Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 73 references

An Electrically Injected and Solid State Surface Acoustic Wave Phonon Laser

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A single-chip surface acoustic wave phonon laser, DC-pumped through the acoustoelectric effect, self-oscillates at 1 GHz with a resolution-limited linewidth below 77 Hz and -6.1 dBm of on-chip acoustic power.

desk verdict First electrically injected solid-state SAW phonon laser; core claim likely correct, but acoustic identity and fitted parameters deserve scrutiny. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.14385 v2 pith:WHDML2GB submitted 2025-05-20 physics.app-ph

Alexander Wendt , Matthew J. Storey , Michael Miller , Dalton Anderson , Eric Chatterjee , William Horrocks , Brandon Smith , Lisa Hackett
show 1 more author
Matt Eichenfield
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.app-ph PACS 43.35.Pt72.50.+b
keywords phononlasersurfaceacousticwaveacoustoelectriceffectlithiumniobateindiumgalliumarsenideself-oscillationlinewidthnarrowing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports the first electrically injected, all-solid-state surface acoustic wave (SAW) phonon laser: a single lithium niobate resonator with an internal indium gallium arsenide film that amplifies acoustic waves by the acoustoelectric effect. Below a 36 V bias the device works as a resonant amplifier; above threshold its thermally occupied phonon modes achieve round-trip gain and self-oscillate. The measured output is a coherent ~1 GHz tone with a resolution-limited linewidth below 77 Hz, -6.1 dBm of on-chip acoustic power, and a 55.4 kHz/V frequency tuning rate, with no external RF source required. A sympathetic reader would care because this replaces the external RF electronics or optical pumps that SAW sources usually need, pointing toward compact DC-driven acoustic sources for sensing, RF signal processing, and quantum phononics.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing element is the acoustoelectric effect in a high-mobility In0.53Ga0.47As film integrated into a SAW Fabry-Perot cavity. A DC bias gives the electron gas a finite average momentum, creating a population inversion for phonons traveling with the drift direction while counter-propagating phonons stay absorbing; because gain and loss peak at different biases, there is a bias at which forward gain exceeds backward loss. The classical gain expression (Eq. 1) captures this as a function of drift velocity, dielectric relaxation frequency, diffusion, and effective electromechanical coupling, and it is used to model threshold, Q, and phase noise. The resonator's metallic distributed Bragg reflectors confine the quasi-shear-horizontal mode near 1 GHz with a passive Q of 813, which the acoustoelectric interaction both amplifies and, through backward loss, degrades to an effective Q of 96 in the lasing state.

What would settle it

Directly image or probe the mechanical displacement of the surface while the device is biased above threshold, for example with an optical interferometer or stroboscopic X-ray: a genuine phonon laser must show a standing acoustic wave at a resonator mode whose frequency spacing matches the measured ~5.1 MHz free spectral range and whose amplitude tracks the electrical output, whereas an electrical parasitic would show no such mechanical displacement.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a completely solid-state, single-chip SAW phonon laser can be built by putting a DC-biased semiconductor gain medium inside an acoustic resonator. The device is a Fabry-Perot cavity formed by distributed Bragg reflectors in thin-film lithium niobate on silicon, with a 50 nm In0.53Ga0.47As layer as the gain medium. A DC drift field shifts the electron momentum distribution so that forward-propagating phonons experience net stimulated emission while backward-propagating phonons remain lossy; at 36 V this gain overcomes all round-trip losses, and the device self-oscillates. The authors observe a clear threshold, linewidth narrowing from about 1 MHz to below 77 Hz, -6.1 dBm of on-chip acoustic power at about 1 GHz, 19.6 dB end-to-end RF gain and a 108% Q enhancement below threshold, and a 55.4 kHz/V bias tuning rate, consistent with an acoustoelectric origin.

Load-bearing premise

The self-oscillation is genuinely acoustic, meaning a mechanical mode of the resonator amplified by the biased semiconductor rather than an electrical current oscillation or parasitic electromagnetic feedback.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Above threshold, the device is a self-sustained coherent acoustic oscillator that needs only a DC supply, so it can serve as an on-chip SAW source or local oscillator without external RF electronics.
  • A ring-resonator variant that eliminates backward-propagating acoustoelectric loss should recover the passive Q (813 rather than 96), cut the threshold bias by roughly an order of magnitude, and improve phase noise by about 27.8 dB.
  • The same gain physics scales in model: with high-coupling X-cut lithium niobate plates and ring topologies, net round-trip gain is predicted past 70 GHz, far beyond the electrode limits of IDT-based generation.
  • Replacing the semiconductor film by a two-dimensional electron gas at cryogenic temperatures should yield mHz-class linewidths, making the device a candidate pump for quantum acoustic circuits.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the same device operated below threshold is already a compact resonant acoustoelectric amplifier; that mode of operation could be exploited independently for on-chip signal processing.
  • The pronounced linewidth narrowing and threshold behavior invite a direct coherence test, for example measuring the second-order correlation of the acoustic output, which would reveal whether the emitted phonon field has the quantum statistics expected of a laser-like source.
  • The observed 55 kHz/V frequency tuning suggests that with a feedback loop the SAW-PL could be locked as a voltage-controlled acoustic oscillator, a natural path toward an all-acoustic frequency reference.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports a surface acoustic wave phonon laser (SAW-PL) in which an acoustoelectric amplifier formed by a 50-nm In0.53Ga0.47As film heterogeneously integrated on Y-cut lithium niobate is embedded inside a Fabry-Perot SAW resonator. Below a threshold bias of about 36 V the device behaves as a resonant acoustoelectric amplifier with 19.6 dB end-to-end RF gain; above threshold the authors observe self-sustained oscillation near 999 MHz, linewidth narrowing from ~1 MHz to 77 Hz in a 20 ms window, an inferred on-chip acoustic output power of -6.1 dBm, a 55.4 kHz/V bias tuning rate, and harmonics at exact multiples of the fundamental. The paper argues this is the first completely solid-state, electrically injected SAW phonon laser and uses a Kino-Reeder acoustoelectric model plus FEM to discuss scaling, linewidth, phase noise, and applications.

