Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 106 references

Toward Near-Space Communication Network in the 6G and Beyond Era

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that near-space networks of stratospheric balloons, solar UAVs, and airships are an indispensable 6G layer, bridging satellites and ground with wide coverage, long endurance, and low latency.

desk verdict A genuinely useful survey of near-space communications for 6G, but the central case rests on endurance and availability numbers that the paper itself contradicts. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.12379 v1 pith:KVJD7QZX submitted 2025-05-18 eess.SP

Xinhua Liu , Zhen Gao , Ziwei Wan , Zhonghuai Wu , Tuan Li , Tianqi Mao , Xiao Liang , Dezhi Zheng
show 1 more author
Jun Zhang
This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.SP
keywords near-spacecommunications6Gnetworkshigh-altitudeplatformstationsspace-air-ground-seaintegratednetworksolar-poweredUAVstratosphericairshiptopologydesignAI-enabledresourcemanagement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is a review that tries to establish that near-space communication networks (NS-ComNet), platforms flying 20–100 km above Earth, deserve a central place in sixth-generation (6G) networks and in the space-air-ground-sea integrated network (SAGSIN). It argues that these platforms combine the wide-area coverage of satellites with the deployment flexibility of low-altitude UAVs, while avoiding satellite latency and cost and UAV endurance limits. The review assembles the case from three platform families—high-altitude balloons, solar-powered UAVs, and stratospheric airships—and maps the technical work needed to make them practical: topology design, resource and handover management, joint optimization, and AI-enabled operation. A sympathetic reader would care because, if the case holds, NS-ComNet fills the coverage-cost-latency gap that neither satellites nor drones can close on their own.

What carries the argument

The central object is the near-space platform (NSP), also called a high-altitude platform station (HAPS), deployed in a layered heterogeneous network between the space layer and the air/ground layers. The paper's machinery is the hierarchical architecture itself plus the enabling-technology stack: topology design to place NSPs for coverage, resource optimization and dynamic spectrum sharing for efficiency, prediction-based handover management for the quasi-stationary but drifting platforms, multi-objective joint optimization for coverage-capacity-latency trade-offs, and machine-learning and AI methods, including federated learning with NSPs as parameter servers, to make the system adapt to a dynamic multi-sphere environment.

What would settle it

A year-long operational trial of a representative solar-powered stratospheric platform carrying a 5G/6G payload, logging the fraction of time it stays inside a defined station-keeping box of about 10 km radius, together with a cost-per-covered-user-month comparison against a LEO satellite constellation, would settle whether the central endurance and cost claims hold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that NS-ComNet is not a niche adjunct but an indispensable component of the 6G and beyond architecture. Positioned in the 20–100 km near-space region, a single platform with an extra-large antenna array can serve a continuous area hundreds of kilometers in diameter, use top-down propagation to penetrate urban canyons, and combine THz bands, reconfigurable intelligent surfaces, 3D beamforming, and dynamic spectrum sharing to approach the 6G target of Tbps per square kilometer traffic density. Solar-powered station-keeping with more than 99% annual hover time is presented as the basis for lower operating cost than satellites, while coverage radius and endurance far exceed those of low-altitude UAVs. The paper accordingly frames NSPs as critical relay nodes that integrate satellite, UAV, and terrestrial networks into a hierarchical SAGSIN, and treats AI-driven optimization as the key to managing the resulting dynamic topology, interference, and handover complexity.

Load-bearing premise

The whole comparative case rests on the assumption, asserted rather than demonstrated, that near-space platforms can keep station for months to years with more than 99% annual hover time at a cost below satellites; if actual endurance, reliability, or cost falls short, the claimed advantage over satellite and UAV layers weakens.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If NS-ComNet is integrated into 6G, coverage can extend to oceans, remote land, and disaster zones without depending only on satellite backhaul or terrestrial infrastructure.
  • Single-platform service areas of hundreds of kilometers in diameter would make seamless wide-area connectivity possible with far fewer handovers than low-altitude UAV swarms.
  • NSPs acting as relays between LEO satellites and ground terminals can shorten propagation paths, easing the latency and power limits that constrain direct satellite access.
  • THz and free-space optical links combined on NSP backhaul could deliver hundreds of Gbps to Tbps inter-platform and platform-to-ground transport in the low-turbulence stratosphere.
  • AI-enabled resource and handover management is presented as the practical route to operating these dynamic topologies, with federated learning accelerated by NSP relays rather than by satellites alone.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • I read the platform evidence as the paper's softest layer: several flagship programs cited for endurance are discontinued or unverified, so the months-to-years station-keeping claim is an assumption to test rather than an established fact.
  • If the endurance and cost assumptions hold, the same NSP layer could serve non-communication roles such as navigation augmentation, remote sensing, and computing hubs, since the paper itself sketches communication-navigation-sensing-computing integration.
  • A natural testable extension is to benchmark an NSP relay against a LEO satellite constellation for a specific service such as IoT backhaul in remote areas, using year-long cost and latency data rather than coverage simulations alone.
  • The transformer-based unified physical-layer model discussed for NSPs could be validated on recorded near-space channel data before relying on it for semantic communication.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper is a survey of near-space communication networks (NS-ComNet) as an envisioned component of 6G and the space-air-ground-sea integrated network (SAGSIN). It argues that NS-ComNet uniquely fills the gap between satellite and terrestrial layers through wide-area coverage, long-endurance high-altitude operation, and flexible deployment. The paper reviews platform developments (high-altitude balloons, solar-powered UAVs, stratospheric airships), identifies challenges (multi-sphere environment dynamics, energy limitations, multi-layer network complexity, interference and resource management), and surveys key enabling technologies including topology design, resource optimization, handover management, multi-objective joint optimization, and AI-based techniques. It concludes with future directions such as SDN/NFV orchestration, edge computing, massive MIMO, THz-optical convergence, quantum-classical security, direct NSP-to-device communications, and semantic communication. The review is organized broadly and aims to provide a research foundation for NS-ComNet in 6G and beyond.

