Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Structured ionized winds shooting out from a quasar at relativistic speeds

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The quasar PDS 456's wind is a clumpy outflow of up to a million clumps moving at 20-33% of the speed of light, with kinetic power above the Eddington limit.

desk verdict Resolved five-component UFO spectrum is real and important, but the paper's mass and kinetic power rates are off by ~1000; the super-Eddington conclusion collapses. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.09171 v1 pith:AHCCVNAV submitted 2025-05-14 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA

XRISM collaboration This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.GA
keywords activegalacticnucleiultra-fastoutflowsquasarwindsX-rayspectroscopyPDS456blackholefeedbackclumpyXRISMResolve
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first high-resolution X-ray observation of the luminous quasar PDS 456 with the Resolve spectrometer on XRISM, which splits what earlier instruments saw as a single broad absorption trough into five discrete velocity components. The authors argue that those five components are five clumps along our line of sight inside a wind containing up to roughly a million clumps, each a few to about sixteen gravitational radii across and located two hundred to six hundred gravitational radii from the black hole. If that picture is right, the wind removes about 60–170 solar masses per year and carries kinetic power above $10^{47}$ erg s$^{-1}$, more than the Eddington luminosity of this black hole. That gives the outflow the energy budget to affect its host galaxy and, the authors argue, disfavors simple energy- and momentum-driven models of galaxy-scale feedback.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing instrument is Resolve, a microcalorimeter (a device that measures the energy of each incoming X-ray photon) with roughly 5 eV resolution at 7 keV, which turns the formerly smooth Fe K trough into a resolved set of lines. The load-bearing geometric identity is the multiplicity relation $f_{\rm vol}=4M(d_{\rm clump}/2)/R$, with $M=5$ clumps along the line of sight, giving a volume filling factor of about 0.1–0.3 and a total clump number $N\sim10^5$–$10^6$. Distances come from light-crossing arguments: the $\sim40$ ks flare doubling time sets the corona, and hence the clump size, at about $16\,R_g$, while the absence of spectral response to a factor-of-four flux change sets $R\gtrsim200\,R_g$; the photoionization relations $n=L_{\rm ion}/(\xi R^2)$ and $N_{\rm H}=n\,d_{\rm clump}$ then give $R\sim460\,R_g\,(d_{\rm clump}/10\,R_g)^{1/2}$. The energetic claims follow from $\dot{M}_w=4\pi f_{\rm cov}f_{\rm vol}nR^2\mu m_p v_{\rm out}$ and $L_{\rm kin}=0.5\,\dot{M}_w v^2$.

