Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Normalized solutions of nonlinear Dirac equations on noncompact metric graphs with localized nonlinearities

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper establishes the first existence theory of $L^2$-normalized solutions for nonlinear Dirac equations on noncompact metric graphs: unit-mass spinors for subcritical powers with small nonlinearity strength, for every $a>0$ under a…

desk verdict First normalized-solution results for nonlinear Dirac equations on metric graphs, but the general-c theorems rest on an unproved normalization and need a real scaling argument before they are usable as stated. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.15100 v1 pith:43STCU3O submitted 2025-05-21 math.AP

Zhentao He , Chao Ji This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35R0235Q4035A1534B45
keywords normalizedsolutionsnonlinearDiracequationsmetricgraphslocalizednonlinearitiesvariationalmethodsstronglyindefinitefunctionalperturbationargumentGagliardo-Nirenberginequality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether the nonlinear Dirac equation $Du-\omega u = a\chi_K |u|^{p-2}u$ on a noncompact metric graph, with the nonlinearity switched on only on the compact core $K$, admits solutions whose $L^2$ mass is fixed in advance (normalized solutions). It proves the first existence results of this kind: for subcritical powers $20$, a normalized solution exists on every such graph; for $p\ge 4$, normalized or sub-normalized solutions exist for large $a$; and under a tree-core topological assumption the normalized solution exists for every $a>0$. The proof is variational, combining a perturbation/reduction method for the strongly indefinite Dirac energy with a test-function construction that does not use the Fourier transform, which is unavailable on general graphs. If correct, the theorems open the study of mass-constrained relativistic solitons on networks, a setting previously treated only for nonlinear Schrödinger equations.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the strongly indefinite energy functional $I_\omega(u)=\tfrac12\|u^+\|^2-\tfrac12\|u^-\|^2-\tfrac{\omega}{2}\|u\|_2^2-\Psi(u)$ on the form domain $Y=Y^+\oplus Y^-$, where the splitting comes from the positive/negative spectral subspaces of $D$. Because $Y$ embeds compactly only into $L^p(K,\mathbb{C}^2)$, the nonlinearity is localized on $K$. The paper adapts the perturbation method of [19]: a penalization term $H_{r,\mu}(u)=f_r((T_\mu u,u)_2)$ with $T_\mu=I+\mu|D|$ replaces the hard constraint $\|u\|_2=1$, the reduced functional $J_{r,\mu}$ on $Y^+\cap U_\mu$ has mountain-pass geometry, and the minimax value $c_\infty=\sup_{r,\mu}c_{r,\mu}$ is shown to lie below $\tfrac{m}{2}$ by a new test function $\varphi_b=(\varphi_b^1,0)$ that is identically 1 on $K$ and decays linearly on the half-lines. The threshold $c_\infty<m/2$ is what forces the limiting solution to have unit mass. A Gagliardo-Nirenberg-Sobolev inequality on graphs (Lemma 2.1) converts energy bounds into mass bounds, and a graph-theoretic unique-continuation lemma (Lemma 5.2) excludes degenerate sub-normalized solutions on tree cores.