Significance. If the acoustic-origin claim holds, this is a significant milestone: it replaces an external RF source and IDT transduction with a DC-driven on-chip gain medium, which could matter for compact SAW sensors, acousto-optic modulators, and all-acoustic RF front ends. The paper has real strengths: the threshold kink, the 108% Q enhancement, the linewidth narrowing, the mode spacing, and the harmonic structure are direct, independently measured signatures of self-oscillation; the supplementary notes are candid about jitter and about the absence of Hall data; the IDT insertion-loss calibration via delay lines is careful. However, the central claim that the self-oscillation is acoustic rests on electrical IDT measurements only, and the quantitative acoustoelectric model contains parameter-extraction inconsistencies that the authors explicitly acknowledge. The demonstrated device is noteworthy even with these caveats, but the acoustic identity of the lasing mode and the model-based quantitative claims need to be secured before the strongest statements can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III, Fig. 3; Supp. D] Every post-threshold observable is an electrical measurement at an IDT: threshold power, linewidth narrowing, Q enhancement, harmonics, and bias tuning. These are necessary but not sufficient to identify the self-oscillation as a surface acoustic wave; a DC-biased semiconductor/IDT/probe arrangement can in principle produce a narrow-line electrical oscillation through negative differential resistance or parasitic electromagnetic feedback without mechanical motion at 999 MHz. Since the novelty claim depends on acoustic origin, the paper should either report an independent mechanical measurement (surface displacement interferometry, stroboscopic imaging, or an acoustic time-of-flight test) or, at minimum, provide a targeted control that excludes the electrical feedback path, such as demonstrating that oscillation disappears when the DBRs are replaced by non-reflective terminations or when the semiconductor layer is removed. As written, the acoustic identity is inferred rather than directly established.
  2. [Supp. Note F] The three parameter-extraction routes for mobility and carrier density are mutually inconsistent: the threshold-voltage analysis gives µ ≈ 4000 cm2/Vs and N ≈ 4×10^15 cm^-3; the sub-threshold resonant amplifier fit gives µ ≈ 1000 cm2/Vs and N ≈ 1.5×10^15 cm^-3; and the phase-tuning analysis gives N ≈ 4×10^16 cm^-3 with µ = 4000 cm2/Vs. The predicted tuning rate of 291 kHz/V disagrees with the measured 55.4 +/- 0.6 kHz/V, and the paper explains the discrepancy by invoking an unspecified saturation mechanism. These inconsistencies do not invalidate the observed threshold and linewidth narrowing, but they undermine the quantitative claims that depend on the model, including the 36.3 dB on-chip gain estimate, the effective Q = 96 used in the Leeson fit, and the projected phase-noise improvements. The authors should either resolve the parameter conflicts with a direct Hall measurement, present the model numbers as broad estimates with uncertainties, or substantially temper the quantitative conclusions.
  3. [Sec. III and Supp. Note E] The headline linewidth of 77 Hz is obtained from a selected 20 ms stable window, while the center frequency jitters by roughly 750 Hz over the full 200 ms record and the frequency-noise integration shows a linewidth that grows with integration time. The abstract and Discussion state 'resolution-limited linewidth of <77 Hz' and 'narrow intrinsic linewidth of at most 77 Hz,' which conflates the resolution-limited instantaneous linewidth with a device property. The paper should report the jitter explicitly in the abstract and Discussion, and should either separate environmental jitter from the intrinsic linewidth through a noise model or present the linewidth as a function of integration time rather than as a single 'at most' value.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. III, Fig. 3d] The text says 'shown in Fig. 2d' when presenting the linewidth and output power data; the reference should be to Fig. 3d.
  2. [Sec. IV and Methods] The text refers to 'Fig. 4g' for the FEM racetrack model and to 'Fig. 3g' for the broad-spectrum measurement; the correct figure labels are Fig. 4e and Fig. 3h, respectively.
  3. [Methods and Supp. Note F] The Methods section states a target silicon doping of 5×10^15 cm^-3, while Supp. Note F says the targeted value is 1×10^16 cm^-3; this discrepancy should be reconciled.
  4. [Sec. III, Eq. (3); Supp. Note E, Eq. (16)] Leeson's formula as printed has a mismatched parenthesis: 'log10[ F kBT/2P0 ((f0/2Qeff fm + 1)^2(fc/fm + 1)]' needs an extra closing parenthesis after the squared term.
  5. [Sec. III and Conclusion] The text says the threshold power is approximately 30.3 mW, while Fig. 3b and the operating description use bias powers around 33.9 mW; the threshold extraction criterion should be stated so these numbers are consistent.
  6. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption contains the artifact 'E/zero.denominator' in the second and fourth schematic labels; these should be replaced by the intended mathematical notation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: lasing threshold, linewidth narrowing, and Q enhancement are direct measurements; fitted acoustoelectric parameters and prior-work noise figure support interpretation and extrapolation but do not force the central claim.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, self-sustained oscillation above a 36 V threshold with linewidth collapse from about 1.2 MHz to 77 Hz and -6.1 dBm output, rests on direct VNA, oscilloscope, and ESA measurements in Section III (Figs. 2 and 3), not on any fitted model. The Kino-Reeder acoustoelectric expressions (Eqs. 1-2) are used to interpret the measured gain and to extract mobility and carrier density in Supplemental Note F, where the paper explicitly states, "we fit the available data to our models to make the best estimate of the parameters." These are admitted fits rather than independent validations. The 291 kHz/V tuning-rate estimate is a genuine cross-prediction from a threshold-derived carrier density; it is not forced because it disagrees with the measured 55.4 kHz/V, and the paper attributes the discrepancy to an unknown saturation mechanism. The use of the authors' prior work for the amplifier noise figure (F=2, reference [50]) and for expected film properties is a parameter transfer from similar devices, not evidence that the present device oscillates, so it is not load-bearing for the lasing claim. The main non-circularity concerns are evidentiary rather than derivation-circular: the acoustic identity of the oscillation is inferred from electrical IDT spectra rather than a direct displacement or time-of-flight measurement, and the three parameter-extraction routes in Note F yield inconsistent mobility and carrier-density values. These are correctness and validation risks, not reductions of the central claim to its own inputs, so the circularity score remains low.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central experimental demonstration does not require new physical entities, but the quantitative modeling rests on fitted carrier parameters and on standard acoustoelectric theory.

