Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 60 references

Opportunities and Applications of GenAI in Smart Cities: A User-Centric Survey

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that conversational generative AI can make smart-city data usable by three distinct audiences—citizens, operators, and planners—and surveys the systems that already point in that direction.

desk verdict Useful user-centric taxonomy in a competent survey, but the 'first' claim and missing methodology need fixing. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.08034 v2 pith:2CCIWVIJ submitted 2025-05-12 cs.OH

Ankit Shetgaonkar , Dipen Pradhan , Lakshit Arora , Sanjay Surendranath Girija , Shashank Kapoor , Aman Raj This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.OH
keywords generativeAIsmartcitieslargelanguagemodelsconversationalinterfacesurbandigitaltwinsInternetofThingssyntheticdatagenerationuser-centrictaxonomy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Smart cities generate more data from IoT sensors, official records, and digital twins than most people can actually use. This survey argues that conversational generative AI can close that gap by letting users ask questions in plain language and receive grounded, situation-aware answers. Its organizing claim is that GenAI applications in cities serve three user archetypes: citizens seeking services and everyday information, operators managing live urban systems, and planners testing long-term scenarios. The paper reviews deployed and proposed systems for each group and connects them to the existing data foundation of city records, IoT streams, and Urban Digital Twins. It positions itself as the first comprehensive survey of GenAI for smart cities organized from this user-centric perspective.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing structure is the three archetypes—Citizens, Operators/Managers, and Planners—each with distinct information needs and interaction styles. The mechanism that carries the argument is the conversational interface built on Large Language Models, grounded by Retrieval-Augmented Generation in city-controlled documents or IoT and Digital Twin data, and guarded by human-in-the-loop review where factual accuracy is critical. The paper uses this machinery to sort a wide range of proposed and deployed systems into a coherent map, and to show how each archetype can draw on the common city data foundation of official records, sensor streams, and Urban Digital Twins.

What would settle it

A systematic census of GenAI smart-city applications—starting from the paper's own citations and a broad literature search—that counts the intended user for each would settle the claim; finding a substantial share serving roles outside the three archetypes, such as emergency first responders or private developers, would falsify the organizing taxonomy.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that the same underlying data foundation can serve three distinct urban roles through natural-language interfaces, and that the triad of Citizens, Operators, and Planners is the right lens for organizing GenAI applications in smart cities. For citizens, it finds deployed city-service chatbots with reported gains such as higher satisfaction, faster first-contact resolution, and lower service costs, plus proposals for transit, routing, and air-quality assistance. For operators, it identifies LLM-based systems that summarize incidents, explain anomalies, and support grid, water, and traffic management by grounding answers in real-time data. For planners, it collects simulation and synthetic-data tools that generate traffic scenarios, visualize proposed spaces, and test what-if policies before real-world implementation. The paper claims to be the first comprehensive summarization of these techniques from this user-centric viewpoint.

Load-bearing premise

The survey's organization rests on the claim that Citizens, Operators, and Planners are the three user types that matter for GenAI in smart cities, and the paper offers no systematic evidence that these categories cover the applications that actually exist.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Cities that adopt the three-archetype framing can organize GenAI strategy into three tracks: citizen-facing grounded chatbots, operator-facing real-time interrogation and anomaly explanation, and planner-facing simulation and synthetic scenario tools.
  • The cited deployments indicate that retrieval-augmented generation and human review are the main practical safeguards against hallucination; without them, factual errors can break trust, as the New York City chatbot episode cited in the paper shows.
  • Existing municipal data—official records, IoT streams, and Urban Digital Twins—is treated as sufficient raw material for first-generation applications, so near-term pilots do not require new city infrastructure.
  • Synthetic data generation is a corollary opportunity: planners can test policies and operators can fill sensor gaps in simulation before committing to real-world changes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The three-archetype taxonomy may understate other consequential users of urban data, such as emergency first responders, private developers, tourists, and civic technologists; a census of actual deployments would show whether the frame is too narrow.
  • The city-reported metrics cited in the paper—for example 94% satisfaction, 42% first-contact resolution, and 28% cost reduction—could be assembled into a shared benchmark for future citizen-facing GenAI deployments, though the paper itself does not standardize them.
  • If retrieval grounding and human-in-the-loop review remain the core safeguards, the same deployment pattern likely applies beyond cities to any public-sector organization putting LLMs in front of official documents.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper is a survey of generative AI (GenAI) applications in smart cities, organized around three user archetypes: citizens, operators/managers, and urban planners. It reviews the foundational technologies (IoT, Digital Twins, GenAI), presents example applications for each archetype, and discusses challenges and future directions. The authors claim that this is the first paper to survey GenAI applications in smart cities from the perspective of these three user archetypes, with a particular focus on conversational interfaces built on urban data foundations.

