Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Beyond the Power Spectrum: A New Framework for Non-Stationary Fields with Applications to Light-Cone Effects in Line Intensity Mapping

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that a new hybrid eigenbasis summary statistic beats the power spectrum for 21 cm light cones, yielding about 30 percent tighter constraints on seven reionization parameters in an interferometer forecast.

desk verdict A clean new eigenbasis summary statistic for light-cone 21cm data; the 30% Fisher gain is real but currently a matched-filter upper bound, not a demonstrated robust improvement. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.09674 v3 pith:Y62JI5VK submitted 2025-05-14 astro-ph.CO

Mattéo Blamart , Adrian Liu This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords 21cmcosmologylightconeeffectnon-stationaryfieldspowerspectrumlineintensitymappingEpochofReionizationeigenbasisFisherforecast
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the power spectrum stops being the right summary statistic once a survey's line of sight spans a large chunk of cosmic history, because the light cone breaks translational invariance and creates correlations between Fourier modes. It introduces a new statistic, $M(k_\perp,i)$, built from an eigen-decomposition of the line-of-sight covariance, completed with Fourier modes to keep the basis numerically stable. In a Fisher forecast for a 320-antenna interferometer observing the 21 cm signal from the Epoch of Reionization, the statistic tightens constraints on seven astrophysical parameters by roughly 30 percent compared with two standard Fourier power-spectrum analyses. If the claim holds, future reionization surveys could extract noticeably more information from the same data at essentially no extra computational cost.

What carries the argument

The object that carries the argument is the line-of-sight covariance matrix, estimated by averaging products of brightness-temperature fluctuations over many lines of sight in a long light-cone volume. Diagonalizing it yields eigenvectors that look like Fourier modes whose amplitudes are modulated with redshift; the first of these resembles the sky-averaged 21 cm signal, and the plotted modes all cross zero near the absorption-to-emission transition. Because only the highest-eigenvalue eigenvectors converge with a finite number of sight lines, the paper uses a hybrid basis: the first 20 eigenvectors plus Fourier modes made exactly orthogonal through Gram-Schmidt. The summary statistic $M(k_\perp,i)$ is then the binned squared expansion coefficient of the field on this hybrid basis, playing the role that $P(k_\perp,k_\parallel)$ plays in the stationary case.

What would settle it

Repeat the Fisher comparison with the hybrid basis recomputed from light-cone realizations whose astrophysical parameters are shifted by more than ten percent from the fiducial values, or from a single noise-dominated realization; if the roughly 30 percent tightening over the Fourier power spectrum shrinks below the sampling uncertainty or reverses, the reported advantage is a matched-filter artifact rather than a robust property.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that for a 21 cm light cone spanning redshifts 5 to 10, the Fourier basis no longer diagonalizes the line-of-sight covariance, and the lost information lives in correlations between different line-of-sight Fourier modes. The paper constructs the basis that does diagonalize that covariance, keeps the first 20 converged eigenvectors, orthogonalizes the remaining Fourier modes against them with Gram-Schmidt, and defines the quadratic statistic $M(k_\perp,i) \equiv (1/N_{\rm LS}V)\sum_{k_\perp}|\alpha_i(k_\perp)|^2$. Forecasts with a 320-antenna interferometer, foreground avoidance, and thermal noise show roughly 30 percent tighter constraints on seven EoR astrophysical parameters than either the full light-cone two-dimensional power spectrum or a sliced light-cone power spectrum, with the gain coming mainly from reduced parameter degeneracies. In the coeval limit without a light cone, the eigen-decomposition returns the ordinary Fourier basis, so the new statistic contains the power spectrum as a special case.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the line-of-sight covariance matrix estimated from ten fiducial simulation realizations produces eigenvectors that are converged and stable enough that the hybrid basis built from the first twenty of them stays near-optimal for slightly different models and for real data.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For a 21 cm light cone spanning $z=5$ to $z=10$, the new summary statistic $M(k_\perp,i)$ yields parameter constraints roughly 30 percent tighter than the full light-cone two-dimensional power spectrum and the slicing approach.
  • The improvement comes primarily from reduced degeneracies between the seven astrophysical parameters, visible as smaller off-diagonal Fisher matrix elements, rather than from larger diagonal sensitivities.
  • In the absence of the light cone, using coeval boxes, the eigen-decomposition recovers the ordinary Fourier basis, so $M(k_\perp,i)$ reduces to the two-dimensional power spectrum $P(k_\perp,k_\parallel)$.
  • The hybrid construction, keeping the first 20 eigenvectors and completing with Gram-Schmidt-orthogonalized Fourier modes, avoids the slow convergence of high-order eigenvectors while staying near-optimal.
  • Because the basis is insensitive to at least a 10 percent change in $f_{\rm esc,10}$, a two-step analysis can use power-spectrum-derived parameter estimates to build the basis and then apply $M(k_\perp,i)$ for improved constraints.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the basis must be estimated from real, noise-dominated data rather than from clean fiducial simulations, the reported 30 percent gain is likely to shrink; the paper's matched-filter forecast uses the true fiducial basis.
  • The same eigen-decomposition logic should transfer to other line-intensity mapping lines, such as CO or [CII], and to Cosmic Dawn or Dark Ages surveys, where the light-cone effect is even more pronounced relative to the comoving volume.
  • Because the first eigenvector resembles the redshift-dependent sky-averaged 21 cm signal, one could try to model the modulating envelope analytically from the global brightness-temperature history, removing the need for simulation-based basis estimation.
  • A natural stress test is to replace the Fisher mean-only forecast with a full likelihood or simulation-based inference that includes the variance term, which the paper itself notes can only add information; the comparison between $M(k_\perp,i)$ and the power spectrum could shift.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a new summary statistic M(k_perp,i) for cosmological fields that are non-stationary along the line of sight. The statistic is based on an eigen-decomposition of the line-of-sight covariance matrix, with the basis taken from 21cmFAST lightcone simulations and completed by Fourier modes in a hybrid construction. The authors compare Fisher-matrix forecasts for seven EoR astrophysical parameters using this statistic against two power-spectrum-based approaches in a HERA-like setting, including thermal noise and a foreground wedge. They report that the new statistic produces approximately 30% tighter constraints than the Fourier approaches, and they discuss the model-dependence of the basis and a possible iterative strategy for practical application.

