jean Dolbeault, Bruno Nazaret, and Nikita Simonov. Stability in Gagliardo - Nirenberg - Sobolev inequalities: flows, regularity and the entropy method. Preprint, arXiv :2007.03674 [math. AP ] (2020), 2020

  3. [3]

    Constructive stability results in interpolation inequalities and explicit improvements of decay rates of fast diffusion equations

    Matteo Bonforte, Jean Dolbeault, Bruno Nazaret, and Nikita Simonov. Constructive stability results in interpolation inequalities and explicit improvements of decay rates of fast diffusion equations. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. , 43(3-4):1070--1089, 2023

  4. [4]

    A note on the S obolev inequality

    Gabriele Bianchi and Henrik Egnell. A note on the S obolev inequality. J. Funct. Anal. , 100(1):18--24, 1991

  5. [5]

    Sharp quantitative stability of Poincar \'e - Sobolev inequality in the hyperbolic space and applications to fast diffusion flows

    Mousomi Bhakta, Debdip Ganguly, Debabrata Karmakar, and Saikat Mazumdar. Sharp quantitative stability of Poincar \'e - Sobolev inequality in the hyperbolic space and applications to fast diffusion flows. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. , 64(1):47, 2025. Id/No 23

  6. [6]

    Ha\"im Brezis and Elliott H. Lieb. Sobolev inequalities with remainder terms. J. Funct. Anal. , 62(1):73--86, 1985

  7. [7]

    On the best constant for a weighted Sobolev - Hardy inequality

    Kai-Seng Chou and Chiu-Wing Chu. On the best constant for a weighted Sobolev - Hardy inequality. J. Lond. Math. Soc., II. Ser. , 48(1):137--151, 1993

  8. [8]

    Caffarelli- Kohn - Nirenberg identities, inequalities and their stabilities

    Cristian Cazacu, Joshua Flynn, Nguyen Lam, and Guozhen Lu. Caffarelli- Kohn - Nirenberg identities, inequalities and their stabilities. J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) , 182:253--284, 2024

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    Cianchi, N

    A. Cianchi, N. Fusco, F. Maggi, and A. Pratelli. The sharp Sobolev inequality in quantitative form. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) , 11(5):1105--1139, 2009

  2. [10]

    Frank, and Tobias Weth

    Shibing Chen, Rupert L. Frank, and Tobias Weth. Remainder terms in the fractional Sobolev inequality. Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 62(4):1381--1397, 2013

  3. [11]

    Caffarelli, R

    L. Caffarelli, R. Kohn, and Louis Nirenberg. First order interpolation inequalities with weights. Compos. Math. , 53:259--275, 1984

  4. [12]

    Stability of Hardy - Littlewood - Sobolev inequalities with explicit lower bounds

    Lu Chen, Guozhen Lu, and Hanli Tang. Stability of Hardy - Littlewood - Sobolev inequalities with explicit lower bounds. Adv. Math. , 450:28, 2024. Id/No 109778

  5. [13]

    On the Caffarelli - Kohn - Nirenberg inequalities: sharp constants, existence (and nonexistence), and symmetry of extremal functions

    Florin Catrina and Zhi-Qiang Wang. On the Caffarelli - Kohn - Nirenberg inequalities: sharp constants, existence (and nonexistence), and symmetry of extremal functions. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. , 54(2):229--258, 2001

  6. [14]

    Jean Dolbeault and Maria J. Esteban. Hardy- Littlewood - Sobolev and related inequalities: stability. In The physics and mathematics of Elliott Lieb. The 90th anniversary. Volume I , pages 247--268. Berlin: European Mathematical Society (EMS), 2022

  7. [15]

    Esteban, Alessio Figalli, Rupert L

    Jean Dolbeault, Maria J. Esteban, Alessio Figalli, Rupert L. Frank, and Michael Loss. Sharp stability for Sobolev and log- Sobolev inequalities, with optimal dimensional dependence. Camb. J. Math. , 13(2):359--430, 2025

  8. [16]

    Esteban, and Michael Loss

    Jean Dolbeault, Maria J. Esteban, and Michael Loss. Symmetry of extremals of functional inequalities via spectral estimates for linear operators. J. Math. Phys. , 53(9):095204, 18, 2012

  9. [17]

    Esteban, and Michael Loss

    Jean Dolbeault, Maria J. Esteban, and Michael Loss. Rigidity versus symmetry breaking via nonlinear flows on cylinders and Euclidean spaces. Invent. Math. , 206(2):397--440, 2016

  10. [18]

    Esteban, Ari Laptev, and Michael Loss

    Jean Dolbeault, Maria J. Esteban, Ari Laptev, and Michael Loss. One-dimensional G agliardo- N irenberg- S obolev inequalities: remarks on duality and flows. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) , 90(2):525--550, 2014