Significance. If the firstness claim and the survey's coverage are substantiated, the paper would provide a useful synthesis for researchers and practitioners: the user-archetype lens is a sensible organizing principle, the catalog of recent systems (UrbanGPT, CityGPT, IncidentResponseGPT, VayuBuddy, ACQAR, etc.) is timely, and the discussion of RAG and human-in-the-loop mitigation for hallucination reflects current practice. The paper also names concrete pitfalls (e.g., the NYC MyCity chatbot failure). However, the significance is conditional on verifying the novelty claim through a reproducible search protocol and on correcting the citation of performance statistics that currently come from a secondary source. The survey does not contain derivations or machine-checked proofs, but that is not a weakness for a survey; its value rests on coverage, accuracy, and framing.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section I and Abstract] The central claim that this is "the first paper to the best of our knowledge" and "the first comprehensive summarization" is unsupported: the manuscript provides no literature search protocol, no database coverage, no inclusion/exclusion criteria, and no explicit differentiation from prior surveys that overlap substantially, such as Xu et al. [9], Zhang et al. [16], Salierno et al. [23], Wang et al. [31], Feng et al. [25], and Xu et al. [43]. Without a systematic, reproducible methodology or a concrete comparison showing how the present survey is distinct from these existing works, the firstness claim remains an assertion rather than a demonstrated contribution.
  2. [Section III.A] The performance statistics for city deployments are not backed by primary sources: the 94% user satisfaction rate for Barcelona, the 42% increase in first-time resolution and 28% cost reduction for Vienna are all attributed to Ref. [23], which is a secondary encyclopedia article, and no independent verification is cited. Because these numbers are used as evidence that conversational GenAI yields measurable operational benefits, the paper should either cite the original city reports or explicitly flag these as secondary-source claims that require verification.
  3. [Section III.B and III.C] The stated scope of the survey is "conversational interfaces," but several entries in the operator and planner sections are non-conversational predictive or synthetic-data systems: LLMAir [45] performs air-quality prediction, STLLM [59] is an edge-computing PM2.5 forecaster, UrbanGPT [8] is a spatiotemporal traffic-flow predictor, and PlacemakingAI [51] and the Land Use Configuration GAN [31] are generative visualization tools rather than conversational interfaces. The paper should either justify how these systems fit under the conversational-interface framing (e.g., as backend components of a conversational assistant) or narrow the stated scope so the survey's coverage matches its framing.
  4. [Section III introduction] The selection of Citizens, Operators, and Planners as "the three critical user archetypes" is asserted without supporting evidence or a discussion of how the archetype taxonomy was derived, and the paper does not explain how representative examples were chosen for each group. A survey's usefulness depends on the representativeness of its examples; the authors should provide a brief rationale for the taxonomy and for the application-selection process, or acknowledge the selection as illustrative rather than systematic.
minor comments (5)
  1. [References] Reference [52] contains a typo: "WWang" should be "Wang."
  2. [Section III.A] The sentence on Vienna's results is ambiguous: "a 42% increase [23] in first-time resolution" should specify whether this is a 42% increase in the first-time resolution rate or a 42% increase in the number of cases resolved on first contact.
  3. [Section III.B] The text reads "UrbanGPT UrbanGPT [8]" with a duplicated model name; one occurrence should be removed.
  4. [Section II.D] In the sentence "Large Language Models (LLMs) [14] - based on Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPT) [9]", the citation [9] appears to be a generic GenAI/urban digital twin reference rather than the foundational GPT reference; this citation should be corrected or removed.
  5. [Various] The manuscript contains several minor typographical spacing issues (e.g., "S mart", "s trategic" in the abstract and body) that should be cleaned up before publication.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: this survey contains no derivation to reduce, and the cited self-references are peripheral rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