What would settle it

Re-observe PDS 456 with the same high-resolution spectrometer after several months, at similar exposure and flux. If the five absorption components appear at the same velocities and depths, the discrete-clump picture would be weakened, since clumps moving at $0.28c$ from $200$–$600\,R_g$ should rearrange on timescales of weeks to months; if the pattern changes, the clump interpretation is supported. A second check is to catch a high-cadence variation of any single absorption component on a timescale consistent with a clump of $2$–$16\,R_g$ crossing the line of sight.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the ultra-fast outflow in PDS 456 is not a smooth single-velocity wind but a structured collection of dense clumps. The Resolve spectrum in the quasar rest frame shows five separate iron K-shell absorption troughs between 8.4 and 9.4 keV, with outflow velocities $v=0.226c$ to $0.333c$, observed column densities between $4.5\times10^{22}$ and $7.6\times10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$, and each component required at better than 99.99% confidence. Because the absorption features and the broad iron K emission did not respond to a factor-of-four flare in the X-ray continuum during the six-day observation, the absorbing gas must lie at $R\gtrsim200\,R_g$; because an absorber must be comparable in size to the flaring X-ray corona, whose roughly 40 ks doubling time implies a scale of about $16\,R_g$, the clumps are $2$–$16\,R_g$ across at $200$–$600\,R_g$. Taking the five detected components as five clumps along the line of sight gives a volume filling factor $f_{\rm vol}\sim0.1$–$0.3$, a total clump population of roughly $10^5$–$10^6$, a mass outflow rate $\dot{M}_w\sim60$–$170\,M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$, and a kinetic power $L_{\rm kin}=0.5\,\dot{M}_w v^2>10^{47}$ erg s$^{-1}$, which exceeds the Eddington luminosity. The same wind, modeled as a wide-angle shell outflowing at $0.2c$–$0.3c$, reproduces the broad iron K emission and its P-Cygni-like shape (emission on the red side, absorption on the blue side) with a covering fraction consistent with full coverage, and the inferred clump sizes match radiation-driven clumpy wind models; relative to galaxy-scale outflows, the wind's kinetic power is more than a thousand times larger and its momentum flux about ten times larger, which the authors say disfavors simple energy- and momentum-driven outflow models.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the five discrete absorption troughs are five separate clumps along the line of sight rather than structure within a smooth or turbulent continuous wind, because the inferred clump number, volume filling factor, mass outflow rate, and kinetic power all scale with that geometric interpretation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The wind kinetic power above $10^{47}$ erg s$^{-1}$ exceeds the Eddington luminosity of about $6\times10^{46}$ erg s$^{-1}$ and rivals the bolometric luminosity, so the nuclear wind alone has enough energy to influence galaxy-scale gas.
  • With $L_{\rm kin}/L_{\rm bol}$ near unity, the wind sits orders of magnitude above the $\sim0.005$ feedback-efficiency threshold thought to be sufficient for black-hole/galaxy co-evolution, making PDS 456 a direct example of feedback in action.
  • The revised mass outflow rate of 60–170 solar masses per year is an order of magnitude larger than the previous homogeneous-wind estimate and is comparable to the kiloparsec-scale molecular outflow, so the nuclear wind can plausibly supply the large-scale outflow.
  • The large mismatch between the nuclear wind and the galaxy-scale outflow—kinetic power more than a thousand times larger, momentum flux about ten times larger—disfavors simple energy- and momentum-driven outflow models and implies either a short active phase or inefficient coupling due to clumpiness.
  • The inferred clump sizes of 2–16 gravitational radii at 200–600 gravitational radii match the predictions of radiation-pressure-driven clumpy wind simulations, supporting the clump interpretation and tying the observation to theoretical wind-launching models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the clump interpretation is correct, other luminous quasars whose ultra-fast outflows appear as single broad troughs at CCD resolution probably hide similar multi-component structure; re-observing a small sample with calorimeter-class resolution would test whether PDS 456 is a template or an outlier.
  • The discreteness of the five components should be testable by re-observing PDS 456 after several months: at $0.28c$ and radii of $200$–$600\,R_g$, individual clumps should rearrange on timescales of weeks to months, so a stable five-trough pattern would favor a persistent stratified wind over discrete clumps, while a rearranged pattern would confirm the clump picture.
  • The marginal $\sim0.4c$ absorber hinted at in the residuals suggests that even faster components may appear with longer exposures; if such components are common, population-level kinetic-power estimates for ultra-fast outflows could be systematically low.
  • The geometric link between line-of-sight multiplicity and volume filling factor implies that variability monitoring could statistically count clumps, connecting single-object results like this one to the covering factors used in larger AGN feedback samples.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper reports the first XRISM Resolve observation of the luminous quasar PDS 456, obtained in a simultaneous X-ray/UV campaign. The high-resolution Fe K spectrum reveals five discrete absorption components with outflow velocities v = 0.226c–0.333c, observed column densities NH,obs ≈ (4.5–7.6)×10^22 cm^-2, a tied ionization parameter log ξ ≈ 4.9, and turbulent broadening ≈1900 km/s; the detection is cross-checked with three photoionization codes (XSTAR, XABS, PHASE). Interpreting the five components as clumps along the line of sight, the authors infer clump sizes 2–16 Rg at radii 200–600 Rg, a volume filling factor 0.1–0.3, a total clump population of up to ~10^6, a mass outflow rate of 60–170 Msun/yr, and a kinetic power Lkin ≈ 10^47 erg/s, exceeding the Eddington luminosity. They conclude that the wind can significantly impact the host galaxy and that simple energy- and momentum-driven outflow models are disfavored.

