Pith. sign in

REVIEW 141 references

Quasar identifications from the slitless spectra: a test from 3D-HST

T0 review · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper presents a forward-modeling, BIC-based quasar selection method for 3D-HST G141 grism spectra, recovering 90% of point-like known quasars with about 5% ELG contamination and yielding 19 new quasar candidates.

arxiv 2505.14025 v1 pith:NK4ORQF6 submitted 2025-05-20 astro-ph.GA

Yuxuan Pang , Xue-Bing Wu , Yuming Fu , Rui Zhu , Tao Ji , Qinchun Ma , Xiaotong Feng This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords qsosemissionlinesslitlessspectracandidatesd-hstelgs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Hubble's 3D-HST survey took low-resolution grism spectra that smear every object into a rainbow. In such spectra, a quasar's broad gas lines and an ordinary galaxy's narrow lines can look identical, because galaxies are fuzzy and their light gets smeared too. The team built a two-step filter. First, they picked out about 6,000 sources whose emission lines looked unusually broad. Second, for each candidate they ran forward modeling: they tried to reproduce the two-dimensional spectrum with galaxy templates, then again with an added quasar template. Sources where the quasar template clearly improved the fit, judged by the Bayesian Information Criterion and a strong quasar coefficient, were kept.

The filter was tested on 35 known quasars and 322 known emission-line galaxies. For point-like quasars, it recovered 19 of 21; for galaxies, it wrongly flagged about 5 percent. Applying it to the broad-line sample produced 19 new quasar candidates at redshifts 0.12 to 1.56. Twelve have Chandra X-ray detections, three were later confirmed by DESI, and one matches an earlier SED-selected AGN. The authors also estimated black hole masses, mostly around 10^7 to 10^8 solar masses.

The method is a calibrated classification tool, not a physical derivation. Its main limitation is that the calibration sample is small and favors point-like quasars, so host-galaxy-dominated quasars are mostly missed. The authors argue the same pipeline can be adapted to Euclid and the Chinese Space Station Telescope, where large slitless surveys are planned.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim, stated in Sections 3.2.5 and 6, is that the DeltaBIC>0 and ratioQ>3 forward-modeling criteria recover about 90% (19/21) of point-like known QSOs with Halpha or Hbeta in the G141 band while keeping DEEP2 ELG contamination near 4.8% (15/311), and that applying the criteria to the broad-line sample yields 19 new QSO candidates at z=0.12-1.56, 12 with Chandra X-ray detections, improving QSO completeness at z=0.8-1.6.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative performance rates are computed on the same small calibration set used to choose the thresholds: 35 known QSOs (21 point-like) and 322 DEEP2/ZFIRE ELGs, all F140W<23 and each with Halpha/Hbeta in the G141 window (Sections 2.3, 3.2.2, 3.2.3). If those color-, catalog-, and magnitude-selected labels are not representative of the 6,818 broad-line sources, the 90% recovery and 5% contamination figures, and therefore the 19 candidates, inherit that bias. The paper provides no held-out or cross-validated test of threshold transfer.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on template completeness, label accuracy, and selection thresholds chosen from calibration data. The paper introduces no new physical entities and no first-principles derivation. The most consequential assumptions are that the FSPS plus QSO composite template set spans real spectral diversity and that the small known QSO/ELG catalogs represent the broad-line population.

