Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 67 references

On the optimal Sobolev threshold for evolution equations with rough nonlinearities

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims to settle the sharp Sobolev regularity boundary for rough nonlinear heat and Schrödinger equations.

desk verdict Deep and likely mostly correct results on optimal Sobolev thresholds, but the ill-posedness half has a real gap for even p and the NLH proof is a copy-paste of NLS. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.14966 v1 pith:2KNC3ITS submitted 2025-05-20 math.AP

Ben Pineau , Mitchell A. Taylor This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35A0135B6535K5835Q55
keywords nonlinearSchrödingerequationheatwell-posednessill-posednessroughnonlinearitySobolevthresholdcompositionestimatespower
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

For evolution equations with the rough power nonlinearity $|u|^{p-1}u$, the central question is: in which Sobolev spaces do solutions exist and depend continuously on the data? This paper claims to settle that question for the nonlinear heat equation and the nonlinear Schrödinger equation, two model cases that had resisted a sharp answer for non-algebraic $p>1$. It proves that the heat equation is locally well-posed in $W^{s,q}$ exactly when $\max\{0,s_c\}

What carries the argument

The engine of the paper is a sharp nonlinear estimate for complex-valued functions, proved as Theorem 3.1: for $p\le s<p+\frac{1}{q}$, there holds $\|\,|u|^{p-1}u\,\|_{W^{s,q}} \lesssim \|u\|^{p-1}_{W^{1/q+\varepsilon,q}}\|u\|_{W^{s,q}}$. The proof replaces $u$ by dyadic piecewise-linear approximations, so that the only dangerous contribution to the $W^{s,q}$ norm of $|u|^{p-1}u$ comes from intervals where $u$ crosses zero; on those intervals finite-difference comparisons and a precise power-type estimate in the change of variables show the loss of one full $1/q$ derivative that the classical chain rule misses. The non-existence half rests on a one-dimensional integral-equation lemma: for data proportional to $\chi(x)x$, the differentiated nonlinearity develops a finite difference of size $t|x|^{p-n}$ at the origin, which cannot belong to $W^{p+1/q-n,q}$; a slicing theorem then carries this obstruction to every dimension.

