Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 38 references

On almost periodic solutions to NLS without external parameters

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that one-dimensional nonlinear Schrödinger equations on the circle admit infinite-dimensional non-resonant invariant tori without external parameters, and hence almost periodic solutions that are not quasi-periodic.

desk verdict A clear, honest extended sketch of a major result, but it is not the proof—the theorem lives in the companion BGR24 paper, and the sketch leaves an unverified gap between its stated smoothing estimate and the sparsity condition. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.10051 v1 pith:PCG7WZSI submitted 2025-05-15 math.AP math.DS

classification math.APmath.DS MSC 35B1535Q5537K55
keywords infinitedimensionaltoriKAMtheoryregularizingnormalformalmostperiodicsolutionsnonlinearSchrödingerequationnon-resonantKroneckerinternalparameterssparsitycondition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This note claims that the nonlinear Schrödinger equation on the circle, with a real entire nonlinearity whose cubic term is present and no external forcing or potential, has infinite-dimensional non-resonant invariant tori, and therefore almost periodic solutions that are not quasi-periodic. The proof strategy is iterative: instead of constructing the infinite-dimensional torus in one step, it builds a convergent sequence of finite-dimensional KAM tori, each obtained from the previous one by opening a new Fourier mode and using the mode's squared amplitude as an internal parameter. The key input is a regularizing normal form that makes the nonlinearity gain one derivative up to an $L^2$-norm phase factor, which is what allows the frequencies to be twisted in the limit of infinitely many modes. This is the first such construction for a non-integrable Hamiltonian PDE with no external parameter.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the regularizing normal form of Section 2, used as a black box in Section 3. After a symplectic change of variables, the Hamiltonian is $\mathrm{Z}_2$ plus a remainder whose coefficients obey $|P^{\ell,\sigma}| \lesssim 1 \wedge (|\ell^*_3|^2/|\ell^*_1|)$ (equation (7) with $\delta=1$), which makes the vector field one-derivative smoothing except for an $L^2$-norm phase rotation, a gauge transform. This smoothing is what upgrades the KAM twist condition to the diagonal-dominance form (18) and yields the sparsity condition (20) on the infinite mode set $S_\infty$. Around this, the proof builds a loop: open one new site, run a normal-form procedure to shrink the adapted jet to $r_p^{4000}$, then run a KAM step with the current radius as the small parameter; because $r_{p+1}$ can be chosen much smaller than $r_p$, the loop has an infinite reservoir of smallness.

What would settle it

Compute, for cubic NLS, the terms generated by the normal form at order eight and check the claimed bound $|P^{\ell,\sigma}| \lesssim 1 \wedge (|\ell^*_3|^2/|\ell^*_1|)$ on every monomial whose highest mode is paired as an action; a single monomial whose coefficient stays of order one while $|\ell^*_1|$ grows would falsify the smoothing estimate that the KAM part uses as a black box.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is Theorem 1.2: there exist non-resonant infinite-dimensional Kronecker tori for (NLS), meaning invariant sets homeomorphic to $\mathbb{T}^{\mathbb{N}}$ on which the flow is conjugate to translation by a rationally independent frequency vector, with every orbit dense. By Corollary 1.5 these tori support almost periodic solutions that are not quasi-periodic. The construction actually produces a family of such tori accumulating on the finite-dimensional KAM tori of [KP96]: one fixes a finite set of modes, builds a torus around it, then repeatedly adds one mode, applies a normal-form step that drives the unwanted low-order terms down to size $r_p^{4000}$, and performs a KAM step whose small parameter is the current radius $r_p$ rather than the global amplitude. The limit $p\to\infty$ is controlled by a sparsity condition on the final set of modes, and the whole scheme works only because the regularized nonlinearity is strong enough to keep the twist map invertible as the dimension grows.