What would settle it

Repeat the estimate of Lemma 2.3 and of inequality (4.2) with the general operator $D=-ic\,\sigma_1\tfrac{d}{dx}+mc^2\sigma_3$. If the resulting threshold is not $a_0=m^{(4-p)/2}c^{(4-p)/2}/(2C_{p,K})$ — for instance if an extra power of $c$ appears from $\|u\|_2^2\le (mc^2)^{-1}\|u\|^2$ in the $L^p(K)$ estimates — then the theorems as stated hold only at $c=1$. A concrete check: take the half-line test function $\varphi_b$ of Lemma 2.3 for a single half-line with general $c$ and compute whether $c_\infty<\tfrac{mc^2}{2}$ still follows with the same choice $b\to0$; the calculation in (2.6) would acquire factors of $c$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the spectral-gap problem $Du-\omega u = a\chi_K|u|^{p-2}u$, $\int_G|u|^2=1$, with $D=-ic\,\sigma_1\tfrac{d}{dx}+mc^2\sigma_3$, has nontrivial solutions for suitable $\omega\in(-mc^2,mc^2)$. The main route is a dichotomy: for $2<p<4$, either a normalized solution exists, or a family of sub-normalized solutions (mass $<1$) exists at the bottom of the spectral gap; Theorem 1.3 rules out the second alternative when $a<a_0$, so a normalized solution exists. For $p\ge 4$ a similar dichotomy holds for large $a$ (Theorem 1.5), and for $4\le p<6$ the paper shows that lengthening a half-line (adding a vertex) forces the normalized alternative (Theorem 1.7 and Corollary 1.8). In the sign-flipped equation with $a<0$, all these results survive, and if $-mc^2$ is an eigenvalue of $D$, normalized solutions exist for every $p>2$ (Theorem 8.3). The paper also states that this is the first study of normalized solutions of nonlinear Dirac equations on metric graphs.

Load-bearing premise

The proof assumes the speed of light is 1 and claims that this does not affect the results, but gives no scaling that would restore a general speed of light; the theorems' stated dependence on mass and light speed therefore rests on an unproved normalization.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For $2<p<4$ and $0<a<a_0$, every noncompact metric graph with a non-empty compact core carries a normalized solution: $\|u\|_2=1$ and $Du-\omega u = a\chi_K|u|^{p-2}u$ for some $\omega\in(-mc^2,mc^2)$.
  • When the compact core is a tree with at most one leaf incident with no half-line, the normalized solution exists for every $a>0$, not just small $a$ (Theorem 1.4).
  • For $p\ge4$, if $a$ is large enough, either a normalized solution or a sub-normalized family exists; the sub-normalized alternative is excluded when the energy stays below $\tfrac{mc^2}{2}$ (Lemma 7.2), yielding genuine normalized solutions in the ranges covered by Theorems 1.5, 1.7, and Remark 1.6.
  • For $4\le p<6$, attaching a sufficiently long segment to a half-line produces a new metric graph on which a normalized solution exists, for any $a>0$ (Corollary 1.8).
  • For the sign-flipped equation with negative coefficient, the same existence theory holds; if $-mc^2\in\sigma_p(D)$ (e.g., the core contains a simple cycle), then for every $p>2$ either a normalized or sub-normalized solution exists, and for small $a$ a normalized one (Theorem 8.3).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The plateau-linear-decay test function suggests a general principle: on graphs, spectral-gap upper bounds for strongly indefinite problems can be obtained from functions that are constant on the compact core and decay linearly on half-lines, without Fourier analysis; this could transfer to Dirac operators with other vertex conditions or to fractional Dirac-type operators.
  • The dichotomy 'unit mass versus sub-normalized with $\omega$ at the edge of the gap' hints at a mass-threshold effect: the sub-normalized solutions might concentrate on $K$ as $a\to0$ or $\omega\to-mc^2$, producing spike profiles analogous to NLS ground states on graphs; this is not explored in the paper.
  • Because the proof is written at $c=1$, the stated dependence of thresholds on the speed of light ($a_0\sim m^{(4-p)/2}c^{(4-p)/2}$) is not actually established; a scaling analysis that tracks $\ell$, $a$, and the Gagliardo-Nirenberg constants would settle whether the nonrelativistic limit $c\to\infty$ is governed by these constants, connecting to the bound-state limit in [10].
  • The unique-continuation lemma restricts Theorem 1.4 to tree cores; if the 'at most one leaf' condition could be relaxed to graphs with cycles, Theorem 1.4 would extend to the graphs covered by Remark 8.4, where $-mc^2$ is an eigenvalue.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies normalized solutions (with L^2 mass equal to 1) of the nonlinear Dirac equation D u - ω u = a χ_K |u|^{p-2}u on noncompact metric graphs with nonempty compact core, where D is the Dirac operator with Kirchhoff-type vertex conditions. The authors adapt the reduction/perturbation method of Ding, Yu and Zhao [19] to the metric-graph setting, where the Fourier transform is not available. The main results are: for 2<p<4, a dichotomy theorem (Theorem 1.2) and existence of normalized solutions for 0<a<a_0 (Theorem 1.3); existence for all a>0 under a topological assumption on the compact core (Theorem 1.4); for p≥4, existence for a above a threshold (Theorem 1.5); the construction of graphs admitting normalized solutions for 4≤p<6 (Theorem 1.7 and Corollary 1.8); extensions to the negative-coefficient case and to the case where -mc^2 is an eigenvalue (Section 8); and an appendix on non-existence thresholds that depend on m and c.