What would settle it

Choose a non-integer power such as $p=1.5$, set $q=2$, take the one-dimensional integral equation (6.1) with data $w_0=\delta\chi(x)x$ and $h=0$, and compute the leading finite difference $I(t,x+h)-I(t,x)$ at small time, $x=1$, and $h=x/2$; the proof requires the ratio $|I(t,x+h)-I(t,x)|/(t|x|^{p-n})$ to be comparable to 1 with a strictly smaller remainder. If the ratio is not of that form, the load-bearing lemma fails. Alternatively, test the even-integer endpoint $p=2$: a solution in $C([0,T];W^{3,2}(\mathbb{R}))$ for this data would disprove the claimed 'similar result' for even $p$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that the true Sobolev regularity of the power nonlinearity $u\mapsto|u|^{p-1}u$ is governed by the zero set of $u$ rather than by the pointwise smoothness of the function $z\mapsto|z|^{p-1}z$, and that this extra derivative gain moves the optimal well-posedness boundary for the heat equation to $s< p+2+\frac{1}{q}$ and for the Schrödinger equation to $s< \min\{p+\frac52,2p+1\}$. Concretely, the heat equation is locally well-posed in $W^{s,q}(\mathbb{R}^d)$ for $\max\{0,s_c\}<s<p+2+\frac{1}{q}$, and for $p-1\notin 2\mathbb{N}$ there is smooth, small, compactly supported data for which no solution exists in $C([0,T];W^{s,q})$ at any $s\ge\max\{s_c,p+2+\frac{1}{q}\}$. The Schrödinger equation is locally well-posed in $H^s(\mathbb{R}^d)$ for $\max\{0,s_c\}<s<\min\{p+\frac52,2p+1\}$, and for $p-1\notin 2\mathbb{N}$ the same non-existence holds at $s\ge\max\{s_c,p+\frac52\}$; a separate one-dimensional argument improves the upper bound to $\min\{3p,p+\frac52\}$. Because the ill-posedness boundary is dimension-independent, the paper concludes that for $d\gg p$ there are nonlinear Schrödinger equations ill-posed in every Sobolev space $H^s(\mathbb{R}^d)$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that, for data that is a small multiple of a cutoff function times $x$, the dominant change in the differentiated nonlinearity across a small shift is exactly proportional to $t|x|^{p-n}$, with all remainders strictly smaller; if this one-dimensional estimate fails for any $p$, the non-existence results in all dimensions collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For the nonlinear heat equation with $1<p<\infty$, local well-posedness holds in $W^{s,q}$ for every $s$ between the scaling threshold and $p+2+\frac{1}{q}$, and fails for every $s$ at or above that boundary when $p-1$ is not an even integer.
  • For the nonlinear Schrödinger equation, once $p\ge\frac{3}{2}$ the sharp high-regularity boundary is $p+\frac52$; above it, smooth small data fail to yield any solution in $H^s$.
  • For $1<p<\frac{3}{2}$, the paper still proves well-posedness up to $\min\{p+\frac52,2p+1\}$, and in one dimension the boundary improves to $\min\{3p,p+\frac52\}$, showing that Strichartz integrability can improve high-regularity results.
  • Because the ill-posedness threshold is dimension-independent while the scaling threshold $s_c$ grows with dimension, there are nonlinear Schrödinger equations that are ill-posed in every Sobolev space $H^s$.
  • The same refined nonlinear estimate is expected to set sharp thresholds for other equations with order-$\alpha$ dispersion and limited-regularity nonlinearities: well-posedness up to $s<\alpha+\mu$, and in dispersive cases up to $\min\{\alpha\mu,\alpha+\mu\}$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the same one-dimensional zero-crossing mechanism should trigger non-existence at the boundary for any smooth datum with a simple transverse zero, not only the modeled cutoff data $\chi(x)x$.
  • Beyond the paper: completing the asserted even-integer endpoint of the one-dimensional lemma would extend the ill-posedness theorems to algebraic powers such as $p=2$, closing the last excluded range.
  • Beyond the paper: the composition estimate should transfer to derivative nonlinearities such as $|u|^{2\sigma}\partial_x u$, where the same one-derivative gain predicts sharp high-regularity thresholds of the form $2\sigma+\frac52$ and $4\sigma+1$.
  • Beyond the paper: the endpoint shift by $1/q$ can be read as a dimensional-reduction effect, since in large dimension the boundary $p+2+1/q$ approaches $p+2$; this predicts that the same one-dimensional cancellation should control the sharp threshold for more general semilinear parabolic systems.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper develops a general heuristic for the maximal Sobolev regularity of semilinear evolution equations with rough power nonlinearities and implements it for the nonlinear heat equation (NLH) and the nonlinear Schrödinger equation (NLS). The main positive results are the nonlinear estimate Theorem 3.1, the well-posedness theorems for NLH (Theorem 1.13/4.1) and NLS (Theorem 1.12/5.1), the one-dimensional improvement Theorem 1.14/5.10, and the non-existence theorems Theorem 1.5/6.2 for NLS and Theorem 1.6/6.1 for NLH. The ill-posedness arguments rest on a one-dimensional Lemma 6.4, which is then lifted to higher dimensions by a Fubini-type theorem (Theorem 6.6). The paper also draws corollaries such as the existence of NLS equations ill-posed in every Sobolev space (Corollary 1.9).