This is a survey/review paper; it contains no mathematical derivations, fitted parameters, or quantitative predictions whose outputs could be shown to equal their inputs by construction. The central contribution is the bibliographic novelty claim stated in the Abstract and Section I ('We believe this work represents the first comprehensive summarization of GenAI techniques for Smart Cities from the lens of the critical users in a Smart City' and 'This is the first paper to the best of our knowledge that talks about GenAI applications in the context of the three main user archetypes'). A novelty claim, even if unsupported by a stated search protocol or explicit differentiation from prior surveys, is not a circular derivation: it does not reduce to a fitted parameter, an ansatz, or a self-referential definition. The paper's two self-citations, [21] (Girija et al., cited in Section IV-A for computational overhead and cost) and [56] (Raj et al., cited in Section III-B for multimodal disaster-response data), are peripheral supporting references; neither is a load-bearing premise of the survey's organization or conclusions. The three user archetypes introduced in Section III are an organizing taxonomy, not a result derived from the surveyed applications, so no self-definitional loop exists. The only substantive caveat is that the 'first' claim is asserted rather than demonstrated against prior surveys such as Xu et al. [9], Zhang et al. [16], and Salierno et al. [23], but that is a novelty-verification gap, not circularity. Therefore the appropriate circularity score is 0, with no circular steps identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This survey introduces no new models or fit parameters. Its load-bearing assumptions are about the completeness of its user taxonomy, the accuracy of secondary-source metrics, and the representativeness of its selected examples.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The three user archetypes (citizens, operators, planners) are the critical users of smart city GenAI applications.
    Section III introduces these three archetypes without evidence that they are exhaustive or mutually exclusive, and the entire survey structure depends on this categorization.
  • domain assumption The cited secondary sources accurately report deployment metrics, such as Barcelona's 94% satisfaction and Vienna's 42% first-time resolution increase.
    These figures are taken from an encyclopedia article [23] and a government blog [38], not from primary evaluations, and the survey does not verify them.
  • domain assumption The selected examples are representative of the broader landscape of GenAI applications in smart cities.
    The survey chooses specific city deployments and models without a systematic sampling method, implying they represent common practice.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Opportunities and Applications of GenAI in Smart Cities: A User-Centric Survey." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2CCIWVIJ

@misc{pith2026250508034,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Opportunities and Applications of GenAI in Smart Cities: A User-Centric Survey},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2CCIWVIJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.08034}
}
read the original abstract

The proliferation of IoT in cities, combined with Digital Twins, creates a rich data foundation for Smart Cities aimed at improving urban life and operations. Generative AI (GenAI) significantly enhances this potential, moving beyond traditional AI analytics and predictions by processing multimodal content and generating novel outputs like text and simulations. Using specialized or foundational models, GenAI's natural language abilities such as Natural Language Understanding (NLU) and Natural Language Generation (NLG) can power tailored applications and unified interfaces, dramatically lowering barriers for users interacting with complex smart city systems. In this paper, we focus on GenAI applications based on conversational interfaces within the context of three critical user archetypes in a Smart City - Citizens, Operators and Planners. We identify and review GenAI models and techniques that have been proposed or deployed for various urban subsystems in the contexts of these user archetypes. We also consider how GenAI can be built on the existing data foundation of official city records, IoT data streams and Urban Digital Twins. We believe this work represents the first comprehensive summarization of GenAI techniques for Smart Cities from the lens of the critical users in a Smart City.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.08034 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Opportunities and applications of Generat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [9]

    Leveraging Generative AI for Urban Digital Twins: A Scoping Review on the Autonomous Generation of Ur ban Data, Scenarios, Designs, and 3D City Models for Smart Ci ty Advancement

    Xu, Haowen, et al. “Leveraging Generative AI for Urban Digital Twins: A Scoping Review on the Autonomous Generation of Ur ban Data, Scenarios, Designs, and 3D City Models for Smart Ci ty Advancement.” Urban Informatics, vol. 3, no. 1, Oct. 2024, p. 29. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1007/s44212-024-00060-w

    doi:10.1007/s44212-024-00060-w 2024

  2. [16]

