Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 60 references

Structural States of Filamentary Microgravity Dusty Plasma

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Filamentary dusty plasma clouds in the PK-4 microgravity experiment develop liquid-crystal-like order with pressure: intra-filament coupling strengthens, inter-filament coupling weakens, and layered six-fold arrangements appear.

desk verdict Useful experimental survey of PK-4 dust filament ordering, but the claimed simulation confirmation is contradicted by the paper's own DRIAD results. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.14576 v1 pith:C4G7NYE6 submitted 2025-05-20 physics.plasm-ph

Emerson Gehr , Abigail Terrell , Katrina Vermillion , Alexandria Mendoza , Bradley Andrew , Diana Jimenez Marti , Evdokiya Kostadinova , Peter Hartmann
show 2 more authors
Lorin Matthews Truell Hyde
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-ph PACS 52.27.Lw52.27.Gr
keywords dustyplasmacomplexliquid-crystalanaloguenematicphasesmecticpaircorrelationfunctionPlasmakristall-4ionwakefield
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Using video data from the Plasmakristall-4 (PK-4) laboratory on the International Space Station, this paper argues that filamentary dusty plasma clouds behave like macroscopic liquid crystals. The authors compute pair correlation functions within individual filaments, across filaments in a plane, and through reconstructed three-dimensional clouds for nine pressure-current conditions, and find that raising the neutral gas pressure from \(\approx 28.5\) Pa to \(\approx 70.5\) Pa strengthens and extends crystalline order inside filaments while weakening the coupling between filaments. Because neutral gas pressure acts as inverse temperature for dust in low-temperature plasma, the authors interpret this as a pressure-driven transition to a nematic-like state, with nested surface alignment and occasional six-fold symmetry in the cross-field plane suggesting a smectic-like state. The value of the claim is that dusty plasma is optically thin and large enough to watch individual 'molecules' move, so it could serve as a directly observable analogue for open questions about liquid-crystal phase transitions and pattern formation.

What carries the argument

The quantitative argument is carried by spherical-coordinate pair correlation functions \(G_\$\varphi$(r,\$\theta$)\) and \(G_\$\theta$(r,\phi)\), computed from particle-tracking data of PK-4 video. In these functions, periodic bright spots along the director axis ('string peaks') measure crystalline order inside each filament, bright bands at finite radius measure how strongly neighbouring filaments are coupled and how freely they slide, and spot-like structure in the bands reveals six-fold, smectic-like ordering in the cross-field plane. The second load-bearing element is the DRIAD N-body simulation, which follows individual dust grains and ions with dynamic dust charging and uses plasma conditions from a PIC/MCC model of ionization waves in the PK-4 discharge as time-varying inputs, rather than time-averaged values.