Significance. If the reported information gain is robust, the paper would provide a useful new data-compression tool for line-intensity mapping surveys that observe large redshift spans, where power-spectrum analyses are known to be suboptimal. The mathematical construction is clear, and the demonstration that the eigenbasis reduces to the Fourier basis in the coeval limit is a helpful validation. The paper is also honest about the model-dependence of the method and proposes a plausible power-spectrum-first workflow for estimating the basis. However, the headline gain is computed in a matched-filter setting, and the robustness test shown does not directly address how the gain degrades under basis mismatch. The credibility of the central claim therefore requires additional quantitative evidence rather than a change in the theoretical framework.

major comments (3)
  1. [Secs. II.B, II.D, III.C, IV] The 30% improvement quoted in Section IV is a matched-filter result. The line-of-sight covariance matrix used to build the basis is computed from fiducial-parameter 21cmFAST lightcones (Section II.B), and the Fisher derivatives dM/dtheta are evaluated by projecting fiducial and perturbed lightcones onto this same fiducial basis (Section III.C). This measures how well a basis tuned to the true model performs, not how well a basis estimated from data or from a slightly misspecified model performs. The robustness test in Section V.A (Figure 8) only shows that the first four eigenvectors are qualitatively similar under a 10% change in f_esc,10; it does not quantify how the Fisher gain changes under basis mismatch. I recommend adding a test in which the Fisher matrix for M is recomputed using a basis constructed from perturbed parameters, from a different realization subset, or from noise-degraded data, and reporting the gain relative to the power spectrum as a function of the model offset.
  2. [Secs. II.C, II.D, IV] The comparison between M(k_perp,i) and P(k_perp,k_parallel) may be unfair because M includes modes that the power spectrum comparison excludes. In the coeval limit, Section II.C states that M is identical to the 2D power spectrum with the index i corresponding to a specific k_z mode; consequently, the i=1 eigenvector corresponds to the k_z=0 constant/global mode, which standard power-spectrum analyses remove. The paper does not specify whether the 'Full Lightcone 2D Power Spectrum' excludes k_parallel=0, nor how the Gram-Schmidt construction affects the low-index modes. If a substantial part of the gain comes from the first one or two eigenmodes, the improvement could reflect the re-inclusion of the monopole or large-scale mean rather than lightcone-induced correlations. Please quantify the Fisher information contributed by each eigenmode and rerun the comparison with i=1 (and, if relevant, i=2) removed, or include k_parallel=0 in the power-spectrum comparison in a controlled way.
  3. [Sec. II.D] The claim that the first 20 eigenvectors have converged is not supported by a quantitative diagnostic. The covariance matrix is computed from 10 realizations of a 250x250x1690 Mpc box, which gives many lines of sight, but no eigenspectrum gap, no split-sample comparison, and no realization-to-realization scatter of the eigenvectors is shown. Because the Fisher gain depends on the fidelity of these modes, I ask for a convergence test, such as a scree plot with error bars from jackknifed realizations or a split-sample comparison of the resulting Fisher matrix. Without such a diagnostic, the retained-mode choice remains an ad hoc element of the central forecast.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. I] The Introduction ends with 'We summarize our conclusions in Section IV', but the conclusions are presented in Section VI; please correct the cross-reference.
  2. [Sec. I] There are several typos: 'the the Hydrogen Epoch of Reionization Array', 'the the Low-Frequency Array', and repeated words around Eq. (12) ('and andu'); please proofread.
  3. [Sec. II.B] In the paragraph describing the powerbox test, 'computationally less expansive' should be 'computationally less expensive'.
  4. [Sec. II.C] The sentence beginning 'with Npixels or Nobserved frequencies along the' is incomplete and should be finished or rewritten.
  5. [Fig. 4] The caption appears inconsistent with the text: it says M2 uses 'unperturbed Fourier modes', while the text says M2 corresponds to the case where modulated amplitude vectors are perturbed; please clarify which basis is modified in each panel.
  6. [Sec. III.B.2] In Eq. (13), the quantities B and t are used but not explicitly defined in the text; please define the bandwidth and integration time before use.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

The 30% improvement is a matched-filter forecast: the hybrid basis is fitted to the fiducial 21cmFAST model and the Fisher gain is evaluated at that same fiducial point, making the headline claim partially circular.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. III.C and Sec. IV (Fisher forecast); model dependence acknowledged in Sec. V.A]
    "The covariance matrices used in the computation of the hybrid basis are based on simulations that are run using the fiducial astrophysical parameters listed in Section III A. ... In all cases, our approach demonstrates superior performance in constraining astrophysical parameters. On average, we observe an improvement of approximately 30 percent across the seven parameters compared to the two Fourier-based methods"

    The hybrid basis is obtained by diagonalizing the line-of-sight covariance of 21cmFAST lightcones run at the fiducial astrophysical parameters. The Fisher forecast then computes ∂M/∂θ by projecting θ_i±ε lightcones onto this same fiducial basis and evaluates the parameter constraints at the fiducial point. The reported 30% improvement is therefore the in-sample, matched-filter performance of a compression basis that is assumed to be known perfectly, whereas in practice the basis must be estimated from data or from an approximate model. The paper's own Sec. V.A concedes this model-dependent nature and proposes a two-step power-spectrum-first strategy, but it does not quantify how the Fisher gain degrades under basis mismatch.

full rationale

The paper's core mathematical construction—line-of-sight covariance eigendecomposition, hybrid basis completion, and the M(k⊥,i) summary statistic—is self-contained and not a renaming of a known result; nor does it rely on load-bearing self-citations or imported uniqueness theorems. The circularity is confined to the central performance claim. The basis is fitted to fiducial-parameter simulations (Sec. II.B, Sec. III.C), and the Fisher forecast that yields 'an improvement of approximately 30 percent' (Sec. IV) is evaluated at the same fiducial model using that exact basis. This makes the improvement a matched-filter/in-sample result rather than a demonstrated robust prediction. The paper explicitly flags the model dependence in Sec. V.A and suggests an iterative power-spectrum-first workflow, but only tests eigenvector stability (Fig. 8), not the stability of the Fisher gain under basis mismatch. That gap means the headline is an upper bound on achievable improvement, and the predictive claim is partially circular because the estimator was fitted to the model against which it is then judged. For that reason the score is 5 rather than 0; however, the underlying basis formalism and the Fisher comparison itself are legitimate and independently meaningful.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on simulations (21cmFAST), the flat-sky/isotropy approximation, the 1D light-cone assumption, and the adequacy of the Fisher approximation. The most paper-specific added assumption is that the top 20 eigenvectors from a 10-realization covariance are converged and model-robust. No invented physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Number of retained eigenvectors in hybrid basis = 20
    Section II.D: 'the basis is then composed of v_i(z) eigenvectors ranging from i=1 to i=20 to ensure that only the eigenvectors that have converged are retained.' No convergence diagnostic is provided; the choice is ad hoc.
  • LOS covariance k_perp summation = all k_perp combined
    Section II.B: 'For simplicity, we leave this possibility to future work.' The covariance is summed over all k_perp, ignoring possible k_perp-dependent LOS correlations.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption 21cmFAST semi-numerical simulations accurately model the 21cm signal and its light-cone evolution during reionization.
    Used throughout to compute the covariance basis and Fisher derivatives (Section II.B, III.A).
  • domain assumption The 21cm field is statistically isotropic in the angular plane, so Fourier modes remain valid perpendicular to the line of sight.
    Section II.B: 'we can continue using a harmonic basis for the angular direction'.
  • domain assumption The light-cone effect on the covariance is predominantly a 1D effect along the line of sight.
    Section II.B: 'the lightcone effect is predominantly a 1D effect rather than a 3D effect' and thus the LOS covariance can be computed from lines of sight.
  • standard math The Fisher matrix with only the mean of the summary statistic (not its covariance) is sufficient for comparing the information content; any missing variance term only adds information, making the forecasts conservative.
    Section III, footnote 2: 'Ref. [71] showed that for 21cm cosmology at these redshifts, this assumption may not be valid... the forecasts in this paper should be considered conservative ones.'
  • ad hoc to paper The covariance matrix estimated from 10 realizations converges sufficiently for the top 20 eigenvectors to be used without transferring noise into the basis.
    Section II.D: 'we use v_i(z) eigenvectors ranging from i=1 to i=20 to ensure that only the eigenvectors that have converged are retained.' No explicit convergence test is shown.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Beyond the Power Spectrum: A New Framework for Non-Stationary Fields with Applications to Light-Cone Effects in Line Intensity Mapping." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Y62JI5VK