    Towards Urban General Intelligence: A Review and Outlook of Urban Foundation Models

    Zhang, Weijia, et al. Towards Urban General Intelligence: A Review and Outlook of Urban Foundation Models. arXiv, 2024. DO I.org (Datacite), https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2402.01749

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.01749 2024

  3. [23]

    Generative AI and Large L anguage Models in Industry 5.0: Shaping Smarter Sustainable Cities

    Salierno, Giulio, et al. “Generative AI and Large L anguage Models in Industry 5.0: Shaping Smarter Sustainable Cities.” Encyclopedia, vol. 5, no. 1, Feb. 2025, p. 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5010030

    doi:10.3390/encyclopedia5010030 2025

  4. [31]

    Towards Automated Urban Plann ing: When Generative and ChatGPT-like AI Meets Urban Planning

    Wang, Dongjie, et al. Towards Automated Urban Plann ing: When Generative and ChatGPT-like AI Meets Urban Planning . arXiv, 2023. DOI.org (Datacite), https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2304.03892

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.03892 2023

  5. [25]

    CityGPT: Empowering Urban Spatial Cognition of Large Language Models

    Feng, Jie, et al. CityGPT: Empowering Urban Spatial Cognition of Large Language Models. arXiv, 2024. DOI.org (Datacite), https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2406.13948

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.13948 2024

  6. [43]

    Urban Generative Intelligence (U GI): A Foundational Platform for Agents in Embodied City Environment

    Xu, Fengli, et al. Urban Generative Intelligence (U GI): A Foundational Platform for Agents in Embodied City Environment. a rXiv, 2023. DOI.org (Datacite), https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2312.11813

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.11813 2023

  7. [45]

    LLMAir: Adaptive Reprogramming Large Language Model for Air Quality Prediction

    Fan, Jinxiao, et al. “LLMAir: Adaptive Reprogramming Large Language Model for Air Quality Prediction.” 2024 IEEE 30th I nternational Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS), IEEE, 2024, pp. 423–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPADS63350.2024.00062

    arXiv 2024

  8. [59]

    Edge Computing-Enabled Secur e Forecasting Nationwide Industry PM2.5 with LLM in the Heterogen eous Network

    Yin, Changkui, et al. “Edge Computing-Enabled Secur e Forecasting Nationwide Industry PM2.5 with LLM in the Heterogen eous Network.” Electronics, vol. 13, no. 13, June 2024, p. 2581. D OI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13132581

    work page doi:10.3390/electronics13132581 2024

  9. [8]

    UrbanGPT: Spatio-Temporal La rge Language Models

    Li, Zhonghang, et al. “UrbanGPT: Spatio-Temporal La rge Language Models.” Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Confere nce on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, ACM, 2024, pp. 5351–62. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1145/3637528.3671578

    arXiv 2024

  10. [51]

    PlacemakingAI : Participatory Urban Design with Generative Adversarial Networks

    Kim, Dongyun, et al. PlacemakingAI : Participatory Urban Design with Generative Adversarial Networks. 2022, pp. 485–94. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.caadria.2022.2.485

    work page doi:10.52842/conf.caadria.2022.2.485 2022

Show all 60 references
  1. [1]

    Artificial Intelligence-Enabl ed Metaverse for Sustainable Smart Cities: Technologies, Application s, Challenges, and Future Directions

    Lifelo, Zita, et al. “Artificial Intelligence-Enabl ed Metaverse for Sustainable Smart Cities: Technologies, Application s, Challenges, and Future Directions.” Electronics, vol. 13, no. 24, D ec. 2024, p. 4874. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13244874

    2024 doi

  2. [2]

    Artificial Intelligence in Smart Cities—Applications, Barriers, and Future Directions: A Review

    Wolniak, Radosław, and Kinga Stecuła. “Artificial Intelligence in Smart Cities—Applications, Barriers, and Future Directions: A Review.” Smart Cities, vol. 7, no. 3, June 2024, pp. 1346–89. DOI. org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7030057

    2024 doi

  3. [3]

    Integration of IoT-Enabled Technologies and Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Smart City Scenari o: Recent Advancements and Future Trends