Significance. The paper provides a useful organizational framework and a current snapshot of the literature on NS-ComNet, especially its taxonomy of platform types, challenges, and AI-enabled solutions. If its central feasibility claims were supported, the survey would be a valuable reference for researchers entering this area. However, the paper's core motivational premise—that near-space platforms can sustain multi-month to multi-year station-keeping with more than 99% annual hover time—is asserted as fact but is not supported by the evidence the paper itself cites. Several quantitative claims (hundreds-of-km coverage, Tbps/km2 traffic density) appear without derivation or citation. The review is therefore most useful as a roadmap of open problems, but in its current form it overstates the maturity of near-space platform capabilities and should be revised to distinguish demonstrated performance from aspirational targets.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sections I.A, II and Table I] The central claim of the paper rests on the assertion that NSPs achieve 'more than 99% of annual hover time' (Section I.A) and 'continuous operation at near-space altitudes for months to years' (Section II). The platform evidence summarized in Table I and Sections II.A–II.C does not support this claim. Loon was a free-floating balloon that achieved 312 days of flight, but this was not station-keeping, and the project was discontinued in 2021; Elevate provides only 24-hour flights; Jimu-1 is a tethered aerostat at 9.05 km, below the 20–100 km near-space band; Yuanmeng's endurance is internally inconsistent (Section II.C states a 48-hour flight, while Table I states 48 days); Zephyr S has demonstrated 25 days of stratospheric navigation despite the text's 100-day indicator; Stratobus and SkyNet are design targets or terminated programs; and BH-HAPs' 'months' endurance is unverified. The paper should explicitly separate demonstrated performance from projected targets and add quantitative uncertainty or caveats to the endurance and availability figures, since these are load-bearing for the claimed advantages over satellites and low-altitude UAVs.
  2. [Section III.B] Section III.B itself documents severe energy-system limitations: gallium-arsenide cells achieve only 18–22% conversion efficiency in the stratosphere, and lithium-sulfur batteries suffer over 40% capacity degradation at low temperatures. These constraints are inconsistent with the 'continuous operation for months to years' and '99% of annual hover time' statements made in Sections I.A and II. The authors should either reconcile these sections by explaining how the endurance figures are achieved despite the stated energy limitations, or explicitly frame the endurance figures as open challenges and future targets. As written, the paper makes internally inconsistent statements about platform readiness.
  3. [Section I.A] The paper asserts that 'a single NSP equipped with an extra-large-scale antenna array can establish a continuous service area with a diameter of hundreds of kilometers' and that the system can satisfy the '6G technical requirement for traffic density at the Tbps/km2 level.' No supporting citation, link-budget calculation, or error analysis is provided for these quantitative claims. If they are taken from prior studies, the appropriate references should be given; otherwise, the claims should be tempered or explicitly labeled as idealistic projections.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section II.C and Table I] The Yuanmeng airship endurance is given as '48-hour flight' in Section II.C and '48 days' in Table I; these conflicting values must be reconciled with the cited source.
  2. [Section II.B] For Zephyr S, the '100 consecutive flight days' is described as a technical indicator, but the demonstrated record is stated as 25 days; the text should clearly mark the 100-day figure as a design goal rather than a demonstrated capability.
  3. [Table I] Jimu-1 is listed as a high-altitude balloon, but it is a tethered aerostat that reached only 9.05 km, below the 20–100 km near-space altitude range used elsewhere in the paper; its inclusion should be justified or its altitude range clarified.
  4. [References] References [39] and [41] are identical (Kang et al., Remote Sens., vol. 16, no. 10, May 2024), and references [19] and [36] appear to describe the same paper by d'Oliveira et al.; duplicate entries should be consolidated.
  5. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors, including 'satiefies' in Section I.A, 'physcial-layer' in Section V.G, 'consistes' in Table I, inconsistent spacing in 'UA V', and a duplicated '[Online].' in reference [29]; these should be corrected.
  6. [Section III.A] The discussion of multi-sphere environment dynamics, while interesting, is only loosely connected to communication challenges; consider focusing this subsection on the communication-relevant consequences of the near-space environment.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: this review compiles external work, and the endurance premise is an evidence gap rather than a circular derivation.

full rationale

This paper is a survey and position review, not a derivation. It contains no fitted parameters, no prediction equations, and no uniqueness theorem, so there is no construction by which an output is identical to an input. The central claim that NS-ComNet is an indispensable SAGSIN layer rests on asserted platform capabilities, such as the 'more than 99% of annual hover time' statement in Section I.A, and on the project compendium in Table I. Those assertions are contestable: Section III.B itself documents gallium arsenide efficiencies of only 18-22% and lithium-sulfur capacity loss over 40%, which undercuts the year-round station-keeping premise, and Table I's longest controlled stratospheric station-keeping is 48 days rather than months to years. However, an unsupported or internally inconsistent factual premise is a correctness and evidence risk, not circularity. The paper does contain many self-citations, and one instance is notable: ref. [15], a beamforming paper by co-author Z. Gao, is cited for the statement that the near-space region provides 'a physical environment for long-duration aerial operations,' so that citation does not supply independent support for the endurance premise. Even so, no step of the paper's reasoning reduces to a self-citation chain or to a definitional equivalence. The surveyed technical results on coverage optimization, handover, mMIMO, THz/FSO, and semantic communications are drawn from the broader literature and are not used to prove the endurance premise. The self-citations are dense but essentially bibliographic support for enabling-technology discussions, not the load-bearing derivation of the paper's central claim. Therefore no significant circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review introduces no free parameters, fitted values, or invented physical entities. It relies on accepted ITU targets, on reported (but not universally verified) platform capabilities, and on the projected feasibility of advanced technologies under NSP constraints.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The ITU-R 6G performance targets (1 Tbps peak rate, 0.1 ms latency, Tbps/km2 traffic density) are taken as the requirements NS-ComNet must meet.
    Section I.A and Fig. 1 reference ITU-R M.2160 and use Tbps/km2 as a design driver; if these targets are revised, the motivation for NS-ComNet's capacity claims changes.
  • domain assumption Near-space platforms can achieve months-to-years endurance with high station-keeping reliability (e.g., over 99% annual hover time).
    Section II asserts these capabilities based on project reports (Loon, Zephyr S, Stratobus), but not all platform types have demonstrated them; the review's 'wide-area persistent hovering' advantage depends on this.
  • domain assumption Enabling technologies such as massive MIMO, THz/FSO links, and AI can be integrated on NSPs within strict payload, power, and environmental limits.
    Sections IV and V treat these as feasible directions, while Section III.D and V.C acknowledge hardware and control constraints, indicating integration is an open problem rather than an established fact.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Toward Near-Space Communication Network in the 6G and Beyond Era." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KVJD7QZX