free parameters (7)
  • ratioQ threshold = >3
    Chosen from the distribution of 35 known QSOs and 322 ELGs in Figure 6 (Eq. 2); no cross-validation.
  • DeltaBIC cutoff = >0
    Selected as the minimum positive improvement in BIC; Table 4 shows that stricter cutoffs change completeness and contamination.
  • Av extinction range = 0 to 0.6 mag
    Adopted to make templates redder, motivated by Baron et al. but implemented as a modeling range in Section 3.2.1.
  • PSF flux threshold = 25%
    Defines point-like versus host-dominant QSOs in Section 3.2.2 and is used to report the 90% recovery rate.
  • Redshift fitting window = 0.15 times (1+z) or 0.15 around spec-z
    Centers Grizli fits and affects line identification, especially for single-line sources in Section 2.2.
  • Instrumental FWHM correction = ~1000 km/s
    Subtracted in quadrature from observed FWHM before black-hole mass estimates (Eq. 3).
  • Broad-line detection threshold = 2-sigma over 3 consecutive pixels, quoted as FWHM > 2000 km/s
    Used in Section 3.1 to define the initial broad-line sample; changes here change the candidate pool.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption FSPS galaxy templates plus one SDSS QSO composite template, with SMC extinction, can represent the 2D spectral diversity of both quasars and emission-line galaxies.
    Core modeling assumption in Section 3.2.1: DeltaBIC and ratioQ separate QSOs from ELGs only if the template set brackets the true spectral shapes.
  • domain assumption Grizli contamination model and optimal 1D extraction correctly isolate source spectra from overlapping objects.
    Used in Sections 2.2 and 3.1 to define the 6,818-source broad-line sample; contamination errors propagate into the candidate list.
  • domain assumption SDSS DR16Q, Milliquas, DEEP2, and ZFIRE provide correct class labels for calibration.
    Section 2.3: Milliquas contains photometric candidates, DEEP2 classifications have reduced reliability at low luminosity, and some ELGs may hide weak AGNs, making the contamination rate uncertain.
  • standard math BIC with k ln(n) plus chi-square is a valid model comparison for these 2D grism fits.
    Section 3.2.1: standard BIC, but independence of spectral pixels is assumed without discussion, which affects the penalty term.
  • domain assumption The GBDT photo-z places single-line sources within 0.15(1+z) of the true redshift.
    Appendix A reports about 90% within this window; the remaining 10% can be fitted with wrong line identifications and enter the candidate list.
  • domain assumption QSOs and ELGs in the 3D-HST fields with F140W<23 are representative of the target population at z=0.6-2.4.
    Needed to transfer the calibrated thresholds to the full broad-line sample; Section 3.2.2 shows host-dominant QSOs are underrepresented, so representativeness is questionable.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quasar identifications from the slitless spectra: a test from 3D-HST." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NK4ORQF6

@misc{pith2026250514025,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quasar identifications from the slitless spectra: a test from 3D-HST},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NK4ORQF6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.14025}
}
abstract