Load-bearing premise

The proof assumes that after a carefully chosen change of variables the nonlinearity really does gain one derivative, except for an irrelevant phase rotation, with bounds that do not degrade as the mode numbers grow; if that fails, the sparsity condition cannot save the iteration.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The NLS on the circle has global solutions that are almost periodic but not quasi-periodic, for every nonlinearity satisfying the paper's assumptions: real entire, $f(0)=0$, $f'(0)\neq0$, and at most exponential growth.
  • The constructed tori form a family that accumulates on the finite-dimensional KAM tori of [KP96], so the almost periodic solutions occur arbitrarily close to known finite-dimensional invariant tori.
  • Each non-resonant Kronecker torus carries dense orbits, so the corresponding solutions are ergodic on the torus with respect to the product measure.
  • The proof uses only internal parameters, namely squared moduli of Fourier coefficients, so no external potential or forcing term is needed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next test is whether the sparsity condition (20) is genuinely necessary; the discussion in the note suggests that a regularizing normal form with better smoothing (larger $\delta$, or no loss $s_0=0$) would relax it, and the sixth-order term $Z_6$ is the obvious place to look.
  • The same 'add one mode at a time' iteration should transfer to other one-dimensional Hamiltonian PDEs once an analogue of the regularizing normal form is available; this is a direct test of the method's generality.
  • A quantitative version that controls the decay of the radii $r_p$ rather than just choosing them successively smaller would make the tori concrete and could connect the construction to long-time stability theorems.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript states Theorem 1.2, which asserts the existence of non-resonant infinite-dimensional Kronecker tori for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation on the circle without external parameters, and Corollary 1.5, which asserts the existence of almost-periodic solutions that are not quasi-periodic. The proof is presented as an extended sketch: Section 2 describes a partially regularizing normal form whose coefficients depend on the L2 norm, and Section 3 outlines a KAM-type construction using internal parameters, iterating finite-dimensional tori in the style of Pöschel. The text repeatedly states that detailed arguments are contained in the companion paper [BGR24], and several steps are explicitly announced as omitted or simplified.

