Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Pointwise convergence of polynomial multiple ergodic averages along the primes

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves pointwise almost-everywhere convergence for von Mangoldt-weighted polynomial multiple ergodic averages of any order k, for polynomials of distinct integer degrees, with r-variational estimates for every r>2.

desk verdict First pointwise a.e. theorem for prime-weighted polynomial multiple ergodic averages with k>=3; proof likely correct, but the C0=100 uniformity assertion needs to be written out. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.15549 v2 pith:MRFCXZ4A submitted 2025-05-21 math.DS math.CAmath.NT

Mariusz Mirek , Renhui Wan , James Wright This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DSmath.CAmath.NT MSC 37A3037A4642A4542A8543A2511B30
keywords polynomialmultipleergodicaveragespointwiseconvergencevonMangoldtweightprimesvariationalestimatesmultilinearcirclemethodinversetheoremlittleGowersnorms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes pointwise almost-everywhere convergence for averages of the form $$\frac{1}{N}\sum_{n=1}^{N}\La(n) f_1($T^{{P_1(n)}}$x)\cdots f_k($T^{{P_k(n)}}$x),$$ where $\La$ is the von Mangoldt function, equal to $\log p$ on prime powers and zero otherwise, $T$ is an invertible measure-preserving transformation of a probability space, and $P_1,\ldots,P_k$ are integer polynomials of distinct degrees. This settles the prime-weighted analogue of a long-standing multiple-recurrence question for any number $k$ of polynomial iterates, and it does so quantitatively: the averages satisfy $r$-variational bounds for every $r>2$, not merely convergence. The result refines the earlier norm-convergence theorem for these averages to pointwise convergence and removes the restrictions of the previously known bilinear case, at the price of requiring the functions to lie in $L^\infty(X)$. The paper's contribution is a multilinear circle method adapted to prime weights, whose distinguishing feature is that it works with inverse theorems that supply only subpolynomial bounds.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Cramér approximant $\La_N(n)$, a weighted indicator of integers coprime to the product of all primes up to $\exp(\mathrm{Log}^{1/100}N)$, which stands in for the von Mangoldt function inside the averages. The argument is carried by four components: (i) a weighted multilinear inverse theorem and a multilinear Weyl inequality for Cramér-weighted averages, giving minor-arcs decay $2^{-cl}+\exp(-c\mathrm{Log}^{1/C_0}N)$ that is subpolynomial rather than polynomial; (ii) the multiplier theorem for canonical fractions, which compares discrete and continuous Fourier multipliers; (iii) a multilinear Rademacher–Menshov inequality, derived inductively from the bilinear case, used for the small-scale low-frequency case; and (iv) an arithmetic multilinear estimate on the adelic integers together with $p$-adic $L^2\to L^{2s}$ improving estimates, used for the large-scale low-frequency case. The subpolynomial decay makes the earlier metric-entropy arguments inapplicable, and the new low-frequency estimates replace them.

What would settle it

Run the correlation computation behind estimate (4.10) with the parameter $C_0=100$: compute the little Gowers norm $\|\La-\La_N\|_{u_{d+1}[N]}$, a measure of correlation with polynomial phases, for a fixed degree $d$, at scales $N=10^m$ up to $10^{12}$, with $\La_N$ the Cramér approximant at $\exp(\log^{1/100}N)$. The claim requires this to decay faster than any power of $\log N$; any scale at which the decay is merely polynomial, or absent, would falsify the estimate on which the reduction from von Mangoldt to Cramér averages rests.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim, Theorem 1.1, is that for every $k\ge 1$, every invertible measure-preserving transformation $T$ of a probability space $(X,\nu)$, every family of integer-coefficient polynomials $P_1,\ldots,P_k$ of distinct degrees, and every $f_1,\ldots,f_k\in L^\infty(X)$, the weighted multiple ergodic averages $A^P_{N,\La;X}(f_1,\ldots,f_k)$ converge pointwise $\nu$-almost everywhere as $N\to\infty$, and satisfy the $r$-variational estimate (1.5) for every $r>2$ and $0<q<\infty$, with constants depending only on the polynomials, the lacunarity parameter, $r$, $q$, and $k$. Because the von Mangoldt function is supported on prime powers, this is equivalent to almost-everywhere convergence of the prime-weighted averages taken over primes $p\le N$. The proof transfers the problem to the integer shift system and develops a multilinear circle method: a minor-arcs estimate for Cramér-weighted averages, a major-arcs estimate split into high-frequency, small-scale low-frequency, and large-scale low-frequency cases, and supporting harmonic-analysis and arithmetic estimates on the adelic integers.