Significance. If the stated theorems are correct, the paper resolves a longstanding open problem by identifying the optimal Sobolev threshold for a non-algebraic power nonlinearity, and it introduces a new nonlinear estimate for complex-valued functions that is likely to be influential. The paper is commendable for deriving thresholds from estimates rather than fitting parameters, for explicitly separating heuristics from proofs, and for including detailed a priori bounds. However, the sharpness claims for even integer powers are not proven as written, and the proof of Theorem 6.1 contains a sign/copy-paste error that affects the derivation of the one-dimensional integral equation. These issues are load-bearing for the central claims, so the paper requires a major revision rather than acceptance in its current form.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 6, Lemma 6.4] The proof of Lemma 6.4 is carried out for p in (n, n+1-1/q) and then extended to all p in (n, n+1) by choosing q* large enough; this extension collapses when p = n+1, i.e., when p is an integer. Since the hypotheses of Theorems 6.1 and 6.2 are p-1 not in 2N, the values p = 2, 4, 6, ... are covered by the stated theorems, and p = 2 is explicitly featured in Corollary 1.9 and in the discussion of the questions from [16,17]. The sentence 'a similar result holds when p is an even integer' leaves the entire endpoint argument to the reader, and the endpoint mechanism is genuinely different because the leading singularity of |w|^{p-1}w at p = 2 is a jump in the second derivative rather than a fractional-power singularity. This is a load-bearing gap: without a proof for even integer p, the claimed sharp ill-posedness threshold for even p is not established.
  2. [Proof of Theorem 6.1 (Section 6.1)] In the proof of Theorems 6.1 and 6.2, the function f is defined by f(t,x) = u - u0 + i ∫ |u|^{p-1}u ds + i ∫ Δu ds and the text says 'since u is a solution to (NLS)'. Theorem 6.1 is the nonlinear heat equation, for which the correct identity is f = u - u0 - ∫ (|u|^{p-1}u + Δu) ds, with no factor i. As written, the displayed identity is consistent only with (NLS), so the proof does not establish Theorem 6.1. This is not a cosmetic typo: the reduction to the one-dimensional integral equation (6.1) with h = Δu depends on the sign and the factor i in this identity. The proof of Theorem 6.2 should also be written for the Schrödinger equation explicitly rather than being asserted by 'identical reasoning'.
  3. [Section 3, Proposition 3.4(i)] Proposition 3.4(i) is a key technical input in the proof of the main nonlinear estimate Theorem 3.1; it is used, for example, in summing the terms J^1_jk and the analogous estimates on the sets B^2_k. Its proof is only an outline that refers to arguments on pages 64-65 of [49] and to [31, Lemma 3.9]. Given that Theorem 3.1 underpins all well-posedness theorems in the paper, the proof of Proposition 3.4(i) should either be written out in full or the precise quoted result should be reproduced, together with a verification that the hypotheses are satisfied in the complex-valued setting used here.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Lemma 6.5] The statement of Lemma 6.5 concludes |I(t,x+h)-I(t,x)| ≈ t|x|^{p-n}, but the final line of the proof says '≈ t|x|^{p-1}'; the exponent should be p-n.
  2. [Section 6.1] The assertion that Δu is odd in x1 should be justified, since the reduction to Lemma 6.4 uses the condition h(t,0,x') = 0; a one-line argument using uniqueness and the oddness of the initial datum would suffice.
  3. [References] In Section 2.2.1, the text attributes a result to 'Killip and Visan from [65, Appendix A]', but reference [65] is Visan's thesis; please check whether the intended citation is [65] or a different work by Killip and Visan.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: thresholds are derived from independent nonlinear estimates and ill-posedness mechanisms; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are not circular. The well-posedness thresholds are obtained from explicit a priori estimates (Theorem 3.1, Proposition 4.7, Section 5.2) and the ill-posedness thresholds from an explicit one-dimensional nonexistence mechanism (Lemma 6.4) combined with the Fubini-type Theorem 6.6. There is no fitting step: the paper presents heuristics as predictions (e.g., Section 1.1) and then proves them, rather than defining the threshold in terms of the quantity being predicted. The only self-citation of consequence is [53, Proposition 2.9] used to prove Proposition 2.1, a standard vector-valued Bernstein/Littlewood–Paley estimate; this is independent of the target well-posedness results and is not load-bearing in the sense of assuming the paper's conclusions. The even-integer endpoint p ∈ 2N is left 'to the reader' in Lemma 6.4 and is therefore an omitted proof / completeness gap, not a circular reduction; similarly, the copy-paste of the (NLS) integral identity in the proof of Theorem 6.1 is a typographical defect, not a circular argument. No step was found in which an equation is equal to its input by construction, or in which a fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, or in which the central premise depends on an unverified self-citation. Thus the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters or invented physical entities. It relies on standard tools from harmonic analysis and PDE theory, all cited. The mathematical devices (time truncation, low/high modulation projectors, frequency envelopes) are proof tools, not new postulates.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Boundedness of the superposition operator u maps to |u| on Besov spaces B^{s}_{q,r}(R) for s < 1+1/q (Theorem 1.10, due to Bourdaud-Meyer [3] and Oswald [49]).
    Used to motivate and partially prove the main nonlinear estimate Theorem 3.1; the proof of the comparison estimates in Proposition 3.4 relies on Oswald's Proposition 2.
  • standard math Strichartz estimates for the linear Schrödinger equation, including endpoint cases (Theorem 2.9).
    Used throughout Section 5 to estimate the solution and the truncated nonlinearity in spacetime norms.
  • standard math Sobolev embedding, Littlewood-Paley theory, Bernstein inequalities, fractional Leibniz/Kato-Ponce rules, and Moser estimates.
    Systematically used in Sections 3 and 5 to control nonlinear expressions in W^{s,q} and H^s.
  • standard math Fubini-type characterization of Sobolev norms on R^d via line restrictions (Theorem 6.6, due to Strichartz [55]).
    Reduces the d-dimensional ill-posedness theorems to the one-dimensional Lemma 6.4.
  • standard math Frequency envelopes of Tao [59] and the telescoping estimate for continuous dependence.
    Used in Section 5.3 to prove continuity of the data-to-solution map without a Lipschitz nonlinearity bound.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the optimal Sobolev threshold for evolution equations with rough nonlinearities." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2KNC3ITS

