Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 46 references

Context-AI Tunes: Context-Aware AI-Generated Music for Stress Reduction

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Context-aware AI music beats static playlists for stress relief.

desk verdict A plausible but under-controlled demo of AI-generated context-adaptive music for stress relief; the headline ANOVA statistic doesn't add up, and the active ingredient is not isolated. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.09872 v1 pith:GI7TPN62 submitted 2025-05-15 cs.HC

Xiaoyan Wei , Zebang Zhang , Zijian Yue , Hsiang-Ting Chen This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.HC
keywords generativeAImusicstressreductioncontext-awaresystemhuman-computerinteractionwithin-subjectexperimentVAS-Sadaptivegeneration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes that music generated on the spot from the listener's current environment and self-reported stress level relieves stress more effectively than a pre-recorded relaxing track chosen by the listener. It builds Context-AI Tune (CAT), a system that turns a camera snapshot of the surroundings and a stress slider into a text prompt that a generative music service turns into a track. In a within-subject experiment with 26 participants, self-reported stress dropped more after listening to CAT music than after listening to a popular YouTube relaxing track, in both a busy hub and a quiet library. The claim matters because choosing relaxing music is normally a slow, trial-and-error process, and a system that adapts could make stress relief faster and more targeted.

What carries the argument

The system's mechanism is a generation pipeline: a camera captures the environment, a visual language model extracts descriptive keywords, the user selects keywords and sets a stress-level slider, and a commercial music-generation API produces two tracks from the compiled prompt. The experimental machinery is a 2x2 within-subject design crossing music type (AI vs NoAI) with environment (Busy Hub vs Quiet Library), with stress induced by timed arithmetic tasks and measured by the Visual Analog Scale for Stress at four time points. The load-bearing comparison is the AI-versus-NoAI contrast within each environment, and the reported significance of that contrast is what carries the paper's claim.

What would settle it

Run a control condition that plays AI-generated music created from generic, non-contextual prompts, with no environment input and no stress-level input, in the same busy and quiet settings. If this non-context AI music produces the same VAS-S reductions as CAT, the paper's claim that adapting to user context is what makes CAT effective would be falsified, because the effect would instead be attributable to AI generation, personalization, or novelty.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that CAT is more effective than manually chosen music in reducing stress by adapting to user context. Formally, the paper reports a significant main effect of the AI factor on VAS-S change scores, $F(3,23)=12.135$, $p<.001$, with pairwise Wilcoxon tests showing significantly larger stress reductions for the AI-generated music than for pre-recorded music in both environments after Bonferroni correction, while environment alone showed no significant effect. The authors interpret this as evidence that personalized, context-aware generated music outperforms static relaxing music for stress reduction, and that the adaptation itself, rather than the listening setting, drives the benefit.

Load-bearing premise

The experiment assumes that the only meaningful difference between the AI and NoAI conditions is contextual adaptation, but the AI condition also differs in being freshly generated, personalized through user-selected prompts, and novel, so the measured effect may not isolate adaptation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Context-aware generated music can deliver larger self-reported stress reductions than static playlists in both noisy and quiet environments.
  • The listening environment itself need not determine relief; an adaptive music intervention can work in busy as well as quiet settings.
  • Giving users control over prompt keywords and a stress slider can produce engaging, personalized listening experiences suitable for stress management.
  • A practical pipeline that uses a camera snapshot and a self-report slider can generate personalized relaxing music in real time.
  • The authors' proposed extension to physiological sensors would make future adaptation more objective and less dependent on self-report.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: a natural next experiment, not run here, would compare CAT against AI-generated music produced without environmental or stress inputs; that would separate adaptation from generation and novelty.
  • Editorial inference: because the AI condition required the user to choose prompts and set the stress slider, some of the measured benefit may come from a sense of control; a fully automatic system might not preserve the effect.
  • Editorial inference: the same camera-to-prompt pipeline could generalize beyond music to other real-time relaxation modalities, such as soundscapes or visual environments, with minimal change.
  • Editorial inference: the null environment effect hints that CAT could work in noisy shared spaces, but real-world deployment needs longer listening periods and out-of-lab trials to confirm durability.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces Context-AI Tune (CAT), a system that uses a camera, a visual language model, and the Suno API to generate relaxing music from environmental keywords and a user-reported stress level. The authors report a 2x2 within-subject study (N=26) crossing AI versus NoAI music with two environments (busy hub, quiet library), using a math task to induce stress and VAS-S to measure stress at four time points. They report that AI-generated music produced larger VAS-S reductions than pre-recorded YouTube relaxing music in both environments, with pairwise comparisons significant after Bonferroni correction, and they interpret this as evidence that context-aware AI-generated music reduces stress by adapting to user context. Interview data are presented to support perceived adaptability, engagement, and stress reduction.