Significance. If the results are valid, this is the first systematic treatment of normalized solutions of nonlinear Dirac equations on metric graphs, opening a genuinely new direction. The paper gives explicit thresholds, constructs test functions without Fourier transform, and covers several regimes (subcritical, critical/supercritical, negative coefficient, eigenvalue case). The proof is detailed in many places and the constants are explicit. However, the blanket normalization c=1 in Section 2.2, together with the importation of the reduction map from [19] without a proof, makes the general-c theorems not consequences of the written arguments.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.2] The statement 'For the remainder of the paper, we set c=1, as its value does not affect the results' is not justified. The theorem statements and the constants a_0 and a^{*,0} in (1.16) and (1.17) are given for general m,c>0, and Appendix A explicitly discusses the dependence of thresholds on c. The proof, however, uses the c=1 spectral inequality \|u\|^2 ≥ m\|u\|_2^2 in (4.1)-(4.2). Repeating the non-existence estimate without setting c=1 replaces m by mc^2 and changes the threshold by a power of c. The natural rescaling y=cx does not preserve the normalization ∫_G |u|^2 dx = 1 and also changes the coefficient a, so it is not a free normalization. The general-c theorems are therefore not consequences of the proofs as written; the authors should either carry c through the estimates or supply a correct scaling identity that restores the constants in (1.16)-(1.17).
  2. [Section 2.2, reduction map] The existence, regularity, and critical-point correspondence of the reduction maps h and h_{r,μ} are imported from [19] (and [15]) without proof. Those references concern the Euclidean setting R^N, whereas the present problem has metric-graph vertex conditions and no Fourier transform. Since Lemma 2.4 and Theorem 3.1 depend on h_{r,μ} being a C^1 map from Y^+ ∩ U_μ into Y with the stated one-to-one correspondence, the paper should either prove the reduction in this setting or state an abstract theorem and verify its hypotheses explicitly.
  3. [Theorem 3.1, Step 2] In the limit passage of Step 2, the proof asserts that 0 < c_{r_1,μ_1} ≤ (1/2)\|u_0^+\|^2 - (1/2)\|u_0^-\|^2 - Ψ(u_0) = c_∞. Weak lower semicontinuity gives at most an inequality in one direction; the equality with c_∞ is not established. The dichotomy (mass 1 or mass <1) may suffice for some existence conclusions, but the stated energy identity in Theorem 3.1 is not supported by the written argument. The authors should either justify the equality or remove it from the statement.
  4. [Proof of Theorem 1.4] The proof invokes 'similar to Lemma 6.1' to obtain c_{s,∞} < (m-s)/2 for all s∈(-m,m), but Lemma 6.1 is stated only for p≥4 and for a above a threshold. In the present setting 2<p<4 and a is arbitrary, so the needed bound is not proved. Since this bound is used to obtain the boundedness of {u_s} and the limiting solution u_{-m}, the missing argument should be supplied.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Statements and proofs of Theorem 1.2 and Theorem 1.4] Integrals over G are sometimes written as integrals over K, for example '∫_K |u_s|^2 dx = 1' in the proof of Theorem 1.2 and '∫_K |u_s|^2 dx < 1' in the proof of Theorem 1.4; these should be ∫_G to match the mass constraint.
  2. [Throughout] There are several typos: 'Thoerem' in the introduction, 'defiened' in Section 1, 'by by' in the definition of Sobolev spaces, and 'relying' in the introduction. Remark 5.3 states '±m are not the eigenvalue' and should read 'not eigenvalues'.
  3. [Section 8] Lemmas 8.5 and 8.6 again state 'we still set c=1 for simplicity', which repeats the normalization issue raised above; the c-dependent theorem statements in Section 8 require a consistent treatment of c.