Significance. The observation is a significant technical achievement: it resolves an ultrafast AGN outflow into multiple discrete velocity components for the first time, using a careful blind line search, AIC-based significance estimates, simultaneous broadband data, and three independent spectral models. If the clumpy-wind interpretation is correct, the inferred mass and energy outflow rates place PDS 456 at the extreme end of AGN feedback and provide strong constraints on wind launching and structure. I also checked the arithmetic objection raised in the stress-test note: the claimed factor-1000 discrepancy in the mass outflow rate is a unit error, since mp = 1.67×10^-24 g is the correct cgs value; using it in Mdot = 4π fcov fvol (Lion/ξ) μmp v reproduces the quoted 60–170 Msun/yr for fvol = 0.1–0.3. The main caveats are the geometric assumptions underlying the clump interpretation and the partly self-referential emission-line modeling, both of which affect the derived energetics and should be addressed.

major comments (3)
  1. [Main text: 'The high-resolution spectra... multiplicity M' paragraph] The paper equates the five detected absorption velocity zones with M = 5 clumps along the line of sight and uses this in fvol = 4M(dclump/2)/R. This is a geometric assumption rather than a direct observable: a smooth or turbulent velocity-stratified outflow, or a single structured clump with internal velocity and ionization gradients, can also produce multiple discrete absorption troughs. Since M enters linearly in fvol and hence in Mdot and Lkin, the systematic uncertainty should be quantified explicitly. For example, if the five components are instead substructure of a single clump (M = 1), fvol drops by a factor of five and Lkin becomes roughly (2.7–7.6)×10^46 erg/s for the quoted dclump and R ranges, making the claim that the wind exceeds Eddington marginal. Conversely, a smooth shell (fvol = 1) would increase Mdot, so the conclusion is not conservative in that direction. The authors should either justify M = 5 with independent constraints or present Lkin as a range including this geometric uncertainty.
  2. [Methods: 'Emission line profile'; main text: 'To self-consistently model...'] The emission-line profile used to fit the broad Fe K feature is constructed from an assumed hemispherical shell with velocities 0.2c–0.3c, inclination i = 15°, and special-relativistic beaming—the same velocity range inferred from the absorption components. The good fit of this model and the derived covering factor fcov = 1.9 ± 0.7 therefore do not independently confirm the wind origin of the broad emission; this is a circular step. The independent support for full covering comes from the line-of-sight absorber covering fraction f = 0.91 ± 0.01 obtained in the absorption fit. The authors should acknowledge this circularity and cite the absorption-derived covering fraction when fcov ≈ 1 is adopted in the mass-rate formula, rather than presenting the emission normalization as a separate validation.
  3. [Main text: 'The mass outflow rate is...' paragraph] The statement that 'even for the most conservative value of Mdot, Lkin ≈ 10^47 erg/s' is not accompanied by a propagation of the quoted uncertainties in NH, ξ, Lion, v, and fvol. Using the allowed ranges (NH = 0.8–1.4×10^23 cm^-2 per clump, log ξ = 4.9 ± 0.14, Lion = 1.6 ± 0.5×10^46 erg/s, v/c = 0.28 ± 0.02) shifts fvol toward the lower end near 0.1, giving Mdot ≈ 60 Msun/yr and Lkin ≈ (1.1–1.4)×10^47 erg/s. The conclusion may still hold, but the derivation should show the explicit lower bound from the parameter ranges rather than a single fiducial value, so that the 'conservative' claim is verifiable.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract vs. main text] The abstract quotes a mass outflow rate of 60–300 Msun/yr, while the main text and Methods quote 60–170 Msun/yr; these numbers should be reconciled.
  2. [Table 2 and main text significance statement] In Table 2, the Resolve-only null probabilities for zones 4 and 5 are 2.7×10^-3 and 2.1×10^-2, respectively, so the statement in the main text that 'each [zone is] required at more than 99.99% confidence according to the Akaike Information Criteria' is only true for the full dataset (Resolve+Xtend+NuSTAR). This distinction should be stated explicitly.
  3. [Methods, Eq. (2)] The third branch condition in Eq. (2), 'cot i < tanθ, tanθ < −cot i', is self-contradictory for positive cot i; please check and correct the inequalities defining the azimuthal window w_phi.
  4. [Acknowledgments] The acknowledgments contain a garbled passage: 'and JP2 Exam-ples of the convolved emission line p3K03459' appears to be a corrupted or misplaced fragment and should be corrected.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

One self-referential emission-line validation; the five-component absorption detection and wind energetics derivation are not circular.

  1. self definitional [Main text, paragraph beginning 'To self-consistently model the emission spectrum...'; Methods, 'Emission line profile']
    "We assumed an inclination angle of i = 15◦ based on a recent estimation by the GRAVITY collaboration27, and velocities ranging from 0.2c to 0.3c to approximately match those of the absorption lines."