What would settle it

A pressure scan in PK-4 at fixed dust number density and fixed current, stepping pressure from about 25 to 75 Pa while measuring the intra-filament string peaks and the cross-filament bands in the angular pair correlation functions \(G_\phi\) and \(G_\$\theta$\), would settle whether the transition is driven by pressure; the same data could test the cooling mechanism by checking whether dust kinetic temperature, inferred from particle velocity distributions, decreases as pressure increases.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a pressure-dependent decoupling of the two axes of order in the PK-4 dust cloud. At 28.5 Pa the bulk cloud is a weakly crystalline solid: coupling between neighbouring particles is similar in strength and range whether the particles sit in the same field-aligned filament or in adjacent filaments. At 70.5 Pa the intra-filament coupling becomes stronger and longer-range—the angular pair correlation function \(G_\$\varphi$(r,\$\theta$)\) shows more pronounced string peaks extending further along the director axis—while the cross-filament coupling weakens, giving filaments the freedom to slide past one another. The authors take this anisotropic crystalline-plus-liquid character to be the dusty plasma equivalent of a nematic liquid crystal, with pressure playing the role of inverse temperature. They further observe particles arranged on nested surfaces for several conditions and, most clearly at 46.1 Pa and 0.35 mA, a six-fold symmetric arrangement of filaments in the plane perpendicular to the field, which they cite as evidence of smectic-like layered order. DRIAD simulations with ionization-wave-modulated plasma inputs reproduce the same trend: compared with the 40 Pa case, the 60 Pa case shows stronger intra-filament order, weaker inter-layer coupling, and crystallization of nested cylinders that proceeds from the outside inward.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the ordering change is caused by neutral gas pressure acting as inverse temperature, but the runs compared at different pressures also differ in dust density and current, and the simulations at 40 and 60 Pa are taken to represent the experimental trend, so if density, current, or simulation mismatch drives the effect, the liquid-crystal analogy would lose its stated mechanism.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the analogy is right, neutral gas pressure becomes a tunable control that plays the role of inverse temperature, allowing exploration of nematic and smectic phases in a system where every particle can be tracked by camera.
  • The stronger intra-filament and weaker inter-filament coupling at high pressure demonstrates that a single dusty plasma cloud can be simultaneously crystalline along one axis and liquid-like along another, the defining signature of liquid-crystal order.
  • The outer-to-inner crystallization of nested cylinders seen in DRIAD implies that the layered shell structure is a stable organizational principle of these clouds, not a boundary artifact.
  • Because the pair correlations were stable over 20-second intervals and the three-dimensional reconstruction used a slow Y-scan, the layered structure is a bulk property of the cloud rather than a transient of the measurement.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The nine data sets differ in dust density (\(55.1\) to \(123.6\) mm\(^{-3}\)) as well as pressure, so a decisive test of the pressure-as-temperature interpretation would be a dedicated PK-4 scan at fixed density and current; the authors themselves note that current and dust density dictate the interparticle separation.
  • If the nematic analogy is quantitative, the distribution of filament orientations should yield a nematic order parameter that grows continuously with pressure; computing it from existing tracking data would connect these structural observations to standard liquid-crystal theory.
  • The clearest six-fold symmetry appears at the highest dust density (46.1 Pa, 0.35 mA), which suggests dust density, not pressure alone, may control layered ordering; a testable prediction is that increasing density at fixed pressure should induce the same smectic-like symmetry.
  • The same data could be searched for defect structures and correlation-length scaling near the apparent transition, providing a direct comparison with predictions for the universality class of the nematic-smectic transition.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes nine sets of PK-4 ISS dusty-plasma data at three pressures (28.5, 46.1, 70.5 Pa) and three currents (0.35, 0.7, 1.0 mA), using 2D and 3D pair-correlation functions to argue that increasing neutral-gas pressure drives a transition from a weakly crystalline, isotropic state to a state with enhanced within-filament order and reduced cross-filament coupling, analogous to a nematic liquid crystal; nested layers and six-fold symmetry in some cases are interpreted as smectic-like ordering. The experimental observations are compared with DRIAD molecular-dynamics simulations at 40 Pa and 60 Pa, which are claimed to confirm the pressure-driven trend. The central claim is that pressure acts as inverse temperature, producing an LC-like phase transition in a macroscopic, optically thin dusty plasma.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this would be a valuable demonstration of a macroscopic analogue system for liquid-crystal phase transitions, with the advantage of full kinetic-level particle tracking. The paper makes use of a substantial PK-4 ISS dataset and provides a clear presentation of three complementary pair-correlation diagnostics. The DRIAD simulation code with dynamically evolving plasma conditions is a sophisticated tool, and the layered ('unwrapped cylinder') analysis is a nice addition. However, the manuscript currently establishes only a qualitative visual trend, and the simulation evidence is partially inconsistent with the main conclusion. The significance is therefore conditional on strengthening the quantitative analysis and resolving the internal contradiction between the simulation and the stated within-filament trend.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section IV (Figs. 18-20) vs. Section V] The DRIAD simulation results directly contradict the within-filament part of the central claim. In Section IV the authors state that 'the string peaks are less localized in the 60 Pa case (Fig. 18b) than for the lower-pressure 40 Pa case (Fig. 18a)' and that 'the highest crystallinity and degree of order within filaments are observed in the 40 Pa case', and Fig. 20 is summarized as showing 'a higher degree of order within a filament at this pressure' for 40 Pa. However, Section V concludes that 'We further confirm that at higher pressure, both the strength and range of coupling within filaments is enhanced while the cross-filament coupling is decreased.' This is an internal inconsistency. The simulation evidence, as presented, supports the cross-filament part of the claim but not the within-filament part. The authors must either reconcile these statements, for example by identifying a different mechanism for the within-filament enhancement, or explicitly weaken the conclusion to acknowledge that the simulations do not confirm the within-filament ordering trend.
  2. [Section II.C and Table I] The nine experimental sets vary not only in neutral-gas pressure but also in dust density (n ranges from 55.1 to 123.6 mm^-3 in Table I) and discharge current. The authors themselves note in Section II.C that 'interplay between current and dust density dictates the resulting interparticle separation.' Yet the central conclusion attributes the observed ordering differences to pressure acting as inverse temperature. No quantitative order parameters (e.g., bond-orientational order, nematic order parameter), error bars on the pair-correlation peaks, or statistical significance tests are provided; all structural conclusions are drawn by visual inspection of Figs. 8-12. As a result, the pressure-driven transition is not established as distinct from density- or current-driven effects. The authors should compute quantitative structural metrics for each condition and either control for n and I statistically or clearly delimit the parameter region in which the pressure trend is robust.
  3. [Section III.B and Table II] The simulation 'confirmation' is weakened by fitted inputs and by parameter mismatch with the experiments. The text states that 'We initially adjusted the radial confinement ω1 to match the interparticle spacing seen in the experiments, and then increased ω2 (confinement in the axial direction) until crystallization was achieved,' yet Table II lists identical values of ω1 and ω2 for the 40 Pa and 60 Pa simulations. This makes it unclear what was actually tuned and whether the two simulations differ only in the prescribed plasma conditions. Furthermore, the simulations use 40 Pa/0.8 mA and 60 Pa/2.0 mA, which do not correspond to the experimental pressures (28.5, 46.1, 70.5 Pa) or currents (0.35-1.0 mA), and the simulation pressures are not the same as the experimental low/high pressures used in the main trend. The comparison is therefore partly circular and not a direct test of the experimental pressure dependence. The authors should state the sensitivity of the results to ω1 and ω2, use conditions that match the experiments as closely as possible, and clarify how the fitted parameters affect the claimed confirmation.
  4. [Section V (inverse-temperature analogy)] The assertion that 'neutral gas pressure in dusty plasma acts as inverse temperature' is a central interpretive step, but it is not supported by a derivation or by a quantitative check (e.g., showing that the measured structural changes correspond to a known equation of state or to a measurable dust temperature). Because the experimental design is not a controlled temperature sweep, this analogy currently functions as an assumption rather than a demonstrated result. The authors should either provide direct evidence for the pressure-temperature mapping or reframe the claim as a suggestive analogy that motivates future experiments.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (4)] Equation (4) defines G(r) with a factor δ(φ_{ij} − φ) in the sum, but G(r) should depend only on the radial distance r, not on the azimuthal angle. This appears to be a typo; the azimuthal delta should be removed or the definition should be clarified.
  2. [Fig. 12 and text in Section II.C.2] The text refers to the '46.1 Pa, 0.35 mA case (Fig. 12 g)', but Fig. 12g shows the 70.5 Pa, 0.35 mA case; also '70.1 Pa' appears twice as a typo for 70.5 Pa. Please correct these figure cross-references and labels.
  3. [Section III.B and references] Reference [56] is cited for the statement that the asymmetric molecular dynamics scheme 'has been found to reasonably reproduce ion-dust interparticle forces calculated from PIC simulations', but [56] is 'A Note on the Generation of Random Normal Deviates' (Box and Muller). The citation appears to be incorrect; please verify and correct.
  4. [Section II.C (Y-scan deduplication)] The description of the Y-scan particle deduplication states that particles are filtered if 'less than a threshold distance from another particle in the next few subsequent frames', but no value for this threshold or for the number of subsequent frames is given. The 3D pair-correlation results depend on this processing step, so the threshold should be stated explicitly.
  5. [General presentation] There are several typos in the text, including 'withing' (Section II.C.1), 'the the' (Section IV), and 'a a clear' (Section II.C.2). A careful proofreading pass is recommended.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