Load-bearing premise

The theorem stands on the assumption that the Cramér approximant, a simple weight built from the small primes, can be substituted for the von Mangoldt function at the very slow scale $\exp((\log N)^{1/100})$ with an error that decays faster than every power of $\log N$ in the little Gowers norm, which measures correlation with polynomial phases; the paper takes the needed uniformity with $C_0=100$ from a cited result, asserting in a footnote that the methods extend, without giving the derivation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The prime-weighted averages (1.4) converge pointwise almost everywhere for any number $k$ of polynomial iterates with distinct integer degrees, removing the bilinear restriction of the earlier pointwise result.
  • The $r$-variational estimates for every $r>2$ provide quantitative control over the oscillations of the averages along lacunary sequences, not just eventual convergence.
  • Since pointwise convergence on a probability space implies norm convergence by dominated convergence, the earlier norm-convergence theorem for these averages is recovered as a corollary.
  • With the necessary adjustments, the same method also gives pointwise almost-everywhere convergence of the unweighted distinct-degree polynomial multiple ergodic averages.
  • The fact that the circle method can be run with inverse theorems that supply only subpolynomial bounds is a structural gain: it suggests that other multilinear problems without polynomial-bounded inverse theorems are now approachable.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Estimate (4.10), the reduction from the von Mangoldt weight to the Cramér approximant, is imported from the cited higher-uniformity work with $C_0=100$ by a footnote that asserts an extension beyond the stated $C_0=10$; no derivation of that extension appears here, so the full theorem as stated depends on an unverified uniformity claim.
  • The subpolynomial decay of the minor-arcs estimate explains the paper's restriction to a single transformation: the polynomial-decay arguments that handle commuting transformations in the unweighted setting do not survive once the prime weight is present, so an extension to commuting transformations would require a genuinely new low-frequency argument.
  • The requirement $f_1,\ldots,f_k\in L^\infty$ enters through the norm-interchanging trick and the $p$-adic estimates in the large-scale low-frequency case; extending the theorem to $L^p$ inputs would require a different treatment of that case.
  • The arithmetic multilinear estimate on the adelic integers is a general statement about polynomial configurations on profinite groups with one function missing low frequencies, so it may be reusable for other prime-weighted or multiplicative-weight problems in ergodic theory and additive combinatorics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proves a pointwise almost everywhere convergence theorem for von Mangoldt-weighted polynomial multiple ergodic averages along the primes. For any k≥1, any invertible measure-preserving transformation, any integer-coefficient polynomials of distinct degrees, and any bounded functions, the averages converge pointwise a.e.; moreover, a sharp r-variational estimate with r>2 is established. The proof builds a multilinear circle method: it reduces the von Mangoldt weight to a Cramér approximant via a little Gowers uniformity estimate, proves a Cramér-weighted inverse theorem and Weyl-type minor-arc inequality, and then splits the major-arc analysis into high-frequency, low-frequency small-scale, and low-frequency large-scale cases. The latter two cases are handled through a new multilinear Rademacher-Menshov inequality and an arithmetic multilinear estimate on the adelic integers. The paper also states auxiliary theorems for σ-finite systems and gives a reduction to the integer shift system via Calderón transference.