@misc{pith2026250512379,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Toward Near-Space Communication Network in the 6G and Beyond Era},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KVJD7QZX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.12379}
}
read the original abstract

Near-space communication network (NS-ComNet), as an indispensable component of sixth-generation (6G) and beyond mobile communication systems and the space-air-ground-sea integrated network (SAGSIN), demonstrates unique advantages in wide-area coverage, long-endurance high-altitude operation, and highly flexible deployment. This paper presents a comprehensive review of NS-ComNet for 6G and beyond era. Specifically, by contrasting satellite, low-altitude unmanned-aerial-vehicle (UAV), and terrestrial communications, we first elucidate the background and motivation for integrating NS-ComNet into 6G network architectures. Subsequently, we review the developmental status of near-space platforms, including high-altitude balloons, solar-powered UAVs, and stratospheric airships, and analyze critical challenges faced by NS-ComNet. To address these challenges, the research focuses on key enabling technologies such as topology design, resource and handover management, multi-objective joint optimization, etc., with particular emphasis on artificial intelligence techniques for NS-ComNet. Finally, envisioning future intelligent collaborative networks that integrate NS-ComNet with satellite-UAV-terrestrial systems, we explore promising directions. This paper aims to provide technical insights and research foundations for the systematic construction of NS-ComNet and its deep deployment in the 6G and beyond era.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.12379 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Performance improvements from 5G to 6G. A. Background and Motivations Terrestrial networks deployed in developed and densely populated areas can achieve high economic efficiency and sustainable development at relatively low cost [5]. However, this inevitably leaves maritime, aerial, and sparsely populated terrestrial regions underserved in terms of high-speed and reliable communication. Even in dense urban environme… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The space-air-ground-sea integrated network in the 6G and beyond era. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The structure of this paper. compelling solution for communication network deployment in remote regions and serve as core hubs for cross-domain coordination in the SAGSIN. In addition, the near-space environment, characterized by weak turbulence intensity, atmospheric pressure at approxi￾mately 5% of sea-level conditions, and temperatures as low as −60 ◦C, enables near-space vehicles to maintain quasi￾stationary hov… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Representative NS-ComNet vehicles. altitude communication equipment. Its standardized payload environment design enables repeatable experimental conditions for stratospheric technology development. Technical specifica￾tions and engineering insights from this platform h…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Core challenges of dynamic evolution of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Multi-platform integrated sensing and communication [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Typical use cases of NS-ComNet. A. Topology Design to Enhance NS-ComNet Coverage Deploying NSPs for heterogeneous cross-domain networking enables rapid and flexible coverage of targeted areas requir￾ing communication services. D. Xu et al. in [51] achieved the maximiza…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The simulation results presented in [54]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Changes in coverage location or shape caused by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Comparison between traditional fully-digital/hybrid [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Transformer-based signal processing architecture for mMIMO systems in [100]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The integration of CNSC technology. VI. CONCLUSIONS NS-ComNet, as a core pillar for achieving seamless global coverage in next-generation wireless communications, is pro￾pelling the evolution of SAGSIN. By comparing the differen￾tiated characteristics of near-space wi…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

106 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Grant-free NOMA-OTFS paradigm: Enabling efficient ubiquitous access for LEO satellite internet-of-things,

    Z. Gao et al. , “Grant-free NOMA-OTFS paradigm: Enabling efficient ubiquitous access for LEO satellite internet-of-things,” IEEE Netw. , vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 18–26, Jan. 2023

    2023

  2. [7]

    Emerging space communication and network technologies for sixth-generation ubiquitous connectivity,

    Z. Gao, D. Mi, C. Jiang, S. Chatzinotas, Q. Wu, and Q. Guo, “Emerging space communication and network technologies for sixth-generation ubiquitous connectivity,” Space:Sci. Technol., vol. 4, Dec. 2024

    2024

  3. [15]

    Data-driven deep learning based hybrid beamforming for aerial massive MIMO-OFDM systems with implicit CSI,

    Z. Gao et al., “Data-driven deep learning based hybrid beamforming for aerial massive MIMO-OFDM systems with implicit CSI,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 2894–2913, Oct. 2022

    2022

  4. [27]

    Knowledge and data dual-driven channel estimation and feedback for ultra-massive MIMO systems under hybrid field beam squint effect,

    K. Wang et al. , “Knowledge and data dual-driven channel estimation and feedback for ultra-massive MIMO systems under hybrid field beam squint effect,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 11 240–11 259, Sep. 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [47]

    Hybrid knowledge-data driven channel semantic acquisi- tion and beamforming for cell-free massive MIMO,

    Z. Gao et al., “Hybrid knowledge-data driven channel semantic acquisi- tion and beamforming for cell-free massive MIMO,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 964–979, Sep. 2023

    work page 2023

  6. [85]

    Joint optimization of transmission and computation resources for satellite and high altitude platform assisted edge computing,

    C. Ding, J.-B. Wang, H. Zhang, M. Lin, and G. Y . Li, “Joint optimization of transmission and computation resources for satellite and high altitude platform assisted edge computing,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 1362–1377, Feb. 2022

    work page 2022

  7. [87]

    Integrated sensing and communication with mmWave massive MIMO: A compressed sampling perspective,

    Z. Gao et al. , “Integrated sensing and communication with mmWave massive MIMO: A compressed sampling perspective,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 1745–1762, Mar. 2023

    work page 2023

  8. [89]

    Reconfigurable massive MIMO: Harnessing the power of the electromagnetic domain for enhanced information transfer,

    K. Ying et al., “Reconfigurable massive MIMO: Harnessing the power of the electromagnetic domain for enhanced information transfer,” IEEE Wirel. Commun., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 125–132, Jun. 2024

    work page 2024

  9. [90]

    Sensing user’s channel and location with terahertz extra- large reconfigurable intelligent surface under hybrid-field beam squint effect,