free parameters (3)
  • carrier mobility (mu) = 1000-4000 cm^2/Vs (three estimates)
    Hall devices unusable; fitted to threshold voltage, frequency tuning, and sub-threshold amplifier response (Supp. Note F).
  • carrier density (N) = 1.5e15 to 4e16 cm^-3 depending on fit
    Same fitting; used in gain model Eqs. (1)-(2) and scaling projections.
  • flicker corner frequency (fc) = 50 kHz
    Fitted to phase noise data via Leeson's formula (Fig. 3e).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Kino-Reeder/Coldren drift-diffusion acoustoelectric model (Eqs. S1-S13) is valid for the InGaAs-on-LN heterostructure
    Invoked in Sec. II and Supp. Note B; underlies gain/loss calculations including the threshold condition.
  • domain assumption The signal transduced by the IDT above threshold is acoustic power from the SAW resonator, not an electrical oscillation in the bias/readout circuit
    Interpretation of the self-oscillation as a phonon laser; supported by resonator mode spacing and Q enhancement but no direct acoustic imaging.
  • domain assumption Absolute acoustic power calibration via IDT insertion-loss and aperture-overlap corrections is accurate
    Used to convert measured RF power to on-chip acoustic power (-6.1 dBm); aperture overlap is estimated as 1/3 with plane-wave assumption (Supp. Note D).
  • domain assumption High-frequency scaling assumes X-cut LN plates with similar F-Q products as ref. [59] and k2 > 40%
    Used for projections past 70 GHz (Sec. IV, Fig. 4f); not experimentally validated here.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of An Electrically Injected and Solid State Surface Acoustic Wave Phonon Laser." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WHDML2GB

@misc{pith2026250514385,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: An Electrically Injected and Solid State Surface Acoustic Wave Phonon Laser},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WHDML2GB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.14385}
}
abstract

Surface acoustic waves (SAWs) enable a wide array of technologies including RF filters, chemical and biological sensors, acousto-optic devices, acoustic control of microfluidic flow in lab-on-a-chip systems, and quantum phononics. While numerous methods exist for generating SAWs, they each have intrinsic limitations that inhibit performance, operation at high frequencies, and use in systems constrained in size, weight, and power. Here, for the first time, we present a completely solid-state, single-chip SAW phonon laser that is comprised of a lithium niobate SAW resonator with an internal, DC electrically injected and broadband semiconductor gain medium with $<$0.15 mm$^2$ footprint. Below the threshold bias of 36 V, the device behaves as a resonant amplifier, and above it exhibits self-sustained coherent oscillation, linewidth narrowing, and high output powers. A continuous on-chip acoustic output power of up to -6.1 dBm is generated at 1 GHz with a resolution-limited linewidth of $<$77 Hz and a carrier phase noise of -57 dBc/Hz at 1 kHz offset. Through detailed modeling, we show pathways for improving these devices' performance including mHz linewidths, sub -100 dBc/Hz phase noise at 1 kHz, high power efficiency, footprints less than 550 um$^2$ at 10 GHz, and SAW generation approaching the hundreds of GHz regime. This demonstration provides a fundamentally new approach to SAW generation, paving the way toward ultra-high-frequency SAW sources on a chip and highly miniaturized and efficient SAW-based systems that can be operated without an external RF source.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.14385 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. a. The S-parameters of one such resonator (more details in the methods section), are shown in Fig. 2bi. There are resonance peaks in the transmission spectrum (S21) that correspond to dips in the reflection spectrum (S11) with spacings of ∆¿FSR = 5.1 ± 0.04 MHz. Figure 2bii shows the transmission peak at 984 MHz in greater detail, which we find has a full-width half-max (FWHM) of ∆¿ = 1.20 ± 0.01 MHz, corresponding … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Stimulated emission and absorption diagrams. Circles re [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_1.png]
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. a) Increasing the carrier density increases the radius of t [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png]
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. FEM simulation of the acoustic DBRs with 25 periods. a) R [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. a) Delay line measurement before and after time gating. Not [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Estimating semiconductor parameters using the peaks o [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Morgan, Surface acoustic wave filters: With applica- tions to electronic communications and signal processing