@misc{pith2026250509674,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Beyond the Power Spectrum: A New Framework for Non-Stationary Fields with Applications to Light-Cone Effects in Line Intensity Mapping},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Y62JI5VK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.09674}
}
read the original abstract

Modern cosmological surveys cover extremely large volumes and map fluctuations on scales reaching gigaparsecs. As a result, it is no longer a valid assumption to ignore cosmological evolution along the line of sight from one end of the survey to the other. When extracting cosmological information, the power spectrum becomes suboptimal because it relies on the assumption of translational invariance of the observed field. For example, during the Epoch of Reionization (EoR), the 21cm brightness temperature field on the nearby (low-redshift) end of a large survey volume exhibits statistical properties that differ significantly from those at the far (high-redshift) end. To overcome these limitations, we have developed a eigen decomposition-inspired non-Fourier basis that captures evolution effects. Our work demonstrates that using this new basis integrated in a new summary statistic yields tighter constraints on astrophysical parameters compared to the traditional power spectrum. Additionally, we provide an illustrative example and a practical guide for applying this basis in the context of a realistic forecast for interferometers such as the Hydrogen Epoch of Reionization Array (HERA).

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.09674 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. A light cone slice (top) and two slices of a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The first five basis eigenvectors obtained by diag [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Schematic description of the hybrid basis construc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Power spectrum (or power spectrum-like) quantities [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. description of the Fisher forecast used to generate results in Section IV [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Astrophysical parameter constraints obtained from the standard [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Same as Figure 6, but this time comparing the standard [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The first four basis eigenvectors obtained by diagonalizing different covariance matrices along the redshift extracted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. When galaxies burst II. Implications of enhanced burstiness for the 21-cm Cosmic Dawn signal

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Bursty star formation adds a shot-noise-like term to the Cosmic Dawn 21-cm power spectrum, boosting it by factors of a few at the Wouthuysen-Field trough and strongly on small scales at high redshift.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

117 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    These foregrounds can be up to 10 5 times stronger than the expected 21cm signal, making their mitigation criti- cal [61, 95, 100, 101]

    Foreground avoidance strategy and finite instrumental resolution One of the primary challenges in observing the 21cm signal at high redshift is the presence of foreground con- tamination from both galactic and extragalactic sources. These foregrounds can be up to 10 5 times stronger than the expected 21cm signal, making their mitigation criti- cal [61, 95...

  2. [2]

    These contributions are generally described byT sys, the system temperature, which is the sum of the sky brightness temperatureT sky and the receiver temperatureT rcv

    Instrumental thermal noise The sources of contamination for 21cm observations are primarily thermal noise from the instrument, our galaxy, and our atmosphere. These contributions are generally described byT sys, the system temperature, which is the sum of the sky brightness temperatureT sky and the receiver temperatureT rcv. This contribution is modelled ...

  3. [3]

    Adame, J

    A. Adame, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, D. Alexan- der, M. Alvarez, O. Alves, A. Anand, U. Andrade, E. Armengaud, S. Avila, A. Aviles, H. Awan, B. Bahr- Kalus, S. Bailey, C. Baltay, A. Bault, J. Behera, S. BenZvi, A. Bera, F. Beutler, D. Bianchi, C. Blake, R. Blum, S. Brieden, A. Brodzeller, D. Brooks, E. Buckley-Geer, E. Burtin, R. Calderon, R. Can- nin...

    2024

  4. [4]

    Kollmeier, S

    J. Kollmeier, S. F. Anderson, G. A. Blanc, M. R. Blan- ton, K. R. Covey, J. Crane, N. Drory, P. M. Frinchaboy, C. S. Froning, J. A. Johnson, J. P. Kneib, K. Kreckel, A. Merloni, E. W. Pellegrini, R. W. Pogge, S. V. Ramirez, H. W. Rix, C. Sayres, J. S´ anchez-Gallego, Y. Shen, A. Tkachenko, J. R. Trump, S. E. Tuttle, A. Weijmans, G. Zasowski, B. Barbuy, R....

    2019

  5. [5]

    Scaramella, J

    R. Scaramella, J. Amiaux, Y. Mellier, C. Burigana, C. S. Carvalho, J.-C. Cuillandre, A. Da Silva, A. Derosa, J. Dinis, E. Maiorano, M. Maris, I. Tereno, R. Laureijs, T. Boenke, G. Buenadicha, X. Dupac, L. M. Gaspar Ve- nancio, P. G´ omez-´Alvarez, J. Hoar, J. Lorenzo Al- varez, G. D. Racca, G. Saavedra-Criado, J. Schwartz, R. Vavrek, M. Schirmer, H. Ausse...

    2022

  6. [6]

    P. C. Breysse, D. T. Chung, K. A. Cleary, H. T. Ihle, H. Padmanabhan, M. B. Silva, J. R. Bond, J. Borowska, M. Catha, S. E. Church, D. A. Dunne, H. K. Eriksen, M. K. Foss, T. Gaier, J. O. Gundersen, A. I. Harris, R. Hobbs, L. Keating, J. W. Lamb, C. R. Lawrence, J. G. S. Lunde, N. Murray, T. J. Pearson, L. Philip, M. Rasmussen, A. C. S. Readhead, T. J. Re...

    2022

  7. [7]

    Collaboration, M

    C.-P. Collaboration, M. Aravena, J. E. Austermann, K. Basu, N. Battaglia, B. Beringue, F. Bertoldi, F. Bigiel, J. R. Bond, P. C. Breysse, C. Broughton, 16 R. Bustos, S. C. Chapman, M. Charmetant, S. K. Choi, D. T. Chung, S. E. Clark, N. F. Cothard, A. T. Crites, A. Dev, K. Douglas, C. J. Duell, R. D¨ unner, H. Ebina, J. Erler, M. Fich, L. M. Fissel, S. Fo...