Significance. If the result holds, it is a significant advance: it would provide the first construction of infinite-dimensional invariant tori for a non-integrable Hamiltonian PDE without external parameters, and equivalently almost-periodic non-quasi-periodic solutions for the 1D NLS. The proposed mechanism—iterating finite-dimensional KAM tori while using internal parameters and a partially regularizing normal form—is novel and goes beyond the previously known external-parameter results. The paper also gives a clear and useful survey of the literature. However, as submitted, the manuscript is a proof sketch rather than a complete proof, and the central claim depends on the companion paper [BGR24] plus several admitted omissions. The significance of the result therefore cannot be evaluated from this manuscript alone.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3, especially §3.6] Theorem 1.2 is not proved in the manuscript. The text repeatedly states that detailed proofs are contained in [BGR24] (e.g., §1, §2.2, §3.3, §3.7), and the convergence step in §3.6 is described only as "very schematically" using an "infinite reservoir of smallness." The reader is not given a proof of the KAM steps, the measure estimates, or the limit p→∞. As a standalone paper, this is a load-bearing omission. The authors should either include the complete proof or precise theorem-by-theorem reductions to [BGR24], or clearly re-frame the paper as an extended abstract of [BGR24] rather than as a proof of Theorem 1.2.
  2. [§3.7 and §2] The regularizing normal form bound (7) is not reconciled with the derivative estimate (19) used for the twist condition. Section 2 states the coefficient bound |P^{ℓ,σ}| ≲ 1 ∧ |ℓ*_3|^{2δ}/|ℓ*_1|^δ with δ=1 for the normal form after a symplectic change and a gauge transform, while §3.7 asserts "our case with s0=2δ=2" and uses estimate (19). The derivation of (19) from (7) is not given and is delegated to [BGR24]. This is load-bearing because (18)–(20) are exactly what allow the limit p→∞ in §3.6. Moreover, the heuristic discussion in §3.7 for the sextic term c_{k,ℓ,j}|u_j|^2|u_ℓ|^2|u_k|^2 suggests a bound |c_{k,ℓ,j}| ≤ ⟨k⟩^{-δ}⟨ℓ⟩^{4δ}⟨j⟩^{4δ}, which for k≫ℓ≥j appears weaker than the 1-smoothing bound in (7), so the stated loss s0=2δ=2 is not evidently consistent with (7).
  3. [§3.1] The L2 norm is treated as a constant in the KAM part, but Section 2 builds the normal form with coefficients depending on ‖u‖^2_{L2}, and §3.7 attributes the loss s0=2 to this dependence. The text says "to simplify our presentation, in this sketch of proof we'll consider ‖u‖^2_{L2} as a constant." This simplification affects the frequency modulation in (17) and the twist condition in (18), since the internal parameters ξ enter both through the amplitudes and through the L2-norm argument of the coefficients. The admitted simplification is therefore load-bearing and must be either removed or fully justified.
  4. [§3.7] The twist condition is only stated for differentiable λ, but the text explicitly notes: "in fact ξ ↦ λ will be only Lipschitz and we have to adapt the twist condition but we omit this problem here." Since the twist condition (18) and the sparsity condition (20) are essential for taking p→∞, the Lipschitz adaptation must be supplied or precisely referenced. As written, the proof of the twist condition is incomplete.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2 and §3.7] The symbol s0 is used with two different meanings: in §2 it denotes a Sobolev regularity exponent in (1/2, s), while in §3.7 it denotes the weight exponent in the ℓ^1_{s0} spaces, where s0=2. Please introduce distinct notation to avoid confusion.
  2. [§2.3 and §3.7] The sextic integrable term is written as Z6 = ∑_{k≠ℓ} |u_k|^2|u_ℓ|^4/(k−ℓ)^2 in §2.3 and as Z6 = ∑_{k≠ℓ} |u_k|^4|u_ℓ|^2/(k−ℓ)^2 in §3.7. Although the sums are symmetric under exchange of k and ℓ, the notation should be made consistent to avoid confusion.
  3. [§3.4] The sentence "we will ignore it" refers to removing a small part of parameters during the Birkhoff step. If this removal is not described, the measure estimate for O^{(2)}_ε stated in §3.5 has no visible justification in the note; a precise reference or a brief explanation should be added.
  4. [Throughout] There are several typographical issues, including "extern al" in the abstract, "withδ = 1" after (7), and inconsistent spacing in displayed formulas. A careful proofreading pass is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the note transparently defers the full proof to the self-cited companion paper and contains no fitted-input prediction.

full rationale

The paper does not fit parameters to data and then present them as predictions; the internal parameters ξ are construction variables (Section 3.2), and the frequencies are defined from them, not fitted. The central result is stated as established in [BGR24], and the note explicitly labels itself an extended sketch; Section 2's regularizing normal form is used as a black box, with the full derivation delegated to [BGR24]. This is a transparent division of labor rather than a definitional identification of the conclusion with an assumption. The twist bound (19) and sparsity condition (20) are asserted as consequences of the sketched KAM analysis, and the note flags omitted technicalities ('we omit this problem here'; 'to simplify our presentation, in this sketch of proof we'll consider ‖u‖²_L2 as a constant'). Whether (19) actually follows from the stated smoothing bound (7), and whether the s0=2δ=2 loss is consistent with the δ=1 smoothing of Section 2, is a correctness/completeness question about the sketch, not a circular reduction: the paper does not define its conclusion into its hypotheses, and the self-citation is not used to forbid alternatives. Hence no step reduces by construction to an earlier input or to the theorem being proved.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The proof introduces a large-scale KAM machine with many free smallness parameters (ε, r_p, ν) and relies on an external regularizing normal form from the authors' companion paper. No new physical entities (forces, particles, dimensions) are introduced. The main free parameters are the recursively chosen radii and the scaling constant, which are construction choices rather than fitted values.

