Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 41 references

Sharp H\"older regularity of weak solutions of the Neumann problem and applications to nonlocal PDE in metric measure spaces

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that weak solutions of the p-Laplacian Neumann problem with Morrey measure data on John domains in doubling metric measure spaces are Hölder continuous with the sharp Euclidean exponent (p+α)/(p−1), and that the same…

desk verdict A real sharp-exponent result in metric-space regularity, but the Adams-inequality step needs a dimensional hypothesis that the theorems never state. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.14950 v1 pith:BYC6I7VK submitted 2025-05-20 math.AP math.MG

Luca Capogna , Ryan Gibara , Riikka Korte , Nageswari Shanmugalingam This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath.MG MSC 30L9931E0535B6535R11
keywords doublingmetricmeasurespaceJohndomainfractionalp-LaplacianNeumannproblemHölderregularityMorreyspacessigneddataWienercriterion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that the sharp Hölder exponent known in the Euclidean setting for the p-Laplacian with measure data also holds in the more general setting of John domains in doubling metric measure spaces supporting a p-Poincaré inequality. For weak solutions of the Neumann problem with boundary data in a Morrey space $M^{{1,−(α+Θ)}}$, it proves that the solution is Hölder continuous on the entire domain with exponent (p+α)/(p−1) in (0,1), provided −p<α<−p(1−τ)−τ, where τ is the interior Hölder exponent. This improves the authors' earlier regularity estimates and matches the sharp Euclidean results. The same argument is applied to fractional powers of the p-Laplacian on compact doubling metric spaces, yielding the same sharp exponent for solutions of (−Δ_p)^θu=f. A converse asserts that for sign-definite data, λ-Hölder continuity forces the data into the corresponding Morrey class, so the exponent cannot be improved.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by an Adams-type Sobolev inequality for measures satisfying the decay condition |ν|(B(x,r))/μ(B(x,r)) ≤ Mr^α, imported from [34], which controls the $L^{{p*}}$ norm against |ν| by a constant times the L^p norm of the gradient. Around this, the paper uses the Hölder regularity theory of Cheeger p-harmonic functions from [31], including oscillation decay, gradient decay, and the interior exponent τ, together with a Maz'ya capacitary inequality, a covering-based p-fatness lemma for the boundary, and a Giaquinta-type iteration lemma adapted to doubling measures. The sharp exponent emerges when the decay index α is matched to the Morrey scale κ=α+1 in the iteration.

What would settle it

Verify Lemma 2.7 in the model case of a bounded interval with Lebesgue measure (where the lower mass-bound exponent is 1), p=2, and measure data satisfying (1.9) with α in (−2,−1−τ). If the claimed Sobolev exponent p*=tp(Q_μ+α)/(tQ_μ−p) is not a valid positive exponent because tQ_μ−p<0, or if the inequality is false, then the proof of Theorem 1.10 does not cover that space and the theorem's range of α is too broad.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the Hölder exponent of the solution is determined exactly by the Morrey decay of the data through the formula (p+α)/(p−1), both for the Neumann problem (Theorem 1.7) and for the induced fractional p-Laplacian (Theorem 4.4). Precisely, if f∈$M^{{1,−(α+Θ)}}$(∂Ω,ν) and −p<α<−p(1−τ)−τ, then u is (p+α)/(p−1)-Hölder continuous on Ω. The proof obtains a Morrey estimate |∇u|∈$M^{{p,(1+α)/(1−p)}}$ for the Cheeger gradient and then applies a Campanato-type integral characterization of Hölder continuity. The paper also proves a partial converse: if f has one sign and u is λ-Hölder continuous, then f lies in $M^{{1,−((λ(p−1)−p)+Θ)}}$, so the hypotheses are essentially optimal.