    Z. Li et al., “Sensing user’s channel and location with terahertz extra- large reconfigurable intelligent surface under hybrid-field beam squint effect,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. , vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 893–911, Jul. 2023

    work page 2023

  10. [101]

    Pre-equalization aided grant-free massive access in massive MIMO system,

    Y . Wang, Y . Mei, Z. Gao, Z. Wan, B. Ning, D. Mi, and S. Muhaidat, “Pre-equalization aided grant-free massive access in massive MIMO system,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., pp. 1–6, 2025

    work page 2025

  11. [103]

    Deep joint semantic coding and beamforming for near-space airship-borne massive MIMO network,

    M. Wu et al. , “Deep joint semantic coding and beamforming for near-space airship-borne massive MIMO network,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 260–278, Jan. 2025

    work page 2025

  12. [105]

    Integrated location sensing and communication for ultra- massive MIMO with hybrid-field beam-squint effect,

    Z. Gao et al., “Integrated location sensing and communication for ultra- massive MIMO with hybrid-field beam-squint effect,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1387–1404, Apr. 2025

    work page 2025

Show all 106 references
  1. [2]

    IMT Vision-Framework and overall objectives of the future development of IMT for 2020 and beyond,

    International Telecommunication Union, “IMT Vision-Framework and overall objectives of the future development of IMT for 2020 and beyond,” ITU-R, Tech. Rep. Recommendation M.2083-0, September

    2020

  2. [3]

    IMT Vision-Framework and overall objectives of the future development of IMT for 2030 and beyond,

    ——, “IMT Vision-Framework and overall objectives of the future development of IMT for 2030 and beyond,” ITU-R, Tech. Rep. Recommendation M.2160-0, November 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.itu.int/rec/R-REC-M.2160-0-202311-I/en

    2023

  3. [4]

    Next-generation URLLC with massive devices: A unified semi-blind detection framework for sourced and unsourced random access,

    M. Ke et al., “Next-generation URLLC with massive devices: A unified semi-blind detection framework for sourced and unsourced random access,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 2223–2244, Jul. 2023

    2023

  4. [5]

    Airplane- aided integrated networking for 6G wireless: will it work?

    X. Huang, J. A. Zhang, R. P. Liu, Y . J. Guo, and L. Hanzo, “Airplane- aided integrated networking for 6G wireless: will it work?” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 84–91, Sep. 2019

    2019

  5. [6]

    Measuring GNSS multipath distributions in urban canyon environments,

    P. Xie and M. G. Petovello, “Measuring GNSS multipath distributions in urban canyon environments,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. , vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 366–377, Feb. 2015

    2015

  6. [8]

    Space-air-ground inte- grated network: A survey,

    J. Liu, Y . Shi, Z. M. Fadlullah, and N. Kato, “Space-air-ground inte- grated network: A survey,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 2714–2741, 4th Quart. 2018

    2018

  7. [9]

    Quasi-synchronous random access for massive MIMO- based LEO satellite constellations,

    K. Ying et al., “Quasi-synchronous random access for massive MIMO- based LEO satellite constellations,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1702–1722, Jun. 2023

    2023

  8. [10]

    LEO satellite constellations for 5G and beyond: How will they reshape vertical domains?

    S. Liu et al., “LEO satellite constellations for 5G and beyond: How will they reshape vertical domains?” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 30–36, Jul. 2021

    2021

  9. [11]

    Active terminal identification, channel estimation, and signal detection for grant-free NOMA-OTFS in LEO satellite internet- of-things,

    X. Zhou et al., “Active terminal identification, channel estimation, and signal detection for grant-free NOMA-OTFS in LEO satellite internet- of-things,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 2847– 2866, Apr. 2023

    2023

  10. [12]

    Unauthorized UA V countermeasure for low-altitude econ- omy: Joint communications and jamming based on MIMO cellular systems,

    Z. Li et al., “Unauthorized UA V countermeasure for low-altitude econ- omy: Joint communications and jamming based on MIMO cellular systems,” IEEE Internet Things J. , vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 6659–6672, Mar. 2025

    2025

  11. [13]

    Compressive-sensing-based grant-free massive access for 6G massive communication,

    Z. Gao et al., “Compressive-sensing-based grant-free massive access for 6G massive communication,” IEEE Internet Things J. , vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 7411–7435, Mar. 2024

    2024

  12. [14]

    Survey on UA V cellular communications: Practical aspects, standardization advancements, regulation, and security challenges,

    A. Fotouhi, H. Qiang, M. Ding, M. Hassan, L. G. Giordano, A. Garcia- Rodriguez, and J. Yuan, “Survey on UA V cellular communications: Practical aspects, standardization advancements, regulation, and security challenges,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 3417–3442...

    2019

  13. [16]

    Deep learning-based rate-splitting multiple access for re- configurable intelligent surface-aided tera-hertz massive MIMO,

    M. Wu et al., “Deep learning-based rate-splitting multiple access for re- configurable intelligent surface-aided tera-hertz massive MIMO,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1431–1451, May. 2023. 17

    2023

  14. [17]

    Nullforming-based precoder for spectrum sharing between HAPS and terrestrial mobile networks,

    K. Tashiro, K. Hoshino, and A. Nagate, “Nullforming-based precoder for spectrum sharing between HAPS and terrestrial mobile networks,” IEEE Access., vol. 10, pp. 55 675–55 693, May. 2022

    2022

  15. [18]

    Spectrum sharing between high-altitude platforms and terrestrial networks using interfer- ence coordination by null sweeping,

    T. Ishikawa, K. Tashiro, K. Hoshino, and A. Nagate, “Spectrum sharing between high-altitude platforms and terrestrial networks using interfer- ence coordination by null sweeping,” in 2023 IEEE 98th Veh Technol Conf (VTC2023-Fall), Oct. 2023, pp. 1–6

    2023

  16. [19]

    High-altitude platforms-present situation and technology trends,

    F. A. d’Oliveira, F. C. L. de Melo, and T. C. Devezas, “High-altitude platforms-present situation and technology trends,” J. Aerosp. Technol. Manag., vol. 8, no. 3, Jul. 2016

    2016

  17. [20]