Simulation 'confirmation' is partly forced by fitted confinement parameters; the experimental pair-correlation analysis itself is self-contained.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section IV (Numerical Results), DRIAD confinement tuning; echoed in Section V (Conclusion)]
    "We initially adjusted the radial confinement ω1 to match the interparticle spacing seen in the experiments, and then increased ω2 (confinement in the axial direction) until crystallization was achieved."

    The simulation is later described as confirming the experimental ordering, including the average interparticle spacing and crystalline behavior. But both were tuning targets: ω1 was fit to the measured spacing and ω2 was increased until crystallization appeared, so the agreement in spacing is a restatement of the fit rather than an independent prediction, and the crystalline order is commanded by the axial confinement. Furthermore, the simulation section itself reports the 40 Pa case as having the highest within-filament crystallinity, so the conclusion that higher pressure enhances within-filament coupling is not actually obtained from the (already tuned) simulation output.

full rationale

The primary experimental finding is not circular: the pair-correlation functions (Eqs. 1-4) are computed directly from tracked PK-4 particle positions, and the low- versus high-pressure comparison is an empirical observation rather than a model output. The liquid-crystal analogy is an interpretive overlay, not an input to the correlation analysis. The genuine circularity is limited to the simulation 'confirmation' advertised in the abstract and conclusion. In Section IV, DRIAD's radial confinement ω1 is adjusted to match the experimental interparticle spacing and ω2 is increased until crystallization is achieved, so the subsequent claim that the simulation confirms the spacing and ordering reduces to those fitted targets. A separate correctness concern, not itself a circularity, is that the reported simulation results contradict the within-filament part of the conclusion: Figs. 18 and 20 show the 40 Pa case has clearer string peaks and higher order within filaments than the 60 Pa case, whereas the conclusion states the simulation confirms enhanced within-filament coupling at higher pressure. Because the experimental derivation remains self-contained, the overall circularity score is moderate.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is primarily a measurement study with a supporting simulation. The main fitted inputs are the two DRIAD confinement frequencies, and the LC analogy is an interpretive layer. No new physical entities are introduced. Key caveats are the unstated deduplication threshold and the density confound in the experimental matrix.