    2022

  8. [8]

    Dumitru, G

    S. Dumitru, G. Kulkarni, G. Lagache, and M. G. Haehnelt, Predictions and sensitivity forecasts for reionization-era [C II] line intensity mapping, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.485, 3486 (2019), arXiv:1802.04804 [astro-ph.GA]

    arXiv 2019

Show all 117 references
  1. [9]

    Dor´ e, J

    O. Dor´ e, J. Bock, M. Ashby, P. Capak, A. Cooray, R. de Putter, T. Eifler, N. Flagey, Y. Gong, S. Habib, K. Heitmann, C. Hirata, W.-S. Jeong, R. Katti, P. Ko- rngut, E. Krause, D.-H. Lee, D. Masters, P. Mauskopf, G. Melnick, B. Mennesson, H. Nguyen, K. ¨Oberg, A. Pullen, A. R...

    2015 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Amiri, K

    M. Amiri, K. Bandura, A. Boskovic, T. Chen, J.-F. Cliche, M. Deng, N. Denman, M. Dobbs, M. Fandino, S. Foreman, M. Halpern, D. Hanna, A. S. Hill, G. Hin- shaw, C. H¨ ofer, J. Kania, P. Klages, T. L. Landecker, J. MacEachern, K. Masui, J. Mena-Parra, N. Miluti- novic, A. Mirhos...

    2022

  3. [11]

    Vanderlinde, A

    K. Vanderlinde, A. Liu, B. Gaensler, D. Bond, G. Hin- shaw, C. Ng, C. Chiang, I. Stairs, J.-A. Brown, J. Sievers, J. Mena, K. Smith, K. Bandura, K. Ma- sui, K. Spekkens, L. Belostotski, M. Dobbs, N. Turok, P. Boyle, M. Rupen, T. Landecker, U.-L. Pen, and V. Kaspi, The canadian...

    2019

  4. [12]

    Matsubara, Y

    T. Matsubara, Y. Suto, and I. Szapudi, Light-cone ef- fect on higher order clustering in redshift surveys, The Astrophysical Journal491, L1–L5 (1997)

    1997

  5. [13]

    Abdurashidova, J

    Z. Abdurashidova, J. E. Aguirre, P. Alexander, Z. S. Ali, Y. Balfour, A. P. Beardsley, G. Bernardi, T. S. Billings, J. D. Bowman, R. F. Bradley, P. Bull, J. Burba, S. Carey, C. L. Carilli, C. Cheng, D. R. DeBoer, M. Dex- ter, E. de Lera Acedo, T. Dibblee-Barkman, J. S. Dil- lo...

    2022

  6. [14]

    Abdurashidova, J

    Z. Abdurashidova, J. E. Aguirre, P. Alexander, Z. S. Ali, Y. Balfour, R. Barkana, A. P. Beardsley, G. Bernardi, T. S. Billings, J. D. Bowman, R. F. Bradley, P. Bull, J. Burba, S. Carey, C. L. Carilli, C. Cheng, D. R. De- Boer, M. Dexter, E. de Lera Acedo, J. S. Dillon, J. Ely,...

    2022

  7. [15]

    M. P. van Haarlem, M. W. Wise, A. W. Gunst, G. Heald, J. P. McKean, J. W. T. Hessels, A. G. de Bruyn, R. Nijboer, J. Swinbank, R. Fallows, M. Bren- tjens, A. Nelles, R. Beck, H. Falcke, R. Fender, J. H¨ orandel, L. V. E. Koopmans, G. Mann, G. Miley, H. R¨ ottgering, B. W. Stap...

    2013

  8. [16]

    J. D. Bowman, I. Cairns, D. L. Kaplan, T. Murphy, D. Oberoi, L. Staveley-Smith, W. Arcus, D. G. Barnes, G. Bernardi, F. H. Briggs, S. Brown, J. D. Bunton, A. J. Burgasser, R. J. Cappallo, S. Chatterjee, B. E. Corey, A. Coster, A. Deshpande, L. deSouza, D. Emrich, P. Er- ickson...

    2013

  9. [17]

    Koopmans, J

    L. Koopmans, J. Pritchard, G. Mellema, J. Aguirre, K. Ahn, R. Barkana, I. van Bemmel, G. Bernardi, A. Bonaldi, F. Briggs, A. G. de Bruyn, T. C. Chang, E. Chapman, X. Chen, B. Courty, P. Dayal, A. Ferrara, A. Fialkov, F. Fiore, K. Ichiki, I. T. Illiev, S. Inoue, V. Jelic, M. Jo...

    2015

  10. [18]

    Barkana and A

    R. Barkana and A. Loeb, Light-cone anisotropy in 21-cm fluctuations during the epoch of reionization, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters372, L43–L47 (2006)

    2006

  11. [19]

    Sethi and Z

    S. Sethi and Z. Haiman, Can We Detect the Anisotropic Shapes of Quasar H II Regions during Reionization through the Small-Scale Redshifted 21 cm Power Spec- trum?, Astrophys. J.673, 1 (2008), arXiv:0705.0981 [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  12. [20]

    La Plante, N

    P. La Plante, N. Battaglia, A. Natarajan, J. B. Peterson, H. Trac, R. Cen, and A. Loeb, Reionization on large scales. iv. predictions for the 21 cm signal incorporating the light cone effect, The Astrophysical Journal789, 31 (2014)

    2014

  13. [21]

    K. K. Datta, H. Jensen, S. Majumdar, G. Mellema, I. T. Iliev, Y. Mao, P. R. Shapiro, and K. Ahn, Light cone effect on the reionization 21-cm signal II: Evolution, anisotropies and observational implications, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.442, 1491 (2014), arXiv:1402.0508 [astro-ph.CO]

    2014 arXiv

  14. [22]

    K. K. Datta, G. Mellema, Y. Mao, I. T. Iliev, P. R. Shapiro, and K. Ahn, Light-cone effect on the reioniza- tion 21-cm power spectrum: Light-cone effect on the 21-cm power spectrum, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society424, 1877–1891 (2012)

    2012

  15. [23]

    Andrews, J

    A. Andrews, J. Jasche, G. Lavaux, and F. Schmidt, Bayesian field-level inference of primordial non- gaussianity using next-generation galaxy surveys, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society520, 5746–5763 (2023)

    2023

  16. [24]

    Jasche, F

    J. Jasche, F. S. Kitaura, C. Li, and T. A. Enßlin, Bayesian non-linear large-scale structure inference of the sloan digital sky survey data release 7: Bayesian non- linear lss inference of the sdss dr 7, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society409, 355–370 (2010)

    2010

  17. [25]

    H. Wang, H. J. Mo, X. Yang, Y. P. Jing, and W. P. Lin, Elucid—exploring the local universe with the re- constructed initial density field. i. hamiltonian markov chain monte carlo method with particle mesh dynamics, The Astrophysical Journal794, 94 (2014)

    2014

  18. [26]

    Lavaux and J

    G. Lavaux and J. Jasche, Unmasking the masked uni- verse: the 2m++ catalogue through bayesian eyes, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society455, 3169 (2016)

    2016

  19. [27]

    Schmittfull and U

    M. Schmittfull and U. Seljak, Parameter constraints from cross-correlation of cmb lensing with galaxy clus- tering, Physical Review D97, 123540 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    Porqueres, O