    Alahi, Md Eshrat E., et al. “Integration of IoT-Enabled Technologies and Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Smart City Scenari o: Recent Advancements and Future Trends.” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 11, May 2023, p. 5206. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.3390/s23115206

    2023 doi

  4. [4]

    IoT Based Smart C ities

    Rajab, Husam, and Tibor Cinkelr. “IoT Based Smart C ities.” 2018 International Symposium on Networks, Computers and Communications (ISNCC), IEEE, 2018, pp. 1–4. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1109/ISNCC.2018.8530997

    2018

  5. [5]

    Public Service with Generative AI: Exploring Features and Applications

    Aryfiyanto et. al.. “Public Service with Generative AI: Exploring Features and Applications.” 2024 7th International Conferenc e of Computer and Informatics Engineering (IC2IE), IEEE, 2024, pp. 1– 7. DOI.org https://doi.org/10.1109/IC2IE63342.2024.10747963

    2024

  6. [6]

    UNCTAD Handbook of statistics 2022

    United Nations Conference on Trade And Development. UNCTAD Handbook of statistics 2022

    2022

  7. [7]

    World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision

    United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2019). World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision. ST/ESA/SER.A/420

    2019

  8. [10]

    Fang, Shiyu & Liu, Jiaqi & Ding, Mingyu & Cui, Yiming & Lv, Chen & Hang, Peng & Sun, Jian. (2025). Towards Interactive and Learnable Cooperative Driving Automation: a Large Language Mo del-Driven Decision-Making Framework. IEEE Transactions on Veh icular Technology. PP. 1-12. ...

    2025

  9. [11]

    Smart City Di gital Twins

    Mohammadi, Neda, and John E. Taylor. “Smart City Di gital Twins.” 2017 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelli gence (SSCI), IEEE, 2017, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/SSCI.2017.8285439

    2017

  10. [12]

    Multi-Modal Generative Adversaria l Networks for Traffic Event Detection in Smart Cities

    Chen, Qi, et al. “Multi-Modal Generative Adversaria l Networks for Traffic Event Detection in Smart Cities.” Expert Sy stems with Applications, vol. 177, Sept. 2021, p. 114939. DOI. org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114939

    2021

  11. [13]

    Smart City Digital Twin F ramework for Real- Time Multi-Data Integration and Wide Public Distrib ution

    Adreani, Lorenzo, et al. “Smart City Digital Twin F ramework for Real- Time Multi-Data Integration and Wide Public Distrib ution.” IEEE Access, vol. 12, 2024, pp. 76277–303. DOI.org (Cros sref), https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3406795

    2024

  12. [14]

    ‘Attention Is All You Need’

    Vaswani, Ashish, et al. ‘Attention Is All You Need’. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, edited by I. Guyon et al., vol. 30, Curran Associates, Inc., 2017, https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/3f5ee243547d ee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Paper.pdf

    2017

  13. [15]

    Urban Chatter: Exploring t he Potential of ChatGPT-like and Generative AI in Enhancing Planning Support

    Jiang, Huaxiong, et al. “Urban Chatter: Exploring t he Potential of ChatGPT-like and Generative AI in Enhancing Planning Support.” Cities, vol. 158, Mar. 2025, p. 105701. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.105701

    2025

  14. [17]

    Generative Spatial Artifici al Intelligence for Sustainable Smart Cities: A Pioneering Large Flow M odel for Urban Digital Twin

    Huang, Jeffrey, et al. “Generative Spatial Artifici al Intelligence for Sustainable Smart Cities: A Pioneering Large Flow M odel for Urban Digital Twin.” Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, vol. 24, Mar. 2025, p. 100526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2025.100526

    2025

  15. [18]

    A Survey of Generative AI f or Intelligent Transportation Systems: Road Transportation Perspec tive

    Yan, Huan, and Yong Li. A Survey of Generative AI f or Intelligent Transportation Systems: Road Transportation Perspec tive. arXiv, 2023. DOI.org (Datacite), https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2312.08248

    2023 doi arXiv

  16. [19]

    Exploiting IoT and Big Data Analytics: Defining Smart Digital City Using Real-Time Urban D ata