    D. Morgan, Surface acoustic wave filters: With applica- tions to electronic communications and signal processing . Academic Press, 2010

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    Hashimoto and K.-Y

    K.-y. Hashimoto and K.-Y. Hashimoto, Surface acoustic wave devices in telecommunications , vol. 116. Springer, 2000

    work page 2000

  3. [3]

    Surface acoustic wave (saw) sensors: Physics, materials, and applications,

    D. Mandal and S. Banerjee, “Surface acoustic wave (saw) sensors: Physics, materials, and applications,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 3, p. 820, 2022

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Harnessing exceptional points for ultrahigh sensitive acoustic wave sensing,

    X. Lu, Y. Yuan, F. Chen, X. Hou, Y. Guo, L. Reindl, Y. Fu, W. Luo, and D. Zhao, “Harnessing exceptional points for ultrahigh sensitive acoustic wave sensing,” Mi- crosystems & Nanoengineering , vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2025

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Exchange bi- ased surface acoustic wave magnetic field sensors,

    V. Schell, E. Spetzler, N. Wolff, L. Bumke, L. Kienle, J. McCord, E. Quandt, and D. Meyners, “Exchange bi- ased surface acoustic wave magnetic field sensors,” Sci- entific Reports , vol. 13, no. 1, p. 8446, 2023

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Ultrahigh- frequency surface acoustic wave sensors with giant mass- loading effects on electrodes,

    Z. Chen, J. Zhou, H. Tang, Y. Liu, Y. Shen, X. Yin, J. Zheng, H. Zhang, J. Wu, X. Shi, et al. , “Ultrahigh- frequency surface acoustic wave sensors with giant mass- loading effects on electrodes,” ACS sensors , vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1657–1664, 2020

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Advances in sensing mechanisms and micro/nanostructured sensing layers for surface acoustic wave-based gas sensors,

    X. Li, W. Sun, W. Fu, H. Lv, X. Zu, Y. Guo, D. Gib- son, and Y.-Q. Fu, “Advances in sensing mechanisms and micro/nanostructured sensing layers for surface acoustic wave-based gas sensors,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 11, no. 17, pp. 9216–9238, 2023

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Ultra-high-frequency (uhf) surface-acoustic-wave (saw) microfluidics and biosensors,

    M. Agostini and M. Cecchini, “Ultra-high-frequency (uhf) surface-acoustic-wave (saw) microfluidics and biosensors,” Nanotechnology, vol. 32, no. 31, p. 312001, 2021

    work page 2021

Show all 73 references
  1. [9]

    Ultra-high- frequency love surface acoustic wave device for real-time sensing applications,

    G. Greco, M. Agostini, and M. Cecchini, “Ultra-high- frequency love surface acoustic wave device for real-time sensing applications,” Ieee Access, vol. 8, pp. 112507– 112514, 2020

    2020

  2. [10]

    Harmonic acoustics for dynamic and selective particle manipula- tion,

    S. Yang, Z. Tian, Z. Wang, J. Rufo, P. Li, J. Mai, J. Xia, H. Bachman, P.-H. Huang, M. Wu, et al. , “Harmonic acoustics for dynamic and selective particle manipula- tion,” Nature materials, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 540–546, 2022

    2022

  3. [11]

    Surface acoustic wave microfluidics,

    X. Ding, P. Li, S.-C. S. Lin, Z. S. Stratton, N. Nama, F. Guo, D. Slotcavage, X. Mao, J. Shi, F. Costanzo, et al., “Surface acoustic wave microfluidics,” Lab on a Chip , vol. 13, no. 18, pp. 3626–3649, 2013

    2013

  4. [12]

    Acoustic valves in microfluidic channels for droplet ma- nipulation,

    X. Qin, X. Wei, L. Li, H. Wang, Z. Jiang, and D. Sun, “Acoustic valves in microfluidic channels for droplet ma- nipulation,” Lab on a Chip , vol. 21, no. 16, pp. 3165– 3173, 2021

    2021

  5. [13]

    Topological acoustofluidics,

    S. Zhao, Z. Tian, C. Shen, S. Yang, J. Xia, T. Li, Z. Xie, P. Zhang, L. P. Lee, S. A. Cummer, et al. , “Topological acoustofluidics,” Nature Materials , pp. 1–9, 2025

    2025

  6. [14]

    Acoustic separation of circulating tumor cells,

    P. Li, Z. Mao, Z. Peng, L. Zhou, Y. Chen, P.-H. Huang, C. I. Truica, J. J. Drabick, W. S. El-Deiry, M. Dao, et al., “Acoustic separation of circulating tumor cells,” Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences , vol. 112, no. 16, pp. 4970–4975, 2015