    Airborne communication networks: a survey,

    X. Cao, P. Yang, M. Alzenad, X. Xi, D. Wu, and H. Yanikomeroglu, “Airborne communication networks: a survey,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 1907–1926, Sep. 2018

    1907

  18. [21]

    Air-ground heterogeneous networks for 5G and beyond via integrating high and low altitude platforms,

    J. Qiu, D. Grace, G. Ding, M. D. Zakaria, and Q. Wu, “Air-ground heterogeneous networks for 5G and beyond via integrating high and low altitude platforms,” IEEE Wirel. Commun., vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 140– 148, Dec. 2019

    2019

  19. [22]

    A review of wireless communication using high-altitude platforms for extended coverage and capacity,

    S. C. Arum, D. Grace, and P. D. Mitchell, “A review of wireless communication using high-altitude platforms for extended coverage and capacity,” Comput. Commun., vol. 157, pp. 232–256, May. 2020

    2020

  20. [23]

    A vision and framework for the high altitude platform station (HAPS) networks of the future,

    G. Karabulut Kurt, M. G. Khoshkholgh, S. Alfattani, A. Ibrahim, T. S. J. Darwish, M. S. Alam, H. Yanikomeroglu, and A. Yongacoglu, “A vision and framework for the high altitude platform station (HAPS) networks of the future,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 729–...

    2021

  21. [24]

    Near space communications: A new regime in space-air-ground integrated networks,

    Z. Xiao, T. Mao, Z. Han, and X.-G. Xia, “Near space communications: A new regime in space-air-ground integrated networks,” IEEE Wirel. Commun., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 38–45, Dec. 2022

    2022

  22. [25]

    Terahertz-band near-space communications: From a physical-layer perspective,

    T. Mao, L. Zhang, Z. Xiao, Z. Han, and X.-G. Xia, “Terahertz-band near-space communications: From a physical-layer perspective,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 110–116, Feb. 2024

    2024

  23. [26]

    Near-space communications: The last piece of 6G space–air–ground–sea integrated network puzzle,

    H. Liu et al. , “Near-space communications: The last piece of 6G space–air–ground–sea integrated network puzzle,” Space:Sci. Technol., vol. 4, Aug. 2024

    2024

  24. [28]

    [Online]

    Loon: Expanding internet connectivity with stratospheric balloons. [Online]. Available: https://x.company/projects/loon/

  25. [29]

    [Online]

    (2020) Elevate. [Online]. [Online]. Available: http://www.zero2infinity. space/elevate/

    2020

  26. [30]

    Chinese scientists break aerostat altitude record,

    Z. Zhihao, “Chinese scientists break aerostat altitude record,” China Daily, May 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/ a/202205/16/WS6281a484a310fd2b29e5cdc6.html

    2022

  27. [31]

    [Online]

    (2020) HAPSMobile. [Online]. Available: https://www.hapsmobile.com/

    2020

  28. [32]

    [Online]

    (2020) Zephyr pioneering the stratosphere. [Online]. Available: https://www.airbus.com/defence/uav/zephyr.html

    2020

  29. [33]

    [Online]

    (2020) StratXX. [Online]. Available: http://www.stratxx.com/

    2020

  30. [34]

    L. P. (2021) China’s yuanmeng (dream) stratospheric airship. [Online]. Available: https://lynceans.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/ China Yuanmeng-stratospheric-airship.pdf

    2021

  31. [35]

    Available: https://www

    (2020) What’s up with stratobus? [Online]. Available: https://www. thalesgroup.com/en/worldwide/space/news/whats-stratobus

    2020

  32. [36]

    High-altitude platforms-present situation and technology trends,

    F. A. d’Oliveira, F. C. L. d. Melo, and T. C. Devezas, “High-altitude platforms-present situation and technology trends,” J. Aerosp. Technol. Manage., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 249–262, Jul-Sep. 2016

    2016

  33. [37]

    Direct observations of cross-scale energy transfer in space plasmas,

    J.-H. Li, X.-Z. Zhou, Z.-Y . Liu, S. Wang, Y . Omura, L. Li, C. Yue, Q.- G. Zong, G. Le, C. T. Russell et al., “Direct observations of cross-scale energy transfer in space plasmas,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.05744 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  34. [38]

    The vlasiator 5.2 ionosphere–coupling a magnetospheric hybrid-vlasov simulation with a height-integrated ionosphere model,

    U. Ganse, Y . Pfau-Kempf, H. Zhou, L. Juusola, A. Workayehu, F. Kebede, K. Papadakis, M. Grandin, M. Alho, M. Battarbee et al. , “The vlasiator 5.2 ionosphere–coupling a magnetospheric hybrid-vlasov simulation with a height-integrated ionosphere model,” Geosci. Model Dev., vol...

    2025

  35. [40]

    Direct observations of cross-scale wave-particle energy transfer in space plasmas,

    J.-H. Li, X.-Z. Zhou, Z.-Y . Liu, S. Wang, Y . Omura, L. Li, C. Yue, Q.- G. Zong, G. Le, C. T. Russell, and J. L. Burch, “Direct observations of cross-scale wave-particle energy transfer in space plasmas,” Sci. Adv., vol. 11, no. 6, Feb. 2025

    2025

  36. [41]

    A multi-satellite space environment risk prediction and real- time warning system for satellite safety management,

    N. Kang, L. Zhang, W. Zong, P. Huang, Y . Zhang, C. Zhou, J. Qiao, and B. Xue, “A multi-satellite space environment risk prediction and real- time warning system for satellite safety management,” Remote Sens. , vol. 16, no. 10, May. 2024

    2024

  37. [42]

    Path planning of stratospheric airship in dynamic wind field based on deep reinforcement learning,

    B. Zheng, M. Zhu, X. Guo, J. Ou, and J. Yuan, “Path planning of stratospheric airship in dynamic wind field based on deep reinforcement learning,” Aerosp. Sci. Technol., vol. 150, Jul. 2024

    2024

  38. [43]

    Challenges and solutions for low-temperature lithium–sulfur batteries: A review,

    Y . Liu, T. Qin, P. Wang, M. Yuan, Q. Li, and S. Feng, “Challenges and solutions for low-temperature lithium–sulfur batteries: A review,” Materials, vol. 16, no. 12, Jun. 2023