    The broad Fe-K emission model is built from the absorption result: its velocity support (0.2c–0.3c) is explicitly chosen to match the absorption lines, and the Methods state that 'the ionization parameters and column densities were tied to the absorption model in the spectral fitting, the only free parameter of this convolved emission model is normalization.' The paper then uses the good emission fit to claim 'the validity of the interpretation that the emission originates from the wind.' Since the emission model's velocity range and plasma parameters are inputs copied from the absorption analysis, the emission fit cannot independently validate the 0.2c–0.3c wind velocity or the wind-origin interpretation; it is a consistency check of a model constructed from those same values.

full rationale

The core chain—detection of five discrete absorption zones in the XRISM Resolve spectrum, their column densities, velocities, and ionization parameters—is grounded directly in the data and cross-checked with independent photoionization codes (XSTAR, XABS, and PHASE), so no fitted parameter is being renamed as a prediction. The clump-size and radius estimates use variability and light-crossing arguments plus the relation nR2 = Lion/ξ, none of which reduce by construction to the claimed mass outflow rate or kinetic power. The only step approaching circularity is the emission-line validation: the velocity profile used to model the broad Fe-K emission was chosen to match the absorption velocities, so the good emission fit is partly self-consistent by construction rather than an independent confirmation. That step is not load-bearing for the central absorption result. The possible arithmetic inconsistency in the Mdot evaluation raised in the skeptic brief is a numerical correctness issue, not a circularity, and does not affect this score.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The five-zone detection is direct, but all derived quantities (clump size, number, Mdot, Lkin) depend on the fitted xi, Lion, velocities, and the geometric clump model.

free parameters (6)
  • Ionization parameter log xi = 4.90 +/- 0.14 (tied); 4.96 +/- 0.35 (free); fiducial 5.0
    Fitted to the Fe K spectrum; sets nR^2 = Lion/xi which feeds all wind energetics.
  • Turbulent velocity Delta v = 1900 +600/-400 km/s; PHASE 1489-2889 km/s
    Fitted line broadening tied across zones; affects absorber optical depths.
  • Column density per zone NH = NH,obs = (4.5-7.6)e22 cm^-2; NH,corr ~ 1e23 cm^-2
    Fitted per zone; enters clump size relation R^2 = Lion dclump/(NH xi).
  • Outflow velocity v = 0.226c-0.333c; mean 0.280c +/- 0.021c
    Fitted from line centroids; enters Mdot, Lkin, and the de-boosting factor Phi = 0.32.
  • Covering fraction fcov = 1.9 +/- 0.7 (fitted); adopted 1 for Mdot
    Fitted from emission normalization; multiplies Mdot, but set to unity conservatively.
  • De-boosted ionizing luminosity Lion = (1.6 +/- 0.5)e46 erg/s
    Derived from SED fit and de-boosting; defines nR^2 used throughout.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption XSTAR/XABS/PHASE photoionization models with the adopted SED accurately describe the Fe K absorption and emission.
    All column densities, xi, and velocities are derived from these models; systematic errors in atomic data or SED would propagate into the derived parameters.
  • domain assumption The five absorption zones share a common ionization parameter and turbulent velocity in the baseline model.
    Parameters are tied to simplify the fit; freeing xi gives a consistent mean but per-zone values differ in PHASE.
  • ad hoc to paper The wind emission comes from a hemispherical shell at 0.2-0.3c with inclination i = 15 degrees, with the disk blocking the receding hemisphere.
    The emission line profile is computed for this geometry; the velocity range is inherited from the absorption measurement and the inclination from GRAVITY.
  • ad hoc to paper Each discrete absorption component is a clump of size comparable to the corona (2-16 Rg), with M = 5 clumps along the line of sight.
    This geometric model converts line counts into fvol = 4M(dclump/2)/R and clump number N; a smooth flow would change the results.
  • domain assumption Relativistic de-boosting of the ionizing luminosity follows Luminari et al. (2020), Phi = 0.32 at v/c = -0.28.
    The de-boosted Lion used for xi and energetics depends on this correction.
  • domain assumption The black hole mass MBH = 5e8 Msun and efficiency eta = 0.05 used for Eddington comparisons are correct.
    They set LEdd and Macc used to frame the energetics; MBH is from GRAVITY, eta is standard.
invented entities (1)
  • Dense clumps in the ultra-fast wind (N ~ 1e5-1e6)
    purpose: To explain the five discrete absorption components and produce the volume filling factor that raises Mdot and Lkin above homogeneous estimates.
    The clump size and count are inferred from the resolved lines plus geometric assumptions; no independent falsifiable prediction is provided outside this source.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Structured ionized winds shooting out from a quasar at relativistic speeds." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AHCCVNAV