Significance. If the proof is correct, the result is a substantial advance: it settles the prime-weighted analogue of Bergelson's question for polynomials of distinct degrees in the single-transformation case, refines the norm-convergence theorem of Wooley–Ziegler, and extends the bilinear prime-weighted pointwise result of Krause–Mousavi–Tao–Teräväinen to arbitrary k with L∞ inputs. The paper introduces a multilinear circle method for von Mangoldt weights, including a Cramér-weighted inverse theorem, a multilinear Rademacher-Menshov inequality, and arithmetic multilinear estimates, and it is notable for working with inverse theorems having subpolynomial bounds. The proof structure is coherent, and the author is transparent about the main external inputs, which include the Ionescu–Wainger theorem [30], Teräväinen's generalized von Neumann theorem [53], and the uniformity estimate [35]. The reliance on recent preprints is a real caveat, but those results are used as tools rather than as hidden assumptions of the conclusion.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.1, Eq. (4.10), footnote 7] The reduction from the von Mangoldt function Λ to the Cramér approximant Λ_N is the hinge of the proof, and the required uniformity estimate (4.10) is imported from [35] with the parameter C0=100, although [35, Theorem 1.1] is stated for C0=10. Footnote 7 asserts that the methods of [35] extend to arbitrarily large C0, but no derivation is supplied in the manuscript. Since (4.11) and the rest of Section 4.1 depend on (4.10) with this specific choice, the paper should either prove (4.10) for general C0 or state it as a lemma with a proof. This is not a cosmetic omission: without the C0=100 uniformity, the replacement of Λ by Λ_N fails and the minor/major arc reduction is not justified.
  2. [§4.1, Eq. (4.11) and Lemma 2.3] In proving (4.11), Lemma 2.3 is applied to the weight θ = Λ − Λ_N, but Lemma 2.3 requires |θ| ≤ 1, whereas (2.18) only gives |Λ − Λ_N| ≲ ⟨Log N⟩. One can normalize by ⟨Log N⟩ and then absorb the affine factor by choosing M sufficiently large, but this step is not written out. As the text stands, the displayed bound does not follow directly from the cited lemma. Please add the normalization argument and make explicit how the parameter M is used after the normalization.
  3. [§3.1.1, proof of Theorem 3.2 for j≥3] The proof of Theorem 3.2 is carried out in detail for j=1 and j=2, but the cases j=3,…,k are dispatched with the sentence "Similarly, repeating the above process." Since Theorem 3.2 feeds directly into the weighted inverse theorem, the dual-function structure, and ultimately the minor-arcs estimate (3.4), the induction over j should be stated more precisely, in particular how the distinct-degree condition is used at each step and how the polynomial-coefficient bounds are preserved under the congruence-based factorization. This is currently a gap in exposition, though it appears repairable.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3, proof of Proposition 3.4] The word "yeilds" should be "yields" in the final sentence of the proof.
  2. [§6.3, proof of (6.18)] The word "non-nagetive" should be "nonnegative" near the definition of the function φ.
  3. [§4.1, notation] The symbol C0 is used both for the fixed exponent in the Cramér approximant (3.3) and for the sufficiently large threshold in (4.5); these two uses should be distinguished to avoid confusion.
  4. [Theorem 4.1 and its proof] The notation switches between ℓ^q(Z) and L^q(Z) in the same statements, particularly in (4.2) and the surrounding text; the counting-measure convention should be stated explicitly and used consistently.
  5. [§1.4 and §4.1, derivations] The deduction of Theorem 1.2 from Theorem 1.3 is delegated to [31, Proposition 3.2] and [29, Theorem 1.6]; a brief sentence explaining the required modifications for the Λ_N weight would improve self-containedness, since the weighted averages are not literally operators treated in those references.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circularity: the prime-weight result is reduced to external uniformity estimates and independent prior tools; the C0=100 gap in (4.10) is an omitted proof, not a circular step.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain replaces the von Mangoldt weight Λ with the Cramér approximant Λ_N using (4.6)-(4.11), with the key estimate (4.10) quoted from [35, Theorem 1.1]. This is an external theorem (Matomäki–Shao–Tao–Teräväinen), not the present authors' own result, and it does not contain the target pointwise-convergence statement. Footnote 7's assertion that the C0=10 argument extends to C0=100 is an omitted derivation, but it is a correctness risk rather than circularity: the estimate is neither defined in terms of the conclusion nor fitted to it. The paper's self-citations to [30] and [31] are used as independent tools (Ionescu–Wainger multiplier theorem, unweighted inverse theorems, continuous Weyl inequality, Rademacher–Menshov inequality); these results do not assume or assert the prime-weighted convergence being proved, and the weighted inverse theorem and minor/major-arc estimates are proved from them rather than identified with them. There is no fitted parameter called a prediction and no renaming of a known result. A short checkable gap exists around (4.10) and around normalizing the non-1-bounded weight in (4.11), but neither makes the argument circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The proof introduces no invented entities and fits no data. It uses several arbitrary constants (C0, c, c_prime, l(N)) chosen for convenience; these do not affect the truth of the final theorem. The result rests on a set of deep external theorems (Ionescu-Wainger, generalized von Neumann, Peluse inverse theorem, Matomäki-Shao-Tao-Teräväinen uniformity) that are cited and used as black boxes.