Slitless spectroscopy is a traditional method for selecting quasars. In this paper, we develop a procedure for selecting quasars (QSOs) using the 3D-HST G141 slitless spectra. We initially identify over 6,000 sources with emission lines broader than those typically found in emission line galaxies (ELGs) by analyzing the 1D spectra. These ``broad'' emission lines may originate from actual QSO broad lines ($\rm FWHM\geq1200~\rm km/s$) or the convolved narrow lines ($\rm FWHM = 200\sim 300\rm km/s$) in ELGs with effective radii $\geq$0.3" (2.5Kpc at z=1). We then propose a criterion based on the reliability of the QSO component in the forward modeling results. Using the known QSOs, ELGs, and simulation spectra, we find that our criterion successfully selects about 90\% of known QSOs with H$\alpha$ or H$\beta$ line detection and point-like structures, with an ELG contamination rate of about 5\%. We apply this method to emission line sources without significant contamination and select 19 QSO candidates at redshift $z=0.12-1.56$. 12 of these candidates have Chandra X-ray detections. This sample covers a broader range of the rest-frame UV colors and has redder optical slopes compared to the SDSS QSOs, yet it is more likely to be composed of normal QSOs rather than little red dots. Through spectral analysis, the estimated black hole masses of the sample are $10^{6.9}-10^{8.3} M_{\odot}$. Our new candidates improve the completeness of the QSO sample at $z=0.8-1.6$ in the 3D-HST field. The proposed method will also be helpful for QSO selections via slitless spectroscopy in Euclid and the Chinese Space Station Telescope.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.14025 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The procedure for detecting QSOs from 3D-HST grism data. The left side of the panel illustrates the two-step process, while the right dashed boxes show the specific steps. 3.1 Step1: Broad emission line detection The 3D-HST project provides over 200,000 G141 grism spectra, comprising ∼22,000 sources with the detected H𝛼, H𝛽, or [O III] emission lines at SNR > 3. To reduce the sample size for detailed fitting, we ini… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Illustrations of the emission line detection methods in 1D spectra from the 3D-HST v4.1 data release. The left figure shows a distorted spectrum with an irregular continuum, while the right figure depicts a relatively normal emission line source. In each figure, the upper panels display the continuum fitting process: the grey lines represent the raw data, the black dots indicate the data selected for continuum fitti… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Illustration of sources that have serious contaminations. The 2D and 1D slitless spectra are taken from the 3D-HST data release (Momcheva et al. 2016). The upper left panel in each figure gives the reference image. The following three 2D figures show the 2D slitless spectra, model, and contamination model provided by the 3D-HST data release. The lower panels compare the model and contamination shown as blue and red … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The redshift and F140W AB magnitude distribution of sources in our one and two emission line (red dots) samples. The ASERA visual inspection results give the redshift of two emission line sources, while for the one emission line source, the redshift is given by the pre…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Examples of two ELGs confirmed by the DEEP2 survey that have 1D G141 grism spectra resembling type 1 QSOs, AEGIS-24556 (left panel) and AEGIS-31909 (right panel). The top row shows the F140W image alongside the 2D G141 grism data, while the bottom row displays the extr…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The distribution of QSOs and ELGs in a parameter space defined by the ratio of QSO composite spectral coefficients (𝑟 𝑎𝑡 𝑖𝑜𝑄, horizontal axis) and the difference in the Bayesian information Criterion (Δ𝐵𝐼𝐶, vertical axis). The top and right-side insets display cumulati…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: 2D emission line map and modeling results of typical objects in G141 slitless spectra. Columns from left to right: F140W reference image (the source name annotated at upper right corner; angular scale and physical scale indicated below), 2D G141 slitless spectrum (the …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Examples of F140W image decomposition results. Three panels from left to right show the F140W image, Galfit model, and residual. The note in each panel gives the object name, the PSF component flux ratio, and the reduced 𝜒 2 of the fitting results, respectively. The up…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Redshift comparison between the redshifts from Grizli modeling and those from other projects for our candidates. For reference, the black dashed line represents an equal redshift. value from the best modeling results, and select seven candidates with H𝛽 and H𝛼 emission…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: CIGALE fitting results for one of our candidates, UDS-26875. The orange line represents the AGN component of this source. fluxes used in SED fitting were retrieved from Momcheva et al. (2016) results re-calibrated with previous catalogs spanning about 15 years of obse…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The rest-frame UV color comparison between our candidates (red dots), SDSS QSOs (orange stars), and Milliquas QSOs (green stars) in the 3D￾HST field. The black contour shows all the SDSS QSOs distribution given by SDSS photometry. The cyan square shows the source, whi…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The rest-frame UV and optical slope comparison between our candidates (red dots), SDSS QSOs (orange stars), and Milliquas QSOs (green stars) in the 3D-HST field. The black contour shows all the SDSS QSOs distribution calculated by SDSS and 2MASS photometry. The cyan s…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: QSOFITMORE fitting results of a G141 1D spectum. The black lines denote the total extracted spectrum, the yellow lines denote the continuum, the blue lines denote the total flux of different emission lines, and the red lines denote each Gaussian component. log(𝑀BH/𝑀⊙)…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: shows the comparison of our sample’s luminosity func￾tion with that of Shen et al. (2020) for similar redshifts. Our results are consistent with the extrapolated bolometric luminosity function of quasars at z ∼ 1.2-1.6. In the redshift range of 0.8–1.2, the luminos￾it…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Comparison of H𝛼 and [O III] 5007Å 2D emission line maps be￾tween QSOs and ELGs observed in G141 slitless spectroscopic data. Columns (left to right): F140W reference image with source name annotated in the up￾per right corner (angular and physical scales shown below)…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

141 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...

  2. [2]

    Ahumada R., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab929e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJS..249....3A 249, 3

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab929e 2020

  3. [3]

    Akiyama M., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/psv050 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015PASJ...67...82A 67, 82

    doi:10.1093/pasj/psv050 2015

  4. [4]

    Atek H., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/723/1/104 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...723..104A 723, 104

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/723/1/104 2010

  5. [5]

    B., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad2f31 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...965L...6B 965, L6

    Bagley M. B., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad2f31 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...965L...6B 965, L6

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad2f31 2024

  6. [6]

    G., Menzel D

    Baker J. G., Menzel D. H., 1938, @doi [ ] 10.1086/143959 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1938ApJ....88...52B 88, 52

    doi:10.1086/143959 1938

  7. [7]

    J., Cowie L

    Barger A. J., Cowie L. L., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/718/2/1235 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...718.1235B 718, 1235

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/718/2/1235 2010

  8. [8]

    Baron D., Stern J., Poznanski D., Netzer H., 2016, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/0004-637X/832/1/8 , 832, 8

    doi:10.3847/0004-637x/832/1/8 2016

Show all 141 references
  1. [9]

    Barro G., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad167e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...963..128B 963, 128

    2024 doi

  2. [10]