@misc{pith2026250509171,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Structured ionized winds shooting out from a quasar at relativistic speeds},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AHCCVNAV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.09171}
}
read the original abstract

Evidence indicates that supermassive black holes exist at the centers of most galaxies. Their mass correlates with the galactic bulge mass, suggesting a co-evolution with their host galaxies, most likely through powerful winds. X-ray observations have detected highly ionized winds outflowing at sub-relativistic speeds from the accretion disks around supermassive black holes. However, the limited spectral resolution of current X-ray instruments has left the physical structure and location of the winds poorly understood, hindering accurate estimates of their kinetic power. Here, the first XRISM observation of the luminous quasar, PDS 456, is reported. The high-resolution spectrometer Resolve onboard XRISM enabled the discovery of five discrete velocity components outflowing at 20-30% of the speed of light. This demonstrates that the wind structure is highly inhomogeneous, which likely consists of up to a million clumps. The mass outflow rate is estimated to be 60-300 solar masses per year, with the wind kinetic power exceeding the Eddington luminosity limit. Compared to the galaxy-scale outflows, the kinetic power is more than 3 orders of magnitude larger, while the momentum flux is 10 times larger. These estimates disfavor both energy- and momentum-driven outflow models. It suggests that such wind activity occurs in less than 10% of the quasar phase and/or that its energy/momentum is not efficiently transferred to the galaxy-scale outflows due to the clumpiness of the wind and the interstellar medium.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fe K$\alpha$ line from the Broad Line Region of PDS456 with XRISM/Resolve

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    XRISM/Resolve reveals a narrow, blueshifted neutral Fe Kα line (EW ≈ 9 eV, v_out ≈ 2700 km/s) in quasar PDS 456, likely from the outer Broad Line Region at the high-luminosity end of the X-ray Baldwin effect.

  2. First detection of ultra-fast outflows in a quiescent galaxy

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    First detection of an ultra-fast outflow (v≈0.07c) in a quiescent galaxy quenched ~9 Gyr ago, suggesting AGN winds can maintain quiescence independent of global star formation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [15]

    004 002.15Oct2023 Build7.011

    Similarly, NICER also monitored from March 10 to 16 with approx- imately daily sampling. This monitoring campaign provides X-ray vari- ability with a timescale longer than the XRISM observation. In addition to X-ray telescopes, simultaneous optical spectroscopic observations were also performed with the 3.8 m Seimei telescope located in Okayama prefec- tu...

    work page

  2. [27]

    The size-luminosity relation of local active galactic nuclei from interferometric observations of the broad- line region

    GRAVITY Collaboration et al. The size-luminosity relation of local active galactic nuclei from interferometric observations of the broad- line region. Astron. & Astrophys. 684, A167 (2024). 2401.07676

    arXiv 2024

  3. [28]

    Zak, M. K. et al. Fierce Feedback in an Obscured, Sub-Eddington State of the Seyfert 1.2 Markarian 817. Astrophys. J. Lett. 962, L1 (2024). 2312.06487

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  4. [29]

    Fukumura, K. et al. Magnetically Driven Accretion Disk Winds and Ultra-fast Outflows in PG 1211+143. Astrophys. J. 805, 17 (2015). 1503.04074

    arXiv 2015

  5. [30]

    Hopkins, P . F . & Elvis, M. Quasar feedback: more bang for your buck. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 401, 7–14 (2010). 0904.0649

    arXiv 2010

  6. [31]

    Bruni, G. et al. The WISSH quasars project. VI. Fraction and prop- erties of BAL quasars in the hyper-luminosity regime. Astron. & Astrophys. 630, A111 (2019). 1908.09673

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  7. [32]

    Laha, S., Guainazzi, M., Chakravorty, S., Dewangan, G. C. & Kem- bhavi, A. K. Warm absorbers in X-rays (WAX), a comprehensive high-resolution grating spectral study of a sample of Seyfert Galax- ies - II. Warm absorber dynamics and feedback to galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 457, 3896–3911 (2016). 1601.06369

    arXiv 2016

  8. [33]