free parameters (2)
  • C0 (large constant) = 100 (chosen by hand, Section 3)
    Sets the scale of the Cramér approximant Lambda_N = Lambda_{Cramér, exp(Log^{1/C0} N)} and the decay exponent. Any sufficiently large value works; it does not change the statement of Theorem 1.1.
  • l(N) frequency scale = floor(tilde_c Log^{1/C0} N) with sufficiently small tilde_c > 0 (4.3)
    Balances the minor arcs decay (Theorem 3.1) against the metric entropy and arithmetic estimates in the major arcs. Chosen by hand; not a data fit.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Matomäki-Shao-Tao-Teräväinen uniformity estimate (4.10): ||Lambda - Lambda_N||_{u_{dk+1}[N]} <<_{M,C0} <Log N>^{-M} for every M >= 1.
    Invoked in Section 4 to estimate the error between the von Mangoldt function and the Cramér approximant. This is an external deep result from [35], not proved in the paper.
  • domain assumption Teräväinen's generalized von Neumann theorem (Lemma 2.3).
    Reduces correlations with von Mangoldt-weighted averages to averages weighted by the Cramér or Heath-Brown approximant. External result from [53].
  • domain assumption Ionescu-Wainger multiplier theorem for canonical fractions (Theorem 2.1).
    Used throughout to transfer Fourier multiplier bounds from R to Z. Proven in [30]; not re-proved here.
  • domain assumption Peluse's inverse theorem [47, Theorem 3.3].
    Used in the proof of the unweighted inverse theorem (Theorem 3.2) and therefore in the weighted inverse theorem (Theorem 3.3).
  • domain assumption Counting bound for polynomial equations over Z/p^j Z ([31, Corollary C.2]).
    Used in the proof of the p-adic estimates (6.26)-(6.27) for the averaging operators on Z_p^×.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Pointwise convergence of polynomial multiple ergodic averages along the primes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MRFCXZ4A

@misc{pith2026250515549,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Pointwise convergence of polynomial multiple ergodic averages along the primes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MRFCXZ4A}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.15549}
}
abstract

We establish pointwise almost everywhere convergence for the polynomial multilinear ergodic averages $$\frac{1}{N} \sum_{n=1}^N \La(n) f_1(T^{P_1(n)} x)\cdots f_k(T^{P_k(n)} x)$$ as $N\to \infty$, where $\La$ is the von Mangoldt function, $T \colon X \to X$ is an invertible measure-preserving transformation of a probability space $(X,\nu)$, $P_1,\ldots, P_k$ are polynomials with integer coefficients and distinct degrees, and $f_1,\ldots,f_k\in L^\infty(X)$. This pointwise almost everywhere convergence result can be seen as a refinement of the norm convergence result obtained in Wooley--Ziegler (Amer. J. Math, 2012) in the case of polynomials with distinct degrees. We develop a multilinear circle method for von Mangoldt-weighted (equivalently, prime-weighted) averages in the general $k$-linear setting. The advantage of our method, besides establishing Weyl-type inequalities for multilinear Cram{\'e}r-weighted averages and sharp $p$-adic $L^q$-improving multilinear estimates among other tools, is that for the first time it allows us to work with inverse theorems having subpolynomial bounds in the general multilinear setting. This, in turn, yields sharp $r$-variational estimates $r > 2$ for our weighted polynomial multilinear ergodic average and, more importantly, offers prospects for addressing other multilinear problems involving inverse theorems lacking polynomial bounds.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Structure of 2-step nilpotent ergodic averages for distinct-degree polynomials

    math.DS 2026-07 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    For 2-step nilpotent actions, polynomial averages with distinct-degree iterates converge to the product of the integrals, and the joint ergodicity conjecture for Z^D polynomial actions is fully resolved.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [53]

    Ter¨ av¨ ainen, Pointwise convergence of ergodic averages with M¨ obius weight, arXiv:2401.03174v2

    J. Ter¨ av¨ ainen, Pointwise convergence of ergodic averages with M¨ obius weight, arXiv:2401.03174v2

    arXiv

  2. [30]

    D. Kosz, M. Mirek, S. Peluse, J. Wright, The multilinear circle method and a question of Bergelson, arXiv:2411.09478v2. 44 POINTWISE CONVERGENCE

    arXiv

  3. [35]

