Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 41 references

Complexity of frequency fluctuations and the interpretive style in the bass viola da gamba

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Frequency fluctuations in recordings by one viola da gamba player collapse into a single exponential distribution in 13 of 14 pieces, and the paper attributes that shared signature to the performer's interpretive style.

desk verdict Interesting question, but the network construction as written cannot produce the reported cliques—the paper needs a major methodological fix before it is publishable. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.14448 v1 pith:7L2X23FX submitted 2025-05-20 cs.SD eess.ASstat.AP

Igor Lugo , Martha G. Alatriste-Contreras , Rafael Sánchez-Guevara This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.SDeess.ASstat.AP
keywords frequencyfluctuationscomplexnetworkbassvioladagambaspectraldecompositionexponentialdistributiondegreecentralitycliqueinterpretivestyle
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to show that interpretive style leaves a measurable fingerprint in the audio signal itself, not just in the score. The authors convert the spectral frequencies of 14 recordings by one bass viola da gamba player into a 'network of sounds,' then ask which statistical distribution best fits the frequency components and how the network's centrality and cliques behave. They find an exponential distribution in 13 of 14 pieces and strongly correlated degree-centrality patterns across most of the repertoire, despite the pieces spanning three composers, several recording dates, and three venues. Because the only constant across the recordings was the same interpreter playing the same instrument, the paper concludes that these large-scale regularities are the performer's imprint, with small-scale network differences capturing fine details of each performance. If the claim is right, listening to the spectrum of a recording could identify who is playing, independent of the written music.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the 'network of sounds': a graph in which each spectral frequency component becomes a node labeled by the pair of equal-tempered notes whose pitches bracket it (for example {E4, F4}), and edges connect each component to the component immediately before and after it in the spectral sequence. Degree centrality then ranks the most connected sound groups, and the largest clique, found with the Bron–Kerbosch algorithm, identifies functional groups of sounds that interact closely. The other load-bearing piece is the best-fit procedure, which uses the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test to choose among seven theoretical distributions; the exponential distribution wins in nearly every case, and this recurrence is what the paper treats as the signature of the interpreter.

What would settle it

Record the same repertoire on the same instrument with several different viola da gamba players, or record the same player on a different viola da gamba, using the same microphone chain; if the exponential distribution and the high degree-correlation pattern appear in every case, the performer-specific interpretation is falsified. Alternatively, compute the best-fit distribution and largest cliques on shuffled or randomly relabeled spectral sequences; if the shuffled data reproduce the same regularity, the result is an artifact of the pipeline.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that a diverse set of pieces played by one musician on one instrument shows a common statistical and network signature. After a fast Fourier transform of each audio file, the resulting frequency components fit an exponential distribution in 13 of 14 cases, with the single outlier ('4Otra cadencia') fitted by a gibrat distribution, a special case of the lognormal. When the frequency components are translated into a network of sounds—each node a pair of equal-tempered notes bracketing a frequency, each edge linking consecutive components—the degree centrality of nodes positively and strongly correlates across 78% of the pieces, and the largest cliques consistently span 35 to 70 nodes across the same low-to-middle note ranges. The two separate recordings of Abel's Arpeggiata, made months apart, show a degree correlation of 0.97 and similar clique sizes, which the authors read as evidence that the performer's frequency-fluctuation signature is stable while remaining sensitive to venue and recording equipment.