Significance. If the reported effects hold, the paper offers a useful early demonstration that generative music systems can incorporate environmental and self-report inputs for stress management, and the choice of two real environments is a strength. The system implementation is described concretely, and the within-subject design with repeated VAS-S measurement is appropriate for a feasibility study. However, the central statistical support is internally inconsistent as reported, and the design does not isolate context-adaptive generation from personalization, user control, or novelty. The paper does not include raw data or a reproducible analysis, which weakens confidence in the headline claim. These issues are fixable, and the contribution could be reframed as a preliminary system evaluation.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.1, Fig. 4, Table 1] The headline statistic F(3,23)=12.135, p<.001 reported for a 'significant main effect of AI' cannot be correct as stated: with N=26 and a two-level within-subject AI factor, the main-effect F would have (1,25) degrees of freedom, and Mauchly's test does not apply to a two-level factor because sphericity is automatically satisfied. The surrounding text also shifts between 'VAS-S changing scores' (one value per condition) and 'the four testing phases,' so it is unclear whether the reported F is for a Phase effect, a Condition effect, or an interaction. Because this statistic is the only direct statistical support for the Abstract's claim, the paper needs a corrected analysis or the raw data before the central claim can be evaluated.
  2. [§4.2, §5.1] The AI versus NoAI contrast is not a clean test of context-adaptive music generation. In the AI condition participants scanned the environment, selected or modified prompts, set their stress level, and listened to freshly generated Suno tracks; in the NoAI condition they listened to a fixed YouTube track with none of these activities. The observed difference could therefore be due to personalization, user control, novelty, prompt selection, or acoustic differences rather than to adaptation to environmental or stress context. The claim that 'CAT is more effective ... by adapting to user context' requires a control condition in which AI generates music without environmental or stress inputs, or a manipulation that varies context inputs while holding generation and personalization constant. As it stands, the mechanism claim is under-identified.
  3. [§5.1, §6] The Discussion states that results were 'statistically significant with large effect sizes' and refers to a 'significant interaction over time,' but no effect sizes or interaction statistics are reported anywhere in §5.1. Likewise, the text says 'the AI led to a greater reduction in stress compared to the NoAI condition across all phases,' but the preceding analysis defines a single change score per condition, not a time course. These statements need either the supporting statistics or a revised description of the statistical model.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§5.1] The text contains a literal 'Table??' placeholder and references a summary table of means and standard deviations that is not present; the table should be included or the reference removed.
  2. [§1 vs. §4] The second independent variable is called 'Neighbor' in the Introduction but 'Environment' everywhere else; the names should be unified.
  3. [§4.2 vs. §5.1] The VAS-S citation appears as [7] in §4.2 but as [27] in §5.1; please verify which scale was actually used and cite it consistently.
  4. [§5.2] The interview analysis refers to 'GSR trends,' but no GSR or other physiological data are described in the method or results; either add the data or remove the reference.
  5. [§5.1] The definition of 'VAS-S Change Score' as an 'absolute difference' should be clarified: if the intended quantity is a signed difference (after-math minus after-music), saying 'absolute' obscures the direction of stress change and could misrepresent participants whose stress increased.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the study's claim is an empirical comparison of AI-generated versus pre-recorded music against an external baseline, with no derivation fitted to its own conclusion.