    2015

  7. [15]

    Hybrid circuit cavity quantum electrodynamics with a micromechanical resonator,

    J.-M. Pirkkalainen, S. Cho, J. Li, G. Paraoanu, P. Hako- nen, and M. Sillanp¨ a¨ a, “Hybrid circuit cavity quantum electrodynamics with a micromechanical resonator,” Na- ture, vol. 494, no. 7436, pp. 211–215, 2013

    2013

  8. [16]

    Propagating phonons coupled to an artificial atom,

    M. V. Gustafsson, T. Aref, A. F. Kockum, M. K. Ekstr¨ om, G. Johansson, and P. Delsing, “Propagating phonons coupled to an artificial atom,” Science, vol. 346, no. 6206, pp. 207–211, 2014

    2014

  9. [17]

    Spin–phonon interac- tions in silicon carbide addressed by gaussian acoustics,

    S. J. Whiteley, G. Wolfowicz, C. P. Anderson, A. Bourassa, H. Ma, M. Ye, G. Koolstra, K. J. Satzinger, M. V. Holt, F. J. Heremans, et al., “Spin–phonon interac- tions in silicon carbide addressed by gaussian acoustics,” Nature Physics , vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 490–495, 2019

    2019

  10. [18]

    Coherent acoustic control of a single sil- icon vacancy spin in diamond,

    S. Maity, L. Shao, S. Bogdanovi´ c, S. Meesala, Y.-I. 9 Sohn, N. Sinclair, B. Pingault, M. Chalupnik, C. Chia, L. Zheng, et al., “Coherent acoustic control of a single sil- icon vacancy spin in diamond,” Nature communications, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 193, 2020

    2020

  11. [19]

    Circuit quantum acoustodynamics with surface acous- tic waves,

    R. Manenti, A. F. Kockum, A. Patterson, T. Behrle, J. Rahamim, G. Tancredi, F. Nori, and P. J. Leek, “Circuit quantum acoustodynamics with surface acous- tic waves,” Nature communications, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 975, 2017

    2017

  12. [20]

    Universal quantum transducers based on surface acoustic waves,

    M. J. Sch¨ utz and M. J. Sch¨ utz, “Universal quantum transducers based on surface acoustic waves,” Quantum dots for quantum information processing: controlling and exploiting the quantum dot environment , pp. 143–196, 2017

    2017

  13. [21]

    Large single-phonon op- tomechanical coupling between quantum dots and tightly confined surface acoustic waves in the quantum regime,

    R. A. DeCrescent, Z. Wang, P. Imany, R. C. Boutelle, C. A. McDonald, T. Autry, J. D. Teufel, S. W. Nam, R. P. Mirin, and K. L. Silverman, “Large single-phonon op- tomechanical coupling between quantum dots and tightly confined surface acoustic waves in the quantum regime,” Phys...

    2022

  14. [22]

    Electrically inter- faced brillouin-active waveguide for microwave photonic measurements,

    Y. Zhou, F. Ruesink, M. Pavlovich, R. Behunin, H. Cheng, S. Gertler, A. L. Starbuck, A. J. Leenheer, A. T. Pomerene, D. C. Trotter, et al. , “Electrically inter- faced brillouin-active waveguide for microwave photonic measurements,” Nature Communications, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 6796, 2024

    2024

  15. [23]

    Resolving the energy levels of a nanomechanical oscillator,

    P. Arrangoiz-Arriola, E. A. Wollack, Z. Wang, M. Pechal, W. Jiang, T. P. McKenna, J. D. Witmer, R. Van Laer, and A. H. Safavi-Naeini, “Resolving the energy levels of a nanomechanical oscillator,” Nature, vol. 571, no. 7766, pp. 537–540, 2019

    2019

  16. [24]

    Resolving phonon fock states in a multimode cavity with a double-slit qubit,

    L. R. Sletten, B. A. Moores, J. J. Viennot, and K. W. Lehnert, “Resolving phonon fock states in a multimode cavity with a double-slit qubit,” Physical Review X , vol. 9, no. 2, p. 021056, 2019

    2019

  17. [25]

    Splitting phonons: Building a plat- form for linear mechanical quantum computing,

    H. Qiao, ´E. Dumur, G. Andersson, H. Yan, M.-H. Chou, J. Grebel, C. R. Conner, Y. J. Joshi, J. M. Miller, R. G. Povey, et al. , “Splitting phonons: Building a plat- form for linear mechanical quantum computing,” Sci- ence, vol. 380, no. 6649, pp. 1030–1033, 2023

    2023

  18. [26]

    Acoustic phonon phase gates with number-resolving phonon detection,

    H. Qiao, Z. Wang, G. Andersson, A. Anferov, C. R. Con- ner, Y. J. Joshi, S. Li, J. M. Miller, X. Wu, H. Yan, et al. , “Acoustic phonon phase gates with number-resolving phonon detection,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.03898 , 2025

    2025 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Control of coherent information via on- chip photonic–phononic emitter–receivers,

    H. Shin, J. A. Cox, R. Jarecki, A. Starbuck, Z. Wang, and P. T. Rakich, “Control of coherent information via on- chip photonic–phononic emitter–receivers,” Nature com- munications, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 6427, 2015