@misc{pith2026250514966,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the optimal Sobolev threshold for evolution equations with rough nonlinearities},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2KNC3ITS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.14966}
}
abstract

In this article we are concerned with evolution equations of the form \begin{equation*} \partial_tu-A(D)u=F(u,\overline{u},\nabla u, \nabla \overline{u}) \end{equation*} where $A(D)$ is a Fourier multiplier of either dispersive or parabolic type and the nonlinear term $F$ is of limited regularity. Our objective is to develop a robust set of principles which can be used in many cases to predict the \emph{highest} Sobolev exponent $s=s(q,d)$ for which the above evolution is well-posed in $W_x^{s,q}(\mathbb{R}^d)$ (necessarily restricting to $q=2$ for dispersive problems). We will confirm the validity of these principles for two of the most important model problems; namely, the nonlinear Schr\"odinger and heat equations. More precisely, we will prove that the nonlinear heat equation \begin{equation*} \partial_tu-\Delta u=\pm |u|^{p-1}u, \hspace{5mm} p>1, \end{equation*} is well-posed in $W_x^{s,q}(\mathbb{R}^d)$ when $\max\{0,s_c\}<s<2+p+\frac{1}{q}$ and is \emph{strongly ill-posed} when $s\geq \max\{s_c,2+p+\frac{1}{q}\}$ and $p-1\not\in 2\mathbb{N}$ in the sense of non-existence of solutions even for smooth, small and compactly supported data. When $q=2$, we establish the same ill-posedness result for the nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation and the corresponding well-posedness result when $p\geq \frac{3}{2}$. Identifying the optimal Sobolev threshold for even a single non-algebraic $p>1$ was a rather longstanding open problem in the literature. As an immediate corollary of the fact that our ill-posedness threshold is dimension independent, we may conclude by taking $d\gg p$ that there are nonlinear Schr\"odinger equations which are ill-posed in \emph{every} Sobolev space $H_x^s(\mathbb{R}^d)$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [49]

    On the boundedness of the mapping f → |f | in Besov spaces

    Patrick Oswald. On the boundedness of the mapping f → |f | in Besov spaces. Comment. Math. Univ. Carolin. , 33(1):57–66, 1992

    work page 1992

  2. [1]

    Calcul symbolique et propagation des singular it´ es pour les ´ equations aux d´ eriv´ ees partielles non lin´ eaires.Ann

    Jean-Michel Bony. Calcul symbolique et propagation des singular it´ es pour les ´ equations aux d´ eriv´ ees partielles non lin´ eaires.Ann. Sci. ´Ecole Norm. Sup. (4) , 14(2):209–246, 1981

    work page 1981

  3. [2]

    A sharpness result for powers of Besov fu nctions

    G´ erard Bourdaud. A sharpness result for powers of Besov fu nctions. J. Funct. Spaces Appl. , 2(3):267–277, 2004

    work page 2004

  4. [3]

    Fonctions qui op` erent sur les espaces de Sobolev

    G´ erard Bourdaud and Yves Meyer. Fonctions qui op` erent sur les espaces de Sobolev. J. Funct. Anal. , 97(2):351– 360, 1991

    work page 1991

  5. [4]