full rationale

The paper contains no derivation chain whose predictions reduce to its inputs. Its central claim, that CAT is more effective than manually chosen music in reducing stress, is supported by a within-subject experiment comparing AI-generated music to pre-recorded YouTube relaxing music. The dependent variable, VAS-S change scores, is measured independently of the system's inputs, and no parameter is fitted from the outcome and then renamed as a prediction. The AI and NoAI conditions are defined as distinct experimental manipulations, and the NoAI comparison is an external baseline rather than a quantity derived from the CAT system's own components. The authors' prior publications appear only as ordinary related-work citations (e.g., refs. 44-46 on virtual-reality stress) and are not load-bearing for the reported result. The paper's ANOVA df inconsistency and the confounded AI condition are validity or reporting concerns, not circularity: they do not show that the claim is equivalent to its inputs by construction. The analysis therefore finds no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The result is an empirical system evaluation, so there are no fitted parameters. The listed axioms are the background assumptions about measurement validity, stress induction, and API reliability that the study depends on. None of them is independently verified in the paper.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption VAS-S is a valid and sensitive measure of transient stress in this context.
    All quantitative outcomes rely on self-reported Visual Analog Scale for Stress; no physiological validation is used in the main analysis (Section 4.2, Section 5.1).
  • domain assumption The timed math task with leaderboard and auditory feedback reliably induces comparable stress across conditions.
    Stress induction is assumed effective; the paper reports VAS-S increases after the math task but does not independently validate the induction (Section 4.2).
  • domain assumption The Suno API generates music that reflects the supplied prompt keywords and self-reported stress level.
    The system pipes keywords and stress level into Suno, but no manipulation check verifies that generated tracks actually differ by context or stress input (Section 3.1).
  • domain assumption Popular YouTube relaxing tracks are a fair representative baseline for manually chosen relaxing music.
    The NoAI condition uses unspecified top-rated tracks; no content matching for style, tempo, or duration is reported (Section 4.2).
  • domain assumption Four minutes of listening is sufficient to observe the stress-reduction effect.
    All listening sessions last four minutes; no dose-response or longer-exposure check is included (Section 4.2).
  • domain assumption Participants' expectations about AI music do not drive the AI-versus-NoAI difference.
    The design is unblinded and within-subject, so demand characteristics and novelty effects are not controlled (Section 4.2, Section 5.2).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Context-AI Tunes: Context-Aware AI-Generated Music for Stress Reduction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GI7TPN62

@misc{pith2026250509872,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Context-AI Tunes: Context-Aware AI-Generated Music for Stress Reduction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GI7TPN62}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.09872}
}
read the original abstract

Music plays a critical role in emotional regulation and stress relief; however, individuals often need different types of music tailored to their unique stress levels or surrounding environment. Choosing the right music can be challenging due to the overwhelming number of options and the time-consuming trial-and-error process. To address this, we propose Context-AI Tune (CAT), a system that generates personalized music based on environmental inputs and the user's self-assessed stress level. A 2x2 within-subject experiment (N=26) was conducted with two independent variables: AI (AI, NoAI) and Environment (Busy Hub, Quiet Library). CAT's effectiveness in reducing stress was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale for Stress (VAS-S). Results show that CAT is more effective than manually chosen music in reducing stress by adapting to user context.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.09872 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Main components of CAT The Context-AI Tune (CAT) system integrates a visual language model to generate personalized music tailored to users’ environments and stress levels. It comprises three main components: the AI Prompt Panel, the User Input Section, and the Music Player ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. System Workflow The CAT system features a dual-component architecture consisting of a Vue 3-based frontend and a Python Flask backend. The frontend allows users to cap￾ture real-time images using a canvas element, modify prompts, and interact with the music player. Images are encoded in Base64 format and sent to the backend for analysis. The frontend also supports live audio streams and MP3 playback, calculating pro… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Experimental session flow, repeated four times for each participant across two different days. The process includes VAS-S questionnaire, math tasks, and a post-hoc interview to assess stress and engagement levels – Participants recorded their second round of VAS-S. – Participants either listened to personalized music generated by the CAT system or to one of the most popular relaxing music tracks selected from YouTub… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: VAS-S Means by Condition (B-Hub vs Q-Lib, AI vs NoAI) As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: VAS-S Score Variation Analysis in Four Conditions increase in perceived stress from 2 to 5.5, reflecting the task’s difficulty and the influence of environmental distractions. Following the music intervention (After Music), there was a marked decrease in VAS-S scores a…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    waves push me to slumberland