Load-bearing premise

The proof's central estimate depends on an Adams-type inequality that requires the measure of balls to grow fast enough with radius (the lower mass-bound exponent must exceed p) and the decay exponent α to keep the Sobolev exponent positive, but the paper never verifies these conditions from its structural hypotheses, so if they fail the main Hölder bound is not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the data f lies in L^q(∂Ω,ν) with q > (Q^∂_μ−Θ)/(p−Θ), then solutions are Hölder continuous with exponent min{τ, (q(p−Θ)−Q^∂_μ+Θ)/(q(p−1))}, which is strictly larger than the earlier exponent from [13] whenever q satisfies the stated bound.
  • For Morrey data with decay α in the allowed range, the Hölder exponent (p+α)/(p−1) holds up to the boundary on the entire John domain Ω, not just locally in the interior.
  • The converse part of Theorem 1.7 makes the Morrey condition necessary for sign-definite data: if u is λ-Hölder continuous, then f belongs to M^{1,−(α+Θ)} with α=λ(p−1)−p, so the forward exponent is sharp.
  • Solutions of the fractional p-Laplacian equation (−Δ_p)^θu=f on compact doubling metric measure spaces inherit the same Hölder exponent, matching the sharp Euclidean results of [10] and [1] in the corresponding parameter ranges.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The proof of the key Adams inequality (Lemma 2.7) carries hidden dimensional conditions: it requires tQ_μ−p>0 (and a positive Sobolev exponent p*), and these are not verified from the structural hypotheses (H0)–(H2); for spaces whose lower mass-bound exponent satisfies Q_μ≤p, such as one-dimensional domains with p=2, the inequality as stated may be invalid, so Theorem 1.10 is likely proved only fo
  • The paper's sharp forward and converse statements together suggest that, for sign-definite data, Morrey decay of f is not just sufficient but equivalent to λ-Hölder continuity of u with λ=(p+α)/(p−1); this could serve as a boundary regularity criterion for nonlocal equations once extended to the full range of λ.
  • Because the Morrey-to-Hölder step (Proposition 2.20) is purely integral, the same strategy could be adapted to prove Hölder continuity for other quasilinear problems with measure data in doubling spaces, provided an Adams-type inequality with the right dimension is available.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proves global Hölder regularity for weak solutions of the p-Laplacian Neumann problem with signed Radon measure data in John domains of doubling metric measure spaces supporting a p-Poincaré inequality, with boundary data in a Morrey class. The main results are Theorem 1.7, which gives the sharp Hölder exponent (p+alpha)/(p-1) for data in M^{1,-(alpha+Theta)} and a converse necessary condition, and Theorem 1.10, which establishes the underlying Morrey estimate for |nabla u| from the measure decay (1.9). The paper then applies these results to fractional p-Laplacian equations via the Caffarelli-Silvestre extension and compares the exponents with the Euclidean sharp results in the literature. The proofs are detailed, with Lemma 3.1 and Lemma 3.8 implementing a standard iteration.