    2015

  20. [28]

    Nonreciprocal dissipa- tion engineering via strong coupling with a continuum of modes,

    Y. Zhou, F. Ruesink, S. Gertler, H. Cheng, M. Pavlovich, E. Kittlaus, A. L. Starbuck, A. J. Leenheer, A. T. Pomerene, D. C. Trotter, et al. , “Nonreciprocal dissipa- tion engineering via strong coupling with a continuum of modes,” Physical Review X , vol. 14, no. 2, p. 021002, 2024

    2024

  21. [29]

    Gigahertz-frequency, acousto-optic phase modulation of visible light in a cmos-fabricated photonic circuit,

    J. M. Freedman, M. J. Storey, D. Dominguez, A. Leen- heer, S. Magri, N. T. Otterstrom, and M. Eichenfield, “Gigahertz-frequency, acousto-optic phase modulation of visible light in a cmos-fabricated photonic circuit,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.08012 , 2025

    2025 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Microwave-to-optical conversion using lithium niobate thin-film acoustic resonators,

    L. Shao, M. Yu, S. Maity, N. Sinclair, L. Zheng, C. Chia, A. Shams-Ansari, C. Wang, M. Zhang, K. Lai, et al. , “Microwave-to-optical conversion using lithium niobate thin-film acoustic resonators,” Optica, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 1498–1505, 2019

    2019

  23. [31]

    Efficient and wideband acousto-optic modulation on thin-film lithium niobate for microwave- to-photonic conversion,

    A. E. Hassanien, S. Link, Y. Yang, E. Chow, L. L. God- dard, and S. Gong, “Efficient and wideband acousto-optic modulation on thin-film lithium niobate for microwave- to-photonic conversion,” Photonics Research , vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 1182–1190, 2021

    2021

  24. [32]

    Electrically driven acousto-optics and broadband non-reciprocity in silicon photonics,

    E. A. Kittlaus, W. M. Jones, P. T. Rakich, N. T. Ot- terstrom, R. E. Muller, and M. Rais-Zadeh, “Electrically driven acousto-optics and broadband non-reciprocity in silicon photonics,” Nature Photonics , vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 43–52, 2021

    2021

  25. [33]

    Frequency–angular resolving lidar using chip-scale acousto-optic beam steering,

    B. Li, Q. Lin, and M. Li, “Frequency–angular resolving lidar using chip-scale acousto-optic beam steering,” Na- ture, vol. 620, no. 7973, pp. 316–322, 2023

    2023

  26. [34]

    Optical multi-beam steering and communication using integrated acousto-optics arrays,

    Q. Lin, S. Fang, Y. Yu, Z. Xi, L. Shao, B. Li, and M. Li, “Optical multi-beam steering and communication using integrated acousto-optics arrays,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.16511, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Enabling scalable optical computing in synthetic frequency dimension us- ing integrated cavity acousto-optics,

    H. Zhao, B. Li, H. Li, and M. Li, “Enabling scalable optical computing in synthetic frequency dimension us- ing integrated cavity acousto-optics,” Nature Communi- cations, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 5426, 2022

    2022

  28. [36]

    A phononic interface between a superconducting quantum processor and quan- tum networked spin memories,

    T. Neuman, M. Eichenfield, M. E. Trusheim, L. Hack- ett, P. Narang, and D. Englund, “A phononic interface between a superconducting quantum processor and quan- tum networked spin memories,” npj Quantum Informa- tion, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 121, 2021

    2021

  29. [37]

    A novel gan-based monolithic saw/hemt oscillator on silicon,

    X. Lu, J. Ma, X. L. Zhu, C. M. Lee, C. P. Yue, and K. M. Lau, “A novel gan-based monolithic saw/hemt oscillator on silicon,” in 2012 IEEE International Ultrasonics Sym- posium, pp. 2206–2209, IEEE, 2012

    2012

  30. [38]

    16.8 1ghz gan-mmic monolithically integrated mems-based oscilla- tors,

    B. W. Bahr, L. C. Popa, and D. Weinstein, “16.8 1ghz gan-mmic monolithically integrated mems-based oscilla- tors,” in 2015 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference-(ISSCC) Digest of Technical Papers , pp. 1– 3, IEEE, 2015

    2015

  31. [39]

    Low-phase-noise surface-acoustic-wave oscillator using an edge mode of a phononic band gap,

    Z. Xi, J. G. Thomas, J. Ji, D. Wang, Z. Cen, I. I. Kravchenko, B. R. Srijanto, Y. Yao, Y. Zhu, and L. Shao, “Low-phase-noise surface-acoustic-wave oscillator using an edge mode of a phononic band gap,” Physical Review Applied, vol. 23, no. 2, p. 024054, 2025

    2025

  32. [40]

    A phonon laser,

    K. Vahala, M. Herrmann, S. Kn¨ unz, V. Batteiger, G. Saathoff, T. H¨ ansch, and T. Udem, “A phonon laser,” Nature Physics , vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 682–686, 2009

    2009

  33. [41]

    Phonon laser action in a tunable two-level system,

    I. S. Grudinin, H. Lee, O. Painter, and K. J. Vahala, “Phonon laser action in a tunable two-level system,” Physical review letters , vol. 104, no. 8, p. 083901, 2010

    2010

  34. [42]