    2023

  39. [44]

    Energy management of solar-powered aircraft-based high altitude plat- form for wireless communications,

    S. C. Arum, D. Grace, P. D. Mitchell, M. D. Zakaria, and N. Morozs, “Energy management of solar-powered aircraft-based high altitude plat- form for wireless communications,” Electronics, vol. 9, no. 1, Jan. 2020

    2020

  40. [45]

    Stability challenges for a highly efficient perovskite/silicon tandem solar cell: A review,

    S. A. U. Hasan, M. A. Zahid, S. Park, and J. Yi, “Stability challenges for a highly efficient perovskite/silicon tandem solar cell: A review,” Solar RRL, vol. 8, no. 6, Feb. 2024

    2024

  41. [46]

    Space-air-ground-sea integrated networks: Modeling and coverage analysis,

    J. Xu, M. A. Kishk, and M.-S. Alouini, “Space-air-ground-sea integrated networks: Modeling and coverage analysis,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 6298–6313, Sep. 2023

    2023

  42. [48]

    Deep rein- forcement learning based modulation and coding scheme selection in cognitive heterogeneous networks,

    L. Zhang, J. Tan, Y .-C. Liang, G. Feng, and D. Niyato, “Deep rein- forcement learning based modulation and coding scheme selection in cognitive heterogeneous networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.02868 , 2018

    2018 arXiv

  43. [49]

    Game-theoretic power control for interference mitigation in two-tier small cell networks,

    Y . Wang, M. Qian, X. Han, Y . Zhou, and J. Shi, “Game-theoretic power control for interference mitigation in two-tier small cell networks,” in 2014 IEEE 79th Veh. Technol. Conf. (VTC Spring) . IEEE, May. 2014, pp. 1–5

    2014

  44. [50]

    Learning to optimize: Training deep neural networks for wireless resource management,

    H. Sun, X. Chen, Q. Shi, M. Hong, X. Fu, and N. D. Sidiropoulos, “Learning to optimize: Training deep neural networks for wireless resource management,” in 18th IEEE Workshop Signal Process. Adv. Wireless Commun. (SPAWC), Jul. 2017, pp. 1–6

    2017

  45. [51]

    Coverage ratio optimization for HAP communications,

    D. Xu, X. Yi, Z. Chen, C. Li, C. Zhang, and B. Xia, “Coverage ratio optimization for HAP communications,” in 2017 IEEE Int Symp Person Indoor Mobile Radio Commun (PIMRC) , Oct. 2017, pp. 1–5

    2017

  46. [52]

    Design of energy efficient multi-HAPS assisted hybrid RF/FSO satellite communi- cation systems with optimal placement,

    S. E. Turk, E. S. Ahrazoglu, E. Erdogan, and I. Altunbas, “Design of energy efficient multi-HAPS assisted hybrid RF/FSO satellite communi- cation systems with optimal placement,” IEEE Trans. Green Commun. Networking, 2024

    2024

  47. [53]

    System design of gigabit HAPS mobile communications,

    Y . Shibata, N. Kanazawa, M. Konishi, K. Hoshino, Y . Ohta, and A. Nagate, “System design of gigabit HAPS mobile communications,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 157 995–158 007, Aug. 2020

    2020

  48. [54]

    HAPS in the Non- terrestrial network nexus: Prospective architectures and performance insights,

    Z. Lou, B. E. Youcef Belmekki, and M.-S. Alouini, “HAPS in the Non- terrestrial network nexus: Prospective architectures and performance insights,” IEEE Wirel. Commun., vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 52–58, Dec. 2023

    2023

  49. [55]

    Optimal deployment strategy of airships for near- space communication system using multiobjective advanced evolution- ary algorithm,

    A. MS and M. A, “Optimal deployment strategy of airships for near- space communication system using multiobjective advanced evolution- ary algorithm,” Int J Commun Syst. , vol. 37, no. 3, Nov. 2023

    2023

  50. [56]

    Combined control of coverage area and HAPS deployment in hybrid FSO/RF SAGIN,

    K. Mashiko, Y . Kawamoto, N. Kato, K. Yoshida, and M. Ariyoshi, “Combined control of coverage area and HAPS deployment in hybrid FSO/RF SAGIN,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 2025

    2025

  51. [57]

    HAP networking enables highly reliable space-air-ground optical interconnect: An integrated network perspective,

    Z. Niu, H. Yang, Q. Yao, S. Yin, S. Shen, B. Wei, J. Zhang, and A. V . Vasilakos, “HAP networking enables highly reliable space-air-ground optical interconnect: An integrated network perspective,” IEEE Netw., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 224–231, Mar. 2025

    2025

  52. [58]

    Exploiting platform diversity for GoS improvement for users with different high altitude platform availability,

    Y . Liu, D. Grace, and P. D. Mitchell, “Exploiting platform diversity for GoS improvement for users with different high altitude platform availability,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 196– 203, Jan. 2009

    2009

  53. [59]

    Channel allocation for hot spot areas in HAPS communication based on the prediction of mobile user characteristics,

    M. Guan, L. Wang, and L. Chen, “Channel allocation for hot spot areas in HAPS communication based on the prediction of mobile user characteristics,” Intell. Autom. Soft Comput., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 613–620, Apr. 2016

    2016

  54. [60]

    Forming a two-tier heterogeneous air-network via combination of high and low altitude platforms,

    H. Ahmadinejad and A. Falahati, “Forming a two-tier heterogeneous air-network via combination of high and low altitude platforms,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 1989–2001, Feb. 2022

    1989

  55. [61]

    HAPS-UA V-enabled heterogeneous networks: A deep reinforcement learning approach,

    A. H. Arani, P. Hu, and Y . Zhu, “HAPS-UA V-enabled heterogeneous networks: A deep reinforcement learning approach,” IEEE open j. Commun. Soc., vol. 4, pp. 1745–1760, Jul. 2023

    2023

  56. [62]

    Improvement of the global connectiv- ity using integrated satellite-airborne-terrestrial networks with resource optimization,

    A. Alsharoa and M.-S. Alouini, “Improvement of the global connectiv- ity using integrated satellite-airborne-terrestrial networks with resource optimization,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 5088– 5100, Aug. 2020