    N. Porqueres, O. Hahn, J. Jasche, and G. Lavaux, A hierarchical field-level inference approach to reconstruc- tion from sparse lyman-alpha forest data, Astronomy & Astrophysics642, A139 (2020)

    2020

  21. [29]

    Schmidt, G

    F. Schmidt, G. Cabass, J. Jasche, and G. Lavaux, Unbi- ased cosmology inference from biased tracers using the eft likelihood, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2020(11), 008–008

  22. [30]

    X. Zhao, Y. Mao, C. Cheng, and B. D. Wandelt, Simulation-based inference of reionization parameters from 3d tomographic 21 cm light-cone images, The As- trophysical Journal926, 151 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    Prelogovi´ c, A

    D. Prelogovi´ c, A. Mesinger, S. Murray, G. Fiameni, and N. Gillet, Machine learning astrophysics from 21cm lightcones: impact of network architectures and signal contamination, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronom- ical Society509, 3852–3867 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    Charnock, G

    T. Charnock, G. Lavaux, and B. D. Wandelt, Auto- matic physical inference with information maximizing 18 neural networks, Physical Review D97, 10.1103/phys- revd.97.083004 (2018)

    2018 doi

  25. [33]

    Gillet, A

    N. Gillet, A. Mesinger, B. Greig, A. Liu, and G. Ucci, Deep learning from 21-cm tomography of the cosmic dawn and reionization, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 10.1093/mnras/stz010 (2019)

    2019 doi

  26. [34]

    Hassan, A

    S. Hassan, A. Liu, S. Kohn, and P. L. Plante, Identify- ing reionization sources from 21cm maps using convo- lutional neural networks, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 10.1093/mnras/sty3282 (2018)

    2018 doi

  27. [35]

    Zhou and P

    Y. Zhou and P. La Plante, Understanding the impact of semi-numeric reionization models when using cnns, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 134, 044001 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    T. S. Billings, P. La Plante, and J. E. Aguirre, Extract- ing the optical depth to reionizationτfrom 21 cm data using machine learning techniques, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific133, 044001 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    Th´ elie, F

    E. Th´ elie, F. D. Balso, J. B. Mu˜ noz, and A. Liu, An alcock-paczynski test on reionization bubbles for cos- mology (2025), arXiv:2502.02638 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Hiegel, E

    J. Hiegel, E. Th´ elie, D. Aubert, J. Chardin, N. Gillet, P. Galois, N. Mai, P. Ocvirk, and R. Ibata, Reionisa- tion time field reconstruction from 21 cm signal maps, Astronomy & Astrophysics679, A125 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Neutsch, C

    S. Neutsch, C. Heneka, and M. Br¨ uggen, Inferring as- trophysics and dark matter properties from 21 cm to- mography using deep learning, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society511, 3446–3462 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    A. Ore, C. Heneka, and T. Plehn, Skatr: A self- supervised summary transformer for ska, SciPost Physics18, 10.21468/scipostphys.18.5.155 (2025)

    2025 doi

  33. [41]

    Kennedy, J

    J. Kennedy, J. C. Carr, S. Gagnon-Hartman, A. Liu, J. Mirocha, and Y. Cui, Machine-learning recovery of foreground wedge-removed 21-cm light cones for high-z galaxy mapping, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro- nomical Society529, 3684–3698 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    Gagnon-Hartman, Y

    S. Gagnon-Hartman, Y. Cui, A. Liu, and S. Ravan- bakhsh, Recovering the wedge modes lost to 21-cm fore- grounds, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society504, 4716–4729 (2021)

    2021

  35. [43]

    Ghosh, S

    A. Ghosh, S. Bharadwaj, S. S. Ali, and J. N. Chen- galur, Improved foreground removal in gmrt 610mhz observations towards redshifted 21-cm tomography: Im- proved 21-cm foreground removal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society418, 2584–2589 (2011)

    2011

  36. [44]

    Paciga, J

    G. Paciga, J. G. Albert, K. Bandura, T.-C. Chang, Y. Gupta, C. M. Hirata, J. Odegova, U.-L. Pen, J. B. Pe- terson, J. Roy, J. R. Shaw, K. Sigurdson, and T. Voytek, A simulation-calibrated limit on the h i power spec- trum from the gmrt epoch of reionization experiment, Monthly...

    2013

  37. [45]

    A. R. Parsons, A. Liu, J. E. Aguirre, Z. S. Ali, R. F. Bradley, C. L. Carilli, D. R. DeBoer, M. R. Dexter, N. E. Gugliucci, D. C. Jacobs, P. J. Klima, D. H. E. MacMa- hon, J. R. Manley, D. F. Moore, J. C. Pober, and I. I. Stefan, New limits on 21 cm epoch of reionization from ...

    2014

  38. [46]

    J. S. Dillon, A. Liu, C. L. Williams, J. N. Hewitt, M. Tegmark, E. H. Morgan, A. M. Levine, M. F. Morales, S. J. Tingay, G. Bernardi, J. D. Bowman, F. H. Briggs, R. C. Cappallo, D. Emrich, D. A. Mitchell, D. Oberoi, T. Prabu, R. Wayth, and R. L. Webster, Overcoming real-world ...

    2014 doi

  39. [47]

    J. S. Dillon, A. R. Neben, J. N. Hewitt, M. Tegmark, N. Barry, A. Beardsley, J. Bowman, F. Briggs, P. Car- roll, A. de Oliveira-Costa, A. Ewall-Wice, L. Feng, L. Greenhill, B. Hazelton, L. Hernquist, N. Hurley- Walker, D. Jacobs, H. Kim, P. Kittiwisit, E. Lenc, J. Line, A. Loe...

    2015

  40. [48]

    Ewall-Wice, J

    A. Ewall-Wice, J. Hewitt, A. Mesinger, J. S. Dillon, A. Liu, and J. Pober, Constraining high-redshift x-ray sources with next generation 21-cm power spectrum measurements, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronom- ical Society458, 2710–2724 (2016)

    2016

  41. [49]

    A. H. Patil, S. Yatawatta, L. V. E. Koopmans, A. G. d. Bruyn, M. A. Brentjens, S. Zaroubi, K. M. B. Asad, M. Hatef, V. Jeli´ c, M. Mevius, A. R. Offringa, V. N. Pandey, H. Vedantham, F. B. Abdalla, W. N. Brouw, E. Chapman, B. Ciardi, B. K. Gehlot, A. Ghosh, G. Harker, I. T. Il...

    2017

  42. [50]

    A. P. Beardsley, B. J. Hazelton, I. S. Sullivan, P. Car- roll, N. Barry, M. Rahimi, B. Pindor, C. M. Trott, J. Line, D. C. Jacobs, M. F. Morales, J. C. Pober, G. Bernardi, J. D. Bowman, M. P. Busch, F. Briggs, R. J. Cappallo, B. E. Corey, A. d. Oliveira-Costa, J. S. Dillon, D....