Load-bearing premise

The claim rests on the premise that the only thing shared by all 14 recordings—the same performer and the same instrument—is what produces the shared exponential distribution and correlated network measures; the study does not test any other performer, instrument, recording setup, or shuffled-frequency null model, so any of those could be the real source of the pattern.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single performer's recorded audio should consistently show an exponential distribution of spectral frequencies and positively correlated degree-centrality measures across different composers, pieces, and recording venues.
  • Two recordings of the same piece by the same player will retain a high degree correlation (0.97 in the reported Arpeggiata pair) and similar largest-clique sizes, while differing in fine-grained node counts in particular note ranges.
  • Different musicians playing the same pieces should produce measurably different network-of-sounds fingerprints, making the method a candidate for algorithmic style comparison.
  • The exponential regularity coexists with small-scale network variations, which the paper interprets as the predictable and unpredictable components of the performer's style, consistent with the view that a performance is computationally irreducible.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same exponential fit might appear for any instrument with harmonic-rich, low-frequency-dominant timbre, so a control using a different musician on the same instrument, or the same musician on a different instrument, is needed to separate style from timbre and tuning drift.
  • Shuffling the spectral sequence or randomizing the equal-tempered labels would provide a null model; if the shuffled data still fit an exponential distribution and produce 35-to-70-node cliques, then those measures are not carrying performer-specific information.
  • If the method generalizes, it could serve as a forensic attribution tool for unidentified or historically disputed viola da gamba recordings, since the recurring distribution and network signature would be compared across candidate performers.
  • The use of three different recording venues across the dataset offers a natural stress test: the reported differences between the two Arpeggiata recordings hint that the method's fine-grained network measures may be sensitive to microphones and room acoustics, which future work could quantify directly.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a method for characterizing a viola da gamba performer's interpretive style from audio recordings. For each of 14 live recordings by a single performer on a single instrument, the method computes an FFT spectrum, fits candidate statistical distributions to the resulting frequency components via Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests, and constructs an undirected 'network of sounds' whose nodes are pairs of adjacent equal-tempered notes and whose edges supposedly connect consecutive frequency components. The paper reports that the exponential distribution best fits 13 of 14 pieces, that degree-centrality correlations across pieces are mostly high, and that largest cliques contain 35–70 nodes. It interprets these results as evidence that the performer imprints a distinctive pattern of frequency fluctuations, and it states in Section 6 that 'We confirm that our hypothesis is correct.'

Significance. The topic is potentially interesting: connecting spectral statistics and network measures to performer identity could contribute to music information retrieval and performance analysis. The paper has some genuine exploratory virtues: it uses a real corpus of live recordings, integrates signal processing with music-theoretic note labels, and states an intention to share code and data. However, the central claim is not supported by the present analysis. The network construction as written is internally inconsistent with the reported clique sizes, the design lacks any control performer, instrument, or null model, and the statistical confirmation is circular because the same data are used to fit and to validate the distribution. These are load-bearing problems that prevent the results from being evaluated or reproduced. If properly reworked with a coherent network definition and a multi-performer comparison, the underlying idea could be worth exploring, but as submitted the significance of the claimed findings cannot be assessed.

major comments (4)
  1. [§4.3, Figure 5] The stated edge rule—connecting each frequency component to its immediate predecessor and successor in the sequence—produces a graph in which every edge lies between consecutive elements, i.e., a subgraph of a path. In such a graph every clique has size at most 2. The reported largest cliques of 35 to 70 nodes (Section 5, Figure 5) are therefore impossible under the described construction. The manuscript does not describe the additional aggregation step or alternative edge rule that would be needed to obtain these cliques, so the network results as reported are not reproducible and the network-based evidence for 'similar frequency fluctuations' cannot be evaluated.
  2. [§6] The central attribution of the observed regularities to the performer rests on the claim that 'the only constants in our musical cases were the same interpreter and his bass viola da gamba.' However, the design has no control performer, no control instrument, no null model of random frequency sequences, and no statistical comparison against recordings by other performers. Repertoire, recording venue, recording date, and recording equipment vary across the 14 files, so the same-performer attribution is confounded with these factors. The sentence 'We confirm that our hypothesis is correct' is therefore not supported by the presented analysis, which does not test the hypothesis against any alternative.
  3. [§4.2, Table 2] The best-fit procedure estimates distribution parameters from each piece of music and then applies the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to the same data, yet the reported p-values (e.g., 0.93 for '1Preludio re mayor') are interpreted as standard goodness-of-fit probabilities. No correction for estimated parameters (such as Lilliefors correction or a simulation-based null) is described. In addition, the candidate distribution list is taken from the authors' prior papers without external justification, and the exponential fit is then presented as evidence for the performer-style hypothesis even though no alternative hypothesis—such as repertoire or recording-chain effects—is tested. This circularity undermines the statistical-regularity claim.
  4. [§4.1, §4.3, reproducibility] Essential implementation details are missing: the audio sample rate, FFT window size and overlap, how the 'constituent frequencies' are selected from the spectrum (all bins, local maxima, or something else), and how the mapping to equal-tempered pitch-pair nodes handles repeated frequencies or frequencies outside the musical range. The statement that 'the database and the code will be available' on OSF gives no URL or release date, so the analysis cannot be replicated as submitted. These omissions are load-bearing because the network results, including the degree-centrality correlations and clique sizes, depend precisely on these undocumented choices.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 1 / §3] The spelling of the piece names is inconsistent: 'Arpegaita' appears in Table 1 while 'Arpeggiata' and 'Arpegiata' appear elsewhere; 'Sanite-Colombe' is a typo for 'Sainte-Colombe'. Please standardize the piece and composer names throughout.
  2. [§4.2 / Table 2] The exponential distribution is defined as f(x)=exp(-x), i.e., unit rate, but Table 2 lists two parameters for each exponential fit (e.g., 8.217e-05 and 29.797 for '1Preludio re mayor'). The parameterization used (scale, location, or rate) is not defined, making the reported fits ambiguous.
  3. [References] Several references have errors: Massey (2020) should be Massey (1951); Bron and Kerbosch (2015) should be Bron and Kerbosch (1973); and there are formatting issues such as double commas in 'Cooley et. al.,,' and 'Hagberg et. al.,,'. Please check the reference list.
  4. [§5 / Figure 4] The text in Section 5 states that the degree correlation matrix uses Spearman correlation, but no details are given about which degree values are correlated (e.g., per-node degrees across pieces) or how ties are handled. Please clarify the computation and add a colorbar/legend to Figure 4.
  5. [§4.4 / Figure 3] The caption of Figure 3 states that only nodes belonging to the largest clique appear, but the text says the figure 'encapsulates the degree centrality and the largest clique in a network of sounds.' Please clarify what is plotted, and note whether the spiral layout is computed from the largest clique alone or from the full network.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The confirmed exponential regularity reduces to the KS best-fit output on the same recordings; the remaining network content is separate but entangled with the same data.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 5 Results (Table 2) and Section 6 Discussion]
    "As shown in Table 2, second column, the statistical distribution that best fits the spectral data in almost all cases is the exponential. ... Therefore, after doing the best fit analysis, we noticed a clear presence of the exponential distribution just over 92% of all cases. ... We confirm that our hypothesis is correct. We found the presence of a similar statistical distribution—exponential—in the set of different pieces of music due to the performance of a same musician."