free parameters (3)
  • omega1 (radial confinement frequency in DRIAD) = 4.0 x 10^5 N/(C m)
    Adjusted to match the experimental interparticle spacing before comparing simulation results to experiment (Section IV).
  • omega2 (axial confinement frequency in DRIAD) = 6.0 x 10^5 N/(C m)
    Increased until crystallization was achieved in the simulation, so it is fitted to reproduce the observed structure (Section IV).
  • Particle deduplication threshold in Y-scan reconstruction
    Section II C: particles closer than a threshold distance in consecutive frames are filtered as duplicates, but the threshold value is not reported.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Electrons in DRIAD are treated as a Boltzmann-distributed fluid rather than as discrete particles.
    Section III B: this is standard in dusty plasma simulation but is an approximation that could affect ion wake structure and dust charging.
  • domain assumption Ion-dust forces are computed with a shielded Coulomb potential for dust and a bare Coulomb potential for ions (asymmetric MD after Piel).
    Section III B: the paper states this reproduces PIC forces reasonably, but it is a modeling assumption.
  • domain assumption Neutral gas acts as a thermal bath with Langevin thermostat; dust-neutral drag depends on pressure and temperature.
    Section III B, Eq. (6) with F_therm = zeta R(t); this underlies the pressure-as-inverse-temperature interpretation.
  • ad hoc to paper Higher neutral pressure cools the dust through increased collision frequency, so pressure can be mapped to inverse temperature.
    Introduction and Conclusion: this analogy is central to the nematic transition claim but is not quantitatively established in this paper.
  • domain assumption The dust cloud is approximately stationary over the Y-scan duration, so successive 2D slices can be merged into a 3D reconstruction.
    Section II C 1, validated by small time variation in Fig. 8, but presented as an assumption.
  • domain assumption Particles appearing in consecutive Y-scan frames within a threshold distance are duplicates and are filtered out.
    Section II C: the threshold value is not specified, so the 3D reconstruction depends on an unstated parameter.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Structural States of Filamentary Microgravity Dusty Plasma." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/C4G7NYE6

@misc{pith2026250514576,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Structural States of Filamentary Microgravity Dusty Plasma},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/C4G7NYE6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.14576}
}
abstract

This study investigates the filamentary structural states of microgravity dusty plasma using data from the Plasmakristall-4 (PK-4) facility on board the International Space Station. The dust particles in the PK-4 discharge are observed to form field-aligned filaments and nested (layered) structures in response to changes in the plasma conditions, neutral gas pressure, and externally applied electric field. This work explores the possibility that these filamentary dusty plasmas exhibit properties of liquid crystals. The structural characteristics of the dust clouds are studied for nine sets of pressure-current conditions using pair correlation functions calculated for particles (i) within individual filaments, (ii) within the central plane of the dust cloud, and (iii) within successive planes of the cloud (the 3D cloud). It is observed that, at low pressure ($\approx$30 Pa), the entire cloud is in a weakly crystalline state with similar coupling of particles within filaments and among neighboring filaments. At high pressure ($\approx$70 Pa), the order within filaments improves (enhanced crystalline behavior), while the degree of freedom of filaments to move with respect to each other increases (enhanced liquid behavior). Since neutral gas pressure in dusty plasma acts as inverse temperature, we argue that the structural changes observed with increasing pressure are analogous to a transition to a nematic liquid crystal state. It is further observed that the filaments exhibit alignment in nested surfaces for several pressure-current conditions, suggesting the possibility of a smectic liquid crystal state. These results are confirmed by molecular dynamics simulations of the dust and ions using the DRIAD (Dynamic Response of Ions And Dust) code.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.14576 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Patterns and order observed in LC phases [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Examples of ion accumulation near charged dust [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The PK-4 setup: In the present experiments, DC [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (18 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. a) Filamentary dusty plasma cloud in neon DC dis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Successive images of the dust cloud taken 0.14 s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Coordinate system used for three-dimensional pair [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. 2D radial pair correlation functions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Two-dimensional radial pair correlation functions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Three-dimensional pair correlation functions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Plots of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Plots of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Results from the PIC/MCC simulation of PK-4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Contour plots of the total electric potential (top) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. a) Equilibrium charge and b) radial confinement [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Illustration of the cylindrical layers formation pro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: The second layer peaks are more diffuse in the 60 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_17.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: The 40 Pa case shows clearer peaks than the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_20.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. Results from a simulation of a cloud of 1700 dust grains in the PK-4 at: a, b) 40 Pa and c, d) 60 Pa. a, c) 200- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. Plots of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19. Plots of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_19.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20. Plots of the pair correlation function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_20.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Radial Pair Correlation The average interparticle separation can be determined from the location of the first peak of g(r). As g(r) is calculated for particles in successive planes across the cloud, shifts in the location of this peak can be used to identify gradients in dust density and the existence of layers. Data from dust particles within a central p...