  4. [Appendix A] Lemma A.2 refers to 'Lemma (A.1)' instead of Lemma A.1, and the notation \|u\|_{H^1} is used without redefinition in the appendix; a local definition would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the existence results reduce to independent Gagliardo-Nirenberg estimates and external variational tools, not to their own conclusions.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained with respect to the target theorems. The thresholds a0 and a*,0 in (1.16) and (1.17) are explicit expressions in the Gagliardo-Nirenberg-Sobolev constants C_{p,K} and C_{p,G} from Lemma 2.1; these constants are independent inputs and do not encode the existence of normalized solutions. The nonexistence arguments in Section 4 and Lemma 7.2 derive contradictions from the equation, the mass constraint, and the Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality, rather than assuming the desired conclusion. The variational reduction and perturbation functional follow the external works [10], [15], and [19], which are prior results by other authors used as tools, and the paper contains no author self-citations. The convention in Section 2.2 setting c=1 while theorems and the appendix retain m and c is a potential correctness gap in the stated generality, but it is a scaling/normalization issue, not circularity: no result is equivalent to its input by construction. The admitted open cases in Remark 8.4 are limitations, not circular steps. Hence no significant circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger contains no data-fitted parameters and no invented physical entities. The central results depend on functional-analytic infrastructure from [10] and [14], on the imported reduction framework from [19], on the unproved c=1 normalization, and, for the final theorem, on the explicit eigenvalue assumption (A). The thresholds a0 and a* are derived constants, not fitted values.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Dirac operator D with Kirchhoff-type vertex conditions is self-adjoint on L2(G,C2) and has spectrum (-∞,-mc^2] ∪ [mc^2,+∞).
    Invoked in Section 1, equation (1.13), to obtain the decomposition Y = Y- ⊕ Y+ and the norm bound ∥u∥ ≥ (mc^2)^{1/2}∥u∥_2. The paper cites [10] for this property.
  • standard math The Gagliardo-Nirenberg-Sobolev inequalities in Lemma 2.1 hold on metric graphs with constants C_{p,K} and C_{p,G}.
    Imported from [14, Theorem 1.1] and used throughout, for example in (2.6), (4.1), (7.2) and (7.4). These constants control the nonlinear terms and enter the thresholds a0 and a*.
  • domain assumption The variational reduction produces C1 maps h and h_{r,mu} with a one-to-one critical point correspondence between the strongly indefinite functional and the reduced functional.
    Stated in Section 2.2 as 'Following the arguments in [19, Section 2.3]'. This is load-bearing for Theorem 3.1 and the main existence theorems, but the proof is not reproduced in the paper.
  • ad hoc to paper Setting c=1 does not affect the results.
    Section 2.2 asserts this with no proof. All main estimates are written at c=1, while theorem statements and Appendix A keep m and c. A scaling argument would need to track a, the graph lengths, and the GNS constants, and is not supplied.
  • domain assumption For Theorem 8.3, lambda = -mc^2 is an eigenvalue of the operator D, assumption (A).
    Assumption (A) is used in Lemmas 8.5 and 8.6 to obtain phi in Y- with ∥phi∥^2 = m∥phi∥_2^2. Remark 8.4 gives a sufficient graph condition, namely K contains a simple cycle, but not a general characterization.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Normalized solutions of nonlinear Dirac equations on noncompact metric graphs with localized nonlinearities." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/43STCU3O