    Compos ition operators on Lizorkin-Triebel spaces

    G´ erard Bourdaud, Madani Moussai, and Winfried Sickel. Compos ition operators on Lizorkin-Triebel spaces. J. Funct. Anal., 259(5):1098–1128, 2010

    work page 2010

  6. [5]

    Compos ition operators acting on Besov spaces on the real line

    G´ erard Bourdaud, Madani Moussai, and Winfried Sickel. Compos ition operators acting on Besov spaces on the real line. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4) , 193(5):1519–1554, 2014

    work page 2014

  7. [6]

    On nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations

    Jean Bourgain. On nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations. In Les relations entre les math´ ematiques et la physique th´ eorique, pages 11–21. Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci., Bures-sur-Yvette, 1998

    work page 1998

  8. [7]

    Scattering in the energy space and below for 3D N LS

    Jean Bourgain. Scattering in the energy space and below for 3D N LS. J. Anal. Math. , 75:267–297, 1998

    work page 1998

Show all 67 references
  1. [8]

    Global solutions of nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations, volume 46 of American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications

    Jean Bourgain. Global solutions of nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations, volume 46 of American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1999

    1999

  2. [9]

    On the global Cauchy problem for the nonlinear Sc hr¨ odinger equation.Proc

    Jean Bourgain. On the global Cauchy problem for the nonlinear Sc hr¨ odinger equation.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99(24):15262–15268, 2002

    2002

  3. [10]

    Construction of blowup solu tions for the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with critical nonlinearity

    Jean Bourgain and Wensheng Wang. Construction of blowup solu tions for the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with critical nonlinearity. Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. (4) , 25(1-2):197–215, 1997

    1997

  4. [11]

    Guher Camliyurt and Carlos E. Kenig. Scattering for radial boun ded solutions of focusing supercritical wave equations in odd dimensions. Nonlinear Anal., 236:Paper No. 113352, 76, 2023

    2023

  5. [12]

    Semilinear Schr¨ odinger equations, volume 10 of Courant Lecture Notes in Mathematics

    Thierry Cazenave. Semilinear Schr¨ odinger equations, volume 10 of Courant Lecture Notes in Mathematics . New York University, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences , New York; American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2003

    2003

  6. [13]

    Weissler

    Thierry Cazenave, Fl´ avio Dickstein, and Fred B. Weissler. Non- regularity in H¨ older and Sobolev spaces of solutions to the semilinear heat and Schr¨ odinger equations. Nagoya Math. J. , 226:44–70, 2017

    2017

  7. [14]

    Continuous dependence for NLS in fractional order spaces

    Thierry Cazenave, Daoyuan Fang, and Zheng Han. Continuous dependence for NLS in fractional order spaces. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire, 28(1):135–147, 2011

    2011

  8. [15]

    Local well-p osedness for the H 2-critical nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation

    Thierry Cazenave, Daoyuan Fang, and Zheng Han. Local well-p osedness for the H 2-critical nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 368(11):7911–7934, 2016

    2016

  9. [16]

    Local existence, global e xistence, and scattering for the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation.Commun

    Thierry Cazenave and Ivan Naumkin. Local existence, global e xistence, and scattering for the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation.Commun. Contemp. Math. , 19(2):1650038, 20, 2017

    2017

  10. [17]

    Spatial behavior for NLS a nd applications to scattering

    Thierry Cazenave and Ivan Naumkin. Spatial behavior for NLS a nd applications to scattering. In S´ eminaire Laurent Schwartz— ´Equations aux d´ eriv´ ees partielles et applications. Ann´ee 2017–2018 , pages Exp. No. I, 11. Ed. ´Ec. Polytech., Palaiseau, 2018

    2017

  11. [18]

    Local smooth solutions of the nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation

    Thierry Cazenave and Ivan Naumkin. Local smooth solutions of the nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S , 14(5):1649–1672, 2021

    2021

  12. [19]

    F. M. Christ and M. I. Weinstein. Dispersion of small amplitude solu tions of the generalized Korteweg-de Vries equation. J. Funct. Anal. , 100(1):87–109, 1991

    1991

  13. [20]