free parameters (3)
  • radii sequence (r_p)_{p>=1} = Not specified; chosen recursively with r_{p+1} << r_p
    The proof uses an 'infinite reservoir of smallness' (Section 3.6) and explicitly says it relinquishes reasonable control over the decay of r_p. The radii are construction parameters, not physical inputs, but the theorem's proof depends on their existence with no quantitative control.
  • small parameter ε = Arbitrarily small; constraints like ε ≲ r_1^{5000}
    ε is introduced by scaling (Section 3.1) and must be extremely small to absorb the r_1^{4000} denominators in the first KAM step. It is an internal smallness parameter, not fitted to data.
  • exponent ν ∈ (1/2,1) = Fixed, e.g., ν=3/4
    Used to define the parameter scale r^{2ν}. The proof requires ν > 1/2 to compensate small divisors with powers of r when a+ā ≥ 10000 (Section 3.4). The specific value is not important, only the inequality.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Standard Kuksin-Pöschel KAM theory for finite-dimensional tori
    Invoked as 'the same way' in Section 3.3 to construct finite-dimensional tori before the iterative addition of sites.
  • domain assumption Regularizing normal form theorem from [BGR24]
    Used as a black box in Section 3.1; the note only sketches the proof in Section 2 and refers to [BGR24] for the full statement. This is the main external input on which the KAM scheme rests.
  • domain assumption Melnikov-type small divisor estimates (orders 1 to 4) hold on sets of asymptotically full measure
    Stated in Section 3.3 with arguments 'similar to [BG22]' and 'we prove that they are typically satisfied'. Full proofs are not included in this note.
  • ad hoc to paper The L2 norm is treated as a constant in the KAM part
    In Section 3.1 the authors say 'to simplify our presentation, in this sketch of proof we'll consider ||u||²_{L²} as a constant'. This suppresses a dependence of the Hamiltonian on internal parameters; they assert it does not seriously affect the scheme, but the rigorous handling is not shown here.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On almost periodic solutions to NLS without external parameters." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PCG7WZSI

@misc{pith2026250510051,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On almost periodic solutions to NLS without external parameters},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PCG7WZSI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.10051}
}
read the original abstract

In this note, we present a result established in [BGR24] where we prove that nonlinear Schrodinger equations on the circle, without external parameters, admit plenty of infinite dimensional non resonant invariant tori, or equivalently, plenty of almost periodic solutions. Our aim is to propose an extended sketch of the proof, emphasizing the new points which have enabled us to achieve this result.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 4 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Baldi, M

    P. Baldi, M. Berti, E. Haus, R. Montalto , Time quasi-periodic gravity water waves in finite depth, Inventiones Math https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-018-0812-2. 214 (2018), 739--911

  2. [2]

    Bernier, N

    J. Bernier, N. Camps , Long time stability for cubic nonlinear Schr\" odinger equations on non-rectangular flat tori, arXiv:2402.04122 https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.04122, (2024)

  3. [3]

    Bernier, E

    J. Bernier, E. Faou, B. Gr\'ebert , Rational normal forms and stability of small solutions to nonlinear Schr\"odinger equations, Annals of PDE https://doi.org/10.1007/s40818-020-00089-5 6 , 14 (2020)

  4. [4]

    Bernier, B

    J. Bernier, B. Gr\'ebert , Long time dynamics for generalized Korteweg-de Vries and Benjamin-Ono equations, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-021-01666-z 241, 1139--1241 (2021)

  5. [5]

    Bernier, B

    J. Bernier, B. Gr\'ebert , Birkhoff normal forms for Hamiltonian PDEs in their energy space, Journal de l’Ecole polytechnique — Mathématiques https://doi.org/10.5802/jep.193, Tome 9 (2022), pp. 681-745

  6. [6]

    Bernier, B

    J. Bernier, B. Gr \'e bert, T. Robert , Infinite dimensional invariant tori for nonlinear Schr\"odinger equations, arxiv.org/abs/2412.11845 https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.11845, (2024)

  7. [7]

    Berti, P

    M. Berti, P. Bolle , Quasi-periodic solutions with Sobolev regularity of NLS on T^d with a multiplicative potential, J. Eur. Math. Soc. https://doi.org/10.4171/JEMS/361 15 (2013), 229--286