    A phonon laser operating at an exceptional point,

    J. Zhang, B. Peng, S ¸. K. ¨Ozdemir, K. Pichler, D. O. Krimer, G. Zhao, F. Nori, Y.-x. Liu, S. Rotter, and L. Yang, “A phonon laser operating at an exceptional point,” Nature Photonics , vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 479–484, 2018

    2018

  35. [43]

    An optical tweezer phonon laser,

    R. M. Pettit, W. Ge, P. Kumar, D. R. Luntz-Martin, J. T. Schultz, L. P. Neukirch, M. Bhattacharya, and A. N. Vamivakas, “An optical tweezer phonon laser,” Nature Photonics, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 402–405, 2019

    2019

  36. [44]

    Coherent optical coupling to surface acous- tic wave devices,

    A. Iyer, Y. P. Kandel, W. Xu, J. M. Nichol, and W. H. Renninger, “Coherent optical coupling to surface acous- tic wave devices,” Nature Communications, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 3993, 2024

    2024

  37. [45]

    Continuous oscillations of acoustoelectric current in cds,

    J. Okada and H. Matino, “Continuous oscillations of acoustoelectric current in cds,” Japanese Journal of Ap- plied Physics , vol. 3, no. 11, p. 698, 1964

    1964

  38. [46]

    Giga- 10 hertz acousto-electric oscillations in zinc oxide,

    J. Maines, F. Marshall, E. Paige, and R. Stuart, “Giga- 10 hertz acousto-electric oscillations in zinc oxide,” Physics Letters A , vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 388–389, 1968

    1968

  39. [47]

    Current-spiking and self-locking of modes of the acousto-electric oscillator,

    J. Maines and E. Paige, “Current-spiking and self-locking of modes of the acousto-electric oscillator,” Solid State Communications, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 421–425, 1970

    1970

  40. [48]

    Phonon-electron in- teractions in piezoelectric semiconductor bulk acoustic wave resonators,

    V. J. Gokhale and M. Rais-Zadeh, “Phonon-electron in- teractions in piezoelectric semiconductor bulk acoustic wave resonators,” Scientific reports, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 5617, 2014

    2014

  41. [49]

    Acoustoelectric am- plification in lateral-extensional composite piezo-silico n resonant cavities,

    H. Mansoorzare and R. Abdolvand, “Acoustoelectric am- plification in lateral-extensional composite piezo-silico n resonant cavities,” in 2019 Joint Conference of the IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium and Euro- pean Frequency and Time Forum (EFTF/IFC) , pp. 1–3, IEEE, 2019

    2019

  42. [50]

    Non-reciprocal acous- toelectric microwave amplifiers with net gain and low noise in continuous operation,

    L. Hackett, M. Miller, S. Weatherred, S. Arterburn, M. J. Storey, G. Peake, D. Dominguez, P. S. Finnegan, T. A. Friedmann, and M. Eichenfield, “Non-reciprocal acous- toelectric microwave amplifiers with net gain and low noise in continuous operation,” Nature Electronics, vol. 6,...

    2023

  43. [51]

    Towards single-chip radiofre- quency signal processing via acoustoelectric electron– phonon interactions,

    L. Hackett, M. Miller, F. Brimigion, D. Dominguez, G. Peake, A. Tauke-Pedretti, S. Arterburn, T. A. Fried- mann, and M. Eichenfield, “Towards single-chip radiofre- quency signal processing via acoustoelectric electron– phonon interactions,” Nature communications , vol. 12, no. ...

    2021

  44. [52]

    Giant electron-mediated phononic nonlinearity in semiconductor–piezoelectric heterostructures,

    L. Hackett, M. Koppa, B. Smith, M. Miller, S. Santillan, S. Weatherred, S. Arterburn, T. A. Friedmann, N. Ot- terstrom, and M. Eichenfield, “Giant electron-mediated phononic nonlinearity in semiconductor–piezoelectric heterostructures,” Nature Materials , vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 1...

    2024

  45. [53]

    A normal mode theory for the rayleigh wave amplifier,

    G. Kino and T. Reeder, “A normal mode theory for the rayleigh wave amplifier,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 909–920, 1971

    1971

  46. [54]

    Acoustic amplification in semiconductors and metals,

    A. Pippard, “Acoustic amplification in semiconductors and metals,” Philosophical Magazine , vol. 8, no. 85, pp. 161–165, 1963

    1963

  47. [55]

    L. A. Coldren, Monolithic acoustic surface wave ampli- fiers. Stanford University, 1972

    1972

  48. [57]

    Reversing multistrip coupler,

    E. Danicki, “Reversing multistrip coupler,” Ultrasonics, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 421–424, 1993

    1993

  49. [58]

    At- tenuation of acoustic waves in lithium niobate,

    I. Bajak, A. McNab, J. Richter, and C. Wilkinson, “At- tenuation of acoustic waves in lithium niobate,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America , vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 689–695, 1981

    1981

  50. [59]

    High acoustic veloc- ity x-cut lithium niobate sub-terahertz electromechan- ics,

    J. Xie, M. Shen, and H. X. Tang, “High acoustic veloc- ity x-cut lithium niobate sub-terahertz electromechan- ics,” Applied Physics Letters , vol. 124, no. 7, 2024

    2024

  51. [60]

    Phononic band structure engineering for high-q gigahertz surface acoustic wave resonators on lithium nio- bate,