    work page

  2. [2]

    ionization waves

    Angular Pair Correlations Further information about the 3D structural charac- teristics of the clouds is obtained from the the 3D an- gular pair correlation functions Gϕ(r, θ) from Eq. (2) and Gθ(r, ϕ) from Eq. (3). Fig. 11 shows Gϕ(r, θ) and Fig. 12 shows Gθ(r, ϕ) for all pressure-current conditions. The data for Gϕ(r, θ) is plotted in ( x, r) coordinate...

    work page

  3. [3]

    P. Lv, X. Yang, H. K. Bisoyi, H. Zeng, X. Zhang, Y. Chen, P. Xue, S. Shi, A. Priimagi, L. Wang, W. Feng, and Q. Li, Stimulus-driven liquid metal and liquid crystal network actuators for programmable soft robotics, Ma- terials Horizons 8, 2475 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Chen, J.-H

    H.-W. Chen, J.-H. Lee, B.-Y. Lin, S. Chen, and S.-T. Wu, Liquid crystal display and organic light-emitting diode display: present status and future perspectives, Light: Science & Applications 7, 17168 (2018), number: 3 Pub- lisher: Nature Publishing Group

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    D. L. White and G. N. Taylor, New absorptive mode reflective liquid-crystal display device, Journal of Applied Physics 45, 4718 (1974), publisher: American Institute of Physics

    work page 1974

  6. [6]

    Buguin, M.-H

    A. Buguin, M.-H. Li, P. Silberzan, B. Ladoux, and P. Keller, Micro-actuators: when artificial muscles made of nematic liquid crystal elastomers meet soft lithogra- phy, Journal of the American Chemical Society128, 1088 (2006)

    work page 2006

  7. [7]

    Z. Shen, F. Chen, X. Zhu, K.-T. Yong, and G. Gu, Stimuli-responsive functional materials for soft robotics, Journal of Materials Chemistry B 8, 8972 (2020), pub- lisher: The Royal Society of Chemistry

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Li and P

    M.-H. Li and P. Keller, Artificial muscles based on liquid crystal elastomers, Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences 364, 2763 (2006)

    work page 2006

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    S. J. Woltman, G. D. Jay, and G. P. Crawford, Liquid- crystal materials find a new order in biomedical applica- tions, Nature Materials 6, 929 (2007)

    2007

  2. [10]

    X. Liu, M. G. Debije, J. P. A. Heuts, and A. P. H. J. Schenning, Liquid-Crystalline Polymer Particles Prepared by Classical Polymerization Techniques, Chem- istry (Weinheim an Der Bergstrasse, Germany)27, 14168 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    A. A. Collyer, ed., Liquid Crystal Polymers: From Struc- tures to Applications (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1993)

    1993

  4. [12]

    Tao, Electric-field-induced phase transition in elec- trorheological fluids, Physical Review E 47, 423 (1993), publisher: American Physical Society

    R. Tao, Electric-field-induced phase transition in elec- trorheological fluids, Physical Review E 47, 423 (1993), publisher: American Physical Society

    1993

  5. [13]

    Hao, Electrorheological Fluids, Advanced Materials 13, 1847 (2001)

    T. Hao, Electrorheological Fluids, Advanced Materials 13, 1847 (2001)

    2001

  6. [14]

    Hao, The positive, negative, photo-ER, and electro- magnetorheological (EMR) effects, in Studies in Interface Science, Vol

    T. Hao, The positive, negative, photo-ER, and electro- magnetorheological (EMR) effects, in Studies in Interface Science, Vol. 22 (Elsevier, 2005) pp. 83–113

    2005

  7. [15]

    Stanway, J

    R. Stanway, J. L. Sproston, and A. K. El-Wahed, Appli- cations of electrorheological fluids in vibration control: a survey, Smart Materials and Structures 5, 464 (1996)

    1996

  8. [16]

    Sadeghi, L

    A. Sadeghi, L. Beccai, and B. Mazzolai, Innova- tive soft robots based on electro-rheological fluids, in 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (2012) pp. 4237–4242, iSSN: 2153- 0866

    2012

  9. [17]

    Choi, J.-Y

    S. Choi, J.-Y. Yook, M.-K. Choi, H. Nguyen, Y.-S. Lee, and M.-S. Han, Speed Control of DC Motor using Elec- trorheological Brake System, Journal of Intelligent Ma- terial Systems and Structures - J INTEL MAT SYST STRUCT 18, 1191 (2007)

    2007

  10. [18]

    Coursault, J.-F

    D. Coursault, J.-F. Blach, J. Grand, A. Coati, A. Vlad, B. Zappone, D. Babonneau, G. L´ evi, N. F´ elidj, B. Don- nio, J.-L. Gallani, M. Alba, Y. Garreau, Y. Borensztein, M. Goldmann, and E. Lacaze, Tailoring Anisotropic In- teractions between Soft Nanospheres Using Dense Arra...