    “waves push me to slumberland”: Reducing pre-sleep stress through spatio-temporal tactile displaying of music. p. 1–15. CHI ’24, New York, NY, USA (May 2024). https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642736, https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642736

    arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Baglione, A.N., Clemens, M.P., Maestre, J.F., Min, A., Dahl, L., Shih, P.C.: Understanding the technological practices and needs of music thera- pists. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5(CSCW1), 33:1–33:25 (Apr 2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3449107, https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3449107

    work page doi:10.1145/3449107 2021

  3. [3]

    In: Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence

    Bian, W., Song, Y., Gu, N., Chan, T.Y., Lo, T.T., Li, T.S., Wong, K.C., Xue, W., Trillo, R.A.: Momusic: A motion-driven human-ai collaborative music compo- sition and performing system. In: Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence. vol. 37, pp. 16057–16062 (2023)

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    In: 2021 11th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Tech- nologies (ACIT)

    Biswal, S.: I can feel you: A self-trained therapeutic music recommender system. In: 2021 11th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Tech- nologies (ACIT). pp. 753–756. IEEE (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.07600 (2018)

    Brunner, G., Konrad, A., Wang, Y., Wattenhofer, R.: Midi-vae: Modeling dynamics and instrumentation of music with applications to style transfer. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.07600 (2018)

    arXiv 2018

  6. [6]

    Cao, Y., Li, S., Liu, Y., Yan, Z., Dai, Y., Yu, P.S., Sun, L.: A comprehensive survey ofai-generatedcontent(aigc):Ahistoryofgenerativeaifromgantochatgpt(2023), https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.04226

    arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Psychological reports59(2), 827–833 (1986)

    Cella, D.F., Perry, S.W.: Reliability and concurrent validity of three visual- analogue mood scales. Psychological reports59(2), 827–833 (1986)

    work page 1986

  8. [8]

    In: 2009 Ninth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies

    Correa, A.G.D., Ficheman, I.K., do Nascimento, M., de Deus Lopes, R.: Com- puter assisted music therapy: A case study of an augmented reality musical system for children with cerebral palsy rehabilitation. In: 2009 Ninth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. pp. 218–220. IEEE (2009) Context-AI Tunes 15

    work page 2009

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 181, 103139 (2024)

    Du, X., An, P., Leung, J., Li, A., Chapman, L.E., Zhao, J.: Deepthink: Designing and probing human-ai co-creation in digital art therapy. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 181, 103139 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    In: The 34th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology

    Elkin, L.A., Kay, M., Higgins, J.J., Wobbrock, J.O.: An aligned rank transform procedure for multifactor contrast tests. In: The 34th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology. pp. 754–768 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.04643 (2020)

    Engel, J., Hantrakul, L., Gu, C., Roberts, A.: Ddsp: Differentiable digital signal processing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.04643 (2020)

    2020 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Microanalysis in music therapy: Methods, techniques and applications for clinicians, researchers, educators and students pp

    Erkkilä, J.: Music therapy toolbox (mttb): An improvisation analysis tool for clin- icians and researchers. Microanalysis in music therapy: Methods, techniques and applications for clinicians, researchers, educators and students pp. 134–148 (2007)

    2007

  5. [13]

    In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems

    Frid, E., Gomes, C., Jin, Z.: Music creation by example. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. pp. 1–13 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    The Arts in psychotherapy34(4), 309–320 (2007)

    Gilboa, A.: Testing the map: A graphic method for describing and analyzing music therapy sessions. The Arts in psychotherapy34(4), 309–320 (2007)