  11. [19]

    Esteban, Michael Loss, and Gabriella Tarantello

    Jean Dolbeault, Maria J. Esteban, Michael Loss, and Gabriella Tarantello. On the symmetry of extremals for the Caffarelli - Kohn - Nirenberg inequalities. Adv. Nonlinear Stud. , 9(4):713--726, 2009

  12. [20]

    Esteban, and Gabriella Tarantello

    Jean Dolbeault, Maria J. Esteban, and Gabriella Tarantello. The role of Onofri type inequalities in the symmetry properties of extremals for Caffarelli - Kohn - Nirenberg inequalities, in two space dimensions. Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa, Cl. Sci. (5) , 7(2):313--341, 2008

  13. [21]

    Non-degeneracy, stability and symmetry for the fractional Caffarelli - Kohn - Nirenberg inequality

    Nicola De Nitti, Federico Glaudo, and Tobias K \"o nig. Non-degeneracy, stability and symmetry for the fractional Caffarelli - Kohn - Nirenberg inequality. Preprint, arXiv :2403.02303 [math. AP ], 2024

  14. [22]

    Stability results for Sobolev , logarithmic Sobolev , and related inequalities

    Jean Dolbeault. Stability results for Sobolev , logarithmic Sobolev , and related inequalities. Preprint, arXiv :2411.13271 [math. AP ], 2024

  15. [23]

    Existence of minimizers of the stability constant of caffarelli–kohn–nirenberg inequality

    Tian Xingliang Deng Shengbing and Wei Juncheng. Existence of minimizers of the stability constant of caffarelli–kohn–nirenberg inequality. 2025

  16. [24]

    Quantitative stability for minimizing Yamabe metrics

    Max Engelstein, Robin Neumayer, and Luca Spolaor. Quantitative stability for minimizing Yamabe metrics. Trans. Am. Math. Soc., Ser. B , 9:395--414, 2022

  17. [25]

    Stability in geometric and functional inequalities

    Alessio Figalli. Stability in geometric and functional inequalities. In European Congress of Mathematics. Proceedings of the 6th ECM congress, Krak\'ow, Poland, July 2--7 July, 2012 , pages 585--599. Z \"u rich: European Mathematical Society (EMS), 2013

  18. [26]

    Gradient stability for the Sobolev inequality: the case \(p 2\)

    Alessio Figalli and Robin Neumayer. Gradient stability for the Sobolev inequality: the case \(p 2\) . J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) , 21(2):319--354, 2019

  19. [27]

    Frank and Jonas W

    Rupert L. Frank and Jonas W. Peteranderl. Degenerate stability of the Caffarelli - Kohn - Nirenberg inequality along the Felli - Schneider curve. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. , 63(2):33, 2024. Id/No 44

  20. [28]

    Rupert L. Frank. Degenerate stability of some Sobolev inequalities. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar \'e C, Anal. Non Lin \'e aire , 39(6):1459--1484, 2022

  21. [29]

    Rupert L. Frank. The sharp Sobolev inequality and its stability: an introduction. In Geometric and analytic aspects of functional variational principles. Cetraro, Italy, June 2022. Lecture notes , pages 1--64. Cham: Springer; Florence: Fondazione CIME, 2024

  22. [30]

    Perturbation results of critical elliptic equations of Caffarelli - Kohn - Nirenberg type

    Veronica Felli and Matthias Schneider. Perturbation results of critical elliptic equations of Caffarelli - Kohn - Nirenberg type. J. Differ. Equations , 191(1):121--142, 2003

  23. [31]

    Sharp gradient stability for the Sobolev inequality

    Alessio Figalli and Yi Ru-Ya Zhang. Sharp gradient stability for the Sobolev inequality. Duke Math. J. , 171(12):2407--2459, 2022

  24. [32]

    Sobolev inequalities for the Hardy - Schr \"o dinger operator: extremals and critical dimensions

    Nassif Ghoussoub and Fr \'e d \'e ric Robert. Sobolev inequalities for the Hardy - Schr \"o dinger operator: extremals and critical dimensions. Bull. Math. Sci. , 6(1):89--144, 2016

  25. [33]

    On the sharp constant in the B ianchi- E gnell stability inequality

    Tobias K\"onig. On the sharp constant in the B ianchi- E gnell stability inequality. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. , 55(4):2070--2075, 2023

  26. [34]

    Tobias könig, stability for the sobolev inequality: Existence of a minimizer

    Tobias K\"onig. Tobias könig, stability for the sobolev inequality: Existence of a minimizer. J. Eur. Math. Soc., published online first , (2025)

  27. [35]

    An exceptional property of the one-dimensional Bianchi - Egnell inequality

    Tobias K \"o nig. An exceptional property of the one-dimensional Bianchi - Egnell inequality. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. , 63(5):21, 2024. Id/No 123