    Ill-posedne ss for nonlinear Schr¨ odinger and wave equations

    Michael Christ, James Colliander, and Terence Tao. Ill-posedne ss for nonlinear Schr¨ odinger and wave equations. arXiv preprint math/0311048 , 2003. THE OPTIMAL SOBOLEV THRESHOLD FOR EVOLUTION EQUATIONS WITH ROUGH NONLINEARITIES 65

    2003 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Polynomial upper bounds for the instability of the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation below the e nergy norm

    James Colliander, Markus Keel, Gigliola Staffilani, Hideo Takaoka, an d Terence Tao. Polynomial upper bounds for the instability of the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation below the e nergy norm. Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. , 2(1):33–50, 2003

    2003

  15. [22]

    Blow-up criteria for fractional nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations

    Van Duong Dinh. Blow-up criteria for fractional nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., 48:117–140, 2019

    2019

  16. [23]

    On the well-posedness for NLS in H s

    Daoyuan Fang and Zheng Han. On the well-posedness for NLS in H s. J. Funct. Anal. , 264(6):1438–1455, 2013

    2013

  17. [24]

    Well-posedness and dynamics of solutions to the generalized KdV with low power nonlinearity

    Isaac Friedman, Oscar Ria˜ no, Svetlana Roudenko, Diana Son, and Kai Yang. Well-posedness and dynamics of solutions to the generalized KdV with low power nonlinearity. Nonlinearity, 36(1):584–635, 2023

    2023

  18. [25]

    The Kato-Ponce inequality

    Loukas Grafakos and Seungly Oh. The Kato-Ponce inequality. Comm. Partial Differential Equations , 39(6):1128– 1157, 2014

    2014

  19. [26]

    Sharp w ell-posedness for the cubic NLS and mKdV in H s(R)

    Benjamin Harrop-Griffiths, Rowan Killip, and Monica Visan. Sharp w ell-posedness for the cubic NLS and mKdV in H s(R). Forum Math. Pi , 12:Paper No. e6, 86, 2024

    2024

  20. [27]

    On dispersive blow-ups for t he nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation.Differential Integral Equations, 29(9-10):875–888, 2016

    Younghun Hong and Maja Taskovic. On dispersive blow-ups for t he nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation.Differential Integral Equations, 29(9-10):875–888, 2016

    2016

  21. [28]

    Global solutions fo r cubic quasilinear ultrahyperbolic Schr¨ odinger flows

    Mihaela Ifrim, Ben Pineau, and Daniel Tataru. Global solutions fo r cubic quasilinear ultrahyperbolic Schr¨ odinger flows. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.06230 , 2025

    2025 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Local well-posedness for quas i-linear problems: a primer

    Mihaela Ifrim and Daniel Tataru. Local well-posedness for quas i-linear problems: a primer. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) , 60(2):167–194, 2023

    2023

  23. [30]

    Global solutions for cubic quasilin ear schroedinger flows in two and higher dimensions

    Mihaela Ifrim and Daniel Tataru. Global solutions for cubic quasilin ear schroedinger flows in two and higher dimensions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.09970 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  24. [31]

    On the boundedness of the mapping f ↦→ |f |µ , µ > 1 on Besov spaces

    Djalil Kateb. On the boundedness of the mapping f ↦→ |f |µ , µ > 1 on Besov spaces. Math. Nachr., 248/249:110– 128, 2003

    2003

  25. [32]

    On nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations

    Tosio Kato. On nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Phys. Th´ eor., 46(1):113–129, 1987

    1987

  26. [33]

    Nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations

    Tosio Kato. Nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations. InSchr¨ odinger operators (Sønderborg, 1988), volume 345 of Lecture Notes in Phys. , pages 218–263. Springer, Berlin, 1989

    1988

  27. [34]

    Kenig and Kenneth D

    Carlos E. Kenig and Kenneth D. Koenig. On the local well-posedne ss of the Benjamin-Ono and modified Benjamin-Ono equations. Math. Res. Lett. , 10(5-6):879–895, 2003

    2003

  28. [35]

    Kenig, Gustavo Ponce, and Luis Vega

    Carlos E. Kenig, Gustavo Ponce, and Luis Vega. Well-posedness and scattering results for the generalized Korteweg-de Vries equation via the contraction principle. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 46(4):527–620, 1993

    1993

  29. [36]