  8. [8]

    Berti, Z

    M. Berti, Z. Hassainia, N. Masmoudi , Time quasi-periodic vortex patches of Euler equation in the plane, Inventiones Math. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-023-01195-4, 233 (2023), 1279--1391

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    Berti, T

    M. Berti, T. Kappeler, R. Montalto , Large KAM tori for perturbations of the dNLS equation, Asterisque https://doi.org/10.24033/ast.1053, 403. 2018

  2. [10]

    Biasco, L

    L. Biasco, L. Corsi, G. Gentile, M. Procesi , Asymptically full measure sets of almost-periodic solutions for the NLS equation, arxiv:2412.02648 https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.02648

  3. [11]

    Biasco, J.E

    L. Biasco, J.E. Massetti, M. Procesi , Almost periodic invariant tori for the NLS on the circle, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar\'e C Anal. Non Lin\'eaire https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anihpc.2020.09.003, 38 (2020) no. 3, 711--758

  4. [12]

    Biasco, J.E

    L. Biasco, J.E. Massetti, M. Procesi , Weak Sobolev almost periodic solutions for the 1D NLS, Duke Math. J. https://doi.org/10.1215/00127094-2022-0089, 172 (14) 2643 - 2714, 2023

  5. [13]

    Bohr , Almost Periodic Functions, Chelsea Publishing Co., New York, 1947

    H. Bohr , Almost Periodic Functions, Chelsea Publishing Co., New York, 1947

  6. [14]

    Bourgain , Construction of quasi-periodic solutions for Hamiltonian perturbations of linear equations and applications to nonlinear PDE, Internat

    J. Bourgain , Construction of quasi-periodic solutions for Hamiltonian perturbations of linear equations and applications to nonlinear PDE, Internat. Math. Res. Notice https://doi.org/10.1155/S1073792894000516 1994 (1994), no. 11, 475--497

  7. [15]

    J. Bourgain , Construction of approximative and almost-periodic solutions of perturbed linear Schr\"odinger and wave equations, Geometric and Functional Analysis https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02247885 6 (1996) 201--230

  8. [16]

    Bourgain , Quasi-periodic solutions of H amiltonian perturbations of 2 D linear S chr\"odinger equations , Ann

    J. Bourgain , Quasi-periodic solutions of H amiltonian perturbations of 2 D linear S chr\"odinger equations , Ann. of Math. https://doi.org/10.2307/121001 (2), 148 (1998), no. 2, 363--439

  9. [17]

    Bourgain , On diffusion in high-dimensional Hamiltonian systems and PDE, J

    J. Bourgain , On diffusion in high-dimensional Hamiltonian systems and PDE, J. Anal. Math. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02791532 80, 1--35 (2000)

  10. [18]

    Bourgain , On invariant tori of full dimension for 1 D periodic NLS , J

    J. Bourgain , On invariant tori of full dimension for 1 D periodic NLS , J. Funct. Anal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2004.10.019 229 (2005), no. 1, 62--94

  11. [19]

    Cong , The existence of full dimensional KAM tori for nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation, Math

    H. Cong , The existence of full dimensional KAM tori for nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation, Math. Ann. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-023-02782-9 Volume 390, pages 671–719, (2024)

  12. [20]

    H. Cong, X. Yuan , The existence of full dimensional invariant tori for 1-dimensional nonlinear wave equation, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar\'e C Anal. Non Lin\'eaire https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anihpc.2020.09.006 38 (2021), no.3, 759--786

  13. [21]

    Corsi, G

    L. Corsi, G. Gentile, M. Procesi , Almost-periodic solutions to the NLS equation with smooth convolution potentials, arXiv:2309.14276 https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.14276, (2023)

  14. [22]

    Craig, C.E

    W. Craig, C.E. Wayne , Newton's method and periodic solutions of nonlinear wave equation, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160461102 46 (1993), no. 11, 1409--1498

  15. [23]