    2016

  43. [51]

    Barry, M

    N. Barry, M. Wilensky, C. M. Trott, B. Pindor, A. P. Beardsley, B. J. Hazelton, I. S. Sullivan, M. F. Morales, J. C. Pober, J. Line, B. Greig, R. Byrne, A. Lan- man, W. Li, C. H. Jordan, R. C. Joseph, B. McKin- ley, M. Rahimi, S. Yoshiura, J. D. Bowman, B. M. 19 Gaensler, J. N...

    2019

  44. [52]

    M. W. Eastwood, M. M. Anderson, R. M. Monroe, G. Hallinan, M. Catha, J. Dowell, H. Garsden, L. J. Greenhill, B. C. Hicks, J. Kocz, D. C. Price, F. K. Schinzel, H. Vedantham, and Y. Wang, The 21 cm power spectrum from the cosmic dawn: First results from the ovro-lwa, The Astron...

    2019

  45. [53]

    W. Li, J. C. Pober, N. Barry, B. J. Hazelton, M. F. Morales, C. M. Trott, A. Lanman, M. Wilensky, I. Sul- livan, A. P. Beardsley, T. Booler, J. D. Bowman, R. Byrne, B. Crosse, D. Emrich, T. M. O. Franzen, K. Hasegawa, L. Horsley, M. Johnston-Hollitt, D. C. Jacobs, C. H. Jordan...

    2019

  46. [54]

    B. K. Gehlot, F. G. Mertens, L. V. E. Koopmans, M. A. Brentjens, S. Zaroubi, B. Ciardi, A. Ghosh, M. Hatef, I. T. Iliev, V. Jeli´ c, R. Kooistra, F. Krause, G. Mellema, M. Mevius, M. Mitra, A. R. Offringa, V. N. Pandey, A. M. Sardarabadi, J. Schaye, M. B. Silva, H. K. Vedan- t...

    2019

  47. [55]

    C. M. Trott, C. H. Jordan, S. Midgley, N. Barry, B. Greig, B. Pindor, J. H. Cook, G. Sleap, S. J. Tingay, D. Ung, P. Hancock, A. Williams, J. Bowman, R. Byrne, A. Chokshi, B. J. Hazelton, K. Hasegawa, D. Jacobs, R. C. Joseph, W. Li, J. L. B. Line, C. Lynch, B. McKin- ley, D. A...

    2020

  48. [56]

    F. G. Mertens, M. Mevius, L. V. E. Koopmans, A. R. Offringa, G. Mellema, S. Zaroubi, M. A. Brentjens, H. Gan, B. K. Gehlot, V. N. Pandey, A. M. Sardarabadi, H. K. Vedantham, S. Yatawatta, K. M. B. Asad, B. Cia- rdi, E. Chapman, S. Gazagnes, R. Ghara, A. Ghosh, S. K. Giri, I. T...

    2020

  49. [57]

    Chakraborty, A

    A. Chakraborty, A. Datta, N. Roy, S. Bharadwaj, T. R. Choudhury, K. K. Datta, S. Pal, M. Choudhury, S. Choudhuri, P. Dutta, and D. Sarkar, First multi- redshift limits on post–epoch of reionization 21 cm sig- nal from z=1.96–3.58 using ugmrt, The Astrophysical Journal Letters9...

    2021

  50. [58]

    Yoshiura, B

    S. Yoshiura, B. Pindor, J. L. B. Line, N. Barry, C. M. Trott, A. Beardsley, J. Bowman, R. Byrne, A. Chok- shi, B. J. Hazelton, K. Hasegawa, E. Howard, B. Greig, D. Jacobs, C. H. Jordan, R. Joseph, M. Kolopanis, C. Lynch, B. McKinley, D. A. Mitchell, M. F. Morales, S. G. Murray...

    2021

  51. [59]

    T. H. C. Z. Abdurashidova, T. Adams, J. E. Aguirre, P. Alexander, Z. S. Ali, R. Baartman, Y. Balfour, R. Barkana, A. P. Beardsley, G. Bernardi, T. S. Billings, J. D. Bowman, R. F. Bradley, D. Breitman, P. Bull, J. Burba, S. Carey, C. L. Carilli, C. Cheng, S. Choud- huri, D. R....

    2023

  52. [61]

    Munshi, F

    S. Munshi, F. G. Mertens, L. V. E. Koopmans, A. R. Offringa, B. Semelin, D. Aubert, R. Barkana, A. Bracco, S. A. Brackenhoff, B. Cecconi, E. Ceccotti, S. Corbel, A. Fialkov, B. K. Gehlot, R. Ghara, J. N. Girard, J. M. Grießmeier, C. H¨ ofer, I. Hothi, R. M´ eriot, M. Mevius, P...

    2024

  53. [62]

    Liu and J

    A. Liu and J. R. Shaw, Data analysis for precision 21 cm cosmology, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific132, 062001 (2020)

    2020

  54. [63]

    M. G. Santos, A. Cooray, and L. Knox, Multifrequency analysis of 21 centimeter fluctuations from the era of reionization, The Astrophysical Journal625, 575–587 (2005)

    2005

  55. [64]

    K. K. Datta, T. R. Choudhury, and S. Bharadwaj, The multifrequency angular power spectrum of the epoch of 20 reionization 21-cm signal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society378, 119–128 (2007)

    2007

  56. [65]

    C. M. Trott, R. Mondal, G. Mellema, S. G. Murray, B. Greig, J. L. B. Line, N. Barry, and M. F. Morales, Multi-frequency angular power spectrum of the 21 cm signal from the epoch of reionisation using the murchi- son widefield array, Astronomy &; Astrophysics666, A106 (2022)

    2022

  57. [66]

    A. K. Shaw, R. Ghara, S. Zaroubi, R. Mondal, G. Mellema, F. Mertens, L. V. E. Koopmans, and B. Semelin, Studying the multifrequency angular power spectrum of the cosmic dawn 21-cm signal, Monthly No- tices of the Royal Astronomical Society522, 2188–2206 (2023)

    2023

  58. [67]

    Pramanick, S

    S. Pramanick, S. Bharadwaj, K. M. A. Elahi, and R. Mondal, The evolving power spectrum for the light cone epoch of reionization 21 cm signal, The Astrophys- ical Journal984, 105 (2025)

    2025

  59. [68]

    C. M. Trott, Exploring the evolution of reionization using a wavelet transform and the light cone effect, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society461, 126–135 (2016)

    2016

  60. [69]

    Hothi, E

    I. Hothi, E. Allys, B. Semelin, and F. Boulanger, Wavelet-based statistics for enhanced 21cm eor param- eter constraints, Astronomy &; Astrophysics686, A212 (2024)

    2024

  61. [70]

    Greig, Y.-S

    B. Greig, Y.-S. Ting, and A. A. Kaurov, Exploring the cosmic 21-cm signal from the epoch of reionization using the wavelet scattering transform, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society513, 1719–1741 (2022)

    2022

  62. [71]

    Cheng, Y.-S

    S. Cheng, Y.-S. Ting, B. M´ enard, and J. Bruna, A new approach to observational cosmology using the scatter- ing transform, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronom- ical Society499, 5902–5914 (2020)