    Kenig and Hideo Takaoka

    Carlos E. Kenig and Hideo Takaoka. Global wellposedness of the m odified Benjamin-Ono equation with initial data in H 1/ 2. Int. Math. Res. Not. , pages Art. ID 95702, 44, 2006

    2006

  30. [37]

    KdV is well-posed in H − 1

    Rowan Killip and Monica Vi¸ san. KdV is well-posed in H − 1. Ann. of Math. (2) , 190(1):249–305, 2019

    2019

  31. [38]

    Energy-supercritical NLS: critical ˙H s-bounds imply scattering

    Rowan Killip and Monica Visan. Energy-supercritical NLS: critical ˙H s-bounds imply scattering. Comm. Partial Differential Equations , 35(6):945–987, 2010

    2010

  32. [39]

    The radial defocusing energy-supe rcritical nonlinear wave equation in all space dimensions

    Rowan Killip and Monica Visan. The radial defocusing energy-supe rcritical nonlinear wave equation in all space dimensions. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 139(5):1805–1817, 2011

    2011

  33. [40]

    Sharp Lr asymptotics of the small solutions to the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger eq uations

    Naoyasu Kita. Sharp Lr asymptotics of the small solutions to the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger eq uations. Nonlinear Anal., 52(4):1365–1377, 2003

    2003

  34. [41]

    Une extension du th´ eor` eme de Bourdaud-Kateb-Meyer

    Soulaymane Korry. Une extension du th´ eor` eme de Bourdaud-Kateb-Meyer. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S´ er. I Math., 331(3):197–200, 2000

    2000

  35. [42]

    Felipe Linares and Jo˜ ao P. G. Ramos. The Cauchy problem for th e L2-critical generalized Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation in dimension 3. Comm. Partial Differential Equations , 46(9):1601–1627, 2021. 66 BEN PINEAU AND MITCHELL A. TAYLOR

    2021

  36. [43]

    Interpolation theory , volume 16 of Appunti

    Alessandra Lunardi. Interpolation theory , volume 16 of Appunti. Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa (Nuova Serie). Edizioni della Normale, Pisa, 2018. Third edition

    2018

  37. [44]

    Marzuola, Jason Metcalfe, and Daniel Tataru

    Jeremy L. Marzuola, Jason Metcalfe, and Daniel Tataru. Quas ilinear Schr¨ odinger equations III: Large data and short time. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , 242(2):1119–1175, 2021

    2021

  38. [45]

    Edizioni della Normale, Pisa, 2008

    Guy M´ etivier.Para-differential calculus and applications to the Cauchy p roblem for nonlinear systems , volume 5 of Centro di Ricerca Matematica Ennio De Giorgi (CRM) Series . Edizioni della Normale, Pisa, 2008

    2008

  39. [46]

    On the regularity of the semilinear term on th e Cauchy problem for the Schr¨ odinger equa- tion

    Makoto Nakamura. On the regularity of the semilinear term on th e Cauchy problem for the Schr¨ odinger equa- tion. In Analysis, probability, applications, and computation , Trends Math. Res. Perspect., pages 369–377. Birkh¨ auser/Springer, Cham, 2019

    2019

  40. [47]

    Modified Strichartz estim ates with an application to the critical nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation.Nonlinear Anal., 130:138–156, 2016

    Makoto Nakamura and Takeshi Wada. Modified Strichartz estim ates with an application to the critical nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation.Nonlinear Anal., 130:138–156, 2016

    2016

  41. [48]

    Strichartz type estimat es in mixed Besov spaces with application to critical nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations.J

    Makoto Nakamura and Takeshi Wada. Strichartz type estimat es in mixed Besov spaces with application to critical nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations.J. Differential Equations , 267(5):3162–3180, 2019

    2019

  42. [50]

    Local solutions of semilinear wave equations in H s+1

    Hartmut Pecher. Local solutions of semilinear wave equations in H s+1. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. , 19(2):145–170, 1996

    1996

  43. [51]

    Solutions of semilinear Schr¨ odinger equation s in H s

    Hartmut Pecher. Solutions of semilinear Schr¨ odinger equation s in H s. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Phys. Th´ eor., 67(3):259–296, 1997

    1997

  44. [52]