Significance. If correct, the paper establishes a sharp, parameter-free regularity statement: the Hölder exponent is determined exactly by the Morrey decay exponent of the data, with no fitted constants, and a converse necessary condition is proved independently from [6, Lemma 4.8]. The improvement over the earlier exponent from [13] is explicit in (1.14), and the comparison with Euclidean sharp results in Section 5 is a useful benchmark. The manuscript is written with the main calculations displayed, and the iteration in Lemma 3.8 is carefully adapted to non-Ahlfors-regular measures. The central gap identified below, however, concerns the validity of the Adams inequality in Lemma 2.7 under the stated hypotheses, and it affects the proof of the main theorem for a nonempty class of admissible spaces.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2.6, Lemma 2.7; §3, Lemma 3.1; Theorem 1.10] Lemma 2.7 is stated with p* := tp(Q_mu + alpha)/(tQ_mu - p). For p* to be a finite positive Sobolev exponent one needs tQ_mu - p > 0 and Q_mu + alpha > 0. These conditions are not part of (H0)-(H2) and are not imposed in the statements of Theorem 1.10 or Theorem 1.7. They can fail for spaces that the paper itself treats in Section 5: for Omega = R^n x R_+ with dmu = y^a dx dy, taking n=1, a=0, p=3 gives Q_mu = 2 < p, so since t < p, tQ_mu - p < 0 for every admissible t. In that regime Lemma 2.7 cannot be applied, and the estimate (3.4) for the term I1, which is the only place where the Morrey decay (1.9) enters the gradient bound, is unjustified. Consequently Theorem 1.10 and Theorem 1.7(1) are unproved for admissible spaces with Q_mu <= p. The authors should either add a dimensional hypothesis (for example p < Q_mu together with alpha > -Q_mu) to the relevant statements, or provide an alternative argument that covers the case Q_mu <= p.
  2. [§1, discussion after Theorem 1.7] The sign identity comparing parts (1) and (2) is inconsistent: the text reads lambda(p-1)-p-Theta = alpha+Theta, but with alpha = (p-1)lambda - p the correct identity is lambda(p-1)-p+Theta = alpha+Theta. The proof of part (2) itself uses the correct expression, so this is a presentation error, but the displayed identity should be corrected.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2.5] The sentence referring to the Besov space B^{1-Theta/p}_{p,p}(partial Omega,nu) contains an unresolved cross-reference 'see Section??'.
  2. [§2.6, proof of Lemma 2.13] The constant c(eta) is introduced without definition; the convergence factor sum_j 2^{-j eta} should be written out explicitly.
  3. [Abstract] The phrase 'We prove global Hölder regularity result' should read 'a global Hölder regularity result'.
  4. [§5, Remark 5.3] The phrase 'the optimal lower mass bound exponent for the boundary 2.2' should refer to equation (2.2) explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the Hölder exponent is forced by the Morrey decay and comparison estimates; the flagged Lemma 2.7 dimensional condition is a correctness gap, not circularity.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is not circular. Theorem 1.7(1) follows from Corollary 1.11 and Theorem 1.10, whose proof reduces the Morrey decay of |∇u| to an estimate of the form ∫_{B(x0,r)} |∇u|^p dμ ≤ C r^{p(1+α)/(p-1)} via Lemma 3.1 and Lemma 3.8. No constant in this chain is fitted to the target Hölder exponent; the exponent (p+α)/(p-1) is algebraically determined by the Morrey decay parameter α and the p-Laplacian structure. The converse, Theorem 1.7(2), is an independent necessary condition based on [6, Lemma 4.8], which is a published external lemma (with one coauthor overlapping) and not a re-statement of the forward direction. The Euclidean sharp results [10,7,1] are used as external benchmarks, not as inputs. The paper's self-citations to [12,13] support the nonlocal application's variational equivalence and earlier regularity results, but the main Neumann regularity proof does not reduce to those citations. The genuine concern raised by the skeptical reading is the unverified dimensional condition tQ_μ − p > 0 in Lemma 2.7; if this condition fails, the Adams inequality cannot be applied and Theorem 1.10 is not proved for spaces with Q_μ ≤ p. That is a proof gap affecting correctness, not a circularity in the sense of the derivation being equivalent to its inputs. Hence the circularity score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No constants are fitted to data; the structural parameters Theta, Q_mu, tau, delta_F are inputs from the hypotheses or from the cited geometry of the space. The Holder exponent is a function of the data's Morrey exponent alpha, not a fitted quantity. The paper introduces no new objects; the fractional p-Laplacian and the hyperbolic filling construction are taken from prior work [12,13,5].