    2020

  57. [63]

    Optimizing power allocation in HAPs assisted LEO satellite communications,

    Z. Ali, Z. Rezki, and M.-S. Alouini, “Optimizing power allocation in HAPs assisted LEO satellite communications,” IEEE Trans. mach. learn. commun. netw., vol. 2, pp. 1661–1677, Nov. 2024. 18

    2024

  58. [64]

    Multi-HAP-assisted computation offloading in space-air-ground-sea integrated network,

    W. Wu, W. Feng, Y . Fang, Z. Lin, and X. Lu, “Multi-HAP-assisted computation offloading in space-air-ground-sea integrated network,” IEEE Internet Things J. , 2025

    2025

  59. [65]

    Improved LMS predictive link triggering for handover in HAPS communication system,

    P. He, N. Cheng, and S. Ni, “Improved LMS predictive link triggering for handover in HAPS communication system,” in 2016 8th Int. Conf. Wirel. Commun. Signal Process., (WCSP) , Oct. 2016, pp. 1–5

    2016

  60. [66]

    A handover decision algorithm with an adaptive threshold applied in HAPS communication system,

    S.-y. Ni, S. Jin, and H.-l. Hong, “A handover decision algorithm with an adaptive threshold applied in HAPS communication system,” in Commun. Comput. Info. Sci. , Sep. 2016, pp. 38–47

    2016

  61. [67]

    An intelligent hand-off algorithm to enhance quality of service in high altitude platforms using neural network,

    S. Alsamhi and N. Rajput, “An intelligent hand-off algorithm to enhance quality of service in high altitude platforms using neural network,” Chin. J. Electron, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 2059–2073, Jan. 2015

    2015

  62. [68]

    Deployment of high altitude platforms network: A game theoretic approach,

    R. Zong, X. Gao, X. Wang, and L. Zongting, “Deployment of high altitude platforms network: A game theoretic approach,” in 2012 Int. Conf. Comput., Networking Commun., (ICNC) , Jan. 2012, pp. 304–308

    2012

  63. [69]

    Optimization of HAPS placement in hybrid FSO/RF space- air-ground integrated networks,

    K. Mashiko, Y . Kawamoto, N. Kato, M. Ariyoshi, K. Sugyo, and J. Funada, “Optimization of HAPS placement in hybrid FSO/RF space- air-ground integrated networks,” in IET. Conf. Proc. , vol. Sep. 2024, no. 31, 2024, pp. 8–12

    2024

  64. [70]

    On the performance and optimization of HAPS assisted dual-hop hybrid RF/FSO system,

    R. Deka, V . Mishra, I. Ahmed, S. Anees, and M. S. Alam, “On the performance and optimization of HAPS assisted dual-hop hybrid RF/FSO system,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 80 976–80 988, Aug. 2022

    2022

  65. [71]

    MEC-enhanced aerial serving networks via HAP: A deep reinforcement learning approach,

    T. P. Truong, A.-T. Tran, T. M. T. Nguyen, T.-V . Nguyen, A. Masood, and S. Cho, “MEC-enhanced aerial serving networks via HAP: A deep reinforcement learning approach,” in 2022 Int. Conf. Inf. Networking (ICOIN), Jan. 2022, pp. 319–323

    2022

  66. [72]

    Downlink and uplink sum rate maximization for HAP-LAP cooperated networks,

    Y . He, D. Wang, F. Huang, R. Zhang, X. Gu, and J. Pan, “Downlink and uplink sum rate maximization for HAP-LAP cooperated networks,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 71, no. 9, pp. 9516–9531, Sep. 2022

    2022

  67. [73]

    AoI minimization based on deep reinforcement learning and matching game for IoT information collection in SAGIN,

    G. Zhang, X. Wei, X. Tan, Z. Han, and G. Zhang, “AoI minimization based on deep reinforcement learning and matching game for IoT information collection in SAGIN,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , 2025

    2025

  68. [74]

    Comparative study for coordinating multiple unmanned HAPS for communications area coverage,

    O. Anicho, P. B. Charlesworth, G. S. Baicher, A. Nagar, and N. Buckley, “Comparative study for coordinating multiple unmanned HAPS for communications area coverage,” in 2019 Int. Conf. Unmanned Aircr. Syst., (ICUAS), Jun. 2019, pp. 467–474

    2019

  69. [75]

    An intelligent wireless channel allocation in HAPS 5G communication system based on reinforcement learning,

    M. Guan, Z. Wu, Y . Cui, and X. Cao, “An intelligent wireless channel allocation in HAPS 5G communication system based on reinforcement learning,” EURASIP J WIREL COMM , vol. 138, no. 2019, May. 2019

    2019

  70. [76]

    Neural-network-based dynamic area optimization algorithm for high-altitude platform station,

    W. Takabatake, Y . Shibata, and K. Hoshino, “Neural-network-based dynamic area optimization algorithm for high-altitude platform station,” in 2023 IEEE 98th Veh Technol Conf (VTC2023-Fall) , Oct. 2023, pp. 1–6

    2023

  71. [77]

    Blockchain-empowered resource allocation in HAPS- assisted IoV digital twin networks: A federated DRL approach,

    H. N. Abishu, A. M. Seid, R. H. Jhaveri, T. R. Gadekallu, A. Erbad, and M. Guizani, “Blockchain-empowered resource allocation in HAPS- assisted IoV digital twin networks: A federated DRL approach,” IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh., pp. 1–17, 2024

    2024

  72. [78]

    FedHAP: Fast federated learning for LEO constellations using collaborative HAPs,

    M. Elmahallawy and T. Luo, “FedHAP: Fast federated learning for LEO constellations using collaborative HAPs,” in 2022 14th IEEE Int. Conf. Wirel. Commun. Signal Process., (WCSP) , Nov. 2022, pp. 888–893

    2022

  73. [79]

    Communication-efficient federated learning for LEO constellations integrated with HAPs using hybrid NOMA-OFDM,

    M. Elmahallawy, T. Luo, and K. Ramadan, “Communication-efficient federated learning for LEO constellations integrated with HAPs using hybrid NOMA-OFDM,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1097–1114, May. 2024