    2015

  11. [19]

    Y. H. Kim, J.-O. Lee, H. S. Jeong, J. H. Kim, E. K. Yoon, D. K. Yoon, J.-B. Yoon, and H.-T. Jung, Optically selec- tive microlens photomasks using self-assembled smectic liquid crystal defect arrays, Advanced Materials (Deer- field Beach, Fla.) 22, 2416 (2010)

    2010

  12. [20]

    B. Son, S. Kim, Y. H. Kim, K. K¨ al¨ ant¨ ar, H.-M. Kim, H.- S. Jeong, S. Q. Choi, J. Shin, H.-T. Jung, and Y.-H. Lee, Optical vortex arrays from smectic liquid crystals, Optics Express 22, 4699 (2014), publisher: Optica Publishing Group

    2014

  13. [21]

    Yethiraj, Recent experimental developments at the nematic to smectic-a liquid crystal phase transition, in Thermotropic Liquid Crystals: Recent Advances, edited by A

    A. Yethiraj, Recent experimental developments at the nematic to smectic-a liquid crystal phase transition, in Thermotropic Liquid Crystals: Recent Advances, edited by A. Ramamoorthy (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht,

  14. [22]

    I. Gryn, E. Lacaze, L. Carbone, M. Giocondo, and B. Zappone, Electric-Field-Controlled Alignment of Rod- Shaped Fluorescent Nanocrystals in Smectic Liquid Crystal Defect Arrays, Advanced Functional Materials 26, 10.1002/adfm.201602729 (2016)

    2016 doi

  15. [23]

    Zappone, A

    B. Zappone, A. E. Mamuk, I. Gryn, V. Arima, A. Ziz- zari, R. Bartolino, E. Lacaze, and R. Petschek, Analogy between periodic patterns in thin smectic liquid crystal films and the intermediate state of superconductors, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, 1764...

    2020

  16. [24]

    Nefedov, O

    A. Nefedov, O. Petrov, V. Molotkov, and V. Fortov, For- mation of liquidlike and crystalline structures in dusty plasmas, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 29, 210 (2001), conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science

    2001

  17. [25]

    J. H. Chu and L. I, Direct observation of Coulomb crystals and liquids in strongly coupled rf dusty plas- mas, Physical Review Letters 72, 4009 (1994), publisher: American Physical Society

    1994

  18. [26]

    Thomas, G

    H. Thomas, G. E. Morfill, V. Demmel, J. Goree, B. Feuer- bacher, and D. M¨ ohlmann, Plasma Crystal: Coulomb Crystallization in a Dusty Plasma, Physical Review Let- ters 73, 652 (1994), publisher: American Physical Soci- ety

    1994

  19. [27]

    V. I. Molotkov, A. P. Nefedov, M. Y. Pustyl’nik, V. M. Torchinsky, V. E. Fortov, A. G. Khrapak, and K. Yoshino, Liquid plasma crystal: Coulomb crystalliza- tion of cylindrical macroscopic grains in a gas-discharge plasma, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters...

    2000

  20. [28]

    and cylindrical dust particles in DC discharges [29], [30]. In microgravity, dusty plasma has been shown to exhibit electrorheological (ER) effects, thus demon- strating its potential use as an analogue system for the study of phase transitions in ‘smart’ materials [31], [32],...

    2019

  21. [29]

    Hartmann, A

    P. Hartmann, A. Douglass, J. C. Reyes, L. S. Matthews, T. W. Hyde, A. Kov´ acs, and Z. Donk´ o, Crystallization Dynamics of a Single Layer Complex Plasma, Physical Review Letters 105, 115004 (2010), publisher: American Physical Society

    2010

  22. [30]

    Joshi, M

    E. Joshi, M. Y. Pustylnik, M. H. Thoma, H. M. Thomas, and M. Schwabe, Recrystallization in string-fluid com- plex plasmas, Physical Review Research 5, L012030 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Banu and C

    N. Banu and C. M. Tico¸ s, Precession of cylindrical dust particles in the plasma sheath, Physics of Plasmas 22, 103704 (2015), publisher: American Institute of Physics

    2015

  24. [32]

    V. E. Fortov, A. P. Nefedov, V. I. Molotkov, O. F. Petrov, M. Y. Poustylnik, V. M. Torchinsky, and A. G. Khrapak, Dusty plasmas in a dc glow discharge, AIP Conference Proceedings 649, 394 (2002), publisher: American Insti- tute of Physics

    2002

  25. [33]

