Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

The CHIME/FRB Discovery of the Extremely Active Fast Radio Burst Source FRB 20240114A

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.13297 v1 pith:2YELC7Z5 submitted 2025-05-19 astro-ph.HE

classification astro-ph.HE
keywords burstburstschimeactiveradiosourcediscoveredfind
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Among the thousands of observed fast radio bursts (FRBs), a few sources exhibit exceptionally high burst activity observable by many telescopes across a broad range of radio frequencies. Almost all of these highly active repeaters have been discovered by CHIME/FRB, due to its daily observations of the entire Northern sky as a transit radio telescope. FRB 20240114A is a source discovered and reported by CHIME/FRB to the community in January 2024; given its low declination, even the detection of a few bursts hints at a high burst rate. Following the community announcement of this source as a potentially active repeater, it was extensively followed up by other observatories and has emerged as one of the most prolific FRB repeaters ever observed. This paper presents the five bursts CHIME/FRB observed from FRB 20240114A, with channelized raw voltage data saved for two bursts. We do not observe changes in the DM of the source greater than ~1.3 pc cm$^{-3}$ in our observations over nearly a year baseline. We find an RM of ~ +320 rad m$^{-2}$. We do not find evidence for scattering at the level of < 0.3 ms in the bursts, and we find no evidence for astrophysical scintillation. In our observations of FRB 20240114A, we see a burst rate ~49x higher than the median burst rate of apparent non-repeaters also discovered by CHIME/FRB. Each discovery of highly active FRBs provides a valuable opportunity to investigate whether there is a fundamental difference between repeating and apparently non-repeating sources.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can repeating and non-repeating FRBs be drawn from the same population?

    astro-ph.HE 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    FRB sources follow a Zipf-like inverse relation between number density and burst rate, and a single power-law population with index a≈1.1-1.3 can explain the observed repeater fraction, the SGR count ratio, and the cl...

  2. Long-term simultaneous 2.25/8.60~GHz monitoring of the newly-discovered repeating FRB~20240114A

    astro-ph.HE 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A year of simultaneous 2.25 and 8.60 GHz monitoring of FRB 20240114A caught 155 bursts at the low frequency, none at the high frequency, revealing strong frequency-dependent activity.

  3. The magnetar model's energy crisis for a prolific repeating fast radio burst source

    astro-ph.HE 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    FRB 20240114A's estimated energy output over 214 days exceeds 86% of a typical magnetar's dipole magnetic energy, the strongest such constraint yet, if typical beaming and efficiency are assumed.

  4. Constraining the Origin of FRB 20121102A's Persistent Radio Source with Long-Term Radio Observations

    astro-ph.HE 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Seven years of radio monitoring show FRB 20121102A's persistent source is stable at 213 ± 4 µJy with variability consistent with interstellar scintillation, disfavoring young magnetar nebula models.

  5. Semi-supervised morphological classification of fast radio bursts from the second CHIME/FRB catalogue

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A simulation-trained convolutional autoencoder identifies three distinct FRB morphological classes and classifies repeatability with 86% recall.

Pith tools