    Rathore, M. Mazhar, et al. “Exploiting IoT and Big Data Analytics: Defining Smart Digital City Using Real-Time Urban D ata.” Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 40, July 2018, pp. 600–10. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.022

    2018 doi

  17. [20]

    Equipping Participation Formats with Generative AI: A Case Study Predicting the Future of a Metropolitan City in the Year 2040

    Von Brackel-Schmidt, Constantin, et al. “Equipping Participation Formats with Generative AI: A Case Study Predicting the Future of a Metropolitan City in the Year 2040.” HCI in Business, Government and Organizations, edited by Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah and Keng Leng Siau, vol. 14720,...

    2024 doi

  18. [21]

    Optimizing LLMs for Resource- Constrained Environments: A Survey of Model Compression Techniques

    Girija, Sanjay Surendranath, et al. Optimizing LLMs for Resource- Constrained Environments: A Survey of Model Compression Techniques. arXiv:2505.02309, arXiv, 8 May 2025. arXiv.org, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.02309

    2025 doi arXiv

  19. [22]

    Generative AI for Power Grid Operations

    Choi, Seong, et al. Generative AI for Power Grid Operations. NREL/TP- -5D00-91176, 2477920, MainId:92954, 13 Nov. 2024, p . NREL/TP-- 5D00-91176, 2477920, MainId:92954. https://doi.org/10.2172/2477920

    2024 doi

  20. [24]

    IncidentResponseGPT: Generating Traffic Incident Response Plans with Generative Artificial Intellige nce

    Grigorev, Artur, et al. IncidentResponseGPT: Generating Traffic Incident Response Plans with Generative Artificial Intellige nce. arXiv, 2024. DOI.org (Datacite), https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2404.18550

    2024 doi arXiv

  21. [26]

    UrbanLLM: Autonomous Urban Activity Planning and Management with Large Language Models

    Jiang, Yue, et al. “UrbanLLM: Autonomous Urban Activity Planning and Management with Large Language Models.” Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024, edited b y Yaser Al- Onaizan et al., Association for Computational Lingu istics, 2024, pp. 1810–2...

    2024 doi

  22. [27]

    Applications and Challenges of Large Language Models in Smart Government -From Technological Advances to Re gulated Applications

    Dai, Ziqing. “Applications and Challenges of Large Language Models in Smart Government -From Technological Advances to Re gulated Applications.” Proceedings of the 2024 3rd Internat ional Conference on Frontiers of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Le arning, ACM, 2024, pp. ...

    2024

  23. [28]

    DynamicRouteGPT: A Real-Time Mul ti-Vehicle Dynamic Navigation Framework Based on Large Languag e Models

    Zhou, Ziai, et al. DynamicRouteGPT: A Real-Time Mul ti-Vehicle Dynamic Navigation Framework Based on Large Languag e Models. arXiv, 2024., https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2408.14185

    2024 doi arXiv

  24. [29]

    Goecks et. al.. DisasterResponseGPT: Large Language Models for Accelerated Plan of Action Development in Disaster Response Scenarios. arXiv, 2023, https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2306.17271

    2023 doi arXiv

  25. [30]

    A Generative AI-Driven Architecture for Intelligent Transportation Systems

    Mangione, Fabrizio, et al. “A Generative AI-Driven Architecture for Intelligent Transportation Systems.” 2024 IEEE 10th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–6. D OI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1109/WF-IoT62078.2024.10811280

    2024

  26. [32]

    Urban AI: Understanding the E merging Role of Artificial Intelligence in Smart Cities

    Luusua, Aale, et al. “Urban AI: Understanding the E merging Role of Artificial Intelligence in Smart Cities.” AI & SOCI ETY, vol. 38, no. 3, June 2023, pp. 1039–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01537-5

    2023 doi

  27. [33]

    Generative AI Assistant for Pub lic Transport Using Scheduled and Real-Time Data

    Axel Nielsen et al. Generative AI Assistant for Pub lic Transport Using Scheduled and Real-Time Data. Linköping University, LiU-ITN-TEK- A–24/016—SE

  28. [34]

    Towards Generative Modeling o f Urban Flow through Knowledge-Enhanced Denoising Diffusion

    Zhou, Zhilun, et al. “Towards Generative Modeling o f Urban Flow through Knowledge-Enhanced Denoising Diffusion.” Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Advances in Ge ographic Information Systems, ACM, 2023, pp. 1–12. DOI.org ( Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1...