    Matom¨ aki, X

    K. Matom¨ aki, X. Shao, T. Tao, J. Ter¨ av¨ ainen, Higher uniformity of arithmetic functions in short intervals I. All intervals, Forum Math. Pi 11 (2023), Paper No. e29, 97 pp

    work page 2023

  4. [31]

    Krause, M

    B. Krause, M. Mirek, T. Tao, Pointwise ergodic theorems for non-conventional bilinear polynomial averages, Ann. of Math. (2) 195 (2022), 997-1109

    work page 2022

  5. [1]

    Austin, On the norm convergence of non-conventional ergodic averages, Ergodic Theory Dynam

    T. Austin, On the norm convergence of non-conventional ergodic averages, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 30 (2010), pp. 321–338

    work page 2010

  6. [2]

    Bergelson, Ergodic Ramsey Theory – an update, Ergodic Theory of Zd-actions (edited by M

    V. Bergelson, Ergodic Ramsey Theory – an update, Ergodic Theory of Zd-actions (edited by M. Pollicott and K. Schmidt), London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Series 228 (1996), pp. 1–61

    work page 1996

  7. [3]

    Bergelson, A

    V. Bergelson, A. Leibman, A nilpotent Roth theorem, Invent. Math. 147 (2002), pp. 429–470

    work page 2002

  8. [4]

    Bergelson, Combinatorial and Diophantine Applications of Ergodic Theory (with appendices by A

    V. Bergelson, Combinatorial and Diophantine Applications of Ergodic Theory (with appendices by A. Leib- man and by A. Quas and M. Wierdl), Handbook of Dynamical Systems, Vol. 1B, B. Hasselblatt and A. Katok, eds., Elsevier (2006), pp. 745–841

    work page 2006

Show all 58 references
  1. [5]

    Birkhoff, Proof of the ergodic theorem, Proc

    G. Birkhoff, Proof of the ergodic theorem, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 17 (1931), no. 12, pp. 656–660

    1931

  2. [6]

    Bourgain, Double recurrence and almost sure convergence, J

    J. Bourgain, Double recurrence and almost sure convergence, J. Reine Angew. Math. 404 (1990), pp. 140–161

    1990

  3. [7]

    Bourgain, Pointwise ergodic theorems for arithmetic sets, Inst

    J. Bourgain, Pointwise ergodic theorems for arithmetic sets, Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci. Publ. Math. 69 (1989), 5-45

    1989

  4. [8]

    Bourgain, An approach to pointwise ergodic theorems, Geometric aspects of functional analysis (1986/87), Lecture Notes in Math., 317, 204–223

    J. Bourgain, An approach to pointwise ergodic theorems, Geometric aspects of functional analysis (1986/87), Lecture Notes in Math., 317, 204–223. Springer, Berlin, 1988

    1986

  5. [9]

    Bourgain, M

    J. Bourgain, M. Mirek, E.M. Stein, B. Wr´ obel, Dimension-free estimates for discrete Hardy-Littlewood averaging operators over the cubes in Zd, Amer. J. Math. 141 (2019), 857-905

    2019

  6. [10]

    Bruhat, Distributions sur un groupe localement compact et applications ` a l’´ etude des repr´ esentations des groupes ℘-adiques, Bull

    F. Bruhat, Distributions sur un groupe localement compact et applications ` a l’´ etude des repr´ esentations des groupes ℘-adiques, Bull. Soc. Math. France 89 (1961), pp. 43-75

    1961

  7. [11]

    Calder´ on, Ergodic theory and translation invariant operators, Proc

    A. Calder´ on, Ergodic theory and translation invariant operators, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 59 (1968), pp. 349–353

    1968

  8. [12]

    Q. Chu, N. Frantzikinakis, B. Host, Ergodic averages of commuting transformations with distinct degree polynomial iterates, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 102 (2011), no. 5, pp. 801–842

    2011

  9. [13]

    Y. Do, C. Muscalu, C. Thiele, Variational estimates for paraproducts, Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 28 (2012), no. 3, pp. 857–878

    2012

  10. [14]

    Duoandikoetxea, J.L

    J. Duoandikoetxea, J.L. Rubio de Francia, Maximal and singular integral operators via Fourier transform estiamtes, Invent. Math. 84 (1986), no. 3, pp. 541–561

    1986

  11. [15]

    G. B. Folland, A course in abstract harmonic analysis, 2nd ed., Textbooks in Mathematics, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2016

    2016

  12. [16]