    Ben Pineau and Mitchell A. Taylor. Low regularity solutions for th e general quasilinear ultrahyperbolic Schr¨ odinger equation.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , 248(6):Paper No. 122, 67, 2024

    2024

  45. [53]

    Ben Pineau and Mitchell A. Taylor. Global well-posedness for the generalized derivative nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation. Nonlinearity, 2025, to appear, DOI 10.1088/1361-6544/add076

    2025 doi

  46. [54]

    On Low Regularity Dynamics for Quasilinear Dispersive Equa tions and Free Boundary Problems

    Benjamin Royce Pineau. On Low Regularity Dynamics for Quasilinear Dispersive Equa tions and Free Boundary Problems. ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 2024. Thesis (Ph.D.)–University of California, Berkeley

    2024

  47. [55]

    Strichartz

    Robert S. Strichartz. Multipliers on fractional Sobolev spaces . J. Math. Mech. , 16:1031–1060, 1967

    1967

  48. [56]

    The nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation: self-focusing and wa ve collapse , volume 139

    Catherine Sulem and Pierre-Louis Sulem. The nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation: self-focusing and wa ve collapse , volume 139. Springer Science & Business Media, 2007

    2007

  49. [57]

    On local well-posedness for H s-critical nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations

    Kosuke Tabata and Takeshi Wada. On local well-posedness for H s-critical nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations. J. Evol. Equ. , 23(2):Paper No. 36, 24, 2023

    2023

  50. [58]

    Low regularity semi-linear wave equations

    Terence Tao. Low regularity semi-linear wave equations. Comm. Partial Differential Equations , 24(3-4):599–629, 1999

    1999

  51. [59]

    Global regularity of wave maps

    Terence Tao. Global regularity of wave maps. II. Small energy in two dimensions. Comm. Math. Phys. , 224(2):443–544, 2001

    2001

  52. [60]

    Global well-posedness and scattering for the hig her-dimensional energy-critical nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation for radial data

    Terence Tao. Global well-posedness and scattering for the hig her-dimensional energy-critical nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation for radial data. New York J. Math. , 11:57–80, 2005

    2005

  53. [61]

    Nonlinear dispersive equations: local and global analysis , volume 106 of CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics

    Terence Tao. Nonlinear dispersive equations: local and global analysis , volume 106 of CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2006

    2006

  54. [62]

    Mitchell A. Taylor. A Collection of Results on Nonlinear Dispersive Equations, Banach Lattices and Phase Retrieval. ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 2023. Thesis (Ph.D.)–University of California, Berkeley

    2023

  55. [63]

    Global strong solutions for nonlinear Schr¨ od inger equations

    Yoshio Tsutsumi. Global strong solutions for nonlinear Schr¨ od inger equations. Nonlinear Anal. , 11(10):1143– 1154, 1987. THE OPTIMAL SOBOLEV THRESHOLD FOR EVOLUTION EQUATIONS WITH ROUGH NONLINEARITIES 67

    1987

  56. [64]

    On well-posedness for n onlinear Schr¨ odinger equations with power non- linearity in fractional order Sobolev spaces

    Harunori Uchizono and Takeshi Wada. On well-posedness for n onlinear Schr¨ odinger equations with power non- linearity in fractional order Sobolev spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. , 395(1):56–62, 2012

    2012

  57. [65]

    The defocusing energy-critical nonlinear Schroedinger eq uation in dimensions five and higher

    Monica Visan. The defocusing energy-critical nonlinear Schroedinger eq uation in dimensions five and higher . ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 2006. Thesis (Ph.D.)–University of C alifornia, Los Angeles

    2006

  58. [66]

    The defocusing energy-critical nonlinear Schr¨ o dinger equation in higher dimensions

    Monica Visan. The defocusing energy-critical nonlinear Schr¨ o dinger equation in higher dimensions. Duke Math. J., 138(2):281–374, 2007

    2007

  59. [67]

    A remark on local well-posedness for nonlinear S chr¨ odinger equations with power nonlinearity— an alternative approach

    Takeshi Wada. A remark on local well-posedness for nonlinear S chr¨ odinger equations with power nonlinearity— an alternative approach. Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. , 18(3):1359–1374, 2019. Courant Institute for Mathematical Sciences, New York Univ ersity Email address : brp305@ny...

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.