    2023

  29. [35]

    Leveraging Digital Twins and Generative AI for Effective Urban Mobility Management

    Canzaniello, Marzia, et al. “Leveraging Digital Twins and Generative AI for Effective Urban Mobility Management.” 2024 IEEE Cyber Science and Technology Congress (CyberSciTech) , IEEE, 2024, pp. 146–53, https://doi.org/10.1109/CyberSciTech64112.2024.00032

    2024

  30. [36]

    Enhancing Government Service Delivery: A Case Study of ACQAR Implementation and Lessons Le arned from ChatGPT Integration in a Singapore Government Agency

    Lee Hui Shan, Alvina, et al. “Enhancing Government Service Delivery: A Case Study of ACQAR Implementation and Lessons Le arned from ChatGPT Integration in a Singapore Government Agency.” Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference on Digi tal Government Research, A...

    2024

  31. [37]

    People-Powered Gen AI: Coll aborating with Generative AI for Civic Engagement

    Williams, Sarah, et al. People-Powered Gen AI: Coll aborating with Generative AI for Civic Engagement. 3 Sept. 2024. D OI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.21428/e4baedd9.f78710e6

    2024 doi

  32. [38]

    The Findings of Our First Generative AI Experiment: GOV.UK Chat – Inside GOV.UK. 18 Jan. 2024, https://insidegovuk.blog.gov.uk/2024/01/18/the-findings-of-our-first- generative-ai-experiment-gov-uk-chat/

    2024

  33. [39]

    VayuBuddy: An LLM-Powered Ch atbot to Democratize Air Quality Insights

    Patel, Zeel B., et al. VayuBuddy: An LLM-Powered Ch atbot to Democratize Air Quality Insights. arXiv, 2024. DOI. org (Datacite), https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2411.12760

    2024 doi arXiv

  34. [40]

    Xu, Haowen, et al. "GenAI-powered multi-agent parad igm for smart urban mobility: Opportunities and challenges for in tegrating large language models (LLMs) and retrieval-augmented gene ration (RAG) with intelligent transportation systems." arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.00494 (202...

    2024 doi arXiv

  35. [41]

    Accelerating Digital Twin D evelopment With Generative AI: A Framework for 3D Modeling and Data Integration

    Gebreab, Senay, et al. “Accelerating Digital Twin D evelopment With Generative AI: A Framework for 3D Modeling and Data Integration.” IEEE Access, vol. 12, 2024, pp. 185918–36. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3514175

    2024

  36. [42]

    Smart Water Management wi th Digital Twins and Multimodal Transformers: A Predictive Approach to Usage and Leakage Detection

    Syed, Toqeer Ali, et al. “Smart Water Management wi th Digital Twins and Multimodal Transformers: A Predictive Approach to Usage and Leakage Detection.” Water, vol. 16, no. 23, Nov. 2024, p. 3410. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.3390/w16233410

    2024 doi

  37. [44]

    Comparative Analysis of Air Quality Index Using Large Language Models and Machine Learning

    Sundaramurthy, Shanmugam, et al. “Comparative Analysis of Air Quality Index Using Large Language Models and Machine Learning.” Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering, edited by Chi-Hua Chen et al., IOS Press, 2024. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.3233/ATDE240822

    2024 doi

  38. [46]

    Automated Smart City Pl anning through Personalized Large Language Model with Retrieval Au gmented Generation

    Alamsyah, Nurwahyu, et al. “Automated Smart City Pl anning through Personalized Large Language Model with Retrieval Au gmented Generation.” 2024 International Conference on Information Technology and Computing (ICITCOM), IEEE, 2024, pp. 306–11. DO I.org (Crossref), https://doi...