    Khrapak, V

    A. Khrapak, V. Molotkov, A. Nefedov, V. Torchinsky, and K. Yoshino, Liquid and crystalline structures in dusty plasmas: dust liquid crystal, in Proceedings of 1999 IEEE 13th International Conference on Dielectric Liq- uids (ICDL’99) (Cat. No.99CH36213) (1999) pp. 657– 660

    1999

  26. [34]

    A. V. Ivlev, G. E. Morfill, H. M. Thomas, C. R¨ ath, G. Joyce, P. Huber, R. Kompaneets, V. E. Fortov, A. M. Lipaev, V. I. Molotkov, T. Reiter, M. Turin, and P. Vino- gradov, First Observation of Electrorheological Plasmas, Physical Review Letters 100, 095003 (2008), publisher:...

    2008

  27. [35]

    A. V. Ivlev, P. C. Brandt, G. E. Morfill, C. Rath, H. M. Thomas, G. Joyce, V. E. Fortov, A. M. Lipaev, V. I. Molotkov, and O. F. Petrov, Electrorheological Complex Plasmas, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 38, 733 (2010), conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science

    2010

  28. [36]

    Dietz, J

    C. Dietz, J. Budak, T. Kamprich, M. Kretschmer, and M. H. Thoma, Phase transition in electrorheological plas- mas, Contributions to Plasma Physics 61, e202100079 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    H. M. Thomas, G. E. Morfill, V. E. Fortov, A. V. Ivlev, V. I. Molotkov, A. M. Lipaev, T. Hagl, H. Rothermel, S. A. Khrapak, R. K. Suetterlin, M. Rubin-Zuzic, O. F. Petrov, V. I. Tokarev, and S. K. Krikalev, Complex plasma laboratory PK-3 Plus on the International Space Station...

    2008

  30. [38]

    M. Y. Pustylnik, M. A. Fink, V. Nosenko, T. Antonova, T. Hagl, H. M. Thomas, A. V. Zobnin, A. M. Lipaev, A. D. Usachev, V. I. Molotkov, O. F. Petrov, V. E. For- tov, C. Rau, C. Deysenroth, S. Albrecht, M. Kretschmer, M. H. Thoma, G. E. Morfill, R. Seurig, A. Stettner, V. A. Al...

    2016

  31. [39]

    Kompaneets, G

    R. Kompaneets, G. E. Morfill, and A. V. Ivlev, Design of new binary interaction classes in complex plasmas, Physics of Plasmas 16, 043705 (2009)

    2009

  32. [40]

    A. V. Ivlev, M. H. Thoma, C. R¨ ath, G. Joyce, and G. E. Morfill, Complex plasmas in external fields: the role of non-hamiltonian interactions, Physical Review Letters 106, 155001 (2011)

    2011

  33. [41]

    Vermillion, D

    K. Vermillion, D. Sanford, L. Matthews, P. Hart- mann, M. Rosenberg, E. Kostadinova, J. Carmona- Reyes, T. Hyde, A. M. Lipaev, A. D. Usachev, A. V. Zobnin, O. F. Petrov, M. H. Thoma, M. Y. Pustylnik, H. M. Thomas, and A. Ovchinin, Influence of temporal variations in plasma con...

    2022

  34. [42]

    L. S. Matthews, K. Vermillion, P. Hartmann, M. Rosen- berg, S. Rostami, E. G. Kostadinova, T. W. Hyde, M. Y. Pustylnik, A. M. Lipaev, A. D. Usachev, A. V. Zobnin, M. H. Thoma, O. F. Petrov, H. M. Thomas, and O. V. Novitskiy, Effect of ionization waves on dust chain for- mation...

    2021

  35. [43]

    Hartmann, M

    P. Hartmann, M. Rosenberg, Z. Juhasz, L. S. Matthews, D. L. Sanford, K. Vermillion, J. Carmona-Reyes, and T. W. Hyde, Ionization waves in the PK-4 direct current neon discharge, Plasma Sources Science and Technology 29, 115014 (2020), publisher: IOP Publishing

    2020

  36. [44]

    E. G. Kostadinova, K. Busse, C. D. Liaw, L. S. Matthews, and T. W. Hyde, Nematic transition in microgravity complex plasma liquid crystals (2018), presented at the 15th Dusty Plasma Workshop, Balti- more, Maryland, USA, Jun. 2018. [Online]. Available: https://wpdp.umbc.edu/fil...

    2018

  37. [45]

    Mitic, M

    S. Mitic, M. Y. Pustylnik, D. Erdle, A. M. Lipaev, A. D. Usachev, A. V. Zobnin, M. H. Thoma, H. M. Thomas, O. F. Petrov, V. E. Fortov, and O. Kononenko, Long-term evolution of the three-dimensional structure of string-fluid complex plasmas in the PK-4 experiment, Physical Revi...