    2007

  7. [15]

    IEEE Access9, 129088–129101 (2021)

    Grekow, J., Dimitrova-Grekow, T.: Monophonic music generation with a given emotion using conditional variational autoencoder. IEEE Access9, 129088–129101 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction

    Hamidi, F., Kumar, S., Dorfman, M., Ojo, F., Kottapalli, M., Hurst, A.: Sensebox: A diy prototyping platform to create audio interfaces for therapy. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. pp. 25–34 (2019)

    2019

  9. [17]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.10363 (2020)

    Hanson, D., Storm, F., Huang, W., Krisciunas, V., Darrow, T., Brown, A., Lei, M., Aylett, M., Pickrell, A., et al.: Sophiapop: Experiments in human-ai collaboration on popular music. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.10363 (2020)

    2020 arXiv

  10. [18]

    ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)50(5), 1–30 (2017)

    Herremans, D., Chuan, C.H., Chew, E.: A functional taxonomy of music generation systems. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)50(5), 1–30 (2017)

    2017

  11. [19]

    In: 2022 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Electronic Technology, Communication and Information (ICETCI)

    Hou,Y.:Aimusictherapist:Astudyongeneratingspecifictherapeuticmusicbased on deep generative adversarial network approach. In: 2022 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Electronic Technology, Communication and Information (ICETCI). pp. 1277–1281. IEEE (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    In: Pro- ceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

    Hsiao, W.Y., Liu, J.Y., Yeh, Y.C., Yang, Y.H.: Compound word transformer: Learning to compose full-song music over dynamic directed hypergraphs. In: Pro- ceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. vol. 35, pp. 178–186 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.07227 (2019)

    Huang, C.Z.A., Cooijmans, T., Roberts, A., Courville, A., Eck, D.: Counterpoint by convolution. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.07227 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  14. [22]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.01374 (2021)

    Hung, H.T., Ching, J., Doh, S., Kim, N., Nam, J., Yang, Y.H.: Emopia: A multi- modal pop piano dataset for emotion recognition and emotion-based music gener- ation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.01374 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  15. [23]

    In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    Kirk, P., Grierson, M., Bodak, R., Ward, N., Brander, F., Kelly, K., Newman, N., Stewart, L.: Motivating stroke rehabilitation through music: A feasibility study using digital musical instruments in the home. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Compu...

    2016

  16. [24]

    Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment23(5), 591–603 (2013)

    Lee,J.,Thyer,B.A.:Doesmusictherapyimprovementalhealthinadults?areview. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment23(5), 591–603 (2013)

    2013

  17. [25]

    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4(CSCW2), 1–27 (2020) 16 Wei, Zhang et al

    Lee, M.H., Siewiorek, D.P., Smailagic, A., Bernardino, A., Bermúdez i Badia, S.: Co-design and evaluation of an intelligent decision support system for stroke reha- bilitation assessment. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4(CSCW2), 1–27 (2020) 16 Wei, Zhang et al

    2020

  18. [26]

    In: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in com- puting systems

    Lee, M.H., Siewiorek, D.P., Smailagic, A., Bernardino, A., Bermúdez i Badia, S.B.: A human-ai collaborative approach for clinical decision making on rehabilitation assessment. In: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in com- puting systems. pp. 1–14 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    Occupational Medicine 62(8), 600–605 (Dec 2012)

    Lesage, F.X., Berjot, S., Deschamps, F.: Clinical stress assessment using a visual analogue scale. Occupational Medicine 62(8), 600–605 (Dec 2012). https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqs140, https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqs140

    2012 doi

  20. [28]

    In: Proceedings of the 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility

    Lobo, J., Matsuda, S., Futamata, I., Sakuta, R., Suzuki, K.: Chimelight: Augment- ing instruments in interactive music therapy for children with neurodevelopmental disorders. In: Proceedings of the 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. pp....