    The exponential 'regularity' is the output of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov best-fit procedure, not an independent prediction. The same 14 audio files are used both to select the best-fitting distribution and to 'confirm' the hypothesized regularity. No held-out recording, null model, random-frequency baseline, or control performer is introduced. Stating that the exponential distribution is present therefore restates what the fitting routine returned; it does not provide independent evidence that the musician's interpretive style caused the pattern. The confirmation step is equivalent, by construction, to the fit rather than to a test of the performer hypothesis.

full rationale

The paper's central distributional claim is partially circular because the 'large-scale statistical regularity' is a fitted result presented as a confirmed hypothesis. The candidate distribution list is taken from the authors' own prior work, but those works are not about music and the list is generic, so I treat that self-citation as method borrowing rather than load-bearing circularity. The network centrality and clique computations are not derived from the distribution fit; they are separate calculations on the same spectral components, so they retain independent content. However, the reported clique sizes of 35-70 appear incompatible with the stated consecutive-frequency edge rule; that is a reproducibility and correctness defect, not a circular reduction, and is not scored here. The causal attribution to the performer rests on the untested 'only constants' premise, which is a confound concern rather than a definitional circularity. Overall, one central confirmation reduces to the fit, giving moderate partial circularity, but the paper is not wholly equivalent to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on several unstated modeling choices and one untested causal premise. The distribution family is borrowed from the authors' prior work, the graph construction is underspecified and internally inconsistent, and the attribution to interpretive style assumes away instrument, repertoire, and recording confounds.