    Frantzikinakis, Some open problems on multiple ergodic averages, Bull

    N. Frantzikinakis, Some open problems on multiple ergodic averages, Bull. Hellenic Math. Soc. 60 (2016), pp. 41–90

    2016

  13. [17]

    Frantzikinakis, B

    N. Frantzikinakis, B. Host, B. Kra, Multiple recurrence and convergence for sequences related to the prime numbers, J. Reine Angew. Math., 611 (2007), 131–144

    2007

  14. [18]

    Frantzikinakis, B

    N. Frantzikinakis, B. Kuca, Joint ergodicity for commuting transformations and applications to polynomial sequences, Invent. Math. 239 (2025), 621-706

    2025

  15. [19]

    Frantzikinakis, B

    N. Frantzikinakis, B. Kra, Polynomial averages converge to the product of integrals, Israel J. Math. 148 (2005), pp. 267–276

    2005

  16. [20]

    Furstenberg

    H. Furstenberg. Ergodic behavior of diagonal measures and a theorem of Szemer´ edi on arithmetic progres- sions, J. Anal. Math. 31 (1977), pp. 204–256

    1977

  17. [21]

    Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, third edition, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol

    L. Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, third edition, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 249, Springer, New York, 2014

    2014

  18. [22]

    W. T. Gowers, A new proof of Szemer´ edi’s theorem, Geom. Funct. Anal., 11 (2001), 465-588

    2001

  19. [23]

    Green, T

    B. Green, T. Tao, T. Ziegler, An inverse theorem for the Gowers U s+1[N ]-norm, Ann. of Math. (2), 176(2) (2012), 1231-1372

    2012

  20. [24]

    Host, Ergodic seminorms for commuting transformations and applications, Studia Math

    B. Host, Ergodic seminorms for commuting transformations and applications, Studia Math. 195 (2009), pp. 31–49

    2009

  21. [25]

    B. Host, B. Kra, Non-conventional ergodic averages and nilmanifolds, Ann. of Math. 161 (2005), pp. 397– 488

    2005

  22. [26]

    B. Host, B. Kra, Convergence of polynomial ergodic averages, Israel J. Math. 149 (2005), pp. 1–19

    2005

  23. [27]

    Ionescu, S

    A. Ionescu, S. Wainger, Lp boundedness of discrete singular Radon transforms, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 19 (2005), 357-383

    2005

  24. [28]

    Iwaniec, E

    H. Iwaniec, E. Kowalski. Analytic number theory , Amer. Math. Soc. Colloq. Publ., 53 American Mathe- matical Society, Providence, RI, 2004

    2004

  25. [29]

    Kosz, Sharp constants in inequalities admitting the Calder´ on transference principle, Ergodic Theory Dynam

    D. Kosz, Sharp constants in inequalities admitting the Calder´ on transference principle, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 44 (2024), pp. 1597–1608

    2024

  26. [32]

    Krause, H

    B. Krause, H. Mousavi, T. Tao, J. Ter¨ av¨ ainen, Pointwise convergence of bilinear polynomial averages over the primes, arXiv:2409.10510

  27. [33]

    Leibman, Convergence of multiple ergodic averages along polynomials of several variables, Israel J

    A. Leibman, Convergence of multiple ergodic averages along polynomials of several variables, Israel J. Math. 146 (2005), pp. 303–315

    2005

  28. [34]

    L´ epingle, La variation d’ordre p des semi-martingales, Z

    D. L´ epingle, La variation d’ordre p des semi-martingales, Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verw. Gebi- ete. 36 (1976), no. 4, pp. 295–316

    1976

  29. [36]

    Matom¨ aki, X

    K. Matom¨ aki, X. Shao,Discorrelation between primes in short intervals and polynomial phases , Int. Math. Res. Not., 2021 (2021), 12330–12355

    2021

  30. [37]

    Mehlhop, W

    N. Mehlhop, W. S lomian, Oscillation and jump inequalities for the polynomial ergodic averages along multi-dimensional subsets of primes, Math. Ann. 388 (2024), no. 3, 2807-2842

    2024

  31. [38]

    Mirek, Square function estimates for discrete Radon transforms, Anal

    M. Mirek, Square function estimates for discrete Radon transforms, Anal. PDE 11 (2018), 583-608

    2018

  32. [39]

    Mirek, E.M

    M. Mirek, E.M. Stein, P. Zorin-Kranich. Jump inequalities via real interpolation, Math. Ann. 376 (2020), no. 1–2, pp. 797–819