    2020

  63. [72]

    Shimabukuro, Y

    H. Shimabukuro, Y. Xu, and Y. Shao, Analyzing the 21cm forest with wavelet scattering transform: Insight into non-gaussian features of the 21cm forest (2025), arXiv:2504.14656 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025

  64. [73]

    Prelogovi´ c and A

    D. Prelogovi´ c and A. Mesinger, How informative are summaries of the cosmic 21 cm signal?, Astronomy &; Astrophysics688, A199 (2024)

    2024

  65. [74]

    C. Sui, X. Zhao, T. Jing, and Y. Mao, Evaluating sum- mary statistics with mutual information for cosmologi- cal inference (2023), arXiv:2307.04994 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  66. [75]

    Mesinger, S

    A. Mesinger, S. Furlanetto, and R. Cen, 21cmfast: a fast, seminumerical simulation of the high-redshift 21- cm signal: 21cmfast, Monthly Notices of the Royal As- tronomical Society411, 955–972 (2010)

    2010

  67. [76]

    J. Park, A. Mesinger, B. Greig, and N. Gillet, Infer- ring the astrophysics of reionization and cosmic dawn from galaxy luminosity functions and the 21-cm signal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society484, 933–949 (2019)

    2019

  68. [77]

    Murray, B

    S. Murray, B. Greig, A. Mesinger, J. Mu˜ noz, Y. Qin, J. Park, and C. Watkinson, 21cmfast v3: A python- integrated c code for generating 3d realizations of the cosmic 21cm signal., Journal of Open Source Software 5, 2582 (2020)

    2020

  69. [78]

    Collaboration, N

    P. Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini, A. J. Ban- day, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, S. Basak, R. Battye, K. Benabed, J.-P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, J. J. Bock, J. R. Bond, J. Borrill, F. R. Bouchet, F. Boulang...

    2020

  70. [79]

    S. G. Murray, powerbox: A python package for creating structured fields with isotropic power spectra, Journal of Open Source Software3, 850 (2018)

    2018

  71. [80]

    A. R. Parsons, J. C. Pober, J. E. Aguirre, C. L. Car- illi, D. C. Jacobs, and D. F. Moore, A per-baseline, delay-spectrum technique for accessing the 21 cm cos- mic reionization signature, The Astrophysical Journal 756, 165 (2012)

    2012

  72. [81]

    A. Liu, A. R. Parsons, and C. M. Trott, Epoch of reion- ization window. i. mathematical formalism, Phys. Rev. D90, 023018 (2014)

    2014

  73. [82]

    Bharadwaj and S

    S. Bharadwaj and S. S. Ali, On using visibility correla- tions to probe the hi distribution from the dark ages to the present epoch - i. formalism and the expected sig- nal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 356, 1519–1528 (2005)

    2005

  74. [83]

    Barkana and A

    R. Barkana and A. Loeb, A method for separating the physics from the astrophysics of high-redshift 21 cen- timeter fluctuations, The Astrophysical Journal624, L65–L68 (2005)

    2005

  75. [84]

    Greig and A

    B. Greig and A. Mesinger, 21cmmc with a 3d light- 21 cone: the impact of the co-evolution approximation on the astrophysics of reionization and cosmic dawn, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society477, 3217–3229 (2018)

    2018

  76. [85]

    Datta, J

    A. Datta, J. D. Bowman, and C. L. Carilli, Bright source subtraction requirements for redshifted 21 cm measure- ments, The Astrophysical Journal724, 526–538 (2010)

    2010

  77. [86]

    M. F. Morales, B. Hazelton, I. Sullivan, and A. Beard- sley, Four fundamental foreground power spectrum shapes for 21 cm cosmology observations, The Astro- physical Journal752, 137 (2012)

    2012

  78. [87]

    Vedantham, N

    H. Vedantham, N. Udaya Shankar, and R. Subrah- manyan, Imaging the epoch of reionization: Limitations from foreground confusion and imaging algorithms, The Astrophysical Journal745, 176 (2012)

    2012

  79. [88]

    C. M. Trott, R. B. Wayth, and S. J. Tingay, The impact of point-source subtraction residuals on 21 cm epoch of reionization estimation, The Astrophysical Journal757, 101 (2012)

    2012

  80. [89]

    B. J. Hazelton, M. F. Morales, and I. S. Sullivan, The fundamental multi-baseline mode-mixing foreground in 21 cm epoch of reionization observations, The Astro- physical Journal770, 156 (2013)

    2013

  81. [90]

    J. C. Pober, A. R. Parsons, J. E. Aguirre, Z. Ali, R. F. Bradley, C. L. Carilli, D. DeBoer, M. Dexter, N. E. Gugliucci, D. C. Jacobs, P. J. Klima, D. MacMahon, J. Manley, D. F. Moore, I. I. Stefan, and W. P. Wal- brugh, Opening the 21 cm epoch of reionization win- dow: Measure...

    2013

  82. [91]

    Thyagarajan, N

    N. Thyagarajan, N. Udaya Shankar, R. Subrahmanyan, W. Arcus, G. Bernardi, J. D. Bowman, F. Briggs, J. D. Bunton, R. J. Cappallo, B. E. Corey, L. deSouza, D. Emrich, B. M. Gaensler, R. F. Goeke, L. J. Greenhill, B. J. Hazelton, D. Herne, J. N. Hewitt, M. Johnston- Hollitt, D. L...

    2013

  83. [92]

    A. Liu, A. R. Parsons, and C. M. Trott, Epoch of reion- ization window. ii. statistical methods for foreground wedge reduction, Phys. Rev. D90, 023019 (2014)

    2014

  84. [93]

    Cheng, A

    C. Cheng, A. R. Parsons, M. Kolopanis, D. C. Ja- cobs, A. Liu, S. A. Kohn, J. E. Aguirre, J. C. Pober, Z. S. Ali, G. Bernardi, R. F. Bradley, C. L. Carilli, D. R. DeBoer, M. R. Dexter, J. S. Dillon, P. Klima, D. H. E. MacMahon, D. F. Moore, C. D. Nunhokee, W. P. Walbrugh, and ...

    2018 arXiv

  85. [94]

    Albrecht, L

    A. Albrecht, L. Amendola, G. Bernstein, D. Clowe, D. Eisenstein, L. Guzzo, C. Hirata, D. Huterer, R. Kir- shner, E. Kolb, and R. Nichol, Findings of the joint dark energy mission figure of merit science working group (2009), arXiv:0901.0721 [astro-ph.IM]

    2009 arXiv

  86. [95]

    A. Liu, J. R. Pritchard, M. Tegmark, and A. Loeb, Global 21cm signal experiments: A designer’s guide, Physical Review D87, 10.1103/physrevd.87.043002 (2013)

    2013 doi

  87. [96]

    J. B. Mu˜ noz, C. Dvorkin, and F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, Prob- ing the small-scale matter power spectrum with large- scale 21-cm data, Phys. Rev. D101, 063526 (2020)

    2020

  88. [97]

    J. C. Pober, A. Liu, J. S. Dillon, J. E. Aguirre, J. D. Bowman, R. F. Bradley, C. L. Carilli, D. R. DeBoer, J. N. Hewitt, D. C. Jacobs, M. McQuinn, M. F. Morales, A. R. Parsons, M. Tegmark, and D. J. Werthimer, What next-generation 21 cm power spectrum measurements can teach u...