    2024

  39. [47]

    A HEART for the Environment: Transformer- Based Spatiotemporal Modeling for Air Quality Prediction

    Bodendorfer, Norbert. A HEART for the Environment: Transformer- Based Spatiotemporal Modeling for Air Quality Prediction. arXiv, 2025. DOI.org (Datacite), https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2502.19042

    2025 doi arXiv

  40. [48]

    Instructor-Worker Large Language Model System for Policy Recommendation: A Case Study on Air Quality Analysis of the January 2025 Los Angeles Wildfires

    Gao, Kyle, et al. Instructor-Worker Large Language Model System for Policy Recommendation: A Case Study on Air Quality Analysis of the January 2025 Los Angeles Wildfires. arXiv, 2025. DO I.org (Datacite), https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2503.00566

    2025 doi

  41. [49]

    A Retrieval-Augmented Genera tion Approach for Data-Driven Energy Infrastructure Digital Twins

    Ieva, Saverio, et al. “A Retrieval-Augmented Genera tion Approach for Data-Driven Energy Infrastructure Digital Twins.” S mart Cities, vol. 7, no. 6, Oct. 2024, pp. 3095–120. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7060121

    2024 doi

  42. [50]

    Crash Data Augmentation Usi ng Variational Autoencoder

    Islam, Zubayer, et al. “Crash Data Augmentation Usi ng Variational Autoencoder.” Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 151, Mar. 2021, p. 105950. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105950

    2021

  43. [52]

    Large Language Models as Urban Residents: An LLM Agent Framework for Personal Mobility Generation

    WWang, Jiawei, et al. “Large Language Models as Urban Residents: An LLM Agent Framework for Personal Mobility Generation.” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, edited by A. Globerson et al., vol. 37, Curran Associates, Inc., 2024, pp. 124547– 74, https://proceedi...

    2024

  44. [53]

    A Few Thoughts on the Use of ChatGPT, GPT 3.5, GPT- 4 and LLMs in Parliaments: Reflecting on the Result s of Experimenting with LLMs in the Parliamentarian Context

    Lucke et. al. . “A Few Thoughts on the Use of ChatGPT, GPT 3.5, GPT- 4 and LLMs in Parliaments: Reflecting on the Result s of Experimenting with LLMs in the Parliamentarian Context.” Digital Government: Research and Practice, May 2024, p. 3665333. DOI.or g (Crossref), https://...

    2024 doi

  45. [54]

    NYC’s Government Chatbot Is Lying ab out City Laws and Regulations

    Orland, Kyle. “NYC’s Government Chatbot Is Lying ab out City Laws and Regulations.” Ars Technica, 29 Mar. 2024, https://arstechnica.com/ai/2024/03/nycs-government-chatbot-is-lying- about-city-laws-and-regulations/

    2024

  46. [55]

    A Methodology for Urban Planning Generation: A Novel Approach Based on Generative De sign

    Pérez-Martínez, Ignacio, et al. “A Methodology for Urban Planning Generation: A Novel Approach Based on Generative De sign.” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 124, Sept. 2023, p. 106609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106609

    2023

  47. [56]

    AI and Generative AI Transforming Disaster Management: A Survey of Damage Assessment and Respo nse Techniques

    Raj, Aman, et al. AI and Generative AI Transforming Disaster Management: A Survey of Damage Assessment and Respo nse Techniques. arXiv:2505.08202, arXiv, 13 May 2025. a rXiv.org, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.08202

    2025 doi arXiv

  48. [57]

    PlanGPT: Enhancing Urban Planning w ith Tailored Language Model and Efficient Retrieval

    Zhu, He, et al. PlanGPT: Enhancing Urban Planning w ith Tailored Language Model and Efficient Retrieval. arXiv, 2024 . DOI.org (Datacite), https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2402.19273

    2024 doi arXiv

  49. [58]

    Crisis Management in the Era of the IoT, Edge Computing, and LLMs

    Ignjatović, Dražen, et al. “Crisis Management in the Era of the IoT, Edge Computing, and LLMs.” 2024 11th International Conference on Internet of Things: Systems, Management and Security (IOTSMS ), IEEE, 2024, pp. 224–31. https://doi.org/10.1109/IOTSMS62296.2024.10710254

    2024

  50. [60]

    Smart City Synergy: Engaging in collaborative practice

    Eriksson Lidén, Emil. "Smart City Synergy: Engaging in collaborative practice." (2024). URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-68496

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.