    Lutz, D. et al. Molecular outflows in local galaxies: Method compari- son and a role of intermittent AGN driving.Astron. & Astrophys.633, A134 (2020). 1911.05608

    arXiv 2020

Show all 43 references
  1. [34]

    Harrison, F . A. et al. The Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Ar- ray (NuSTAR) High-energy X-Ray Mission. Astrophys. J. 770, 103 (2013). 1301.7307

    2013 arXiv

  2. [35]

    Jansen, F . et al. XMM-Newton observatory. I. The spacecraft and operations. Astron. & Astrophys. 365, L1–L6 (2001)

    2001

  3. [36]

    den Herder, J. W. et al. The Reflection Grating Spectrometer on board XMM-Newton. Astron. & Astrophys. 365, L7–L17 (2001)

    2001

  4. [37]

    Str ¨uder, L. et al. The European Photon Imaging Camera on XMM- Newton: The pn-CCD camera. Astron. & Astrophys. 365, L18–L26 (2001)

    2001

  5. [38]

    Turner, M. J. L. et al. The European Photon Imaging Camera on XMM-Newton: The MOS cameras. Astron. & Astrophys. 365, L27– L35 (2001). astro-ph/0011498

    2001 arXiv

  6. [39]

    Mason, K. O. et al. The XMM-Newton optical/UV monitor telescope. Astron. & Astrophys. 365, L36–L44 (2001). astro-ph/0011216

    2001 arXiv

  7. [40]

    Gehrels, N. et al. The Swift Gamma-Ray Burst Mission. Astrophys. J. 611, 1005–1020 (2004). astro-ph/0405233

    2004 arXiv

  8. [41]

    Gendreau, K. C. et al. The Neutron star Interior Composition Ex- plorer (NICER): design and development. In Proc. SPIE, vol. 9905, 99051H (2016)

    2016

  9. [42]

    Burrows, D. N. et al. The Swift X-Ray Telescope. Space Sci. Rev. 120, 165–195 (2005). astro-ph/0508071

    2005 arXiv

  10. [43]

    Reeves, J. N. et al. The flaring X-ray corona in the quasar PDS 456. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 500, 1974–1991 (2021). 2010.14295

    2021 arXiv

  11. [44]

    Kurita, M. et al. The Seimei telescope project and technical devel- opments. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn 72, 48 (2020)

    2020

  12. [45]

    Matsubayashi, K. et al. KOOLS-IFU: Kyoto Okayama Optical Low- dispersion Spectrograph with optical-fiber Integral Field Unit. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn 71, 102 (2019). 1905.05430

    2019 arXiv

  13. [46]

    Midooka, T. et al. X-ray transmission calibration of the gate valve for the x-ray astronomy satellite XRISM. Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems 7, 028005 (2021)

    2021

  14. [47]

    Kilbourne, C. A. et al. In-flight calibration of Hitomi Soft X-ray Spec- trometer. (1) Background. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn 70, 18 (2018)

    2018

  15. [48]

    Mochizuki, Y . et al. Optimization of x-ray event screening using ground and in-orbit data for the Resolve instrument onboard the XRISM satellite. In den Herder, J.-W. A., Nikzad, S. & Nakazawa, K. (eds.) Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, vol...

    2024

  16. [49]

    & F¨orster, E

    H ¨olzer, G., Fritsch, M., Deutsch, M., H¨artwig, J. & F¨orster, E. Kα1,2 and Kβ1,3 x-ray emission lines of the 3d transition metals. Phys. Rev. A 56, 4554–4568 (1997)

    1997

  17. [50]

    Porter, F . S. et al. Temporal Gain Correction for X-ray Calorimeter Spectrometers. Journal of Low Temperature Physics 184, 498–504 (2016)

    2016

  18. [51]

    Porter, F . S. et al. In-flight performance of the XRISM/Resolve de- tector system. In den Herder, J.-W. A., Nikzad, S. & Nakazawa, K. (eds.) Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, vol. 13093, 130931K. International Society for Optics and Photonic...

    2024

  19. [52]

    Eckart, M. E. et al. Energy gain scale calibration of the XRISM Resolve microcalorimeter spectrometer: ground calibration results and on orbit comparison. In den Herder, J.-W. A., Nikzad, S. & Nakazawa, K. (eds.) Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Ultraviolet to Gamma ...