free parameters (4)
  • Candidate distribution family = normal, log-normal, exponential, Pareto, Gibrat, power law, exponentiated Weibull
    Chosen in Section 4.2 from the authors' earlier papers; the conclusion that exponential fits best is conditional on this list and on the fitting procedure, which is not fully specified.
  • Frequency-to-node quantization = Pair of closest equal-tempered notes for each Hz value
    Defined in Section 4.3; different quantization schemes would change node counts, degree centrality, and clique structure, and no sensitivity analysis is given.
  • FFT component selection parameters = Not specified
    Section 4.1 gives the FFT formula but not sampling rate, windowing, or how individual 'constituent frequencies' are extracted; these choices determine the data distribution and network.
  • Per-piece distribution parameters = e.g., exponential (loc, scale) values in Table 2; Gibrat parameters for '4Otra cadencia'
    Fitted to each recording's spectral data; the KS p-values in Table 2 are computed after estimation, which is known to inflate p-values.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The FFT output can be treated as an ordered list of constituent frequencies suitable for distribution fitting and network edge construction
    Invoked in Sections 4.1 and 4.3 without specifying how the list is formed; this is load-bearing because the network is built from it.
  • domain assumption The same performer is the only relevant constant, so observed regularities are attributable to interpretive style
    Explicit in Section 6; ignores instrument, repertoire, and recording-chain confounds; no control group.
  • domain assumption Kolmogorov-Smirnov p-values with parameters estimated from the same data are valid evidence of fit
    Used in Section 4.2 and Table 2; standard KS null distribution does not hold for estimated parameters, so high p-values do not by themselves confirm exponential fits.
  • ad hoc to paper Largest cliques of size 35-70 can arise from the described edge rule
    Section 4.3 defines edges only between consecutive components, which forms a path-like graph; Section 5 reports clique sizes that require a different, unstated edge aggregation.
  • domain assumption Degree centrality sequences from different pieces are comparable via Spearman correlation
    Figure 4 is described without explaining how nodes are matched across pieces with different note sets.
invented entities (1)
  • Network of sounds
    purpose: Graph model in which nodes are equal-tempered note-pair bins and edges are consecutive spectral-component adjacencies; used to compute degree centrality and cliques
    Introduced as a new modeling object in Section 4.3; no external validation or comparison to alternative audio representations, and its edge definition is not consistent with the reported clique sizes.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Complexity of frequency fluctuations and the interpretive style in the bass viola da gamba." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7L2X23FX

@misc{pith2026250514448,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Complexity of frequency fluctuations and the interpretive style in the bass viola da gamba},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7L2X23FX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.14448}
}
read the original abstract

Audio signals in a set of musical pieces are modeled as a complex network for studying the relationship between the complexity of frequency fluctuations and the interpretive style of the bass viola da gamba. Based on interdisciplinary scientific and music approaches, we compute the spectral decomposition and translated its frequency components to a network of sounds. We applied a best fit analysis for identifying the statistical distributions that describe more precisely the behavior of such frequencies and computed the centrality measures and identify cliques for characterizing such a network. Findings suggested statistical regularities in the type of statistical distribution that best describes frequency fluctuations. The centrality measure confirmed the most influential and stable group of sounds in a piece of music, meanwhile the identification of the largest clique indicated functional groups of sounds that interact closely for identifying the emergence of complex frequency fluctuations. Therefore, by modeling the sound as a complex network, we can clearly associate the presence of large-scale statistical regularities with the presence of similar frequency fluctuations related to different musical events played by a same musician.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.14448 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flowchart of the method. Therefore, our method aims to unveil the complex systems attributes related to the presence of similar patterns of complex frequency fluctuations. In the next subsection, we shall describe each of this steps in more detail. 4.1 Spectral decomposition The spectral decomposition is a method that simplifies a waveform in a set of its constituent fre￾quencies to identify approximately their pitc… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Best fit statistical distribution. The digital audio is related to the file of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Network of sounds. Spiral layout where the positions of nodes are related to their degree [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Degree correlation matrix. We computed the Spearman correlation coefficient and com [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Number of and type of nodes in the largest cliques [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    (2000), Guide to the Basic Concepts and Techniques of Spectral Music, Contemporary Music Review, 19(2), p

    Fineberg, J. (2000), Guide to the Basic Concepts and Techniques of Spectral Music, Contemporary Music Review, 19(2), p. 81--113. https://music.arts.uci.edu/abauer/5.4/readings/Fineberg\_Basics\_Spectral.pdf https://music.arts.uci.edu/abauer/5.4/readings/Fineberg\_Basics\_Spectral.pdf

    work page 2000

  2. [3]

    Byrd, D. (2007), A Table of Musical Pitches, School of Informatics & Jacobs School of Music, Indiana University, https://homes.luddy.indiana.edu/donbyrd/Teach/MusicalPitchesTable.htm https://homes.luddy.indiana.edu/donbyrd/Teach/MusicalPitchesTable.htm

    work page 2007

  3. [4]

    (2002), A New Kind of Science, Wolfram Media Inc

    Wolfram, S. (2002), A New Kind of Science, Wolfram Media Inc

    work page 2002

  4. [5]

    Rowland, T. (2025). Computational Irreducibility. From MathWorld--A Wolfram Web Resource, created by Eric W. Weisstein. https://mathworld.wolfram.com/ComputationalIrreducibility.html

    work page 2025

  5. [6]