    Baskin A., Laor A., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08841.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.358.1043B 358, 1043

    2005

  3. [11]

    J., et al., 2024, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stae911 , 530, 894

    Battisti A. J., et al., 2024, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stae911 , 530, 894

    2024 doi

  4. [12]

    Beckwith S. V. W., et al., 2006, @doi [The Astronomical Journal] 10.1086/507302 , 132, 1729

    2006 doi

  5. [13]

    C., Peterson B

    Bentz M. C., Peterson B. M., Pogge R. W., Vestergaard M., Onken C. A., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/503537 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...644..133B 644, 133

    2006 doi

  6. [14]

    L., Watson M

    Birchall K. L., Watson M. G., Aird J., Starling R. L. C., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab3573 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.510.4556B 510, 4556

    2022 doi

  7. [15]

    Bischetti M., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629301 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...598A.122B 598, A122

    2017 doi

  8. [16]

    K., Salas H., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834156 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...622A.103B 622, A103

    Boquien M., Burgarella D., Roehlly Y., Buat V., Ciesla L., Corre D., Inoue A. K., Salas H., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834156 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...622A.103B 622, A103

    2019 doi

  9. [17]

    Brammer G., 2016, Reprocessing WFC3/IR Exposures Affected by Time-Variable Backgrounds , Instrument Science Report WFC3 2016-16, 12 pages

    2016

  10. [18]

    Brammer G., 2019, Grizli: Grism redshift and line analysis software , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1905.001 ( @eprint ascl 1905.001 )

    2019

  11. [19]

    B., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/200/2/13 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJS..200...13B 200, 13

    Brammer G. B., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/200/2/13 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJS..200...13B 200, 13

    2012 doi

  12. [20]

    Brammer G., Ryan R., Pirzkal N., 2015, Source-dependent master sky images for the WFC3/IR grisms , Instrument Science Report WFC3 2015-17, 18 pages

    2015

  13. [21]

    Brightman M., Nandra K., Salvato M., Hsu L.-T., Aird J., Rangel C., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1175 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.443.1999B 443, 1999

    2014 doi

  14. [22]

    Carniani S., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526557 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...580A.102C 580, A102

    2015 doi

  15. [23]

    A., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/adad69 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...981...96C 981, 96

    Chen N., Motohara K., Spitler L., Malkan M. A., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/adad69 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...981...96C 981, 96

    2025 doi

  16. [24]

    E., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/712/2/833 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...712..833C 712, 833

    Conroy C., Gunn J. E., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/712/2/833 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...712..833C 712, 833

    2010 doi

  17. [25]

    E., White M., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/486 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...699..486C 699, 486

    Conroy C., Gunn J. E., White M., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/486 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...699..486C 699, 486

    2009 doi

  18. [26]

    Corral A., Georgantopoulos I., Akylas A., Ranalli P., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833799 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...629A.133C 629, A133

    2019 doi

  19. [27]

    L., Barger A

    Cowie L. L., Barger A. J., Hu E. M., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/711/2/928 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...711..928C 711, 928

    2010 doi

  20. [28]

    arXiv:2306.06308

    DESI Collaboration et al., 2023, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2306.06308 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv230606308D p. arXiv:2306.06308

    2023 doi arXiv

  21. [29]

    DESI Collaboration et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ad3217 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024AJ....168...58D 168, 58

    2024 doi

  22. [30]

    arXiv:2503.14745

    DESI Collaboration et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2503.14745 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250314745D p. arXiv:2503.14745

    2025 doi arXiv

  23. [31]

    Davis M., et al., 2007, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/517931 , 660, L1

    2007 doi

  24. [32]

    Ding X., Silverman J., Birrer S., Treu T., Tang S., Yang L., Bottrell C., 2022, GaLight: 2D modeling of galaxy images , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2209.011

    2022

  25. [33]

    Y., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aab5ae , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....155..189D 155, 189

    Dong X. Y., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aab5ae , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....155..189D 155, 189

    2018 doi

  26. [34]

    3, WFC3 Instrument Handbook for Cycle 19 v

    Dressel L., 2010, in , Vol. 3, WFC3 Instrument Handbook for Cycle 19 v. 3.0. p. 3

    2010

  27. [35]

    Drozdovsky I., Yan L., Chen H.-W., Stern D., Kennicutt Robert J., Spinrad H., Dawson S., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/430884 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005AJ....130.1324D 130, 1324