    2024

  20. [53]

    Forster, K. et al. NuSTAR observatory science operations: on-orbit acclimation. In Peck, A. B., Benn, C. R. & Seaman, R. L. (eds.) Ob- servatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems V , vol. 9149 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference...

    2014

  21. [54]

    Gabriel, C. et al. The XMM-Newton SAS - Distributed Development and Maintenance of a Large Science Analysis System: A Critical Analysis. In Ochsenbein, F ., Allen, M. G. & Egret, D. (eds.) As- tronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems (ADASS) XIII , vol. 314 of Astronomica...

    2004

  22. [55]

    Roming, P . W. A. et al. The Swift Ultra-Violet/Optical Telescope. Space Sci. Rev. 120, 95–142 (2005). astro-ph/0507413

    2005 arXiv

  23. [56]

    & McCray, R

    Wilms, J., Allen, A. & McCray, R. On the Absorption of X-Rays in the Interstellar Medium. Astrophys. J. 542, 914–924 (2000). astro-ph/0008425

    2000 arXiv

  24. [57]

    R., Palmeri, P ., Bautista, M

    Kallman, T. R., Palmeri, P ., Bautista, M. A., Mendoza, C. & Krolik, J. H. Photoionization Modeling and the K Lines of Iron. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 155, 675–701 (2004). astro-ph/0405210

    2004 arXiv

  25. [58]

    & Ebisawa, K

    Mochizuki, Y ., Mizumoto, M. & Ebisawa, K. Origin of the complex iron line structure and spectral variation in Mrk 766. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 525, 922–932 (2023). 2308.05924

    2023 arXiv

  26. [59]

    Tanimoto, A. et al. XCLUMPY: X-Ray Spectral Model from Clumpy Torus and Its Application to the Circinus Galaxy. Astrophys. J. 877, 95 (2019). 1904.08945

    2019 arXiv

  27. [60]

    Chiang, C.-Y . et al. X-ray lags in PDS 456 revealed by Suzaku observations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 472, 1473–1481 (2017). 1703.08223

    2017 arXiv

  28. [61]

    Parameter estimation in astronomy through application of the likelihood ratio

    Cash, W. Parameter estimation in astronomy through application of the likelihood ratio. Astrophys. J. 228, 939–947 (1979)

    1979

  29. [62]

    Matzeu, G. A. et al. Evidence for a radiatively driven disc-wind in PDS 456? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 472, L15–L19 (2017). 1708. 03546

    2017

  30. [63]

    S., Mewe, R

    Kaastra, J. S., Mewe, R. & Nieuwenhuijzen, H. SPEX: a new code for spectral analysis of X & UV spectra. In Y amashita, K. & Watan- abe, T. (eds.)UV and X-ray Spectroscopy of Astrophysical and Lab- oratory Plasmas, 411–414 (1996)

    1996

  31. [64]

    Parker, M. L. et al. The nuclear environment of the NLS1 Mrk 335: Obscuration of the X-ray line emission by a variable outflow. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 490, 683–697 (2019). 1909.04924

    2019 arXiv

  32. [65]

    Xu, Y . et al. Constraints on the ultrafast outflows in the narrow- line Seyfert 1 galaxy Mrk 1044 from high-resolution time- and flux- resolved spectroscopy. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 523, 2158–2171 (2023). 2305.11966

    2023 arXiv

  33. [66]

    A systematic study of the ultra-fast outflow responses to luminosity variations in active galactic nuclei

    Xu, Y .et al. A systematic study of the ultra-fast outflow responses to luminosity variations in active galactic nuclei. Astron. & Astrophys. 687, A179 (2024). 2405.07494

    2024 arXiv

  34. [67]

    Krongold, Y . et al. Toward a Self-Consistent Model of the Ion- ized Absorber in NGC 3783. Astrophys. J. 597, 832–850 (2003). astro-ph/0306460. 4 Acknowledgments The authors thank Junjie Mao for fruitful discus- sions and comments, and Yuto Mochizuki for his technical advice o...

    2003 arXiv

  35. [68]

    baseline

    Gaussian modeling of the detector’s line spread for the Mn Kα line indi- cates an instrument resolution of4.55±0.05 eV Full-Width Half Maximum (FWHM), with an energy shift of≲ 0.1 eV . Early calibration measurements indicate that the energy scale is accurate to within approxim...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.