    Perlovsky, L. (2017). Music, passion, and cognitive function. London: Academic Press

    work page 2017

  6. [7]

    and Bordonyuk, V

    Solomonova, O, Ohanezova-Hryhorenko, O., Demydova, V., Kuchurivskyi, Y. and Bordonyuk, V. (2023). Interpretive Content of a Musical Work: The Performing Aspect Convergências, Revista de Investigação e Ensino das Artes, VOL XVI (32), 125--138 https://doi.org/10.53681/c1514225187514391s.32.218 https://doi.org/10.53681/c1514225187514391s.32.218

    work page doi:10.53681/c1514225187514391s.32.218 2023

  7. [8]

    Tse, and Michael Small (2010)

    Xiao Fan Liu, Chi K. Tse, and Michael Small (2010). Complex network structure of musical compositions: Algorithmic generation of appealing music, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Volume 389, Issue 1, Pages 126-132, ISSN 0378-4371, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2009.08.035 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2009.08.035

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physa.2009.08.035 2010

  8. [9]

    Ferretti, S. (2017) On the modeling of musical solos as complex networks, Information Sciences, Volume 375, Pages 271-295, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.10.007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.10.007

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ins.2016.10.007 2017

Show all 41 references
  1. [10]

    Lugo, I., and Alatriste-Contreras, M. G. (2025). Statistical Regularities in the Musical Work of Marin Marais, Pièces de viole des Cinq Livres. In Computational Statistics--Predicting the Future from Sample, Eds. Christos, Volos Data Intechopen. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.1008478...

    2025

  2. [11]

    Lugo, I., and Alatriste-Contreras, M. G. (2024). Musical composition based on skewed statistical distributions of stochastic processes. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2351656 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2351656

    2024

  3. [12]

    and Barabási, A

    Albert, R. and Barabási, A. (2002), Statistical Mechanics of Complex Networks, Reviews of Modern Physics 74(1), pp. 47--97

    2002

  4. [13]

    (2010), Statistical Physics, in Modern Physics ed

    Morrison, J.C. (2010), Statistical Physics, in Modern Physics ed. Morrison, J.C., Chapter 7, Academic Press, pp. 145--186, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375112-6.00016-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375112-6.00016-3

    2010 doi

  5. [14]

    (2016), Music Theory Remixed: A Blended Approach for the Practicing Musician, Oxford University Press

    Holm-Hudson, K. (2016), Music Theory Remixed: A Blended Approach for the Practicing Musician, Oxford University Press

    2016

  6. [15]

    (2020), Topology of networks in generalized musical spaces

    Buongiorno Nardelli, M. (2020), Topology of networks in generalized musical spaces. Leonardo Music Journal, 30: pp. 38--43

    2020

  7. [16]

    Busoni, F. (1911). Sketch of a New Esthetic of Music, Translator: Theodore Baker, Release Date: March 27, 2010 [EBook \#31799]. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/31799/31799- h/31799-h.htm https://www.gutenberg.org/files/31799/31799- h/31799-h.htm

    1911

  8. [17]

    and Davy, M

    Klapuri, A. and Davy, M. (2006), Signal Processing Methods for Music Transcription, Springer

    2006

  9. [18]

    and Klapuri, Music Signal Processing (2014)

    M\" u ller, M. and Klapuri, Music Signal Processing (2014). In:Trussell, J and Srivastava, A. and Roy-Chowdhury, A.K. and Srivastava, A. and Naylor, P.A. and Chellappa, R. and Theodoridis, S. editors. Academic Press Library in Signal Processing: Volume 4: Elsevier; 2014. p. 71...

    2014 doi

  10. [19]

    Think DSP: Digital Signal Processing in Python

    Downey AB (2016). Think DSP: Digital Signal Processing in Python. Needham, Massachusetts: Shroff Publishers & Distributors Pvt. Ltd

    2016

  11. [20]

    Héroux, I. (2018). Creative processes in the shaping of a musical interpretation: A study of nine professional musicians. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(665)

    2018

  12. [21]

    Molino, J. (2011). El hecho musical y la semiología de la música. From González Aktories, Susana y Gonzalo Camacho Díaz (coords.). Reflexiones sobre semiología musical. Mexico: Escuela Nacional de Música, UNAM

    2011

  13. [22]

    Lugo, I., and Alatriste-Contreras, M. G. (2024). Musical composition and 2D cellular automata based on music intervals. arXiv:2411.19844. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.19844 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.19844

    2024 doi arXiv

  14. [23]

    Rousseau, J. (1975). Traité de la viole. Geneva: Minkoff

    1975

  15. [24]

    Demachy, M. (1685). Pièces de violle. Paris: chez l’auteur. gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k858533r gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k858533r (Retrieved Apr. 23, 2025)

    2025

  16. [25]

    Savall, J. (2007). Marais - Pièces À Deux Viols, Audio CD, HARMONIA MUNDI USA

    2007

  17. [26]

    Ledbetter, D. (2001). Style brisé. Grove Music Online.\\ oxfordmusiconline.com/grovemusic/view/10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.001.0001/omo-9781561592630-e-0000027042 oxfordmusiconline.com/grovemusic/view/10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.001.0001/omo-9781561592630-e-0000027042 (Retrieved 2...