    2005 doi

  28. [36]

    Du P., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/126 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...825..126D 825, 126

    2016 doi

  29. [37]

    Estrada-Carpenter V., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf22e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...870..133E 870, 133

    2019 doi

  30. [38]

    N., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2407.10799 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240710799E p

    Evans I. N., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2407.10799 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240710799E p. arXiv:2407.10799

    2024 doi arXiv

  31. [39]

    W., 2021, VizieR Online Data Catalog: The Million Quasars (Milliquas) catalogue, version 7.2 (Flesch, 2021) , VizieR On-line Data Catalog: VII/290

    Flesch E. W., 2021, VizieR Online Data Catalog: The Million Quasars (Milliquas) catalogue, version 7.2 (Flesch, 2021) , VizieR On-line Data Catalog: VII/290. Originally published in: 2015PASA...32...10F

    2021

  32. [40]

    H., 2001, Annals of statistics, pp 1189--1232

    Friedman J. H., 2001, Annals of statistics, pp 1189--1232

    2001

  33. [41]

    Fu Y., 2021, QSOFITMORE: a python package for fitting UV- optical spectra of quasars , @doi 10.5281/zenodo.5810042 , https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5810042

    2021 doi

  34. [42]

    Fu Y., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac7f3e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJS..261...32F 261, 32

    2022 doi

  35. [43]

    Gaia Collaboration et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243800 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...674A..39G 674, A39

    2023 doi

  36. [44]

    M., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx094 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.467..226G 467, 226

    Gaskell C. M., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx094 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.467..226G 467, 226

    2017 doi

  37. [45]

    Giavalisco M., et al., 2004, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/379232 , 600, L93

    2004 doi

  38. [46]

    Gonzaga S., Hack W., Fruchter A., Mack J., 2012, The DrizzlePac Handbook

    2012

  39. [47]

    F., Schmidt M., Liebert J., 1986, @doi [ ] 10.1086/191115 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986ApJS...61..305G 61, 305

    Green R. F., Schmidt M., Liebert J., 1986, @doi [ ] 10.1086/191115 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986ApJS...61..305G 61, 305

    1986 doi

  40. [48]

    E., Ho L

    Greene J. E., Ho L. C., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/431897 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...630..122G 630, 122

    2005 doi

  41. [49]

    E., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...964...39G 964, 39

    Greene J. E., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...964...39G 964, 39

    2024 doi

  42. [50]

    A., Malhotra S., Rhoads J., Cohen S., Hathi N., Windhorst R., Pirzkal N., 2007, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts

    Grogin N. A., Malhotra S., Rhoads J., Cohen S., Hathi N., Windhorst R., Pirzkal N., 2007, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts. p. 46.05

    2007

  43. [51]

    Guo H., Shen Y., Wang S., 2018, PyQSOFit: Python code to fit the spectrum of quasars , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1809.008

    2018

  44. [52]

    J., Groote D., Engels D., Reimers D., 1995, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995A&AS..111..195H 111, 195

    Hagen H. J., Groote D., Engels D., Reimers D., 1995, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995A&AS..111..195H 111, 195

    1995

  45. [53]

    J., Engels D., Reimers D., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1051/aas:1999442 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999A&AS..134..483H 134, 483

    Hagen H. J., Engels D., Reimers D., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1051/aas:1999442 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999A&AS..134..483H 134, 483

    1999 doi

  46. [54]

    Hao L., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/428485 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005AJ....129.1783H 129, 1783

    2005 doi

  47. [55]

    Harikane Y., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad029e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...959...39H 959, 39

    2023 doi

  48. [56]

    F., et al., 2004, @doi [The Astronomical Journal] 10.1086/423291 , 128, 1112

    Hopkins P. F., et al., 2004, @doi [The Astronomical Journal] 10.1086/423291 , 128, 1112

    2004 doi

  49. [57]

    Horne K., 1986, @doi [ ] 10.1086/131801 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986PASP...98..609H 98, 609

    1986 doi

  50. [58]

    Jin J.-J., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/acaf89 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJS..265...25J 265, 25

    2023 doi

  51. [59]

    Jones T., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/149/3/107 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015AJ....149..107J 149, 107

    2015 doi

  52. [60]

    arXiv:2312.03065

    Killi M., et al., 2023, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2312.03065 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv231203065K p. arXiv:2312.03065

    2023 doi

  53. [61]

    D., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ace5a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...954L...4K 954, L4