    2020

  33. [40]

    Mirek, E.M

    M. Mirek, E.M. Stein, B. Trojan, ℓp-estimates for discrete operators of Radon type: variational estimates, Invent. Math. 209 (2017), 665-748

    2017

  34. [41]

    Mirek, B

    M. Mirek, B. Trojan, P. Zorin-Kranich, Variational estimates for averages and truncated singular integrals along the prime numbers, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 369 (2017), 5403-5423

    2017

  35. [42]

    Mirek, E.M

    M. Mirek, E.M. Stein, P. Zorin-Kranich, A bootstrapping approach to jump inequalities and their applica- tions, Anal. PDE 13 (2020), no. 2, pp. 527–558

    2020

  36. [43]

    Nair, On polynomials in primes and J

    R. Nair, On polynomials in primes and J. Bourgain ’s circle method approach to ergodic theorems , Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 11 (1991), no. 3, 485–499

    1991

  37. [44]

    Nair, On polynomials in primes and J

    R. Nair, On polynomials in primes and J. Bourgain ’s circle method approach to ergodic theorems. II., Studia Math., 105 (1993), no. 3, 207–233

    1993

  38. [45]

    von Neumann, Proof of the quasi-ergodic hypothesis, Proc

    J. von Neumann, Proof of the quasi-ergodic hypothesis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 18 (1932), pp. 70–82

    1932

  39. [46]

    M. S. Osborne, On the Schwartz–Bruhat space and the Paley–Wiener theorem for locally compact abelian groups, J. Functional Analysis 19 (1975), pp. 40–49

    1975

  40. [47]

    Peluse, Bounds for sets with no polynomial progressions, Forum Math

    S. Peluse, Bounds for sets with no polynomial progressions, Forum Math. Pi 8 (2020), e16, 55 pp

    2020

  41. [48]

    Rudin, Fourier analysis on groups, Interscience Tracts in Pure and Applied Mathematics, No

    W. Rudin, Fourier analysis on groups, Interscience Tracts in Pure and Applied Mathematics, No. 12 Interscience Publishers, New York–London 1962

    1962

  42. [49]

    Szemer´ edi

    E. Szemer´ edi. On sets of integers containing nok elements in arithmetic progression, Acta Arith. 27 (1975), pp. 199–245

    1975

  43. [50]

    Tao, Norm convergence of multiple ergodic averages for commuting transformations, Ergodic Theory Dynam

    T. Tao, Norm convergence of multiple ergodic averages for commuting transformations, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 28 (2008), pp. 657–688

    2008

  44. [51]

    Tao, The Ionescu-Wainger multiplier theorem and the adeles, Mathematika 67 (2021), 647-677

    T. Tao, The Ionescu-Wainger multiplier theorem and the adeles, Mathematika 67 (2021), 647-677

    2021

  45. [52]

    T. Tao, J. Ter¨ av¨ ainen, Quantitative bounds for Gowers uniformity of the M¨ obius and von Mangoldt func- tions, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 27 (2025), no. 4, 1321-1384

    2025

  46. [54]

    Trojan, Variational estimates for discrete operators modeled on multi-dimensional polynomial subsets of primes, Math

    B. Trojan, Variational estimates for discrete operators modeled on multi-dimensional polynomial subsets of primes, Math. Ann. 374 (2019), 1597-1656

    2019

  47. [55]

    Walsh, Norm convergence of nilpotent ergodic averages, Ann

    M. Walsh, Norm convergence of nilpotent ergodic averages, Ann. of Math. 175 (2012), no. 3, pp. 1667–1688

    2012

  48. [56]

    Wierdl, Pointwise ergodic theorem along the prime numbers , Israel J

    M. Wierdl, Pointwise ergodic theorem along the prime numbers , Israel J. Math., 64 (1988), no. 3, 315–336

    1988

  49. [57]

    Wooley, T

    T. Wooley, T. Ziegler, Multiple recurrence and convergence along the primes , Amer. J. Math, 134 (2012), 1705–1732

    2012

  50. [58]

    Ziegler, Universal characteristic factors and Furstenberg averages, J

    T. Ziegler, Universal characteristic factors and Furstenberg averages, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 20 (2007), pp. 53–97. Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of NSLSCS, School of Mathematical Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, People’s Republic of China Email address...

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.