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Omega is a John domain (H0), with a John center and John constant.
    Used to set up boundary trace theory and localization near the boundary; stated in the structure hypotheses.
  • domain assumption (Omega, d, mu|Omega) is doubling and supports a p-Poincare inequality (H1).
    Provides the p-harmonic interior regularity tau from [31] and the lower mass bound (2.1); assumed throughout.
  • domain assumption The boundary partial Omega is complete, uniformly perfect, and carries a Theta-codimensional Radon measure nu with 0 < Theta < p (H2).
    Ensures the Morrey condition on the boundary is equivalent to the decay condition (1.9) via Lemma 2.17, and enables the uniform p-fatness Lemma 2.13.
  • standard math A Cheeger differentiable structure exists on Omega and the p-energy can be expressed with Cheeger gradients.
    Invoked in the definition of the p-Laplace equation and in the comparison estimates; existence is from Cheeger [14].
  • domain assumption The Adams inequality (Lemma 2.7) is valid for the exponent p* = tp(Q_mu + alpha)/(tQ_mu - p), requiring tQ_mu > p and Q_mu + alpha > 0.
    Cited from [34] and used in Lemma 3.1 to bound the integral of (u-v) dnu; the paper does not verify these dimensional inequalities from (H0)-(H2).
  • standard math Cheeger p-harmonic functions satisfy the decay estimates of Lemma 2.8 and Lemma 2.12 with interior Holder exponent tau > 0.
    These follow from [31, Theorem 5.2] and are used throughout the iteration.
  • domain assumption Every doubling metric measure space (Z, d_Z, nu) is the boundary of a uniform domain Omega with structural conditions (H0)-(H2) and Theta = p(1-theta).
    Inherited from [5] and used in Section 4 to convert fractional p-Laplacian equations into Neumann problems.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Sharp H\"older regularity of weak solutions of the Neumann problem and applications to nonlocal PDE in metric measure spaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BYC6I7VK

@misc{pith2026250514950,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Sharp H\"older regularity of weak solutions of the Neumann problem and applications to nonlocal PDE in metric measure spaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BYC6I7VK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.14950}
}
abstract

We prove global H\"older regularity result for weak solutions $u\in N^{1,p}(\Omega, \mu)$ to a PDE of $p$-Laplacian type with a measure as non-homogeneous term: \[ -\text{div}\!\left( |\nabla u|^{p-2}\nabla u \right)=\overline\nu, \] where $1<p<\infty$ and $\overline\nu \in (N^{1,p}(\Omega,\mu))^*$ is a signed Radon measure supported in $\overline \Omega$. Here, $\Omega$ is a John domain in a metric measure space satisfying a doubling condition and a $p$-Poincar\'e inequality, and $\nabla u$ is the Cheeger gradient. The regularity results obtained in this paper improve on earlier estimates proved by the authors in \cite{CGKS} for the study of the Neumann problem, and have applications to the regularity of solutions of nonlocal PDE in doubling metric spaces. Moreover, the obtained H\"older exponent matches with the known sharp result in the Euclidean case \cite{CSt,BLS,BT}.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Biswas, E

    A. Biswas, E. Topp:Lipschitz regularity of fractionalp-Laplacian. Preprint,arXiv:2504.09457v1 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  2. [13]

    Capogna, J

    L. Capogna, J. Kline, R. Korte, N. Shanmugalingam, M. Snipes:Neumann problems forp-harmonic functions, and induced nonlocal operators in metric measure spaces,to appear in American Jour. Math

    work page

  3. [2]

    Björn, J

    A. Björn, J. Björn:Nonlinear potential theory on metric spaces. EMS Tracts in Mathematics, 17. European Mathematical Society (EMS), Zürich, 2011. xii+403 pp

    work page 2011

  4. [3]

    Björn:Boundary continuity for quasiminimizers on metric spaces.Illinois J

    A. Björn:Boundary continuity for quasiminimizers on metric spaces.Illinois J. Math.46(2002), no. 2, 38–403

    work page 2002

  5. [4]

    Björn, J

    A. Björn, J. Björn, N. Shanmugalingam:Extension and trace results for doubling metric measure spaces and their hyperbolic fillings.J. Math. Pures Appl.159(2022), 196–249

    work page 2022

  6. [5]

    Björn, J

    A. Björn, J. Björn, N. Shanmugalingam:The Liouville theorem forp-harmonic functions and quasi- minimizers with finite energy.Mathematische Zeitschrift297(2021), 827–854

    work page 2021

  7. [6]

    Björn, P

    J. Björn, P. MacManus, N. Shanmugalingam:Fat sets and pointwise boundary estimates for p-harmonic functions in metric spaces.J. Anal. Math.85(2001), 339–369

    work page 2001

  8. [7]

    Brasco, E

    L. Brasco, E. Lindgren and A. Schikorra, Higher Hölder regularity for the fractionalp-Laplacian in the superquadratic case, Adv. Math.338(2018), 782–846

    work page 2018

Show all 41 references
  1. [8]