@misc{pith2026250515100,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Normalized solutions of nonlinear Dirac equations on noncompact metric graphs with localized nonlinearities},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/43STCU3O}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.15100}
}
abstract

In this paper, we study the following nonlinear Dirac equations (NLDE) on noncompact metric graph $\mathcal{G}$ with localized nonlinearities \begin{equation} \mathcal{D} u - \omega u= a\chi_{\mathcal{K}}|u|^{p-2}u, \end{equation} where $\mathcal{D}$ is the Dirac operator on $\mathcal{G}$, $u: \mathcal{G} \to \mathbb{C}^2$, $\omega\in \mathbb{R}$, $a > 0$, $\chi_{\mathcal{K}}$ is the characteristic function of the compact core $\mathcal{K}$, and $p>2$. First, for $2<p<4$, we prove the existence of normalized solutions to (NLDE) using a perturbation argument. Then, for $p \geq 4$, we establish the assumption under which normalized solutions to (NLDE) exist. Finally, we extend these results to the case $a<0$ and, for all $p>2$, prove the existence of normalized solutions to (NLDE) when $\lambda = -mc^2$ is an eigenvalue of the operator $\mathcal{D}$. In the Appendix, we study the influence of the parameters $m, c > 0$ on the existence of normalized solutions to (NLDE). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the normalized solutions to (NLDE) on metric graphs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.15100 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A noncompact graph G with finitely number of edges and a non-empty compact core. Date: September 16, 2025. Key words and phrases. Normalized solutions, Nonlinear Dirac equations, Metric graphs, Variational methods. 1 arXiv:2505.15100v1 [math.AP] 21 May 2025 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. K is a tree with at most one leaf incident with no half-line in G Lemma 5.2. Let p ≥ 2. Assume that u ∈ dom(D) such that Du − ωu = aχK|u| p−2u for some ω ∈ R. Then (i) for any vertex v ∈ V and edge e ≻ v, if uf ≡ 0 for all f ≻ v and f ̸= e, then ue ≡ 0. (ii) if K is a tree with at most one leaf incident with no half-line in G and uH ≡ 0 on every half-line H ∈ E, then u ≡ 0. Proof. (i) By [13, Remark 6 in Chapter 8],… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Local well-posedness for nonlinear Dirac equation on $N$-star metric graphs

    math.AP 2026-07 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    Local well-posedness holds for the Kerr nonlinear Dirac equation on N-star graphs for data in H_D^s ∩ L^∞ with 0 ≤ s < 1/2, with L² conservation and a blow-up alternative.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [19]

    Y. Ding, Y. Yu, F. Zhao,L 2-Normalized Solitary Wave Solutions of a Nonlinear Dirac Equation, J. Geom. Anal. 33(2023), Paper No. 69, 25 pp. 3, 9, 10

    work page 2023

  2. [15]

    Buffoni, M

    B. Buffoni, M. Esteban, E. S´ er´ e, Normalized solutions to strongly indefinite semilinear equations, Adv. Nonlinear Stud. 6(2006), 323-347. 3, 4, 16

    work page 2006

  3. [1]

    Ackermann, A nonlinear superposition principle and multibump solutions of periodic Schr¨ odinger equations, J

    N. Ackermann, A nonlinear superposition principle and multibump solutions of periodic Schr¨ odinger equations, J. Funct. Anal. 234(2006), 277-320. 9

    work page 2006

  4. [2]

    Adami, C

    R. Adami, C. Cacciapuoti, D. Finco, D. Noja, Fast solitons on star graphs, Rev. Math. Phys. 23(2011), 409-451. 2

    work page 2011

  5. [3]