    2001

  18. [27]

    Holman, P. (2010). Life after death. The viola da gamba in Britain from Purcell to Dolmetsch. Woodbridge: Boydell Press

    2010

  19. [28]

    Cyr, M. (1987). Carl Friedrich Abel's Solos: A Musical Offering to Gainsborough?. The Musical Times, 128-1732, pp. 317-321. jstor.org/stable/1193732 jstor.org/stable/1193732 (Retrieved Apr. 25, 2020)

    1987

  20. [29]

    27 pieces for the viola da gamba, New York Public Library Digital Collections

    New York Public Library (2025). 27 pieces for the viola da gamba, New York Public Library Digital Collections. Accessed April 24, 2025. https://digitalcollections.nypl.org/items/233dafb0-0d02-013b-7ecc-0242ac110002 https://digitalcollections.nypl.org/items/233dafb0-0d02-013b-7...

    2025

  21. [30]

    (2006), Escuchar la interpretación, La interpretación musical, John Rink, ed

    Clarke, E. (2006), Escuchar la interpretación, La interpretación musical, John Rink, ed. Madrid: Alianza

    2006

  22. [31]

    Nosek, B. A. et al. (2015) Promoting an open research culture. Science 348, 1422--1425. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aab2374 https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aab2374

    2015 doi

  23. [32]

    and Tukey, J.W

    Cooley, J.W. and Tukey, J.W. (1965)An algorithm for the machine calculation of complex Fourier series. Math. Comput,19:297--301

    1965

  24. [33]

    and Teukolsky, S

    Press, W. and Teukolsky, S. and Vetterline, W.T. and Flannery, B.P. (2007) Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing, ch. 12--13. Cambridge Univ. Press

    2007

  25. [34]

    SciPy tutorial, Fourier Transforms (scipy.fft) (2025) https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/tutorial/fft.html [Accessed: March 26, 2025]

    2025

  26. [35]

    Massey, F. (2020). The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for goodness of fit. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 46, 68--78

    2020

  27. [36]

    Lugo, I., Martínez-Mekler, G. (2022). Theoretical study of the effect of ports in the formation of city systems. J. shipp. trd. 7, 16. doi:10.1186/s41072-022-00117-6 https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-022-00117-6

    2022 doi

  28. [37]

    Lugo, I., Alatriste-Contreras, M.G. (2022). Intervention strategies with 2D cellular automata for testing SARS-CoV-2 and reopening the economy. Sci Rep, 12, 13481. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-17665-3 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17665-3

    2022 doi

  29. [38]

    Univariate Distribution Relationship Chart

    The College of William & Mary (2025). Univariate Distribution Relationship Chart. https://www.math.wm.edu/ leemis/chart/UDR/about.html https://www.math.wm.edu/ leemis/chart/UDR/about.html

    2025

  30. [39]

    and Swart, P.J

    Hagberg, A.A., Schult, D.A. and Swart, P.J. (2008) Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using NetworkX, in Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference (SciPy2008), Gäel Varoquaux, Travis Vaught, and Jarrod Millman (Eds), (Pasadena, CA USA), pp. 11--15

    2008

  31. [40]

    and Kerbosch, J

    Bron, C. and Kerbosch, J. (2015). Algorithm 457: finding all cliques of an undirected graph. Communications of the ACM 16(9), pp.575--577

    2015

  32. [41]

    Kendall, M. G. and Stuart, A. (1973). The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Volume 2: Inference and Relationship. Griffin. Section 31.18

    1973

  33. [42]

    Leech-Wilkinson, D. (2012). Compositions, scores, performances, meanings. Music Theory Online. mtosmt.org/issues/mto.12.18.1/mto.12.18.1.leech-wilkinson.php mtosmt.org/issues/mto.12.18.1/mto.12.18.1.leech-wilkinson.php (Retrieved 23 Apr. 2025)

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.