    Caffarelli, L

    L. Caffarelli, L. Silvestre:An extension problem related to the fractional Laplacian.Comm. Partial Differential Equations32(2007), no. 7-9, 1245–1260

    2007

  2. [9]

    Caffarelli, M

    L. Caffarelli, M. Soria-Carro:On a family of fully nonlinear integro-differential operators: From frac- tional Laplacian to nonlocal Monge-Ampère.Anal. PDE17(2024), no. 1, 243–279. SHARP HÖLDER EXPONENT FOR THE NEUMANN PROBLEM 27

    2024

  3. [10]

    Caffarelli, P

    L. Caffarelli, P. Stinga:Fractional elliptic equations, Caccioppoli estimates and regularity.Ann. I. H. Poincaré: Analyse non linéaire33(2016), 767–807

    2016

  4. [11]

    Campanato:Proprietà di hölderianità di alcune classi di funzioni.Ann

    S. Campanato:Proprietà di hölderianità di alcune classi di funzioni.Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. (3)17(1963), 175–188

    1963

  5. [12]

    Capogna, R

    L. Capogna, R. Gibara, R. Korte, N. Shanmugalingam:Fractionalp-Laplacians via Neumann problems in unbounded metric measure spaces.Preprint,arXiv:2410.18883(2024)

    2024

  6. [14]

    Cheeger:Differentiability of Lipschitz functions on metric measure spaces

    J. Cheeger:Differentiability of Lipschitz functions on metric measure spaces. Geom. Funct. Anal.9 (1999), no. 3, 428–517

    1999

  7. [15]

    Danielli:Regularity at the boundary for solutions of nonlinear subelliptic equations.Indiana Univ

    D. Danielli:Regularity at the boundary for solutions of nonlinear subelliptic equations.Indiana Univ. Math. J.44(1995), no. 1, 269–286

    1995

  8. [16]

    Da Prato:SpaziL (p,θ)(Ω, δ)e loro proprietà.Ann

    G. Da Prato:SpaziL (p,θ)(Ω, δ)e loro proprietà.Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4)69(1965), 383–392

    1965

  9. [17]

    H. Dong, D. Kim:OnL p-estimates for a class of non-local elliptic equations.J. Funct. Anal.262 (2012), 1166–1199

    2012

  10. [18]

    H. Dong, H. Zhu:Gradient estimates for singularp-Laplace type equations with measure data.J. Eur. Math. Soc.26(2024), 3939–3985

    2024

  11. [19]

    Fernández-Real and X

    X. Fernández-Real and X. Ros-Oton,Integro-differential elliptic equations, Progress in Mathematics, 350, Birkhäuser/Springer, Cham, [2024]©2024

    2024

  12. [20]

    Garain, E

    P. Garain, E. Lindgren:Higher Hölder regularity for the fractionalp-Laplace equation in the sub- quadratic case.Math. Ann.390(2024), no. 4, 5753–5792

    2024

  13. [21]

    Giaquinta:Multiple integrals in the calculus of variations and nonlinear elliptic systems.The Annals of Mathematics Studies, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ (1983)

    M. Giaquinta:Multiple integrals in the calculus of variations and nonlinear elliptic systems.The Annals of Mathematics Studies, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ (1983)

    1983

  14. [22]

    Gibara, N

    R. Gibara, N. Shanmugalingam:Conformal transformation of uniform domains under weights that depend on distance to the boundary. Anal. Geom. Metr. Spaces,10no. 1 (2022), 297–312

    2022

  15. [23]

    Gibara, N

    R. Gibara, N. Shanmugalingam:Trace and extension theorems for homogeneous Sobolev and Besov spaces for unbounded uniform domains in metric measure spaces. Proc. Steklov Inst. Math.323(2023) 101–119

    2023

  16. [24]

    Gibara, R

    R. Gibara, R. Korte, N. Shanmugalingam:Solving a Dirichlet problem for unbounded domains via a conformal transformation.Math. Ann.389(2024), 2857–2901

    2024

  17. [25]

    Hajłasz, P

    P. Hajłasz, P. Koskela:Sobolev met Poincaré. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc.145(2000), no. 688, x+101 pp