    2021

  38. [46]

    M. Y. Pustylnik, B. Klumov, M. Rubin-Zuzic, A. M. Li- paev, V. Nosenko, D. Erdle, A. D. Usachev, A. V. Zobnin, V. I. Molotkov, G. Joyce, H. M. Thomas, M. H. Thoma, O. F. Petrov, V. E. Fortov, and O. Kononenko, Three- dimensional structure of a string-fluid complex plasma, Phys...

    2020

  39. [47]

    Yaroshenko and M

    V. Yaroshenko and M. Pustylnik, Possible Mechanisms of String Formation in Complex Plasmas at Elevated Pres- sures, Molecules 26, 308 (2021), number: 2 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute

    2021

  40. [48]

    Takahashi, M

    K. Takahashi, M. Tonouchi, S. Adachi, and H. Totsuji, Study of cylindrical dusty plasmas in pk-4j; experiments, Int. J. Microgravity Sci. Appl. 31, 4 (2014)

    2014

  41. [49]

    Totsuji, C

    H. Totsuji, C. Totsuji, K. Takahashi, and S. Adachi, Study of cylindrical dusty plasmas in pk-4j; theory and simulations, Int. J. Microgravity Sci. Appl. 31, 7 (2014)

    2014

  42. [50]

    A. P. Nefedov, G. E. Morfill, V. E. Fortov, H. M. Thomas, H. Rothermel, T. Hagl, A. V. Ivlev, M. Zuzic, B. A. Klu- mov, A. M. Lipaev, V. I. Molotkov, O. F. Petrov, Y. P. Gidzenko, S. K. Krikalev, W. Shepherd, A. I. Ivanov, M. Roth, H. Binnenbruck, J. A. Goree, and Y. P. Se- me...

    2003

  43. [51]

    Nitter, Levitation of dust in rf and dc glow discharges, Plasma Sources Science and Technology 5, 93 (1996)

    T. Nitter, Levitation of dust in rf and dc glow discharges, Plasma Sources Science and Technology 5, 93 (1996)

    1996

  44. [52]

    V. E. Fortov, A. V. Ivlev, S. A. Khrapak, A. G. Khrapak, and G. E. Morfill, Complex (dusty) plasmas: Current status, open issues, perspectives, Physics Reports 421, 1 (2005), aDS Bibcode: 2005PhR...421....1F

    2005

  45. [53]

    L. S. McCabe, J. Williams, S. C. Thakur, U. Konopka, E. Kostadinova, M. Pustylnik, H. Thomas, M. Thoma, and E. Thomas, Experiments and modeling of dust par- ticle heating resulting from changes in polarity switching in the pk-4 microgravity laboratory, Physics of Plasmas 32 (2025)

    2025

  46. [54]

    B. R. Andrew, L. Guazzotto, L. Matthews, H. Truell, and E. Kostadinova, Anisotropic anomalous diffusion in mi- crogravity dusty plasma. part one: Nonequilibrium sta- tistical analysis, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.15705 (2024). 19

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Shivanandan, A

    A. Shivanandan, A. Radenovic, and I. F. Sbalzarini, Mo- saicia: an imagej/fiji plugin for spatial pattern and inter- action analysis, BMC Bioinformatics 14, 349 (2013)

    2013

  48. [56]

    Schmidt and T

    J. Schmidt and T. W. Hyde, Discharge parameters of PlasmaKristall-4BU: A modifiable dusty plasma ex- periment, Review of Scientific Instruments 91, 083506 (2020), publisher: American Institute of Physics

    2020

  49. [57]

    L. S. Matthews, D. L. Sanford, E. G. Kostadinova, K. S. Ashrafi, E. Guay, and T. W. Hyde, Dust charging in dy- namic ion wakes, Physics of Plasmas 27, 023703 (2020), publisher: American Institute of Physics

    2020

  50. [58]

    Piel, Molecular dynamics simulation of ion flows around microparticles, Physics of Plasmas 24, 033712 (2017), publisher: American Institute of Physics

    A. Piel, Molecular dynamics simulation of ion flows around microparticles, Physics of Plasmas 24, 033712 (2017), publisher: American Institute of Physics

    2017

  51. [59]

    G. E. P. Box and M. E. Muller, A Note on the Genera- tion of Random Normal Deviates, The Annals of Mathe- matical Statistics 29, 610 (1958), publisher: Institute of Mathematical Statistics

    1958

  52. [60]

    Jaiswal, M

    S. Jaiswal, M. Pustylnik, S. Zhdanov, H. M. Thomas, A. Lipaev, A. Usachev, V. Molotkov, V. Fortov, M. Thoma, and O. Novitskii, Dust density waves in a dc flowing complex plasma with discharge polarity reversal, Physics of Plasmas 25 (2018)

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.