    L. Shao, S. Maity, L. Zheng, L. Wu, A. Shams-Ansari, Y.-I. Sohn, E. Puma, M. Gadalla, M. Zhang, C. Wang, et al. , “Phononic band structure engineering for high-q gigahertz surface acoustic wave resonators on lithium nio- bate,” Physical Review Applied , vol. 12, no. 1, p. 014022, 2019

    2019

  52. [61]

    Ab initio calculations of nonlinear susceptibility and multiphonon mixing processes in a 2deg-piezoelectric het- erostructure,

    E. Chatterjee, A. Wendt, D. Soh, and M. Eichenfield, “Ab initio calculations of nonlinear susceptibility and multiphonon mixing processes in a 2deg-piezoelectric het- erostructure,” Physical Review Research , vol. 6, no. 2, p. 023288, 2024

    2024

  53. [62]

    Measuring phase noise with a real-time sampling oscilloscope,

    Keysight Technologies, “Measuring phase noise with a real-time sampling oscilloscope,” 2025. Accessed: 2025- 04-17. V. METHODS A. Device fabrication A lattice-matched epitaxial semiconductor layer is first grown on a two inch Indium Phosphide (InP) wafer using metal-organic che...

    2025

  54. [63]

    Morgan, Surface acoustic wave filters: With applications to electro nic communications and signal processing

    D. Morgan, Surface acoustic wave filters: With applications to electro nic communications and signal processing . Academic Press, 2010

    2010

  55. [64]

    Non-reciprocal acoustoelectri c microwave amplifiers with net gain and low noise in continuous operation,

    L. Hackett, M. Miller, S. Weatherred, S. Arterburn, M. J. Storey, G. Peake, D. Dominguez, P. S. Finnegan, T. A. Friedmann, and M. Eichenfield, “Non-reciprocal acoustoelectri c microwave amplifiers with net gain and low noise in continuous operation,” Nature Electronics, vol. 6, ...

    2023

  56. [65]

    Phononic band structure engineering for high-q gigahertz surface acoustic wave resonators on lithium niobate,

    L. Shao, S. Maity, L. Zheng, L. Wu, A. Shams-Ansari, Y.-I. S ohn, E. Puma, M. Gadalla, M. Zhang, C. Wang, et al. , “Phononic band structure engineering for high-q gigahertz surface acoustic wave resonators on lithium niobate,” Physical Review Applied, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 014022, 2019

    2019

  57. [66]

    Temperature coefficients of saw delay and velocit y for y-cut and rotated linbo/sub 3,

    R. B. Ward, “Temperature coefficients of saw delay and velocit y for y-cut and rotated linbo/sub 3,” IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control , vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 481–483, 1990

    1990

  58. [67]

    Nonlinear, elastic, piezoelec tric, electrostrictive, and dielectric constants of lithium ni obate,

    Y. Cho and K. Yamanouchi, “Nonlinear, elastic, piezoelec tric, electrostrictive, and dielectric constants of lithium ni obate,” Journal of applied physics , vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 875–887, 1987

    1987

  59. [68]

    Infrared and optical masers,

    A. L. Schawlow and C. H. Townes, “Infrared and optical masers, ” Physical review, vol. 112, no. 6, p. 1940, 1958

    1940

  60. [69]

    Theory of the linewidth of semiconductor lasers,

    C. Henry, “Theory of the linewidth of semiconductor lasers, ” IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics , vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 259–264, 1982

    1982

  61. [70]

    Phonon-electron interac tions in piezoelectric semiconductor bulk acoustic wave res- onators,

    V. J. Gokhale and M. Rais-Zadeh, “Phonon-electron interac tions in piezoelectric semiconductor bulk acoustic wave res- onators,” Scientific reports , vol. 4, no. 1, p. 5617, 2014

    2014

  62. [71]

    R. W. Rhea, Oscillator design & computer simulation . Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1990

    1990

  63. [72]

    Towards single-chip radiofrequency signal proc essing via acoustoelectric electron–phonon interactions,

    L. Hackett, M. Miller, F. Brimigion, D. Dominguez, G. Peake, A. Tauke-Pedretti, S. Arterburn, T. A. Friedmann, and M. Eichenfield, “Towards single-chip radiofrequency signal proc essing via acoustoelectric electron–phonon interactions,” Nature communications, vol. 12, no. 1, p....

    2021

  64. [73]

    Giant electron-mediated phononic nonlinea rity in semiconductor–piezoelectric heterostructures,

    L. Hackett, M. Koppa, B. Smith, M. Miller, S. Santillan, S . Weatherred, S. Arterburn, T. A. Friedmann, N. Otterstrom, and M. Eichenfield, “Giant electron-mediated phononic nonlinea rity in semiconductor–piezoelectric heterostructures,” Nature Materials, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 13...

    2024

  65. [74]

    Fabry-p´ erot resonator: spectral line shapes, generic and related airy distributions, linewidths, finesses, and performance at low or fre quency-dependent reflectivity,

    N. Ismail, C. C. Kores, D. Geskus, and M. Pollnau, “Fabry-p´ erot resonator: spectral line shapes, generic and related airy distributions, linewidths, finesses, and performance at low or fre quency-dependent reflectivity,” Optics express , vol. 24, no. 15, pp. 16366–16389, 2016

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.