    2000

  18. [26]

    Heinonen:Lecture notes on analysis in metric spaces.Springer Universitext, Springer Verlag New York (2001)

    J. Heinonen:Lecture notes on analysis in metric spaces.Springer Universitext, Springer Verlag New York (2001)

    2001

  19. [27]

    Heinonen, P

    J. Heinonen, P. Koskela:Quasiconformal maps in metric spaces with controlled geometry. Acta Math. 181(1998), no. 1, 1–61

    1998

  20. [28]

    Heinonen, P

    J. Heinonen, P. Koskela, N. Shanmugalingam, J. Tyson:Sobolev spaces on metric measure spaces: an approach based on upper gradients.New Mathematical Monographs27, Cambridge University Press (2015), i–xi+448

    2015

  21. [29]

    Keith, X

    S. Keith, X. Zhong:The Poincaré inequality is an open ended condition.Ann. of Math. (2)167(2008), no. 2, 575–599

    2008

  22. [30]

    Kinnunen, V

    J. Kinnunen, V. Latvala:Lebesgue points for Sobolev functions on metric spaces.Rev. Mat. Iberoamer- icana18(2002), no. 3, 685–700

    2002

  23. [31]

    Kinnunen, N

    J. Kinnunen, N. Shanmugalingam:Regularity of quasi-minimizers on metric spaces.Manuscripta Math. 105(2001), 401–423

    2001

  24. [32]

    Koskela, K

    P. Koskela, K. Rajala, N. Shanmugalingam:Lipschitz continuity of Cheeger-harmonic functions in metric measure spaces.J. Funct. Anal.202(2003), no. 1, 147–173

    2003

  25. [33]

    J. L. Lewis:Uniformly fat sets.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.308(1988), no. 1, 177–196

    1988

  26. [34]

    Mäkäläinen:Adams inequality on metric measure spaces.Rev

    T. Mäkäläinen:Adams inequality on metric measure spaces.Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana25(2009), 533–558. 28 LUCA CAPOGNA, RYAN GIBARA, RIIKKA KORTE, AND NAGESW ARI SHANMUGALINGAM

    2009

  27. [35]

    Mäkäläinen:Removable sets for Hölder continuousp-harmonic functions on metric measure spaces

    T. Mäkäläinen:Removable sets for Hölder continuousp-harmonic functions on metric measure spaces. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math.33(2008), 605–624

    2008

  28. [36]

    Malý:Trace and extension theorems for Sobolev-type functions in metric spaces.Preprint, arXiv:1704.06344(2017)

    L. Malý:Trace and extension theorems for Sobolev-type functions in metric spaces.Preprint, arXiv:1704.06344(2017)

    2017 arXiv

  29. [37]

    C. B. Morrey Jr.:On the solutions of quasi-linear elliptic partial differential equations.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 43 (1938), no. 1, 126–166

    1938

  30. [38]

    C. B. Morrey Jr.:Second order elliptic equations in several variables and Hölder continuity, Math. Z. 72(1959/60), 146–164

    1959

  31. [39]

    Ono:Hölder continuity of solutions to quasilinear elliptic equations with measure data.Advanced Studies in Pure Mathematics44, Potential Theory in Matsue (2006), 327–338

    T. Ono:Hölder continuity of solutions to quasilinear elliptic equations with measure data.Advanced Studies in Pure Mathematics44, Potential Theory in Matsue (2006), 327–338

    2006

  32. [40]

    Shanmugalingam:Some convergence results forp-harmonic functions on metric measure spaces

    N. Shanmugalingam:Some convergence results forp-harmonic functions on metric measure spaces. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3)87(2003), 226–246

    2003

  33. [41]

    Shanmugalingam:Harmonic functions on metric spaces.Illinois J

    N. Shanmugalingam:Harmonic functions on metric spaces.Illinois J. Math.45(2001), no. 3, 1021– 1050. Department of Mathematical Sciences, Smith College, Northampton, MA, 01060, USA Email address:lcapogna@smith.edu Department of Mathematics, Physics and Geology, Cape Breton Univ...

    2001

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.