    Adami, C

    R. Adami, C. Cacciapuoti, D. Finco, D. Noja, Constrained energy minimization and orbital stability for the NLS equation on a star graph, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire 31(2014), 1289-1310. 2

    work page 2014

  6. [4]

    Adami, E

    R. Adami, E. Serra, P. Tilli, NLS ground states on graphs, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 54(2015), 743-761. 2

    work page 2015

  7. [5]

    Adami, E

    R. Adami, E. Serra, P. Tilli, Threshold phenomena and existence results for NLS ground states on metric graphs, J. Funct. Anal. 271(2016), 201-223. 2

    work page 2016

  8. [6]

    Adami, E

    R. Adami, E. Serra, P. Tilli, Negative energy ground states for theL 2-critical NLSE on metric graphs, Comm. Math. Phys. 352(2017), 387-406. 2

    work page 2017

Show all 35 references
  1. [7]

    Adami, E

    R. Adami, E. Serra, P. Tilli, Multiple positive bound states for the subcritical NLS equation on metric graphs, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 58(2019), Paper No. 5, 16 pp. 2

    2019

  2. [8]

    Berkolaiko, P

    G. Berkolaiko, P. Kuchment, Introduction to quantum graphs, Math. Surveys Monogr., 186, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2013. xiv+270 pp, ISBN:978-0-8218-9211-4. 1, 16 30 Z. HE AND C. JI

    2013

  3. [9]

    Bondy, U.S.R

    J.A. Bondy, U.S.R. Murty, Graph theory, Grad. Texts in Math., 244, Springer, New York, 2008. xii+651 pp, ISBN:978- 1-84628-969-9. 16, 17

    2008

  4. [10]

    Borrelli, R

    W. Borrelli, R. Carlone, L. Tentarelli, Nonlinear Dirac equation on graphs with localized nonlinearities: bound states and nonrelativistic limit, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 51(2019), 1046-1081. 3, 4, 5, 9, 15, 18, 29

    2019

  5. [11]

    Borrelli, R

    W. Borrelli, R. Carlone, L. Tentarelli, On the nonlinear Dirac equation on noncompact metric graphs, J. Differential Equations 278(2021), 326-357. 3, 4

    2021

  6. [12]

    Borthwick, X

    J. Borthwick, X. Chang, L. Jeanjean, N. Soave, Normalized solutions ofL 2-supercritical NLS equations on noncompact metric graphs with localized nonlinearities, Nonlinearity 36(2023), 3776-3795. 2

    2023

  7. [13]

    Brezis, Functional analysis, Sobolev spaces and partial differential equations, Universitext, pp

    H. Brezis, Functional analysis, Sobolev spaces and partial differential equations, Universitext, pp. xiv+599, Springer, New York, 2011, ISBN:978-0-387-70913-0. 8, 9, 17, 18, 26, 28

    2011

  8. [14]

    Brezis, P

    H. Brezis, P. Mironescu, Where Sobolev interacts with Gagliardo-Nirenberg, J. Funct. Anal. 277(2019), 2839-2864. 9, 27

    2019

  9. [16]

    Carrillo, D

    P. Carrillo, D. Galant, L. Jeanjean, C. Troestler, Infinitely many normalized solutions ofL2-supercritical NLS equations on noncompact metric graphs with localized nonlinearities, arxiv No.2403.10959, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Chang, L

    X. Chang, L. Jeanjean, N. Soave, Normalized solutions ofL 2-supercritical NLS equations on compact metric graphs, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire 41(2024), 933-959. 2

    2024

  11. [18]

    Y. Ding, T. Xu, Localized concentration of semi-classical states for nonlinear Dirac equations, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 216(2015), 415-447. 9

    2015

  12. [20]

    Dovetta, Existence of infinitely many stationary solutions of theL 2-subcritical and critical NLSE on compact metric graphs, J