  28. [36]

    Elliott H. Lieb. Sharp constants in the Hardy - Littlewood - Sobolev and related inequalities. Ann. Math. (2) , 118:349--374, 1983

  29. [37]

    P.-L. Lions. The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus of variations. T he locally compact case. I . Ann. Inst. H. Poincar\'e Anal. Non Lin\'eaire , 1(2):109--145, 1984

  30. [38]

    P. L. Lions. The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus of variations. the locally compact case, part 2. Annales de l'I.H.P. Analyse non linéaire , 1(4):223--283, 1984

  31. [39]

    M \"u ller

    C. M \"u ller. Spherical harmonics , volume 17 of Lect. Notes Math. Springer, Cham, 1966

  32. [40]

    A note on strong-form stability for the Sobolev inequality

    Robin Neumayer. A note on strong-form stability for the Sobolev inequality. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. , 59(1):8, 2020. Id/No 25

  33. [41]

    Stability of Sobolev inequalities on Riemannian manifolds with Ricci curvature lower bounds

    Francesco Nobili and Ivan Yuri Violo. Stability of Sobolev inequalities on Riemannian manifolds with Ricci curvature lower bounds. Adv. Math. , 440:58, 2024. Id/No 109521

  34. [42]

    The role of the G reen's function in a nonlinear elliptic equation involving the critical S obolev exponent

    Olivier Rey. The role of the G reen's function in a nonlinear elliptic equation involving the critical S obolev exponent. J. Funct. Anal. , 89(1):1--52, 1990

  35. [43]

    Nondegeneracy of positive solutions to nonlinear H ardy- S obolev equations

    Fr\'ed\'eric Robert. Nondegeneracy of positive solutions to nonlinear H ardy- S obolev equations. Adv. Nonlinear Anal. , 6(2):237--242, 2017

  36. [44]

    Extended Caffarelli - Kohn - Nirenberg inequalities, and remainders, stability, and superweights for \(L^ p \) -weighted Hardy inequalities

    Michael Ruzhansky, Durvudkhan Suragan, and Nurgissa Yessirkegenov. Extended Caffarelli - Kohn - Nirenberg inequalities, and remainders, stability, and superweights for \(L^ p \) -weighted Hardy inequalities. Trans. Am. Math. Soc., Ser. B , 5:32--62, 2018

  37. [45]

    B. Ruffini. Stability theorems for Gagliardo - Nirenberg - Sobolev inequalities: a reduction principle to the radial case. Rev. Mat. Complut. , 27(2):509--539, 2014

  38. [46]

    Harmonic analysis , volume Part 3 of A Comprehensive Course in Analysis

    Barry Simon. Harmonic analysis , volume Part 3 of A Comprehensive Course in Analysis . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2015

  39. [47]

    Stein and Guido Weiss

    Elias M. Stein and Guido Weiss. Introduction to F ourier analysis on E uclidean spaces , volume No. 32 of Princeton Mathematical Series . Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1971

  40. [48]

    Best constant in Sobolev inequality

    Giorgio Talenti. Best constant in Sobolev inequality. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4) , 110:353--372, 1976

  41. [49]

    On positive entire solutions to a class of equations with a singular coefficient and critical exponent

    Susanna Terracini. On positive entire solutions to a class of equations with a singular coefficient and critical exponent. Adv. Differ. Equ. , 1(2):241--264, 1996

  42. [50]

    Minimax theorems , volume 24 of Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and their Applications

    Michel Willem. Minimax theorems , volume 24 of Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and their Applications . Birkh\" a user Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 1996

  43. [51]

    On the stability of the Caffarelli - Kohn - Nirenberg inequality

    Juncheng Wei and Yuanze Wu. On the stability of the Caffarelli - Kohn - Nirenberg inequality. Math. Ann. , 384(3-4):1509--1546, 2022

  44. [52]

    Stability of the Caffarelli - Kohn - Nirenberg inequality: the existence of minimizers

    Juncheng Wei and Yuanze Wu. Stability of the Caffarelli - Kohn - Nirenberg inequality: the existence of minimizers. Math. Z. , 308(4):26, 2024. Id/No 64

  45. [53]

    Quantitative stability for the Caffarelli - Kohn - Nirenberg inequality

    Yuxuan Zhou and Wenming Zou. Quantitative stability for the Caffarelli - Kohn - Nirenberg inequality. Preprint, arXiv :2312.15735 [math. AP ], 2023

  46. [54]

    Degenerate stability of critical points of the Caffarelli - Kohn - Nirenberg inequality along the Felli - Schneider curve

    Yuxuan Zhou and Wenming Zou. Degenerate stability of critical points of the Caffarelli - Kohn - Nirenberg inequality along the Felli - Schneider curve. Preprint, arXiv :2407.10849 [math. AP ], 2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.