    Kocevski D. D., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ace5a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...954L...4K 954, L4

    2023 doi

  54. [62]

    D., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2404.03576 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240403576K p

    Kocevski D. D., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2404.03576 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240403576K p. arXiv:2404.03576

    2024 doi arXiv

  55. [63]

    M., et al., 2007, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.1086/520086 , 172, 196

    Koekemoer A. M., et al., 2007, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.1086/520086 , 172, 196

    2007 doi

  56. [64]

    M., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/36 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJS..197...36K 197, 36

    Koekemoer A. M., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/36 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJS..197...36K 197, 36

    2011 doi

  57. [65]

    arXiv:2306.07320

    Labbe I., et al., 2023, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2306.07320 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv230607320L p. arXiv:2306.07320

    2023 doi arXiv

  58. [66]

    J., Peterson B

    Landt H., Ward M. J., Peterson B. M., Bentz M. C., Elvis M., Korista K. T., Karovska M., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt421 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.432..113L 432, 113

    2013 doi

  59. [67]

    Liu C., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac6ba6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJS..261...24L 261, 24

    2022 doi

  60. [68]

    Lusso E., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117175 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...534A.110L 534, A110

    2011 doi

  61. [69]

    W., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aba623 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJS..250....8L 250, 8

    Lyke B. W., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aba623 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJS..250....8L 250, 8

    2020 doi

  62. [70]

    H., Rujopakarn W., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9e5d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...941..191L 941, 191

    Lyu J., Alberts S., Rieke G. H., Rujopakarn W., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9e5d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...941..191L 941, 191

    2022 doi

  63. [71]

    Maiolino R., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347640 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...691A.145M 691, A145

    2024 doi

  64. [72]

    D., Cioni M.-R

    Maitra C., Haberl F., Ivanov V. D., Cioni M.-R. L., van Loon J. T., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833663 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...622A..29M 622, A29

    2019 doi

  65. [73]

    Matthee J., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...963..129M 963, 129

    2024 doi

  66. [74]

    J., Dunlop J

    McLure R. J., Dunlop J. S., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08034.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.352.1390M 352, 1390

    2004

  67. [75]

    G., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0067-0049/225/2/27 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJS..225...27M 225, 27

    Momcheva I. G., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0067-0049/225/2/27 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJS..225...27M 225, 27

    2016 doi

  68. [76]

    A., Boquien M., Burgarella D., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141273 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...653A..70M 653, A70

    Mountrichas G., Buat V., Georgantopoulos I., Yang G., Masoura V. A., Boquien M., Burgarella D., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141273 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...653A..70M 653, A70

    2021 doi

  69. [77]

    A., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac71af , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...933..129M 933, 129

    Mowla L. A., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac71af , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...933..129M 933, 129

    2022 doi

  70. [78]

    R., Alexander D

    Mullaney J. R., Alexander D. M., Fine S., Goulding A. D., Harrison C. M., Hickox R. C., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt751 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.433..622M 433, 622

    2013 doi

  71. [79]

    Nanayakkara T., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/828/1/21 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...828...21N 828, 21

    2016 doi

  72. [80]

    Netzer H., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122302 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ARA&A..53..365N 53, 365

    2015 doi

  73. [81]

    A., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJS..208....5N 208, 5

    Newman J. A., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJS..208....5N 208, 5

    2013 doi

  74. [82]

    A., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/819/2/129 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...819..129O 819, 129

    Oesch P. A., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/819/2/129 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...819..129O 819, 129

    2016 doi

  75. [83]

    S., Smith M

    Osmer P. S., Smith M. G., 1976, @doi [ ] 10.1086/154827 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976ApJ...210..267O 210, 267

    1976 doi

  76. [84]

    S., Smith M

    Osmer P. S., Smith M. G., 1980, @doi [ ] 10.1086/190653 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1980ApJS...42..333O 42, 333

    1980 doi

  77. [85]

    Pang Y., Wu X.-B., Fu Y., Zhu R., Lyu B., Wang H., Feng X., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/adabdc , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...980..223P 980, 223

    2025 doi

  78. [86]

    Y., Ho L

    Peng C. Y., Ho L. C., Impey C. D., Rix H.-W., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/340952 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002AJ....124..266P 124, 266

    2002 doi

  79. [87]