    S. Dovetta, Existence of infinitely many stationary solutions of theL 2-subcritical and critical NLSE on compact metric graphs, J. Differential Equations 264(2018), 4806-4821. 2

    2018

  13. [21]

    Dovetta, L

    S. Dovetta, L. Jeanjean, E. Serra, Normalized solutions ofL 2-supercritical NLS equations on noncompact metric graphs, arxiv No.2404.15841, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Dovetta, E

    S. Dovetta, E. Serra, P. Tilli, Uniqueness and non-uniqueness of prescribed mass NLS ground states on metric graphs, Adv. Math. 374(2020), 107352, 41 pp. 2

    2020

  15. [23]

    Dovetta, L

    S. Dovetta, L. Tentarelli,L 2-critical NLS on noncompact metric graphs with localized nonlinearity: topological and metric features, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 58(2019), Paper No. 108, 26 pp. 2

    2019

  16. [24]

    Gnutzmann, U

    S. Gnutzmann, U. Smilansky, S. Derevyanko, Stationary scattering from a nonlinear network, Phys. Rev. A 2011, 83, 033831. 2

    2011

  17. [25]

    Grigor’yan, Introduction to analysis on graphs, University Lecture Series, 71

    A. Grigor’yan, Introduction to analysis on graphs, University Lecture Series, 71. vol. 8, pp. viii+150, American Math- ematical Society, Providence, RI (2018), ISBN: 978-1-4704-4397-9. 16

    2018

  18. [26]

    Haddad, L.D

    L.H. Haddad, L.D. Carr, The nonlinear Dirac equation in Bose-Einstein condensates: Foundation and symmetries, Physical D 238(2009), 1413-1421. 3

    2009

  19. [27]

    Jeanjean, L

    L. Jeanjean, L. Song, Sign-changing prescribed mass solutions forL 2-supercritical NLS on compact metric graphs, arxiv No. 2501.14642, 2025. 2

    2025

  20. [28]

    Noja, Nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation on graphs: Recent results and open problems, Philos

    D. Noja, Nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation on graphs: Recent results and open problems, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 372(2014), 20130002, 20 pp. 2

    2014

  21. [29]

    Perko, Differential equations and dynamical systems, Third edition, Texts Appl

    L. Perko, Differential equations and dynamical systems, Third edition, Texts Appl. Math., 7, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2001. xiv+553 pp, ISBN:0-387-95116-4. 17

    2001

  22. [30]

    Pierotti, N

    D. Pierotti, N. Soave, G. Verzini, Local minimizers in absence of ground states for the critical NLS energy on metric graphs, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 151(2021), 705-733. 2

    2021

  23. [31]

    Sabirov, D.B

    K.K. Sabirov, D.B. Babajanov, D.U. Matrasulov, P.G. Kevrekidis, Dynamics of Dirac solitons in networks, J. Phys. A 51(2018), 435203, 13 pp. 3

    2018

  24. [32]

    Serra, L

    E. Serra, L. Tentarelli, Bound states of the NLS equation on metric graphs with localized nonlinearities, J. Differential Equations 260(2016), 5627-5644. 2

    2016

  25. [33]

    Serra, L

    E. Serra, L. Tentarelli, On the lack of bound states for certain NLS equations on metric graphs, Nonlinear Anal. 145(2016), 68-82. 2

    2016

  26. [34]

    Tentarelli, NLS ground states on metric graphs with localized nonlinearities, J

    L. Tentarelli, NLS ground states on metric graphs with localized nonlinearities, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 433(2016), 291-304. 2

    2016

  27. [35]

    T.X. Tran, S. Longhi, F. Biancalana, Optical analogue of relativistic Dirac solitons in binary waveguide arrays, Ann. Phys. 340(2014), 179-187. 3 NONLINEAR DIRAC EQUATIONS 31 (Z. He) School of Mathematics East China University of Science and Technology Shanghai 200237, PR Chin...

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.