    Eliasson, S.B

    L.H. Eliasson, S.B. Kuksin , KAM for the nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation, Ann. Math. https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2010.172.371 (2) 172 (2010), 371--435

  16. [24]

    Eliasson, B

    L.H. Eliasson, B. Gr\'ebert, S.B. Kuksin , KAM for non-linear beam equation, Geom. Funct. Anal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00039-016-0390-7 26 (2016) 1588--1715

  17. [25]

    Erdo gan, N

    M.B. Erdo gan, N. Tzirakis, Talbot effect for the cubic nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation on the torus, Math. Res. Lett. https://dx.doi.org/10.4310/MRL.2013.v20.n6.a7, 20 (2013), 1081–1090

  18. [26]

    Erdo gan, N

    M.B. Erdo gan, N. Tzirakis Smoothing and global attractors for the Zakharov system on the torus, Anal. PDE https://doi.org/10.2140/apde.2013.6.723, 6 (2013), pp. 723--750

  19. [27]

    Feola, F

    R. Feola, F. Giuliani , Quasi-periodic traveling waves on an infinitely deep perfect fluid under gravity, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society https://doi.org/10.1090/memo/1471, 158 p. (2024)

  20. [28]

    J. Geng, X. Xu , Almost-periodic solutions of one dimensional Schr\"odinger equation with the external parameters, J. Dyn. Differ. Equations https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-013-9302-9 25 (2013), no. 2, 435--450

  21. [29]

    Gr\'ebert, E

    B. Gr\'ebert, E. Paturel , KAM for the Klein Gordon equation on S^d , Boll. Unione Mat. Ital https://doi.org/10.1007/s40574-016-0072-2, 9 (2016), 237--288

  22. [30]

    Kappeler, J

    T. Kappeler, J. P \"o schel , KdV&KAM, Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-08054-2 (2003)

  23. [31]

    Kuksin , Hamiltonian perturbations of infinite-dimensional linear systems with imaginary spectrum, Funktsional

    S. Kuksin , Hamiltonian perturbations of infinite-dimensional linear systems with imaginary spectrum, Funktsional. Anal. i Prilozhen. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02577134 21 (1987), no. 3, 22--37

  24. [32]

    o schel , Invariant C antor manifolds of quasi-periodic oscillations for a nonlinear S chr \

    S. Kuksin, J. P \"o schel , Invariant C antor manifolds of quasi-periodic oscillations for a nonlinear S chr \"o dinger equation , Ann. of Math. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118656 (2) 143 (1996), no. 1, 149--179

  25. [33]

    J. Liu, D. Xiang , Exact global control of small divisors in rational normal form, Nonlinearity https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6544/ad4cd2, 37 075020

  26. [34]

    McConnell , Nonlinear smoothing for the periodic generalized nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation, J

    R. McConnell , Nonlinear smoothing for the periodic generalized nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation, J. Differential Equations https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2022.09.017, 341 (2022), 353–379

  27. [35]

    P\"oschel , A KAM theorem for some nonlinear PDEs, Ann

    J. P\"oschel , A KAM theorem for some nonlinear PDEs, Ann. Sc. Norm. Pisa Cl. Sci. http://www.numdam.org/item/ASNSP_1996_4_23_1_119_0(4) 23 (1996), no. 1, 119--148

  28. [36]

    o schel , On the construction of almost-periodic solutions for a nonlinear Schr \

    J. P \"o schel , On the construction of almost-periodic solutions for a nonlinear Schr \"o dinger equation , Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143385702001086 22 (2002), no. 5, 1537--1549

  29. [37]

    Procesi, M

    C. Procesi, M. Procesi , A KAM algorithm for the resonant non-linear Schr\"odinger equation, Advances in Math. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2014.12.004 (2015), 399--470

  30. [38]

    Wayne , Periodic and quasi-periodic solutions of nonlinear wave equations via KAM theory, Comm

    C.E. Wayne , Periodic and quasi-periodic solutions of nonlinear wave equations via KAM theory, Comm. Math. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02104499 127 (1990), no. 3, 479--528

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.