    2014

  89. [98]

    M. E. Presley, A. Liu, and A. R. Parsons, Measuring the cosmological 21 cm monopole with an interferometer, The Astrophysical Journal809, 18 (2015)

    2015

  90. [99]

    Shimabukuro, S

    H. Shimabukuro, S. Yoshiura, K. Takahashi, S. Yokoyama, and K. Ichiki, Constraining the epoch-of-reionization model parameters with the 21-cm bispectrum, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society468, 1542–1550 (2017)

    2017

  91. [100]

    A. K. Shaw, S. Bharadwaj, and R. Mondal, The impact of non-gaussianity on the epoch of reionization parame- ter forecast using 21-cm power-spectrum measurements, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society498, 1480–1495 (2020)

    2020

  92. [101]

    Prelogovi´ c and A

    D. Prelogovi´ c and A. Mesinger, Exploring the likelihood of the 21-cm power spectrum with simulation-based in- ference, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical So- ciety524, 4239–4255 (2023)

    2023

  93. [102]

    Bernardi, A

    M. Bernardi, A. Meert, R. K. Sheth, V. Vikram, M. Huertas-Company, S. Mei, and F. Shankar, The mas- sive end of the luminosity and stellar mass functions: dependence on the fit to the light profile, Monthly No- tices of the Royal Astronomical Society436, 697–704 (2013)

    2013

  94. [103]

    Yatawatta, A

    S. Yatawatta, A. G. de Bruyn, M. A. Brentjens, P. Labropoulos, V. N. Pandey, S. Kazemi, S. Zaroubi, L. V. E. Koopmans, A. R. Offringa, V. Jeli´ c, O. Mar- tinez Rubi, V. Veligatla, S. J. Wijnholds, W. N. Brouw, G. Bernardi, B. Ciardi, S. Daiboo, G. Harker, G. Mellema, J. Schay...

    2013

  95. [104]

    W. Qin, K. Schutz, O. Rosenstein, S. O’Neil, and 22 M. Vogelsberger, Supersizing hydrodynamical simu- lations of reionization using perturbative techniques (2025), arXiv:2504.02929 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  96. [105]

    Diao and Y

    K. Diao and Y. Mao, Multi-fidelity emulator for cos- mological large scale 21 cm lightcone images: a few-shot transfer learning approach with gan (2023), arXiv:2307.04976 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  97. [106]

    Pochinda, J

    S. Pochinda, J. Dhandha, A. Fialkov, and E. de Lera Acedo, Cosmological super-resolution of the 21-cm signal (2025), arXiv:2502.00852 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  98. [107]

    S. G. Murray, J. Pober, and M. Kolopanis, 21cmsense v2: A modular, open-source 21 cm sensitivity calcula- tor, Journal of Open Source Software9, 6501 (2024)

    2024

  99. [108]

    J. C. Pober, A. R. Parsons, D. R. DeBoer, P. McDon- ald, M. McQuinn, J. E. Aguirre, Z. Ali, R. F. Bradley, T.-C. Chang, and M. F. Morales, The baryon acous- tic oscillation broadband and broad-beam array: De- sign overview and sensitivity forecasts, The Astronom- ical Journal1...

    2013

  100. [109]

    C. A. Mason, J. B. Mu˜ noz, B. Greig, A. Mesinger, and J. Park, 21cmfish: Fisher-matrix framework for fast parameter forecasts from the cosmic 21-cm signal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society524, 4711–4728 (2023)

    2023

  101. [110]

    M. J. Wilensky, M. F. Morales, B. J. Hazelton, P. L. Star, N. Barry, R. Byrne, C. H. Jordan, D. C. Jacobs, J. C. Pober, and C. M. Trott, Evidence of ultrafaint ra- dio frequency interference in deep 21 cm epoch of reion- ization power spectra with the murchison wide-field ar- ...

    2023

  102. [111]

    M. J. Wilensky, N. Barry, M. F. Morales, B. J. Hazelton, and R. Byrne, Quantifying excess power from radio fre- quency interference in Epoch of Reionization measure- ments, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.498, 265 (2020), arXiv:2004.07819 [astro-ph.IM]

    2020 arXiv

  103. [112]

    Munshi, F

    S. Munshi, F. G. Mertens, L. V. E. Koopmans, M. Mevius, A. R. Offringa, B. Semelin, C. Viou, A. Bracco, S. A. Brackenhoff, E. Ceccotti, J. K. Chege, A. Fialkov, L. Y. Gao, R. Ghara, S. Ghosh, A. K. Shaw, P. Zarka, S. Zaroubi, B. Cecconi, S. Corbel, J. N. Girard, J. M. Griessme...

    2025 arXiv

  104. [113]

    B. K. Gehlot, L. V. E. Koopmans, S. A. Bracken- hoff, E. Ceccotti, S. Ghosh, C. H¨ ofer, F. G. Mertens, M. Mevius, S. Munshi, A. R. Offringa, V. N. Pandey, A. Rowlinson, A. Shulevski, R. A. M. J. Wijers, S. Yatawatta, and S. Zaroubi, Transient rfi environment of lofar-lba at 7...

    2024

  105. [114]

    W. Li, H. Xu, Z. Ma, R. Zhu, D. Hu, Z. Zhu, J. Gu, C. Shan, J. Zhu, and X.-P. Wu, Separating the eor sig- nal with a convolutional denoising autoencoder: a deep- learning-based method, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society485, 2628–2637 (2019)

    2019

  106. [115]

    T. L. Makinen, L. Lancaster, F. Villaescusa-Navarro, P. Melchior, S. Ho, L. Perreault-Levasseur, and D. N. Spergel, deep21: a deep learning method for 21 cm fore- ground removal, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparti- cle Physics2021(04), 081

  107. [116]

    Bianco, S

    M. Bianco, S. K. Giri, R. Sharma, T. Chen, S. P. Kr- ishna, C. Finlay, V. Nistane, P. Denzel, M. D. Santis, and H. Ghorbel, Deep learning approach for identifica- tion of hii regions during reionization in 21-cm obser- vations – iii. image recovery (2024), arXiv:2408.16814 [as...

    2024 arXiv

  108. [117]

    Sabti, R

    N. Sabti, R. Reddy, J. B. Mu˜ noz, S. Mishra- Sharma, and T. Youn, A generative modeling approach to reconstructing 21-cm tomographic data (2024), arXiv:2407.21097 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  109. [118]

    Smith and J

    W. Smith and J. C. Pober, Detecting the 21 cm signal of the cosmic dark ages (2025), arXiv:2504.08965 [astro- ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.