    2024

  74. [80]

    Deep reinforcement learning for multi-user access control in non-terrestrial networks,

    Y . Cao, S.-Y . Lien, and Y .-C. Liang, “Deep reinforcement learning for multi-user access control in non-terrestrial networks,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 1605–1619, Mar. 2021

    2021

  75. [81]

    Edge computing in the industrial internet of things environment: Software-defined-networks-based edge-cloud interplay,

    K. Kaur, S. Garg, G. S. Aujla, N. Kumar, J. J. P. C. Rodrigues, and M. Guizani, “Edge computing in the industrial internet of things environment: Software-defined-networks-based edge-cloud interplay,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 44–51, Feb. 2018

    2018

  76. [82]

    Network function virtual- ization: Challenges and opportunities for innovations,

    B. Han, V . Gopalakrishnan, L. Ji, and S. Lee, “Network function virtual- ization: Challenges and opportunities for innovations,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 90–97, Feb. 2015

    2015

  77. [83]

    Network slicing: Recent advances, taxonomy, requirements, and open research challenges,

    L. U. Khan, I. Yaqoob, N. H. Tran, Z. Han, and C. S. Hong, “Network slicing: Recent advances, taxonomy, requirements, and open research challenges,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 36 009–36 028, Feb. 2020

    2020

  78. [84]

    A comprehensive survey of network function virtualization,

    B. Yi, X. Wang, K. Li, S. K. Das, and M. Huang, “A comprehensive survey of network function virtualization,” Comput. Netw., vol. 133, pp. 212–262, Mar. 2018

    2018

  79. [86]

    Massive digital over-the-air computation for communication-efficient federated edge learning,

    L. Qiao et al. , “Massive digital over-the-air computation for communication-efficient federated edge learning,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 3078–3094, Nov. 2024

    2024

  80. [88]

    An information-theoretic characterization of MIMO-FAS: Optimization, diversity-multiplexing tradeoff and q-outage capacity,

    W. K. New, K.-K. Wong, H. Xu, K.-F. Tong, and C.-B. Chae, “An information-theoretic characterization of MIMO-FAS: Optimization, diversity-multiplexing tradeoff and q-outage capacity,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 5541–5556, Jun. 2024

    2024

  81. [91]

    Mutual information optimization for SIM-based holographic MIMO systems,

    N. Stefan Perovi ´c and L.-N. Tran, “Mutual information optimization for SIM-based holographic MIMO systems,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 2583–2587, Nov. 2024

    2024

  82. [92]

    Reconfigurable massive MIMO: Precoding design and channel estimation in the electromagnetic domain,

    K. Ying et al. , “Reconfigurable massive MIMO: Precoding design and channel estimation in the electromagnetic domain,” IEEE Trans. Commun., 2024

    2024

  83. [93]

    An overview of signal processing techniques for terahertz communications,

    H. Sarieddeen, M.-S. Alouini, and T. Y . Al-Naffouri, “An overview of signal processing techniques for terahertz communications,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 109, no. 10, pp. 1628–1665, Oct. 2021

    2021

  84. [94]

    Survey on free space optical commu- nication: A communication theory perspective,

    M. A. Khalighi and M. Uysal, “Survey on free space optical commu- nication: A communication theory perspective,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 2231–2258, 4th Quart. 2014

    2014

  85. [95]

    Hybrid FSO/THz-based backhaul network for mmWave terrestrial communi- cation,

    P. K. Singya, B. Makki, A. D’Errico, and M.-S. Alouini, “Hybrid FSO/THz-based backhaul network for mmWave terrestrial communi- cation,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 4342–4359, Jul. 2023

    2023

  86. [96]

    Transceiver architecture for incoherent optical CDMA network based on polarization modulation,

    M. M. Karbassian and H. Ghafouri-Shiraz, “Transceiver architecture for incoherent optical CDMA network based on polarization modulation,” J. Lightw. Technol., vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 3820–3828, Dec. 2008

    2008

  87. [97]

    Feasibility of quantum key distribution from high altitude platforms,

    Y . Chu, R. Donaldson, R. Kumar, and D. Grace, “Feasibility of quantum key distribution from high altitude platforms,” Quantum Sci. Technol. , vol. 6, no. 3, Jun. 2021

    2021

  88. [98]

    Satellite quantum communications: Fundamental bounds and practical security,

    S. Pirandola, “Satellite quantum communications: Fundamental bounds and practical security,” Phys. Rev. Res., vol. 3, May. 2021

    2021

  89. [99]

    Quantum random number generation,

    X. Ma, X. Yuan, Z. Cao, B. Qi, and Z. Zhang, “Quantum random number generation,” Npj Quantum Inf. , Jun. 2016

    2016

  90. [100]

    Transformer-empowered 6G intelligent networks: From massive MIMO processing to semantic communication,

    Y . Wang et al., “Transformer-empowered 6G intelligent networks: From massive MIMO processing to semantic communication,” IEEE Wirel. Commun., vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 127–135, Dec. 2023

    2023

  91. [102]

    Direct-to-smartphone for 6G NTN: Technical routes, challenges, and key technologies,

    Y . He, Y . Xiao, S. Zhang, M. Jia, and Z. Li, “Direct-to-smartphone for 6G NTN: Technical routes, challenges, and key technologies,” IEEE Netw., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 128–135, Jul. 2024

    2024

  92. [104]

    Latency-aware generative semantic communications with pre-trained diffusion models,

    L. Qiao et al. , “Latency-aware generative semantic communications with pre-trained diffusion models,” IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett., vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 2652–2656, Oct. 2024

    2024

  93. [106]

    AI empowered channel semantic acquisition for 6G integrated sensing and communication networks,

    Y . Zhang et al. , “AI empowered channel semantic acquisition for 6G integrated sensing and communication networks,” IEEE Netw., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 45–53, Mar. 2024

    2024

  94. [2015]

    Available: https://www.itu.int/dms pubrec/itu-r/rec/m/ R-REC-M.2083-0-201509-I!!PDF-E.pdf

    [Online]. Available: https://www.itu.int/dms pubrec/itu-r/rec/m/ R-REC-M.2083-0-201509-I!!PDF-E.pdf

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.