    Y., Ho L

    Peng C. Y., Ho L. C., Impey C. D., Rix H.-W., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/139/6/2097 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AJ....139.2097P 139, 2097

    2010 doi

  80. [88]

    Pirzkal N., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/422582 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJS..154..501P 154, 501

    2004 doi

  81. [89]

    Pirzkal N., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/772/1/48 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...772...48P 772, 48

    2013 doi

  82. [90]

    Pirzkal N., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa81cc , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...846...84P 846, 84

    2017 doi

  83. [91]

    Planck Collaboration et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201323195 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...571A..11P 571, A11

    2014 doi

  84. [92]

    G., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629194 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...594A..72P 594, A72

    Pons E., Watson M. G., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629194 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...594A..72P 594, A72

    2016 doi

  85. [93]

    Pouliasis E., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1483 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.487.4285P 487, 4285

    2019 doi

  86. [94]

    T., et al., 2003, @doi [The Astronomical Journal] 10.1086/377014 , 126, 1131

    Richards G. T., et al., 2003, @doi [The Astronomical Journal] 10.1086/377014 , 126, 1131

    2003 doi

  87. [95]

    T., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/506525 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJS..166..470R 166, 470

    Richards G. T., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/506525 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJS..166..470R 166, 470

    2006 doi

  88. [96]

    Risaliti G., Marconi A., Maiolino R., Salvati M., Severgnini P., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20010276 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...371...37R 371, 37

    2001 doi

  89. [97]

    Roche N., Franzetti P., Garilli B., Zamorani G., Cimatti A., Rossetti E., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20173.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.420.1764R 420, 1764

    2012

  90. [98]

    Rossin C., Grange R., Caillat A., Costille A., Sanchez P., Ceria W., 2017, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series. p. 105634W, @doi 10.1117/12.2304070

    2017 doi

  91. [99]

    Ryan R. E. J., Casertano S., Pirzkal N., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/aaa53e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PASP..130c4501R 130, 034501

    2018 doi

  92. [100]

    Ryan R., et al., 2019, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019BAAS...51c.413R 51, 413

    2019

  93. [101]

    E., 2003, The Boosting Approach to Machine Learning: An Overview

    Schapire R. E., 2003, The Boosting Approach to Machine Learning: An Overview. Springer New York, New York, NY, pp 149--171, @doi 10.1007/978-0-387-21579-2_9 , https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21579-2_9

    2003 doi

  94. [102]

    Schmidt M., 1963, @doi [ ] 10.1038/1971040a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1963Natur.197.1040S 197, 1040

    1963 doi

  95. [103]

    P., Schmidt M., Gunn J

    Schneider D. P., Schmidt M., Gunn J. E., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/116937 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994AJ....107.1245S 107, 1245

    1994 doi

  96. [104]

    Schwarz G., 1978, Annals of Statistics, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978AnSta...6..461S 6, 461

    1978

  97. [105]

    C., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature13712 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014Natur.513..210S 513, 210

    Shen Y., Ho L. C., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature13712 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014Natur.513..210S 513, 210

    2014 doi

  98. [106]

    Shen Y., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/194/2/45 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJS..194...45S 194, 45

    2011 doi

  99. [107]

    Shen Y., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab074f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJS..241...34S 241, 34

    2019 doi

  100. [108]

    F., Faucher-Gigu \`e re C.-A., Alexander D

    Shen X., Hopkins P. F., Faucher-Gigu \`e re C.-A., Alexander D. M., Richards G. T., Ross N. P., Hickox R. C., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1381 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.495.3252S 495, 3252

    2020 doi

  101. [109]

    C., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/acc517 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJS..266...13S 266, 13

    Simons R. C., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/acc517 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJS..266...13S 266, 13

    2023 doi

  102. [110]

    E., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/24 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJS..214...24S 214, 24

    Skelton R. E., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/24 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJS..214...24S 214, 24

    2014 doi

  103. [111]

    Stern J., Laor A., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20901.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.423..600S 423, 600

    2012

  104. [112]

    W., Bunclark P

    Stoehr F., et al., 2008, in Argyle R. W., Bunclark P. S., Lewis J. R., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 394, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVII. p. 505

    2008

  105. [113]

    Stoica P., Selen Y., 2004, @doi [IEEE Signal Processing Magazine] 10.1109/MSP.2004.1311138 , 21, 36

    2004 arXiv

  106. [114]

    J., Zeippen C

    Storey P. J., Zeippen C. J., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03184.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000MNRAS.312..813S 312, 813