    2019

  21. [29]

    In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems

    Louie, R., Coenen, A., Huang, C.Z., Terry, M., Cai, C.J.: Novice-ai music co- creation via ai-steering tools for deep generative models. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. pp. 1–13 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    1–4 (2018)

    Nicholls, S., Cunningham, S., Picking, R.: Collaborative artificial intelligence in musicproduction.In:ProceedingsoftheAudioMostly2018onSoundinImmersion and Emotion, pp. 1–4 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    In: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences

    Perez, P., Vallejo, E., Revuelta, M., Redondo Vega, M.V., Guervós Sánchez, E., Ruiz, J.: Immersive music therapy for elderly patients. In: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences. pp. 47–52 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    In: Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Comput- ers and Accessibility

    Ragone, G.: Designing embodied musical interaction for children with autism. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Comput- ers and Accessibility. pp. 1–4 (2020)

    2020

  25. [33]

    In: International conference on machine learning

    Roberts, A., Engel, J., Raffel, C., Hawthorne, C., Eck, D.: A hierarchical latent vector model for learning long-term structure in music. In: International conference on machine learning. pp. 4364–4373. PMLR (2018)

    2018

  26. [34]

    Recommender systems handbook pp

    Schedl, M., Knees, P., McFee, B., Bogdanov, D., Kaminskas, M.: Music recom- mender systems. Recommender systems handbook pp. 453–492 (2015)

    2015

  27. [35]

    Nature Machine Intelligence5(1), 46–57 (2023)

    Sharma, A., Lin, I.W., Miner, A.S., Atkins, D.C., Althoff, T.: Human–ai collabora- tion enables more empathic conversations in text-based peer-to-peer mental health support. Nature Machine Intelligence5(1), 46–57 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    Suno: Suno: Ai-powered music generation (2024), https://suno.com, accessed: [Jan 2025]

    2024

  29. [37]

    (2003), https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:63714877

    Verity, A.: A computer aided music therapy analysis system : Camtas. (2003), https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:63714877

    2003

  30. [38]

    American Psychological Association, Washington (2017)

    Watson, J.C., Greenberg, L.S.: Emotion-focused Therapy for General- ized Anxiety. American Psychological Association, Washington (2017). https://doi.org/10.1037/0000018-000, https://content.apa.org/books/15988- 000

    2017 doi

  31. [39]

    Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence3, 497864 (2020)

    Williams, D., Hodge, V.J., Wu, C.Y.: On the use of ai for generation of functional music to improve mental health. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence3, 497864 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems

    Wobbrock,J.O.,Findlater,L.,Gergle,D.,Higgins,J.J.:Thealignedranktransform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only anova procedures. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. pp. 143–146 (2011)

    2011

  33. [41]

    Encyclopedia of Biostatistics8 (2005)

    Woolson, R.F.: Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Encyclopedia of Biostatistics8 (2005)

    2005

  34. [42]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.11954 (2023) Context-AI Tunes 17

    Yu, D., Song, K., Lu, P., He, T., Tan, X., Ye, W., Zhang, S., Bian, J.: Musicagent: An ai agent for music understanding and generation with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.11954 (2023) Context-AI Tunes 17

    2023 arXiv

  35. [43]

    In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence for Medicine Sciences

    Yuan, M., Zhong, Z., He, Y.: Application and innovation of five elements music therapy in the era of artificial intelligence. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence for Medicine Sciences. pp. 132–136 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics29(4), 1937–1950 (2021)

    Zhu, H.Y., Chen, H.T., Lin, C.T.: The effects of virtual and physical elevation on physiological stress during virtual reality height exposure. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics29(4), 1937–1950 (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    Plos one19(4), e0301052 (2024)

    Zhu,H.Y.,Chen,H.T.,Lin,C.T.:Understandingtheeffectsofstressonthep300re- sponse during naturalistic simulation of heights exposure. Plos one19(4), e0301052 (2024)

    2024

  38. [46]

    In: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    Zhu, H.Y., Magsino, E.M., Hamim, S.M., Lin, C.T., Chen, H.T.: A drone nearly hit me! a reflection on the human factors of drone collisions. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 1–6 (2021)

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.