    2000

  107. [115]

    N., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/138/4/1022 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009AJ....138.1022S 138, 1022

    Straughn A. N., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/138/4/1022 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009AJ....138.1022S 138, 1022

    2009 doi

  108. [116]

    Syphers D., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/690/2/1181 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...690.1181S 690, 1181

    2009 doi

  109. [117]

    Toba Y., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab238d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJS..243...15T 243, 15

    2019 doi

  110. [118]

    Treu T., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/812/2/114 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...812..114T 812, 114

    2015 doi

  111. [119]

    E., et al., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/321167 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001AJ....122..549V 122, 549

    Vanden Berk D. E., et al., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/321167 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001AJ....122..549V 122, 549

    2001 doi

  112. [120]

    G., Kreidl T

    Vaucher B. G., Kreidl T. J., Thomas N. G., Hoag A. A., 1982, @doi [ ] 10.1086/160312 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1982ApJ...261...18V 261, 18

    1982 doi

  113. [121]

    M., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/500572 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...641..689V 641, 689

    Vestergaard M., Peterson B. M., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/500572 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...641..689V 641, 689

    2006 doi

  114. [122]

    Wang S., Chen X., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1c61 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...877..116W 877, 116

    2019 doi

  115. [123]

    Wang X., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa603c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...837...89W 837, 89

    2017 doi

  116. [124]

    Wang X., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3861 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...882...94W 882, 94

    2019 doi

  117. [125]

    S., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1419 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.514.1595W 514, 1595

    Wang Y., Shang Z., Brotherton M. S., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1419 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.514.1595W 514, 1595

    2022 doi

  118. [126]

    K., Lee C.-C., Carswell R

    Webb J. K., Lee C.-C., Carswell R. F., Milakovi \'c D., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3551 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.501.2268W 501, 2268

    2021 doi

  119. [127]

    C., Draine B

    Weingartner J. C., Draine B. T., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/318651 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...548..296W 548, 296

    2001 doi

  120. [128]

    E., Pope A., Cybulski R., Casey C

    Whitaker K. E., Pope A., Cybulski R., Casey C. M., Popping G., Yun M. S., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa94ce , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...850..208W 850, 208

    2017 doi

  121. [129]

    Wisotzki L., Koehler T., Groote D., Reimers D., 1996, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996A&AS..115..227W 115, 227

    1996

  122. [130]

    Wisotzki L., Christlieb N., Bade N., Beckmann V., K \"o hler T., Vanelle C., Reimers D., 2000, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&A...358...77W 358, 77

    2000

  123. [131]

    Woo J.-H., Bae H.-J., Son D., Karouzos M., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/817/2/108 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...817..108W 817, 108

    2016 doi

  124. [132]

    B., Wang R., Kong M

    Wu X. B., Wang R., Kong M. Z., Liu F. K., Han J. L., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20035845 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004A&A...424..793W 424, 793

    2004 doi

  125. [133]

    Yamashita T., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aae1ac , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...866..140Y 866, 140

    2018 doi

  126. [134]

    Yang G., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4971 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...927..192Y 927, 192

    2022 doi

  127. [135]

    Yang J., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acc9c8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...951L...5Y 951, L5

    2023 doi

  128. [136]

    W., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/422429 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004AJ....128..585Y 128, 585

    Yip C. W., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/422429 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004AJ....128..585Y 128, 585

    2004 doi

  129. [137]

    G., et al., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/301513 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000AJ....120.1579Y 120, 1579

    York D. G., et al., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/301513 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000AJ....120.1579Y 120, 1579

    2000 doi

  130. [138]

    Yuan H., Zhang H., Zhang Y., Lei Y., Dong Y., Zhao Y., 2018, ASERA: A Spectrum Eye Recognition Assistant ( @eprint ascl 1804.001 )

    2018

  131. [139]

    Zhan H., 2011, @doi [SCIENTIA SINICA Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica] https://doi.org/10.1360/132011-961 , 41, 1441

    2011 doi

  132. [140]

    Zhan H., 2021, @doi [Chinese Science Bulletin] https://doi.org/10.1360/TB-2021-0016 , 66, 1290

    2021 doi

  133. [141]

    S., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac5b66 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJS..261....7D 261, 7

    den Brok J. S., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac5b66 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJS..261....7D 261, 7

    2022 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.